Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Pollalis
Case Studies on
Management and
Technology in the
Design Process
with
Alberto Diaz-Hermidas
Jan Fischer
Elizabeth Gould
Thom Kurmel
Thom McQuilien
Caroline Otto
Suzanne Thompson
Jane Wernick
Bouwkunde TU - Delft
I
lil
lIiI 111
I I
University
University of Technology
(31-15) 78 41 59
fax (31-15) 7831 71
© 1993 N.
the last two years, our has worked closely with S.N.
of to C'T-r~·nCT·Tt"I""n international presence. This book,
of
,,"" ..... "" ......... A.h at is a result of this
very successful vV'JI-".,A.U"A.VJlA..
Architecture
tomy
work in this
1987. The cases have been
Harvard have Av,n",,,,,,cc':'rI
as of my 1"A<:lf"'t\'11"Il'r
Harvard
" " " •• .LJ-, ....... "" the relationships between technology, organization structure, and
..... "" .... UH.'U'.L.L in architectural, engineering and construction firms.
J.J.J.U.J.'U.J..LE,
Over a years, I had fruitful discussions on the case studies method and
how it is on and history, with Prof. Seiler
Prof. Ted Happold of Bath University, of
Howard Burns of I would like also to express my
appreciation to the many contributors to the cases who provided material,
researched, and documented these cases. Furthermore, I would like to thank my
student Alberto Diaz-Hermidas, who developed case studies 5 and 6, as part of his
doctoral dissertation on the lnfluence of Delivery Methods on Architectural
Projects: Case Studies from the Seville Expo'92, and who me in the
preparation of the graphics in the as my former Thom
Kurmel, who case 4, as of his 1""1"'.. 1""'......
List of
PART I
THE
THE
1.1
1.2 Planning the New England Medical
1.3 Historyof
1.4
1.5
1.6
1.7
1.8
1.9
2.3.6 Gantt
2.3.7 Accounts
2.3.8 Quantified Bar Chart
2.4 The Meeting Frost. .................................................................... 42
ALPHA AND
3.1
3.2
3.3
3.7
3.8
PART 11
DUR/NG
4.2.8
4.2.10
4.3 Construction
1
.2
4.3.3
4.3.4
THE
............ 84
5.2 86
Design
5.4 Bidding
5.5 Construction ................................................................................................. 99
5.5.1 Earth 99
5.5.2 Foundations ................................................................................. 100
5 walis ............................................................................. 101
5.5.4 Exterior walIs .............................................................................. .
Interior Structure ......................................................................... 104
5.5.6
5.5.7
5.5.8 finishes ............................................................................. 111
Stnlcture ......................................................................... 113
6.3
6.4
6.4.1
PART 111
EVALUATING EX/ST/NG
PART IV
RENOVATIONS
10.3
PART V
AND
.................................................................................... 275
TABLE OF ........................................................................................................280
PART I
THE
THE
1.1.
1
1.4.
1.7.
Fig. 1 A CfCIss-sel;llOill
schematically) .
1.15. Transformation of a funicular truss into an arch
Schodek, 22
1.16. Arches and Schodek, 1980) .................................. 23
supports of the bridging structure ...................................... 24
The proposed "Mega-Truss" stluctural 0V.l.UU'VJ."
THE .................................................................................................. 27
2.1. The chart for Café Voltaire project on a
scale, as originally r\I<}-n-n~~rI ................................................. 34
The node arrow n"'TnT,r~n
2.3. The Network
Gantt chart the tasks as planned and as
executed ........................................................................................ .
two dimensions ..................... .41
the Café Voltail'e project,
42
ALPHA AND FACIUTY ............ 43
3.1. The ......................................................................................... 45
3.2. Elevation the slope of the ................................... 50
3.3. The schematic of the ...................................... 51
The grid the location ofthe
is shown ....................................... 52
3.5. 3
3.6. Alternative cross-sections of the .................................... 53
3.7. main trusses .......................... 5 4
nr~(,lt1icr of the
building ........................................................................................... 55
3.9. Alternative configurations of wind for the
exterior walls. 6
3.10. of wind bracing for the building's
roof (plan shown) .......................................................................... 56
PART 11
CHANGES DURING
PAVILION ..................................................................................... 83
Plan and (Cruzcampo Pavilion:
Pavilion ofThe 73) ............................................... 85
Model of the Cruzcampo pavilion presented
,,,,n,,,,,~-nn,,"r 1989 ...................................................................................... 87
Beer plant schematic .... '-'u.... ""J. .•••
5.8.
5.9.
5.10.
5.11.
5.12.
5.13.
5.
5.15.
5.
5 .17. Exterior ducts and vents. East .L ..... ' - ' ,....... ...,.
A
9.1. A
9.2. The <'001<11"\"
at .........
IJ.lVI.LVU A"'... " ' .... "
A study to
extending the .... . . , ........ ,LL .... ....,
34th
PART V
AND
PART 11
....................................................................... 59
Table 4.1. Square footage program, 1979.
Table 4.2. Quotes from the industry on IB ..................................................... 68
Table Construction phasing and bid amount (Government
PART 111
EVALUATING EX/ST/NG
PART IV
AND
A ......................................................................... 195
Table 9.1. for the ""rn .... '·'i-o.·
........................................................................................................280
t""-:lr>h'lnrr is not sufficient to cover
by many
.... '-' ...,...,.U.J.j.JUlU .....-'''""'-
case to ,...rH·.,tarY\ ....'n. .. ,...... ~1 U' ...." .... '-'- .......... I-,"',
study hunlan
on how to and in real world
Interestingly enough, he juxtaposes both schools with the '.''-''''',",,",UJ
This book proposes to employ the case studies method in a highly structured way,
as a complementary teaching method to both studio and lectures. Accepting the
parallel between design and managenlent, cases in this book follow the
structure of the cases by the Harvard Business School. Like those
the student with questions instead of providing
answers. planned throughout the development of the
the case a has to be made. At
there are no and wrong answers. What in the actual
case is often irrelevant. students should understand the issues involved and
propose a account the data that have been
"",·~~",anTc.r1 in the case, or additional can case
n-"~~"""" to the case. Process is equally inlportant in the development of the case,
and consideration should be given in the environment that the decisions are made.
Similar to the cases of the Harvard Business School, the cases on this book can be
u. ....J'v ....
.:>.:> ...'u. In a environment within a short time period. Although students
1 Because Wisdom Can 't be Told C.I. HBS, Note No. 451-005, 19 October 1940.
need to intensively, as it is outlined
to occur within an 80 minute
..... ...",."-F-, . . ..., .....
the decisions to
of the design process, and should reflect
design process. Such a notion is particularly important, is a business
aspect in the practice of and case studies could easily shift towards an
entirely business case. 2
The educational process of the case studies method has four components: 3
., individu al analysis and preparation,
optional informal ".... U. . . -z::.l
2 i.e., the case on The Architects Callabarative, 1973, HBS, No. 9-582-961.
3 An Intraductian ta Cases by Benson P. Shapiro, 1984, HBS, No. 9-584-097.
4 Leamillg the Case Methad by J.S. 1980, HBS, No. 9-376-241.
The should make a note VVJlV.L'A'" on scratch paper and
revisit the case, sorting out the for each problem area.
Analytical tools should be as
• The student should develop a set of '-'V,JJ..U..UJ.VHu.'.... ~.nJ.h' supported by his/her
analysis of case data.
alternative courses of
• criteria should I use to
What action should I
111 How should I in case and in the classroom my
1.
1. What is
for the
.1
"The most efficient way to support a
is to use the four-story
Engineering, lnc. ro.rr"\'CJ..~r structural for
addition of the new Hospital for Infants and
..--""1'1'01,1"" .LVULLJ.J.J'""
to the
'-',LUCL",,"L,",",,", Center Hospitals Boston. Nevins had
TJ,""' .... ,,""',"''-
of center.
i,,",,"'J1:'''"'',u gained its name because it used a to get the children out onto
air.
1.1. The New England Medical nO~ïDll:alS area.
on~anlze;C1
Boston Redevelopment Authority had no
to
UUUC'-'.1.V the South Cove, so set up
office under the leadership of Hermann
!-'.1.UiJ.ii ..lJ.J.5 Based on large part
0I..U\..U V 0 Dre~DaJreC1 by the BRA applied for Planning which
of in consultation with T-NEMC and community
Plan the South Cove Area, which was
e Symbolically, l"Arl1·Ac,c>nr,,,,rI a
entity, still to
• Professionally, promoted social interaction and v.n ...n ......u.LF,'-' among
in different
V..L\.-,"'C>Jl'VH.U."O (physicians were more to meet
because their departments connected horizontally rather than
towers).
Functionally, the continuous floor areas permitted reassignment of
space garden courts through the
VJ..1.LUJ.F,V'-'-,
, 1
1 I1
Hospital for
-'-'-' ....' .. i.LJL~ .lL.1.1............. '.. "
plans for
co st of the L-shaped scheme, a IJ-'-"-'-'->';''-U''''''
Street, based on a structural design proposed
structural consultants the master plan study.
3 The Boston UU;peJ1Salry the Ll'_~+.~.~ Hospital and the New bn~~larld Center nm;pwu.
1.3. design of the building proposed
1
"""H'I'>TP of the Master New
decided that the
4 By 1974 the role of the Tuft-New Medical Center had dramatically shrunk. New
England Medical Center Hospitals carried out the design of the addition of the new
revised the
requirements for the new addition (Fig. 1 Harlow:
The scope of the of the present Boston Floating
Hospita1 5 , puIling into one structure in- and out-patient care for
fJ ..... at the medical center... It' s important to
Ul.lUC'L.l ... " that the facilities will
be a part of the total health care center and in the design of the facilities this
should remain paramount. At the same it is desired that the identification of
the Floating Hospital continue and a of the program is an identifiable
pediatrie facility which would be the Floating Hospital, its own entrance.
HOSPITAL US ERS
lnpatientiOutpatient
Certificate of Need
1
The land available the Hospital in was in two parcels: one was
west
i\J\..'U"'-,U Washington Street and was marginally utilized by the ..... ....,,"1-'.1. ........1..
contained a parking lot and a small (Fig. 1.6); the other ":HiJ.I.-I.J.J.'",-J.
1
and shape of
iV'-'I.-I.l-J..V.1.J. building was the agenda for
6, 1976 8 . An initial thought was to locate the
However, sueh a solution
,....t:>.,!yn"'r -n,~1"1'Yl1tt",rl nor desirabie a
also have tó be
Street part of the .... u ............... "" ......, ......
to the
eXlstlng subway tunnels
Washington Street was a to connect
the new facilities, though such a solution faced
architectural problems.
In addition, the construction management team pointed out that erecting the major
portion of the building on the east side of Washington Street would be even more
expensive the west side. The lot was smaller than the west side and there
was not sufficient open space surrounding it. Thus, it would be necessary to hire
a crane order to comply with the BRA requirement to Washington Street
This idea also shared many of the of
L U ...' U.." .....L.UC"- the inevitabie of a rise building, and was th"" ...""i-n. ..".
WANG CEN'1'ER
1
Spanning thc ~ULULAJ...,"VLÁ Street was the solution proposed the
TAC Mastcr Plan and The was to build a major
portion of thc hospital ovcr with sn1aller parts on the two
originally alloeated lots, east and west of Street. Sueh a solution
"'hHH.LL.;;;"vu'H
fulfillcd all thc objcetives: the lin1it on the ....u .•u.u.J'h was no langer an
the street
9 Barr and Barr was the construction management team of the Master Plan as wen.
disagreed with solution, arguing that it was too
the complex to give a sense of autonomy to
intentions this time were clearly defined. The building had to be ",,,,,,"\,,, ... ,,,1-,,,
felt it, too, did not address sufficiently the autonomy of the
addition, a simple rectangle would have to be nearly twice as
Sll,!pe,a scheme and would cover approximately 200 feet along It
might overwhelm the street below, creating a dark, on the
pedestrian level.
