Professional Documents
Culture Documents
BROWN
Mayer Brown LLP
1999 K Street, NW
Washington, DC 20006-1 101
Main Tel +1 202 263 3000
MainFax+l 2022633300
www.mayerbrown.com
Matthew J. McConkey
Direct Tel +1 202 263 3235
Direct Fax 202-263 5365
mmcconkev@ maverbrown.com
PUBLIC VERSION
Business Proprietary Information Deleted
at Pages: I-3, I- I 3-I- 15, I-23, I-24, I-26, I-
from India
Dear Secretary Pritzker and Secretary Barton:
On behalf of Weldbend Corporation ("'Weldbend") and Boltex Mfg. Co., L.P. ("Boltex")
(collectively "the petitioners"), we respectfully submit to the U.S. Deparlment of Commerce ("the
Mayer Brown LLP operales in combination with other Mayer Brown entities with offices in Europe and Asia
and is associated with Tauil & Chequer Advogados, a Brazilian law partnership.
1208298'79
Department") and the U.S. International Trade Commission ("the Commission") the enclosed
petitions for the imposition of antidumping duties on U.S. imports of finished carbon steel flanges
from lndia, Italy and Spai4 and countervailing duties on imports from lndia. \Meldbend and Boltex
are engaged in the manufacture arid production of the domestic like product in the United States and
of
19
Volume I
Volume II
o
- Antidumping
Volume III
- Antidumping
Volume IV
Volume V
regulations and section 207 .10(a) of the Commission's regulations, we certiff that the petitions and
j.
all required copies were filed today with both the Department and the Commission. Volumes I thru
Volume IV of the petitions are being filed electronically on the Department's ACCESS filing
system. However, Volume V and the accompanying exhibits are being filed manually with the
.:
Department. An original and nine paper copies of the business proprietary version and an original
plus two paper copies of the ipublic version of the narrative portions of each volume along, with
CDs containing the associated business proprietary and public version exhibits, are being filed
manually at the Commrsslon.
720829879
1677(bxl),
of
':
proprietary treatment for certain information in the petitions, which we designate by placing it
within brackets. The nature of the information, and the basis for this request is as follows
Paee or
Nature of Information
Exhibit
29,31, Exhibits
l-ll,l-12;
I-14, I-15,
I-15-A.I-15-8.
VOLUME
II.
Pages
1,IV-sb,IV-8.
IV-
information that directly would lead to or disclose proprietary information. V/e tther represent
7208298'.79
that disclosure of such infonnion would cause substantial harm to the competitive position of the
'
petitioners, and would impair the ability of the Department and the Commission to obtain
!
comparable information in the future in fulfillment of their statutory functions. A public version of
:
the petitions has been prepared and is being filed simultaneously with this submission pursuant to
section 351.304(c)(l) of the Department's regulations and section 201.S(d) of the Commission's
regulations.
Pursuant to paragraph
agree
.:
to permit disclosure of all proprietary information under an properly executed administrative
protective order ("APO'). The petitioners, however, reserve the right to comment on all APO
applications prior to any requested disclosure, or to withdraw information in the event that the
agency declines to afford proprietary treatment to any information.
]
regulations. These include the verification that information substantially identical to the above-
:'
claimed proprietary information is not available to the public in accordance with 19 C.F.R.
201.6(bx3)(iii), or would otherwise reveal proprietary information. Also attached are the requisite
company and counsel certifications regarding the completeness and accuracy of the information
,.
720829879
If you have any qugstions congeming these petitions, please contact the undersigned,
Respectfrrlly
BROWN LLP
999K Sfeet, NW
Washington, DC 20006
(202)263-3000
Weldbend Corportion and
Boltex lt4fg. Co. L.P.
Counsel
720829879
for
CERTIFICATIO
OF'COI]NSEI,
knowledge and beliet information substantially identical to that for which proprietary treatment
has been requested in this submission is not available to the general public.
Further, in accordance with 19 C.F.R. $ 207.3(a), I hereby certify that (1) I have read the
attached submission, and (2) to the best of my knowledge, the information contained in this
J. McConkey
District of Columbia: SS
Subscribed and swom before me this
30th day of June, 2016
V
otary Public
My Commission expires
t.r
rr
720829879
:.,
REPRESENTATIVB CERTIFICATION
I, Matthew McConkey, with Mayer Brown LLP, counsel to Weldbend Corporation and
Boltex Mfg. Co., certify that I have read the attached June 30, 2015 Petitons for the Imposition of
Antidumping Dutes on Imports of Finished Carbon Steel Flangesfrom India, Italy and Spain and
Countervaling Dutes on Imports from India (Inv. Nos. A-533-871 , A-475-835, A-469-815 and
c-s33-812)..
In my capacity as counsel of this submission, I certify that the information contained in
this submission is accurate and complete to the best of my knowledge. I am aware that U.S. law
(including, but not limited to, l8 U.S.C. 1001) imposes criminal sanctions on individuals who
knowingly and willfully make material false statements to the U.S. Government. In addition, I
am aware that, even if this submission may be withdrawn from the record of the AD/CVD
proceeding, the U.S. Department of Commerce may preserve this submission, including a
business proprietary submission, for purposes of determining the accuracy of this certification.
I certify that
a copy of
Matthew M
720829879
COMPANY CERTIFICATION
I, James J. Coulas, Jq prsident, currently employed by Weldbend Corporation, certify
that I prepared or otherwise supervised the preparation of the attachcd June 30, 2015, Pelilions
r the Impostion of ntidumpng Dutes on Imports of Finished Carbon Steel Flangesfrom India,
Italyand Span and CountervailngDuties on Importsfrom Inda (Inv. Nos. A-533-871, A-47583s, 4469-81 5 and C-533-872).
I certiff that the public information and any business proprictary inforrnation
of
Wetdbend containcd in this submission is accurate and cornplete to the best of my knowledge. I
am aware that the information contained in this submission rnay be subject to verification or
.
corroboration (as appropriate) by the U.S. Department of Commerce. I am also aware that U.S.
law'(including, but not limited to, l8 U.S.C. l00l) imposes criminal sanctions on individuals
who knowingly and willfully make material false staternents to thc U,S. Governmcnt. In
addition, I am awarc that, even if this submission may be withdrawn from the record of the
AD/CVD procccding, the U.S. Department of Commerce may preserve this submission,
including a business proprietary submission, for purposes of determining the accuracy of this
certification.
