Professional Documents
Culture Documents
More NextBlog
CreateBlog SignIn
P H I L I P P I N E L AW C A S E D I G E S T S E T C .
T H I S S I T E I S F O R S T U D E N T S W H O N E E D H E L P W I T H T H E I R C A S E L O A D S F O R L AW S C H O O L .
T H ES E CA S ES W ER E H A NDED TO U S , A ND T H EN DI G ES T ED A ND I W O U LD LI K E TO S H A R E I T W I T H
Y O U G U Y S . I F Y O U N E E D T O S H A R E I T W I T H O T H E R S L I K E P R I N T I N G I T O U T. P L E A S E C I T E T H E
W E B PA G E A S T O G I V E C R E D I T T O W H O M T H E C R E D I T I S D U E T H A N K S . L E AV E Y O U R C O M M E N T S
B ELO W !
F OL L OW BY E M AI L
Emailaddress...
Submit
TO L O O K F O R C A S E S FA S T E R :
Search
Olivia Navoa and Ernesto Navoa vs. C.A., Teresita Domdoma and
Eduardo Domdoma
GR No 59255 20December1995
COUNTER
Facts:
On December 1977 Teresita Domdoma and Eduardo Domdoma filed a
case with the RTC for collection of various sums of money based on
loans given by them to Olivia Navoa. They cased was dismissed on the
ground that there was no cause of action and that the Domdomas do
C A S E S B Y TO P I C
not have no capacity to sue. They appealed to the C.A. and was
loan. The first instance is when Teresita gave Olivia a diamond ring
Conspiracy (1)
condition that if the ring was not returned within 15 days from
which were secured by PCIB checks, which were all dated to 1 month
after the loan. All these checks were not honoured under the same
Damages (3)
Delay (1)
Issue:
Discernment (1)
Was the decision of the RTC to dismiss the case due to having no
Navoa failed to pay the price for the ring when the payment was due
Homicide (3)
Insanity (1)
Insurance (2)
As for the other loans extended by Teresita to Olivia, they were all
interest (3)
secured by PCIB checks. It can be inferred that since the checks were
all dated to 1 month after the loan, it follows that the loans are then
payable 1 month after they were contracted, and also these checks
Legislature (2)
Olivia and Ernesto Navoa failed to make good the checks that were
minority (1)
issued as payment for their obligations. Art 1169 of the Civil Code is
Mitigating (3)
ObliCon (13)
Parricide (1)
Political Law (2)
Potestative Condition (2)
Power of Inquiry (1)
Held:
The petition is DENIED and the decision of the C.A. remanding the
Rape (1)
rebellion (2)
Reciprocal Obligations (1)
Robbery (1)
Security (1)
such right; and, (c) an act or omission on the part of the defendant
Treachery (1)
unconscionable (1)
F OR RE SE ARCH N E E D S
P O S T ED B Y J EFFDAV I D1986 AT 9: 43 P M
AUSL Jurisprudence
title (1)
funny (0)
interesting (0)
cool (0)
N O COM M EN TS :
H I ! W E L C O M E TO M Y B L O G .
P OS T A COM M EN T
If you have any comments on the above cases or topics, by all means!
Enteryourcomment...
Commentas:
Publish
Unknown(Google)
Signout
Notifyme
Preview
Jointhissite
withGoogleFriendConnect
Members(5)
Newer Post
Home
Older Post
Alreadyamember?Signin
CASE D I G E STS
2011 (4)
2010 (2)
2009 (37)
December (6)
November (7)
Civil Law 2 ObliCon Ernesto
Ang and Rosalinda An...
Civil Law 2 Olivia Navoa and
Ernesto Navoa vs. Co...
Civil Law 2 ObliCon MMTC
and Apolinario Ajoc vs....
Civil Law 2 ObliCon F.F.
Manacop Construction Co...
Civil Law 2 ObliCon TRB
Employees Union Indepen...
Civil Law 2 ObliCon Pichel vs.
Alonzo
Civil Law 2 ObliCon FGU
Insurance vs. GPS Trucki...
October (1)
September (7)
August (16)
T O TA L P A G E V I E W S
102673
S U B S C R I B E TO T H I S B L O G . . . .
PO ST S
C O MME NT S
Search