Professional Documents
Culture Documents
A.
Zeno, the Stoic introduced the word, Logic. The word came from the Greek word logike which means a
treatise on matters pertaining to thought. Logike is closely related to another Greek word, logos which
means thought, reason or word.
Aristotle (384-322 B.C.) who started the study of logic, believed that it is the organon or instrument for
discovering and presenting truths. It is the instrument of all scientific investigations. It is through logical
methods that the sciences discover the truths peculiar to their subject matter. It is also through logical
demonstrations or argument that they prove their findings to be true and, therefore, acceptable. Logic
then is a prerequisite of all sciences.
B.
The Supreme Creator has seen it fit to endow each creature with talent or power commensurate to its
nature. The wonders of His gifts may be glimpsed in the fierceness of the lion, in the speed of the horse, in
the strength of the elephant, in the flight of the sparrow, and the like. But the rarest of these gifts belongs
to man. This is the ability to reason.
The ability to reason correctly is innate to man.
Aquinas defined as the habit of the first principles. This is natural logic. Hence, we say, that as rational
beings, we are logicians by nature.
It was natural logic which guided man to the invention of the fire and of the wheel. These discoveries, long
before man ever thought of building a schoolhouse, laid the cornerstone of progress and civilization. And
yet, common sense needs to be trained and sharpened to bring out the fullness of its
potentials.
Without, proper instruction, common sense is prone to mistakes, leaving the process of
reasoning to trial-and-error.
The singer, the dancer, the athlete, the painter, and the speaker all need systematized instruction on
how to develop their natural talents and how to use them effectively. In the same manner, each person
needs the science and art of logic to develop the habit of confident and valid reasoning.
Logic does not do away with common sense. Logic presupposes it and codifies its laws, shaping it into a
reliable instrument for the acquisition of knowledge.
C.
Definition of Logic
Logic is defined as the science and art of correct thinking. Just as chemistry investigates the laws
governing the composition, relationships, and affinities of matter, and just as physics studies the laws of
matter as endowed with motion and energy, so logic investigates, discovers, and applies the laws which
we must follow in order to think expeditiously and correctly.
o
Thinking. Thinking, in ordinary speech refers to any or to all movements of the mind, such
as imagining, recalling, memorizing, comprehension, analyzing, or , even daydreaming. However, in
the definition of logic as the science and art of correct thinking, the word thinking does not include
absolutely all mental operations but only those mental operations (1) that are directed toward the
attainment of truth and (2) by which we elaborate upon knowledge previously possessed.
Thinking then includes analysis, comparison, classification, definition, logical division and so on, and
especially the various kinds of inference.
Art. Art gives facility, in reasoning and judging correctly about things to be made such as
statues, paintings, chairs, and syllogisms and secondly, in making them in accordance with the
demands of reason. Logic is an art because it guides mans reason so he can proceed with
order and ease and without error in the constructive activity of making definitions,
propositions, syllogisms, and so on. Indeed, logic is the Art of Arts (Ars Artium), or a sort of a
super-art, for it directs reason itself, which is the director of the other arts. Yet, it is an art only in a
secondary sense of the word, for its products (unlike those of sculpture, painting, building, and so on)
are purely mental and imperceptible to the senses.
D.
Logic does not give us knowledge of the real world, at least, not directly, but only of certain aspects of our
thought. It does not consider real things but certain aspects of our knowledge of real things. Hence, (1)
logic inasmuch as it is a mere tool of reason, makes no direct contribution to the content of our
thought and (2) it presupposes means of attaining truth over which it has no control.
o
Indeed, reliance on
authority is often the only possible way of getting information about things that we
have not witnessed ourselves. It is also the reason why we accept many of the conclusions
of science: no one not even a great scientist can examine all the data of science and test the
validity of all its conclusions for himself. Reliance on authority is also the reason for accepting
the dogmas of revealed religion.
Now, logic has no direct bearing on the acceptance of statements on authority. It can, however,
have an indirect bearing. First, it can sometimes help us make a critical examination of
the reasons for accepting an authority as worthy of credence. For instance, logic can
help us discover inconsistencies of thought; and we will rightly be suspicious of the reliability of
an authority (a newspaper columnist, editorialist, historian, and so on) if he makes statements
that we find to be either self-contradictory or inconsistent with what we already know to be true.
Secondly, logic can guide us when we elaborate on what an authority proposed to us
as true.
Thus, authority, just as experience and insight into principles can supply us with
things to think about that is, with matter that we can subject to logical analysis and use as the
starting point of inference.
