Professional Documents
Culture Documents
DOI 10.1007/s00330-013-3026-4
PEDIATRIC
Received: 21 June 2013 / Revised: 13 August 2013 / Accepted: 6 September 2013 / Published online: 25 September 2013
# European Society of Radiology 2013
Abstract
Objective To compare the image quality of contrast-enhanced
abdominopelvic 3D fat-suppressed T1-weighted gradientecho imaging with radial and conventional Cartesian k-space
acquisition schemes in paediatric patients.
Methods Seventy-three consecutive paediatric patients were
imaged at 1.5 T with sequential contrast-enhanced T1weighted Cartesian (VIBE) and radial gradient echo (GRE)
acquisition schemes with matching parameters when possible.
Cartesian VIBE was acquired as a breath-hold or as free breathing in patients who could not suspend respiration, followed by
free-breathing radial GRE in all patients. Two paediatric radiologists blinded to the acquisition schemes evaluated multiple
parameters of image quality on a five-point scale, with higher
score indicating a more optimal examination. Lesion presence
or absence, conspicuity and edge sharpness were also evaluated. Mixed-model analysis of variance was performed to compare radial GRE and Cartesian VIBE.
Results Radial GRE had significantly (all P <0.001) higher
scores for overall image quality, hepatic edge sharpness, hepatic
vessel clarity and respiratory motion robustness than Cartesian
VIBE. More lesions were detected on radial GRE by both readers
than on Cartesian VIBE, with significantly higher scores for
lesion conspicuity and edge sharpness (all P <0.001).
Conclusion Radial GRE has better image quality and lesion
conspicuity than conventional Cartesian VIBE in paediatric
patients undergoing contrast-enhanced abdominopelvic MRI.
Key Points
Numerous techniques are required to provide optimal MR
images in paediatric patients.
Radial free-breathing contrast-enhanced acquisition demonstrated excellent image quality.
Image quality and lesion conspicuity were better with radial
than Cartesian acquisition.
More lesions were detected on contrast-enhanced radial
than on Cartesian acquisition.
Radial GRE can be used for performing abdominopelvic
MRI in paediatric patients.
Keywords Radial k-space sampling . Radial VIBE .
Paediatric abdominopelvic MRI . Contrast-enhanced
T1-weighted gradient-echo imaging . Free-breathing
abdominal MRI
Introduction
Magnetic resonance imaging is increasingly utilised in the
evaluation of abdominopelvic problems in paediatric patients
because it lacks ionising radiation and provides superior soft
tissue contrast [13]. Nevertheless, there are various challenges
to the widespread acceptance of paediatric MRI in clinical
practice, including long examination times and motion-related
artefacts [4]. Physiological and bulk motion, including respiratory motion, cardiac pulsation and bowel peristalsis, can degrade the image quality of an abdominopelvic MR examination
and can render images non-diagnostic [58].
The three-dimensional T1-weighted gradient echo sequence
with Cartesian k-space sampling (Volume Interpolated Breathhold Examination, or VIBE) performed before and after intravenous injection of gadolinium contrast agent is an important
321
Score
Scoring system
15
15
15
15
15
15
322
Table 2 Image quality scores for
radial GRE and conventional
Cartesian VIBE stratified by
reader
Parameter
Reader 1
Cartesian
Mean SD
Radial
Mean SD
Cartesian
Mean SD
Radial
Mean SD
2.90.8
3.00.8
2.790.8
3.61.0
4.20.7
4.30.6
4.10.8
5.00.2
<0.001
<0.001
<0.001
<0.001
3.00.9
3.11.0
3.10.9
3.51.0
4.50.6
4.60.6
4.30.7
5.00.0
<0.001
<0.001
<0.001
<0.001
Reader 2
323
Fig. 2 A 6-month-old patient with suspected vasculitis underwent postcontrast abdominopelvic MRI with sequential (A) conventional Cartesian
volume interpolated breath-hold examination (VIBE) and (B) radial
GRE. Radial GRE received higher scores for all parameters of image
quality from both readers than conventional Cartesian VIBE
reference standard for lesion presence or absence. This radiologist was blinded to the evaluation performed by the two
readers who assessed lesion presence or absence and lesion
image quality.