I certify that a copy of this signed certification will be filcd with this submission lo the
U.S- Departmcnt of Commerce.
Signaturc
7l0l{29879
r the
Imposition of Antdumping Dutes on Imports of Finishert Carbon Steel Fkutges fi'ont Inrla, Italy
anrl Spain und Cottntervailing Dutes on hnporfrom
I certify that the public information and any business proprietary information of Boltex
contained in this subrnission is accurate and complete to the best of my knowledge. I am alvare
that the information contained in this subrirission may be subject to verification or coroboration
(as appropriate) by the U.S. Department of Commerce.
but not lirnited to, 18 U.S.C. 1001) imposes criminal sanctions on individuals who knowingly
and
willfully
that, even if this submission may be withdrarvn from the recorcl ofthe AD/CVD proceeding, the
U.S. Dcparrment of Comrnerce may peserve this submisson, including
a business
proprietary
I cerlify that
Sign
1208218,19
will
o-e
PUBLIC VERSION
731-TA-_
Exhibits
l-ll,l-12,I-14
and I-15
BEFORE THE
INTERNATIONAL TRADE ADMINISTRATION OF THE
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
AND THE
U.S. INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION
Simeon M. Kriesberg
Matthew J. McConkey
Fabian Rivelis
Sr. International Trade Advisor
June 30,2016
71990s499
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Page
I.
COMMON ISSUES
A.
B.
Identity of the Industry on Whose Behalf the Petitions Are Filed (19
C.F.R. $ 207.11(bx2)Xii); le C.F.R. $ 351.202(bX2)
C.
D.
E.
Previous Requests for Import Relief for the Merchandise (19 C.F.R.
3 s r .202(b)(4)) ...,.......
1.
3.
II
The Names of the Subject Countries and the Name of Any Intermediate
Country Through Which the Merchandise Is Transshipped (19 C.F.R.
.11
$ 3s 1.202(bX6))...,...,.......
G.
.,.,,.,... 12
3st.202(b)(7xixA))
351.202(bX8)
H.
I.
.............'12
13
T.
I4
III
l4
.l
71990s499
A.
Introduction,..........
t4
B.
t6
C.
t8
D.
l8
}
TABLE OF'CONTENTS
(continued)
Page
a. .
b. ,
All
c.
d. '
e.
F
20
20
20
Conclusion
2t
1.
..,,21
a.
b
2.
,,' 19
22
23
23
a.
Margins
b.
24
25
25
c.
3.
a.'
:
b.
26
..27
,,28
c.
1l
'719905499
TABLE OF CONTENTS
(continued)
Page
4.
G.
1.
2.
.30
.30
b.
.3l
.31
c.
d.
e.
f.
Summary...
.33
34
CONCLUSION
34
lll
'n9905499
.29
a.
IV
.29
Conclusion
PUBLIC VERSION
These petitions are filed on behalf of the U.S. industry producing finished carbon steel
flanges ("flanges"). The petitioners in this case are Weldbend Corporation ("'Weldbend") and
Boltex Mfg. Co., L.P. ("Boltex") (collectively "Petitioners"). These two companies account for
the majority of flange production in the United States and, therefore, represent the U.S. industry
producing flanges within the meaning of sections 702(c)(a) and732(c)(4) of the Tariff Act of
1930, as amended (the "Act").1
Petitioners allege that flanges, which are more fully described in Section 1.E., infra, from
India, Spain and Italy are being, or are likely to be, sold in the United States at less than fair
value within the meaning of section 73 1 ( I ) of the Act.2 Petitioners further allege that the
Government of India is providing countervailable subsidies with respect to the manufacture,
production, and export of flanges within the meaning of section 701(a)(1) of the Act.3
Petitioners also allege that the unfairly traded imports are a cause of material injury to the U.S.
industry producing flanges and threaten to cause further material injury if remedial action is not
taken. Petitioners, therefore, request that antidumping duties be imposed on flanges from India,
Spain and Italy in an amoirnt equal to the amount by which the normal value exceeds the export
price or constructed export price of the merchandise. Petitioners also request that countervailing
duties be imposed on imports of flanges from India in an amount equal to the net countervailable
subsidy.
These petitions set forth relevant information reasonably available to Petitioners and are
filed in conformity with the requirements of section35l.202 of the regulations of the U.S.
719905499
PUBLIC VERSION
.ll
of the
o'Commission").4
regulations of the U.S. International Trade Commission (ooITC" or
I.
COMMON ISSUES
A.
Petitioners are companies that produce the domestic like product in the United States.
Petitioners are therefore domestie interested parties with the meaning of 19 U.S.C. $ 1677(9) and
19 C.F.R. $ 351.102(b). The two Petitioners in this case are:
Weldbend Corporation
6600 South Harlem Ave.
Argo,IL 60501-1930
'Weldbend purchases flange forgings that it then processes into finished flanges, while Boltex
produces its own flange forgings, which it then either processes into finished flanges or sells to
.
other U.S. companies that process the flange forging into finished flanges. The only other
domestic company that is'known to have any meaningful domestic flange forging operations is
Ameri-Forge. See Exhibit I-15. As such, the rest of the domestic industry primarily purchases
flange forgings and processes them into finished flanges.
Neither Weldbend nor Boltex imports the subject merchandise, nor are either of them
l9 C.F.R. $$ 351.202;and207,ll
2
7r990s499
PUBLIC VERSION
B.
Identty of the Industry on \ilhose Behalf the Petitions Are Filed (19 C.F.R.
$ 207.11(bX2)Xii); le c.F.R. $ 3s1.202(bX2))
These petitions are filed on behalf of the U.S, industry that produce flanges.
Exhibit I-1
contains contact information for known flange producers in the United States. The list
of
domestic producers of flanges is based on general industry knowledge, Internet research, and the
declarations of the presidents for both Weldbend and Boltex. See Exhibit
:l
information available to Petitioners, Exhibit I-1 identifies all known producers of the domestic
like product in the United States.
