Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Mobile Broadband
Module 2:
IEEE mobile broadband technologies
Table of contents
2.1. WiFi network architectures.............................................................................2
2.2. IEEE 802.11 standard....................................................................................7
2.3. WiFi broadband (IEEE 802.11n/ac/ad) ........................................................12
2.3.1. IEEE 802.11n ........................................................................................12
2.3.2. IEEE 802.11ac ......................................................................................16
2.3.3. IEEE 802.11ad ......................................................................................19
2.4. Mobile WiMAX release 1 (IEEE 802.16e) ....................................................23
2.5. Mobile WiMAX release 2 (IEEE 802.16m) ...................................................28
2.6. Interworking of WiFi and mobile broadband networks .................................39
2.7. QoS in IEEE wireless and mobile networks .................................................43
2.7.1.
QoS in WiFi.......................................................................................44
Access point
Clients stations (e.g., lap-top, smartphone, etc.)
Switch or router (which connects WiFi network with the Internet)
Access Points
A special type of routing device that is used to transmit the data between wired
and wireless networking device is called as Access Point (AP). It is often
connected with the help of wired devices such as Ethernet. It only transmits or
transfers the data between wireless LAN and wired network by using infra
structure mode of network. One access point can only support a small group of
networks and works more efficiently. It is operated less than hundred feet. It is
denoted by AP.
Clients stations
Any kind of device such as personal computers, Note books, or any kind of
mobile devices which are inter linked with wireless network area referred as a
client of wireless LAN architecture.
Switch/Router
It is used to establish connections between wired network devices such as
Ethernet and different wireless networks such as wireless LAN. It is typically a
switch or a router. It acts as a point of control in wireless LAN architecture.
Two components are also some time play an important role in Wireless
LAN architecture i.e.:
- Basic Service Set (BSS)
- Extended Service Set (ESS)
Furthermore, the WLAN or WiFi is divided into three main parts on which
its whole working depends and all of its applications also depend on these parts.
These types are as follows;
1. Infrastructure mode
2. Ad hoc network mode
3. Mixed network mode.
Infrastructure Mode
Any kind of machine that can communicate with every type of work station of
WLAN (WiFi) with the help of access points is called as infra structure network
mode. When BSS's are interconnected the network becomes one with
infrastructure. The IEEE 802.11 infrastructure has several elements (see Figure
2.2). Two or more BSS's are interconnected using a Distribution System or DS
(e.g., Ethernet network). This concept of DS increases network coverage. Each
BSS becomes a component of an extended, larger network. Entry to the DS is
accomplished with the use of Access Points (AP). An access point is a station,
thus addressable. So, data moves between the BSS and the DS with the help of
these access points.
Creating large and complex networks using BSS's and DS's leads us to
the next level of hierarchy, the Extended Service Set or ESS. The beauty of the
ESS is the entire network looks like an independent basic service set to the
Logical Link Control layer (LLC). This means that stations within the ESS can
communicate or even move between BSSs transparently to the LLC.
Moreover, let we see which services are provided by DSS. There are the
following five services provided by the DSS:
Association
Reassociation
Disassociation
Distribution
Integration
The first three services deal with station mobility. If a station is moving
within its own BSS or is not moving, the stations mobility is termed No-transition.
If a station moves between BSS's within the same ESS, its mobility is termed
BSS-transition. If the station moves between BSS's of differing ESS's it is ESS
transition. A station must affiliate itself with the BSS infrastructure if it wants to
use the LAN. This is done by Associating itself with an access point. Associations
are dynamic in nature because stations move, turn on or turn off. A station can
only be associated with one AP. This ensures that the DS always knows where
the station is. Association supports no-transition mobility but is not enough to
support BSS-transition. Enter Reassociation. This service allows the station to
switch its association from one AP to another. Both association and reassociation
are initiated by the station. Disassociation is when the association between the
station and the AP is terminated. This can be initiated by either party. A
disassociated station cannot send or receive data. ESS-transition are not
supported. A station can move to a new ESS but will have to reinitiate
connections.
Distribution and Integration are the remaining DSS's. Distribution is simply
getting the data from the sender to the intended receiver. The message is sent to
the local AP (input AP), then distributed through the DS to the AP (output AP)
that the recipient is associated with. If the sender and receiver are in the same
BSS, the input and out AP's are the same. So the distribution service is logically
invoked whether the data is going through the DS or not. Integration is when the
output AP is a portal. Thus, 802.x LANs are integrated into the 802.11 DS.
Furthermore, in the next section we are presenting more details about the
WLAN standards, their specifications and performances.
case for this technology will typically be for longer distance, point-to-point,
backhaul communication using 802.11.
IEEE Std 802.11w-2009: Protected Management Frames (Amendment 4):
802.11w specifies methods to increase the security of 802.11
management frames. Management frames are 802.11 packets that control
communication on the WLAN, but do not contain data. Examples include
beacons, RTS/CTS, probe responses, acknowledgements, etc. Currently
management frames are sent in the clear making them potentially
vulnerable to malicious manipulation.
IEEE Std 802.11n-2009: Enhancements for Higher Throughput
(Amendment 5): this amendment will be discussed in the following Section
1.6.
IEEE Std 802.11p-2010: Wireless Access in Vehicular Environments
(Amendment 6): 802.11p deals with data exchange between high-speed
vehicles, and between vehicles and a yet-to-exist roadside WLAN
infrastructure based on licensed spectrum in the 5.85 5.925GHz band.
Though the plans for this technology seem quite grandiose, activity in this
area has been quite limited to date, and obviously has no affect on
enterprise WLAN users. Any WLAN analysis capabilities for 802.11p are
likely to be very specific to this particular application.
