Professional Documents
Culture Documents
ii
PROCEEDINGS OF THE
IADIS INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE
ALGARVE, PORTUGAL
APRIL 11-13, 2008
Organised by
IADIS
International Association for Development of the Information Society
iii
Copyright 2008
IADIS Press
All rights reserved
This work is subject to copyright. All rights are reserved, whether the whole or part of the material
is concerned, specifically the rights of translation, reprinting, re-use of illustrations, recitation,
broadcasting, reproduction on microfilms or in any other way, and storage in data banks.
Permission for use must always be obtained from IADIS Press. Please contact secretariat@iadis.org
ISBN: 978-972-8924-54-6
SUPPORTED BY
iv
TABLE OF CONTENTS
FOREWORD
xi
PROGRAM COMMITTEE
xiii
KEYNOTE LECTURES
xvii
CONFERENCE TUTORIALS
xx
FULL PAPERS
CO-DESIGN FOR CONCEPTUAL SPACES: AN AGILE DESIGN METHODOLOGY
FOR M-LEARNING
David E. Millard, Sue J Faulds, Lester Gilbert, Yvonne Howard, Dan Sparks, Gary B. Wills, and
Pei Zhang
11
19
27
Peta Wyeth, Hilary Smith, Kher Hui Ng, Geraldine Fitzpatrick, Rose Luckin, Kevin Walker,
Judith Good, Josh Underwoo, and Steve Benford
35
43
Agnieszka Bachfischer, Elaine Lawrence , Andrew Litchfield, Laurel Evelyn Dyson and
Richard Raban
51
61
Paul J Fortier
69
77
84
91
98
SHORT PAPERS
TEACHING AND E-ASSESSMENT IN MOBILE CONTEXTS
109
Maria Joo Loureiro, Lcia Pombo, Ana Balula and Antnio Moreira
114
119
125
130
135
140
Alexandre Antonino Gonalves Martinazzo, Andr Nascimento Mossinato, Rafael Barbolo Lopes,
Joyce Alessandra Saul, Nathalia Sautchuk Patrcio, Irene Karaguilla Ficheman and
Roseli de Deus Lopes
vi
145
150
Michele Amoretti, Maria Chiara Laghi, Monica Mordonini and Francesco Zanichelli
155
160
164
169
174
Lisa Gjedde
177
182
186
Malcolm Andrew
191
Irene Karaguilla Ficheman, Joyce Alessandra Saul, Gilda Aparecida de Assis, Ana Grasiele
Dionisio Correa, Jorge F. Franco, Romero Tori and Roseli de Deus Lopes
196
201
Gustavo Ramrez Gonzlez, Mario Muoz Organero and Carlos Delgado Kloos
206
211
Michael Ghebru
vii
216
221
Jorge Ferreira Franco, Irene Karaguilla Ficheman, Roseli de Deus Lopes, Arlete Lopes da Silva
Ferreira, Maria Eunildes Sales Barbosa Santos, Glaucilaine Ferreira, Vaneide Rodrigues do
Santos Arajo and Marlene Moreno
227
Raymond M. Kekwaletswe
235
John Traxler
240
249
253
257
POSTERS
265
viii
268
Eugenia I. Toki
Department of Speech and Language Therapy, Technological Educational Institute (TEI) of Epirus,
4th Km National Road Ioanninon- Athinon, Ioannina, 45500 Greece
and
Laboratory of New Technologies and Distance Learning, Department of Education, University of Ioannina
Panepistimioupoli, Ioannina, 45110 Greece
Jenny Pange
Laboratory of New Technologies and Distance Learning, Department of Education, University of Ioannina
Panepistimioupoli, Ioannina, 45110 Greece
ABSTRACT
The aim of this study is to investigate students needs and attitudes on ICTs and mobile learning, in order to design an
effective solution for university e-learning services. This is a pilot study that aims to investigate the introduction of
mobile learning (m-learning) to Higher Education students in Greece. The results of this pilot study have shown that
students are ready to use new technological opportunities in Higher Education because they offer a different and more
flexible scenario of learning.
KEYWORDS
e-learning, m-learning, Higher Education.
1. INTRODUCTION
In todays life, there is a continuous need to consider alternative ways of learning, in order to educate the
economically active population. Our society is characterized by a rapid and continuous technological
evolution. The technological achievements have had an important effect on the way people work and, to a
great extent, on the way they learn. According to Grohmann et al. (2005) human knowledge and capabilities
must constantly be renewed and enhanced. Technology, more than ever, is recognized today as a valuable
tool in the process of learning, and new educational practices are applied in all educational levels as well as
in lifelong learning.
The growing use of mobile devices and wireless communication technologies provide a new and flexible
educational model at all types of Education (formal, informal, non-formal), mobile learning, which is
frequently referred to as m-learning. Brown (2005) suggested that m-learning is a form of e-learning that
specifically employs wireless communications and mobile devices to deliver content and learning support.
