Abdul-Aziz albekairi also known as Aziz was charged with
sexual assault. He has worked in many establishments since 2006. According to police, A 26 year woman visited the massage center where she was assaulted by the owner Aziz. Police believe that there might be more victims as this person has worked at many sites. He was charged on 10th July and scheduled to appear in court on 10th august. (Westall, 2015) Here in this case the person who affected directly is the victim, a 26 year woman. Police department might get affected as this sexual assault cases are happening most often now days. Also the family members of Aziz are affected directly. The society is indirectly affected as this kind of case put a question on the woman security and the law system. This profession of massage is also affected indirectly somewhere due to this kind of cases. It is the clear case of criminal injustice where Aziz tried to violate fundamental rights of the woman. This case can be reviewed by two perspectives. When we think this case from the perspective of Aziz, is it okay to harass a customer who is female just due to advance your desire of sex? According to utilitarian perspective, the greater happiness would have been only come if the victim is not assaulted by Aziz. If she was treated normally, not assaulted by the men then the woman would be happy, 1 | Page
the family member who directly affected by this case
would be happy. So according to utilitarian, sexual assault should be avoided as it does not advance utility or happiness. Now if we see another perspective in this case from the victim side. The victims right had been violated without her consent, against her desire. According to libertarianism, the woman has right to make decision on what she wants and what she doesnt. it she is assaulted without her consent then it would be the typical case of criminal injustice. Now from the perspective of police, the man should be charged according to libertarianism concept as he assaulted the woman which violates the liberty rights of the victim. And according to utilitarianism, the man should be warned and set free as it will give the greater happiness than if he charged. The family of the man would be happy. But if further investigations in this case reveals that there are more victims of sexual assault by Aziz then he should be charged. According to my point of view, harassing someone would violate the liberty rights of an individual who is being harassed. it is completely against moral duties of a responsible human being. I think utilitarianism best explains this kind of case. For example, consider a scenario of a woman doing job where she got promotion because the boss wants to satisfy his sexual desire with her without her consent. Here according to utilitarianism, he should not treat the office staff according to their 2 | Page
gender. He should give promotion on performance basis
which will satisfy the staff not only the woman and the greater happiness will come. In any society, any culture the inequality occurs between male and female. Females are often considered inferior to male. This should need some changes. I think Aziz should be warned and set free or given social lesion to treat woman which will give greater happiness to society. But if investigation reveals more victims assaulted by him then he should be punished according to laws.