The meeting of February 6, ended without <' ...... "',r"I"'r' ....... ,.." ".u;;;. ,u, ",,,,nr·lnC'1n ..~,,,
1
presented
..LI-'--'-'-'C"..Ul
Hrl""i"'T\ ........ " " a r tfor a moment to all ow She was confident
made than any of schemes
the community succeeded
of complex, yet
.LA......' ........"" .......
organization:
Geometric order as the basis of form is demonstrated in nature and art,
as in the logarithmic of the nautilus shell 1.11). The l1 ..... ,r!P.· ... ", ..... n-
geometric order of this is a 28 foot square: out of that, every
been n-Pl"'Pl"<'It,,·ri
for the beds while shortening circulation routes for staff. The
mechanical room required great and followed the 340 feet to
the extremes of the building (Fig. 1.12).
The stair tower on the southeast corner is the of the entire building. The
corner is where the building shifts from . . ...,,,· ....u.E>uu.u.... to to curve. It' s
where mass is dissolved as line and 1.8).
as farm.
mechanical (left)
(right).
1
Following Ericson' s pn~se:ntatlOn,
solutions to A1'Y'11"1nn,rl<::l1rp
O'i" ....
Proper selection of the of the trusses can assure that can easily span the
120 feet of Washington Street The trusses can be assembIed in
Their lower cords will be assembied and installed as a self-standing e1ememt,
supporting itself as a long slender beam. Then the diagonal and the vertical
members will be positioned and attached to the lower cord, above
Washington Street, while the street wi11 remain open to the traffic. The
construction of floors will follow, by the previously assembIed trusses.
Parking Garage
of 120 an
to the main direction
Fig. A cross-section of the
schematically).
dome above his two floors were hung by cables from the
dome itself. Dean ClU.f;;"F,'~O"'-'u..
A set of two or more arc hes across Street could support the
floors below with cables in a manner similar to the floors of the Grain '-'.".,~U""'jH5V
The structural arch and cables should be exposed. Such a
solve the structural problems and will be distinct in the manner described
Harlow and would create a gate on Washington Street.
tll!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!I!!!!!!!!!!!!!I!I!1
(after Schodek,
1
J..U'-"vU.UF" J ohn N evins supported on
would be the best ''',..of''''........ "1-.. to span the 120 feet
This would give for a building that
the other proposed
"'-.LV.!.V..,.." C>VJLULJlViJlUO were also u.u.'_L.L'-',~,n,,'u.
Heger in an attempt to
solution.
12 lndividual beams were designed for 100 psf, in order to accommodate the loads due
to hospital equipment. the main hearing elements surmortulg the total
area were designed for 40% of the loads of all contributory areas.
his asked an engineer in team to look at the
design. The search started
I-H.UL..LV..L.LU. a frame, with individual beams on every
floor. For the loads of 100 psf average13 and for a spacing of beams
every 12 the total load was almost 1.2 kips per foot. No commercially
available steel cross section can take these loads for a 120 foot span.
concrete would also be quite as it would introduce an 'Vu,.,,"u............uJ.F,
dead weight and would Steel and
then considered and
prestressed concrete '-'UJl'-'U1.UL1.VJ.J.L> ct1rHl"""n
co st would be
keeping
a length for
Besides the need for open space in the rooms of the fifth fioor,
another major issue is the de sire for expressed quite vel1enaenlUy
program. The trusses would bloeIe valuable window space,
amount of natural in the As a children' s lIV'~lJi""U" ple,aScml,
spaces are a The of
patient' s environment would also be hurt by the presence of the trusses.
14 Cables form the catenary shape when unloaded and the funicular when loaded.
proper support the cable during construction is required in to achieve the
anticipated funicular
15 Third floor within the "mega-trusses".
1
challenge and
located in the Boston
pvr,prIPn/'Prl significant delays.
John Frost, one two nrln~l'nl~~C
on how to avoid similar problems
organization and management
scheduling techniques and is
1n1","Arln~,:>.'" the of allocation
of resources, business of
architectural v.V'J""",L.I..
basic scheduling assumptions, and what resources you u..... v'"',"'-.. \.!
this job? Please present a schedule, as precisely as you can.
5. Please comment on of to <l.Y'hl·tA,-,,fll'"<l
practice.
Unfortunately, the firm had been consistently having difficulty meeting time
constraints on their projects. The delays had strained the firm' s relationship with
the as weIl as with the contractor and suppliers. The profits of the firm were
undoubtedly being carved away by these delays as weIl. John Frost understood
that working on unfamiliar with new can cause delays, but he did
not that Gamma Design was having on weIl known
Hasser.
Massachusetts. was the owner' s sixth the Boston area, four of which
had been designed by these architects. Contractual negotiations began in
January of 1993, and the parameters of the project were defined soon.
15%
40% 10%
20%
were set,
would
rlr~1n:T1'n(T a total of to 40 hours to complete,
sheet would cost an average of $40 per hour.
Because coordination with engineers was expected for the Café Voltaire, the
higher hour time was used. This meant that Gamma Design planned
on producing each sheet in 40 person-hours, at $40/hr. In this case, 6
drawings were required, and a of $9,600 was worked out for
construction documents as a if
$9,600 equals 40% of the biIlable project, the total fee would be $24,000.
The figures of $26,250 and were close enough to feel con1fortable
assessment of project's scope. During their first LLH."''""' ......... .....
a fee of $24,000 .
iiV!"-.V ....u ..... v u .
wish to
mid-
parameters
...u ........... , .........''-'
For example,
in others.
,.. .... a ..... "I"o.1'I
stages.
past experience
'"A.U.'J ......." .
process to
examine what had caused the
111The
lilThe
2 See Pollalis, S.N., Computer-Aided Project anc,lf!elnelzt: A Visual Scheduling and Control
System, Vieweg Verlag, Wiesbaden, 1993.
resources for
""ar'H,,-ar! should be identifiable.
should constitute
each task should be rI,:.-tl11<:lhl
among the tasks should be ....
vv\.AJ.vLlv""ü "ne.u.." .... ..., ... ...,.
The process of identifying the that cornPI1se .........r"'''''.. is the task breakdown
'j"
CONTRACT NEGOTIATION ~,
SCHEMATIC DESIGN T
Each
independent or
constraint that a task can start only after
one constitutes a on
to two actual constraints. First, when the
completion of a task for the the other
Second, when the resources dedicated to one must in order to be
for the execution of the other In many cases, a task could start
is still executing. can on a network by
task in two subtasks and
such a splitting of a task may be
..... "',........ , .. ,.,1"",,....
LlI..lVLULll:\." are not at the same level as the other tasks on the rI""1tulI",rlr
2.2. The arrow notation.
The network diagram (project schedule chart) for the Voltaü'e was
by Kim Rasser using MacProject Pro 1.53, as shown in 2.3. On a such a
is indicated with text. The starting time, the finishing time and the
next to node. Similarly, resources are indicated with text
at the top right corner of the diagram describes the
.... ,,"'''"''''-'.1'-''-' to each task. to that the information
.-.rr'""'"·'"-,,,,,, eX<:::ClItlCm of
as was
U V A A ' " ' ' '•••U .•..., , of each
task of the project and the Rasser
that the actual duratiol1 of each task, shown at the bottom right corner of each
task box, is not the billable time on that task, but the total calendar time
to that
3 Mountain California.
LEGEND
25 Jan 5 Feb
~ 25 Jan 7 Feb
In network representations, the tasks on the critical path are marked clearly to
distinguish from the other tasks of the project in order to attract the appropriate
attention. For the Voltaire, all tasks are sequential in nature, thus all lay on
the critical path.
The deterministic nature of the critical path method for a process that is highly
variable and uncertain is a major to specify the exact
of each task among the tasks is
the
In Gantt presented the scheduling chart that bears his name. The Gantt
chart is a one-dimensional chart with the horizontal axis representing time. The
tasks are presented on the chart as parallel horizontal bars of constant width. The
starting time of task is defined as the left of bar
the en ding time of
relative
is a tendency to include
tasks. Such a practice aften is .u,A.A.U.I...., ....... JlU,!'-.
Name 25 Jan 22 Feb 22 Mar 19 Apr 17May 14 Jun 12 Jul 9Aug 6Sep
_~~;!~~~on §
Schematic Design J~EGEND
~esi&n
o actual
0 o planned
..
Documenls
Bidding c=:::J
Occupancy <I>
<I
1 + - - - - - LENGTH ----~I
STARTING FINISHING
TIME TIME
4 The quantified bar chart is part of the Visual Scheduling and Management system (VSMS),
patented to Prof. S.N. Pollalis and Y. Ueda by US Patent 5,016,170 of May 14, 1991. This
is presented in: Pollalis, Computer-Aided Project Management: A Visual
;)cr!eal~lllr!R and Control System, View eg Verlag, Wiesbaden, 1993.
Name 25 Jan 221,'eb 22 Mar 1'.1 Apr 17 May 14 Jun 12 Jul '.I Aug 6 Sep
i ~~~!~~~:on i---'
~JL
LEGEND
D octual
Schematic Design
D planned
r--------- f--- t-
i !?esi~n
~r~ --t-
.6idding
n
With this information available, Kim Hasser has identified potential problems in the
project organization. These problems concern particularly the scheduling of the
of milestones for the of the
.............,..L..L ....U.H•.,U. ...JLV..L.l
u ..u\J.u.vu'....LV.~.l0,
not just because of an occupancy of
Gamma s involvement in unexpected mediation between the contractor
and the dient. This extra time often results in cutting the firm' s profit margin.
For future projects, Hasser can also recommend adaptations within the computer-
based scheduling These would indude more flexibility in changing
schedule if half-way process and the
use of ",""~'o.rlln
has arr;an~;ed
'-'U~LV'-'''') at Dariza Design wanted to expose structure the new factory
were designing in In order to make the
of the overall """.'l"-F.Jl.L, worked closely
"".LU.... ....,"""...,
On
FelloH' Jane Wemick and Associate Spiro N. Pollalis nronnl"on this case
as a basis class disClissioll rather than to illustrate either effective or 'I1LJ1'To""t11'O
handling an administrative situation, a process or a design
Alpha
Having acquired an umle,rel<)oe:C!
attractive headquarters
image. It was equally important, however, not be v,,,~'v.ulCulCnJUè'J
out of character with its surroundings. The scheme also had to allow
expansion. The factory would employ the most ~.l.lV'U.V.L.!..L pnlll1t"'rrnt:>nt
.U"HU.LU..LLL'-'l.U..LJ.J.J.F',
The hilI top site 3.1), is sheltered by mature trees to the south west but is
eX1Dm;ed to the north and east, views A -nre:'''''--'''H'
site investigation, supplemented by later trial revealed a SU(Xe:SSlon
of fill and topsoil glacial Except for a slight seepage
wet was observed. From west to east, the site slopes
To the west, the is nearer the
surface, covered by only about of topsoil
the bedrock is overlain by about 3m of glacial
occupied by a derelict house with a garage and a AH.')"'..LVv ......' .....
3.1. The
One of the most ,""" . . . ,...,.1'..,. ... 1' v'v ...,u" ... '-'-....,................,..h,
with the role that automation was to play
work-stations would be supplied with materials and
automated warehouse, using computerized retrieval systems and ..........,. .,... . . . . ""...,. ~u. ... '-.v .....
This system would also deal with the receipt of incoming . . u .... " ......... ".,,'"
can be
efficiency based on the horizontal and
cranes. In general, a higher warehouse is more efficient.
warehouse then depends primarily on the storage capacity required. Other
C'O"'Ull"'O the 1""01""1-l"1>r'''7 and the
among
to ,,"'·vu.,.. '-'V' • .L"......, ........ .L"'F-. u...,,'-'-'!'
terms a
particularly on a as it is ....... uu.u ....... LJ .• "'''''' ..... ,
trees.
Budget and the project was on a tight budget, the client planned to
take advantage of government loans that would be available to him if
construction were started by November 1985. The design team was appointed in
1985. In order for
n ..... n n ...'" contractor to start in the bid had to
by the of and the contractor
..., ................ I-'A..... " ..... '-'-IJIJV"'U'-'-'''''
The
to use of space re(~Uirelnents
vVJLLL\"".L.l.J..LV\...L
addition, a concentrated 8
applied to those locations which produce
elements. The design live loads were used for the . . . . . . v, ,LJ"-.....................
the main building, and the link. The roof is inaccessible: therefore, for
live loading condition on the roof is less severe than the snow load.
In the warehouse the design live for the concentrated areas on the
level was to be 50 KN/m for the total building height of
2
According to the Miller & Partners, an initial estimate for the maximum load for a
steel roof 14.4m both ways, including roofing and suspended
and only is 3 A minimum weight, however, could
2 In Britain, single story UUUUU'j"-," do not need to be fire n ...n1rpl't,o.rI .bXI)Os~~d steelwork is
therefore acceptable.
