Professional Documents
Culture Documents
ScienceDirect
http://www.elsevier.com/locate/biombioe
Sustainable Forest Management Research Institute University of Valladolid-INIA, Av. Madrid 44, 34004 Palencia,
Spain
b
Departamento de Produccion Vegetal y Recursos Forestales, E.T.S. de Ingenieras Agrarias, Universidad de
Valladolid, Campus de Palencia, Spain
c
Departamento de Ciencias Agropecuarias, Facultad de Ingeniera y Ciencias Agropecuarias, Universidad Nacional
de San Luis, Argentina
article info
abstract
Article history:
The woodlands in the south-west of the Argentinean pampas are dominated by Prosopis
Caldenia Burkart (calden). The current deforestation rate of this woodlands is 0.82% per
year. Different compensation initiatives have begun that recognize the role of forests as
14 March 2014
environmental service providers. The financial incentives they offer make it necessary to
quantify the amount of carbon stored in the forest biomass. A model for estimating calden
biomass was developed. Thirty-eight trees were selected, felled and divided into sections.
An equation system was fitted using joint generalized regression to ensure the additivity
Keywords:
Calden
fire is the main disturbance and it can modify tree allometry, due this all models included
Aboveground biomass
the area of the base of the stem and tree height as independent variables since it indirectly
Belowground biomass
collects this variability. Total biomass and the stem fraction had the highest R2_Adj. values
Additivity
(0.75), while branches with a diameter less than 7 cm had the lowest (0.58). Tree biomass
Root/shoot ratio
was also analyzed by partitioning into the basic fractions of stem, crown, roots, and the
root/shoot ratio. Biomass allocation was greatest in the crown fraction and the mean root/
shoot ratio was 0.58. The carbon stock of the caldenales considering only calden tree
biomass is 20.2 Mg ha1. While the overall carbon balance of the region is negative
(deforestation and biomass burning, the remnant forested area has increased their calden
density and in an indirect way his carbon sequestration capacity could also be increased.
2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
1.
Introduction
* Corresponding author. E.T.S. de Ingenieras Agrarias, Universidad de Valladolid, Campus de Palencia, Av. Madrid 44, C.P. 34004, Spain.
Tel.: 34 979108427; fax: 34 979108440.
E-mail address: luciarisio@gmail.com (L. Risio).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.biombioe.2014.03.038
0961-9534/ 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Please cite this article in press as: Risio L, et al., Aboveground and belowground biomass allocation in native Prosopis caldenia
Burkart secondaries woodlands in the semi-arid Argentinean pampas, Biomass and Bioenergy (2014), http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/
j.biombioe.2014.03.038
b i o m a s s a n d b i o e n e r g y x x x ( 2 0 1 4 ) 1 e1 2
2.
2.1.
Study area
Please cite this article in press as: Risio L, et al., Aboveground and belowground biomass allocation in native Prosopis caldenia
Burkart secondaries woodlands in the semi-arid Argentinean pampas, Biomass and Bioenergy (2014), http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/
j.biombioe.2014.03.038
b i o m a s s a n d b i o e n e r g y x x x ( 2 0 1 4 ) 1 e1 2
years this area lost around 30,000 ha of dry forest that were
convert to dryland agriculture and the water table level rose
on average at a rate of 0.15 m yr1, with total elevation increments reaching up to 10 m in 35 years. This led to an abrupt
landscape dissection process accompanied by the appearance
of deep canyons and perennial watercourses [33] close to our
sampling site (2 km aprox.). Mean annual precipitation for the
1903e2010 period was 605 mm yr1 (INTA-Villa Mercedes
meteorological station; 33.652 65.420 ).
On this secondary woodland, cattle ranching were the
main activity for more than seventy years and there was not
active silviculture actions on it. Fire was not used systematically as a management tool but it was present (accidentally
and on purpose). Despite its proximity to the ecotone between
calden and quebracho blanco and algarrobo negro woodlands
[6] the vegetation composition of the stand is similar to the
pure stands of calden (more than 91.7% of calden trees, data
not shown). Besides calden, P. flexuosa (algarrobo) (3.2%), Celtis
tala Gillies ex. Planch (Tala) (0.6), Geoffroea decorticans Gill. ex.
