Professional Documents
Culture Documents
01/09/15
Preface
This 30 ECTS point thesis marks the ending
of my master studies in landscape architecture with a specialization in Urban
Design at the University of Copenhagen,
Faculty of Science.
I would like to take the opportunity to
thank my supervisor Gertrud Jrgensen
for guiding me through the project and
for her specific insight in showing me relevant literature and her inputs regarding
model building to visualize my project.
I would also like to thank Niels Boje Groth
for his alternative critical views on my
ideas and helping me along the way.
Abstract
As urbanization continues to rise in
Denmark as well as globally, Tall buildings
are increasingly being constructed in
cities around the world to accommodate
the population growth. Denmark saw the
arrival of its first tall building following the
World War II, with a particular inspiration
from the modernist movement, CIAM
(Congres International dArchitecture
Moderne). Since then, different planning
periods have influenced the development of and against tall buildings in
Copenhagen.
This thesis explores tall buildings and their
urban life in and around Copenhagen.
Different types of tall buildings are established
through an investigation of the existing
tall buildings in Copenhagen.
Design proposals for selected tall buildings
is developed in search of possible potentials
to enhance the public space around
them.
Abstrakt
Urbanisering fortstter med at stige i
Danmark svel som globalt.
Dette betyder at hjhuse i stigende grad
bliver bygget i byer rundt om i verden for
at imdekomme befolkningstilvksten.
Det frste hjhus projekt p dansk jord
blev opfrt efter Anden Verdenskrig, med
srlig inspiration fra den modernistiske
bevgelse, CIAM (Congres International
dArchitecture Moderne).
Siden har forskellige planlgnings
paradigmer pvirket udviklingen af og
imod hjhuse i Kbenhavn.
Denne afhandling udforsker hjhuse og
deres byliv i og omkring Kbenhavn.
Forskellige typologier af hjhuse er blevet
konstateret igennem en analyse af de
eksisterende hjhuse i Kbenhavn.
Design forslag med henblik p at
undersge mulige potentialer for at
stimulere det offentlige liv i relation til
hjhuse, er skabt ved udvalgte cases
Table of content
Introduction
p.8
Structure of thesis
p.12
p.15
CIAM
p.17
p.18
p.19
p.21
1990s - Renaissance
p.22
p.24
Nature vs city
p.26
p.29
p.37
Case summary
p.42
p.45
p.55
Chapter 5: Discussion
p.94
Conclusion
p.98
Reference List
p.99
Apendix
p.101
Introduction
The existing tallest structure in Copenhagen
is the spire of the Danish parliament at
106m; second place the town house at
102m and then Vor frelsers church 91m
high..
The highest structures in Copenhagen are
political or religious symbols. This stands in
contrast to the majority of other big
cities around the world where tall buildings
dominate the skyline.
Inquisitiveness, eagerness to understand
constantly hit me whenever I travel
abroad through different metropolis of
the world.
Copenhagen, in comparison even to
smaller cities, seems to have a
characteristically low skyline. This made
me wonder why?
Does it pertain to the local opinion
regarding tall buildings? I have for as
long as I can remember felt attracted to
city life with its energy, hustle and bustle. Maybe, it is because I come from a
sleepy town in Northern Zealand, where
there is not much happening outside the
local supermarket.
I was eager to move to the capital of
Denmark, by far the biggest city in the
country.
It has to be mentioned here that my
The thesis focus on tall buildings in Copenhagen and the urban life around them.
To start off this topic the thesis will presents some common assumedly
positive and negative aspects of the tall building:
10
Objective
The aim of this thesis is to explore the
urban development around existing tall
buildings, how do they contribute to their
context.
Considerable factors may be how tall
buildings meet the ground, enliven the
street and avoid casting shadows on key
spots.
I will engage in this topic by understanding the Danish circumstances in the development of tall buildings, from the
ideas of modernism up till today. Based
on the above issues this thesis will aim at
answering:
To what extent can urban life be stimulated around tall buildings in Denmark?
This thesis is not a solution for the planning
of tall buildings in the municipality of Copenhagen, it only presents a small aspect
of tall buildings, and should be seen as a
possibility out of many and as an input to
a debate of the topic.
Method
First knowledge on the history of topic is
gained through relevant literature.
Simultaneous to the study of literature,
field trip observations in Copenhagen
were made.
11
Structure of thesis
A brief summary of the structure of this
thesis. First chapter will run through the
history of the tall building, from the birth
of tall buildings in north America through
to Europe where another version of the
tall building seemed to be shaped by the
CIAM movement.
Then the thesis will focus on the Danish
circumstances that have influenced the
development of tall buildings in Copenhagen.
Second chapter, a guide through the
chosen theory used to analyze the different
tall buildings found in the Copenhagen
area.
Third chapter contains summary of the 16
cases throughout greater Copenhagen.
Based on the findings different types of
tall buildings are categorized. This set the
division of 3 tall building typologies.
Fourth chapter, a case study of the tall
building typologies results in design proposals of possible potentials found in the
public space around two existing tall
buildings projects.
Fifth and last chapter presents the discussion
and conclusion of the content in the thesis.
An appendix with the 16 cases of tall
buildings in Copenhagen as well as a
process of design drawings and model
photos is made.
12
Diagram 2: Same building will not be classified a tall buildingwithin a tall context
13
14
15
Van Eesterens proposal for Rokin, a tall building, arguely forms an equilibrium between tall and low, old and
new.(Guarda, 2013)
16
CIAM
However while tall buildings were not
built in Europe as in North America, a
highly influential european urban group
was founded in Europe, the CIAM (Congres Internationaux dArchitecture Moderne) movement. The growth of the European cities, as well as the problems that
followed; such as urban unsanitary and
overcrowded living condition
associated with poverty, were recognized
at the CIAM congress in Athens in 1933
and would later be included in the
Athens Charter, a document for modern
planning published by Le Corbusier
(Corbusier, 1943).
That document would turn out to be highly
influential in European urban planning
and tall building developments of the
19th century.
Cornelius van Eesteren, an influential
Dutch urban planner, became the
chairman of the CIAM movement in the
1930s (Guarda, 2013). He became internationally known through his participation
in international architectural
competitions and his participation in the
Dutch de Stilj group.
His first entry (1925) was for the
transformation of the canal street Rokin
in Amsterdam (see photo below).
At that time, Amsterdam consisted, like
Copenhagen of a building structure of
predominately 4-5 floors.
Eesteren argued for an interruption of the
classic 4-5 floors buildings in the city of
Amsterdam, with a strong vertical
component(p.82 Guarda, 2013).
This component should define the street
aesthetically.
The jury did not see the potential though
and the project did not pass the first
evaluation round.
17
150 meter
150 meter
100 meter
50 meter
50 meter
18
19
Chicago, The birth place of the tall building as it is today. The buildings strive for height is symbolic of the
american rooted tall building (Skyscrapercity, retrieved 17/05/15)
20
21
1990s Renaissance
for the city and a symbol of improvement
had a renaissance from the late 1980s and
throughout the 1990s.
In Copenhagen this time around, globalization and competition between cities
to attract investors and wealthy taxpaying citizens, was the main driver (Bisgaard,
2010). The American concept of the tall
building thus seemed to be the main
inspiration. The tall building could be seen
as a landmark, icon, and a signature of the
position of the city. It was seen as a way
of signaling success and hopefully attract
high income citizens.
However, even though a certain political
will in favor of the tall building was returning, the breakthrough of tall buildings was
long in coming. A lot of people remained
skeptical, both local citizens and professional. Architects were incentivized to create projects with taller buildings without
their consensus(Hansen, 1994).
The lack of embracement from the professionals themselves is likely to have been
one of the reasons why almost no tall building got built in the 1990s Copenhagen in
spite of the political will to do so. The tall
penhagen at the turn to the new millennium.