3 125
4 The provisions of the U.S.A. BOCA National '-' .. ".F, code are used in this section.u ........
be as low as 1 KN/m 2 • The initial estimate for the n1aximum de ad of a
concrete mushroom slab under the same is 10
an ....'.
H ..U ...LVU .... .L
....lLH.. "F,<.a.eu. with the maximum magnitude " H. .l.lU.VU..I. ....... v"
Located in a seismically inactive area, the o,., ..'rnf--.l1'C"TO laad can be . . . ....,f" ... ....,'...- ......., .....
authority.
Compacted til!
Glacial til!
Fig. 3.3 shows the main building that accommodates the program and its
relationship to the link. A 14.4m module was established Dariza Design with a
4m floor to the and a floor to roof ~~VJlF.~JlL.
u .... a to be placed in area shown in
'''V.LJLHLJLV .... U''...,
I J "'LUon COJmp'aClcea
"-'dCp;;..
down to
paths of set into grooves cut into the concrete cover.
required finish the concrete was
PLAN Main Building
ELEVATION
For the steel solutions various types of were considered. Trusses could
also be at double span i.e. of 28.8m span.
Because the c1adding line was to
vVjlU.~J..lJ.h' the amount of bracing that was was to be rYl1rnrY'lFl,,,,,rI
The basic planning grid that Miller & Partners proposed was 1.2m x 1.2m. Thus,
there were 12 bays any two columns in each as
shown Three were studied the I->.L.L.L.L~I->"""
a grillage consisting of 3 beams as shown in
a grillage with 4 direction and 3 "'v'-'vuu,"u
beams, as shown Fig.
a grillage with a as shown in
W
1.2m typ.
optimal span
\Ij (practically, 3.6m limit)
of cladding
'-'I-" .......... i'....... .. 'U'VU .... '"'.Li
""'<:>,1'"\1'"\."..\(... of services
* attachment to primary trusses
the 14.4m grillage had to be broken down into pieces
transportation.
a. b. c.
cross-sections of
The architect, on the other hand, requested that the selected section of the beam
should the top chord of primary truss.
o"c,ra."" was was with the aPlJealraIlce
The primary trusses, supported on columns, should provide the support for the
beams. The configuration of those trusses selection
the location of the IJV'~UL'>J.
of
could be set in from the perimeter. Thus, an optimal depth should be established
so there would be sufficient for penetration,
the of the 3.7 shows
and an C>.-v'tcu'nnF,'-'-.'-J.u.F,V
cladding
Columns
a) Vierendeel:
o Moment connections
Point loads from secondary grillage More Steel
e Easier services penetratIon
b) Truss:
Easier connection (pinned)
$
Less steel
a) .. Poor for services perletratlClI1
c) Deep Truss:
b) .. Pinned connections
Less headroom
e)
• Allows cladding to through to
d)
underside of top
e Allows more services penetration
e) \/ \/ ~\/
t) Short Truss:
e As b) but allows to pass through
t)
considered. could be
the connections in each truss
PLAN ELEVATION
Le,L"t bracing
- greatest eoneenlralion or load
onlo foundations
- many <UTtUlgemenls possiblc
allowing more pcnetrations
3. What is
the lengthy process of design and construction of a complex .Ul...."Ul.'vUl.
Doctoral student Thom Kurmel and Associate Professor Spiro N. Pollalis prepared this
case as a class discussian rather than to illustrate either effective ar ineffective
handling situatian, a design pracess ar a design itself Original
research was canducted as part af the doctaral dissertatian af Thom Kurmel an The Impact
Technalagy in Hospital Design.
"
care
during a fire.
be hospital occupancy, while most
considered to ambulatory care or lJ"'''~.U.J.''-',.>c) vV'VU.lJUJ..LV
BUILDING TYPE SI ZE
OCCUPANCY 101)
3 Level of patient care provided based on staff and facilities. Most medical centers are
tertiary care facilities.
4 National Fire Protection Association, Quincy, Massachusetts. A national UUL.LUHLl:'.
organization dedicated to the public through fire and building safety L"-';:;h".lGlUVl1.
U.S. Department of Commerce 19 July 1981
Commerce Business ~ No. 134
...:"..,''"' .... r ..
R - - \.rchltect:-bngll11eer Services.
A-E services
BODI BOD 11
NOTEJ
~
Pllase 1 Phasc 11 Phasc 111
by conferences
Over 150 "1",..,h1r~~f't", consultants,
.I..I.H." .... .I.'''''".I.
Sound and prominent Mount . . "-.. . . dominate the views to L U ........, ...
Base
(Amlbulaltory Care Occupancy)
communicati 011,
and are designed to
future changes.
This feature
but by only a over conventional 'U-V"'.I.fo',.1."0
General Comment:
Cost Comments:
Comments:
Construction Comments:
:ScJtledluljlng Comments:
"I have with two identical one [IB] one conventional. The
hospital 24 months and the conventional taak 36 months ... "
"[IB] forces "
"Activities outside [IB] are on the critical
"Fast-track is a natural with [IB]."
In systen1s
'-'.I>.'.......... JLp""VL>, vu..U.Y.LJ..J..F;''' success in
11·m'·tart
building with
7 V.l>.'~vLI.n'-'·"" from "Madigan '-"UIH.. <:-,,,,' Design Submittal," John Graham and
Sherlack, Smith, and June pp.99-100.
building systems to the estimate. The cost projections not only
conventional costs, but went over the Congressional co st "''-'..........,' . .
"''-'>.u. ..., .................. .L'V
The real benefits of the Integrated Building Concept are constructability and long
term Experience in Canadian IB hospitals claimed savings
time. is indeed remarkable considering that the building
more materials (structure, piping, etc.), more cube footage, and is slightly
footprint due to redundant utility that
are in hospitals due to the
'-'>.H..'>.>. .... '..-" layout
in the distribution zone. It also facilitates servicing without disturbing
zone, which can operate continuously. At the time of the design of the
uJ.J.'..,'-J.'Jl.H......
New Madigan, no hard economie data existed for long-term use of the IB concept
any building. 8
8 Several studies were conducted in the late 60's and but na substantive jtlnCT_Tl"Trn
According to resistance
and "'VJLL":HL>'-""U The frame
of of
rooms. i.UA"""h'C.L.Lh
to 4.3), a cOlnpetitive
was awarded on December 11,
of Bellevue, for million. W ork
... a .. 1"n.lllt-1nC'r infrastructure and for construction of utilities, road
'V.i".u-'" ......... fo',
-- JOB IFB DACA 67-86-B-0001. -- Tentative issue date is on or about 86 JAN 10.
There be a non refundable of $1,600 for the set of Spt~cljtlclltl(mS
and drawings. Also available are of and for following
non refundable charge per individual Mechanical Electrical $650.00,
Architectural $400.00, Structural $130.00 and Civil $70.00. Bidders individual
sets discipline are cautioned that total by for a project is not
100% achievable. It is advisable if individual that plan holders
examine other for relative data. response is NOV 22 in the
form of written communication advising how and
draWlIH!S. and/or how many sets of individual and drawings are
with checks made to the Corps of is reCIU11~ed
~' H"~H~ will be
' - ' ..... ... Phone requests will Project is
and smal1 see Note 65. A pre-bid conference will be held
The conference and place will be addressed in the IFB.
Total $ 277.7 M
NOTE 1 NOTE2
conventional construction
1I Part of the cost estimate inc1udes a smaU contingency for during the
project.
I2 Also referred to as P ACS or Picture Archiving and Communication
13 Studies were being conducted at Georgetown University Medical Center and The
University of Washington in Seattle with funds provided by the Research and
Development Commando
x-ray '"''-1 ...... 1.......... ''....,...,.... ,
vuu.vvu Up to 60%.
Network Highlights
Software:
Customized is needed in each sutlsystelIls for example: an Archiving
in the Archiving Sulbsystem image requests from
anVA'""V"\.--,-
no to
is so new that space programmers in had no way of
predicting types of advancements. One advantage available to decision-
makers was Madigan's Integrated Building System and its ability to adapt to new
technology. Other being made in
industry, promising better
Madigan Digital
General Offker in Process
Executive Summary:
U.J. ....-'-'O-JlJ.J.j:;. generm:ea much discus sion and n)')ll~;ed on current state of
and benefits of acceptance medical
UI..-',-,I..-l.I..-.U:.t.LI..-U construction schedule.
on
images over cables would
transport systems and stations already Qe~aglleQ
_~_'_~A~_~'A. '-'-ó"'"U''"''iS, emergency power, and other
rpnIH11"'pn1iPntl:'
Doctoral student Alberto Diaz Hermidas prepared this case lillder the supervisioll of
Associate N. Pollalis as a basis for class discussÎon mther than to illustmte
either of an administrative situation, a design
research was conducted as part of the doctoral rJTl:l:pr'tntlnl1
Alberto Hermidas on the Injluence of Delivery Methods Oll Architectural V"'rI"O/'T"
Case Studies the SevilIe Expo'92,
'-'U .....U.Jlj;;;. -'"' ..... "'~v construction technologies ..... VJLJ.~~~H ... "Jl~~5
builders of the pavilions.
Cruzcampo
Official ~D<ms()r
Construction costs
Operation expenses
Total expenses
Revenues (million pts)
Miguel
V.I..I..I.,ev,",", of
most prestigious architects
of the Spanish
......... ...., ............... '''-'.1.
October 1989.
" a miniature
space to explain the beer
to offer a corporate, . .v v.... ,U.l.v.l.'I..,F. ...,"' .........I.y
and local pride of the company.
...............1."' .... ..,
In the presentation of his schematic design, Mr. Oriol proposed a
copper-shed volume. Open to the south for access, the building was
north, by means a north-light roof and a huge, movable bay HT1"'rI,......" , "' ....,.."nrun .....
whole north facade. Mr. Oriol described this feature of the project as
coincidence of our visual objectives [the lake] an orientation
is hot nor " In the the beer production
public, doubled as exhibition and brewery. Conventional space was
J.J1aJllIleu. In to the use of the land, the plan of the building r""", ..... r.1nrt,:.rt
The resulting rectangular are as
functions. The rectangular area would be used for
V.L.L".• u " ....' .....
The beer plant manufacturer supplied the architect with dimensional and supply
specifications of the facility, to be considered during the design of the building.
Cruzcampo asked Mr. Oriol to have construction documents of the pavilion ready for
bidding by October 1990, in order to start construction end of the year.
Cruzcampo to the public in August of 1990.
IJ.LV0VU,\.VU
areas (m 2).
Lower
5.5. Upper basement plan.
c011vemH~ntJly wide,
were visible directly from
..., .......... "" ....u b ' an amphitheater-like,
area, an indepen-
be accessed
I J IJ'''J.J.U.'''.!..!.;:;;' all across the north facade, a huge window uninterrupted view
the restaurant. interference of
'"''V.u.............. ,,,, the
V r:.,
.... JL ...... JL .... two
L-section concrete towers
Artificially aged copper and "bronze" glass were the only materials V~IJV"'VU
the exterior of the building. The concrete of the towers was pink to match the
reddish copper bron ze of the facades. The such
colors to the of
South elevation.
the presentation of the Cruzcampo promised ' - ' V ' H fo','CO< ,
consultant
"''''''('1"1"",,''''''1''1'''''('1" also in Madrid- to
tions and the structure. The hot summer c1imate of and the hl''::'Ul<''1'''U
5.9.
20 cm below the excavation <..,.1.."'" ... structure was a .l.l. ..... system
of concrete columns "'<-"-IIJIJ'-''''''' back platforms the
area of the restaurant. For the roof of the pavilion, .1. consultant designed UV •• L ........
two concrete towers, and two cables springing from the top of each tower
5.10, and 5.1
Within the roof structure, an unusual Glass Reinforced Concrete panel north-
light roofing system doubled as both weather protection and naturallightning system
5.10 5.11).