H. and A. Burkart (Chanar) (3.2%), Jodina rombifolia Hook et Arn
(0.7%) and Apidosperma quebracho-blanco Schletchtendal (0.6%).
The physiognomy of the stand can be define as a high density
forest with grassland [17].
Although, it is very difficult find two calden woodlands
alike [17] we consider that this is a representative stand of a
secondary calden woodlands which today prevail.
2.2.
Data sampling
Fig. 1 e Location of the sampling site and natural distribution area of Prosopis caldenia in the Argentinean Pampas.
Please cite this article in press as: Risio L, et al., Aboveground and belowground biomass allocation in native Prosopis caldenia
Burkart secondaries woodlands in the semi-arid Argentinean pampas, Biomass and Bioenergy (2014), http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/
j.biombioe.2014.03.038
b i o m a s s a n d b i o e n e r g y x x x ( 2 0 1 4 ) 1 e1 2
Table 1 e Summary of the main tree and stand level variables from Prosopis caldenia plot measurements (n [ 30).
Mean
SD
Minimum
Maximum
DBH
BD
Ht
Crown height
Crown area
% Single
% Multi
Age
11.51
6.51
3.52
54
16.12
8.71
7.51
57.61
4.91
1.32
1.42
11.41
1.71
0.62
0.23
5.72
4.43
5.01
0.02
54.43
453
195
180
960
48
12.92
22
69.52
52
12.91
31
78
24
4.93
14
41
Note: SD, standard deviation; DBH, diameter at breast height (cm); BD, diameter at tree base (cm); Ht, tree height (m); Crown height, crown base
height (m), Crown area in m; % single, percentage of single-stemmed trees; % multi., percentage of multi-stemmed trees (usually 2e3 stems per
tree); Age in years.
2.3.
Data analysis
Data analysis consisted of four consecutive steps: a) correlation analysis b) individual fitting of the evaluated biomass
Please cite this article in press as: Risio L, et al., Aboveground and belowground biomass allocation in native Prosopis caldenia
Burkart secondaries woodlands in the semi-arid Argentinean pampas, Biomass and Bioenergy (2014), http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/
j.biombioe.2014.03.038
b i o m a s s a n d b i o e n e r g y x x x ( 2 0 1 4 ) 1 e1 2
Table 2 e Standard deviation, maximum, minimum and mean values of tree level variables and the different tree biomass
fractions (n [ 38) for Prosopis caldenia.
Total height
DBH
BD
AB
Mean
SD
Minimum
Maximum
5.21
1.02
3.01
7.51
11.03
3.92
5.01
21.12
14.31
4.72
7.53
24.92
181.38
114.27
44.53
487.83
<2
2e7
>7
7.22
7.31
1.71
39.93
8.01
5.51
0.22
22.01
10.93
10.11
0.00
42.7
Leaves
Stem
Roots
Total
1.41
1.02
0.34
4.40
11.82
10.44
1.61
49.32
20.31
15.42
3.31
66.42
59.52
40.83
10.12
199.91
Note: SD, standard deviation; Total height in m; DBH, diameter at breast height (cm); BD, diameter at tree base (cm); AB, area of the base of the
stem; <2, branches less than 2 cm in diameter (kg); 2e7, branches 2e7 cm in diameter (kg); >7, branches greater than 7 cm in diameter (kg);
Total, total biomass (kg).
Table 3 e Biomass models evaluated for different tree components for Prosopis caldenia.
Model
1
2
3
4
5
6
Equation
W
W
W
W
W
W
Model
b*(AB*Ht)
b*(AB2*Ht)
(b*AB) (l*AB2) (q*AB2*Ht)
(b*AB) (l*Ht)
(b*AB2) l*(AB2*Ht)
a b*(AB2*Ht)l
Equation
7
8
9
10
11
W
W
W
W
W
(b*AB2) (l*Ht)
(b*AB2) (l*Ht) (q*AB2*Ht)
(b*AB2) l*(AB*Ht)
b*(AB2*Ht) l*(AB*Ht)
b*(ABl)*(Htq)
Note. W, dry Biomass (kg); AB, area of the base (cm); Ht, tree height (m); a, b, q, l, parameters of the models.