C.
3s1.202(bX3))
The statute requires that "the domestic producers or workers who support the petition
account for at least 25 percent of the total production of the like product.5 In addition, the statute
requires that "the domestic producers or workers who support the petition account for more than
50 percent of the production of the domestic like product produced by the portion of the industry
] pounds. As
identified in Exhibit I-1 there arc 12 additional domestic producers of flanges. However,
company-specific production data for those 12 additional domestic producers are not available to
Petitioners, nor do Petitioners know of any source of information (public or otherwise) for that
data. However, as set forth in the affidavits at Exhibit I-2, Petitioners are quite confident that
J
'n9905499
PUBLIC VERSION
they represent more than250/o of total domestic production of flanges. See also Exhibit I-15 for
a calculation of how Petitioners meetthe
Previous Requests for Import Relief for the Merchandise (19 C.F.R.
3s1.202(bX4))
1.
The domestic industry previously sought relief from serious injury suffered as a result
of
surges in imports of certain steel products, including carbon and alloy steel flanges, pursuant to
section 201 of the Trade Acl of 1974 ("Section 201") (19 U.S.C. 2251).
On June 22,200I,,.the Commission initiated a safeguard investigation under section 201,
following receipt of
a request
resolution adopted by
the Committee on Finance of the U.S. Senate ("Finance Committee") requesting that the
Commission investigate certain steel imports under section 2017 The Commission consolidated
the investigation requested by the Finance Committee with the Commission's previously
instituted investigation.
It recommended an additional
13 perce nt ad
valorem duty on
flanges in the first year of relief, to be reduced to a 10 percent ad valoremduty in the second
Consolidation of Senate Finane Committee Resolution Requesting a Section 201 Investigation with the
Investigation Requested by the United States Trade Representative on June 22. 2001, 66 Fed. Reg. 44,158 (USITC
Aug,22,2001).
I
e
See id.
See Steel,Inv, No. TA-201'-7'3,USITC
4
7t9905499
PUBLIC VERSION
year of relief, 7 percent ad valorem dty in the third year of relief, and 4 percent ad valorem duty
.'
a period
The President also instructed the Secretary of the Treasury and the Secretary
of
of
certain steel products.12 The purpose of the import monitoring system was to provide steel
producers, consumers, importers, and the general public with accurate and timely information on
anticipated imports of certain steel products. The system required licenses for imports of certain
steel products that were covered under the President's safeguard action.l3 On December 4, 2003,
President Bush terminated the increased tariffs under the safeguard measure.la The import
licensing system, however, remained in place through March 21,2005, and continues in
ro
tr
t2
t'
t4
ft.
at2.
'
ld.
The Department of Commerce published regulations establishing such a system on December 31,2002.
See Steel lmport Mo4itorine and Analysis System. 70 Fed. Reg. 12,133 (Dep't Commerce Mar. 11, 2005).
See Presidential Proclarnation 7741 of December 4. 2003. To Provide for the Termination of Action Taken
With Regard to Imports of Ce4ai Steel Products" 68 Fed. Reg. 68,483, 68,484 (Dec. 8, 2003).
rs
See Steel Import Monitoring and Analysis System. 70 Fed. Pieg.72,373 (Dep't Commerce Dec. 5, 2005).
5
719905499
PUBLIC VERSION
2,
To Petitioners' knowledge, carbon steel flanges have not been subject to previous
antidumping and/or countervailing duty investigations under sections 702 and732 of the Trade
Act of 1930, as amended (the "Act") (19 U.S.C. $$ 1671a and I673a). As such, currently, there
are no antidumping duty orders on carbon steel flanges from India, Spain and
ltaly, and no
of
welding the ends of the fitting to pipe or any other type of structure that needs a solid connection.
A flange is only welded in one area. However, the biggest difference is that flanges have holes
in the flange portion of the product that is to be joined with another flange or valve or other type
of connection with the same bolting pattem.
3.
Petitioners have not sought import relief under section 337 of the Act (19 U.S.C. $ 1337),
'
section 232 of the Trade Expansion Act of 1962 (19 U.S.C. $ 1862), or section 301 of the Trade
$ 2411),
petitions.
E.
l.
The imported merchandise that Petitioners intend to cover in these investigations are
:l
finished carbon steel flanges, which are classified in the HTSUS under subheadings
7307.9L 5010 and7307.91.5050. A full description of the scope of these investigations is
6
719905499
PUBLIC VERSION
contained in Exhibit
also be made of alloy steel, stainless steel and other types of metals, but those are not covered by
:
these
petitions.
2.
A flange is a product for connecting pipes, valves, pumps and other equipment to form
piping system. It also provides easy access for cleaning, inspection or modification. Flanges
are usually welded or screwed. Flanged joints are made by bolting together two flanges with a
gasket between them to provide a seal. The material of a flange is basically dictated by the
choice of the pipe, as in most cases a flange is of the same material as the pipe. As such, this
makes, for example, alloy steel flanges different from carbon steel flanges, or stainless steel
flanges. Although the word "flange" generally refers to the actual raised rim or lip of a fitting,
many flanged plumbing fittings are themselves known as 'flanges,' The basic types of flanges
are
i
Weld neck
V/eld neck flanges are circumferentially welded at the neck where the integrity of the butt
welded area can be easily examined by radiography. The bores of both pipe and flange
match, which reduces turbulence and erosion inside the pipeline. The weld neck is
therefore durable in,critical applications. It is designed to be joined to a piping system
by butt welding. It is preferred for high stress applications. The neck, or hub, transmits
stresses from the base of the h-ub to the wall thickness at the butt weld, providing
important reinforcement of the flange.
7
'n9905499
PUBLIC VERSION
Slip-on
Slip-on flanges are fitted over the pipe. Slip-on flanges are easy to use in fabricated
applications. Therflange is slipped over the pipe and then welded both inside and outside
to provide sufficient:strength and prevent leakage.
o
Socket Weld
This is similar to a slip-on flange, but the bore is counter-bored to accept pipe. The
diameter of the rernaining bore is the same as the inside diameter of the pipe. The flange
is attached to the pipe by a fillet weld around the hub of the flange. An optional interval
weld may be applied in high stress applications. This flange's biggest use is in high
pressure systems suh as hydraulic and steam lines.
a
Threaded
Threaded flange are,referred to as either threaded or screwed. They are used to connect
other threadedcomponents in low pressure, non-critical applications. This is similar to
slip-on flanges, buf lhe bore is threaded, thus enabling assembly without welding. The
lack of welding limits this flange's application to relatively low pressure piping systems.