Indeed, a favorable economic climate in
the beginning of the 00s saw a lot of new
investment in Copenhagen. In 2005, Mayor Ritt Bjerregrd, wanted a debate about
tall buildings to be on the political agenda
(Bisgaard, 2010). She saw a strategy for tall
buildings necessary in Copenhagen as a
response number of
22
prestige projects had failed to be completed. Prior to 2005, tall buildings could be
built everywhere, pending a case by case
approval.
This created great uncertainty for investors,
among other illustrated by the failure of
the Norman Foster (Tivoli hotel), a tall building project next to the town hall at Tivoli,
cancelled due to public protest (Bisgaard,
2010).
Upon this backdrop, a desire to make a
thorough tall building strategy emerged,
with the aim to highlight functions and
neighborhoods of the city.
No tall building strategy made it into legislation though. On the contrary, the public debate the mayor Bjerregrd had
initiated, ended with a bylaw prohibiting
constructions of tall buildings in the inner
city. Hence, outside the inner city of Copenhagen, tall building projects are still assessed as on a case by case basis by the
municipality
23
24
public areas high up, as roof tops for instance, to achieve higher density of open
spaces, the ground level gets to packed/
narrow/crammed. This way, the tall building becomes an active part of the city and
can contribute to its aesthetic and functional character. This can also help integrate the building to its surroundings, and
break down traditional barriers between
the public and private space.
An example of seeking integration of the
public vertically in tall buildings in Copenhagen is seen in the LM project in Marmormolen, North habour. Here two tall
buildings should stand on each dock with
the oslo ferries going in between them. A
bridge in 65 meter height (to allow the Oslo
ferry to pass under) should connect the two
tall buildings. The bridge would be open to
the public with platform, a bike path and
elevators.
Proposal for two tall buildings, with a public accessible bridge by Steven Hall (skyscrapercity,
retrived 22/08/15)
big scale in the spaces around and thereof the building and the public space is important to soften the big scale (Pedersen,
2011).
According to Poul Bk Pedersen the biggest challenge to achieve a compact sustainable city in Denmark is the legislations
and regulation regarding height limits for
construction such as in the Danish planning act and local plans. The authorities
must have the courage to build dense and
even tall he argues
Public space
Public space
Public space
Public
space
Public
space
Public
space
Public
space
Public
space
25
Summing up
As mentioned above, climate, historical
developments and legislative frameworks
of or against the tall building and their urban spaces in Copenhagen.
In parallel to the above reasons, the perception of nature also plays a big part
in shaping the de toward tall buildings in
Denmark.
26
A public debate
A tall building project made by Tivoli, started an organization, called Tivolis venner
(Tivolis friends), who in spite of the name
were against the plans made by Tivoli
(Tivolisvenner.dk, 2015). The project was a
100 meter slim hotel next to the town hall.
The protest resulted in a cancellation; as
did a 55 meter tall project on Kryers plads
made by Ege Van Eegeraat. A survey
made by Rambll in 2006 found that 1/3
of the citizens of Copenhagen would not
like to live close to a tall building. (analysis institution Rambll in Berlingske Tidende
29.11.2006).
One of the leitmotivs in the arguments
used against tall buildings in Copenhagen
seems to be that they will destroy the skyline of old spires from the towers of the city.
This was also a main argument to ban all
tall buildings inside the old town of Copenhagen in 2005 (By&havn, 2015 ). The public
protests may have protected the city for
further harm in the shape of over dimensioned urban and wind turbulent spaces or
it may have haltered progress to a typology that can be a tool to obtain a sustainable city.
27
28
Based on societal and architectural design aspects chosen by the author, the tall
buildings and their urban life are analyzed. Some of the aspects are based on concrete theory on the subject, others are based on observation and research on the
site.
The aspects of the tall buildings are:
Function (monotoni)
Sunlight
Traffic
Faade
Wind
29
30
Function (Monotoni):
Building can shape the identity or the function of an area Is it monotonous or sticking
out? Does the building help the orientation? Orientation is based on the natural
structures we can identify. If we cant make
an image of the system we feel lost (Lynch,
1960).
Lynch criticizes projects with repetitive
structures and lack of human scale that
leaves the human without a sense of belonging. Projects inspired by the CIAM
movement can be seen as more based on
the function of the place than creating an
identity.
31
32
33
Traffic:
Sunlight:
Plenty of sun exposure has been highlighted
by Gehl as a major factor for creating recreational attractive urban places in Denmark.
How are the buildings affecting the public
space with shadows around the building?
New York had already in the 1920s implemented a regulation that ensures sun light
to the street by making the high-rises slimmest at the top.(Pedersen 2011)
The thoughts of the modern city by Corbusier are based on the notion that everybody will receive sunlight. The modernistic
tall buildings indeed tend to have larger
34
Faade:
Steen Rasmussen states, to experience architecture one must be aware of all the elements and their effects, such as hardness
or softness of a building (Rasmussen 1959).
The faade has a great impact on the experience of buildings. It can be simple or
have a characteristic expression; it can
appear heavy or light.
mally less strong than in rural areas (Jensen, 2014). But wind turbulence can still occur more frequently around tall buildings
than in other areas, as the tall buildings
sticks out and captures a lot wind. Making
small scale shifts or set backs to a wider
base building can prevent some wind turbulence at the bottom of the building; additionally an aero dynamic design of the
tall building can prevent/reduce the effect of wind turbulence. This can be done
by rounding the building(Jensen, 2014).
Wind:
Dense urban areas provide shelters from
mean winds thus the wind in cities is nor-
35
36
37
This chapter will apply the previously outlined aspects to selected tall buildings in
Copenhagen and aim at categorizing
them. The cases have been selected due
to their location and height. The height
nicipality of Copenhagen on tall buildings.
The location is sought around Copen-
38
39
Radisson
1970
Sas Hotel
1959
Lundtofte
1969
Brndby strand
1973
Bella Hj
1951
Domus Vista
1969
Sorgenfrivang
1957
Hje gladsaxe
1960
1950
40
1960
Rigshospitalet
1970
1970
1980
Bella Sky
2011
Amerika plads
2002-08
Islands Brygge
2014 -
restaden
2002 -
Panum
2015
Turning Torso
2001
Slvkysten Amager
2014 -
1990
2000
2010
2020
41
Case Summary
7 tall building projects with strong associations to CIAM have been found
Bellahj
Sorgenfrivang
Hjegladsaxe
Lundtofte
Brndby strand
Domus vista
Rigshospitalet
42
Summary
Building on the cases analyzed, a division between the tall buildings has been
made by the author. A clear association
is observed between tall buildings built
after modernistic principles. Single standing tall buildings seeking attention, as the
American version of the tall building is as
well found in several cases. Finally an ensemble, a cluster of slim tall buildings, is
found at several contemporary projects in
Copenhagen; thus creating 3 types of tall
buildings: A CIAM tall building, American
rooted tall building and a group of slim tall
buildings.
A further distinction can also be made between projects that are placed outside
existing urban areas and projects that
are transforming existing urban areas or in
a close proximity to existing urban areas.
This is most relevant in modernistic CIAM
inspired tall buildings where e.g. Lundtoftegade is tall buildings built in an urban
context, while e.g. Hje Gladsaxe is built
in a more open context. Both have clear
bonds to the modernistic principles.
In the following section the thesis will look
more into the 3 tall building typologies.
43
44
will receive sunlight. Indeed, while the modernistic tall buildings tend to be bigger and
wider than the American towers, thereby
casting more shadow, they have larger
spaces between them allocating plenty of
sunlight receiving areas to the area.
The car was planned to be the main form
of transportation. This is why many projects
have accommodated the need of the car
by constructing wide parking areas into
the plans. Additionally, sidewalks are often
45
photo from Hje Gladsaxe. Large green spaces keep the FAR low on the plot
46
Critique:
The big open spaces created in between
the buildings create a public realm that do
not seem to have any intimacy and feels
uncomfortable. Cheap building materials results in damaged apartments and the
cars not the people have taken over the
landscape.