3.
Results
18
16
14
Number of trees
12
10
8
6
4
2
14
21
23
24
25
26
31
39
0
41
Years
Please cite this article in press as: Risio L, et al., Aboveground and belowground biomass allocation in native Prosopis caldenia
Burkart secondaries woodlands in the semi-arid Argentinean pampas, Biomass and Bioenergy (2014), http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/
j.biombioe.2014.03.038
b i o m a s s a n d b i o e n e r g y x x x ( 2 0 1 4 ) 1 e1 2
Table 4 e Correlation coefficients between biomass component and dendrometric variables of Prosopis caldenia.
Branches <2
Correlation coeff.
Branches 2e7
Correlation coeff.
Branches>7
Correlation coeff.
Leaves
Correlation coeff.
Roots
Correlation coeff.
Stem
Correlation coeff.
Total
Correlation coeff.
Hc
Ht
DBH
DB
AB
Dc
0.09
(0.6213)
0.01
(0.9711)
0.02
(0.9123)
0.03
(0.8834)
0.01
(0.9612)
0.07
(0.7022)
0.02
(0.9032)
0.11
(0.5231)
0.34
(0.0443)
0.24
(0.1542)
0.14
(0.4014)
0.29
(0.0833)
0.24
(0.1522)
0.33
(0.0412)
0.48
0.003
0.63
<0.0001
0.67
<0.0001
0.56
0.0004
0.66
<0.0001
0.61
<0.0001
0.56
0.0004
0.64
(<0.0001)
0.77
(<0.0001)
0.76
(<0.0001)
0.72
(<0.0001)
0.87
(<0.0001)
0.82
(<0.0001)
0.83
(<0.0001)
0.67
(<0.0001)
0.77
(<0.0001)
0.77
(<0.0001)
0.74
(<0.0001)
0.89
(<0.0001)
0.85
(<0.0001)
0.86
(<0.0001)
0.17
(0.3333)
0.06
(0.7523)
0.14
(0.4111)
0.19
(0.2514)
0.13
(0.4400)
0.11
(0.5323)
0.09
(0.6101)
Note: p-value between parentheses, Hc, crown height; Ht, tree total height; DBH, diameter at breast height; DB, tree basal diameter; AB, area of
the base; Dc, tree crown diameter.
Table 5 e Independent adjustments of the evaluated models with significant estimated parameters for each biomass
fraction of Prosopis caldenia.
Fraction
Branches <2 cm leaves
Branches 2e7 cm
Branches >7 cm
Stem
Roots
Total biomass
Model
SSE
RMSE
R2_Adj.
Model
RMSE
R2_Adj.
1
2
1
2
1
2
1
2
6
1
2
6
1
2
6
1410.12
1668.41
764.01
1178.92
1962.12
2509.72
2421.91
2580.72
1600.52
5706.91
7137.12
3533.43
41,001.61
54,132.21
22,836.31
6.17
6.72
4.54
5.65
7.28
8.24
8.09
8.35
6.67
12.42
13.89
9.36
33.29
38.25
25.19
0.05
0.13
0.30
0.08
0.34
0.16
0.40
0.36
0.59
0.36
0.20
0.59
0.38
0.19
0.65
302.11
3.03
0.71
6
7
6
7
7
8
9
7
9
480.14
304.74
1421.93
476.91
625.61
971.32
2264.21
2341.52
5594.01
3.65
3.09
6.29
4.06
4.42
5.27
7.93
8.84
12.47
0.55
0.66
0.51
0.76
0.82
0.75
0.43
0.70
0.36
7
9
13,465.53
40,412.21
21.19
33.51
0.78
0.38
SSE
Note: Branches <2, branches less than 2 cm in diameter; Branches 2e7, branches 2e7 cm in diameter; Branches >7, branches greater than 7 cm
in diameter; SSE, sum of square error; RMSE, root of the mean quadratic error; R2_Adj., r2 adjusted correlation coefficient. All estimated parameters were significant at 0.0001.