I
719905499
PUBLIC VERSION
Lap Joint
A lap joint is used in low pressure applications because it is easily assembled and aligned.
A lap joint is similar to a slip-on flange, but it has a radius at the intersection of the bore
and the flange face to accommodate alap stub end. The face on the stub end forms the
gasket fce on the flange. This type of flange is used in applications where sections of
piping systems need to be dismantled quickly and easily for inspection or replacement.
o
Blind
Blind flanges are used to blank off pipe lines, valves and pumps. They can also be used
as an inspection cover. This is a flange without a bore and is used to shut off a piping
system or vessel opening. It also permits easy access to vessels or piping systems for
inspection purposes. Blind flanges can be supplied with or without hubs at the
manufacturers option. It is sometimes referred to as a "blanking flange."
a
:;
Ring type joint flanges are used to ensure a leak-proof flange connection at high
pressures. A metal ring is compressed into a hexagonal groove on the face of the flange
to make the seal.
9
719905499
PUBLIC VERSION
Weld-neck and slip-ons are the most common types of flanges. There are also other types of
"special" flanges, which include:
o
Orifice
'W el do
Expander
Reducing
Spectacle '
Groove & Tongue
Flat Face Flanges'
Raised Face Flanges
o
a
o
a
o
fl ange/lll
po
fl an g
However, the sales volumes/values of these specialty flanges are very small in relation to the
more common types such as weld-neck, slip-on, threaded, and so forth.
Steel flanges typical'ly have the following pressure ratings
1
50#
300#
400#
600#
900#
1 500#
2s00#
With 150# and 300# being the most common. The most common facings on machined flanges
are
a
a
a
o
Flat face
Raised face
Tongue and Groove
Ring Joint
,
-,8-,
Flanges are manufactured in many difTrent types of materials, such as alloy steel,
stainless steel, cast iron, aluminum, brass ,btonze,plastic, and others. However, the most
common material is forged carbon steel, produced in accordance with ASTM 4105. Flanges are
l0
719905499
PUBLIC VERSION
A substantial
oil and
gas industry as
connection components for pipes, valves, and pumps used to produce oil and gas. The remainder
is sold to the chemical, wind, pharmaceutical, and other industries as connection components in
piping systems.
As set forth in the scope language at Exhibit 1-3, the scope of this investigation does not
cover flange forgings, which are carbon steel forgings that have not been subject to any further
processing (other than heat treatment).
3.
U.S.
Tariff ClassifTcation
Finished carbon steel flanges are currently classifiable in the following HTSUS
subheading
s:
7307 .91.501
and 7307 .91 .5050. Although the HTSUS subheadings are provided
for convenience and U.S.:Customs & Border Protection purposes, the written description of the
merchandise under investigation is dispositive. Excerpts from the current HTSUS are attached
as
Exhibit I-5. The most-favored nation duty rate for imports under the identified HTSUS
the U.S. Government and do not define the scope of the petitions.
F.
The Names of the Subject Countries and the Name of Any Intermediate
Country Through Which the Merchandise Is Transshipped (19 C.F.R.
s 3s1.202(bxo)
The flanges that are the subject of these petitions are produced in, and exported from,
India, Spain and Italy. Petitioners have no knowledge that the subject merchandise is currently
being transshipped from these countries through any third country to the United States.
11
719905499
PUBLIC VERSION
G.
A list of known producers and exporters of flanges from India is provided in Exhibit I-6.
A list of known producers and exporters of flanges from Spain is provided in Exhibit I-7. A list
of known producers and exporters of flanges from Italy is provided in Exhibit
I-8. In compiling
these exhibits, Petitioners relied upon Internet research and general market knowledge. See
Exhibit I-2.
Information reasonably available to Petitioners does not allow the identification of the
proportion of total exports to the United States accounted for during the most recent l2-month
period by the producers listed in F.'.xhibits
l-6rl-7
and
I-8.
companies listed in Exhibits I-6,1-7, and I-8 account for substantially all exports of the subject
merchandise to the United States from the subject countries.
Similarly, information reasonably available to Petitioners does not allow the calculation
of production capacity, production output, etc. of the producers listed in Exhibits l-6rl-7 and I-
8.
Indeed, Petitioners are simply unaware of any data source (public or otherwise) for that
information.
H.
The volume and value of U.S. imports of flanges from each subject country are presented
at
2013
as the
Commerce. The import data at Exhibit I-9 are provided on both an FOB and a CIF basis.
t6
12
'n9905499
PUBLIC VERSION
These petitions cover the subject merchandise from India, Spain and
largest import sources are China, Germany and Korea, whose 2015 shipments were:
China
7307.9t.5010
16,509,095
7307.9t.5050
5,658,608
9,694,rr3
11,656,987
26,203,208
7307.91.50r0
3,925,62r
7,489,440
7307.91.5050
1,419,337
3,045,909
5,243,958
10,535,349
7307.91.5010
377,393
1,673,569
7307.91.50s0
2,609,047
6,699,839
2,985,440
8,373,408
Total
Korea
Total
Germany
Total
Value
Quantity
5,998,379
importers of flanges from the subject countries is provided in Exhibit I-10. This list was
compiled from general knowledge of the market, Internet research and PIERS data. Petitioners
have undertaken their best fforts in preparing
Exhibit I-10.
names and addresses, we were able to locate emails andlor phone numbers for each importer.
Petitioners believe, however, that there may be a number of importers of flanges from the
subject countries that cannot be identified from publicly available information. Accordingly,
Petitioners respectfully request that the Department obtain this information from U.S. Customs
:l
Petitioners do not have any direct knowledge as to whether any of the other identified
domestic producers of flanges (Exhibit I-1) import the subject merchandise, or flange forgings
into the United States. Neither Petitioner imports finished flanges. However, I
13
719905499
PUBLIC VERSION
II.
il
related to the countervailable subsidies provided by the Government of India with respect to the
:
uI.
