Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Faculty
Introduction
1This study was supported by a Teagasc-University Grant to A.
D. Fisher and a European Union AIR Grant to M. E. Alonso de la
Varga. The authors thank C. Morrison and P. Swift of CIBA-GEIGY
Ltd. (Switzerland) for supply of the HSA-GnRH conjugate. We
acknowledge the help of the late K. Bannon (Teagasc, Grange) for
care and handling of the animals, D. Prendiville (Teagasc, Grange),
and M. Duane (University College Dublin) for technical assistance,
D. Harrington (Teagasc, Dublin) for advice on statistical analyses,
and M. Smith (Teagasc, Grange) for typing the manuscript. We
dedicate this paper to the memory of Kevin Bannon.
2To whom correspondence should be addressed.
3Current address: Intervet International bv, P.O. Box 31,
5830AA Boxmeer, The Netherlands.
Received January 26, 1996.
Accepted June 7, 1996.
2336
2337
2338
FISHER ET AL.
Cortisol. Plasma cortisol concentrations were determined using a commercially available RIA kit (CortiCote, Becton Dickinson Immunodiagnostics, Orangeburg, NY), adapted and validated for bovine plasma
in our laboratory. Human serum standards were
diluted in buffer (PBS + .125% BSA, .93% EDTA, and
.1% sodium azide; pH 7.2), and 25 mL of standard,
control, or unknown sample pipetted into anti-cortisol
antibody-coated tubes. Five hundred microliters of
125I-labeled cortisol tracer (approximately 30,000
cpm) was then added before incubation for 45 min at
37C. Tubes were decanted, washed once with 1 mL of
distilled water, and counted for 2 min in a gamma
counter. Parallelism between the standard and
unknown samples was demonstrated by using increasing aliquots of a bovine plasma sample: the concentrations (corrected for volume) measured in 5, 10, 15, 20,
and 25 mL aliquots were 34.6, 30.5, 30.8, 30.4, and
31.7 ng cortisol/mL plasma, respectively. Mean recovery of added cortisol (soluble hydrocortisone sodium
succinate) to bovine plasma was 98%, and the
sensitivity of the assay was .6 ng/mL. The stated
cross-reactivity of the anti-cortisol antibody with
corticosterone, cortisone, dexamethasone, prednisolone, and prednisone was 1.2, .8, .8, 94.1, and 1.2%,
respectively. The intraassay CV ( n = 6 ) for samples
containing 5.5, 28.1, and 69.2 ng of cortisol/mL,
respectively, were 9.3, 5.5, and 4.5%, and the interassay CV ( n = 12) for the same samples were 12.9, 4.9,
and 5.0%. For each calf, the mean cortisol concentration was calculated for the periods 2 to 0, .25 to 1.5, 2
to 6, and 8 to 24 h relative to treatment. The peak
post-treatment cortisol concentration was recorded
and the area (ngmL 1h) under the cortisol vs time
curve above pre-treatment baseline from 0 to 10 h was
measured using a commercially available computerbased software package (GraphPad, ISI Software,
Philadelphia, PA).
Table 1. The effect of no treatment (CON), administration of a human serum albumin-GnRH conjugate in
DEAE-dextran adjuvant (HSA-GnRH), burdizzo castration without (BURD) or with (BURD + LA) local
anesthetic administration, surgical castration without (SURG) or with (SURG + LA) local anesthetic
administration, or local anesthetic administration alone (LAA) on mean and peak plasma
cortisol concentrations and area under the cortisol response curve in bull calvesa
Treatment
Item
Mean plasma cortisol, ng/mL
2 to 0 h
.25 to 1.5 h
2 to 6 h
8 to 24 h
48 h
72 h
Peak plasma cortisol, ng/mL
Area under cortisol curve, ngmL1h
0 to 10 h
CON
HSA-GnRH
BURD
BURD + LA
SURG
SURG + LA
LAA
7.4
5.0b
5.3b
5.7
2.7b
2.6
7.0
8.9bc
12.5cd
9.3
3.8b
2.7
5.5
22.6e
8.2bc
8.9
4.7b
2.5
7.3
14.7cd
11.0bcd
8.3
9.7c
5.4
8.7
30.9f
21.7e
7.1
4.9b
7.0
8.8
19.7de
17.3de
10.5
2.7b
3.5
14.6b
23.0bc
31.4cd
26.5cd
46.0e
35.4d
15.1b
3.11
5.7b
48.9cd
46.4bcd
40.3bcd
105.6e
82.4de
18.2bc
14.55
6.5
4.9b
7.4bc
6.2
2.9b
2.2
SEM
1.20
2.16
2.37
1.45
1.43
1.62
2339
Figure 1. Mean SE cortisol concentrations of bull calves left untreated (CON), administered a human serum
albumin-GnRH conjugate in DEAE-dextran adjuvant (HSA-GnRH), castrated using a burdizzo (BURD), castrated
using a burdizzo following local anesthetic administration (BURD + LA), surgically castrated (SURG), surgically
castrated following local anesthetic administration (SURG + LA), or administered local anesthetic alone (LAA).
2340
FISHER ET AL.
Figure 2. Scrotal circumference of bull calves left untreated (CON), administered a human serum albumin-GnRH
conjugate in DEAE-dextran adjuvant (HSA-GnRH), castrated using a burdizzo (BURD), castrated using a burdizzo
following local anesthetic administration (BURD + LA), or administered local anesthetic alone (LAA). *Within day,
value differs (P < .05) from CON value.
