Professional Documents
Culture Documents
1996
The Nation.
ICLES
HllIRY'S
RE-ELECTED!
ere we are, two minutes after the last American presidential election in the twentieth century, and Hillary Rodham Clinton is still
the most problematic First Lady in American history-admired
abroad, hated at home, mistrusted by women journalists even
though this Administration has actually done much good for
women. Suspected of being a megalomaniac, embroiled in documentlosing, spy-hiring, the suicide of an aide conjectured to be her lover,
and possible perjury; pilloried in the press and jeered at in political
cartoons; distrusted even by her admirers-can't Hillary do anything right? Why does she get no credit for all the positive things
she has done?
11
12
The Nation.
libraries on your
YES! Id like to adopt
high priority list of Nation-less libraries.
CII My check for $-($28
is enclosed.
State
Zip
Nouember25,1996
The old campaignbutton that trumpeted Elect Hillarys Husband in 92 showed a picture of Hillary, not Bill. Indeed, its
hard to remember it now. Its even hard to remember how Hillary
flouted the rules decreed for political wives: the obligatory Stepford Wife impersonation, the fake flirtatious flattery that makes
wives seem feminine and nonthreatening;the willingness to pretend to be the power behind the throne; the diplomatic surrender
to the role of First Lady.
The kaleidoscope of Hillary images and the frequently selfdestructive behavior of the First Lady are particularly regrettable
because both the ClintonAdministrationand the Clinton marriage
are historic. As a couple, the Clintons raise important issues about
both electoral and sexual politics. It is clear that without H.R.C.s
participation, Bill Clinton would have gone right down the Gary
Hart sewer. Because his wife stood by him in that first Barbara
Walters interview in 1992,because he did not exactly deny causing pain in the marriage while Hillary held his hand supportively, the first Clinton campaign was able to weather and rise above
what had been killing sexual crises for other presidential candidates. Unlike France, America does not coddle public adulterers.
Only the little woman can save them. She forgives,we forgive.
In those day-the first Clinton campaign-we were still hearing a lot about getting two for the price of one. Elect one, get one
free. Hillary was the freebie. Never before in American politics
had any couple campaigned this way. The very American ideal of
a power couple who add up to more than the sum of their parts
was put on the ballot in the 1992 election. America was enthusiastic about it then. Indeed, the Clinton candidacy looked bravely
feminist compared with the fuddy-duddy aura of Bush and Mrs.
Bush. But misogyny was far from dead, as we were soon to see.
he subsequent assault on Hillary demonstrated the entrenched
woman-hating both of the Americanpress and the bigotedpublic it so badly serves. When William Safire of The New York
Ernes called H.R.C. a congenital liar, surely he was subjecting her to a different standard fiom the one to which he had
held other First Ladies. Can anyone in the laser glare of the public
eye be expected to be candid all the time? Did anyone ask Pat
Nixon what she thought of her husbands destruction of evidence?
Was Nancy Reagan interrogated about Irangate? Certainly not.
But H.R.C.3 gene pool was impugned at the drop of a document.
With the roasting of Hillary it became clear that when we wish
womento fail, we decree for them endless and impossibleordeals,
like those that were devised for witches by their inquisitors. If
they drown, they are innocent; if they float, they are guilty. This
has pretty much been the way America has gotten rid of its
cleverest political women, from the feministsVictoria Woodhull
and Emma Goldman to Eleanor Roosevelt and the unsuccessful
vice-presidential candidate Geraldine Ferraro. And there is no
doubt that many people still wish H.R.C. to fail. Even now.
Clinton strategists-including the disgraced Dick Morriskept Hillary out of the limelight for most of the campaign. She
was only seen (but not heard) in proper helpmeet photo-ops
like the Atlanta Olympics, the Wyoming vacation and the exotic
E k a Joizg, poet and novelist, has recently published Fear of FiRy
(HarperCollin$, a midlife memoir. Her new novel will appear in the
spring.
November25.1996
13
The Nation.
him more. She excitedhim. Maybe she still does. After all, many
ports of call she visited with First Daughter Chelsea. America
powerful men yearn for the sting of a dominatrixs whip now
preferred-58 percent of men told pollsters that their view of
and then; it seems to b e a sovereign tonic for hubris.
Hillary was unfavorable-the duplicitous Southern charms of
One of the difficulties of being a smart, driven woman is findElizabeth Hanford Dole: a driven career woman with no children
ing men who are turned on by brains. Hillarys initial attachment
who claimsshe is pro-life, a chief Red Cross administrator who
to Bill probably had a lot to do with the excitement of finding
uses her powerfbl charity as a political tool of the Republican
such a fearless man. Later, it seems, she had invested so much
Party, a soft-spoken, flirfatiousbelle married to an old man, a sacof herself in the marriage and in the daughter they shared that
charine public speaker who used the Republican convention in
she wasnt willing to throw it all away even if faced with comSan Diego as an excuse to drown the delegates in treacle. Duplicity in women makes America comfortable; straightforward- pulsive, repeated infidelities. The stresses on H.R.C. have been
extreme, and one must say that despite them she has proved
ness does not. There was even, I learned, heated debate in the
an exemplary mother. She has protected Chelsea from the
White House about whether H.R.C. should speak at the Demomedia, allowed her the space
cratic convention or remain
out of sight and earshot.After The power struggle of the marriage influenced to grow into womanhood, put
her education ahead of poliLiddy Doles San Diego sethe power politics of the nation, and that is tics. As the mother of a teenduction, it was decided that,
however risky, Hillary had to
what is yadicalh new about this PyeSidency. age daughter,I honor H.R.C.