A.
Introduction
Dumped and subsidized imports of flanges from India, Spain, and Italy have already
caused material injury to the domestic industry
more injury going forward.lT The volume of subject imports increased by 27 percent between
I percent.
See
Exhibit I-11.
Subject imports captured this increase in market share at the expense of the domestic producers.
Although subject import market share decreased slightly in the first quarter of 2016 as compared
as shown by the
already taken significant market share from U.S. producers. Information reasonably available to
the Petitioners indicates that the surge in market share was accomplished through systematic
underselling. The combination of underselling by subject imports and a decline in U.S. demand
contributed to a decline in pricing over the period of investigation ("POI"). Subject imports
t7
Because Weldbend arid Boltex account for more fhan 50Yo of domestic production of the subject carbon
steel flanges (see Exhibit I-15), the refer to them as either "Petitioners," "the domestic producers," the "U.S,
t4
719905499
PUBLIC VERSION
suppressed and depressed prices for the domestic like product, under increasingly unfavorable
demand conditions.
Subject imports have had a significant harmful impact on the domestic industry. Due to
increased import penetration and underselling by imports, virtually all of the Petitioners' trade
and financial indicators have declined. See
demand, the domestic industry has increasingly lost market share due to the underselling by
'
] in their market share. However, in 2015, U.S. producers' U.S. shipment volume was
just over t
I This t
corresponded to a
] percentage point market share increase for subject imports, which also
took market share from non-subject imports. In the first quarter of 2076, subject import volume
and share declined only slightly, and retained almost all of the market share gained in 2015.
The increasing volumes of low-priced imports that continually undercut U.S. producer
prices resulted in significant financial deterioration of the U.S. industry. The decline in U.S.
the
ratio
percent in January-March, 2016. See Exhibit I-11. The causal link between imports and U.S.
producers' financial performance is fuither corroborated by significant instances of lost sales and
revenues provided by the domestic producers. See
l5
71990s499
Exhibitl-12.
PUBLIC VERSION
Thus, the domestic industry has suffered material injury by reason of the subject imports,
as manifested
in market shate lost to the unfair imports, depressed and suppressed U.S. prices,
Subject imports also threaten the domestic industry with further material injury. Because
its financial performance was adversely affected by the subject imports during the POI, the
.l
domestic flange industry is cunently vulnerable to injury by imports. The rapid and dramatic
increase in the market share of subject imports demonstrates the ability of the subject imports to
enter the U.S. market rapidly, and in large quantities. The subject imports have also had
demonstrable negative price effects, as the rising market share of subject imports forced
domestic producers to lower their prices in an attempt to avoid further loss of market share and
capacity utilization. Producers of flanges in the subject countries have both substantial capaciy
and substantial excess capacity.ls This substantial unused capacity
exports to the United States even further. Taken together, these factors
if
not impossible, for the domestic flange industry to generate the level of profit necessary to fund
research and development and to make capital investments needed to remain competitive unless
trade relief is granted. Indeed, as shown further below, the statutory factors that the Commission
is required to consider demonstrate that subject imports threaten the domestic industry with
further material injury. In the absence of trade relief, subject imports will continue pouring into
this market, causing additional harm to the U.S. industry.
B.
ooa
absence of like, most similar in characteristics and uses with, the article subject to an
It
See
Exhibit
1-2
T6
719905499
PUBLIC VERSION
investigation.le The Commission generally considers a number of factors in defining the like
product, including physicallcharactsristics and uses, interchangeability, channels of distribution,
customer and producer perceptions, common manufacturing facilities, production processes and
employees, and, where appropriate, price. See,
States, 19 CIT
450,455 (1995). No single factor is dispositive and the Commission's decision regarding the
appropriate like product is a factual determination made on a case-by-case basis. The
Commission looks for clear defining lines between products, but disregards minor variations.
The domestic like product here is identical to the definition of the subject merchandise
and also consists of finished flanges.
example,
Taking the seven common flange types identified in section I.E.2 above' as an
size, etc., they all
while each flange type may be in a different configuration in terms of shape,
and
by customers and
in fact to the same distributors), they are all universally known and identified
facilities, using the
producers alike as being flanges, they are all made in the same manufacturing
was a petitioner in the case
same production processes and employees. Indeed, Weldbend
covers, in relevant part:
against Carbon Steel Butt Weld Pipe Fittings. The scope in that case
.,carbon steel butt-weld pipe fittings, having an inside diameter of less than 14 inches"
'"
Like
l9
1e
u.s.c. $ 1677(lo).
t7
719905499
PUBLIC VERSION
C.TheDomesticlndustryConsistsofAllU.S.ProducersofFlanges
SectionTTl(4XA).oftheActdefinestherelevantindustryasthe.oproducetsasawholeof
of a domestie like product
producers whose co[ective output
those
or
product,
like
a domestic
product'"2. Based on the
domestic production of the
the totar
constitutes a major proportion of
consists of all
above, the domestic industry
domestic rike product defined
u's'
producers of
flanges
D.SubjectlmportsSurpasstheStatutoryNegligibilityThreshold
Importsofflangesfromlndia,spain,andltaly,onanindividualcountrybasis,surpass
from a subject country
by the statute' By law' imports
the negligibility threshold established
such
for less than three percent of all
account
that
product
like
corresponding to a domestic
for which dataarc
during the most recent 12 months
states
united
the
to
merchandise imported
import volumes from
are deemed negligible.2t u.s.
petition
the
of
filing
the
available preceding
(May 2015 through April 2016)'
most recent l2 month period
the
during
countries
the subject
1 below'
imports' are set forth in Table
and their percentage of total
TABLE
tons
58
15
11
1
I'9
20
le u.s.c, $ 1677(4XA)'
2l
le u.s.c. $ 16??(24XAXi)
18
719905499
Imports
PUBLIC VERSION
a
Accordingly, imports of flanges from each of the three subject countries are not negligible within
the meaning of 19 U.S.C.,$ 1677(24)( )(i).
