Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Levi C. Jones
INTRODUCTION
The storyline of 1 Kings begins with the king by which all others would be measured,
King David. It is the end of his life and the kingdom is passed down to Solomon. Under
Solomon, Israel grows in wealth and stature. However, this story is far from “happily ever
after.” Solomon was considered very wise, but ruled, according to the text, very foolishly. He
lived lavishly, had many foreign wives, and enforced an enslaving labor program for building the
kingdom.
To say the least, this was everything that had been warned about in the book of
Deuteronomy. Solomon became the epitome of the very thing God desired least from the
community of Israel. Due to this politic, the kingdom of Israel becomes a split kingdom, Israel
in the north and Judah to the south. The narrative found in 1 and 2 Kings details the rule of the
As such, many people view these texts as historical accounts of the monarchs. However,
many times seemingly important details of a ruler’s reign are left out. Economic welfare of the
two nations does not seem to be the mark of a good leader. Savvy foreign policy does not appear
to be the framework for a good evaluation at all. What might possibly be the lens through which
First, I believe it is important to note that this is not simply a historical account of
leadership. Rather, it is a theological interpretation that sits in judgment upon the respective
leaders that Israel and Judah find themselves under. As I hinted earlier, Deuteronomy plays a
key role in evaluating leadership. After all, Moses remained the paradigm for godly leadership
for centuries after his tenure. So, it is only natural to see that Moses would influence how the
people should view their leadership. 1 Kings does indeed recount historical facts, but its
underlying mission is to provide a theological narrative that begins to explain the results of exile.
Within this paper, I will first provide some historical background that will help us
understand the motivation behind writing this wonderful text. In this, I hope to sufficiently bring
to light Deuteronomy’s connection to 1 and 2 Kings, although we will primarily dwell in 1 Kings
18. Secondly, I will give a succinct synopsis of Ahab’s reign that prepares the reader for the
Elijah confrontation found in 1 Kings 18. Finally, I will provide a theological interpretation of 1
HISTORICAL CONTEXT
“These two books together make up the final part of the Deuteronomistic history.
Deuteronomistic historians utilized various sources such as ‘the book of the annals of Solomon’
(1 Kings 11:41), ‘the book of the annals of the kings of Israel’ (14:19), and ‘the book of the
annals of the kings of Judah’ (v. 29) to compose their work. It is also likely that they drew from
other written or oral sources that had circulated long before these books received their final
Drawing from a wide range of sources, the Deuteronomistic historians redacted the
records of kings’ reigns. Their purpose was not to simply retell the story of God’s people,
although this was likely significant. It is likely that the motivation for this text finds root in the
Babylonian exile. Inevitably, the chosen people began to ask themselves why they were now
finding themselves in a foreign land living in exile. What could have possibly caused this turn of
events and where was God when all of this happened? Was it a failure on God’s part?
In its totality, 1 and 2 Kings communicates the story of God’s people from 960 B. C. to
3
roughly 587 B. C. This means that the text would not have been constructed until some point
during the exile or post-exilic period. The result is a text that reflects the concerns of a people
finding themselves as foreigners in a strange land, rather than inhabitants of the Promise Land.
Unless God has bailed on His promises, which does not seem to be a likelihood, what predicated
How long had they recited the words of the Shema? It is a warning to the people before
entering the land: “Do not follow other gods, any of the gods of the peoples who are all around
you, because the Lord your God, who is present with you, is a jealous God. The anger of the
Lord your God would be kindled against you and he would destroy you from the face of the
earth” (Deut. 6:14-15 NRSV). The failure, it would seem, was placed squarely upon the
As a result, many of the rulers, with only a few exceptions, covered in 1 and 2 Kings are
given a negative evaluation. Generally speaking, the kings are condemned for doing “evil in the
sight of the Lord.” David, Hezekiah, and Josiah are only a small minority of exceptional
leadership found in these pages, all of which ruled over Judah (David was before the divided
kingdom). The authors of 1 and 2 Kings find it little wonder that Israel is destroyed by Assyria
1 KINGS 18 CONTEXT
“Up until the time of Omri, the Northern Kingdom had been unable to establish a
permanent succession of kings. However, with Omri, relative political stability and economic
prosperity was achieved for over three decades. Although the Deuteronomistic writers give little
information concerning Omri’s reign (16:24-28) and describe Omri as having sinned ‘more than
all those before him.’ Omri had great successes both domestically and internationally”
(Varughese 185).
