Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Quiz
D e t e r m i n e t h e o b s e r v a b i li t y
f o r t h e f o l lo w i n g s y s t e m
2
x& = 0
0
y = [1
0
2
0 x
3
1
1 1] x
0
Duality properties
Symmetry properties exists
Observability (Reconstructability)
Controllability (Reachability)
The Linear time-invariant system
x = Ax + Bu
y = Cx
is the dual of the system (and vice versa)
z = A1z + B1v
y * = C1x*
where A1 = AT ,B1 = CT ,C1 = BT
*
* *
*
* n1
OM = C C A C ( A )
*
* *
*
* n1
Rank( C C A C ( A ) ) = n
1 v n
Pole Placement
Pole placement
All poles are placed at the desired location
Also known as Pole assignment
All states should be measureable and available for feedback
CSC implies pole placement
Root locus
Similar to pole placement approach as for as placing of poles is
concerned
Only dominant closed loop poles are at the desired location
Let
s1 = 1 ,s 2 = 2 , L s n = n
be the desired poles. So by choosing a proper gain matrix for state feedback, it is
possible to force the system to have closed loop poles at the desired location, Provided
the system is completely state controllable.
Given
x& = Ax + Bu
y = Cx + Du
where
x n : State vector;
y m : Measurement/output vector;
(
( B
( D
1 n
D m p
11
A nn ;
Let's choose control signal as u ( t ) = Kx ( t ) . This shows that u is determined by the instanteneous values
state. This scheme is referred to as state feedback control and the matrix K pn is called feedback gain.
For single input system, its dimensions are 1 n.
8
for x ( 0 ) 0, then
x ( 0 ) : initial conditions
A12
B11
1
=
=
;
B
P
B
, Also define K=KP=
[ K1 M K 2 ] , Then we have
A 22
0
+ BK
sI A + BK = P 1 ( sI A + BK ) P = sI P 1AP + P 1BKP = sI A
11
+ BK
=0
sI A + BK = P 1 ( sI A + BK ) P = sI P 1AP + P 1BKP = sI A
A11 B11K1
= sI
0
A11 + B11K1
sI n q A 22
=0
Iq : q q identity matrix
where
I n q : n q n q identity matrix
Note that eig(A22 ) does not depend on state feedback gain K. It means
it cannot be placed by any K. In other words all the states of the
system can not be controlled by K.
Conclusion: Complete state controllability is necessary conditions for computing
K in order to place the eigenvalues at the desired location.
12
canonical form.
Define
T = MW ,
where
M= B M AB M LM An 1 B ,
an 1
a
n2
W = M
a1
1
an 2 L a1
an 3 L 1
M
1
M
0
M
0
13
0
0
A = T AT = M
0
Control System Design-II by Dr. A.Q. Khan an
1
0
M
0
an 1
0
0
0
1 L 0
M
M
M ;B = M
0 0 1
0
1
L a2 a1
0
1
0
M,
0
0
form (CCF).
The state feedback controller can be designed if a system can
be transferable to into CCF.
Let 1 , 2 ,L n be the desired poles; that is
( s 1 )( s 2 )L ( s n ) = s n + 1s n1 L + n1s + n = 0
with K=KT=
14
L n ] T 1
Stablizabe Systems:
Uncontrollable mode>>>>>> stable
In that particular case, state feedback controller can only be
designed controllable mode.
15