Please cite this article in press as: Risio L, et al., Aboveground and belowground biomass allocation in native Prosopis caldenia
Burkart secondaries woodlands in the semi-arid Argentinean pampas, Biomass and Bioenergy (2014), http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/
j.biombioe.2014.03.038
b i o m a s s a n d b i o e n e r g y x x x ( 2 0 1 4 ) 1 e1 2
Power values
Selected model
Estimated parameters
9.14
0.71
1.22988*107
W (b*AB2) (l*h)
333.82
9.82
0.64
1.71880
W (b*AB2) (l*h)
1049.72
30.87
0.58
2.39614
W (b*AB2) (l*h)
Stem
957.14
28.15
0.75
2.16213
W (b*AB2) (l*h)
Roots
2891.51
85.04
0.65
6.78854
W ( b* AB2) (l*h)
16,982.71
566.12
0.75
1.66889
W (b*AB2) (l*h)
0.000054
0.784828
0.000045
0.948952
0.00007
1.108615
0.00009
1.123
0.000142
2.171142
0.000401
6.136537
Biomass fraction
SSE
310.83
Branches 2e7
Branches > 7
Total biomass
RMSE
Note: SSE, sum of error square; RMSE, root of the mean quadratic error; R2_Adj., r2 adjusted correlation coefficient; Power values, factor used in
the power function to correct heteroscedasticity.
gradient (Fig 7). Only the data between the diameter range
used to fit the equation system (DBH between 7.5 and 24.9)
were used. The AB varies from 0.2 to 3.4 m2 ha1, the crown
fraction had a mean percentage of 45.40, a maximum of 46.28
and a minimum of 42.82, the stem mean value was 19.21, the
maximum 21.77 and the minimum 18.34 and finally the roots
fraction showed a mean value of 35.39, a maximum of 35.41
and a minimum of 35.38.
4.
Discussion
100
90
80
70
60
Crown
50
Stem
40
Roots
30
20
10
0.43
0.44
0.50
0.50
0.60
0.66
0.81
0.83
0.83
0.90
0.96
1.01
1.02
1.03
1.18
1.26
1.28
1.28
1.30
1.36
1.41
1.50
1.67
1.74
1.76
1.97
1.99
2.00
2.32
2.34
2.52
2.88
3.45
3.46
3.60
4.03
4.62
4.89
Fig. 4 e Real total dry biomass partitioning of Prosopis caldenia felled trees (n [ 38): crown (all branches plus foliage), stem
and roots.
Please cite this article in press as: Risio L, et al., Aboveground and belowground biomass allocation in native Prosopis caldenia
Burkart secondaries woodlands in the semi-arid Argentinean pampas, Biomass and Bioenergy (2014), http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/
j.biombioe.2014.03.038
b i o m a s s a n d b i o e n e r g y x x x ( 2 0 1 4 ) 1 e1 2
Fig. 7 e Estimated total dry biomass partitioning of Prosopis caldenia trees (n [ 520): crown (all branches plus foliage), stem
and root system.
Please cite this article in press as: Risio L, et al., Aboveground and belowground biomass allocation in native Prosopis caldenia
Burkart secondaries woodlands in the semi-arid Argentinean pampas, Biomass and Bioenergy (2014), http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/
j.biombioe.2014.03.038
b i o m a s s a n d b i o e n e r g y x x x ( 2 0 1 4 ) 1 e1 2
Tree height was included because it is present in forest inventories and indirectly facilitates information about the
competitive environment in which the tree was developed:
such as stand age, density or site quality [55]. This makes the
model less specific and more adaptable for use at different
sites [56].
In foliar biomass estimates for P. flexuosa based on allometric relations [57], estimations using tree level variables
measured in the crown and at the base of the live crown
showed a better fit than those based on stem measurements.
