Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Engineering Structures
journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/engstruct
A practical design method for reinforced concrete structures with viscous dampers
Ying Zhou , Xilin Lu, Dagen Weng, Ruifu Zhang
State Key Laboratory of Disaster Reduction in Civil Engineering, Tongji University, 1239 Siping Road, Shanghai 200092, China
a r t i c l e
i n f o
Article history:
Received 19 July 2011
Revised 7 February 2012
Accepted 9 February 2012
Available online 22 March 2012
Keywords:
Viscous damper
Design method
Reinforced concrete structure
Wenchuan Earthquake
a b s t r a c t
As a result of the 2008 Wenchuan Earthquake, the Chinese government issued a modied seismic code
with increased protection categories and seismic intensities. According to the new code, a lot of school
and industrial buildings need to be seismically retrotted to satisfy the new seismic requirements. Compared to the retrotting technology of seismic isolation, the installation of viscous dampers to those
existing buildings is more realistic because of easy construction. However, the design of viscous dampers,
which provides a high level of damping in a structure, is a relatively new application in China for a wellestablished and proven technology in other seismically active regions in the world. Only general information on the usage of viscous damper is given in Chinese code, which would potentially confuse engineers
and researchers. Thus, the intent of this paper is to propose a practical design method for reinforced concrete (RC) structures with viscous dampers. The proposed design process is divided into two stages. In the
preliminary stage, the quantity, mechanical parameters and congurations of the viscous dampers are
determined. In the next stage, the reduction of deformations, additional damping ratio, and connection
of the dampers to the structure are examined. An example is also given to demonstrate the application
of the proposed method to retrot a RC frame structure by viscous dampers. It is concluded that the proposed design method satises the urgent requirement of design and pushes the further development of
research on viscous dampers.
2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
1. Introduction
1.1. Background
On May 12th, 2008, a magnitude of MW 8.0 earthquake hit
Wenchuan in China. The earthquake had a shallow focal depth of
approximately 19 km, with the epicenter located 80km WNW of
Chengdu, capital of Sichuan province. The entire country was devastated by the mega earthquake. The death toll of the earthquake
was of over 69,000 killed people, with over 374,000 people injured
and nearly 5 million homeless; the total lost was estimated at
US$130 billion.
After the Wenchuan Earthquake, new Chinese seismic design
codes were issued with the modications in attempt to increase
protection categories and seismic intensities. In Chinese code, the
protection categories of buildings specied in the Standard for Classication of Seismic Protection of Building Constructions (GB50223,
2008) [1] are classied into four categories: moderate protection
(MP), standard protection (SP), emphasized protection (EP), and
particular protection (PP), in the order of the increasing protection
requirement. The design requirements for the four building types
of protection categories are different in structural details and seismic forces [2]. After the quake, protection categories for all class
buildings, dormitories, and dining halls in kindergartens, primary
schools, and middle schools are increased from standard seismic
protection buildings to emphasized seismic protection buildings.
This modication means that the seismic forces of those school
buildings will be calculated commensurate with the design intensity while the structural details will be checked one degree higher
than the design intensity. The purpose of this modication is to
protect young and valuable students in earthquakes. On the other
hand, the seismic intensities of cities are specied in the Code for
Seismic Design of Buildings (GB50011-2008) [3]. After Wenchuan
Earthquake, the seismic intensities of many cities in China are
increased by half degree or more. Lots of school buildings and
industrial buildings in those cities are not complied with new seismic code requirements and thus need to be retrotted.
Comparing to traditional retrotting practices, such as enlarging cross sections or adding steel plates to structural elements
[4], the application of supplementary viscous dampers to buildings
enables easier construction, and reduced labor and downtime.
1.2. Existing research on viscous dampers
Corresponding author. Tel.: +86 21 6598 6157; fax: +86 21 6598 2668.
E-mail addresses: yingzhou@tongji.edu.cn (Y. Zhou), lxlst@tongji.edu.cn (X. Lu),
wdg@tongji.edu.cn (D. Weng), zhangruifu@gmail.com (R. Zhang).
0141-0296/$ - see front matter 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
doi:10.1016/j.engstruct.2012.02.014
188
Wc
4p W s
Ws
1
FD
2
Fd
W c 4F d D
Kd
800
600
400
200
-60
-40
-20
20
40
60
-200
-400
-600
-800
189
Fd
F di
F di C jv ja signv
Fig. 2. Simplied parallelogram of the forcedisplacement curve of a nonlinear
viscous damper.