2341
Table 2. The effect of no treatment (CON), administration of a human serum albumin-GnRH conjugate in
DEAE-dextran adjuvant (HSA-GnRH), burdizzo castration without (BURD) or with (BURD + LA) local
anesthetic administration, surgical castration without (SURG) or with (SURG + LA) local anesthetic
administration, or local anesthetic administration alone (LAA) on ADFI and ADG in bull calvesa
Treatment
Item
CON
HSA-GnRH
BURD
BURD + LA
SURG
ADFI, kg
5 to 0 d
1 to 5 d
6 to 10 d
11 to 15 d
16 to 20 d
1 to 20 d
3.93
3.92cd
4.36e
4.31
4.56
4.30
3.70
3.53bc
4.31de
4.39
4.69
4.23
4.18
3.40b
4.16cde
4.16
4.68
4.11
3.68
3.41b
4.01c
4.40
4.67
4.13
4.13
3.67bcd
3.74b
4.42
4.79
4.17
ADG, kg
7 to 1 d
0 to 7 d
8 to 14 d
15 to 21 d
22 to 35 d
0 to 35 d
1.18
.54e
.78
1.62cd
.72
.85bc
.85
.47de
.85
1.68cd
.93
1.00c
1.09
.41de
.85
1.06b
.95
.87bc
1.08
.01cd
.92
1.43bcd
.95
.86bc
1.09
.83b
1.20
1.23bc
.83
.61a
SURG + LA
LAA
SEM
3.86
3.54bc
4.05cd
4.47
4.74
4.21
3.98
3.97d
4.17cde
4.29
4.73
4.32
.165
.145
.096
.167
.124
.100
.77
.24c
1.11
1.92d
.74
.81b
1.08
.63e
.50
1.77cd
.73
.83b
.179
.175
.249
.192
.101
.052
Discussion
Castration by burdizzo or surgical methods caused
a rapid increase in plasma cortisol, which remained
elevated for up to 8 h following castration. An increase
in plasma cortisol following castration is consistent
with the results of other research. Cohen et al. (1990)
recorded increased plasma cortisol at 3 and 6 h posttreatment in surgically castrated Holstein calves.
Serum cortisol was elevated 3 and 7 d after surgical
castration of 6- to 9-mo-old crossbred cattle (Faulkner
et al., 1992), and Johnston and Buckland (1976)
recorded increased plasma corticoid concentrations 15
min, 24 h, and 48 h after castration and dehorning of
4-mo-old cattle. The return of cortisol concentrations
to control values by the 8- to 24-h period following
either burdizzo or surgical castration in the present
study is probably due to the calves having been
handled from an early age and being younger than
those of Faulkner et al. (1992). Robertson et al.
(1994), in an experiment examining the cortisol
2342
FISHER ET AL.
Implications
Castration causes reductions in feed intake and
growth that persist beyond the duration of cortisol
elevation, indicating that such performance measurements are useful additional measurements to stressrelated hormone concentrations in evaluating the
stress response of cattle to this procedure. Shortacting local anesthetics have a role in reducing or
removing any acute pain associated with castration
but seem to be less effective at alleviating the overall
stress response as measured by plasma cortisol.
Literature Cited
Adams, T. E., and B. M. Adams. 1992. Feedlot performance of steers
and bulls actively immunized against gonadotropin-releasing
hormone. J. Anim. Sci. 70:1691.
Alam, M.G.S., and H. Dobson. 1986. Effect of various veterinary
procedures on plasma concentrations of cortisol, luteinising
hormone and prostaglandin F2a metabolite in the cow. Vet.
Rec. 118:7.
Appleby, M. C. 1986. Development of sexual and agonistic behaviour
in bulls and steers. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 15:190 (Abstr.).
Chase, C. C., Jr., R. E. Larsen, R. D. Randel, A. C. Hammond, and
E. L. Adams. 1995. Plasma cortisol and white blood cell
responses in different breeds of bulls: A comparison of two
methods of castration. J. Anim. Sci. 73:975.
Cohen, R.D.H., B. D. King, L. R. Thomas, and E. D. Janzen. 1990.
Efficacy and stress of chemical versus surgical castration of
cattle. Can. J. Anim. Sci. 70:1063.
Consortium. 1988. Guide for the Care and Use of Agricultural
Animals in Agricultural Research and Teaching. Consortium
for Developing a Guide for the Care and Use of Agricultural
Animals in Agricultural Research and Teaching, Champaign,
IL.
Duncan, I.J.H. 1974. A scientific assessment of welfare. Proc. Br.
Soc. Anim. Prod. 3:9.
Faulkner, D. B., T. Eurell, W. J. Tranquilli, R. S. Ott, M. W. Ohl, G.
F. Cmarik, and G. Zinn. 1992. Performance and health of
weanling bulls after butorphanol and xylazine administration
at castration. J. Anim. Sci. 70:2970.
Fell, L. R., R. Wells, and D. A. Shutt. 1986. Stress in calves castrated surgically or by the application of rubber rings. Aust.
Vet. J. 63:16.
Field, R. A. 1971. Effect of castration on meat quality and quantity.
J. Anim. Sci. 32:849.
Finnerty, M., W. J. Enright, C. A. Morrison, and J. F. Roche. 1994.
Immunization of bull calves with a GnRH analogue-human
serum albumin conjugate: Effect of conjugate dose, type of
adjuvant and booster interval on immune, endocrine, testicular
and growth responses. J. Reprod. Fertil. 101:333.
Grandin, T. 1993. Handling and welfare of livestock in slaughter
plants. In: T. Grandin (Ed.) Livestock Handling and Transport. p 289. CAB International, Wallingford, U.K.
2343