Wind turbulences are heavy around the
freestanding CIAM tall buildings. These are
unpleasant in a cold climate like the one in
Copenhagen. The projects have vast open
Conclusion:
The CIAM inspired tall buildings had good
intention by providing better habitations for
the urban dweller. But public realm around
the tall buildings seems to suffer. Over dimensioned outdoor spaces with no intimacy spaces, permanent wind turbulences and a repetitive structure that give no
sense of belonging to local residents are
some issues reigning in these areas.
The placement of the buildings, faced
away from the street, do not contribute to
the street life around it. The parking often
in between the buildings and street seems
to further distance the buildings from any
public life around them.
47
48
grid.
The faade is crucial to the experience
building over a lower base. The building is
often seen in Copenhagen with a lighter
top and a darker base, a way to create
a lighter atmosphere into the townscape
and prolong the seasons. The limited light
the building, while the darker base will absorb the heat and create an urban heat
island.
49
Criticism:
The American rooted tall building often
does not really contribute to the public
realm around it after hours. It can seem
to be disconnected to the urban life and
the neighboring buildings, thereby making
it a monolith in the city. It often contains
big parking lots around it which further reinforce the lack of human connection to
the building.
The sharp height difference attracts a lot of
wind and creates wind turbulence around
the tower, which makes it unpleasant for
any stay at the bottom.
Conclusion:
The single standing American tall building
is a highly noticeable element in Copenhagen. It creates a new dynamic in the
city but it tends to be like a disintegrated
fragment, not relating to its context. The
lack of interaction between the building
and its local context can give an oppressive expression for people in it, a lack of
human scale. Parking lots and unpleasant
winds are other negative factors.
The slim proportion of the tower makes it
more suitable for the climate in Denmark
than the wider CIAM tall building, because
of the reduced shadowing. It can even
with a dark base and a light top.
50
facades.
At the same time the multiple tall buildings
relate to each other thereby creating a
dynamic rhythm in the contrast between
tall and low as Eesteren has described.
Intimate public spaces found in a Group of slim tall building area, East Amager
51
52
2011).
The faade tend to have unique features
in each tall building though having common traits. This could be of materials, colors, the shape of windows/balconies etc.
Wind turbulence can be prevented or reduced in dense urban areas, if planned
carefully. With integration of lower buildings
next to the slim tall building and/or letting
bigger buildings shelter others, wind turbulence at the bottom will be less strong. A
high density with small scale steps can help
shelter for the wind by letting the wind pass
over the buildings (Jensen, 2014). This is
seen implemented to some extent in GSTB
projects.
Criticism:
The GSTB typology can have far reaching
negative consequences if the tall buildings
do not land well as they are large sized.
The landmark effect of each tall building
ects. The tall buildings become a trivial/ordinary building typology that does not give
an identity to the area because it exists all
over.
GSTB has high density and highly dense
built areas can put strains on open public
spaces. The amount of sun receiving public spaces could be pressured if the public
realm is not integrated vertically which still
lacks to be seen to a large extent in the
GSTB projects in Copenhagen.
The GSTB has the goal of attracting wealthy
taxpaying citizens. This could create an exclusive homogenization of the area for only
one social class, thus reducing the diversity
and possibly the public life in the area.
Conclusion:
The GSTB given their large size is built over
several years, even decades; this can be
a quality as so feedback during the process can modify the project according to
53
54
55
DESIGN CONCEPT
HJE GL ADSAXE
The case
T hrough regis tr ations and inter views on site, a foundation for a design con cept in Hje Glads axe has been developed
Is sues found relating to the urban life: wind turbulences, lack of intimac y, a
repetitive plain s truc ture and no visible connec tion bet ween front and back
of the t all building s.
A visible connec tion bet ween the wide open spaces and the other building
side towards the s treet, is desired; Fur thermore intimate spaces, s timulating a sense of owner ship for the lo c al resident s as well as a protec tion from
the wind are likewise ways desired.
Many tall building s projec t s of the t ypolo g y, CIAM inspired tall building s
cont ain a lot of similar is sues to their urban life. Hence this projec t c an
ser ve as an inspir ation or guideline to other c ases while being aware of spe cif ic conditions on each site.
T he gar a ges and their s tr uc tured spac es in b et we en the t all building s are found
to have p otentials. From lo c al s t akeholder s i t b e c ame ev ident that the f unc tion of
c ar gar a ges is not desired to b e changed, bu t that an ac ti v i t y in c ombination wi th
the e x is ting c ould b e a p os sibili t y.
56
HJE GL ADSA XE
To understand the area, I have made field trip registrations of the area. Here
photos of building and the visual character of the site
57
FLOW REGISTRATIONS
Flow registrations
Flow regis tr atio n, Walk ing p e ople - Made o n si te
26.05.1 5 14.0 0 -17.0 0
T he resident s are pleas ed ab ou t their par king gar ages and do not want them to
b e remove d
S c ale that mi ght change. At the s quared building blo ck, lower building for ming
a mo re clos ed building
Ty p olo g y ne x t to the t all building s, there are more p e ople using the area, such
as ur ban f ar min g
C over in g o r prote c tio n f ro m the wind in ou tdo o r spac es will b en ef i t the area
58
MOODBOARD
IN THE CIT Y
Sur rounde d by nature
I have established the issues on the site as e.g. the lack of public spaces
in a smaller scale. This moodboard highlights some of the qualities on the
site that i want to incoporate in my design
59
SITUATION PLAN
1:150 0
Hje gladsaxe
The area in focus is the existing car garages. The squared form contain a potential for a more intimate room for the locals, as well as being a link bet ween the
front and back of the tall buildings
60
FOCUS AREA
61
I have in my sketch work, tested a lot of ideas, that all had the issues relating to
the site as star ting points. I worked with the idea of the stair and the rooftop being
a central element for stay and causal meetings. While working fur ther the garage
structures, turned out to be great as a dynamic link bet ween the back and the front
of the buildings.
62
- Jan Gehl
63
MOODBOARD
Roof ga rden
64
MOODBOARD
Stai rcase
65
MOODBOARD
Ya rd activit y
66
3D SKE TCHING
67
LIGHT
REGISTRATION
20 Apr il
11.0 0 - 19.0 0
2 0 Apr i l 11.0 0
Based on the light registration it is clear that
the yards are situated
on the nor th side of the
buildings; but because
of the gap bet ween the
buildings there will be
sunllight in par ts of the
yard all day
2 0 Apr i l 13.0 0
2 0 Apr i l 15.0 0
2 0 Apr i l 17.0 0
2 0 Apr i l 19.0 0
68
PERSPECTIVE
Hje gladsaxe
69
DESIGN PROPOSAL
PL AN AND SECTION
1:15 0 0 0
Hje gladsaxe
70
71
DE TAILED PL AN 1:3 0 0
0.0 G roundfloor - Cour t ya rd
0.1 4 m Hight - G reen roof top
0.1
0.0
72
CONCEPT 1
G rass
CONCEPT 2
Stone
Design solution
B reak down the repetitive str ucture of the a rea; 4 dif ferent ya rds, the
same design concept, but 4 dif ferent expressions and functions.
73
CONCEPT 3
Water
CONCEPT 4
Trees
PL AN DRAWING
1:500
74
3 D V I S UA L I Z AT I O N
I llustration of the rooftop, a place for recreation, sheltered by a transpa rent wall from the wind.
I llustration of the stai rs in front of the cou r t ya rd, a possible meeting place
in bet ween neighbo rs
75
76
DESIGN KONCEPT
RADISSON HOTEL
The case
Based on registrations and interviews, a design concept for Radisson is developped.
The La rge pa r k i ng lots and the tal l st r uctu re have an opp resive feel i ng on the
visito r, mak i ng o r ientation and the sense of belong i ng dif f icult. The w i nd is al so
dom i nati ng the a rea.
Radisson do not have any u r ban l ife o r any connection to its local contex t
despite its cent ral location.