E.
The study of logic is divided into: material logic and formal logic.
Material logic teaches us how truths are arrived at with certitude. It provides the principles by which we
may acquire true and certain knowledge. On the other hand, formal logic teaches us how we may be
correct in the presentation of an argument. It gives us the principles of rules of logical thinking.
Every argument has matter and form.
Matter belongs to the jurisdiction of material logic, which guides us in making the matter or thoughtcontent of an argument true.
The form refers to the structure of the argument. It is the function of formal logic to determine whether
the pattern or structure is correct or not.
A valid, that is, acceptable argument is one which is true in its matter and correct in its form.
Examples:
1. Every rose is a flower; therefore, some flowers are roses.
(Valid in both matter and form)
2. Every triangle is a plane figure bounded by three straight lines; therefore, every plane figure
bounded by three straight lines is a triangle.
F.
Posterior Analytics of Aristotles logical works, expanded with a longer treatise on the hypothetical
syllogism, and with a treatise on the criterion of truth.
Chrysippus, a Greek philosopher, developed a logic in which the fundamental
elements were whole propositions. To him, every proposition is either true or false. He developed
rules of which the truth or falsity of the proposition is determined.
Poryphyrius, a Neo-Platonist, wrote a small introduction to the Categories of
o
Organon.
o
Peter Abelard reconstructed and refined the logic of Aristotle and Chrysippus.
of Aristotle. He introduced the theory of Induction, which John Stuart Mill developed into a general
theory for scientific investigation.
Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz attempted to develop a symbolic language or calculus
Whitehead and Bertrand Russell were the chief exponents of symbolic logic. Today, symbolic
logic lost much of its earlier popularity and interest primarily because of its limited scope of
application.
G.
The Importance of Logic
Logic is a subject, which provides the learner with theoretical and practical value. The study of logic is
intellectually rewarding for it provides knowledge for its own sake. This is because many of its principles
are clear and systematic and are useful in the understanding of the philosophical and non-philosophical
issues.
The study of logic has practical uses. Some of which are enumerated below.
1.
With the understanding of the principles and methods of logical inference, a person can
reason out clearly.
2.
3.
Knowledge of logic will help a person to evaluate persuasions, which use mere
propaganda or psychological means such as emotion and majority pressure, rather than supporting
evidences or reason.
4.
Logic will provide a person a good grasp of logical terminologies useful in understanding
works or writings in philosophy, in physical and in other sciences.
5.
Logic will provide a person to develop a critical attitude toward his and others
assumptions and presuppositions that serves as bases of ones arguments.
6.
Logic will make a person aware of ambiguity of words and of various functions of
language, and will encourage him to be more exact and hence, more effective in the use of
language.
7.
Logic will motivate a person to value the systematic and objective approach in analyzing
issues and in doing things.
Simple Apprehension
Simple apprehension refers to the act of the mind as it apprehends or grasps a particular entity or
reality. This enables the mind to know the essence (or which makes a thing a thing) as such thing,
entity, or reality. As the mind apprehends, grasps, or knows the thing, it produces an idea constituting
the essence of the thing (because the idea of the thing represents the thing as a thing).
2.
Judgment
Judgment is understood as an act of the mind through which the mind compares two ideas specifically
in terms of their relation, agreement or disagreement. This mental operation is expressed in what
logicians call proposition.
3.
Reasoning
Reasoning is an act of the mind through which the mind abstracts (from the Latin word abstrare
meaning to draw) or infers a specific judgment which is tacitly contained in other judgments. This
mental operation is expressed in what logicians call inference or argument.
Mental Operations
Simple Apprehension
Judgment
Reasoning
The Term
External Expression
Idea /Term
Proposition
Inference/Argument
The term is the basic component of a proposition. In this case, a term is a word or group of words that can
serve as the subject or predicate of a proposition. According to Bachhuber, the term is also the sensible
conventional sign of a concept. Written language, for him, directly signifies oral language and this, in turn,
signifies thought. In this study, we take the term to mean both the oral and the written word.
1.
A term is sensible, because, being material, it is perceptible to the senses, such as our
sense of hearing or sight.
A term is conventional because it is a sort of name or label coined by men and its usage
depends upon convention or tradition. For this reason, terms are not constant or unchanging
like the concept they represent. Some terms are rendered obsolete and are dropped as they are no
longer fashionable.
3.
A term is a sign because it represents a concept and through the concept, it represents reality.