4F d D KF d
d
4p 12 FD
with
2F d 1 KF d =D
d
pF
Fd
=D,
Kd
21 l F d
p
F
In Eq. (5), l is the ratio of the damper displacement to the relative story displacement (Fig. 2), which can also be seen as ductility demand. In addition, it can be observed that the additional
damping ratio f induced by the viscous dampers can be correlated
to the displacement ratio l and the force ratio Fd/F.
According to Eq. (5), the damping force is,
Fd
p
21 l
fF
d A sin xt
10
v d_ Ax cos xt
11
Thus,
12
Table 1
Inter-story drift objectives of RC structures.
Minor earthquake level
Frame structures
Shear wall structures
Hybrid structures
Operational
Immediate occupancy
Life safety
Collapse prevention
1/550
1/1000
1/800
1/250
1/500
1/400
1/100
1/250
1/200
1/50
1/120
1/100
21 l
0.20
0.24
0.25
Average
2.0
2.1
2.1
2.0
190
(kN)
(kN)
5000
4000
3000
=0.00
2000
=0.10
1000
(mm)
0
-80
-60
-40
-20
0
-1000
20
40
60
80
=0.20
(mm)
=0.30
=0.50
=0.75
-2000
=1.00
-3000
-4000
-5000
(kN)
5000
4000
3000
2000
1000
(mm)
0
-80
-60
-40
-20
-1000
20
40
60
80
=0.20
=1.00
-2000
-3000
-4000
-5000
Fig. 4. Forcedisplacement curves at a = 0.2 and a = 1.0.
F di
jv ja signv
13
A viscous damper catalogue is usually provided by the manufacturers for several given a values. Generally, the a value selected for
seismic design is smaller than that of wind resistant design. Using a
Taylor device as an example, for structures with seismic demand
dominating over wind demand, the a exponent value typically
ranges from 0.3 to 1.0. On the other hand, for structures with wind
controlled design, the a exponent value is usually between 0.7 and
1.0 [22].
A velocity of a damper can be preliminarily premised and
checked in the second design stage. It is suggested a velocity of
200250 mm/s will be suitable for viscous dampers on buildings.
For example, researchers took 10 in/s (254 mm/s) as a design
velocity of viscous dampers [23].
Given the force capacity Fdi for each damper, all parameters in
Eq. (13) are now determined.
2.1.3. Conguration of viscous dampers
The main concept to keep in mind when determining the conguration of the viscous dampers in a building is to place them
in those stories where inter-story drifts are relatively large. However, putting dampers only in the stories with excessively large
displacement actually has a counter effect of increasing inter-story
drift in the upper stories [24]. As a result, dampers should also be
placed in the adjacent stories to ensure a uniform deformation
shape for the building.
191
50400
7200
7200
7200
7200
7200
7200
7200
7200
7200
17400
3000
192
Table 2
First six periods of the structure.
No.
Period (s)
Modal shape
1
2
3
4
5
6
1.32
1.25
1.22
0.43
0.42
0.41
Translation
Torsion
Translation
Translation
Torsion
Translation
in Y
in X
in Y
in X
Fd
4c F d max Dd max
4F d D
Kd
14
16
where Kb is the stiffness of the supporting component in the direction of the energy dissipating device; Cv is the linear damping factor
of the energy-dissipating device, which corresponds to the
fundamental vibration period of the structure and is determined
by testing; and T1 is the fundamental vibration period of the
energy-dissipated structure.
As introduced before, Cv in fact is a factor correlated to the stiffness of dampers. The physical signicance of Eq. (16) is to build an
equation between the stiffness of components and the stiffness of
dampers. Since Cv is hard to be accurately determined based on the
fundamental vibration period of the structure, according to Eq. (9),
F d0 C v jv ja signv K c Dmax
17
C v jx Dmax ja K c Dmax
Cv x K c
18
15
19
K b 3 x Cv 3 K c
PP
f
K b 6p=T 1 C v
when a = 1,
20
193
Fig. 11. Time histories and response spectra of three input waves.
194
Table 3
Shear forces and preliminary damping forces of time history analysis.