IEEE Std 802.11z-2010: Extensions to Direct-Link Setup (DLS)
(Amendment 7): Direct link setup (DLS) allows WLAN client devices to
connect directly to each other, bypassing the typical link through an
infrastructure AP. This has many benefits, including an increase in speed
(between the clients), an increase in network throughput (for all users),
and an increase in overall service delivery, especially for multimedia (like
a computer to DVR connection or a laptop to projector connection).
IEEE Std 802.11v-2011: IEEE 802.11 Wireless Network Management
(Amendment 8): 802.11v provides a mechanism for wireless clients to
share information about the WLAN environment with each other and APs
to improve WLAN network performance in real time. Most client devices
do not yet take advantage of this new capability, but as compatible
devices (both client and infrastructure) come to market the need to
analyze 802.11v packets will become very important, especially in
determining if the information shared is really resulting in anticipated
improvements.
IEEE Std 802.11u-2011: Interworking with External Networks (Amendment
9): This is an extremely hot topic in mobile computing, and one that will
continue to get tremendous attention. It also requires solutions to some
pretty difficult problems, including discovery, authentication, authorization,
and compatibility, hence progress towards implementation has been
slower than anticipated.
IEEE Std 802.11s-2011: Mesh Networking (Amendment 10): Mesh
networking specifies an architecture and protocol for WLANs that use
radio-aware metrics over self-configuring multi-hop topologies. Essentially,
802.11s enables the creation of high-performing, scalable, ad-hoc
networks, often with no wired network access at all. One of the most
widely discussed use cases is in emergency services, like those provided
by the Federal Emergency Management Agency, where a scalable
network needs to be set up very quickly in a remote area for a finite period
of time. It is highly unlikely that enterprise customers will take advantage
of mesh technology. WLAN analysis of mesh environments is likely to be
highly specialized and mostly transient, so theres no need for the typical
enterprise-focused WLAN analysis system to deal with 802.11s, at least
not anytime soon.
As a result of publishing the 802.11-2012 revision, all of the previously
published amendments and revisions are now retired. In IEEE Std 802.11-2012,
the order of clauses and annexes has also been revised. The result of this
revised order on the numbering of clauses and annexes is summarized in Figure
2.5. The IEEE 802.11-2012 standard has wide range of purposes. In particular,
the standard:
Describes the functions and services required by an IEEE 802.11compliant device to operate within independent and infrastructure
networks as well as the aspects of STA mobility (transition) within those
networks.
Describes the functions and services that allow an IEEE 802.11-compliant
device to communicate directly with another such device outside of an
independent or infrastructure network.
Defines the MAC procedures to support the MAC service data unit
(MSDU) delivery services.
Defines several PHY signalling techniques and interface functions that are
controlled by the IEEE 802.11 MAC.
Permits the operation of an IEEE 802.11-conformant device within a
wireless local area network (WLAN) that may coexist with multiple
overlapping IEEE 802.11 WLANs.
Describes the requirements and procedures to provide data confidentiality
of user information and MAC management information being transferred
over the wireless medium (WM) and authentication of IEEE 802.11conformant devices.
Defines mechanisms for dynamic frequency selection (DFS) and transmit
power control (TPC) that may be used to satisfy regulatory requirements
for operation in any band.
Defines the MAC procedures to support local area network (LAN)
applications with quality-of-service (QoS) requirements, including the
transport of voice, audio, and video.
Defines mechanisms and services for wireless network management of
STAs that include BSS transition management, channel usage and
coexistence, collocated interference reporting, diagnostic, multicast
diagnostic and event reporting, flexible multicast, efficient beacon
mechanisms, proxy ARP advertisement, location, timing measurement,
10
throughput. The PHY (physical layer) and MAC (a software layer) components of
802.11-2012 is reworked in order to provide that impressive speed. Those and
many novel changes will also allow for new additions like "mesh" networking,
changes in security, broadcast/multicast/unicast data delivery and additional
network management features.
11
Effect
Packet Aggregation
Block Acknowledgements
Channel Bonding and
Coding Schemes
Spatial Multiplexing
12
13
Similarly, there are eight data rates provided for each transmitter, 32 in
total, for the 40 MHz channel. 802.11n can also use a short guard interval that is
400 nanoseconds long, instead of 800 nanoseconds. This slightly increases the
maximum data rates, for example in 40 MHz channels, to 150 Mbps per
transmitter. A four-transmitter 802.11n radio operating with 40 MHz channels and
using the short guard interval can therefore deliver a maximum of 600 Mbps.
Also, the IEEE 802.11n standard includes the ability for the receiver to
combine the received signals from multiple antennas to reassemble a single
spatial stream. Multipath echoes in an environment can lead to frequency
selective fading, in which certain subcarriers within a 20 MHz or 40 MHz signal
are stronger than others. Maximal-ratio combining (MRC) enables the receiver to
correlate the signal reception from multiple antennas and select the strongest of
each antenna before decoding a particular subcarrier.
In order to reduce the MAC overhead, 802.11n introduces frame
aggregation. Frame aggregation is essentially putting two or more frames
together into a single transmission. 802.11n introduces two methods for frame
aggregation: Mac Service Data Units (MSDU) aggregation and Message Protocol
Data Unit (MPDU) aggregation. Both aggregation methods reduce the overhead
to only a single radio preamble for each frame transmission (see Figure 2.7).
destination; that is, all the frames in the aggregated frame must be addressed to
the same mobile client or access point. Another limitation is that all the frames to
be aggregated have to be ready to transmit from the client or access point at the
same time, potentially delaying some frames to wait for additional frames, in
order to attempt to send a single aggregate frame. A third limitation of
aggregation is that the maximum frame size that can be successfully sent is
affected by a factor called channel coherence time.
Theoretically, MSDU aggregation allows frames for many destinations to
be collected into a single aggregated frame for transmission. Practically,
however, MSDU aggregation collects Ethernet frames for a common destination,
wraps the collection in a single 802.11 frame, and then transmits that 802.11wrapped collection of Ethernet frames (see Figure 2.8). This method is more
efficient than MPDU aggregation, because the Ethernet header is much shorter
than the 802.11 header.