Foliar biomass estimations for P. flexuosa using basal diameter
as a predictor gave the worst results, followed by estimations
based on measurements at the stem apex.
Similar behavior was observed in P. caldenia: foliar biomass
predictions based on tree basal area, basal diameter or
diameter at breast height were inadequate and were not
improved by incorporating other variables such as tree height.
To solve this problem, the foliar fraction was combined with
the fraction for branches less than 2 cm in diameter. These
two fractions are closely linked and would have the same use
in a harvesting plan; therefore their homogenization presents
no major practical problems. All models of the equation system presented a similar independent setting, with a minimum
R2_adj. of 0.66 for branches 2e7 cm in diameter and a
maximum of 0.82 for stem with bark (Table 5).
The partitioning of biomass within the tree indicates that
calden allocates the greatest part of its resources to crown
development (leaves plus branches of all diameters), then to
the root system and finally to the stem (Fig. 4). Similar biomass
partitioning proportions have been described for Quercus ilex L.
and Quercus suber L. and other hardwood species in the Iberian
peninsula [58]. P. caldenia tends to ramify and bifurcate to low
high [17], these stem bifurcations may have been considered
has branches of more than 7 cm of diameter, which may have
led to this biomass partitions values. Besides, calden is an
heliofita species [17] so it is natural that allocate a big part of
its aboveground biomass in the crown.
The biomass partitioning within the tree obtained from the
inventory data and the estimated models do not reflect the
real variability of the biomass partitioning within the tree
(Fig. 7). The obtained values are almost equal to the real mean
values: 19% for the stem, 35% for the root system and 46% for
the crown. This issue has to be considered since these three
basic components of the tree led to different uses and products and they proportions can vary according to the management history of the stand (fire, herbivory, wood extraction,
pruning).
According to the IPCC biome classification [24], the calden
woodlands are temperate continental forest, and the total
aboveground biomass estimated (included woody and herbaceous species) for these woodlands are equal to 60 Mg ha1
(10e130) for 20 years old forest or 130 Mg ha1 (50e200) for
forest older than 20 years, the values between parentheses are
the intervals. We estimated the dry matter per hectare for a
calden woodland with an average age of 24 years (we not
consider other tree, brushes or herbaceous species) and our
mean value estimated is equal to 11.5 Mg ha1 (2.6e31.5).
Our value is lower than that of IPCC, but part of this variability could be due for the unanalyzed compartments. However this probes the importance of determinate specific
coefficient for each ecosystem to reduce the global uncertainties in the global carbon balance. Viglizzo and Jobaggy
[12] analyzed the balance and the carbon stock in the Espinal
for the period of 1956e2005 and they found a slight increase of
the woody area which agree with data from Dussart [43]
mainly due to the fire and cattle breeding. However, they
concluded that this region has been acting like a source and
not a like a pool of carbon due to the high deforestation rate
and the subsequent biomass burning.
The calden root/shoot ratio varies from 1.88 to 0.07.
Mokany [59] observed that for forest and woodlands, root/
shoot ratios were related to several factors associated with
stand development. They decreased significantly with increases in shoot biomass, stand age, stand height, and mean
DBH, and increased with tree density. For P. caldenia we do not
observe a clear trend for root/shoot ratios as a function of tree
age (Fig. 5), but there is one between the root/shoot ratio and
tree density (Fig. 6). This could be associated to the fire history
of the stand, since fire may stimulate calden implantation
rates and change the structural pattern of growth when only
kills the aboveground part of the tree, stimulating the
regrowth of stem bases [43].
Other abiotics factors that could affect the root/shoot ratio
are: soil characteristics, as nutrient availability [60,61] and
texture [62,63] or the water table level, since decreasing soil
moisture produces higher root/shoot ratios [64] and P. caldenia
can have a groundwater consumption with shallow water
table levels [65]. Although soil types, water table level and fire
scarce in tree rings were not checked in this work.