Story
7
6
5
4
3
2
1
142
1430
2237
2694
3022
3464
3722
Number of dampers
Y direction
X direction
Y direction
X direction
Y direction
129
1556
2062
2282
2261
2701
3238
43
429
671
808
907
1039
1117
39
467
619
685
678
810
971
0
0
2x500kN
2x500kN
2x500kN
2x700kN
2x700kN
0
0
2x500kN
2x500kN
2x500kN
2x700kN
2x700kN
Viscous
damper
Viscous
damper
Joint
strengthening
195
VD
VD
VD
VD
VD
VD
VD
VD
A
1
K 0b 284; 000kN=mm
K c 22; 511kN=mm
21
Thus,
1
K 0b
1
93; 774 > 3 K c 67; 533
K1
22
196
Fig. 15. Maximum inter-story drifts of the structure with viscous dampers.
197
Floor
X direction
X direction
Y direction
Y direction
X direction
Y direction
7
6
5
4
3
2
1
142
1430
2237
2694
3022
3464
3722
129
1556
2062
2282
2261
2701
3238
165
1444
1738
2091
2282
2070
2091
153
1369
1566
1833
1950
1884
1895
16
1
22
22
24
40
44
18
12
24
20
14
30
41
7
6
5
4
3
2
1
407
4087
6390
7697
8635
9898
10,630
371
4455
5902
6519
6461
7716
9252
350
3379
4332
5090
6195
6575
6626
330
3206
3774
4672
5489
5556
5376
14
17
32
34
28
34
38
11
28
36
28
15
28
42
7
6
5
4
3
2
1
813
8173
12,780
15,390
17,270
19,800
21,270
741
8910
11,800
13,040
12,920
15,430
18,500
627
6426
8832
11,230
13,360
14,130
14,220
597
6035
7326
9812
11,380
11,630
12,340
23
21
31
27
23
29
33
19
32
38
25
12
25
33
Fig. 16. Roof acceleration with and without viscous dampers under major earthquake of El Centro.
Table 5
Checking for the average damping ratio.
Earthquake scenario
X direction (%)
Y direction (%)
19.4
12.0
7.4
19.8
13.4
7.6
(kN)
are performed in the second stage of design. An example is also given to demonstrate the application of the proposed method to retrot a RC frame structure by viscous dampers. It is concluded that
the damping forces could be estimated as 30% of the story forces in
the preliminary design. With viscous dampers designed by the
(kN)
(kN)
800
600
500
400
600
400
300
400
200
200
100
(mm)
0
-6
-4
-2
-100 0
6 -15
200
(mm)
0
-10
-5
10
15 -30
-10
10
20
30
-200
-200
-200
(mm)
0
-20
-400
-300
-400
-500
X1
-400
X2
Y2
Y1
-600
-600
-800
X3
Y3
198
Table 6
Internal forces of one column connected to the viscous dampers.
Internal force
X direction
Y direction
X direction
Y direction
X direction
Y direction
4556
138
561
5059
96
347
4713
157
618
5326
112
404
1.03
1.14
1.10
1.05
1.16
1.16
Acknowledgements
The authors are grateful for the nancial support in part from
the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos.
90815029, 5102114006 and 51078274), and National Basic
Research of China (Grant No. 2007CB714202). China Strong Motion
Network Center is much appreciated for their support on ground
motion earthquake records in Wenchuan Earthquake.
References
[1] China Ministry of Construction (CMC). Standard for classication of seismic
protection of building constructions (GB50223-2008). Beijing, China: China
Architecture & Building Press; 2008 [in Chinese].
[2] Lu XL, Zhou Y. Modication of seismic design code after the Sichuan
Earthquake of May 12, 2008. In: Proceedings of international association for
bridge and structural engineering, Cavtat, Croatia; 35 May 2010.
[3] China Ministry of Construction (CMC). Code for seismic design of buildings
(GB50011-2001), modied version. Beijing, China: China Architecture &
Building Press; 2008 [in Chinese].
[4] Lu XL. Retrotting design of building structures. Boca Raton, USA: CRC Press;
2010.
[5] Constantinou MC, Symans MD. Experimental study of seismic response of
buildings with supplemental uid dampers. Struct Des Tall Spec
1993;2(2):93132.
[6] Gluck N, Reinhorn AM, Gluck J, Levy R. Design of supplemental dampers for
control of structures. J Struct Eng 1996;122(12):13949.