What constitutes a term as such is its meaning. The meaning of a given term is the concept which it
represents. A term without a concept to back it up is literally meaningless. But such terms have a
function is a language and is not entirely useless.
A.
b.
c.
2.
B.
a.
b.
c.
Quiddity is derived from the Latin word, quid which means what?; hence, it means whatness. In
this context, essence and nature are nearly synonymous with quiddity.
1.
Significant terms are terms that signify the quiddity or whatness, essence or
nature of the thing or things they stand for.
Examples: man, school, dog
2.
Non-Significant terms merely point out things without signifying their quiddities,
essences or natures.
Examples:
a.
b.
c.
C.
2.
Collective Terms signify the quiddities of a group of individuals but not of those
individuals taken singly.
Examples: army, team, flock, pack
D.
The Comprehension of a term is the sum total of the intelligible elements (notes) of the
quiddity signified by the term. Notes refer to those essential attributes which constitute the nature
of a thing.
The nature of physical things is often complex. It cannot be expressed mentally by a single note.
The nature of man, for instance, is expressed by several conceptual notes, namely,
substance,
corporeal, vegetative, sentient, and rational. The concept man is a rational animal
since
2.
The Extension of a term includes the subjects signified by the term. The subjects, falling
within the comprehension of a concept, are said to be the inferiors of that concept, which in turn,
it called the superior concept.
Dwayne, Kobe, Tracy, Tim and Aleth, or taken collectively as Filipino, Chinese, Japanese, Indonesian,
American, etc.
The inferiors of mother would include my mother, his mother, their mother, or, Aling
Marsha, Aling
Absolute Extension is the sum total of the subjects- of the actual subjects as
well as the possible subjects- whose quiddity is signified by the term.
b.
1)
2)
the mind when they are used in discourse. The extension of a term may be said to be universal,
particular or singular.
EXTENSION
Spirits, minerals, plants, beasts, men
Minerals, plants, beasts, men
Plants, beasts, men
Beasts, men
Men
If asked which of two terms has the greater comprehension, you must ask yourself two questions:
First, you must ask yourself whether the terms are related as a superior and an inferior term. For instance,
of the two terms iron and silver, you cannot say that either of them has greater comprehension than
the other, because they are related as coordinate species rather than as superior and inferior terms that
is, you cannot say Iron is silver. or Silver is iron. However, metal and iron are related as superior
and inferior term because Iron is metal.
Secondly, you must ask yourself which of the two terms gives more information about the subject of which
it is predicated which term gives all the information that the other gives and something else besides. For
instance, iron has greater comprehension than metal because the proposition This is iron. tells me all
that the proposition This is metal. tells me and something else besides.
Classification of Terms according to their Comprehension
1.
Univocal Terms signify exactly the same concept, in at least two occurrences of the
term. The same term and exactly the same meaning.
Examples:
a.
b.
c.
2.
Equivocal Terms stand for different concepts in each of at least two occurrences of the
term. The same term but completely different meaning. Terms are sometimes equivocal in
pronunciation only; sometimes in writing only or both.
Examples:
a.
b.
c.
d.
3.
Analogous Terms applied to their inferiors in a sense that is partly the same and partly
different. The same term but partly the same and partly different meaning.
Examples:
a.
b.
c.
E.
b.
c.
2.
3.
b.
Given the mind has an image of a tree, which it picked up from the imagination, memory supplies the mind
with an image say, an acacia tree. The mind now compares the two images and notices certain similarity
between them. So the mind asserts: there is an acacia. This assertion in the mind is called judgment,
the thought-content of the second operation of the mind, the act of affirming or denying.
Suppose that the tree in reality (i.e. not the tree in the mind, but the tree in the outside world) is, in fact,
an acacia tree.
Such
judgment then is knowledge; that is, he knows that the tree in reality is an acacia tree.
Judgment then may be equated to, or may be considered knowledge only when the judgment is true.
Assuming that the judgment conforms to reality, therefore is true, then the person has knowledge; the
person knows. He would like to express and share his knowledge with somebody else so he speaks and
says to the other, That is an acacia tree. This statement is what we call in logic, the proposition.
Hence, judgment as the mental assertion of the relation between two ideas while proposition is the
external manifestation or expression of judgment.
General Notion of the Proposition
A proposition is defined as a statement in which anything whatsoever is affirmed or denied.
(a)
(b)
(c)
These are not propositions because in them nothing whatsoever is either affirmed or denied.
