Professional Documents
Culture Documents
I.
INTRODUCTION
Jan Izykowski
Wroclaw University of Technology
Wroclaw, Poland
jan .izykowski@pwr.wroc.pl
SY.
TEMA
CTSA
FA
i
i
150
---j"-----tr----j-------t-------i-------j--------i------t------j--------[------
100
Inductive!
50
'-'
iii
iii i
iii
----~--------f+----j-------+-------f-------j--------f-------i-------j--------f-----~-~~~-~--~-~-~-~-~-~-
-100
-150
(1)
where:
XCXL
XC-XL
132
133
~
=vXZ'
413~cos2(1t-a)
,
1tXL
XC - series capacitors reactance,
XL - reactor reactance,
CL - firing angle.
In the impedance compensation mode the TCSC maintains
the maximum rated compensating reactance at any line
current up to its rated maximum. For this mode the TCSC
thyristor controlled reactor and capacitor are chosen so that at
the CLclim the maximum capacitive reactance can be
maintained at and below the maximum line current rating.
The two types of voltages compensation modes are
capacitive and inductive. In capacitive voltage compensation
mode the minimum delay angle CLclim sets the limit for the
maximum compensating voltage up and until the line current
reaches such a value that voltage across the capacitors is a
maximum.
=
ii
i i iii
i i
S;eady ~ Stat~ Oper~ting Point '-------L----L----
----L-----U!, !, II !, !, '"
----+-------H-----J-------+-----
ii
!_l
!_________
,-------j-----
'"
Cap~Cltlve,
'
----~------
170 175
180
(2)
where:
n - index denoting the current sample of the processed
current,
Ts - sampling period.
iph (n )
.int ,( )
i filter. (n)
Digital lph
n Filterin~ for ph
integration =;---.. derejec ion ----,
_____J
,------___________________________________J
II
I
I
IL
r-
._
I iD(n),
Fuzzification
+_ Difference
I..
'.
current
Setting
Jl(iD(n))
Fuzzy
Comparison
Decision
Fig. 4. Schematic diagram of fuzzy logic based detection offault position.
----------t---------------l------------t--------------t--
OJ)
.S
~ 0.8
""0
!!
.-1..__ _..
_. 1
~0.6 _-_tj_-__[
.g
o
i l l
. . +-_..__.+.. . ._-+._-_ .
--------t--------------t----------l-------------~--l-----t-
0.4 _tj
0.
.a~
0)
i,
_.1
~l : + ::
_-_+1---
!
i Setting
---J------~-------------~-------------+-- --------
_t......_...
i..........
...._..j...._..
-.1 _ .
-..A.",,' .F_1
48
36
i
50
52
54
O (A)
-filter,
l ph
l ph
(n) =
1 N-1.
TABLE 1
t
i'~ '(n - k)
N k=O P
(3)
where:
N - number of samples in the single fundamental frequency
cycle.
Then, the difference current is calculated:
. (n) = l.inL()
(4)
10
h n - l.fiIter.(
h
n)
p
Equivalent system
at terminal A (q>=OO)
~ISA
(0.656+j7.5) n
~OSA
(1.l67+j 1l.25) n
Equivalent system
at terminal B
~ISB
(1.31+jI5) n
~OSB
(2.33+j26.6)o
~;L
(0.028+j0.315) O/km
Z~L
C;L
13.0 nF/km
C~L
8.5nF/km
Series capacitors
Position of
thecomnensatinz bank
TCR inductance
P
0.70 X 1L
(q>= -W)
w=-
LineAB
Series compensation
MOY characteristic:
i MOV
(5)
FI
where:
F - area below the membership function IlUO) ,
F, - area obtained from F by limiting it with the applied
setting (Fig. 5).
If the ratio (5) exceeds the specified threshold, the decision
is taken that a fault is in front of the compensating bank.
IV. ATP-EMTP ANO MATLAB EYALUATION
The presented algorithm for detecting the position of the
fault with respect to the compensating bank, in terms whether
a fault occurred in front or behind the bank, has been tested
and evaluated with the fault data obtained from versatile
ATP-EMTP [14] simulations of faults in the test power
network. Basic parameters are gathered in Table I.
The test power network contains the 400 kV, 300 km
=p(~J
V
REF
Line length
System voltage
VREF
q
0.5p.u.
50mH
I kA
150kY
23
300km
400kY
distance to fault - 17 values: 30, 40, 45, 50, 60, 90, 120,
149,151,180,210,240,250,255,260,270,290 [km],
fault resistance:
for faults L-E and L-L-E - 5 values: 0.1, 5, 10, 25,
50 [11],
for faults L-L, L-L-L (L-L-L-E) - 5 values: 0.1, 0.5, 1,
2,5[11],
,J ,'\
,
-- ,..., , \ /
,
"
,
,, 'n ,1\, f\
int
100 'ph--
8
~
::'"
~
u=
h, I'\..
V
If).,
'J
"
--
"ph
100 filter.
ph
I
-6
.-
,,'
,
:
,,
0.04
0.06
,
iph .......
~
u=
,
,,'", ~.,"" , ,
, I, \\, ,: \\
\\ 1/ , " ,
'/
,
i \ ,: , ,' , ,: ,
, ,, ,, ,, , ,
\
r-,
<;
~\)
~,
1\
-2
,,'
\. \
, , , , 'I ,, ,
, ,, ,,
,, ~
\
,-'
-6 0
0.02
0.04
0.06
0.08
0.1
0.12 0.14 0.16
Time (s)
Fig. 7. Signals of fuzzy logic based detection of fault position : Example 2 fault behind compensating bank (fault Fa).
r-----,-------,--------,---,--------,-------,----~----=
80
$
,'!l
60
u=
0)
40
0.02
100 iint.
ph
, ,,
,, , ,I
! ..~I
-2
r: ',," ,
\)
0.08
0.1
0.12
0.14
0.16
Time (s)
Fig. 6. Signals of fuzzy logic based detection of fault position: Example I fault in front of compensating bank (fault FA),
Ci 20
ol....-_.l...-_..L...-_.......
o 0.02 0.04 0.06
_~
___I.__
0.08
0.1
Time (s)
___.L_
0.12
___.L_
___J
0.14
0.16
Number
of fault
cases
Detection
of faults FA
[%]
Detection
of faults FB
[%]
Average
time
of detection
[ms]
10200
83
95
27
10200
84
99
24
10200
85
97
26
[2]
10200
87
99
23
[3]
V.
CONCLUSIONS
[4]
[5]
[6]
[7]
[8]
[9]
[10]
[11]
[12]
[13]
[14]
[15]
[16]