MPDU aggregation does require that all the 802.11 frames that constitute
the aggregated frame have the same destination address. However, this results
in the same behavior as MSDU aggregation, since the destination of all frames
sent by a mobile client is that clients access point, where the 802.11 frames are
translated to Ethernet and forwarded to the ultimate destination. Similarly, the
destination of any frame sent by the access point is a single mobile client.
15
Nominal
Configuration
Bandwidth
(MHz)
Number
of
Spatial
Streams
Typical
(minimum)
20
64QAM
65
46
Low-end
20
64QAM
72
51
Mid-tier
40
64QAM
300
210
High-end
40
64QAM
450
320
Amendment max
40
64QAM
600
420
Modulation
Physical Data
Rate (Mbit/s)
Throughput
(Mbit/s)*
capable of a data rate of about 293 Mbps. A device that implements all optional
parameters (160 MHz bandwidth, 8 spatial streams, 256QAM 5/6 with short
guard interval) will be able to achieve over 6 Gbps.
17
Bandwidth
(MHz)
Number
of
Spatial
Streams
Modulation
Physical Data
Rate (Mbit/s)
Throughput
(Mbit/s)*
Typical
(minimum)
80
64QAM
293
210
Low-end
80
256QAM
433
300
Mid-tier
80
256QAM
867
610
High-end
80
256QAM
1300
910
Amendment max
80
256QAM
3470
2400
Low-end
160
256QAM
867
610
Mid-tier
160
256QAM
1730
1200
High-end
160
256QAM
2600
1800
Ultra-high-end
160
256QAM
3470
2400
Amendment max
160
256QAM
6930
4900
Nominal
Configuration
19
Unlike the 2.4 GHz and 5 GHz unlicensed bands, the 60 GHz area is also
relatively uncongested.
Transmission at 60 GHz covers less distance for a given power, mainly
due to the increased free space path loss (loss over 1 m at 60 GHz is 68 dB,
which is 21.6 dB worse than at 5 GHz), compounded by propagation losses
through materials and human body shadowing (losses from a few dB to 30 dB+).
The substantial RF absorption peak in the 60 GHz band due to a
resonance of atmospheric oxygen molecules is often cited as a limitation on
range in this band, but this absorption effect only starts to become significant at
>100 m range, which is not really relevant to the low-power transmissions being
discussed here.
So low-power transmissions will not propagate very far, but this is
considered an advantage. It reduces the likelihood of co-channel interference
and increases the possible frequency re-use density. Another perceived
advantage of limited range is the reduced opportunity for theft of protected
content by eavesdropping on nearby transmissions.
Multiple-antenna configurations using beam-steering are an optional
feature of the 802.11ad specifications. Beam-steering can be employed to
circumnavigate minor obstacles like people moving around a room or a piece of
furniture blocking line-of-sight transmission, but longer free-space distances (e.g.
> 10 m) and more substantial obstructions (e.g. walls, doors, etc.) will prevent
transmission.
It would be unlikely, for example, for a media server in one room to be
able to reliably transmit HD video directly to a display in another, but it could be
in the same room (example use case scenario for home is given in Figure 2.11).
Media
server
Switchable interface
Set-top box
FTTH
AP
20
21
Discussion
The WiFi technology evolution is shown WiFi bitrates depend upon the
access scheme and modulation and coding schemes:
Maximum bitrates for different IEEE 802.11 standards on physical layer
(i.e., b, g/s, n, ac) are given in the Table 2.5.
In reality, bitrates can be much lower at higher distances between Access
Point and wireless stations (e.g., lap-top, smartphone with WiFi, etc.), i.e.,
lower signal to noise ratio
o Typical coverage area of WiFi on 2.4 GHz is several tens of meters
(e.g., home, office area) due to limited signal power (typically below
100 mW).
o WiFi on 5 GHz is typically allowed to have up to 1 W output power,
hence it may have bigger coverage area (typically used as
backbone for APs operating on 2.4 GHz).
Table 2.5. Comparison of WiFi bitrates on physical layer
WiFi standard
Bitrate
Frequency bands
IEEE 802.11
Up to 2 Mbit/s
2.4 GHz
IEEE 802.11b
Up to 11 Mbit/s
2.4 GHz
IEEE 802.11a
Up to 54 Mbit/s
5 GHz
IEEE 802.11g
Up to 54 Mbit/s
2.4 GHz
IEEE 802.11n
Up to 600 Mbit/s
IEEE 802.11ac
Up to 6.93 Gbit/s
5 GHz
22
23
24
25
26
greater than 120 km/hr with QoS comparable to broadband wireline access
alternatives.
Table 2.6. Major spectrum allocations for 3G mobile WiMAX worldwide.
Region
Frequency
bands (GHz)
North America
Europe
2.5; 5.8
Asia Pacific
General comment
27
28
30
Furthermore, the MAC functional group includes functional blocks that are
related to physical layer and link controls such as:
PHY control: This block performs PHY signalling such as ranging,
channel quality measurement/feedback (CQI), and hybrid automatic
repeat request (HARQ) acknowledgment (ACK) or negative
acknowledgment (NACK) signalling.
Control signalling: This block generates resource-allocation messages
such as DL/UL medium-access protocol (MAP), as well as specific
control signalling messages, and other signalling messages not in the
form of general MAC messages (e.g., a DL frame control header).
Sleep mode management: This block handles sleep mode operation and
generates management messages related to sleep operation and can
communicate with the scheduler block to operate properly according to
the sleep period.
Quality-of-service (QoS): This block performs rate control based on QoS
input parameters from the connection management function for each
connection.
Scheduling and resource multiplexing: This block schedules and
multiplexes packets based on the properties of the connections.
Automatic repeat request (ARQ): This block performs the MAC ARQ
function. For ARQ-enabled connections, the ARQ block splits MSDUs
logically and sequences logical ARQ blocks.