Complex HVAC and electrical systems were designed to respond to the demanding
requirements of the kitchens and beer brewing in addition to provide with
to
'-'Vl.H".LUV.UJ.J.JlF,areas. The of restaurant, in
order to to 600 seats.
beer plant and museum.
aV1nn<"art ............. "...,............ "', surfaces, and furnishings C:X:l:cn'81·<70 ,," to ensure
uniformly designed environment. mechanical, and
drawings, submitted align-
ment, physicallocation and VVjlJ..l.... J~Uj."".I..v...... those systems was
to the general contractor. is not unusual in Spain .
.....,"" ........... ""' ............................,..LU, have an active role in the construc-
allows them to control the final outcome
construction documents package was not totally VVjLU.IJ .... ...., ......,.
The Cruzcampo takeover by
400,000°
Electrical 71,600 71,600
Beer Plant (GMP)
Total Subs 400,000
400,000
568,600 168,600
0
42°
Total 1,538,054 1,748,600 210,546 14
As aresultofthe r-h~~nC1rp"',V,",'H'<l,h
...F.,........'-"" a
would bring aboutmany change orders. 1-1,..,.·... 7 0 ' ' ' 0 ...
Despite the impact of the delays, however, the was still under
control. The new thick slab system was less !"> ... pile foundation.
'V ...... .!. ... '.......
curvature.
became very complex, with more than 90 "",",vUVJ.h) and crowning sections
around the building 5.13). costs increased, because
linked to the foundation slab below ground and exposed above, had to
times with concrete of different colors. In addition, efficiencyexecution r!p,--rp<::lc>,::'r!
due to unexpected changes (such as requests . openings) during the pouring of the
wans. Particularly critical was the delay in the definition of the area of the garage ramp,
which provided access to the basement for the execution of other tasks. Eventually,
the retaining were not finished until early The overall impact. of the
retaining wall segment on the project schedule was a delay of 14 days. Direct co st
retaining wans was estimated by Dragados to be more
costs .
..... rh'V'l,~,."'t ........ t·i,T<:"
U'-".. dOJlV.U. to
construction
of connections of the facades to floorings
retamlng walls. Complexity in execution increased, because the new concrete
'-'V.lH.l'-''-'t-.l\J.uo .... arn"'~arl framework, and because some exterior walls featured curving
shapes, to form. Furthennore, since none of the new concre~e walls had been
defined in the initial structural plans, additional form had to be .....u.'.n>.l-'...,v~...,
........
The general contractor produced UÁL'vÁJ.JLUH solutions, faxed them to the structural
consultant and called IAnóTrI1D1"nnr'o proceeding with any
portion of construction. architect before approving any
changes, and its response was since the feedback of
.... ""~ . . .,......'. . . information from the site the detailing and
Mr. Oriol and OTEP were "'A1'~C'1"r,n1"I"'T ..""... na.,r1~'" changes, often
when structural elements were already or even IJ'-'\.u.v'.... Between May and
;JVIJL,.n,UIJ'VÁ of reported as many as 19 "","""nU.lh\.n,.l.v",v>J
Eventually, structure-related delays (inc1uding .!.V~'~.LLLLLLF, concrete wall T .... n, .... "'''''''
and structural elements) added to a total of days. The orO.f'"r\11 ofthe roof structure
did not begin until mid September, nearly 4 months schedule.
to the requested amount to the general contractor, Mr. '--' ....'u............., ....
Qe(am:~u to two cost-saving management First, he would
subcontract and supervise the electrical and HVAC
known as sub-bidding, allows construction managers to save in contrac-
tor coordination fees and secure lower he would
additional pressure on the
Mr. Carranza intended to
contractor in compensation of
)ra~!ad<)s
approached its subsidiary GRC J..l.L"l.U.U..LU'-'L""'.L
5.16. Roojïng.
of
Clrcumsltan(:;e of ..,...,.....H" ......"'..
to comment on operation-oriented
concerns was the restaurant hardwood finish. environment
by the wanl1, noise-absorbing hardwood would contribute to a
reduced customer turnover. On the contrary, a noisier restaurant environment,
more in with the fast-food concept, would help to revenues.
east flanking the restaurant was also deprived of its cavity wall and
smooth stucco This particular issue was controversial. The
the building's exterior was already erected when
elin1inate the interim' cavity Given the visual prol11inence of the wal!,
The generaicontractor, however, del11anded additional funds and
>.-........ ,,'"',"" ... '-',...... u'-''-+.
ally, the rough concrete the wall remained in contrast with the rest of the
restaurant, finished in '""'"' ..... . ." . . . ,,""'
Instead, in late
Cruzlago a
Cruzlago
as 8,000 daily
of
..., ........'uJ-!"." layouts and the sel'eCllOn
whole building would
"' .... "'n".'" Sl31e,ctea low-cost, low-quality .!.,,-,- ...'v.o.n.'.!." .L ..... ,u.,.u....,u..A,u'
only months of operation.
savings were contractor. Furniture installation started
reH~cte~C1
the proposal of the general contractor.
UJ.vu.......''"'''' ...
architect interpreted the redesign proposal of .......}-, ....... as "an unnecessary "JU '-'.LH"-U'F-,V
was Cllc,nt:>,nrlç'rI
Mr. Carranza considered that both and schedule were too tight to allow for the
development of complex joint solutions or to afford extensive leak rep airs during the
winter. As a result, he authorized Dragados in December of 1991 to reinforce the roof
trusses and introduce the columns that invalidated the cable structure. Mr. Oriol,
however, persisted in opposition to the measure. In order to obtain approvalof
the Mr. Carranza added a to the contract which the
modification of the structure was tbe
schedule" and
.. n~~....,.L.L'~'" structure,
the new columns. The . . " .. '11n-111
process had
'-''''J,1.'' ..!LU ....·.., .......,1.1. costs near the
.......u.u ... v· ...... pts, and Cruzcampo could not afford the additional
Doctoral student Alberto Diaz Hermidas prepared this case under the supervision of
Associate N. Pollalis as a basis for class discussian rather than ta illustrate
either handling administrative situatian, a design pracess ar a
research was as part of the doctoral dissertation of
Alberto Hermidas on the lnfluence Methods on Architectural Prajects:
Case Studies from the Seville
COITlm11tme:nt by the
1'"\.::"1A11I1"1 the duration of world's lnt!ernlatlonai pavilions in
of the pavilion of the Holy cleared for the future
1"t3c'pO::I1t'r>h and development 1../.1.'-"IV ...' ....
Construcciones
an indefinitely
nA.~t- ""."....::u...... schedule. The contractors were lnt.:... ac.tarl
.....r.nc.rl ........ a good long-term
the Spanish Church, agreement was reached
Dragados, the ".L",.....Lu.'UJ..I.•.u. general >JIJ<.U ...... L'.U r>AlnT .. 'Clr>r,,..,. .. 0
on~c;elnU/'lL design.
Servicios 93 invited u..L.L,......L.LU''-"'.L
of vaulting brickwork.
1-'<'<1,'-"",1.1.1.
~ ...."u.,..
U.A.A.h water pond a garden outlined a exterior space.
enhanced the lightness of the glass and endowed the volume with· a "floating"
character. The interior was a brightly lit, uninterrupted open with an elevated
mezzanine. Despite the lack of partitions, clusters of columns and openings in the
mezzanine limited different interior and a large court.
the SOLLtn1;ve.~>t.
A thin, continuous
walls and vaults.
Graund [laar plan.
EXPOSICION
EXPOSICION
the and ü.L'-'.L.LU''-'J a-v1"",... ,rH· 01r.·,.,,-.h,, ...... ! and 6.9). Foundations were
wall.
SECCION LONGITUDINAL
In addition to
and contents.
Two An{'rln,::loArlnrr '-'VIIOUI .. UJ. .! .. "" and UOO.1."' .....' ..... Oriol
with the "',...,..,,,' .....,,,"' ....
columns
continuous pink concrete section.
The consultant
electrical, HVAC and
could be lnet with simple utility systems.
provide enough conditioning power. Given the mostly daily use
the openness of the space, lightning requirements were minimal.
work was limited to the rest rooms. Due to the configuration of the roof, gutters were
not necessary.
the design schedule was tight. Since construction of the utilities systems
could not until 1991, it was not critical to have complete construction
of the utilities
".n."-'LU.L.LVHLL> 1991. In networks, simple
building segments and
one of the collaborating
.. v ....'u;::;.vu..
process.
by the general
to
owner would
additions to the contract (32 J..U.LJU. .LU'U.
3/91 4/91 5/91 6/91 7/91 8/91 9/91 10/91 11/91 12/91 1/92 2/92 3/92 4/92 5/92
i
I I
Fo ndatiom (Draga~os)
30DI
1
Paving Dragado)
I 45
Masonry (Dragadc~)
I
I 45
Planned
Exl ibition I isplays ( pragadol!)
J~
1
Slack
xbibitio , Conten fS (Speci. list)
I
Construction 1991, by Dragados.
negotiation process
-----=---J the commencement of construction works,
contractors were forced to proceed under a schedule. The works
on June 6, two months behind the The construction team
of the works from the 3 architect, the
only the chief of would be
construction process. a schedule and
""''''L.'-'J.''' • U.'-'
vVJ1.l0 .... proper coordination of construction operations
...,V •..H .... 1-0 ,
Duetothe
in second half of
subcontractors of pre-cast piles were
to up with and execution for
subcontractor delayed the commencement of work on the foundations by
any delay in the foundations would delay the whole project, Dragados
of foundation to a site-cast pile system, so the general
contractor could use its own machinery and labor. The system was \./A....'-'U._'-'u •
to savings time and cost. The change in the
.L...., .....'-..L.L.L.Lh
affect the site-cast concrete slab that braced the piles, executed as y l J... .Lj"'>.u. .L'.....L ...
one, the
A"t"CI.A .. " " . . the building were already crowded, there was no room
for any Dragados requested from 93 that
pond and the strip of grass. The owner . . .1-.',...,..., ......
the proposal, but the 10ss of the "floating"
intended the LJUJ.H..U.J.J.F,'
common in Spain, since it is more cost-efficient to use ceramic caissons to .L.L!",'U"'' ' '.L.L
slab and make a formwork of wood planks supported on a scaffolding of telescopic
steel posts. However, the proposed system made sense in the specific case of the
pavilion See. The folded steel plate much fasterto erect, and
the elimination scaffolding allows the contractor to other activities below
the slab while it hardens (Fig. 6.12) .
.LJV01-1.Llc. . . the simplicity ofthe system and the in time allowed by the unconven-
tional construction procedure, the interior structure suffered substantial delays. In
order to keep up with the tight constructionschedule, Dragados had to overlap the
construction of the foundations with the manufacturing of members for the
interior structure. The of the and rlc'-" ..... '1ro
the columns of the exterior 01' .... 11"'1'111 ... '" AV1I"\Ar·h1'l,ty
the subcontractor
ov1:-a ... " .. C'f" .... " · ' " , ..·""
documents
the aluminum frame and
,",,,.,,,,1:-..,,,-,1"1A1I'>
Waterproofing requirements
IJ <,u"",-,"'-"..LF,.
architect expected.
Assembly
structure.
the J.J.v,::"VllULJLVH
Since all the utilities were exposed and the were conventional,
installation was easy. Abengoa assigned each of the to a subcontrac-
tor. The utilities, built between December 1991 and March 1992, were completed on
budget and on the utilities were not
Based on designed arather '-''-'J.U.'-<'UUAF"
View
construction
..... 1".", .." , .. work would
concrete.
two behind schedule .
,LL' as weIl as a
" - ' .... " U " " ' - L ..... """,ar>T1n."I'\
L _____ ,
6.18. Modified groundfloor plan (rooms 1 to
rl/t,,"t7/J'/t in termedia te floor plan Band
r .... .," .. ··.,,, .... ·, ...... ,............ ·.. ····· .... ·..ii ........ •.... r"·· .. ···· .. 11 ........ •.. ·g· .......... • .... ' ...... I .... .,' ...... II· .......... ·r ...... .,"··1·· ...... •.. ·1
Program
May Jul Aug Sep Oet Nov nec May Jun
Foundations (Dragados)
Exterior Structure
(Folcra)
Paving (Dragados)
Masonry (Dragados)
Uilities (Abengoa)
FInishes (Dragados)
Exhibition Displays
(Dragados)
45
Exhibition Contents
(Specialist)
30
SCJ'lel2U1~e as 1992.
insurance companies.
broadcast station and ordered ':>n(T1"Çi~iTPr1
Abengoa 30 days of wode for the required additions and modifications to the
utilities and the curtain wan enclosure.
in charge of the cOOl'dination and scheduling
V.L.L ...... u ..... v,'-',
3.