Additionally, Georgiev et al. (2006) suggested that m-learning enables access to contents at any place at any
time. According to Keegan (2002) m-learning has emerged as an educational application from the
technological advances in mobile computing and mobile devices (phones, Tablet PCs, iPods, smart phones,
PDAs, etc.), intelligent user interfaces, context modeling, wireless communications and networking
technologies, like WI-FI, BlueTooth, GPS, GSM, and GPRS (Sharples 2000; Knowledge Anywhere 2002).
Recent research, (Sharples 2005) specifies mobile device as PDAs, digital handheld devices and cell phones,
240
or even better as any device that is small, autonomous and self-effacing enough to accompany everyone in
everyday life.
Additionally, mobile devices can also be used in learning settings of any type. These portable tools can be
seen as instruments for accessing educational content, either stored locally on the device or accessed through
the mobile network. Trifonova & Ronchetti (2003) suggested that handheld devices can enhance the
educational process, due to their ability to support communication through voice, written messages, still or
moving images and videos.
The unexpected proliferation of the handheld devices and the need of mobility in education make mlearning a very challenging research area in the e-learning field. The main advantage of these devices, for
teachers and learners, is the freedom to use what is needed wherever it is needed (Trifonova & Ronchetti
2006). Uther et al. (2005) have shown that users of m-learning applications, in comparison to e-learning
application users, can choose to be engaged in learning activities across a greater time span and in a variety
of different environments. Thus, learners are able to decide on the context, the place, the time and the pace of
their learning experience.
The mobile devices available today, such as portable computers, telephones, PDAs, etc., are equipped
with all the necessary software and hardware for an appropriate m-learning application. These new devices
have more memory capacity, as they make use of supplementary memory cards, and their screen size is
larger with better resolution, compared to elderly devices. In addition, mobile providers in most countries
worldwide offer nowadays high Internet speed connection packages in affordable cost.
In Greece, recently, all major mobile network providers (www.vodafone.gr, www.wind.com.gr,
www.cosmote.gr) have announced commercial packages offering broadband Internet connections for mobile
devices in economical prices, making the necessary technology available and affordable. Precisely, the
nowadays mobile devices, present in the Greek market, are enhanced with technologies like GPRS (2.5G)
and UMTS (3G) presenting the user with the opportunity to exploit all the advantages of an actual Internet
connection. Additionally, the new technology announced by the network providers, High Speed Packet
Access (HSDPA), offer a download speed of 3,6 Mbps, which, in the near future, will be shifted to 7,2 Mbps.
On the other hand, many Universities and Higher Educational Institutes in Greece provide e-learning
courses and educational material through their web pages in both terms of traditional and distance courses for
teachers
and
learners
(www.gunet.gr,
http://www.auth.gr/admin/services/teledu/index_el.html,
http://www.aueb.gr/yphresies/kethl.htm). For instance, the University of Ioannina offers an e-learning
service, through which students and teaching staff can have access to the electronic material and can
communicate amongst them (www.ecourse.uoi.gr).
The aim of this pilot study is to investigate the current situation in Greece concerning m-learning. In the
recent Greek bibliography we did not find any other studies (pilot or full) concerning m-learning.
Analytically, we examine whether students are willing to be engaged with the new opportunities that
technology provides, so as to be able to use a different and more flexible learning pattern, m-learning.
241
technology. Finally, the last section focused on the students capabilities to use mobile devices and in
particular cell phones, as well as their knowledge and point of view regarding m-learning.
3. RESULTS DISCUSSION
The data collected was processed and statistically analyzed through SPSS v.13.0. In our sample we found
that one in every ten students was working during his/her studies for living. The 8% of the participants lives
with their family in Ioannina while the rest 92% of the sample consists of non-permanent citizens of
Ioannina. More than 75 % of the participants have a computer at parents home, nearly 56 % have a computer
at the place where they study, while 43.9 % of the sample does not have a computer in Ioannina, but they
have access to University computer laboratories. The following table (Table 1) resumes the students
percentage of having computer and Internet access at their parents home, as well as at their home in
Ioannina, respectively.
Table 1. Samples results on owning a computer and having Internet access
Means of ICT / Place
Own a Computer
Have Internet Access
Parents Home
75.8 %
40.9 %
Concerning the ICT skills, 85 % of the participants stated that they feel confident in using Microsoft
Office programs and more than half of the participants reported that they make use of different forms of
communication, like email, chat, blogs, etc., as shown in Figure 1.
120
P
ercentage
100
80
Elementary Knowledge
60
Advanced Knowledge
40
20
0
Internet Search W eb Browsers
The 90 % of the sample have had experience with e-learning activities, among which only five (5%) is
familiar with m-learning term.
Concerning the use of mobile devices, all participants state that they own a cellular phone and they send
and receive SMS, among which the 57.6 % send and receive MMS regularly. The majority of these cell
phones present advanced characteristics like taking and displaying photos and videos (98.5% and 95.5%
respectively). Almost all cell devices have some kind of wireless connection. Figure 2 summarises the mobile
technologies that enable wireless connection with the mobile network or between two or more devices like
WiFi, Bluetooth, GPRS or Infrared, used on current mobile devices.