Fragmentation/packing: This block performs the fragmentation or
packing of MSDUs based on input from the scheduler block.
MAC PDU formation: This block constructs MAC protocol data units
(PDUs) so that a BS/MS can transmit user traffic or management
messages via PHY channels.
The IEEE 802.16m protocol structure is similar to that of IEEE 802.16 with
additional functional blocks for new features including the following:
Relay functions: Relay functionality and packet routing in relay networks
Self-organization and self-optimization functions: a plug-and-play form of
operation for an indoor BS (i.e., a femtocell).
Multi-carrier functions: Control and operation of a number of adjacent or
non-adjacent radio-frequency (RF) carriers where the RF carriers can be
assigned to unicast and/or multicast and broadcast services. A single
MAC instantiation is used to control several physical layers. If the MS
supports multi-carrier operation, it can receive control and signalling,
broadcast, and synchronization channels through a primary carrier, and
traffic assignments can be made on the secondary carriers. A
generalization of the protocol structure for multi-carrier support using a
single MAC instantiation is shown in Figure 2.15. The load-balancing
functions and the RF-carrier mapping and control are performed by the
radio-resource control and management functional class. From the
31
Figure 2.15. IEEE 802.16m multicarrier protocol stack and frame structure.
Based on the primary and/or secondary usage, the carriers of a multicarrier system can be configured differently as follows:
Fully configured carrier: A carrier for which all control channels
including synchronization, broadcast, multicast, and unicast control
signalling are configured. The information and parameters related to
multi-carrier operation and the other carriers also can be included in
the control channels.
Partially configured carrier: A carrier with only essential control-channel
configuration to support traffic exchanges during multicarrier operation.
If the user-terminal RF front end and/or its baseband is not capable of
processing more than one RF carrier simultaneously, the user terminal
may be allowed, in certain intervals, to monitor secondary RF carriers
and to resume monitoring of the primary carrier prior to transmission of
the synchronization, broadcast, and nonuser-specific control channels.
32
It is well known that the IEEE 802.16m uses OFDMA as the multiple
access scheme in the DL and UL. It further supports both time-division duplex
(TDD) and frequency-division duplex (FDD) schemes including the half-duplex
FDD (HFDD) operation of the mobile stations in the FDD networks. Also, IEEE
802.16m identified new frequency bands for FDD and TDD deployment of
systems (see Table 2.8).
Table 2.8. IEEE 802.16m frequency bands
33
When it comes a word about modulation and coding in the IEEE 802.16m
we can say that it supports quadrature-phase shift keying (QPSK), 16-QAM, and
64-QAM modulation schemes in the DL and UL. The performance of adaptive
modulation generally suffers from the power inefficiencies of multilevelmodulation formats. This is due to the variations in bit reliabilities caused by the
bit-mapping onto the signal constellation. To overcome this issue, a constellation
rearrangement scheme is utilized where a signal constellation of quadrature
amplitude modulation (QAM) signals between retransmissions is rearranged; that
is, the mapping of the bits onto the complex-valued symbols between successive
HARQ retransmissions is changed, resulting in averaging the bit reliabilities over
several retransmissions and lower packet-error rates. The mapping of bits to the
constellation point depends on the constellation rearrangement type used for
HARQ retransmissions and also can depend on the MIMO scheme. The
complex-valued modulated symbols are mapped to the input of the MIMO
encoder. Incremental-redundancy HARQ is used in determining the starting
position of the bit selection for HARQ retransmissions.
Furthermore, IEEE 802.16m supports several advanced multi-antenna
techniques including single and multi-user MIMO (spatial multiplexing and beamforming) as well as a number of transmit diversity schemes. In single-user MIMO
(SU-MIMO) scheme only one user can be scheduled over one resource unit,
while in multi-user MIMO (MU-MIMO), multiple users can e scheduled in one
resource unit. Single-user MIMO (SU-MIMO) schemes are used to improve the
link performance, by providing robust transmissions with spatial diversity, or large
spatial multiplexing gain and peak data rate to a single MS, or beam-forming
gain. Both open-loop SU-MIMO and closed-loop SU-MIMO is supported in 16m.
For open-loop SU-MIMO, both spatial multiplexing and transmit diversity
schemes are supported. For closed-loop SU-MIMO, codebook based pre-coding
is supported for both TDD and FDD systems. CQI, PMI, and rank feedback can
be transmitted by the mobile station to assist the base stations scheduling,
resource allocation, and rate adaptation decisions. CQI, PMI, and rank feedback
may or may not be frequency dependent. For closed-loop SU-MIMO, sounding
based pre-coding is supported for TDD systems.
On the other side, multi-user MIMO (MU-MIMO) schemes are used to
enable resource allocation to communicate data to two or more MSs. MU-MIMO
enhances the system throughput. Multi-user transmission with one stream per
user is supported in MU-MIMO mode. MU-MIMO includes the MIMO
configuration of 2Tx antennas to support up to 2 users, and 4Tx or 8Tx antennas
to support up to 4 users. Both unitary and non-unitary MU-MIMO linear precoding techniques are supported.
For open-loop MU-MIMO, CQI and preferred stream index feedback may
be transmitted to assist the base stations scheduling, transmission mode
switching, and rate adaptation. The CQI is frequency dependent. For closed-loop
multi -user MIMO, codebook based pre-coding is supported for both TDD and
FDD systems. CQI and PMI feedback can be transmitted by the mobile station to
assist the base stations scheduling, resource allocation, and rate adaptation
decisions. CQI and PMI feedback may or may not be frequency dependent. For
34
closed-loop multi -user MIMO, sounding based pre-coding is supported for TDD
systems. In Figure 2.16 is given a basic comparison of SU-MIMO and MU-MIMO.