4.
......"n. .L....,"'''.... '-','-.. of its roadway of almost 10feet at the midspan. according
supporting the roadway were stretched as tight as
uv,.....v"', intrigued with the photograph of the deflected bridge on the news,
bridges and the Golden Gate Bridge documents; also arranged a .L ..........,'-'u..L.LF-,
7.1. Bridge.
The new however, also led to new problems.
was a more flexible structure and caused problems, v U ...' V .....LUJ...1.
age loads
for the flexible suspension bridges,
Vl.I,LV.UJ."""JlV
tower
towers
and the roadway must have the necessary to act as a vVJ,jL,U,H,H,/ULI I"'I'>'rTlA'nT
to excessive deflections as heavy loads pass along the ' - ' , L......... ...,.
as any other
..... .L,L""}-,'-'U.
which is ca1culated as
(c) deck
on the
support cable caused by a
concentrated load are more
uniformly distributed. The
cable and deck shape
constant.
of rigid bridge
however, continued politicking and soon '-'LU.LLJ ....' ' " ' ' that most of the e>" ..., .... " .....
for tbe project would come from the counties north the bay, not
Francisco. By 1923, he had gained enough support to his real fight for the
bridge.
The next great challenge was to finance the project. A considerab1e amount of
court action was taken as the city and counties sued and counter-sued each other.
Finally, the Golden Gate Company was fornled in 1928 and Strauss was
chief
UUIJ'-Hll".,\...1 in 1929, ten yem's he had become involved with the
7.5.
In 1930, with increased public support for the new design and with an eye on the
economic benefits that the construction project would bring, a million bond
issue was approved. Construction began on January 5, fifteen years after
Strauss's original proposal.
Strauss made two important decisions. First, arguing that the age of mass
was over, he decided not to include a train service on
he decided to north tower on a stone off the
shore, despite the opposition's fears that the tower would
great crevass. During construction, an
and Derleth, one of three
uu.,,.,J. ......, ... u.F,v, though exposed all these years, the in the
was clean and intact and still showed the rnarks. There is no evidence of
softening. 10
concluded that "This assUll1ption (that the of the horizontal winds on the
would borne entirely by the
far fron1 true, because the tower
of the ."12 The tower CJ"'F,U.1"-'ULLl
elegant proportions.
the play of light on the (Fig. with
tradition by the job to Morrow electrical ,-,u,,,,-'-UV'.d
design gave a look that would be as distinctive at
7.
12 The p.145.
Once the piers were towers went up sn100thly.
water and the towers up another 690
The towers tons of steel and were assembied
Ar>I,,,,,,,,",,,,,,, of each tower are 90 feet
I was up on the tower when the earthquake hit.... It was so limber the tower
swayed sixteen feet each There were a lot of seams, all the way to the
There were twelve or guys on top, with no way to down. The
wouldn't run. The whole thing would sway toward ocean, guys
would say "here we go!" Then it would sway toward the
were laying on the deck, throwing up and evelything. I figured if we go in,
iron would hit the water
was highly
-'-'.0. .. ' ..... ,...,""'
Each suspension cable passed over the top of the tower resting on a
known as a saddle. Russell one of the engineers responsible the design
and construction of flexibility:
200,000
in The dead
including structural and non-structural elements was approximately
19,400 lb/ft, and the expected maximum live load was estimated to be 5,700 lb/ft
for the roadway and an additional 2,000 lb/ft for the sidewalks. 16 Strauss
concluded in a commemorative poem, I!At last the mighty is donel! (Fig. 7.
14 The p.235.
]5 The first time that a net was used in bridge construction.
16 These loads are supported by the main parabolic cables at both sides of the bridge.
The center of the was deftected between
normal and was holding this deftected
vertical1y in a waveli1ce
UH'UUJlUUH}:', LHU'UV,L1,
17 San Francisco Examiner.. "How Safe was the Bridge," 27, 1987.
Fearful
an important event
rhythmic vibrations that
that had brought down the
................ 0-.>....., disaster. new engineer was brought to ....,,,. . . .
u .....u .. ....,
the dead weight of the deck by 1,550 lblft to almost 21,000 lb/ft.
7. 800,000 peaple (sixteen
n.".,~n"7n ta celebrate the Golden
for
lann'1'"Hl' celebration of the Golden Gate . . . . .l..I.'-'-<O.v
the event:
l'pr'\r\l'tpri
18 San Francisco Examiner.. "How Safe was the Bridge," 27, 1987.
Bridge engineers had similar concerns as they busily computed the u.U.''''A.I--''''''''''-''''U
live loads incurred by the bridge. Charles Seim (the former state transportation
department who was on the bridge during the
celebration, were forty people per
foot of foot 19, while the
at only 2,200 pounds per
"""' .. A..UJ.U.... ..,'-'-
that's a factor of
each vertical cable must be equal to the area of 8.4 actual sus:peJnm~r
since the latter are every 50 feet along the For the
roadway between the and the towers, you should use three equal
se~~m(:;nts, two vertical cables the area of each vertical cable must be
to area of 7.5 actual cables. the main tower on a
and use at the ends the cables. You also obtain accurate results if
you use a tnlss analysis instead of a frame If you'
choose to use a truss program, you must include rhHYl-rn''Ir ,eH
U..lu.};v ....
.::> ...... ""1--'''' . . . , the forces on dummy diagonals will be zero for
on each joint along the deck amd half the load on the joint at llli CiS1=,an. 1
to use a U'-"'-'.LU.VU
computed the
exact location of cables, as and the properties of the
as shown in Table 7.2. using a truss analysis
25
computer program , is shown same model using a frame
analysis computer is shown in Her first was to
check the forces in the with own She then obtained the
the at various points and she was very the
results.
VERTICAL CABLES
SUSPENSION CABLES
Associate Professor Spiro N. Pollalis and Master of Architecture student Thom McQuillen,
Harvard University, prepared this case as a basis for class discussion rather than to.
illustrate either effective or ineffective handling of an administrative situation, a design
or a design Original research was conducted as part of the course GSD
Architecture and Design the 15th through the lBth Centuries, by
Howard BllrrlS, Professor History of Architecture
Records
lnvention"
4 Magagnato, p. 28.
5 p.27.
site conditions dictated to a large extent the form of the
Embankments in place from the previous bridge set the height of the deck~ a flat
span was desirabie since horses and carriages had to cross the bridge. span
between the piers had to be as long as possible since the Brente floods every year
wh en the snow melts in the Alps, generating high water levels and floating debris.
Although the water level in the river varies greatly with spring floods, the river is
relatively shallow and level enough to allow Palladio to space the piers evenly
across the full width of the river (Figures 4 and
.. .four orders of piles were made in the river, thirty four foot 8 and a half distant
the one from the other. Each of these orders consists of eight beams thirty foot
and a foot and an half thick every way, and distant two foot one from the
other: hence the whole of the bridge comes to be divided into five spaces,
and its breadth is twenty six foot. Upon the said orders were some cross
beams, according to the said breadth sort of beams so are vulgarly
called which nailed to the beams driven in the hold them all
together, joined and united. these correnti, plumb on the said were
other beams, which make the length of the and reach from
one order to the othef. And because the di stance between the said orders is very
great, hence with the beams ways, could have been able to
support the weight that might have been put on wh en it should have been
grèaL some beams were bet ween these and the that serve for
und support purt of the besides which, other beams were
which being fastened in those that were driven into the and leaning
the one towards the other, were united with another be am in the middle of
the said distance under each beam for the length. These beams so
represent an arch, having the fourth part of its diameter in and so the work
becomes beautiful in lts form; and strong, because the beams that form the length
of the are thereby doubled in the
6 p. 26-27.
7 The bridge was bumed in 18 i 3 and reconstructed in 1821. It was a1so rlpc·trr.""prl
the Second W orld War in 1945 and rebuilt in 1947. Structural maintenance rep airs
were carried out over the life of the the latest occurred in 1966;
J.U5.U5"U.-J, p. 31.
8 Palladio refers to Vicenzan feet in his "'rTT1Y"TC
9 In Italian.
o Palladio, The Four Books Dover Edition, p. 67-68.
bridge and the river banlc
I
i I
14 A over the Rhine used by the Romans for purposes; Four books
of p. 63-64.
15 i. e., there is na fixed structural connection between the of
traIlste:rnIlg moments ; the beams rest on top of
8.7.
members
the connection net'wef~n
c ......'nl.TH"''''
16 The inclined members and the ...... "iS"... ''''-' are smooth lines; the resolution makes
them look as composed of sma11 segments!
Arch carries axial compressive
forces; beam acts in
along
17 the height of the arch equals one fourth of the distance between the supports of the
lor a along
19 Single section (21 x 21 versus the double section at the center span.
a pile (see cross section, 8.6); the cross beam serves only to the tops
the . Thus, the connections of the Bassana bridge are more
use of iron and
20 i.e., R.S. Allen, Covered Bridges of the Northeast, The lJlv!-,U'-,U Green Press, LeJUnl;rtolll,
1983.
lVla::'::'W"; uu::.c:u::.,
points of by the
transverse cross bridge
deck and are connected with the
8.14.
The bridge at Bassano its stiffness in the longitudinal direction from the
triangularization along the bridge, is formed by the members. The
abutments at both ends the solid
structure. In the bed ·1'h<~ Tn ... ...
bridge, although
to avoid the
'-'.lHJU;:::,J.J.
are a more
Caesar's bridge
VLVVo..V'U 8.7). It is unlikely that
is given hydrodynamic considerations, since the force of a tree
trunk supports would be many times greater the force produced
by the CUlTent of the river at highest velocity.
ltalian
nn11"A"',,,,,load
0.4 tJm 2
The live on a
22 Pedestrian should be loaded with a live load of 400 kgf/m2 N/m2; 82 pst)
only.
of
Pedestrian Bridges
Uniformly distributed load: 85 psf
.. Automotive Bridges
Automotive (highway) are rated according to the heavier truck that can be
supported. All trucks a 10' clearance and alO' wide lane. It is assumed that a 6'
spacing exists between trucks' left and wheels. Each bridge should be analyzed
either under the load of a as given in Tables 2.1 and 2.2, or under a
combination of uniform lane and a concentrated load to a truck
as shown in Table 8.2.3.
Two axle trucks
Distance between front and rear wheels: 14'.
H 20-44 (M18): front wheels: lb, rear wheels 32,000 lb
H 15-44 front wheels: 6,000 rear wheels 24,000 lb
H 10-44 (M9): front wheels: 4,000 lb, rear wheels 16,000 lb
'" Three axle trucks
Distance between front and middle wheels: 14'.
Distance between middle and rear wheels: 14' to 30' (use the spacing that ........ r\rlllr·"'C'
maximum
HS 20-44 (MI front wheels: lb, middle wheels 32,000 lb, rear 32,000 lb
HS 15-44 front wheels: 6,000 lb, middle wheels 24,000 rear lb
.. Combination uniform/concentrated load*
LANE LOAD H20-44 and HS20-44 H15-44 and HS15-44 H10-44
Uniform (per 10') 640 lb/ft 480 lb/ft 320 lb/ft
Concentrated for moment 18,000 lb 13,500 lb 9,000 lb
Concentrated for shear 26,000 lb 19,500 lb 13,000 lb
* For the of continuous spans, the lane loading should include an additional
of weight which should be in another span so it
moment. For maximum positive moment one concentrated
np(:T>lt'HJP
Load reduction:
For stresses resulting from three lanes loaded sinmU:alli3otlsly a 90% stress reduction is
permitted. For stresses resulting from four or more lanes simultaneously, a 75%
stress reduction is permitted.
1. of you owner to
are necessary or not?
2.
All names, other than historie, have been ..... "i::' ,..U"..., ......
The stylistic trends housing in Cambridge during this era were quite
complicated and subject to preference. In the first half of the
century the classicizing Greek Revival style was in vogue, but it was
succeeded by the Queen Anne, which favored asymmetrical plans, intricate
plastic massing and roofs. the 1880s two new
curvilinear forms and open
Colonial,
of
2"x6"
See Detail
3rd Floor
Gutter
with a
"", .... "1-..",,,1-.,""'" J.J.J.\.... uJ.vu~.