E.
Section 771(7XGXi) of the Act requires the Commission to cumulatively assess the
volume and effect of imports of the subject merchandise from all countries with respect to which
petitions were filed underlsecti on 732(b)on the same day, if such imports compete with each
other and with the domestic like product in the United States.22 The statutory factors mandating
a cumulative analysis are met in this case.
Specifically, petitions against flange imports from India, Spain, and ltaly are being filed
simultaneously. Further, none of the statutory exceptions to cumulation applies in this
"use.t3
imports is mandatory.
a. '
Flange imports from India, Spain, and Italy Spain are generally substitutable with each
other and with the domestio like product. Imports from each of the subject countries are
generally made by the same processes on similar equipment, and generally have the same
chemical and physical properties, as the domestic like product.2a
22
le U,S.c. $ 1677(7XgXi).
23
le U.S.C. $ 1677(TXeXii).
See Exhibit l-2.
24
t9
719905499
PUBLIC VERSION
b.
Imports from each of the subject countries compete with imports from the other subject
countries and with the domestic trike product throughout the U.S. market. Exhibit I-13 shows
significant overlap among the subject countries with respect to the ports into which they entered
the United States in 2015iand the first quarter of 2016. For example, ports of entry where
,:
imports from all three sources were present during this period accounted for 83 percent of total
subject import volume during this period. Flanges produced in the United States and imported
c.
Distribution
A large share of flanges, whether produced in the United States or imported, are sold
through distributors, rather than directly to end users. Based on its knowledge of competition in
the market, Petitioners believe that imports from each of the subject countries are purchased by
many, if not all, of the same distributors. See
Exhibitl-2.
share from the domestic industry, providing compelling evidence that some customers have
switched their purchases from the domestic like product to subject imports. This factor also
supports cumulation of the subject imports.
r'
d.
Market
Imports of flanges from each of the subject countries entered the United States in every
year during the POI. See Exhibit
in the U.S. market throughout the POI. Thus, this factor provides further evidence that subject
imports are competing with each other and the domestic like product.
20
719905499
PUBLIC VERSION
Conclusion
Both domestically-produced and imported flanges, whether imported from India, Spain,
or Italy, are fungible products that are produced to standard industry specifications and compete
directly against one another. Imports from each of the subject countries and the domestic
product are sold through the same distribution channels, primarily to distributors, and are sold in
'.
the same geographic markets. Imports from each subject country and U.S.-produced flanges
:,
have been simultaneously present in the U.S. market in each of the POI years. Moreover, the
U.S. market for flanges is highly price-sensitive, with competition occurring between imports
and domestic producers for sales on the basis of
conclusion that there is a reasonable overlap of competition between the subject imports and the
domestic like product within the meaning of the statute. Accordingly, the Commission should
cumulate imports of flanges from India, Spain, and ltaly in analyzing whether subject imports
have caused material injury to the domestic industry in this case.
F'.
In determining whether the domestic industry has been injured by reason of the imports
under investigation, the statute directs the Commission to consider: (1) the volume of imports
of
the subject merchandise; (2) the effect of imports of that merchandise on prices in the United
States for the domestic like product;
an
domestic producers in the context of production operations within the United States. Information
reasonably available to Petitioners indicates unfairly traded imports from India, Spain and Italy
have been, and continue to be, a cause of material injury to the domestic industry producing
flanges
2l
719905499
PUBLIC VERSION
In evaluating the volume of imports, the Commission must consider whether the volume
of imports of the merchandise,
otr
U.S. consumption and production, is significant within the meaning of the relevant statutory
provlslon.
a.
The absolute volume of subject imports from India, Italy and Spain is significant.
Subject imports totaled 201,822 thousand pounds and accounted for over 81 percent of total steel
flange imports in 2015. Se Exhibit
I-9.
on an
absolute basis between the interim periods, the volume of subject imports was still significant
and subject imports continued to account for the overwhelming majority of total imports.
Subject imports' share of total imports remained virtually unchanged at 81 percent in the interim
periods. Id. Further, the decline in subject import volume in interim 2016 in large part reflects a
significant decline in demand, and as discussed below, subject imports retained a significant
share of the market.
25
le u.s.c. $ 1677(7XCXi)
22
7t9905499
PUBLIC VERSION
b.
The volume of subject imports is also significant relative to consumption. The increase
in subject import market share came at the expense of the domestic flange industry. The
domestic industry's share of the market fell by
share gains made in 2015. That is, in January-March 2016 subject imports share of the U.S.
market was
] percentage points higher than in 2014, and U.S. producers' share of the
market was
] percentage points lower between these periods. These data establish that both
the volume of subject imports and the increase in imports were significant both absolutely and
Z.
The low-priced, dumped and subsidized imports subject to this proceeding have had
significant negative price effects on the domestic flange industry. Price underselling by unfairlytraded imports of flanges from India, Spain, and Italy have significantly depressed and
suppressed the prices at
a,
'
Evidence reasonably available to Petitioner indicates that the increase in market share by
the subject imports coincided with significant underselling by subject imports, which serves as
important evidence that subject imports have had negative price effects. Based on the lost sale
and lost revenue examples, import prices show declines over the POI, as well as widespread and
23
719905499
PUBLIC VERSION
significant underselling of U.S. producers' prices. See Exhibit I-12. This underselling by
imports from subject counJries caused U.S. producers to lose substantial sales and to reduce
prices, causing loss of revenue.
b. ;
The volume gains by producers from India, Italy and Spain in the U.S. flange market
have been achieved by underselling the prices of U.S. producers. Underselling by unfairly
traded imports of flanges has significantly suppressed and depressed the prices at which
domestic producers sell flanges. Because of the wide variety of flange types sold, average unit
values on a $/lb basis for total shipments may not be indicative of price trends, as these changes
can also reflect product mix changes. However, information assembled by Petitioners for a
specific high-volume flange specification shows that on a per-piece basis, prices have declined
from 2013 levels. See Exhibit I- 14. These price declines occurred as subject imports continued
to enter the U.S. market and materially undersold the domestic producers' prices. Moteover,
U.S. producers also experienced price suppression, as their COGS to sales ratio I
price depression and suppression exerted by the subject imports on domestic producers' ptices,
combined with volume losses as subject imports gained market share, led to a deterioration of
U.S. producers' profitability levels, and U.S. producers experienced operating I
24
7t9905499
PUBLIC VERSION
c.