Multi-BS MIMO techniques are supported in IEEE 802.16m for improving
sector throughput and cell-edge throughput through multi-BS collaborative
precoding, network coordinated beamforming, or inter-cell interference nulling.
Both open-loop and closed-loop multi-BS MIMO techniques can be considered.
For closed-loop multi-BS MIMO, CSI feedback via codebook based feedback or
sounding channel will be used. The feedback information may be shared by
neighbouring BSs via network interface. This places significant obligation in low
latency backhauls.
a)
b)
Figure 2.16. Examples of SU-MIMO (a) and MU-MIMO (b).
35
The comparison between different parameters of IEEE 802.16m and LTEAdvanced is given in Table 2.9.
Table 2.9. Comparison of IEEE 802.16m and LTE-Advanced
Parameter
IEEE 802.16m
LTE-Advanced
Spectrum allocation
Up to 100MHz
Up to 20-100 MHz
Latency
MIMO technique
Downlink: up to 8x8
Uplink: up to 4x4
Downlink: up to 8x8
Uplink: up to 4x8
Peak Spectral
efficiency (bit/s/Hz)
Mobility support
Access Scheme
DL: OFDMA
UL: OFDMA
DL: OFDMA
UL: SC-FDMA
Further, the comparison of bitrates for Mobile WiMAX (3G and 4G) and
related 3GPP technologies is given in Table 2.10. Again, The given data rates in
table below are theoretically maximums.
In practice, the available bitrates to end mobile users depend upon several
factors, such as mobility, distance from the base station, capabilities of the
terminals, as well as number of users which simultaneously are using the same
mobile network.
36
Downstream
direction
(max.)
Upstream
direction
(max.)
Frequency
bandwidth
(FDD)
Standard
Development
Organization
Mobile
Generation
UMTS/HSPA+
(Release 8)
42 Mbit/s
11.5
Mbit/s
2x5 MHz
3GPP
3G
UMTS/HSPA+
(Release 10)
168 Mbit/s
46 Mbit/s
2x20 MHz
(each 4x5
MHz)
3GPP
3G
LTE (Release 8)
300 Mbit/s
75 Mbit/s
2x20 MHz
3GPP
3.9G/4G
3 Gbit/s
1.5 Gbit/s
2x100 MHz
3GPP
4G
141 Mbit/s
138 Mbit/s
2x20 MHz
IEEE,
WiMAX Forum
3G
365 Mbit/s
376 Mbit/s
2x20 MHz
IEEE,
WiMAX Forum
4G
>1 Gbit/s
>100
Mbit/s
2x100 MHz
IEEE,
WiMAX Forum
4G
Mobile network
LTE-Advanced
IEEE 802.16m introduces advanced features in the radio interface that are
similar to those introduced by LTE-Advanced, such as carrier aggregation,
femtocells, Self-Organizing Network (SON), relay, etc.
Carrier aggregation for IEEE 802.16m is based on the same principles
as the one given for LTE-Advanced, with same possible width of component
carriers. So, IEEE 802.16m provides carrier aggregation with up to 5 component
carriers, each carrier up to 20 MHz, and maximum spectrum allocation of up to
100 MHz, which satisfies the IMT-Advanced requirements for user bit rates.
Femtocell base stations are small-scale and low-cost devices installed in
subscribers' premises which enable high bitrates due to small distance between
the mobile devices and the femtocell base stations (similar to Home eNodeB). In
such scenario, the control of the radio functionalities and QoS provisioning to the
user is enabled by core network connections established over fixed broadband
access such as xDSL, PON, etc.
Self-Organizing Network (SON) defines neighbor discovery, interference
mitigation and load balancing features, which are particularly useful for femtocell
deployments due to difficulties for implementation of femtocell parameters in
unknown site locations (e.g., carrier frequency, transmitting power, etc.).
Relays increase coverage by closing blind areas in unfavorable radio
environments. Relay stations are simplified low-cost base stations with limited
capabilities which have repeater functionality. IEEE 802.16m supports multi-hop
relaying (i.e., relaying over several relay stations).
37
In general, all advanced features in the radio network are being supported
in parallel by both Mobile WiMAX 2.0 and LTE-Advanced.
Femtocells are viewed as a promising option for mobile operators to
improve coverage and provide high-data-rate services in a cost-effective manner.
The idea is to overlay low-power and low-cost base station devices, Femto-APs,
on the existing cellular network, where each Femto-AP provides high-speed
wireless connection to subscribers within a small range.
An example network structure for an WiMAX release 2 system with
Femto-APs is illustrated in Figure 2.18.
38
39
40
Figure 2.21. Ruckus SCG enabled handover and roaming with 3G 3GPP
networks.
41
Figure 2.22. Trusted WiFi access integration with the packet core network.
Figure 2.23. Untrusted WiFi access integration with the packet core network.
Voice over WiFi can be integrated with the Mobile Packet Core, allowing
harmonized and secure traffic handling for both mobile and WiFi access. This
enables features such as policy control and quality of service traffic
management. Operators can even offer voice call continuity (VCC) between the
Liquid Core and WiFi networks through SR-VCC and evolve towards VoLTE.
Finally, the growing mobile broadband data traffic, driven by high-end
smartphones and tablets, presents difficult strategic challenges to operators in
meeting demand with finite radio spectrum.
For many broadband operators, there is a real opportunity to address the
challenge by leveraging their existing Packet Core and Evolved Packet Core
infrastructure to integrate user-plane traffic from WiFi access. By balancing
selected customers mobile broadband traffic between the mobile broadband
network and Internet WiFi access points, operators can avoid congestion of their
cellular and backhaul networks. This in turn leads to reduced need for capital
expenditure and also helps to reduce operational costs.
42
43
Figure 2.24. MAC layer QoS enhancement schemes for IEEE 802.11-based wireless
networks.