~- M ..L
Jii ii .Il
-;::: ,,~ --
-
schematic plan view of the the
fl11,'7V'r,t-1f"VI nnru,n/J'", the interior and the walls.
At the request of the owner, I inspected the house, located at 132 Frost Street, in
Cambridge, Massachusetts, on June 6, 1985.
In apartments C, D and E, all on the second floor, there is a visible between the
inside part of the exterior wall and the ceiling as weIl as the inside of the exterior wall
and the interior walls. A tilt of the south exterior wan can aIso observed from the
outside. In addition, thcre is a trace of water damage on thc inside part of the exterior wall
in the apartments of both the first and second floors.
The of the walls be the result of a gutter leak that has allowed water to
penetrate from the exterior of the and reach the structural frame. The structural frame
may thus have been darnaf!;ed.
Since the cannot assessed by visual alone, removal of
parts of the walls and the ceiling the second floor is required. This removal will
alIoVi the inspection of the beams and tÎlted elements, and will help reveaI those rotted
that need Upon these further recommendations will follow
of the house.
reC:OITlmlencled process should start at the earliest convenience of the owner and will
involve extensive construction within the house. Further delay may cause additional
damages to the structural frame of the house.
Alex Entasis
18"
I 2"x 8"
2nd FIoor Ceiling
Section Detail
Exterior
Wall
+--- 10"-+
joined"
CAr'1H",,,,I .. ,
9.5. displacements of the roof with and without the 1" x 2"s
'''''$I,I,r.,tA at different scale).
'-'VjLLH\~'-'LJlH;;:'
to members wall
of the roof frame. The
with these me:mt.ers
that the area
rotted (possibly caused by a water
pulled out, as a re sult the walls of the house had
outwards, leaving a gap of four inches between them and the 1 X 2"s (Fig. 9.4).
fI
The situation struck as an alarming development, but quickly
explained how the most accounted for changes
internally. He suggested that the I" x 2" were not meant to be in
other words, not meant to of the house. were meant to
support the floor of the structural resistance to horizontal
movement was provided by the between the third and
(the bottom section of the
two exterior walls
the I" x 2"s worked as structural . . . . because
V .............. '"'LU
.f·
NODE x-coordinate Y-\,.CUUIUUHUC:
(inches) (inches)
A 0 0
B 308 0
C 45 88
D 263 88
E 65 132
F 243 132
G 154 176
H 120 88
120 156.7
9.2. The of n1.f'n1.1'JP1·S for
The interior walls were from the 'V1"~'V"'''''V''' walls (Figs. 9.3 and 9.4) the
floor only. Thus, the horizontal from wind loading on house were
carried out by the shear action of transverse in the basement
1st floor and the cantilevering the exterior walls in the 2nd floor.
1.
1.1. Attach new members to the ends of the 1!f X 2!1 s in order to elongate them.
These extenders would stretch across the four-inch gap
x and the exterior and would be nailed into the 1" x
and the beam. A or 8!1 piece of wood in each case would thus be
sufficient for the job 9.6).
2"x 8"
2" x 8,,-~~~~1t::!~::::====:::::::=====~==========
unintended by
bolstering occur in n1:-1:-."I"I'"\-n">,an1:-
protection.
likely to corrode
installed in the house
Steel Plate
'----Steel
Plan Detail
4'
Attic
t
7'-4"
3rd Floor
1
Solution 1.4
2.
the same rod or
through the
U.L1JLUJ.Jl5 except in case rods or cable would
be tightened (with double screw threads or a crank) to retract the walls
hold them. steel rods would better serve purpose since they are
more ductile than high-strength cables. J acking up the roof could also be
considered in order to re lieve some of thrust on the exterior wans during
the tightening of the rods (Fig. 9.10). Alternatively, the steel rods could be
heated to expand less force in the
turnbuckles end the
would be eXIJer.leUL:lIJ.}:!, n-,,.0 .... 1"0... 1"o""I:"f"'I,n
3.
rh C'tll .. h.<:l1'~r-""to the would based on a 111rliTn"IA1'l1" that
a structurally dangerous condition.
4'
t
T-4"
1
"""""H-,H~;:;' temporarily the horizontal
he
3.
projects. contractor to use
fTp-r,pr'éll a
device? manager? For an architect?
4. of
",p>f'nn.., 34th
27THiOOR
I I I
SERVI~S _~~[
28THFLOOR
"ENeRA'
NBW DIt-UNG ROOM
I
NBW
OLD K11CHtN :=::J
29THFjOOR TRADEROOM
30TII1°OR PjASEI
PHAS~n
31STFLOOR
EQUITY INVEST.
I \ ~ I
32NDFlOOR
.V~l:'K
GLOV1·-I
1 L
1 I I
CENTRAL KtChl:' 'VIST WS
I I I I
I
rBRARt L~GAL
I
I
I
I I I I I
furniture would
the appropriate
communications.
DEJOLITIdN
JDFJma
I I
c=J LAYOUT
I
ROUGH ELECTRICAL
TEL/DATA WIRINGI
I I
ROUGH PLUMBING
ROJGHHVAc I
I I
ROUGH SPRINCLER
DRryALL I
===:J TAPE & SAND
I I
===:J ~RAME ~EILINqS
f==J INSTALL paaR ~RAMESI
INSTALL LIGHT FIXTURES
FLOORING I I
I====~I==:JPAINTING
o FI~ISH PLUMBING
I I
TILE CEILINGS
1====:::=1==:J MtLLWORK
~
FINISIH HVAC
I I
FINIS1H SPRI~CLER
~~:::J CARPETING
=::::::J IN~TALL~OORS I
~
INYLBASE
I I
CLEANING &
PUNCHLIST
FROSTSTREET
1
David Shrestinian decided to use the
Scheduling and Management System (VSMS) in
chart, each task a project is by a
displayed in two din1ensions. The
the duration of
.lUULJ.'-'(.1Cl'-'J
vertical axis
as the "' .. r
n.rlll .....
2 Patented to Prof. S.N. Pollalis and Y. Ueda by US Patent 5,016,170 of May 14, 1991, this
is presented in: Pollalis, S.N., Computer-Aided Management: A Visllal
"'11"/1"" ([lid Contral Vieweg Verlag, Wiesbaden,
Finally, a template is composed of a quantified bar chart, its folded-up task and
data in a spreadsheet format. A template inherits all the properties of
....J.!-'u......L.LUUC.Lv.L.Lv
shows the first temp late for planning the construction of the 26th floor.
This template was based on the information on the architectural drawing shown
Fig. 10.3, and productivity data available to the construction manager from similar
The temp late was constructed in August, after the design
öllJDIJ[löIU had been completed and design had been reviewed and
Twenty-seven different tasks were identified to be executed on the floor and they
are listed in first column of the temp late , in the order of execution. The second
column shows the quantity of work with each task, as they were
based on the construction drawing. The
rlI'>t''::>r'1'"n1r'I'>rI productivity of a
worker each task is in the third At this early planning
this is a subjective the and the
of
. n r l r r ..... ". ......
1
v..., .. '.... U.L.nl ....' ....U,;:;, the number of available workers per day for each task, shown
in the column of the template 10.4, the duration each task was
calculated and inserted in the column of the template. To the extend that the
calculated duration meets the overall scheduling plans, no further adjustments
were needed at this level. However, if the duration of a would be
long, then an of the of would
to a shorter duration. In any case, "~I~'-'''''''''''''V'''''''''U
project is v"'''.L.LJ.J-''-4.L-v'~.
COlnpj~ete:C1 in every
cannot be measured, quantity of the work that should completed every
working day is given as a of total work of the task. The quantity
work to be day is a very of information for
be data from the
~
~~
"-Ju:J
~ >-::s::;;;:
:;;!~Cl
Cl)
Cl
TASKS ~
;,::>-
Ci)ZZ
Ci)00
Z
gCi) :r:
QTlANTIFTFn BARS
V'''lnl~''lll l:'bK~Ul'4l:'UWbK)
~~
E-<"-J
~....l
B~~ ~>-
:;;!~ ~~
0<:
::S:Cl ~1Ef2i zu O~ 0-<t:
::S:Cl lre t;;Cl tr::Cl 9n 14 21 28 10/5 12 19 26 11/2 9 16 23
9m~!gal
I I I
80 5 16 6% 8/31 I I I I
1 1 1 1
DEMOLISHING N/A N/A 1 1 1 1
1 1 1
UT
1 1
!
LAYOUT N/A N/A 6 2 ., 33 % 9/23 9/25 1 1 rO i
I
1
I
1
1 1 1 !
11,400 Fr2 380FT2 30 6 5 2,280 Fr2 10/ 1 10/7 I ,H- I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
iI
STUD FRAMING
i~
I I
10.000 Fr2 1.250Fr2 8 2 4 2'iOO FT2 10111 10111> I I I
INSULATION I I
I
1 1 1
21,OOOFr2 470FT2 45 9 5 4,230 Fr2 10/13 10/19 I I I I I
I I I I I
I I I I I
I I I I
I I
I
ALUMINIUM 'no FT 83 Fr i 4 2 2 166 Fr 10119 10/20 I
INSERT I FINISH
r:rTI{)N
111 I
I I I
54 Fr 12 4 162FT 10/19 10/?? i
WOOD BASE 6'iOFT
" I
I
1
I
I
i 1
TI
1
11 I
,
I
.
FRAME CEILING 9.600 Fr2 480 Fr2 20 4 'i 1920 FT2 10/19 10/?i i I
I I
! I I I
I I I I
42 3 16 4 4 17, 10/19 10/?? I I I
DOOR FRAMES I I I
I I
LIGHT 15 3 'i 20% 1012" 10nCJ TRATIOl\ 0VEEKE
FIXTURES N/A N/A
I
I
i !
I
I
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 ,8 i 9 10 ,11 12 , 13
DURATION (WEEKS)
electric and
1-'" ............:........
u -'.1. work were scheduled to start. All
works were scheduled to finish at the same time, and gypsum
boards would start a day before completing all the rough works. The of
design and materials for the wood baseboard, the vinyl baseboard3
paint should have been completed during the rough works and the . . . . . . . . u ....u. .............
detail insert4 and the wood base would be executed during taping and sanding
the gypsum' partitions. At same time, the ceiling frame would be suspended
and door frames would installed. The first light fixtures would be installed
the ceiling frame be completed and the floor would be
installing At the beginning the 9th painting
at finish plumbing would completed and
job would have been
VU.LJlJ.L.L.L.LF:,
3 Offices had a vinyl while common areas with intense traffic had a stronger and
wooden baseboard.
nrr\t"'f'1""",
4 The aluminum insert is an architectural detail where an aluminum is to be
inserted in a groove to decorate large areas of walls between doors.
5 these columns could have been filled after the precedent
and the and ending dates and then executing a critica]
algorithm. at this level of complexity, the part of the template is easier
to be constructed first, as a visual display of the process.
1
Although this template was used for early planning, there was a
issue to observe. was a high concentration on the
middle and last of the construction period.
on certain reaching a maximum of 30 workers on ~'~'JAA_'~
Such peaks resulted from the constrained schedule, both by the delay city
permit and the deadline of November 23, for the completion of the construction.
vVJl.L.lIJ.Lv,,'vu. vAov'vlJ" for some millwork and the final inspection and
H-n n
33 % 9/23 9/25
JL 1 1
LAYOUT N/A N/A 6 2 1 Lil 1
STUD FRAMING 11,400 FT2 380 FT2 30 6 2,280 FT2 101 1 101 7 I CITY
1 I
1
11
1 PERMIT 1 1I
I1
N/A N/A 15 5 20 % I 10/ 7 10/13 jin l I1
ROUGH N/A N/A 15 20% 10/ 7 10/13
Hl J:;r1'RTr
TEL/DATA 101 7 10/13 1 1 1
WIRING
N/A N/A 10 2 5 20 % 1 J 1 I nl
ROUGHHVAC N/A N/A 15 5 I 20 % 101 7 10/13
1
1
1
1
1
1 ral !:
N/A N/A 15 5 20 % i
' 10/ 7 10/13
1
1
1
J
J
1
1
1
1
:n l
INSULATION 10.000 FT2 1 250 FT2 2 4 2.500 FT2 10/13 10/16 1 1 1
1 1 1 I
GYPSUM
21,000 FT2 470 FT1 45 5
,
4,230 FT21101l3 110/19
I 1
1
:
l i J
1
I
1 1
: I
BOARD 1 1 1 1
li
1 1
I I I I i I I 1
TAPE & SAND 20,500 FT2 510 FT2 5 4,080 FT2 10/19 lOn4 1 1 1 1 I I 1 1
1 1 I 1 1 1 1 1
I I : : 1 1 1 1
1 I I I I
FRAME CEILING 9,600 FT2 480 FT2 20 I 4 5 1.920 FT2 10/19 10/23 : : : I : I:
DOOR FRAl'vfES 42 3 1 16 4 4 12 10/19 10/22
1
:
1
1
1
1
1
:
1
1
1
I
1
:
1
:I r- i I:
I 1
FTXTTlRFS N/A N/A 15 5 20 % 10/23 10n9 1 1 1 I 1 1 1
1 1 1 I 1 i 1
6 -+ 8
L -_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ I 9 I 101111 12 I 13
DURATION (WEEKS)
I I [
36 4 9 2,280 FT2 11O/2611l! 5
42 7 6 2 3 14 111 9 11/11
N/A N/A 15 3 5 20 %
DURATION (WEEKS)
~
IZ) 1 ~
!t !