It is in this time of affluence that Ahab is born, son of Omri. As part of a political
partnership with the king of Phoenicia, Omri had Ahab marry Jezebel, daughter to the pagan
Do not intermarry with them, giving your daughters to their sons or taking their
daughters for your sons, for that would turn away your children from following
me, to serve other gods. Then the anger of the Lord would destroy you quickly.
But this is how you must deal with them: break down their altars, smash their
pillars, hew down their sacred poles, and burn their idols with fire. For you are a
people holy to the Lord your God; the Lord your God has chosen you out of all
the peoples on earth to be his people, his treasured possession (NRSV).
Marrying into these other cultures would drive God’s people away from Him. Instead, they
would turn to worthless idols, violating the first command and the Shema’s claim to one God,
King Omri also establishes Samaria as the new capital over Israel. This is in clear
violation of the centralization of worship desired and constructed in Deuteronomy 12. High
places were to be destroyed, the multiplicity of gods and places of worship were to be done away
with. However, now Omri has established another site of worship in Samaria, one that gives
credence to idolatry and doing as each person sees fit. The Law informed Israel that there is only
One God, but Omri seems to have blatantly ignored this fact.
Despite Omri’s political and economic success, he is crowned as the worst king up to that
point. But, if the reader believed that we are going to see a turning point, they are sadly
mistaken. Ahab comes into power, exercising similar economic and political prowess as the king
of Israel. However, the Deuteronomistic historians are hardly favorable to Ahab or Jezebel.
Instead, Ahab is said to be even worse than his father (1 Kgs 16:30)!
Baal worship was on prominent display in Ahab’s kingdom. Ahab’s foreign wife,
5
Jezebel, was continuing the legacy of leading all of Israel astray. God, however, was now about
to confront Israel through the prophet Elijah. In chapter 17 of 1 Kings, Elijah brings Ahab a
message from God: “’As the Lord the God of Israel lives, before whom I stand, there shall be
For three years, Israel underwent an extreme drought. This is the fulfillment of the
Deuteronomistic curse for disobedience: “Take care, or you will be seduced into turning away,
serving other gods and worshiping them, for then the anger of the Lord will be kindled against
you and he will shut up the heavens, so that there will be no rain and the land will yield no fruit”
(Deut. 11:16-17). Furthermore, Moses warns the people in Deuteronomy 28 of the curses that
will accompany disobedience: “The Lord will afflict you with consumption, fever, inflammation,
with fiery heat and drought… The Lord will change the rain of your land into powder, and only
dust shall come down upon you from the sky until you are destroyed” (v. 22, 24).
The curse of disobedience has fallen upon the land, for which the king is greatly
responsible. The King is not only a political leader, but the religious leader of the community.
When he has taken the throne of his kingdom, he shall have a copy of this law
written for him in the presence of the levitical priests. It shall remain with him
and he shall read in it all the days of his life, so that he may learn to fear the Lord
his God, diligently observing all the words of this law and these statutes, neither
exalting himself above other members of the community nor turning aside from
the commandment, either to the right or to the left, so that he and his descendants
may reign long over his kingdom in Israel (17:18-20 NRSV).
Ahab hardly conformed to this mold. He aided the killing of the prophets of the Lord.
He had Naboth killed so that he might take his vineyard (1 Kgs 21). Not to mention, he
worshiped Baal due to the influence of his pagan wife. God was going to show who was
truly God!
