Professional Documents
Culture Documents
232
The research climate was chilled due to the slicing of the NEH budget. There
was a significant reduction and even partial elimination of congressional
appropriations for many federal agency historical offices, which was resulting
in the eradication of many cultural resource jobs. Regardless of the fact that
there were ever-increasing visitor numbers, Congress crippled the funding for
our national museums, including those interpreting cultural history.
Meanwhile, out in the hinterland, federal and state agency preservation officials (particularly in the western states) were encountering incidents of noncompliance, deliberate civilian obstruction, and, on occasion, physical threats
as they went about their charge. I felt that Public Archaeology offered an
important opportunity to advance a value cultural resources position
within this cultural climate. I sought an interpretive archaeology position that
could address public sentiment toward history and historical resources that
operated at a grass roots level.
I found one such opportunity in a program run by George Brauer, Director
of the Center for Archaeology in the Baltimore County Public Schools
[CFA/BCPS]. His program of archaeology education operates in the 22nd
largest US public school district with 160 schools, 5,000 teachers, and
109,500 students in grades K-12. (For overviews of this program see Brauer,
1995, 1999, 2000, 2004; Jeppson, 2000; Jeppson and Brauer 2000, 2003; and
the CFA/BCPS web page archived at www.p-j.net/pjeppson/or). What follows
here reports some of what I learned at the Center for Archaeology/BCPS
between 1998 and 2002 while co-supervising field practicums, co-presenting
classroom-based programing, and co-writing archaeology-enriched curriculum exercises.
What is discussed here involves revelations that may be quite obvious to
some but these observations share some of what I think the Baltimore
County Public Schools has to teach archaeologists as they attempt in their
interpretation efforts to Give The Public Its Due (Jameson, 2000: 71). The
archaeology as education example offered here argues for an engaged
approach to public outreach that emphasizes social commitment rather than
strictly professional needs alone (Pyburn and Wilk, 1995; Jeppson 1997,
2000, 2001, 2003, 2004a, b, [2007]; Downum and Price, 1999; Watkins et al.,
2000; Zimmerman, 2000).
233
234
235
for the past might be more successfully addressed under a strategy where
archaeology operates not for archaeologys needs but alternatively, when
archaeologys needs meet the needs of the public.
236
237
238
recognize nor appreciate this expertise (Jeppson, 2000, 2003, 2004a, b [2007]).
When archaeologists undertake lesson plan development on their own they
are not just practicing outside their field of preparation but also, effectively,
practicing education without a license.
239
240
results into their various components and links these clearly and directly to
the instructional skills the teacher is using. This means, for example, making
obvious where and how portions of a specific archaeology activity meet
such instructional goals as establishing an orderly pattern to student thought
from concrete to abstract principals, developing visual perception, requiring
adding and subtracting of numbers, and practice at making estimations.
Supporting the third grade archaeology unit is a curriculum-matched television program, The Adventures of Indiana Joe and the Secret of Oregon
Ridge, which is produced by the School Districts cable television station
(CFA/BCPS, 2000d). This instructional program reviews information taught
as part of the archaeology unit (Figure 15.1). The program includes a short
drama skit and then a live or taped class interaction component where
students from selected schools interact with the Center for Archaeology
Director (Social Studies Curriculum Specialist George Brauer) Indiana Joe
through a telephone link-up. The program is broadcast repeatedly (for several
weeks) during the period of the school year that the archaeology enriched
FIGURE 15.1. Baltimore County Public Schools cable television program schedule.
Inset: Broadcast still showing Center for Archaeology Director George Brauer (left)
instructing treasure-hunter Indiana Joe (right)and the Grade 3 classrooms tuned
inabout how the value of artifacts lies in what they can teach about the past.
(Courtesy, Baltimore County Public Schools, Towson, Maryland.)
241
FIGURE 15.2. Third Graders learn about spatial perception and practice map skills
used in annual standardized testing while taking field notes at a simulated site with
prehistoric and historic components. Center for Archaeology/Baltimore County
Public Schools, Towson, Maryland. (Photo by P. L. Jeppson, 2000.)
242
243
FIGURE 15.3. As part of In-Service training, teachers identify Social Studies skills
utilized during archaeological fieldwork. (Courtesy, Office of Social Studies, Baltimore
County Public Schools, Towson, Maryland.)
244
245
spectrum of possibilities to expand upon the archaeological mandate to disseminate archaeological information. Both are uniquely qualified to interpret
the past and both have a social and ethical obligation to engage the public in
their work. When materials or programs are available, or can be created, which
allow the incorporation of archaeological information into classroom or field
trip activities, both education and archaeological goals can be advanced.
Some may caution that in todays educational climate with its demands for
curriculum standardization, comprehensive assessment, and funding
accountability that schools may not be amenable to revising their essential
curriculum to include archaeology. My experience as a curriculum specialist
tells me that nothing could be further from the truth. Teachers and curriculum writers are on a perpetual quest, seeking ways to motivate and engage
students and to energize their curriculum. In the opinion of many of my
education colleagues, no curricular innovation has more potential for
meeting these needs than does the field of archaeology with its hands-on
elegance and profound demand for imaginative, reflective, and creative
thinking. Obtaining a more central role for archaeology as a part of teacher
instruction and student learning is possible. It can and should be done.