44
Low priority
backoff
AIFS(AC)
PIFS
Middle priority
backoff
SIFS
ACK
High priority
DATA
RTS
time
CTS
Contention Window
SIFS
SIFS
45
using different AIFS (Arbitration Inter-Frame Spacing) for different ACs (shorter
AIFS for higher priority ACs and longer AIFS for lower priority ACs).
Table 2.11 Access Categories (AC) for IEEE 802.11e
Priority
Designation
(Informative)
Best Effort
Best Effort
Best Effort
Video Probe
Video
Video
Voice
Voice
AC1
AC2
AC3
AC4
Virtual collisions
Transmission
Figure 2.26. Virtual collisions of fours Access Categories (AC) that happen at the AP
(Access Point) that has IEEE 802.11e capabilities for QoS support
46
CWmin
CWmax
AIFSN
Max TXOP
Background
15
1023
Best Effort
15
1023
Video
15
3.008 ms
Voice
1.504 ms
PIFS
DATA
AIFS
Ack
SIFS
DATA
AIFS
Figure 2.27 Interrelation between different Inter-Frame Space intervals in WiFi in respect
of QoS schemes
47
HC
PIFS
HCCA
EDCA
Overall, HCCA is rarely used for QoS in WiFi. So, if QoS is needed in WiFi
network, 802.11e is implemented with its EDCA scheme. That way is possible to
provide VoIP over WiFi and even IPTV over WiFi with certain guarantees on
QoS, thus making possible WiFi to be used for offloading in mobile networks,
including 3GPP mobile networks and fixed and mobile WiMAX from the IEEE.
48
Figure 2.29. QoS establishment between WiMAX mobile stations, WiMAX base stations
and ASN (Access Service Network) Gateway in WiMAX core network.
49
Traffic type
Non-real-time Polling
Service (nrtPS)
Best-Effort (BE)
50
Unlike UGS and rtPS scheduling services, nrtPS and BE are designed for
applications that do not have any specific delay requirement. The main difference
between the two is that nrtPS connections are reserved a minimum amount of
bandwidth (by means of the minimum reserved traffic rate parameter), which can
boost performance of bandwidth-intensive applications, such as File Transfer
Protocol (FTP). Both nrtPS and BE uplink connections request bandwidth by
either responding to broadcast polls from the BS or piggybacking a bandwidth
request on an outgoing PDU. Additionally, the BS grants unicast polls to nrtPS
connections at a time-scale of one second or less.
IEEE 802.16m Advanced Air Interface (AAI), provides a more flexible
and efficient QoS framework with the introduction of adaptive Granting and
Polling (aGP) service. It provides quick access, delayed Bandwidth Request
(BR), and priority controlled access. The aGP was introduced in 4G Mobile
WiMAX because UGS, ertPS, and rtPS are not efficient for applications such as
online games, VoIP with adaptive multi-rate (AMR), and delay-sensitive TCP
based services, and therefore more flexible QoS scheduling service is needed to
support the adaptation of both the allocation size and inter-arrival.
Finally, one can conclude that the QoS plays a major role in the mobile
and wireless broadband networks, which are therefore important also in IEEE
mobile and wireless broadband networks. We have seen that the WiFi networks
are providing very high data rates, but less mobility (only nomadic mobility in a
local area) and on the other hand the Mobile WiMAX broadband networks are
providing a very high mobility, but not so high data rates in comparison with the
WiFi (WLANs). Logically, the combination of all IEEE mobile broadband
technologies, in particularly the WiFi and Mobile WiMAX networks, will result in a
mobile broadband networks with a very high data rate as well as mobility support
anywhere-anytime-on any mobile devices with both WiFi and WiMAX
capabilities. However, WiFi is the most spread wireless networks regarding the
number of installed APs on a global scale, while Mobile WiMAX is influenced by
competitive technologies from the 3GPP, which also support the QoS using
different frameworks than IEEE broadband technologies.
51
53
multicast video and on-demand services (VoD) for mobile devices. In the
medium to long term, a new ecosystem with open architecture mobile devices
paralleling the cellular mobile networks, but without the legacy architectures and
proprietary elements, is on the horizon. New players not currently owning
telecom networks are expected to take this initiative.
54
technologies from IEEE and 3GPP (IMT currently includes IMT-2000 and IMTAdvanced families). However
Table 2.14 IMT spectrum
Spectrum
(MHz)
Band
name
D1
D3
D4
D5
450-454.8
451.325455.725
452-456.475
452.5-457.475
453-457.5
698-960
5.525
5.025
5.5
D6
455.25-459.975
5.275
D7
D8
D9
D10
A1
A2
A3
A5
A6
450-457.5
None
450-455
451-458
824-849
880-915
832-862
698-716
776-793
703-748
None
B1
17102200
B2
B3
1920-1980
130
2110-2170
190
1710-1785
1850-1910
1710-1785
1920-1980
1850-1910
1710-1770
20
20
20
130
20
340
1805-1880
1930-1990
1805-1880
2110-2170
1930-1990
2110-2170
95
80
95
190
80
400
E1
None
None
2300-2400
C1
2500-2570
50
2620-2690
120
C2
2500-2570
50
2620-2690
120
2570-2620
2570-2620,
FDD
external DL
C3
F1
F2
None
3410-3490
B4
B5
23002400
25002690
34003600
Un-paired
bands (TDD)
(MHz)
5.0
10.0
3.0
20
10
11
12
13
10
-
A4
5.2
UL-DL
separation
(MHz)
460-464.8
461.325465.725
462-466.475
462.5-467.475
463-467.5
465.250469.975
462.5-470
None
465-470
461-468
869-894
925-960
791-821
728-746
746-763
758-803
None
D2
450-470
Uplink - UL
(MHz)
5.6
10
None
10
None
10
10
10
None
None
None
10
None
12.5
15
10
45
45
41
30
30
55
-
None
450-470
457.5-462.5
None
None
None
None
716-728
None
698-806
1880-1920;
2010-2025
None
1910-1930
1880-1920;
2010-2025
1910-1930
3400-3600
None
Considering the spectrum, one can conclude that the spectrum reform is a
priority globally. This is driven in large part by the burgeoning of mobile
broadband and the progression towards 4G Mobile WiMAX (from the WiMAX
point of view, although its future is still not certain toward the long term vision
beyond 2020). Greater regulatory certainty around band re-planning and the
structure of new spectrum allocations is demanded as operators seek a firm
55
basis upon which to assess future bandwidth requirements and how they can be
met. Rearrangement of current bands allocated to mobile services and the
release of unallocated spectrum will present different challenges and degrees of
challenges in different nations. However, at the very least, all nations need to
move to auditing spectrum distribution and use across multiple bands and public
and private sector players.