Many tal l bui ldi ngs p rojects of the t ypology, Ame r ican rooted tal l bui ldi ngs
conta i n a lot of si m i la r issues to thei r u r ban l ife. Hence this p roject can se r ve as
an inspiration or guideline to other cases while being aware of specific conditions
on each site.
A connection to the sou r roundi ng cit y is desi red. Creati ng an i nviti ng a rea,
that g ives the publ ic l ife oppo r tunit y fo r stay w ith an sense of safet y and
belong i ng of the site.
77
RADISSON HOTEL
To understand the area, I have made field trip registrations of the area. Here photos of building and the visual character of the site
78
Flow registrations
Summer d r y day, not pa r ticula r y windy.
few use the a rea for stay, only nea r the hotel entrance 5 -10 min. The rest use
the a rea as transit
Question 1:
Most of the people inter viewed was associated to the hotel, either tour ist or
working. 2 out of 16 inter vied were not going to or from the hotel. This shows
that few from outside use the area,
Question 2 :
Mainly to walk to or from the hotel intrance. Stay near the bottom for (smoke)
break or wait for taxi or others.
Question 3 :
summar y of the answers: Change the tall building (facade), it is ugly. Change
the parking lots, get r id of them. Give the space more green or more stay op por tunities.
79
MOODBOARD
I have established that one of the issues in the area is the lack of integration with its context.
This moodboard highlights some of the qualities on the site that i want to incoporate in my
design
80
- Kevin Lynch
81
82
FOCUS AREA
SITUATION PLAN
1:150 0
Radisson Hotel
Gas station
Parking
Green areas
The focus area is the southern par t of the plot. The area is characterized by parking
lots and a gas station. The tall building visually dominates the area without any sense
of belonging for the obser ver
83
CO N CE P T SKE TCH I N G
I have in my sketch work, tested a lot of ideas, that all had the issues relating to the site as
star ting point. I have as e.g. worked with the idea of a furniture with sails to protect against
the wind. I discovered though that I had to work with a design that grabs the whole area
south of Radisson with its parking lots. Thus an idea to work with a parking house as green
hill, that both offer a lively public space as well as solving the parking issue.
84
MOODBOARD
Activ hi ll
85
MOODBOARD
Pa r k ing faci l it y
86
D E V E LO PI N G D E S I G N
CONCE PT
Based on my registrations, sketches and work developing the design concept, the design
concept is taking shape
18
Q4 = L: 39m H 12m Q3 = L: 39m H 12m
Q2 = L: 39m H 12m
Q1 = L: 39m H 12m
87
3 D SKE TCH I N G
88
S I T UAT I O N PL A N
Situation plan; showing the recreational connection from the Radisson plot to
neighboring recreational areas
1.20 0 0
89
W O R K D R AW I N G S
Plan and section
1.150 0
90
W O R K D R AW I N G S
Plan and section
1.10 0 0
91
3 D V I S UA L I Z AT I O N
Illustration showing the gas station integrated into the new parking house with small
greener y in front.
Illustration, view from the hotel entrance, the hill and a public path in front generating
a public flow through the plot
92
I llustration showing the roof of the pa r k ing house with possibilities for stay
and long sightl ines
A protected niche is created where the public will want to stay, Radisson hill.
The existing parking lots are replaced by a parking house that will be street
bound and embed the gas station; but more impor tantly the parking house
will break down the larged scale imposed on the visitor.
Lifted up overground, the public will have a secure over view of the plot. The
impact of the tall building can be obser ved as well as sightlines to
Amagernaturepark and the for tification of Copenhagen. The hill will have
references to the sour rounding landscape, the for tifcation of Copenhagen
with its hills as well as connecting existing recreational areas to it.
93
94
5. Discussion
95
Tall buildings projects are evolving in Copenhagen as shown with the typology
group/ensemble of slim tall buildings. The
ensemble tries to adapt and improve issues tall buildings in 20th century have exWhile the urbanization continues and Copenhagens population increases current
tall building projects today must prove
that they can increase density without
compromising the urban life around it; or
96
The construction of 5 round shaped buildings, the highest being 61 meters, Axel towers, are planned to have a public square
promises of an active urban life around it.
Proposal by BIG, for the new parlement in Oslo (Aftenposten, retrieved 12/05/15)
97
98
Conclusion:
I have learnt as Toderian puts it:
taken to create a sense of intimacy, shelter against the wind or connect the public
better to the building and its site.
However each tall building project in Copenhagen is unique and the generalizations are merely a guideline for plausible
challenges for the urban life around tall
buildings
(Toderian, 2015).
The thesis has worked with issues relating to
the urban life around tall buildings in Copenhagen. This had led to an exploration of
the history of the planning paradigms, the
public debate and other factors that have
shaped the tall building development and
its urban life in Copenhagen. As a result of
case analyzes, 3 different tall building typologies have been created, The CIAM tall
building, the American rooted tall building and the ensemble of tall slim buildings.
A further investigation on the CIAM and
American rooted tall building has led to
2 case studies with design proposals. The
proposals can serve as a tool to tackle similar issues of other tall building projects especially within the same typologies.
The tall buildings have often, even in contemporary projects, a negative on the urban life around them; in Copenhagen especially wind, scale and lack of coherence
with context are pronounced. In order to
stimulate these areas, measures can be
99
Reference list:
Aften posten, 2015 - En mulighet til markere regjeringsmakten www.aftenposten.no (Retrieved 12/05/ 2015)
Andersson, S., 1988. Bygninger og landskab : spredte tanker om at ligge smukt i landskabet Kunstakademiets Arkitektskole.
Andersson, S. I et al. Parkpolitik boligomrderne, byerne og det bne land, Dansk Byplanlaboratoriums skriftserie nr. 29, 1984.
Bisgaard, H,. 2010. Kbenhavns Genrejsning 1990-2010, Bolvrket.
CTBUH, 2015. Council on Tall Buildings and Urban Habitat. Symposium at Henning Larsen HQ, Copenhagen, 26 may 2015.
Danish coastal authority, Kystdirektoratet, ministry of environment (2015), http://www.kyst.dk/
(17.04.2015)
100
sity press
Pedersen, P., 2011. Sustainable Compact city( Bredygtig kompakt by), Arkitektskolens forlag
3 edition 2011
Planstyrelsen, 2011. Miljministeriet rapport, ministry of environment: Hjhuse og byarkitektur.
Rasmussen, S., E., 1994. Kbenhavn Et bysamfunds srprg og udvikling gennem tiderne. G E C GADS forlag
Rasmussen, S., E., 1949. Byer og Bygninger, Fremad Kbenhavn. 1949
Rasmussen,S., E., 1959. experiencing architecture 1959
Rasmussen, S., E., 1951. Kbenhavnsegnens planlgning : status 1950
Revsbech, K., 1987. Reform af dansk planlovgivning en vurdering, rhus universitet.
Rdtnes, M et al., 2005. Hjhushndbog Et grundlag for planlgning vurdering og 3D-visualisering af hje huse.
rhus Kommune.
Skyscrapercity, 2015 - internet forum with news and discussions on urban developments around the world.
www.skyscrapercity.com (Photos retrieved, April - June 2015)
Toderian, B., 2015. Tall Tower Debates Could Use Less Dogma, Better Design. http://www.planetizen. node/69073
(Retrieved 12/06/2015)
Local plans and city plan regulations obtained from the municipalities of Copenhagen:
-
SAS hotel. Servitude protocol XIII nr. 134 (1952) (Retrieved 31/3/15)
Islands brygge South Lokalplan nr. 410 Artellerivej syd (2013) (retrieved 02/04/15)
101
Appendix
102
DRAWING INFORMATION
A DRAWING:
B DRAWING:
Scale:
Plan
Section
1:4000
No: 1 and 2
DRAWING A
Above 8 floors
3-8 floors
1-2 floors
Parking area
NORTH
DRAWING B
103
Byplanvedtgt 23).