Elijah presents himself to Ahab, confronting him about the unfaithfulness that
Ahab has shown to the Lord (18:18). Elijah has hardly come to enjoy a warm
conversation with the king. Instead, Elijah calls all of Israel, along with the prophets of
In the tradition of Moses, Elijah confronts the people with two choices that lie
before them in that moment. It echoes “choose blessing or curse, life or death” that
Moses had placed before the people before entering into Canaan. “Choose this day
whom you will serve.” Now, Elijah is offering the same prospect: choose Yahweh or
Baal!
So, we have the solitary figure of Elijah poised against the 850 prophets of
idolatry. It’s not as if God’s prophets are entirely extinct. But, there is significance in the
numbers. It is primarily about the centralization of worship opposed to the worship of the
high places, where people do as they see fit. There is one God and one way to worship
God.
Elijah, hardly being a gentleman, allows the prophets of false gods to go first. An
offering is placed on the altar… now, they simply have to call down fire to consume the
sacrifice. The prophets began calling upon Baal, the god of rain, to rain down fire upon
the bull. From morning until noon, the prophets called but to no avail. Smirking, Elijah
mocks their efforts, saying, “’Cry aloud! Surely he is a god; either he is meditating, or he
awakened’” (18:27). Provoked, the prophets cried louder and slashed themselves. Yet,
The form of worship exhibited by these prophets was blasphemous. First, they
7
worship the created rather than the Creator. Baal was nothing and could not answer in
response to the prayers of the prophets. Secondly, the prophets lacerated themselves,
causing themselves to bleed in order to placate the gods into action. Still nothing.
Deuteronomy warned, “You are children of the Lord your God. You must not lacerate
yourselves or shave your forelocks for the dead” (14:1). Israel’s form of worship must be
separate in every way from the surrounding cultures. However, as is evidenced by this
Now, Elijah has his turn. Elijah reconstructed the altar of Yahweh, choosing 12
stones that represented the 12 tribes of Israel. Next, he dug a trench around the altar and
cut wood for the sacrifice, cutting the bull into pieces which were laid on top. Finally,
Elijah called for four large jars of water to be filled and poured upon the bull, wood, and
altar. He instructed them to do this three times, until 12 jars had been filled and poured
out. The instructions were carried out until water soaked the entire offering and filled the
Elijah then prayed that God would answer and show His people that Yahweh
alone is God. He prayed that the hearts of the onlookers would be turned from Baal to
the Living God, from death to life. “Then the fire of the Lord fell and consumed the
burnt offering, the wood, the stones, and the dust, and even licked up the water that was
in the trench” (1 Kgs 18:38). Immediately, the people began to worship God!
the prophets of Baal and put them to the sword. The people were now living in covenant
faithfulness, led by Elijah. God had proved the victor, obedience was the only natural
response. It is in the final piece of this story that we see the covenant faithfulness of God
on full display.
Elijah prays that God will bring rain, ending the four year drought. After sending
a servant seven times to see if rain is coming, the servant affirms in the positive. The
echoes of Deuteronomy resound again, “If you will only heed his every commandment
that I am giving you today – loving the Lord your God, and serving him with all your
heart and with all your soul – then he will give the rain for your land in its season”
(11:13-14).
The story of Elijah reminds us, in the tradition of Deuteronomy, that we too have
a choice to make. Surrounded by the pluralistic cultures that inhabit the lands around us,
we must choose whom we will serve. We may serve the gods that promise wealth and
provision, or turn to the One who alone is our Provider. “See, I am setting before you
today a blessing and a curse: the blessing, if you obey the commandments of the Lord
your God that I am commanding you today; and the curse, if you do not obey the
commandments of the Lord your God, but turn from the way that I am commanding you
today, to follow other gods that you have not known” (11:26-28).
We must keep in mind the lesson we learn from Omri and Ahab: wealth and
power are not good indicators of a life well lived. Rather, it is how we live in obedience
to the Word of the Lord that is a true measure of our success. Drought may come, but we
Works Cited
Branson, Robert, Jim Edlin, Timothy M. Green, and Alex Varughese. Discovering the Old
Testament: Story and Faith. Kansas City: Beacon Hill Press of Kansas City, 2003.
The New Interpreter's Study Bible: New Revised Standard Version With the Apocrypha. New
9