On the side of WiFi, it is the most used technology worldwide for wireless
access to Internet in a local area network (e.g., home, office, public places, etc.).
Since a decade ago, public WiFi hotspots have appeared at many different
hotspots (e.g., airports, malls, hotels, cafeterias, even whole city areas were
covered with WiFi). However, WiFi is cheap, but it lacks mobility (no TDMA
support as 3G and 4G mobile broadband networks have, either from 3GPP or
WiMAX from the IEEE) and has limited QoS support (i.e., there are not exact
QoS guarantees possible, but mainly better service for one Access Category in
IEEE 802.11e than for other one). On the other side, WiFi Access Points are
cheap (since they do not TDMA support in the wireless link) and operate in the
unlicensed bands (no spectrum fees), hence they are irreplaceable nowadays
and together with Ethernet (IEEE 802.3) for fixed local access in the last meters,
provide unified local access to Internet. On the others side, certain operators use
WiFi networks for traffic offload from their mobile networks, especially in high
dense urban areas where capacity is scarce for the mobile broadband access.
Short summary
The mobile broadband with bitrates comparable with the fixed broadband
access is becoming reality with the 4G mobile networks.
LTE-Advanced and Mobile WiMAX 2.0 are 4G technologies providing
higher bitrates to end-users as well as many advances in radio network and in
the core network for higher quality of the services. However, in mobile
environments this goes along with allocation of more spectrum and mechanisms
for even higher spectral efficiency to have higher available bitrates in the future.
WiFi as low-cost technology in unlicensed spectrum is used for traffic
offload from 3G/4G mobile networks as well as for hotspot implementations.
56
Abbreviations
3GPP 3rd Generation Partnership Project
3G Third Generation
4G Fourth Generation
5G Fifth Generation
AP Access Point
BTS Base Transceiver Station
BE Best Effort
CDN Content Delivery Network
COMP - Coordinated multi-point
DNS Domain Name System
ET Emergency Telecommunications
ETS Emergency Telecommunications Service
FI Functional Interface
GPS Global Positioning System
GTP GPRS Tunneling Protocol
HA Home Agent
HSPA High Speed Packet Access
IAM Identity and Access Management
ICT Information and Communication Technology
ID Identifier
IP Internet Protocol
IPv4 (IP version 4)
IPv6 (IP version 6)
ISP Internet service provider
IT Information Technology
LAN Local Area Network
LBS Location Base Service
LTE Long Term Evolution
LTS Location Trusted Server
MAUI Memory Arithmetic Unit and Interface
MVNO mobile virtual network operator
NRA National Regulatory Agencies
NTP Network Time Protocol
nrtPS non-real-time polling service
OS Operating System
P2P Peer-to-Peer
QoE Quality of Experience
QoS Quality of Service
rtPS real-time polling service
SIM Subscriber Identity Module
SLA Service Level Agreement
SMI Service Management Interface
UGS Unsolicited Grant Service
URI Uniform Resource Identifier
57
58
References
[1] Toni Janevski, "Internet Technologies for Fixed and Mobile Networks", Artech House,
USA, November 2015.
[2] Toni Janevski, "NGN Architectures, Protocols and Services", John Wiley & Sons, UK,
April 2014.
[3] http://www.tutorial-reports.com/wireless/wlanwifi/wifi_architecture.php
[4] http://www.wifinotes.com/wlan-architecture.html.
[5] IEEE Computer Society and the IEEE Microwave Theory and Techniques Society:
IEEE Std 802.16m-2011 Standard for local and metropolitan area networks, 2011.
[6] Wireless LAN Design Guide for High Density Client Environments in Higher ducation,
CISCO 2011
[7] Meraki White Paper: 802.11n Technology, February 2011.
[8] WLAN Security: Simplifying Without Compromising, Ruckus Wireless | White Paper,
2011.
[9] Eldad Perahia, Michelle X. Gong, "Gigabit Wireless LANs: an overview of IEEE
802.11ac and 802.11ad", Newsletter ACM SIGMOBILE Mobile Computing and
Communications Review, Volume 15 Issue 3, July 2011, Pages 23-33.
[10] IEEE 802.11ac: What Does it Mean for Test?, White Paper of LitePoint, A Teradyne
Company. 2012.
[11] What you need to know about 802.11ac, White Paper from Motorola Solutions, July
2012.
[12] http://litepoint.com/whitepaper/80211ac_Whitepaper.pdf
[13] 802.11ac: Very High Throughput, White Paper from Ruckus, February 2013.
[14] IEEE Std 802.11ad-2013, Part 11: Wireless LAN Medium Access Control (MAC)
and Physical Layer (PHY) Specifications, Amendment 3: Enhancements for Very High
Throughput in the 60 GHz Band, Institute of Electronic Engineers, December 2012
[15] IEEE Std 802.11ad-2013, Part 11: Wireless LAN Medium Access Control (MAC)
and Physical Layer (PHY) Specifications, Amendment 4: Enhancements for Very High
Throughput for Operation in Bands below 6 GHz, Institute of Electronic Engineers,
2013.
[16] IEEE 802.11n-2009Amendment 5: Enhancements for Higher Throughput. IEEESA. 29 October 2009.