Describsen:
green area in front. It is built with a prefabrication technique, which just began to get used in
FAR: 30% in the total plot with big open green areas as well as parking. As low or lower than many
single family house area.
Relation to other buildings: Part of hje gladsaxe consist of lower buildings.The low rises seem
separated in context with the tall buildings, although they are part of the Hje gladsaxe plan. The
lower building are more enclosed and resemble the block structure. North of the tall buildings, the
football stadium of Gladsaxe relate in width to some extent to the tall buildings. South of the tall
buildings a vast park area descends until Tingbjerg, that have one tall building as a marker of that
area. There is a social relationship with Tingbjerg, that is also visually connected across the highway
south of Hje Gladsaxe Tingbjerg is as Hje Gladsaxe a large scale project of social housing
104
Free outdoor spaces: Huge wide open area south of the buildings and parking lots on the other side
towards the street. There is plenty of open space available for the public.
Lower floors relation to street level: A center in the eastern part of the towers, which was planned as
serving everyday needs for the buildings. But no connection between the buildings lower floor and
the streetscape as parking lots dominate.
Function (Monotonies): The dominance of single houses in the suburbs is interrupted by 5, in context,
monumental buildings. These buildings are creating the function for the area and with their size, total
length approximately 600 meters, give a monotonous expression of the area from within.
Position in relation to the street: Buildings placed away from the street with wide open spaces in front
and behind. It does not relate to the street.
Visibility(far vs. local): Standing on top of a topography which slopes down towards a major high
way, theses towers have significant impact on the image of the area and far beyond. Locally the tall
buildings do not seem to function as any landmark but are seem as a plain repetitive structure.
Sunlight: To the south are huge open lower green areas, which allow a lot of sun intake to visitors as
well as the buildings. The parking side is primary shaded with a gap between the tall buildings to let
some light in.
Traffic. Highway running nearby. A lot of parking places dominating the spaces in front of the tall
buildings as so the area seems planned for the car. A bus service is connecting downtown Copenha
gen and Hje Gladsaxe.
Wind condition: No real feeling of intimacy or shelter from the wind, only a few trees in the wide
open green area near the towers create some shelter for the wind.
Summary:
Hje Gladsaxe, have 5 very massive tall buildings that in proportion just seem more big than
high, despite their height of 50 meters. The
spaces around the repetitive buildings and
plain facades are not stimulating for the public
life. The open spaces is over dimen
sioned and do not shelter from an
apparent permanent wind turbulence. Standing on top of a hill looking over the Copenhagen region these tall buildings are icons for the
area they stand in, Gladsaxe, and also for the
Copenhagen.
105
DRAWING INFORMATION
A DRAWING:
B DRAWING:
Scale: 1:2000
No: 3 and 4
Plan
Section
Above 8 floors
3-8 floors
1-2 floors
Parking area
NORTH
106
DRAWING B
FAR: 108%
Relation to other buildings: The buildings stand in symbioses with each other.
They only relate to them selves and not surrounding neighborhoods.
Free outdoor spaces: The towers are placed inside a parc. You literately seem
to walk into the park from the doorstep of the building.
Lower floors relation to street level: The buildings follows the topography and
play into the environment
Sunlight: The buildings are placed to each other to allow a maximum of light in
fall. A lot of open areas with high sun intake is also available.
road.
Towers in a parc.
Wind condition: a lot of wind around the area. Trees seems to reduce to some
degree the amount of wind turbulences.
Summary:
The placement and adaption to the terrain is particular for the area, with height differences the buildings in between. However Bellahj has a lot of characteristic in common with other modernistic tall
buildings. It has a monotonous
facades and anonymous meeting with the ground. A seemingly over dimensioned park area embeds
faced away from the main street.
107
DRAWING INFORMATION
A DRAWING:
B DRAWING:
Scale:
Plan
Section
1:4000
No: 5 and 6
Above 8 floors
3-8 floors
DRAWING A
1-2 floors
Parking area
DRAWING B
108
NORTH
FAR= 77%
Relation to other buildings: The towers stand in a row and relate to each other.
Lower buildings are placed in between and create smaller, more intimate
public rooms.
Free outdoor spaces: A green corridor (50 meter wide approximately) runs
along the row of tall buildings, for recreational use.
Lower floors relation to street level: Anonymous meeting with the ground. The
building lands directly with no base building.
Monotonies: Highly monotonous and repetitive structure. The tall buildings have
got their faade painted in different colors, an effort to better distinguish
between them. Still the area seems anonymous and clearly shapes the function
rather than the identity.
Sunlight: The parking spaces next to the tall buildings receive plenty of light,
and the green recreational corridor south of the towers as well.
Position in relation to the street: Buildings placed away from the street. A large
parking space in the front of the buildings
Wind condition: The areas around the tall buildings a highly exposed to wind,
even on not particularly windy days.
Summary:
Despite the blend of typologies and an effort to paint the faades in different colors, a strong repetitive structure in the large area becomes monotonous. The area seems to follow to a great extent
the modernistic system of dividing living recreation, transportation and work. Almost only residential
from the street with parking lots in between and no connection between the streets and the ground
109
Lundtoftegade (45m;1965-1970)
Concise summary of aspects
FAR: Medium
Relation to other buildings: Semi relatable
Free outdoor spaces: Average
Lower floors relation to street level: Closed
Function (monotony): Function
Position of building relation to the street: partially away
Visibility: Medium
Sunlight: Average
Traffic: Car and bike
Faade: Simple
Wind: fairly windy
DRAWING A
Above 8 floors
3-8 floors
1-2 floors
Parking area
DRAWING INFORMATION
A DRAWING:
B DRAWING:
Scale:
Plan
Sektion
1:2000
No: 7 and 8
NORTH
DRAWING B
110
Description:
settlement for the modern family in 1970. Large bright apartments with sun receiving balconies, tall
buildings with views as far as the eye could see, low rises with retirement homes, institutions between
the tall buildings, located in attractive town with a small stream as its nearest neighbor.
But hardly had the residents moved in before the stream next door was laid in pipes, and a semi high-
FAR: 180%
Relation to other buildings: The tall buildings are embedded by block structures
that dominates the area context south and east of the area. There is another tall
building though, the TDC tower, nearby. It can seem like a prolongation of the 4 tall buildings.
Free outdoor spaces: Semi public spaces in-between the buildings with different
activities. Few people seen using them though, on a sunny summer afternoon in June.
Lower floors relation to street level: The meeting with the ground is without any
public function and seems anonymous.
Sunlight: The buildings are placed to each other to allow a maximum of light in
fall. A lot of open areas with high sun intake is also available.
Position in relation to the street: The tall buildings stand and face away from
the street. Lower, 6 floors buildings, follow the street grid and embed the street
scape, and connect the buildings to street.
Traffic. The Car seems to dominate the area with large parking in between the
buildings, even though not at the extent seen in other projects, and with a 6
lanes motor road going right next to the buildings in a 1 floor height.
Facades: Facades with little detail, a monotonous expression with some trans
parency.
Wind condition: The dense urban fabric seems to reduce the dominance of the
wind compared to more open tall building areas.
Summary:
Lundtoftegade is a tall building area with 4 proportionnaly wide tall buildings and smaller blocks
following the street. It is placed in a central and dense urban context. The open spaces have resemblance to courtyards found in block structures in Copenhagen, without being enclosed completely.
Despite of this the relation to the CIAM tall buildings is evident. The tall buildings are meeting the
ground away from the street and do not contain any transparence or open function at ground level.
wide proportions of the tall buildings, all point toward a CIAM inspiration.
111
DRAWING A
DRAWING INFORMATION
A DRAWING:
B DRAWING:
Scale: 1:2000
Plan
Section
No: 7 and 8
Above 8 floors
3-8 floors
1-2 floors
Parking area
NORTH
DRAWING B
112
Description:
The 3 tall buildings were like many tall building project at the time, seen as a modern and futuristic
way of living. The project was a vision of the city inside a building complex. Many functions were
planned to be inside the tall building complex, such as a posthouse, groceries stores and other common functions, as laundry rooms etc. It consists of 3 tall buildings connected together through a one
to inner Copenhagen through it.
