Professional Documents
Culture Documents
SOURCE
INTENSITY
MAGNITUDE
Magnitude is a quantitative measure of earthquake size
and fault dimensions.
It is therefore an instrumental, quantitative and objective
scale.
It can be used to quantify the amount of energy released
during fault ruptures.
Magnitude is proportional to the logarithm of seismic
energy.
The difference between two units of magnitude is a factor
of 1000 on energy release.
COUNTRIES:
1. Chile
2. Mexico
3. United States
4. Canada
5. Russia
6. Japan
7. Philippines
8. New Zealand
9. Antarctica
V=
W = total weight
A = numerical coeff. representative of the
inherent overstrength and global ductility
Vertical distance
Fx =
Beam
Slab
Rewall
Slab
Reinforcement
V=
2.5
0.11 Ca IW
0.8
W
I.
Method A
= ( )3/4
hn
hn
ENGLISH
SYSTEM
hn
hn
n = no. of storey
II. Method B
= 2
2
=1
( =1 )
Reyleighs Formula
Example.
Location: Cubao, Q.C.
Occupancy: Hospital
Structure: SMRF Concrete Special Moment
resiting Force system
Soil Profile: Guadalupe Tuff - C
Seismic Source type A
Deck
4th
3rd
2nd
GF
3m
3m
3m
3m
3m
100T
150T
150T
200T
2.5
0.11 Ca Iw
0.8
Seismic Zone 4
Cv= 0.56Nv
Nv=1.6(5km)
Cv= (0.56)(1.6) = 0.896
Ca= 0.4Na
Nv=1.2(5km)
Cv= (0.4)(1.2) = 0.48
Wihi
Fx
950 (38.4)
1800(34.8)
1800(31.2)
1800(27.6)
78.487
134.771
120.829
106.887
RD
11F
10F
9F
8F
7F
6F
1550
1860
1860
1860
1860
1860
1860
kN
kN
kN
kN
kN
kN
kN
5F
2240 kN
4F
2240 kN
3F
2240 kN
2F
3680 kN
Z 0.40
Seismic Source Type = A
N a 1.0
N v 1.2
Ca 0.40
Cv 0.672
3.0m
3.0m
3.0m
3.0m
3.0m
3.0m
3.0m
4.5m
4.5m
4.5m
6m
RD
11F
10F
9F
8F
7F
6F
1550
1860
1860
1860
1860
1860
1860
kN
kN
kN
kN
kN
kN
kN
5F
2240 kN
4F
2240 kN
3F
2240 kN
2F
3680 kN
3.0m
3.0m
3.0m
3.0m
3.0m
3.0m
3.0m
4.5m
4.5m
CI
(0.672)(1.0)
V v W
23110
RT
(8.5)T
4.5m
6m
RD
11F
10F
9F
8F
7F
6F
1550
1860
1860
1860
1860
1860
1860
kN
kN
kN
kN
kN
kN
kN
5F
2240 kN
4F
2240 kN
3F
2240 kN
2F
3680 kN
Portal Method
Description
Approximate method of getting distribution of
forces from lateral loads
Named so as the method assumes every bay of
the frame as one portal
More reliable for short buildings
Portal Method
Assumptions
Horizontal reactions of interior columns are twice
the reactions of exterior columns
There is a point of inflection at midheight of the
columns and midspan of the beams
Portal Method
Determine the member forces for the frame subjected to lateral loads.
80kN
3m
50kN
4m
6m
6m
6m
80kN
50kN
80kN
50kN
Cantilever Method
Description
Approximate method of getting distribution of
forces from lateral loads
Named so as the building is assumed to act as a
cantilever
More reliable for tall buildings
Cantilever Method
Assumptions
The axial force of each column is proportional to
the horizontal distance of the column from the
centroidal axis of the columns
There is a point of inflection at midheight of the
columns and midspan of the beams
Cantilever Method
Determine the member forces for the frame subjected to lateral loads.
80kN
5m
A1=500x500
60kN
A2=600X600
5m
A3=400X300
60kN
6m
A1
6m
A2
A3
6m
80kN
60kN
60kN
80kN
60kN
60kN