[17] Broadcom corporation, 802.11n: Next-Generation Wireless LAN Technology, April
2006.
[18] Chris Thomas, Raj Jain, 802.16m and WiMAX Release 2.0, 2010.
[19] Yaghoobi, Hassan, "Mobile WiMAX Update and IEEE 802.16m," IEEE, 2009.
[20] A. Bacioccola, C. Cicconetti, C. Eklund, L. Lenzini, Z. Li, E. Mingozzi, "IEEE 802.16:
History, Status and Future Trends", Computer Communications, Volume 33, Issue 2,
Pages 113-123, 15 February 2010.
59
[21] Srinivasan, Roshni (ed), Hamiti, Shkumbin (ed), "IEEE 802.16m System Description
Document (SDD)," IEEE 802.16 Task Group m, September 2009.
[22] Shantanu Pathak and Shagun Batra, "Next Generation 4G WiMAX Networks - IEEE
802.16 Standard", Sundarapandian et al. (Eds), pp. 507518, CS & IT-CSCP 2012
[23] Bjoern Dusza, Christoph Ide and Christian Wietfeld, "A Measurement Based Energy
Model for IEEE 802.16e Mobile WiMAX Devices", IEEE 75th VTC 2012 - Spring.
[24] IEEE Std 802.16m-2011, (Amendment to IEEE Std 802.16-2009), IEEE 3 Park
Avenue, NY, USA, 6 May 2011.
[25] IEEE Computer Society and the IEEE Microwave Theory and Techniques Society:
IEEE Std 802.16m-2011 Standard for local and metropolitan area networks, 2011.
[26] http://www.beyond4g.org/mimo-schemes-in-16m-wimax-2-0
[27] Shu-ping Yeh and Shilpa Talwar, "WiMAX Femtocells: A Perspective on Network
Architecture, Capacity, and Coverage", IEEE Communications Magazine, pp.:58-65,
October 2008.
[28] ABI Research, Femtocell Research Service, 2nd qtr., 2007.
[29] http://www.radio-electronics.com/info/wireless/WiFi/ieee-802-11n.php
[30]http://www.qualcomm.com/media/blog/2013/04/22/crossing-over-between-3g4g-andWiFi-seamless-and-robust
[31] Broadcom corporation, 802.11n: Next-Generation Wireless LAN Technology, April
2006.
[32] Thomas Paul and Tokunbo Ogunfunmi , Wireless LAN Comes of Age:
Understanding the IEEE 802.11n Amendment, IEEE Circuits and Systems Magazine
Vol. 8(1), pp. 28-54, 2008.
[33] Ramjee Prasad, Luis Muoz, "WLANs and WPANs towards 4G Wireless", Artech
House, Boston, UK, 2003.
[34] http://meraki.cisco.com/lib/pdf/meraki_whitepaper_802_11n.pdf
[35]http://wwwen.zte.com.cn/endata/magazine/ztetechnologies/2011/no1/articles/201101
/t20110117_201776.html
[36]http://c541678.r78.cf2.rackcdn.com/wp/wp-interworking-WiFi-and-mobilenetworks.pdf
[37] Nokia, Siemens Networks, White Paper,WiFi integration with cellular networks
enhances the customer experience, Finland, 2012
[38] H. Chaouchi and A. Munaretto, Adaptive QoS management for IEEE 802.11 future
wireless ISPs, Wireless Networks, vol. 10, no. 4, pp. 413421, 2004.
[39] A. Ksentini, M. Naimi, A. Nafaa et al., Adaptive service differentiation for QoS
provisioning in IEEE 802.11 wireless ad hoc networks, in Proceedings of the 1st ACM
international workshop on Performance evaluation of wireless ad hoc, sensor, and
ubiquitous networks. ACM, 2004, pp. 3945.
[40] Aqsa Malik, et al. "QoS in IEEE 802.11-based Wireless Networks: A Contemporary
Survey", arXiv:1411.2852v1 [cs.NI] 11 Nov 2014.
60
[41] S. Choi, J. Del Prado, N. Sai Shankar, and S. Mangold, IEEE 802.11e contentionbased channel access (edcf) performance evaluation, in Communications, 2003.
ICC03. IEEE International Conference on, vol. 2. IEEE, 2003, pp. 11511156.
[42] Claudio Cicconetti, et al. "Quality of Service Support in IEEE 802.16 Networks",
IEEE Network, March/April 2006 http://www.pitt.edu/~dtipper/2700/wimax2.pdf
[43] Wimax Security and Quality Of Service An End-To-End Perspective, Edited by
Seok-Yee Tang, et al. , A John Wiley and Sons, Ltd., 2010.
[44] Business Models For Wireless Internet Access, Heikki Hmminen, Editor,
Helsinki University of Technology Department of Electrical and Communications
Engineering Networking Laboratory.
[45] Doug Gray, "Mobile WiMAX: A Performance and Comparative Summary", WiMAX
Forum, September 2006.
[46]https://itunews.itu.int/En/2061-World-Radiocommunication-Conference2012.note.aspx
[47]http://www.itu.int/ITU-R/index.asp?category=conferences&rlink=wrc12&lang=en&general-information=1
[48] http://www.realwireless.biz/2012/02/21/wrc-12-final-update-the-outcome/
[49] ITU, World Radiocommunication Conference 2015 (WRC-15): Agenda and Relevant
Resolutions http://www.itu.int/dms_pub/itu-r/oth/12/01/R12010000014A01PDFE.pdf
[50] Report ITU-R M.2290-0, "Future spectrum requirements estimate for terrestrial
IMT", December 2013.
[51] http://www.forbescustom.com/TelecomPgs/WimaxP1.html
[52] Amitabh Kumar, "Mobile Broadcasting with WiMAX", Focal Press, ISBN-13: 978-0240-81040-9, pp.: 508-527, April 7, 2008.
61