for what she has achieved.
speak. What a far cry from
Still, we have to look at the strangeness of the public image
1992, when Hillary was considered an asset! By the summer of
put forward by this revolutionarypresidential couple: They were
1996, she was a liability to be hidden. This is what four years
elected as a team but have absolutely refused to make the terms
of Hillary-hating had accomplished.
of their marriage public except to admit that he caused pain. It
:: he deal of the Clinton marriage fascinates me and I suspect is the &consistency of this position that has accountedfor a great
it fascinates a good portion of the electorate. It reflects our
deal of the trouble. If you vote for a couple, you feel entitled to
period better than any political marriage Ican think of.
know about the bonds that hold them together. But Hillary has
Clearly Hillary figured out in law school that if the time was
insisted that those bonds are private. People resent her determinot yet ripe for a woman President, it was likely to be ripe for
nation to have it both ways. But how on earth could the Clintons
a guy as driven and smart and personable as Bill Clinton. And
own,up to the details of Bills sex life? The fact that they have
she could be his chief adviser, patron (she made the moneyquashed the issue thus far is nothing short of a ,miracle. ,
The more you read about Bill Clinton, the more it .seemseviwith no small help from his political position) and disciplinarian.
dent that not only were there affairs but that he used his position
However much she warmed to his Southern charm, no matter
how much she loved him,his political ambition turned her on
as governor to facilitate them, using state troopers as beards and
panderers, getting them to pick up filly lihle gifts at Victorias
just as much.
Not that there is anythiugwrong with a marital deal.You might
Secret. But I assume that his erotic life is no better and no worse
even say that the more things that bind a couple together, the
than any other male politiciahs. lam, in general, so disillusioned
with male politicians that I actuallyprefer Bill Clinton the womanbetter chance they have of staying together. But theirs is a radical
izer to Bob Dole the deadbeat dad who dumped the first wife
deal for an American political marriage. H.R.C. has never staked
who nursed him through his famous war wounds. (Dole actually
out highway beautificationas her bailiwick (as did Lyndon Babes
got his political cronies to arrange an emergency divorce so he.
Johnsons wife, Lady Bird) or crusaded to put warning labels on
couldjettison the old wife and family more cheaply.)-Fuckingis
rock albums (once the one-woman campaign of Second Lady
fucking, but failihg to pay child support is a real ,crime.At least
Tipper Gore). On the contrary, she has claimed center stage with
top policy issues-however politically naive she may have been.
Bill Clinton didnt abandon his wife and child.
This audacity dazzled at first. But then, why should a First
illarys history is full of paradoxes.A baby boomer who grew
Lady stick to so-called womens issues? Hillary was always
up in a straight-arrowMethodist Republican-registeredfamily
policy-minded, always loath to be ghettoized ideologically. She
in a white, upwardly mobile suburb of Chicago, she became
was always far more serious than Bill, even in college and law
a left-leaning Democrat atwellesley;College. At Yale Law
school. He was a people pleaser. She was a woman who put inSchool she was studi&s, solitary, sole&, given to wearing
tellect first, which meant automatically that many men-and
flannel shirts and thick glasses, noted for her brilliance and hard
women-would not be pleased by her. One of the reasons she
work. Her mother, a closet Democrat, had compromisedwith her
hooked up with Bill was that he was the first man who seemed
not to be afraid of her intellectbut rather challenged and attractlife agd did not want Hillary to compromis&a familiar mothered by it. He was determined to get the smartest girl in the class,
daughter story. Her,fatherwas stern, unambiguouslyRepublican,
as an old Arkansas buddy of his told Roger Morris. He was sick
tight with money arid difficult to please. Imagine a girl like that
of beauty queens. If it isnt Hillary, its nobody, he informedhis
winning the good 01 boy who has been dating beauty queens! It
mother, cautioning her to be nice to Hillary before he brought
gives you an idea of how much his locking in on her (as one old
friend put it) must have meant to her.
her to meet the family in 1972.Though he apparently had nostalHillary is an appealing figure to me because her life shows
gia-and a use-for those beauty queens after he and Hillarywere
married, at the time of their courtship Hillarys brains thrilled
the strange compromises gifted women make. She.had already
~
14
The Nation.
November 25,1996
November 25,1996
15
The Nation.
happy housewife, a fierce feminist who has submerged her identity in her husbands ambitions. It doesnt add , u p t o o m h y
contradictions-which is why we dont believe it. The pearls and
pink put on for the campaign-as well as the new, practiced smiling-are not totally convincing either. We expect Lady Macbeth
to reappear, rubbing the blood from her hands.
We should weep for Hillary Cligton rather than revile her. She
is a perfect example of why life is so tough for brainy women. The
deformations of her public image reveal the terrible contortions
expected ofAmericanwomen. Look pretty but be (secretly)smart.
C o d o m in public; cry in private. Make the money but dont seem
to be aggressive. Swallow everything your husband asks you to
swallow, but somehow keep your. own identity. Hillary shows us
just how impossibleall these conflicting demands are to Mill.
me
U.