FAR: 130%
Relation to other buildings: The 3 tall slim but long buildings clearly stand out in a
predominately single house as well as low building block area. The plot is narrow, set
between rail road and street, hence the tall buildings seem squished inside a low building
area creating a momentous scale gap from the tall buildings to its context of low buildings.
Free outdoor spaces: Parking dominates the outdoor spaces in front of the tall buildings,
with pockets of playground and recreation.
the local residence as well as public functions as post house give an open impression
of the building complex from the ground.
Monotonies(function): The tall buildings stand out in the urban context of single family
houses or row houses, but the buildings themselves are monotonous. Intended to be
apartments without kitchen and having all common facilities inside the building complex.
scape around them. The repetitive structure lessens the landmark effect up close.
Sunlight: The tall buildings have good light in fall, but some areas in between them are
often affected by the shadows they create.
Position in relation to the street. Set away from the street with a strip of parking lots in
between the buildings and the street.
Faade: The facades are currently undergoing a renovation. It had until now a plain
repetitive faade and that do not seem to change, according to the drawings put
up at the site. The different functions form some variation and transparence at the ground facade.
Wind condition: The tall scale gap from the tall buildings to the rest seems to create
significant wind turbulence at the bottom of the buildings.
Summary:
Sorgenfrivang seems to be built on purely economical basis with disregard to its surroundings. No
harmony or connection between the tall building plot and the other building areas. Despite public
functions, the functions in the buildings seem mostly addressed to the citizens of Sorgenfrivang rather
than people from exterior.
The long proportions of the tall buildings, the position in relation to the street as well as the monotonous facades gives the area resemblance to modernistic planning ideas as the CIAM movement.
113
DRAWING INFORMATION
A DRAWING:
B DRAWING:
Scale: 1:4000
Plan
Section
No: 9 and 10
DRAWING A
Above 8 floors
3-8 floors
1-2 floors
Parking area
NORTH
DRAWING B
114
FAR: 225%
Relation to other buildings: based on its height (102m) it is far out of reach for the surrounding
buildings. No real coherence with any other structure but a cluster of tall buildings is
nearby, NAME.
Free outdoor spaces. Few recreational options as parking lots dominates the area. An
skate arena have been integrated into the parking lot.
are situated at the lower block in connection to the tall building. The tall building meets
the ground inside the center, where a public interior square is.
Function (Monotony): Being a radical tall element the building gives an identity to the
area. Additionally the building shapes the function of the area with a shopping center
and providing a large number of apartments for the common public.
Visibility: Laying behind at the bottom of a hill, its impact on the skyline seems lessen.
But because of its height of 102m it is one of the most visible buildings south west of the
city center. Up close the building seems as a massive plain element that do not give
much back to its context.
Sunlight: The tall massive building creates a big shadow, but mainly on the parking lot.
Position in relation to the street: The tall building is set back from a big lower base building.
Large parking space is in-between the building and the street.
Wind condition: Turbulent wind condition at the street level on both sides.
Summary:
Domus Vista does not seem to scream for attention despite being a single standing above 100 meter
tall building. The wide proportions of the building do not appears to strive for height and its location
behind Valby Bakke away from the city center gives it a more discrete impact on the citys skyline. It
has a plain faade and it is encircled by anonymous parking lots. The residential tall building does not
seem to open up towards its context and meet the ground with an interior square, in a semi private
space inside the lower base building.
115
DRAWING INFORMATION
Wind: windy
No: 11 and 12
A DRAWING:
B DRAWING:
Scale: 1:2000
Plan
Section
DRAWING A
Above 8 floors
3-8 floors
1-2 floors
Parking area
NORTH
116
DRAWING B
Description:
the tallest building of Rigshospitalet are built in 1970 under a renovation of the original buildings from
the 19th century. A new plan has been made to demolish some of the oldest building in the area
the existing national hospital area, and do not change the tallest buildings, as the central complex.
FAR: 174%
Relation to other buildings: The whole area stands by itself and do have little
relation to the surroundings, but the tall building of Riget, is countered by the new
Panum tower to the west in height and Parken Stadium to the east in
massivness.
Lower floors relation to street level: Few efforts have been made into integrating
the buildings lower floors outward to the public.
Function: The tall building complex shapes an identity for the whole hospital
area outwards. The recent addition of a helicopter pad reinforces that image,
as well as the function is made more visible.
Visibility: The tallest building of Riget is one of the most prominent features of
the Copenhagen skyline, especially because of its large width. Up close it
seems hidden away and do not function as a landmark as from far away.
Sunlight: The sunlight receiving areas seem sparse near the tall building, but the
neighboring park contain a lot New plan greatly increase the public space
around the building and will create a square with the most intake of sunlight.
Position in relation to the street: The buildings stand away from the main streets
with the tallest, furthest away.
Traffic: major traffic roads go nearby the hospital area. The car seemed to be a
main form of transportation despite the central location.
Wind condition: Wind turbulence occurs frequently in the area. The courtyard
area next to the tallest building seems to some extent protected from the wind.
117
Summary:
Rigshospitalet is unique for its combination of
proportionally wide tall building placed centrally in the city; this makes it one of the most visible
features in the Copenhagen skyline. The building area is surrounded by parks but the green
landscape is mostly left out of the space in between the buildings. The large building blocks,
the plain facades, the proportion, the meeting
with the ground and the position away from the
streets have much resemblance to the modernistic tall buildings.
118
DRAWING INFORMATION
A DRAWING:
B DRAWING:
Scale: 1:2000
Wind: windy
Plan
Section
No: 13 and 14
DRAWING A
Above 8 floors
3-8 floors
1-2 floors
Parking area
NORTH
DRAWING B
119
Description:
Built in 1973, 86m high. It was built on a former military ground. A lot of protest met the project,
because of the height and location, but the municipality insisted since the city needed more hotel
capacity (Rasmussen, 1994).
hoods, Christianshavn, islands Brygge and Amagerbro, without being part of neither one of them. It
has a huge visibility in Copenhagen as it stands alone with no interaction at all with other buildings.
It is placed away from the street in the middle of the plot, with parking lots all around it.
Free outdoor spaces : Parking spaces dominate the open space between the
street and the building.
Lower floors relation to street level: The lower base building consist of public
functions, casino and fitness ect. Monotonies: erupting in the monotony of 4-5
floors Karrebebyggelse that exist in the other neighborhoods.
Sunlight: A lot of sunlight into the parking lots south of the tall building.
Visibility(far vs. local): A big visible structure from the inner city as well as most
of amager. It works as aiming point on the road from Rdhuspladsen and other
major roads. When youre close to it, it is not that relevant, have to bend you
neck to see it.
Position in relation to the street: placed away from the street with a set back
on lower base building.
Faade: Light faade on the top building, with slim vertical windows. Dark/
heavy base building.
Wind condition: Wind turbulence seem to occur frequently even in day without
much wind.
Summary:
ter and a 6 lane road it is a highly visible element of the city. But it has no relation to other buildings
in its context; it seems to be screaming out in the void, look at me. The slim form and the vertical
faade seems to emphasize the buildings strive for height. The building is away from the street and
set back on a lower base building that has public functions but seems; however its public functions
and facades are not transparent and do seem uninviting. The open space around the buildings seem
unpleasant with a dominating windblown parking lot and no places for stay.
