Professional Documents
Culture Documents
INTRODUCTION
The common concept of cutting sugarcane stalks is to apply impact force with a whipping knife by hand or high rotating speed of a circular knife
blade by mechanical power. Harvesting sugarcane by hand is hard work. An
average, experienced laborer can cut about 2 tons/day with stalks from
12 mm to 50 mm in diameter. A modern cane harvester, equipped with
112 kw to 186 kw engine has a harvesting capacity of 15-40 tons/hr. To
improve the efficiency of a sugarcane harvester and minimize the power consumption, it is always necessary to know the cutting resistance of the sugarcane stalk. Cutting resistance is not only related to certain mechanical properties of the material to be cut, but is also affected by the sharpness of the
knife blade. For this reason, a knife blade for the base cutter used in Brazil is
recommended to be replaced every working week. In addition, cutting resistance can be a function of cutting speed. An impact load or shock load
applied to a material usually encounters less resistance. A hand whipping
knife may accelerate to a maximum velocity of 8 m/sec; a base cutter
rotates at a tip speed of from, 20 to 30 in/sec (4000 to 6000 ft/min)
(Clayton, 1974). The mechanical properties involved in cutting are shear
stress, compressive stress and friction between the knife surface and the
stalk. Cochran and others (1970), in Louisiana, have measured the tensile
and compressive stress of cane stalks, but no information on shear stress
and friction is available. In reality, estimating cutting resistance by measuring
classical mechanical properties is difficult. For making a preliminary study,
this paper suggests a direct measuring method that estimates cutting resistance by using an actual cutter and applying an impact force.
AGRICULTURAL ENGINEERING
For modifying the hand cutting method, a special impact cutting device
was designed as shown in Fig. 1. It consists of a steel hammer of one kg
weight with an adjustable arm (25 cm). In order to gain high impact force,
a strong torsional spring made of music wire with a coil diameter of 2.5 cm
was used. Three different sizes of wire were adopted. They were Nos. G7,
G8 and G9, with diameters of 4.36 mm (0.1770"), 3.97 mm (0.1620")
and 3.63 mm (0.1483") respectively. The knife cutter used for this study
is shown in Fig. 2.
kt
(1/8"),
2153
C.S. CHANG
FIGURE 3 . Oscilloscope tracings (sample G7 bottom). Upper: cutting forcetime curve (F-t). Force scale - 9.4 kgf/
div. Time scale - Zms./div. Lower:
cutting force - penetration depth curve
(F-x). Force scalc 10 kgf/div. Depth
scale - 0.76 cm/div.
EQUATIONS TO BE CONSIDERED
The total potential energy (E) released by the hammer, for cutting, is
calculated as follows :
Converting the potential egergy into kinetic energy, and ignoring the
moment of inertia of the rotating arm (5/8" tube) the maximum velocity
(V,,,,) at the moment of impact can be obtained as follows.
AGRICULTURAL ENGINEERING
The average cutting resistance per unit diameter was measured and is defined
as follows:
<"!,:,
100
-
D
0
i
LIST OF SYMBOLS
Eff
K
I
I
I
*X
37
"
"
59
= Time in sec.
V,
I
I
2156
AGRICULTURAL ENGINEERING
The cutting force distribution of Fig. 3 also indicates that the peak
resistance of the canestalk occurs on both sides of the stalk instead ol in
the middle of the cross section. This is due to the high resistance of the
rind.
The hardness indicatetd by the pin penetrometer as shown in Table I
has good correlation with cutting energy (energy absorbed) and cutting
resistance. However the detailed relationship requires further statistical study.
TABLE 1. Results of impact cutting test (for the first internode only).
I
I
I
I
SAMPLES
G7
68
G9
**
upper
,M
= middle, B = bottom
The results showed that the most economical maximum velocity at the
moment of impact should be about 6 m/sec which gives a good cutting
efficiency of above 30%. There is no indication that the cutting resistance
is reduced by increasing the maximum impact velocity above 6 m/sec;
below 5 m/sec the impact energy is not sufficient to cut through the stalk.
The overall results showed that the maximum efficiency of hand cutting is
not more than 37%, which is very low.
C.S. CHANG
The first internode (from the ground) has a unit cutting resistance of
from 3.55 kgf/cm to 6;l kgf/cm and varies with location on the stalk. The
results indicate that the highest cutting resistance is located close to the
growth ring.
REFERENCES
1 . Cochran B.J., and Baker, Gene. (1970). Engineering properties of Sugar Cane
and their Relationship to Mechanical Harvesting. ASAE paper no. 70359.
2 . Chang C.S. Ming Loo et a / . (1973). Oil palm Harvester. Technical Report, University of Singapore (unpublished).
3 . Clayton Joe E. (October 1974). High-speed photography of Sugar Cane Harvesting. Journal Sugar & Aziicar.