207,11(bX2Xiv), Petitioners reommend that the Commission collect pricing data on the
PRODUCT
1:
PRODUCT
2:
PRODUCT
3:
PRODUCT
4:
PRODUCT
5:
PRODUCT
6:
(16 1s0 RF
\ilN STD)
These price descriptors represent large-volume and representative types flanges sold in the
United States during the POI and also are believed to represent specifications sold for subject
imports.26 Accordingly, these are the appropriate products for the Commission's analysis and
comparison of U.S. producer and import prices.
3.
The domestic flange industry has suffered material injury by reason of the subject
imports, as manifested in sales lost to the unfair imports and suppressed and depressed U.S.
26
Because of the large numbpr of flange types sold, the coverage of total shipments will necessarily be
relatively low based on using only six pricing product specifications.
25
719905499
PUBLIC VERSION
prices, resulting in the deteriorati'on of key trade and financial indicators. Subject imports have
undersold domestically-produced flanges, resulting in price suppression and depression, lost
sales, and financial deterioration, as evidenced in Petitioners' inadequate and I
demonstrate a causal linklbetween the unfairly traded imports and the material injury being
suffered by the U.S. industry producing flanges.
a, ;
From 2013 to 2015,the subject imports had a negative impact on the domestic industry,
as demonstrated
and
by
profitability. Production
commercial shipments
workers
See
Exhibit
] (l
[
I
I-ll.
] thousand pounds ([
(l
I percent'
Although declining demand had some effect on the U.S. industry in2015,
1)
competition from subject imports clearly had a material adverse effect, as demonstrated by:
the domestic industry's loss of market share to subject imports; 2) underselling and declining
U.S. prices; and 3) lost sales and revenues.
The domestic industry's condition for all indicia continued to decrease in interim 2016.
to 2015), subject imports' share of the market was still significantly higher than in 2013 and
].
domestic production of flanges
26
719905499
] percent,
PUBLIC VERSION
its lowest level of the POI. See Exhibit I-11. The value of the domestic industry's commercial
shipments
] percent and
capacity utilization caused by the displacement of U.S. producer sales from unfairly-traded
subject imports demonstrates that Petitioners have ample capacity to supply finished flanges to
meet customers' requirements.
'
b.
The deteriorating financial performance of the domestic flange industry reflects the
combination of adverse volume and price effects resulting from competition from unfairly traded
imports from the subject countries. Before the market share increase in subject imports that
began in 2015, the domestic industry had experienced operating profit margins
of I
of
], declines
]'
] its level in the prior two years, and in interim 20I6,the U.S. industry
continued to experience anemic sales volumes as subject imports' share of the market remained
high, and combined with price declines from 2015 levels, operating profits were
a
margin of
2015.27 See
] percent,'compared to the t
], with
Exhibit I-11.
27
The signihcant decline in volume also led to higher unit fixed costs, which contributed to the declines in
gross and operating profits on a unit and margin basis.
27
719905499
PUBLIC VERSION
declining sales prices and revenue resulting from increased volumes of unfairly priced imports.
.'
c.
The existence of a,causal link between rising import market share and U.S. producers'
declining profits and market share is corroborated by the anecdotal lost sales and revenue
information collected and attached as Exhibitl-12. This exhibit identifies lost sales (and thus
loss revenue) to unfairly traded flange imports from the subject countries. Specifically,
it
consists of affidavits from the presidents of both Weldbend and Boltex about their companies'
lost sales to imports from the subject countries during the POI. This evidence of lost sales and
revenues ties the financial performance of the domestic industry to the injurious price and
Unlike many other industries/products that are examined by the Commission, the
merchandise subject to these investigations is not sold by the manufacturers directly to end user
customers. Instead, flanges are by domestic and foreign producers to distributors, who then sell
to end users. The U.S. distributors purchase from both the domestic producers and the foreign
producers. As such, it is very difficult for Petitioners to obtain specific and direct facts of lost
sales
because
(because
they buy from both sources). As such, Petitioners acted to the best of their ability, and indeed it
was difficult, for them to obtain the information provided in
Exhibitl'12'
In addition, Petitioners have completed the Lost Sales Template as specified in the
Commission's Handbook on Filing Procedures and includes those templates at Exhibit l'12
28
719905499
as
PUBLIC VERSION
well.
will
also be submitted
4.
Conclusion
of subject
imports was significant both absolutely and relatively, and their market penetration increased
dramatically over the POI. The subject imports reached their highest levels of market
penetration in 2015, and maintained close to this level in the first quarter of
20.
The subject
imports systematically undersold the domestic product, causing domestic prices to fall. The
domestic industry experienced
G.
[
[
] in its
rate.
Industry
:
In addition to analyzing present material injury, the statute requires the Commission to
determine whether the domestic industry is threatened with material injury by reason of the
unfair imports.2s In making this determination, the Commission is directed to examine a number
(l)
productive capacity or existing unused capacity; (2) a significantrate of increase of the volume
or market penetration of the subject imports; and (3) the likelihood that imports of the subject
merchandise are entering at prices that will have a significant depressing or suppressing effect on
domestic prices.2e As indicated below, there is ample evidence that imports of flanges from the
28
29
le u.s.c. $1677(7XF).
le u.s.c. $ 1677(7XFX
29
7t9905499
PUBLIC VERSION
subject countries also present a threat of massive and imminent further material injury to the
domestic industry.
1.
The statute provides that in evaluating the threat of material injury, the Commission may
cumulatively assess the volume and price effects of imports of the subject merchandise from all
countries with respect to which the petitions were filed on the same day
"if
with each other and with domestic like products in the United States market."3O As these
petitions cover all of the subject countries, the first requirement is met. Further, as demonstrated
above, all subject imports compete with each other and with the domestic like product in the U.S.
market. Thus, the statutory requirements for cumulation in a threat investigation have been
satisfied.
2.