120
DRAWING INFORMATION
A DRAWING:
B DRAWING:
Scale: 1:2000
Plan
Section
No: 15 and 16
DRAWING A
Above 8 floors
3-8 floors
1-2 floors
Parking area
NORTH
121
DRAWING B
Local plan:
Panum is created through an architectural competition. This has according to the plan ensured a
broad grounding and consensus of the plans architectural qualities. The ambition of this plan is to
make a landmark not only for the neighborhood but the science research globally. Optimal integration to the surrounding areas was highly prioritized in the architectural demands for the plan. The
building shall consist of material as such it does not take the attention away from Sankt Johannes
church which should still appear tallest seen from Sankt Hans square. Free space in the area should
be minimum 15 % of the ground area, and it should invite for stay and recreational activity. (local
plan, Panum)
FAR: 210%
Lower floors relation to street level: Public spaces will be formed by the building
that aims for transparence.
Visibility(far vs. local):. Locally it relates to the existing Panum building and the church
Sankt Hans. It will be an iconic building on Nrrebro and the rest of the city with a huge visibility.
Sunlight: The slimness of the tower prevents wide shadowing. It is also estimated
that the shadow of the tall building mainly will be on the existing Panum building,
thus not disturbing any key recreational areas.
Position in relation to the street. Away from the street, with branches of the
lower building going out to the street.
Traffic: close to major roads, but in a dense area in central Copenhagen, with
a new bike lane going by, the bike seems to be the prioritized as transport form.
Summary:
This single standing tower aims to be a landmark for the city of Copenhagen. It has great potential
with efforts to interact with the public life in this central location. It will have a new bike path through
the building. In addition the building pays attention to its impact in the context, as scaled to relate
well and not dominate Sankt Hans Church from the square Sankt Hans.
122
DRAWING INFORMATION
No. 17 and 18
A DRAWING:
B DRAWING:
Scale:
DRAWING A
Plan
Sektion
1:4000
Above 8 floors
3-8 floors
1-2 floors
Parking area
NORTH
DRAWING B
123
Description:
Turning Torso is the single most noticeable element in the region. It has, as Koolhaus requests, a sensational wow effect to it, partially because no buildings near this height existed or exist in the region
and because of the buildings structure as the name indicates, imitates the movement of a human
torso turning around. It is visible placed in Malm Vstra Hamnen area near the coast, across the sea
towards Copenhagen. Built in the era of competition for attention in between cities, Malm sought to
brand itself through a tall building, a skyscraper of 190 meters in. Originally a similar skyscraper was
planned in Copenhagen but the city decided against it.
Relation to other buildings: The building do seem to relate more to the sky than
the other buildings in the area that consist of lower building of 4- 6 floors. No
connection seems to be made.
Free outdoor spaces: Recreational areas exist in the area, as along a canal
close by, though not relating to the building.
Lower floors relation to street level: Private and not inviting. Small water pond
around, seems almost to function like a small fortification.
Function (Monotony): The building clearly shapes the identity of the area
Sunlight: The tall building stands alone in casting shadows. It is rather slim which
reduces the shadow.
Visibility: The tallest building in the region, placed at the coastline. The single
most visible building. Intended to be a symbol of a lighthouse.
Position in relation to the street: Set back from the street and not relating.
Faade: It has a characteristic white faade turning around into the sky.
Wind condition: wind turbulence does seem to occur more frequently near the
bottom of the building.
Summary:
An icon; this single standing tower strives for
height and admiration. It is placed strategicalpact of the citys expression outwards. From the
ground level it is surrounded by water and has
no public life or approachability , thus Turning
Torso seems to be Turning away from its local
context, and rather seeking fame in the globalized world.
124
DRAWING INFORMATION
A DRAWING:
B DRAWING:
Scale: 1:2000
Plan
Section
No: 19 and 20
Above 8 floors
3-8 floors
1-2 floors
Parking area
DRAWING A
NORTH
DRAWING B
125
Local plan:
The purpose of the plan is the construction and de-
Description:
ers are leaning away from each other from the same
Relation to other buildings: It responds to the tall buildings at the same height in
restad City 1 km south from it. Not any other relation in the area; the area is planned
to be developed in the future.
Free outdoor spaces: The free spaces are dominated by parking lots.
Lower floors relation to street level: Lower base building forming the base of the 2 towers,
containing a reception that do not seem transparent from outside.
Monotonies: standing out as an iconic building, forming the identity of the area.
Visibility(far vs. local): great visibility in most of amager and from some parts of the city
center too
Sunlight: The shadows are towards the large scale parking lot, where there is still plenty
of sun receiving parking areas.
Position in relation to the street: the two tall buildings form a portal and are street
bound, as a street is going through the building complex;. Parking lots encircle the rest
of the building complex from the main streets.
Traffic: Proximity to metro, but the oversized parking lots make it seem built for the car.
Summary:
from all over Copenhagen with a different expression from each angle. It does not contribute much to its local
context though. The fancy faade seems to enclose it instead of opening it up. The meeting with the ground
is not contributing to the large scaled parking lots.
126
DRAWING INFORMATION
Wind: Windy
No: 21 and 22
A DRAWING:
B DRAWING:
Scale: 1:2000
Plan
Section
DRAWING A
Above 8 floors
3-8 floors
1-2 floors
Parking area
NORTH
DRAWING B
127
Floor ratio area: 150% about the same as in a karrebebyggelse of 4-5 floors.
Relation to other buildings: Street bound the building becomes part of an unity
in the city. The Panoptikon building next to the Sas building, a 12 floor bears
some resemblance in facade with the SAS hotel. The ongoing construction of
Axel Towers will create a new relationship as well.
Free outdoor spaces: The backyard of the building is mainly used for parking. Located In
dense urban context, not a lot of open spaces. Axel square is nearby, and lively sidewalks.
Lower floors relation to street level: Function as a Hotel with public functions as
restaurants and other.
Visibility (far vs. local): Clearly visible as an iconic building in the city center. It has local
connection with buildings with the same expression.( see plan no. 12). At a regional
scale it is situated near the main train station and it is thereby connected beyond the capital.
Sunlight: The slimness limits the shadow of the building to be mainly in the backyard
parking area.
Position in relation to the street: The tall building is set back from the street with
a lower block of two floors following the street grid.
Faade: Tall building is floating on top of the darker lower base. The faade
seems light and elegant.
Wind condition: Wind turbulence can occur more frequently at the area despite
a dense urban context.
Summary:
This is clearly an inspiration from the American in this tall building. The SAS hotel has with its slim proportion, location and elegant faade have certain characteristics from American tall buildings. The
setback of the tall building make it seem less intimidating on the street and more in harmony with the
128
FAR: High
Relation to other buildings: Semi relatable
Free outdoor spaces: Average
Lower floors relation to street level: Semi Closed
Function (monotony): Identity
Position of building relation to the street: Streetbound
Visibility: Medium
Sunlight: Average
Traffic: Bike
Faade: Characteristic
DRAWING INFORMATION
Wind: Windy
No: 23 and 24
A DRAWING:
B DRAWING:
Scale: 1:4000
Plan
Section
DRAWING A
Above 8 floors
3-8 floors
1-2 floors
Parking area
NORTH
DRAWING B
Local plan:
The plan emphasizes a mixed use of urban areas of high architectonic quality that takes advantage
of the attractive location near the harbor front. Old warehouse must be preserved and can be ex-
129
A tall building of 60 m can be built if architectural reasoned. Another tall building, 45m high, can
be in respect with the dimensions and height assessed in the other tall building so as to achieve an
acceptable skyline of this part of the town. The two tall buildings should express coherence with each
other and can be given a faade material and colors to highlights this.
Description:
In the beginning of the 00s this area was renewed, at the old harbor where the big ships left to
cross the Atlantic ocean, hence the name American Square. The area is 500 meter in length. It was
planned to contain at least one icon building and this became Kobbertrnet, 62 m. After it was built
another tall building was planned at the other end of development area to counter the existing tall
tall building has been approved and is planned to be next to Kobbertrnet on the last empty plot in
the area. The planning of this area near the harbor can be seen in the light of the globalized competition between cities, as a way of attracting businesses and attractive apartments. A means of showing
the world that the city is successful. A lot of the historic buildings in the area have been preserved and
integrated into new functions.