A proposition may also be defined as a discourse that expresses either truth or falsity. It is the
only kind of discourse that can be true or false in the strict sense, and every proposition is the one or
the other. Thus, it is the only discourse that you believe, assume, prove, refute, doubt, or deny.
2.
Note:
The kind of copula being employed is not the only distinction between the categorical and
hypothetical propositions.
absolute manner, without any conditionality. On the other hand, a hypothetical proposition expresses
a judgment which is qualified by a certain conditionality.
Again the truth expressed by a categorical proposition is verifiable by its conformity or non-conformity with
reality, while that of the hypothetical proposition depends on the correct formulation of the hypothetical
proposition itself and only by indirect reference to reality. Notice the difference in these two examples:
a. Categorical: A native of the Philippines is a Filipino.
The statement is a direct declaration of fact, which can be verified as true or false by reference
to objective reality.
b. Hypothetical: If he is a native of the Philippines, he is a Filipino.
Notice how the truth of he is a Filipino depends upon the truth of the conditionality, if he is a
native of the Philippines.
There are many other kinds of propositions existential and non-existential, simple and compound, causal,
inferential, and so on and so on but for the succeeding chapters we shall deal with the attributive or
categorical proposition.
consideration.
COPULA is the linking verb (is/am/are), which indicates the act of affirmation or negation.
Hence, it determines the quality of the proposition. Affirmative and negative are the two kinds of
quality that a proposition can have.
In the affirmative proposition, the copula joins, unites the predicate with the subject. On the other
hand, in the negative proposition, the copula separates or divides the predicate from the subject.
Tips in Determining the Quality of the Proposition:
1. If the proposition has no negative particle which modifies the copula, it is affirmative.
2. For a proposition to be negative, the negative particle (no, not, never) must modify the copula itself.
If the negative particle modifies either the subject or the predicate, but not the copula, the
proposition is affirmative.
Examples:
He who is not with me is against me. (Affirmative)
Those who have not been vaccinated are likely to get small pox. (Affirmative)
3. The negative particle of a negative proposition is usually located in the beginning of the proposition
or immediately after the copula.
Examples:
No man is an island. (Negative)
Not every man who retreats is a coward. (Negative)
A dog is never a cat. (Negative)
This is not easy. (Negative)
4. The use of two negative particles automatically makes the proposition affirmative.
Examples:
Nothing is not possible.
Not all students are not required to attend the seminar.
The quantity of the subject term determines the quantity of the proposition.
a. If the subject term is singular (standing for one definitely designated individual or group), the
proposition is singular.
b. If the subject term is particular (standing for an indeterminately designated portion of its
absolute extension), the proposition is particular.
c. If the subject term is universal (standing for each of the subjects to which it can be applied),
the proposition is universal.
d. If the subject term is indeterminate where the subject term is not modified by any sign of
singularity,
particularity
or
universality,
the
proposition
too
is
indeterminate.
The
The relation established between the terms in the proposition determines the quality of
the proposition.
a. If the relation established is that of identity, the quality of the proposition is affirmative.
b. If the relation established is that non-identity, the quality of the proposition is negative.
(Please refer to Tips in Determining the Quality of the Proposition)
If the predicate term is singular, the predicate term is singular. (See signs of Singularity)
Examples:
The Miami Heat are the 2006 NBA Champions.
Yao Ming is the tallest NBA player from China.
The 2006 NBA Finals MVP is Dwayne Wade.
4.
The quality of the proposition determines the quantity of the predicate term (PT) unless
the predicate term is singular.
a. If the proposition is affirmative, the predicate term is particular (unless PT is singular).
b. If the proposition is negative, the predicate term is universal (unless PT is singular).
Affirmative
Negative
Universal
and
Singular
Particular
The quantity and quality of the proposition determines the type of the proposition.
a.
b.
c.
d.
e.
f.
attributive proposition. Thus, we have the following forms of the attributive proposition:
1.
2.
3.
Su
is/are
P.
a P
Su is/are not P.
Ss
is/are
P.
Ss
is/are not P.
e P
S a P
The _____ is/are not _____. The man waiting outside the room is not my father.
This_____ is/are not _____. Those jerks are not my students.
(Proper noun) is/are not _____.
Lebanon is not a safe place anymore.
(Pronoun) is/are not _____. I am not going to resign as president.
(Superlative) is/are not _____.
The most productive city in Pampanga is San Fernando
No ______ is a _____.
No apple is an banana.
5.
6.
Sp
is/are
P.
S i P
Sp
S o P
is/are not P.