246
References
Baltimore County Public Schools, Office of Social Studies (OSS/BCPS), 1993,
Exploring Environments, Baltimore and Beyond: Integrated Science/Social Studies
Guide for Grade 3. Educational Support Services, Office of Social Studies,
Baltimore County Public Schools, Towson, MD.
Brauer, G.H., 1995, Archaeology as Social Studies Content in the Baltimore County
Public Schools. Presentation at the 75th National Council for the Social Studies
Conference, Phoenix, AZ.
Brauer, G.H., 1999, Archaeology in the Social Studies Curriculum. Presentation at the
79th National Council of the Social Studies Conference, Los Angeles.
Brauer, G.H., 2000, Public Archaeology at Oregon Ridge: It Can be Done. Paper
Presented at the 33rd Conference on Historical and Underwater Archaeology,
Quebec City, Canada.
Brauer, G.H., 2004, Archaeology and Critical Thinking. Pre-Conference Clinic Presented
at the 84th National Council for the Social Studies Conference, Baltimore, MD.
Center for Archaeology/Baltimore County Public Schools (CFA/BCPS), 1997, Using
Clues from the Past: Performance Assessment Activity, Grade 3 Social Studies,
Revised from 1996 edition. Educational Support Services, Office of Social Studies,
Baltimore County Public Schools, Towson, MD.
Center for Archaeology/Baltimore County Public Schools (CFA/BCPS), 1999, PreVisit Student Activity Packet for Grade 3 Social Studies Archaeology Unit.
247
248
Jeppson, P.L., 2004a, Pitfalls, Pratfalls and Pragmatism in Public Archaeology: A Case
Study. In Interpretation for Archeologists: A Guide to Increasing Knowledge, Skills,
and Abilities, Archeology and Ethnography Program, edited by T.S. Moyer, H.A.
Hembrey, and B.J. Little. National Park Service, Washington, DC; http://www.
cr.nps.gov/aad/ifora/ and http://www.cr.nps.gov/aad/IforA/respon3.htm.
Jeppson, P.L., 2004b, Doing Our Homework: Rethinking the Goals and
Responsibilities of Archaeology Outreach to Schools. Paper presented at the
Conference on Historical and Underwater Archaeology, St. Louis, MO.
Jeppson, P.L. [2007] Doing Our Homework: Reconsidering What Archaeology Has to
offer the Community of Schools. In Changing the World with Archaeology: Activist
Archaeology, edited by J. Stottman University of Florida Press.
Jeppson, P.L. and Brauer, G., 2003, Hey, Did You Hear About the Teacher Who
Took the Class Out to Dig a Site?: Some Common Misconceptions About
Archaeology in Schools. In Archaeologists and Local Communities: Partners in
Exploring the Past, edited by L. Derry and M. Malloy, pp. 7796. Society for
American Archaeology Press. Washington, DC.
Jeppson, P.L., Brauer, G. and Levin, J., 2000, Center for Archaeology/Baltimore County
Public Schools [CFA/BCPS], web page archived at <www.p-j.net/pjeppson/or>
Levinson, B.A., 1999, Resituating the Place of Educational Discourse in
Anthropology. American Anthropology 101(3): 594604.
National Council for the Social Studies (NCSS), 1992, Expectations of Excellence:
Curriculum Standards for Social Studies. <http:www.ncss.org/about/background.
html>, Washington, D.C.
National Center of Education Statistics (NCES), 2000, Projection of Education
Statistics to 2010. National Council for Education Statistics, Washington, DC.
Pyburn, K.A. and Wilk, R.R., 1995, Responsible Archaeology is Applied
Anthropology. In Ethics in American Archaeology: Challenges for the 1990s, edited
by Mark J. Lynott and Alison Wylie, pp. 7176. Special Report. Society for
American Archaeology, Washington, DC.
Smardz, K. and Smith, S.J., editors, 2000, The Archaeology Education Handbook:
Sharing the Past with Kids. The Society for American Archaeology Press,
Washington, DC, and Alta Mira Press, Walnut Creek CA.
Smith, S.J., Moe, J., Letts, K. and Paterson, D., 1992, Intrigue of the Past:
Investigating Archaeology, a Teachers Activity Guide for Fourth Through Seventh
Grades. Bureau of Land Management, Salt Lake City.
Stone, P.G., 1997, Presenting the Past: a Framework for Discussion. In Presenting
Archaeology to the Public: Digging for Truths, edited by Jameson, J.H., Jr.,
pp. 2334. Altamira Press, Walnut Creek, CA.
Stone, P.G. and MacKenzie, R., editors, 1990, The Excluded Past: Archaeology in
Education. Unwin Hyman, Routledge, London.
Watkins, J., Anne Pyburn, K. and Cressey, P., 2000, Community Relations: What the
Practicing Archaeologist Needs to Know to Work Effectively with Local
Communities. In Teaching Archaeology in the Twenty-first Century, edited by
S. Bender and G. Smith, pp. 7382. Society for American Archaeology Press,
Washington, DC.
Zimmerman, L., 2000, Regaining Our Nerve: Ethics, Values, and the Transformation of
Archaeology. In Ethics in American archaeology, edited by M.J. Lynott and A. Wylie,
pp. 7174. Second revision. Society for American Archaeology Press, Washington, DC.