QUANTIFIED BARS
I~ I ~~
TASKS (lNTENSITI PERSONPOWER)
LAYOUT
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
-----
--.§-- __L
--- ---- ------ ----
lh
11,400 FT2 6 I I I
I I I I I I I I
STUD FRAMlNG
------- ------ ----- --- --- I I : CITY' I I I I I I
I I I I I I I I
I I : PERMl,T I I I J I J
----- I I I I I I I I I I
ROUGH _J1 __ _L --~-
_1Q.:p__ lQU_ 1il111 I I I I I I I I I
PLUMBlNG N/A N/A I I I ! i flI .. J J I : I I
-gPYGB I I I I I I I I I I
N/A N/A _J1 __ _2- --~- _1Q.:p__ lQC!'" lill1l.
! I
I
I
I
I
I inh I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
in h I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
i
I
I
II
I
i
I
_J2 __ I--_L --~- _1Q.:p__ lOL'!... lill1l.
ROUGH
SPRINKLER N/A N/A I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
J
I inn
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
J
I
I
J
I
J
I
I
I
I
I
lQ,WO_IT2_ 1-,-~ilEI:f. -_.!?_- I--_L --~- 3J1Q.fl:f. lWL4. 1ill1.2
lNSULATION I
I
I
i
I
I
I
I I ril I
I
I
I
I
I : I
J
I
J
I I 1 I I
I1 I
21,OOOFT2 470FT2 45 9 5 j4,230 10/14 10120 I ! I I I
GYPSUM -----1--- --- iI I I I I I
BOARD
------- ------
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ij I
!
I
I
I
I
i
I I
i
J I I
i
I
i
I I
:
__11QJ::I.._ J[U']'__ _ __1-_f--1- __:f._ Ji&.fl_ llWl~ 1il!]..Q
J
ATJTMiNHTM I I I I I I I I I
lNSERT ! I I I I h I I ! I
I I I I I I I I I I
__ _J1-_ _2- __1._ Jg:?'fl _ lW_1L lQl1l.
WOOD BASE _1iiG..EL _~_F!J I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
11 ti
I
h I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
20,500 FT2 510 FT2 40 8 5 4,080 FT2 10/21 10/27 I I I 1 I I I
:I I I
Lil
I I I I I I I I I
TAPE & SAND ------- ------ ------ --- ---- ------ ---- --- I I I I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
iI I
I
I
I
I
I I
I
I
I
I
I
I
i
FRAME CElLlNG 2,§Q.(tIT2_ 1!LO_W_ 1--_..7il_- __:L --~- 121Q.fl:f. lW19_ lil@
I
I
!
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I nl I
I
I
I
I
!
I
I
I
I
I
I
H
I I I I I I I I I I
__1L __ _3____ _ J.Q __ _.1_ __1._ _lL __ lW_L lilUl
DOOR FRAMES
-
I
I
I
I 1
I
I
I
I ""I i
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
;--
_J1 __ _L __~+_lQ.ió__ lGf'f.1L mn'I:(WEEK~) I I n···~· I I I
iI
J
N/A N/A lil8.Q mrJA I I I I I I
FÏiITÛRES I I I I I I I I I
1 I 2 I 3 I 4 I 5 I 6 I 7 I 8 I 9 Î 10 I 11 I 13
DURATION (WEEKS)
1
.. VU.iVJ. .......' " of
~~I i~
Cl '~Ul I'CIlUl
E-<!;;: §g!;;:
CIlCl ",Cl 9/7 14 21 28 10/5 12 19 26 11/2 16
6%
DEMOLISHING N/A i N/A
80
LAYOUT N/A
n
SPRINKLER N/A N/A 1I
INSULATION : Il i~
9yP~l!M 121,000 Fr2 1470 Fr2 45 9 1 110/13 I
IWW i
MINIUM 330 Fr I 83 Fr I 4 2 2 I 166 Fr 110/19 110/20
INSERT 10126T107271
WOOD BASE 3 4 I 162Fr
DOOR FRAMES
~ I~ ~
10 11 12 13
DURATION (WEEKS)
FLOORING
PAINTING
TOTAL
13
SlO STOP ORDER
CIO-l RELOCATE FANCOILS DURATION (WEEKS)
Furthermore, the
the doors and painting should
not been as of 23.
The change orders on the relocation of the fan coils, the thermostat wiring and
insulation the existing ducts had changed the scheduling of rough HV AC
although that task had been completed by date of October 23.
Prom the owner' s however, a meaningful thickness of this line could and
should the resources allocated by the design firm to accomplish the task of
updating That could provide a measure to expedite the process by
establishing a measure of the effort from the in the de~:IgIl-C()nstru,ctHm
process.
the to the tile centers
rough sprinkler also completed the
as such n-t--t-,,,..-.t-.:•
..-!
estÏlnated quantity of work for the stud framing had been ,",V'.U.!-,.1.V'-'vU,
In addition, certain tasks had been planned to start before October 23 had not
started yet. These tasks, not directly related to were: aluminum
insert, ceiling, light
Finally, the wood base delay is attributed to delay of ~v.,'vvL.LVJ.J. the wood
base design as weIl as the change order on secretarial stations.
Despite delays of the renovation, the owner insisted in keeping the initial
deadline of November the duration of the tasks had to be expedited,
overtime work and work on the weekends were considered. that the labor
cost is in the weekends, a graphic display of work vA\.,VULvU.
after regular working hours has been introduced on the control temp late.
HVAC had included worle on Saturday, 17, and on ........ ,J ...... ..,,'4
October 19, in order to with the changes.
TASKS (lNlèN::l1l r
9n 14 28 10/5 12 19 26 11/2 9 16 23
o
~ 1~ ~ :~ '~~
DEMOUSHL"G NIA N/A
80 6% 8/31 9/22 i I i
6 2 3 33 %_ 9/23 9/25 9/25 : : :! APPRn''-T nF
LAYbUT
LAYOUT NIA N/A o Q 0 : : :. _ _ tDELA' 'AP'ROVAl
6 2 3 33 % 9123 9/25 101 ' : : ~
STUD FRAMING
11,400 FT2
2,600 FT2
380 FT2
190 FT2
30
14
...------
8+25+140T
65
2 5
2,280 m JO/lOl
10/ 101 ,
::,: PERJ,,0-..f(T!~
'Y '. ~ SI9
~ ,~I!li!t OVEI[TlME l:
14.000 FT2 320 FT2 44 38+25+140T 6 JO 1.920 FT2 101 6 11/ 7 : (:j--+--i--~tt-:flll~ I
42 3
o
16
25 ----
0
4
5
0
4
S
12
20%
10/6 10/ 9
10/261115
!~ n
DURATION (WEEK.') i : PROPOSE
N/A N/A f---.YO--f--- ______+_"O-t·--0"--1-------+-----11---+---1
45 3 15 7% 10/29 11114 I 2 3 4: S: 6 7 12 13
:;S~t
~~~TION 'Vi
;ilm i
I I I
120.500 Fr2 570 Fr2 36 4 9 '2280Fr2 10/26 111'; JO/IC I I D~LAYO I
-------
I I I
PAlNTING 3,000 Fr2 380 Fr2 8 óS+20T R 1 11/1 11/14 I I
i
23.500 Fr2 420 Fr2 56 48+6S+20T 8 9 3.360 Fr2 11/17 10/29
I
I
I
I !' II
i I I
8 ..------- 4 2 50%
11/
10/28 1012\
I
I
I
1
1
1
1
I
1
1
1
I
I
I
I
I
I
i
I
I
I
N/A
9,600 Fr2
N/A
960 Fr2
0
8
..-------
I
0
4
2
0
2 50 % 11111'1 11114
I L920Fr2 10/30 111 '
I
I
1
1
1
I
I
I
1
1
1
I
in
1
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
E1!
I
i
I
10
0 0
"
0
I
1
1
I I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
!
O~M""" 1 ~fII)Fr2 8 2 4 12,400Fr2 l1/9 11/17 1 !
I
! n h ~ I
38
-------
2S
36+2S
4
7
9
1
6
11%
17%
ll/2 11/12 10110
11/14 11/14
11/ 9 11/1 10129
1~~~~ON'V
I
f:lt~JN
W-
hl
'~
3 33% 1115 11/9
n ~~
12 4
N/A N/A 0
12
------- 0
4
0
:1 33 % 11/11 1111 1
,
n~
1
1
FINISH
SPRINKLER N/A N/A 0 0 0 1
1
I
:I
2 4 25% 111110 11/11
8
..-------
CARPETING
9.340 Fr2
9.340 Fr2
334 FrZ
445
28
0
4
0
5
7
()
4
1L336 Fr2 11/9 11/1
1
1
i
I
I
1'
1I
i H~
1
I
i
INSTALL
42 7 6 ..------- 2 :1 14 111 9 1lI11 10110
~~~TION 'V ~~ttZJtN w- 'HU 'curm 'rnrSH
I
0 0 0
DOORS î'ö"R
42 5 8 2 4 10 11/' 111 10129 1 ' 1 ~ h
-----
LRooFr 300 Fr 6 2 3 600 Fr 11/16 11ll! 1
1
1
1
1 1 I
0 0 0 1 1
~
1 1
2 900 Fr
1.800 Fr 450 Fr 4 2
, I 111 Ii 11/H
1 1
-----
IS :1 20% 11111 1lf2{ I 1 1 1 :
~
I
~h~~1:gt N/A NIA 0 0 0 iI I
1
I
1
1
1
I 1 1
I
15 5 :1 33 % 111 llm I
1/
~O
N/A N/A 516 8/31 1l/2( ~L __
nv""T'fMP, lOT)
SAIUKUAY (~)
~<L __
TOTAL N/A NIA 94 11 'i ~ (SS) ,l
I----,
in the alphanumeric
additional row is inserted between the estimate of the quaritity and the
constructed quantity to display this information. Thus, the constructed quantity
should be equal to the summation of the initially estimated quantity and the
quantity in the change order. If that were not it would imply that the
quantities of work had been estimated
Visual
1 as an
The construction of the 26th floor was a segment of the whole
intended to provide the construction manager with the insight information on
how to schedule and control the renovation an occupied building a busy
downtown area. At the beginning of the project, several issues needed to be
further, including the relationships with the other participants, the
sequencing of the operations, and the meeting of the deadlines
such, the of project, with emphasis on cost
for the Not he had to
but
productivity
guided the project to think a certain way that kept close to the actual
development of the project. Such a focus on productivity had an immediate
impact on the thinking and data collection for the project. The updated
produetivity shown Table 10.1 is a result of sueh an analysis with an immediate
value for scheduling the rest of the floors and allowing the project manager to
build the necessary contingencies in the to follow.
4 Section 10.4 is based on an interview with Dr. and Mr. David Shrestinian.
1
(i.e.,
, the
on the
the visual
and a graphics way to
of a superintendent was
both for visualizing the data
and for collecting the
was not a
...... <l1·f"1r>11'"'\<:lnf"C'
same
productivity was available.
in 1, 34th floor was next
floor was not available at the same time.