In total, 31 patients with 31 lesions greater than 0.5 cm
were identified on the reference standard: 10 renal lesions, 6
hepatic lesions, 4 patients with Crohns disease and/or complications of Crohns disease, 3 patients with retroperitoneal
mass/lymphadenopathy, 2 adrenal masses, 2 patients with
peritoneal metastatic lesions, 1 spinal mass, 1 patient with
neurofibroma, 1 patient with pericoeliac soft tissue due to
vasculitis and 1 splenic mass. Reader 1 (with 6 years MRI
experience) identified all of the 31 lesions with radial GRE
(100 % sensitivity) and 28 lesions with Cartesian VIBE
(90.3 % sensitivity). Hence, three lesions were only identified
with radial GRE but had been missed on Cartesian VIBE
(Fig. 3). Reader 2 (with 3 years MRI experience) identified
29 lesions with radial GRE (93.5 % sensitivity) and 23 lesions
with Cartesian VIBE (74.2 % sensitivity). Hence, six lesions
were diagnosed only with radial GRE but had been missed on
the conventional Cartesian VIBE by reader 2. This increased
sensitivity for lesion detection on radial GRE by reader 2 was
statistically significant (P =0.03). There was greater lesion
conspicuity (4.70.6 vs. 3.70.9; P <0.001) and lesion edge
sharpness (4.40.7 vs. 3.30.7; P <0.001) with radial GRE
Results
All 73 patients underwent radial GRE and conventional Cartesian VIBE acquisitions. Thus, a total of 146 data sets were
evaluated by each reader independently.
Image qualitative evaluation
With data provided by the two readers, scores for overall image
quality (4.30.6 vs. 3.00.8), hepatic edge sharpness (4.40.6
vs. 3.00.9), hepatic vessel clarity (4.20.8 vs. 2.90.9) and
respiratory motion robustness (5.00.2 vs. 3.51.0) were significantly higher (all P <0.001) for radial GRE than for conventional Cartesian VIBE. Image quality scores for radial GRE
were significantly higher than for Cartesian VIBE irrespective
of the reader providing the data (Table 2, Figs. 1 and 2).
Lesion evaluation
Review of the entire data set (all sequences) by a third radiologist with 6 years abdominal MRI experience served as a
conventional VIBE but was detected with radial GRE by both readers
(arrow). On review of the entire data set, this lesion was suspected to be
an atypical focal nodular hyperplasia (FNH)
324
Discussion
Our results show that paediatric abdominopelvic T1-weighted
3D examination is feasible with radial k-space sampling during free breathing, with overall image quality that is significantly better than that of the conventional Cartesian acquisition. All parameters of image quality, including hepatic vessel
clarity and hepatic edge sharpness, were scored higher by both
readers for the radial acquisition scheme than for the conventional Cartesian acquisition. Furthermore, spatial resolution
was greater with the radial acquisition scheme than with
Cartesian acquisition owing to the need to acquire Cartesian
data within a breath-hold. Lesion conspicuity and lesion edge
sharpness were rated higher with the radial sampling scheme
than with the Cartesian VIBE. Reader 1 and reader 2 missed
three and six lesions respectively on conventional VIBE that
were identified on the radial GRE.
Degradation of image quality by patient motion is an
important reason for the under-utilisation of paediatric
abdominopelvic MRI in clinical practice, despite its excellent
contrast resolution and lack of ionising radiation. In young
children, breath-holding may be impractical or impossible.
Moreover, while deep sedation or general anaesthesia can help
Fig. 5 A 2-year-old patient with
hepatoblastoma underwent postcontrast abdominopelvic MRI
with sequential (A) conventional
Cartesian VIBE and (B) radial
GRE. A left hepatic lobe
hepatoblastoma lesion had higher
conspicuity and edge sharpness
with radial GRE than Cartesian
VIBE
to control gross body motion artefacts, it cannot control respiratory motion artefacts. To decrease motion-related artefacts,
techniques such as the PROPELLER method, which acquires
k-space data in blades using a radial-type readout scheme,
have been proposed. These PROPELLER techniques have
demonstrated substantial reduction in respiratory motionrelated artefacts and improved image quality for twodimensional (2D) T2-weighted turbo-spin-echo (TSE) as well
as diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) of the liver [1821]. A
radial acquisition scheme has recently been employed for
performing free-breathing T1-weighted imaging in the abdomen [17, 22]. A recent study by Azevedo et al. suggested that
although free-breathing radial VIBE had lower image quality
scores than conventional VIBE in adults who could breathhold, the technique may be helpful in uncooperative patients
like children who cannot adequately suspend respiration on
command [16].
