Professional Documents
Culture Documents
FoundationAnalysisandDesign
A mat is continuous in
two directions capable
of supporting multiple
columns, wall or floor
loads. It has dimensions
from 20 to 80 ft or more
for houses and hundreds
of feet for large
structures such as multistory hospitals and some
warehouses
Ribbed mats, consisting
of stiffening beams
placed below a flat slab
are useful in unstable
soils such as expansive,
collapsible or soft
materials where
differential movements
can be significant
(exceeding 0.5 inch).
This image cannot currently be display ed.
o Floating Foundations
o Coefficient of Subgrade Reaction
o Loads and Moments on Combined
Footings
o Design of Mats
MatFoundations
Structural loads
require large area to
spread the load
Soil is erratic and
prone to differential
settlements
Structural loads are
erratic
Unevenly distributed
lateral loads
Uplift loads are larger
than spread footings
can accommodate;
weight of the mat is
a factor here
Mat foundations are
easier to waterproof
Mat
foundation is 3
metres thick
and bottomed
at 19.2 m
below street
level
Example:
Chase Tower,
Houston, TX
ConditionsforMat
Foundations
FloatingFoundations
Buoyancy
Method
FloatingFoundations
BasicsofBuoyancyMethod
o Foundation as Shown
o Foundation is 50 m long
and 70 m wide
o Sum of column and wall
loads = 805 MN
Given
Find
FloatingFoundation
Example
A = (50)(70) = 3500 m2
Compute area of
foundation
Wf = (23.6)(50)(70)(1.8) = 148.68
MN
Compute pressure of
structure on foundation
Compute weight of
bottom of mat
Ws = (19)(50)(70)(8.7) = 578.55
MN
Compute change in
pressure on foundation
Compute displacement
on pressure basis (same
as total stress on base of
foundation)
FloatingFoundation
Example
The deformation
characteristics of the soil
are quantified in the
coefficient of subgrade
reaction, or subgrade
modulus, which is similar to
the modulus of elasticity for
unidirectional deformation
q = bearing pressure
= settlement
z
ks = coefficient of subgrade
reaction, units of force/length3
(the units are the same as the
unit weight, but not the
significance!)
z
q
ks =
Definition of
Coefficient of
Subgrade Reaction
CoefficientofSubgrade
Reaction
If using a pseudo-coupled
value, use values of ks in
the centre of the mat
which are half those along
the perimeter
This methodology has the
potential of eliminating the
problems described earlier
while at the same time
yielding values of ks which
then can be used in a
structural analysis of the
mat with some degree of
confidence
Methods used to
determine coefficient
Derived relationships
between ks and Es
Methods used to
determine coefficient
DeterminingtheCoefficient
ofSubgradeReaction
Common method of
estimating the
coefficient of subgrade
reaction
Load is applied to plate
using reaction system
Described in some
detail in Murthy 13.2
Results in a loadsettlement curve of the
plate
PlateLoadTest
CoefficientofSubgrade
Reaction
Time
DifficultiesinDeterminingthe
CoefficientofSubgrade Reaction
2k1 L + 0.5
(US Units, L in feet)
3 L
k s1 =
2k1
k s1 =
3
2k1 L + 0.152
(SI Units, L in meters)
3
L
k s1 =
UsingCoefficientofSubgrade
Reaction(Murthy14.4)
Determine actual
coefficient of subgrade
reaction ks from ks1
Sands
2
3k s1
ks =
B
o Clays
B + 1
(US Units, L in feet)
k s = k s1
2B
B + 0.3
(SI Units, L in meters)
k s = k s1
2B
Scale Factors
UsingCoefficientofSubgrade
Reaction(Murthy14.4)
Foundation is rigid
relative to soil
Find
Structure to be supported on a
30 m wide by 50 m long mat
foundation
Given
ks =
Substituting B = 30 m, ks = 11.5
MN/m3
B + 0.30
k s = k sl
2 B
Solution
q
120 kPa
=
=
= 10 . 4 mm
3
k s 11500 kN / m
ExampleofUsingCoefficientof
SubgradeReaction
ProblemswiththeCoefficientof
SubgradeReaction
Application of
coefficient of subgrade
reaction to larger mats
z
P + W f u D = qdA = k s dA
CoefficientofSubgrade
Reaction
Strength
z
Evaluate these requirements
using factored loads and
LRFD design methods
z
Mat must have sufficient
thickness T and reinforcement
to safety resist these loads
z
T should be large enough so
that no shear reinforcement is
required
Serviceability
z
Evaluate using unfactored
loads for excessive
deformation at places of
concentrated loads, such as
columns, soil non-uniformities,
mat non-uniformities, etc.
z
This is the equivalent of a
differential settlement analysis
z
Mat must be made thicker if
this is a problem
Example: Murthy, Ex. 14.4
StructuralDesignofCombined
FootingsandMats
Methods
z Coupled Method
z Pseudo-Coupled
Method
z Multiple-Parameter
Method
z Finite Element
Method
z Winkler
Nonrigid methods
consider the
deformation of the
mat and their
influence of bearing
pressure distribution.
These methods
produce more
accurate values of
mat deformations and
stresses
These methods are
more difficult to
implement than rigid
methods because of
soil-structure
interaction
NonrigidMethods
WinklerMethods
Actual data show that such a matsoil interaction will deflect in the
centre more than the edges
This is one reason why we use other
methods (such as Schmertmann's or
Houghs) to determine settlement
LimitationsofWinkler
Method
CoupledMethod
MultipleParameter
Method
FiniteElementMethod
Bearing capacity
Total settlement
OtherConsiderationsin
MatFoundations
Questions