34th floor, shown in the architectural drawing in 10.9, was ...,"-'...,............ ,,'"" . . .
three main sections: the Library section, the Management Information "';'uC'rA1'Y'IC'
(MIS) section, and the Legal section. Thus, these three sections should be
L''-'~LU.'''''~ as three different entities .
'-'V ..
FROST
~ ;1
TASKS
!~ !~
\UH""'''UL
J~ ~ ~ 12/14 21 za lJ~ 11 18 25
I
21J 8 15 22
DEMOLISHING N/A N/A 28 I
I
I
I
I
I
iI I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
N/A N/A 4 I I I I I I I I I
LAYOUT I I I I I I I I I
I I I I I I I I I
STUD FRAMING 520FT2 260FT2 2 J J J I I I I I I
I I I I I I I I I
~~~gH
I I I I I I I I
N/A N/A 4 ! I I i I I I I I
i 1 1 1 1
~~ii~~T.ER
1 1 1
N/A N/A 4 I
1
I
I
I
1
1
I
I
1
1
1
I
1
1
I i
GYrSUM
BOARD
UITMTNTTTM
1,040 FT2 350FT2 3 I
I
I
I
!
I
I
I
i ! i I
I
I
I
I
I
i
I
lNSERT 40FT 40FT 1 I
I
i
I
I
I ! i ! I
I
I
I
I
I
~~ I i
NIA N/A 6 I 1 I I I I I
1 1 I I 1 1 I 1 I
PAlNTlNG
FlNlSH
2,430FT2
N/A
270FT2
N/A 2
9
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
i
I
I
!
I
I
I
I
I
[
I
1! I
I
I
PLUMBlNG I I I I I I I I
I I I I I I I .J. I
I I I I I I I I I
MlLLWORK N/A N/A 45 I I I I I I I I I
I I I I I I I I
FlNISHHVAC N/A N/A 4 I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I ! I
I
I
I
I
I
data for rnl'7lètrl.lrtn1 n the tem:vtate scnleaUJ~mf! the renovation of the Library in the 34th floor.
1
employed 67 people
of the company, """ ..,"" .... .1. ... ,,'-' .....
of the bridge
firm was T"T~nu,n state or federal lYA·<TO~·nro(\OT't
number of employees at
for completion the
.I.,U....' U H J ..... ..,
to inc1ude only
and corporate policy
acquisition ('t"'..... a~t·ron""nTc
because of the use of computers.
the support staff was to J..lu.u,...... v
rI""t''\':l~t'ronP'nt-c without increasing
BRIDGE ENGINEERS,
INC.
11
the design and of bridges, roads, airports,
works, sewers, ete. The design is
("'r-r,rn"t",\-:ln,,,,,ri by the preparation of a set ri1"-:lU!11ncrc and specifications to
construct those projects. engineers specialize as structural
bridge transportation
engineers,
, ..u ..........Ul""
the phases
" .......u ..................<.J'""u approval process for a . . . ., . . . . . . . . . . . . .
for a bridge rehabilitation.
n1",'\,,,,,,"r information shows the ".......,. ..n.-.r".......
to complete while a horizontal
Cle,/elcJprnellt of a task ".l.F,U. .I..I..l.V" .u .......... ..." ........... tïme, waiting for
0
0 60 120 180 240 300 480 540 600 660 720 780 840 900
DAYS
Notice to Proceed Date: Agreement Date: Signature:
The
size are
each alternative for the
11
lnc.,
computers and CAD in his v'V>.u!-,,-,,u
the
word processing for ':>"-',"'.LV",",'-'.V"', a in management
ei vil engineering area prompted the
stations in 1988. had their own . . . . . ".. .,..............,>..>
connected to the ... ""1rn",,.. lr
11
of increasing vV~,U.IJ~""'A,~'"
government. While they were not
their aggressive investment in computers
enab1ed to quick1y overtake their competition.
they were able to profit the -'-J.J. ... ''''' ....Jl''-V'"'
other' s work.
'--"~.L.'--'-I--"''''''VÁ
Consultants, lnc. to determine how they
for the long term at the best cost. The updating
task
11
use of
CAD tools and
He felt that models of ......... '. . 1"-. ..,,'-'
and allow his greater freedom in their designs. He also felt this could be
an opportunity to prepare public hearing information that homeowners
businesses would more readily comprehend.
VV~J..lI-I''''''''V.L'''
could provide
'L.I."-'~U~Jl""
personnel supplying
.I..I..I. .... needed .L.U.L.HU-'.V
bridge
bridge rehabilitation
without use of
type a rather small profit margin.
work was not very to engineers, it became
to the company with
VJ..J..'U.uJ.LV idea of work being generated the
use of computers was intriguing to Mr. He began to wonder about
other aspects of the be able to expand in a similar fashion.
11
the
.L",~,
Inc. That
u..L<•••u .
and
of the leading edge of
levels,
• increased utilization of the server for software storage allowing for more cost
effective "floating software licenses" in the future,
• provIsIons remote communications inc1uding and
support and future dedicated phone Hnes,
., additionallaptop computers,
ct of CD ROM' s other
1
ii.U.~.I.""'.V"'"
the development of a
for the University's campus.
not only replacing
resources, and
be made.
1. at
1
.......,..,.,"",... .. 2000, In
to consider the long term physical
.............LU.... Jl ....JL.L ..... LJlVH
1
The originator and leader in the development of the GIS at
Lody Petriv. Ten ago he was employed by
Technology, and on establishing a '"''V ... .o. ....... , .... ...., ...
In a
a cornbined -'--'--'---:'LUJ.-'--'-.LJlfo'.,
In . . .v •.n ......" ...... to launch the GIS .... rr"'A{~t several technical
!". to be addressed.
Those issues centered on hardware and software requirements. The
considered the scale planning taal, therefore they researched
geographic that would enable inquiries to done on a
AutoCAD®2 was chosen as most appropriate environment for ~~~"'AU."",
the maps and of in the system. Oracle®, was,""V.lVV'"VU
in the Planning
.... n1~n""' .. IT could he used to enter and . . . . . r.na,,,,,
1
After a year of campus a
pilot project was was to construct a map the
campus, as a to data 1). An was hired
to maps of campus and convert them to format. The
was used the Group to link the
map to data obtained from the Project 2000 and stored in an Oracle®
That first step was completed one year. The map that was
created during this process was useful for athematic mapping but the inaccuracy
of the original hand to be an obstacle when more
detailed work was ...nr""",,., .. ,,,,r1
2 by Sausalito, California.
3 Random Access Memory.
in the campus to nwps
A detail of the new map.
The development of a higher quality map required a greater investment by the
University, beyond the immediate co st computers. The University responded
positively to to with preparation of the
needed maps. Fifteen control identifiable by bronze markers and set in
cçmcrete, were installed at of the campus to enable accurate surveys
to be linked control stations
~'-',,, System, and they
.........ULO... " ' " '
information. map,
only by the data available and the
.u..u ....... ...,· ....
There was a strong interest among the U sers Group in representing all the campus
building floor plans in CAD, as base drawings for facilities n1anagement and space
planning, so it created a spin-off endeavor. The Planning Group had a library for
storing "as-built" drawings of campus buildings. Working in that light, the
Planning Group established a library of computerized floor plans .. Thus,
Group could pro vide support for initial CAD users, and a
.LUeUA.UA"Lb floor plan
building, if for them to use. In return Group
r'l't",nnrt and establish of .l.U~JlV.U.
.U.l.l.'Vl.l.J.
in
LlU.I..L .... .I.'l.l.F,'"
89 90 91 92 93 94
I·· {
'.
I I I I I
IIRSl MEETING AT ~SG
A A A
USERGROUP I .. :',:: .....: . . ,
I
l lRST CtD CAPABILITY
PROTOTYPE I··., '. .., j
I
NETWORKING I
1
The overall campus map has broader uses. The long range is to put the GIS
maps on a University wide network, by many users 12.7). Then,
individu al departments could attach their own data to the by the
to tabular information. As an the
rloln"..,·t"n-.ont could own data base to those Data could include
IJ .....'" ...,,'"-'... ,::.,of A user
OIJU\-• ....,;), u.uv'-' ........ J.\J" .. " pLU.n.. J.!.''::''
spaces people
as a
recommendations
could be generated at any
development in the 1900-1909 period.
shown in gray prior to 1900. Buildings shown in
black were constructed or acquired between 1900 1909.
NON-ASSIGNA8LE AREAS
"-;--,-, _ ..
"--.----"- - "
1
Cast Recovery
..LH'. U'.'""',,",, is to v ........ "" ................ ....,
1
As 1993, software consisted of AutoCAD® v.
GEO/SQL®, v.3.1b, while a few 486 platforms at 66
The original Arche 486/33 was still used as the
The were up on Bernoulli
SAUSALlTO. Calif.- AutoCAD Data Extension (ADE) may be the ultimate data
tooI. Based on the Anaheim teehnology demonstrated by Autodesk A/E/C
n .. }'·,-; ....' n ...~Kn '93, the software allows users to manage and reuse information stored in
CAD drawings aeross files and outside databases. ADE runs under AutoCAD
Release 12 and is with drawings ereated in releases 11 and 12. MOl director
Blair LaCorte said the product takes the trend of task automation to the next level, which
is the proeess automation. "For 10 years have been and data.
This data is valuable and now the it. They not
want to create and reuse the data they
" he said.
ADE allows users to access and combine drawing data from AutoCAD r1r~l""llnlT ....,"'lIU....,"',
attributes and extern al databases. "With this product we've made it easy to access
three forms of infonnation simultaneously, so that you can up the data
and on single attribute you could have in LaCorte The
C'At:tnl<lr",.'" access multiple drawings allows users to open and work on any number of
AutoCAD drawings as if they were one virtual Data ean be accessed from
several different drawings in a operation opening and
individual drawings because searches are global. The program also updates ll'Uln,!I-"'-'
drawings at once.
When an ADE open command is
index for the based on lOc:atl.on
ADE activates the accessed across
The search through
amounts of data. stores data in minimizes system
ria,,,. .. ,,,rie>i";n ... and increases user productivity, LaCorte said. data subsets allow users
to at or retrieve only the precise data in which they are interested.
de~ngJner and drafter a drawing and the inc1udes sidewalks,
tnr.r.lr'lTu and or she only needs to know where the sewer and
up part of the drawing. So, instead of on a 3-
working on 100- KB and that is easy to work with and
SmlpllIH~S the command through the use of
U sers search criteria elieking on
lOcanon, AutoCAD extended data or
the ADE query eommand, users can attach to outside databases without knowing
"We recognize that would use ADE is a person who wants to manage and
rnanipulate data. We're it as easy and as transparent as to get to the
information. A user doesn't have to eonneet to outside databases, the software can
be used for that," LaCorte said.
In addition to its multiple file and database ADE also aUows multu)le-'USI3r
to The software allows users to and write to the same r1 .. ~"u'n(T
simultaneously, but prevents overwrites and unauthorized
entity locking and
THE
THE PAVIUON
Licisco,
<:llYT.:ltTO<:ltn i Ponti di Palladio. Electa 1980.
Palladio, Andrea, The Four Books of Architecture. New Y ork: Dover
Publications, 1965.
,nrU'CTlr. Le ei Andrea Palladio. Pozza
Clyde
SciencelEngineering
........ 'n.u ...''V Examiner, May 27,
p.12.
Engineering, Cainbridge,
1980.
JLI.L.LJ"-,u•.L•..,V.l. •. .L.LA' May 1987,
1987.
True the Design and Construction of
Simon and Schuster, 1986.
AT HARVARD UNIVERSITY
lannznf!.' Inventory, Policies and
Office.
UI"nn"nrr
by
THE
5.1.
1.
1990.
Fig. 5.12-20. Construction photographs. Dragados y Construcciones.
1991-April1992.
6.11-17.
6.1
Fig. 6.22.
THE '-A'-"L.LJ;'-'
7.1.
Fig.
Fig. 7.10.
1. Bridge,
Fig. 7.15.
Francisco Public Library.
7.17. p.
11, p. 73.
8.3. Magagnato, p. 24.
Fig. 8.4. p. 32.
30.
Fig. 8.6. 6,p. 68.
8.7. Third Book, plate 2, p.
ATHARVARD
All were Planning Group.
Selected U.S. Customary their Technical
Case Studies
Management and Technology
in the Design Process
ISBN 90-5269-138-X