90
78,8
80
P
e
rc
e
n
ta
g
e
70
60
W iFi
Bluetooth
50
GPRS
40
Infrared
28,8
30
Nothing
20
10
7,6
1,5
4,5
Finally, the majority of the sample, 86.4 %, shows interest in receiving SMS containing information and
announcements on course material. More than 84 % of the participants is keen on using m-learning practices,
and confirms a wider intent to access the University site and receive educational material relevant to the
242
Percentage
studies. The 78.8 % of the participants is willing to pay an additional cost in order to have Internet access
through cell phones (Figure 3).
100
90
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
Yes
No
Interested in
receiving informative
SMS?
Interested in
accessing course
material from
mobile?
Interesting in
involving in mlearning activities?
W illing to pay
eventual additional
cost?
To summarize, the results of the study indicate that the students in the Educational Department possess all
the basic knowledge and ICT skills in order to engage themselves to m-learning activities. In addition, the
majority of the students use advanced mobile devices that could support the extended platform, proposed in
the final section. Therefore, the results strongly indicate that the participants have all the necessary
competences and instruments to participate in m-learning programs. In precise, they appear eager to use their
mobile devices in order to receive information, educational material, and any further services relevant to their
courses.
Concluding, further research could focus on a bigger sample including students from other departments,
as well as other Universities. In addition, further investigation should take into account that m-learning is a
promising but new teaching style that needs to be tested and evaluated thoroughly.
Mobile applications should rely on network connectivity as little as possible (Gong & Tarasewich
2004), as the mobile network is often subject to disconnections. In other words, m-learning content should be
consistent and readily available whether the device is connected to the mobile network or not. For such
reason the platform proposed should support the pure mobility of m-learning, thus no constant connection
to the mobile network should be required. Any additional needed data should be downloaded to the device
and then it can be used offline.
For privacy reasons, the platform should include user identification and authentication.
Authorized students should be able to receive via SMS, information and announcements regarding
the subscribed courses. They should also be able to communicate with other authorized users, perform tests,
etc.
The material should be delivered to a variety of handheld devices with different capabilities, screen
sizes, input and output facilities. Thus, the portability is a crucial aspect in the implementation of such a
platform, as the material should be displayed properly in a variety of mobile devices. Ideally, the system
should detect the different mobile devices capabilities and limitations and select the services that could be
provided in each case. Furthermore, the platform should be extensible in order to support different devices
and different types of educational material.
Finally, the existing educational material should be appropriately formulated in order to concur with
some basic guidelines proposed by researchers like Grasso and Roselli (2005) and Gong and Tarasewich
(2004). These guidelines concern the structure of information displayed, and more precisely matters such as
aspect (fonts, colours, etc.), type (word documents, spreadsheets, etc.) and elements included (photos, text,
multimedia, etc.).
243
REFERENCES
Brown, H.T., 2005. Towards a model for MLearning, International Journal on E-Learning, (4)3, p. 299-315.
Georgiev, T., et al., 2006. Transitioning from e-Learning to m-Learning: Present Issues and Future Challenges, Seventh
ACIS International Conference on Software Engineering, Artificial Intelligence, Networking, and
Parallel/Distributed Computing (SNPD'06), pp. 349-353.
Gong, J. & Tarasewich, P., N.K. Guidelines for Handheld Mobile Device Interface Design, [Internet]. Available at:
http://www.ccs.neu.edu/home/tarase/GuidelinesGongTarase.pdf [Accessed 23 October 2007].
Grasso, A. & Roselli, T., 2005. Guidelines for designing and developing contents for mobile learning, IEEE International
Workshop on Wireless and Mobile Technologies in Education, WMTE, p.123-127.
Grohmann, G. et al., 2005. ARIS MOBILE: Helping to define the future of mobile learning, International Conference on
Mobile Business, ICMB, p.213-219.
Keegan, D., 2002. The Future of Learning: From eLearning to mLearning, [Internet]. Available at:
http://learning.ericsson.net/leonardo/book.html [Accessed 23 October 2007].
Knowledge Anywhere, 2002. Flexible Learning: Mobile Learning Objects, [Internet], A White Paper. Available at:
www.ottersurf.com/MLO-WP.pdf [Accessed 23 October 2007].
Sharples, M., et al., 2005. Towards a theory of mobile learning, [Internet] Proceedings of mLearn 2005. Available at:
http://www.mlearn.org.za/CD/papers/Sharples%20Theory%20of%20Mobile.pdf [Accessed 23 October 2007].
Sharples, M., 2000. The design of personal mobile technologies for lifelong learning, Computers and Education, (34),
p.177-93.
Trifonova, A., & Ronchetti, M., 2006. A General Architecture to Support Mobility in Learning, Proceedings of the IEEE
International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies, p.26-30.
Trifonova, A., & Ronchetti, M., 2003. Advances In Technology-Based Education: Towards A Knowledge Based Society,
[Internet]. Available at: www.formatex.org/micte2003/micte2003.htm [Accessed 23 October 2007].
Uther, M., et al., 2005. Mobile Adaptive CALL (MAC): A case-study in developing a mobile learning application for
speech/audio language training, Proceedings of the 2005 IEEE International Workshop on Wireless and Mobile
Technologies in Education.
244