FAR: 235%
Relation to other buildings: Some old warehouse has been transformed. The two tall buildings relate
in height to each other and form a contrast between high and low. Other tall buildings near the
harbor are relatable but the area seems to connect best with itself.
Free outdoor spaces: Outdoor spaces have been created, but not much life observed, even with the
high FAR.
Lower floors relation to street level: Plesner seems closed off with little transparency. Fyrtrnet adding
recreation and more transparency to the area, through an elevated open courtyard area.
Monotonies: The two taller buildings stand out in height compared to the rest of the warehouse
buildings, shaping the identity of the area.
Visibility(far vs. local): Seen as iconic building close to the harbor front, and it has wide ranging con
nection with the Oslo Ferry. But Amerika plads seems like an island in the ocean, cut off from the rest
of the city by train rails. Visually the two tall buildings connect outside of the area. Inside the area it
feels like a cohesive structure of building that relate to each other.
Sunlight: The dense urban setting cannot prevent shadowing to occur, but efforts made to let a lot
of sun into public key spots
Position in relation to the street: Plesner, the tallest building has a setback on a low building. They
are both away from the street, with Fyrtrnet adding recreation and transparence to the area,
through an elevated open courtyard area.
Faade: Plesner have a Heavy expression. Fyrtrnet is lighter, with a particular balcony pattern and
roof terraces.
Wind condition: A windy area close to the harbor, though the dense urban setting shelter some wind off.
Summary:
other in height and position across the plot. Ideas from Eesteren can be seen in the area with a contrast between high and low as well as between old and new. The tall buildings shape the identity of the
130
DRAWING INFORMATION
A DRAWING:
B DRAWING:
Scale: 1:4000
Plan
Section
No: 25 and 26
Wind: Windy
DRAWING A
Above 8 floors
3-8 floors
1-2 floors
Parking area
DRAWING B
NORTH
131
Description:
area is 130%. Located just next to a new and the biggest beach in the capital area, this area is developed to create attractive apartments with a sea view close to the city center. The area is built in
the era of city competition, with the intention of attracting good taxpaying citizens.
Floor ratio area: 125% total area, with variations from 15-200% on each building
plot.
Lower floors relation to street level: A lot scale shifts, from 2 floors till 5 and up
till the tall building, gives a different streetscape, with a human scale around
the tall building.
Visibility: The cluster of tall buildings forms a landmark on the east coast of Copenhagen.
Independently each tall building can also function as a landmark in a
small scale with different materials and expression.
Sunlight: buildings placed as to let the most sunlight in to the areas. The slimness
of the towers do as little shadowing as possible on key public areas.
Position in relation to the street. Away from streets with smaller blocks going all
the way out, making them less intimidating.
Parking lots often hidden underground.
Wind condition. Wind turbulence can occur more frequently near especially
near the squared tallest building, close to the metro.
Summary:
librium. An effort to get different scales mixed in a harmonious rhythm between lower and higher
buildings. The area has a lot of small open spaces and blocks. Each tall building has its own expreschange as the projects matures. The attraction of amager strandpark is close by and it seems to suck
a lot of life out of the area; thus not much life around the buildings. Some tall buildings have public
function at ground level, other a carefully scaled down with lower buildings in same materials extended from the tall building (see photo). A way to integrate the tall building with a smaller scale building
and making it seems less intimidating. There has been established semi private courtyards and material that traditionally have been use in Danish construction. Towards the neighboring residential areas
tween the buildings on Krimsvej, the building scale often feels humane and many of the tall buildings
do not feel oppressing on the landscape next to them. A group of slim towers.
132
DRAWING INFORMATION
No: 27 and 28
A DRAWING:
B DRAWING:
Scale: 1:4000
Plan
Section
DRAWING A
Above 8 floors
3-8 floors
1-2 floors
Parking area
NORTH
DRAWING B
133
FAR: 125%
Relation to other buildings: The three sisters(the towers) forms together a clus
ter of tall buildings. At the moment the three and another have a height that
relate to each other. Old Nokken lies south of the area and seem to be in
another scale completely as do the smaller row houses build in the area. Across
the harbor lies big H.C.rsted plant and is in a completely different expression.
Free outdoor spaces: The outdoor spaces are compressed in-between the tall
buildings. But still to see the finalization of the lagoon a recreation area in the
making. Large recreational area close by, amager naturpark.
Lower floors relation to street level: Private space at the bottom floor of the
buildings, with a margin of bushes set the premise that outsiders are not invited
near the tall buildings.
Visibility: Icons of the southern parth of Copenhagen harbor. Visible from Amag
er naturepark and the southern part of the harbor.
Sunlight: Poor sun intake in between the 3 tall buildings and their park.
Position in relation to the street: The buildings are placed away from the street
and placed into small greenery that glues them together, facing away from the
street.
Traffic: Proximity to major infrastructure roads, the car seems prioritized as well
as the bike with bike lanes.
Faade: Rather heavy facades, but with a characteristic round shaped buildings
and fancy balconies.
Wind condition: The tall buildings are shaped round, aerodynamically, which to
some extent could reduce the wind turbulence normally created by tall buildings.
Summary:
ings are rather massive in proportions and do not seem to be connecting with the lower small scaled
buildings. The tall buildings are placed in an open landscape encircled by smaller buildings; it all
seems to point inwards, rather uninviting. Walking around in snorkeling paths between the buildings
enhanced, all monofunctional. The lack of transparence in the area can be excused or explained
by the fact that the huge recreational wonderland amager naturepark lies just next to it; and/or that
the area is a more expensive residential part of Copenhagen and simply seeks exclusivity rather than
inclusivity.
134
DRAWING INFORMATION
Wind: Windy
No: 29 and 30
A DRAWING:
B DRAWING:
Scale: 1:4000
Plan
Section
DRAWING A
Above 8 floors
3-8 floors
1-2 floors
Parking area
NORTH
DRAWING B
135
Local plan:
The area should be an attractive and diverse place with wide range of activities for the public and
buildings of high aesthetic value. 6 tall buildings are allowed to be built near the highway. The areas
prominent character should be emphasized by distinctive building complexes in the form of tall buildings. The tall buildings act as structuring components of the area itself. The tall buildings should not be
lower than 75m high and not higher than 85 m due to airport restrictions.
Description: It consists of large building blocks with slimmer tall buildings. The vision of this place was
that 6 tall buildings of similar height should stand next to the highway forming a portal to Copenhagen
from the resunds bridge. The portal vision seems part of a city competition to attract attention seeking investors and growth to the city. Today only 3 high-rises have been completed at that spot, and
Relation to other buildings: Single family house area bordering the site on one
side, the other completely open green area. The houses scale down towards
the single houses to 4 floors and go up till 80 meters high
Free outdoor spaces: A large park area is available as well as smaller squares in
front of the tall buildings and more intimate spaces along a canal.
activities or transparence to the street level. The area seems privatized and not inviting.
Position in relation to the street: Mostly street bound or forming smaller squares
in front of them. Scaling down toward the streets except towards the highway.
The plan of the area has been to create and portal of tall buildings next to the highway.
Wind condition: Seems very windy with the wide open area west of the area
and no shelter or intimate spaces to counter the strong western winds.
Summary:
Scale and strong winds seems to be problematic in this area. This group of slim tall buildings lifts the
or contribute to an urban life in the area though. The effort by building smaller buildings next to the
tall buildings can help the scale from some angles but the wind turbulences in restad is still strong
because of wide gap between the buildings. This place has no protection against the western wind
coming over the vast Amager naturepark and with a giant closed mall as neighbor; the urban life on
the sidewalks is vacuumed inside.
136
Interview:
Interviews conducted by the author of the thesis.
Justensen, Rita (Head of planning and architecture in By&Havn). Interview. 29 May 2015 (Recorded on audiotape)
Andersen, Ivan Kjr (Manager at maintenance in Hje Gladsaxe). Interview. 14 June 2015 (Recorded on
audiotape)
137
Model pictures
138