Decreased sensitivity to motion is the clear advantage of
radial k-space sampling. With conventional Cartesian k-space
sampling, object motion translates into dominant motion artefacts (ghosting) along the phase-encoding direction as well as
overall image blurring. Such a vulnerable phase-encoding axis
does not exist in the radial geometry, and motion artefacts
present as streaks with the stack-of-stars scheme where radial
sampling is performed in plane. Structures that experience
motion can also appear slightly blurry with the radial acquisition scheme. These streak artefacts are easy to identify because
325
References
1. Darge K, Anupindi SA, Jaramillo D (2011) MR imaging of the
abdomen and pelvis in infants, children, and adolescents.
Radiology 261:1229
2. MacKenzie JD, Vasanawala SS (2010) State-of-the-art in pediatric
body and musculoskeletal magnetic resonance imaging. Semin
Ultrasound CT MR 31:8699
3. Michael R (2008) Potential of MR-imaging in the paediatric abdomen. Eur J Radiol 68:235244
4. Olsen OE (2008) Imaging of abdominal tumours: CT or MRI?
Pediatr Radiol 38:S452S458
5. Axel L, Summers RM, Kressel HY, Charles C (1986) Respiratory
effects in two-dimensional Fourier transform MR imaging.
Radiology 160:795801
6. Ehman RL, McNamara MT, Brasch RC, Felmlee JP, Gray JE,
Higgins CB (1986) Influence of physiologic motion on the appearance of tissue in MR images. Radiology 159:777782
7. Maki JH, Chenevert TL, Prince MR (1997) The effects of incomplete
breath-holding on 3D MR image quality. J Magn Reson Imaging 7:
11321139
8. Schultz CL, Alfidi RJ, Nelson AD, Kopiwoda SY, Clampitt ME
(1984) The effect of motion on two-dimensional Fourier transformation magnetic resonance images. Radiology 152:117121
9. Dearlove O, Corcoran JP (2007) Sedation of children undergoing
magnetic resonance imaging. Br J Anaesth 98:548549
10. Lawson GR (2000) Controversy: sedation of children for magnetic
resonance imaging. Arch Dis Child 82:150153
11. Nagle SK, Busse RF, Brau AC et al (2012) High resolution navigated
three-dimensional T(1)-weighted hepatobiliary MRI using gadoxetic
acid optimized for 1.5 Tesla. J Magn Reson Imaging 36:890899
12. Vasanawala SS, Iwadate Y, Church DG, Herfkens RJ, Brau AC
(2010) Navigated abdominal T1-W MRI permits free-breathing image acquisition with less motion artifact. Pediatr Radiol 40:340344
13. Young PM, Brau AC, Iwadate Y et al (2010) Respiratory navigated
free breathing 3D spoiled gradient-recalled echo sequence for
contrast-enhanced examination of the liver: diagnostic utility and
comparison with free breathing and breath-hold conventional examinations. AJR Am J Roentgenol 195:687691
14. Lin W, Guo J, Rosen MA, Song HK (2008) Respiratory motioncompensated radial dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE)-MRI of chest
and abdominal lesions. Magn Reson Med 60:11351146
326
15. Song HK, Dougherty L (2004) Dynamic MRI with projection reconstruction and KWIC processing for simultaneous high spatial and
temporal resolution. Magn Reson Med 52:815824
16. Azevedo RM, de Campos RO, Ramalho M, Heredia V, Dale BM,
Semelka RC (2011) Free-breathing 3D T1-weighted gradient-echo
sequence with radial data sampling in abdominal MRI: preliminary
observations. AJR Am J Roentgenol 197:650657
17. Chandarana H, Block TK, Rosenkrantz AB et al (2011) Freebreathing radial 3D fat-suppressed T1-weighted gradient echo sequence: a viable alternative for contrast-enhanced liver imaging in
patients unable to suspend respiration. Invest Radiol 46:648653
18. Deng J, Miller FH, Salem R, Omary RA, Larson AC (2006)
Multishot diffusion-weighted PROPELLER magnetic resonance imaging of the abdomen. Invest Radiol 41:769775
19. Deng J, Omary RA, Larson AC (2008) Multishot diffusion-weighted
SPLICE PROPELLER MRI of the abdomen. Magn Reson Med 59:
947953
20. Hirokawa Y, Isoda H, Maetani YS, Arizono S, Shimada K, Togashi K
(2008) Evaluation of motion correction effect and image quality with
the periodically rotated overlapping parallel lines with enhanced
reconstruction (PROPELLER) (BLADE) and parallel imaging
21.
22.
23.
24.
25.