Channel [66] and Cairns [67] found no significant differences in the below/aboveground biomass ratio between
different groups of species and established a general ratio of
0.25 for deciduous species, regardless of latitude or soil
texture. However, we found a root/shoot mean ratio for P.
caldenia equal to 0.58. This value coincides with the results of
Ruiz-Peinado for Spanish hardwood species [58], who calculated the root/shoot ratios for the main species of the Iberian
Peninsula and found that their mean values did not coincide
with that of Cairns [67] either. Several species showed similar
or even higher mean ratios (in parentheses) than that of calden: such as Quercus canariensis Willd (0.49), Quercus faginea
Lamb (0.36), Castanea sativa Miller (0.77), Ceratonia siliqua L.
(0.81) or Alnus glutinosa (L.) Gaertn (0.81).
The differences between Iberian or calden tree values and
that established by Cairns [67] can partly be explained by
management practices (harvesting of aerial parts for firewood
or charcoal extraction and burning to stimulate herbaceous
regrowth), but are mainly due to the arid/semi-arid climate, in
which deep and extensive root systems are better suited for
water and nutrient uptake. Gaston [68] determined an average
ratio of 0.47 for forests and savannas in arid and semi-arid
climate, which is closer to our results.
The natural heterogeneity of the caldenal is heightened for
some disturbance factors and this is a disadvantage for the
model behavior. However, a great part of this created variability is indirectly collected by the selected input variables:
fire and cattle breeding are related with an increased in calden
tree disperse, recruitment, survive and resprout which
determinate the stand density [60] and this one, modifies the
tree growth in height and the root/shoot ratio. Fire also
Please cite this article in press as: Risio L, et al., Aboveground and belowground biomass allocation in native Prosopis caldenia
Burkart secondaries woodlands in the semi-arid Argentinean pampas, Biomass and Bioenergy (2014), http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/
j.biombioe.2014.03.038
10
b i o m a s s a n d b i o e n e r g y x x x ( 2 0 1 4 ) 1 e1 2
[2]
[3]
[4]
[5]
[6]
[7]
5.
Conclusions
[8]
[9]
[10]
[11]
[12]
[13]
[14]
Acknowledgments
Comments raised by two anonymous referees have greatly
improved the presentation and accuracy of this paper. We
would like to thank all those who participated in the laborious
field work, especially L. Garay, M. Nievas, P. Rossi, E. Orqun,
M. Zavala, O. Allione and C. Bintana. Thanks also to M.
Marchissio and to M. Chaparro for allowing us to participate in
his work. To Catalina Roa for the dendrochronological analysis. Finally, we gratefully acknowledge funding from the
ERASMUS MUNDUS ECW 2009 1655/001-001 European Union
mobility programme (ERASMUS MUNDUS 2009 1655/001-001
ECW) fellowship awarded to the corresponding author and
PICT2011 0745 MinCyT for economical support in the sampling
activities.
references
[15]
[16]
[17]
[18]
[19]
[20]
Please cite this article in press as: Risio L, et al., Aboveground and belowground biomass allocation in native Prosopis caldenia
Burkart secondaries woodlands in the semi-arid Argentinean pampas, Biomass and Bioenergy (2014), http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/
j.biombioe.2014.03.038
b i o m a s s a n d b i o e n e r g y x x x ( 2 0 1 4 ) 1 e1 2
[42]
[43]
[44]
[45]
[46]
[47]
[48]
[49]
[50]
[51]
[52]
[53]
[54]
[55]
[56]
[57]
[58]
[59]
[60]
[61]
[62]
11
Please cite this article in press as: Risio L, et al., Aboveground and belowground biomass allocation in native Prosopis caldenia
Burkart secondaries woodlands in the semi-arid Argentinean pampas, Biomass and Bioenergy (2014), http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/
j.biombioe.2014.03.038
12
b i o m a s s a n d b i o e n e r g y x x x ( 2 0 1 4 ) 1 e1 2
Please cite this article in press as: Risio L, et al., Aboveground and belowground biomass allocation in native Prosopis caldenia
Burkart secondaries woodlands in the semi-arid Argentinean pampas, Biomass and Bioenergy (2014), http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/
j.biombioe.2014.03.038