Material Injury
In determining whether subject imports threaten a domestic industry with material injury,
the Commission must consider a number of factors, including
o
o
o
In this case, all of these factors support an affirmative threat determination' The Commission
should find that the domestic industry is vulnerable, and that the subject imports threaten the
domestic flange industry with material injury.
30
3t
re u.s.c. $ 1677(7XI.I).
1e
u.s.c. $ 1677(7XFXi),
30
719905499
PUBLIC VERSION
a.
The starting point for the Commission's assessment of threat is the question of whether
:
the domestic industry is vulnerable to material injury by reason of the subject imports.32 To
assess
vulnerability, the Commission will consider the various indicators of performance for the
industry. The Commission gives special weight to the industry's performance at the end of the
POI.33
The domestic flange industry is extremely vulnerable to further material injury by reason
of the subject imports. As explained above, U.S. producers are experiencing a significant loss of
domestic market share, and significant
and reductions in gross and operating
due to the declines in the
oil and
decline in demand for flanges in 2015 and into 2016. As such, the increasing and significant
losses to imports, at a time of declining overall demand, makes the increasing loss of market
share
untenable.
Accordingly, the Commission should determine that the domestic flange industry is
vulnerable to material injury by reason of the subject imports.
b.
The Act provides thatooasignificant rate of increase of the volume or market penetration
of imports of the subject mrchandise" shall be considered in determining whether the domestic
32
See Seamless Refined Cbpper and Tube from China and Mexico. Inv. Nos. 731-TA-l174'1175
lf inat,UStrc fuU. 4l% atZ+ Nv. ZOtO) ("seamless Refined Copper and Tube from China and Mexico") at 34i
ertan Seamless Carbon and Ailp) Steel Standard. Line" and Pressure Pipe from China. Inv, Nos. 701-TA-469 and
73 1-TA- I 168 (Final), USITC Pub. 4 190 at 27 -28 (Nov. 2010).
33
Seamless Reflrned Copper and Tube from China and Mexico. USITC Pub' 4193 at34.
31
't9905499
PUBLIC VERSION
industry is threatened with material injury from the subject imports,3a In this case, there have
been dramatic increases in both the volume and the market penetration of subject imports over
the
POI.
c.
',
.
The Act provides that, in determining whether the domestic industry is threatened with
material injury, the Commission should consider'owhether imports of the subject merchandise
are entering at prices that are likely to have a significant depressing or suppressing effect on
domestic prices, and are likely to increase demand for further imports."35 The discussion above
demonstrates that subject imports have had such effects. In particular, the rise in U.S. market
share taken by the subject imports has led to a sharp decline in prices for the domestic product.
the domestic like product, it is likely that the fall in domestic prices will continue. Thus, this
statutory factor shows that the domestic industry is threatened with additional material injury
d.
''
"if
a countervailable subsidy
Article 3 or 6.1" of the WTO Agreement on Subsidies and Countervailing Measur.t.36 Atticle
of the WTO Subsidies Agreement describes subsidies that are prohibited because they are
34
35
36
u,s.c. $ 1677(7xFX(.
32
719905499
PUBLIC VERSION
contingent upon export performance or upon the use of domestic over imported goods.37 As
demonstrated in these petitions, subject producers in India have received countervailable
subsidies, including export subsidies and import substitution subsidies. Among the more
.. '
)
The Act provides that in making a threat determination, the Commission shall consider
ooany
capacity in the exporting country indicating the likelihood of substantially increased imports."38
The Commission
will
also consider whether other export markets are available to the subject
producers that could absorb excess production.3e In this case, the availability of capacity for
increased exports to the United States weighs heavily in favor of a threat determination.a0
'i
3?
Agreement on Subsidies and Countervailing Measures (Apr. 15, 1994), Manakesh Agreement Establishing
the World Trade Organization, Annex l, 1867 U.N.T.S. 14 aI Art.3.
38
3s
40
u.s.c. $ l67z(7XF)(iXII).
19 u.s.c, $ 1677(7XFX(il).
19
g99 Chlorinated Isoc)Anurates from China and Japan. USITC Pub.4494 at 36; Polyethvlene Retail Carrier
Bags from Indonesia. Taiwan. and Vietnam. Inv. Nos. 701-TA-462 and 731-TA-1156-1158 (Final), USITC Pub.
4144 at 25 -26 (April 20 1 0).
JJ
7t9905499
PUBLIC VERSION
According to the o\ryner and president of Weldbend, as well as the president and chairman
of the board of Boltex, it is believed that the producers of flanges in India, Italy and Spain are
currently producing at levels well below their capacity. See Exhibit
demand caused by the decline in the
means that
I-2.
at anywhere near
capacity. As a result, the subjeot producers have the ability to increase exports to the United
States significantly without encountering any capacity constraints. However,
it is simply not
possible for Petitioners to document the capacity or export capabilities of the foreign producers.
They simply do not have access to that information, and there is no known source of such
information (public or otherwise).
f. '
summary
unfair imports from India, Italy and Spain. As difficult as the current situation may be, if recent
trends persist, the domesticrindustry is threatened with an even bleaker future. The subject
producers have demonstrated their ability to rapidly increase exports to the United States of
extremely low-priced flaiges that undersell domestic producers by substantial margins. In light
of the recent trends in pricing of urlfair imports, producers and exporters in India, Italy and Spain
are likely to continue their low-priced, high volume assault on the U.S. market absent the
IV.
CONCLUSION
The information presented in these petitions provides evidence reasonably available to
Petitioners that imports of flanges from India, Spain and Italy are being sold in the United States
at less than fair value and that the Government of India is providing countervailable subsidies
34
7t9905499
PUBLIC VERSION
with respect to the manufacture, production, and export of flanges. These petitions further
provide evidence that the domestic industry producing flanges has been materially injured, and is
threatened with material injury, by reason of unfairly-traded imports. Accordingly, Petitioners
request that the U.S. Depafment of Commerce and the U.S. International Trade Commission
initiate antidumping duty investigations regarding imports of flanges from India, Italy and Spain
.
Respectfully
M. Kriesberg
J
abian Rivelis
Sr.
MAYER BROWN
Counsel to Weldbend Corporation &
Boltex Mfg. Co., L.P.
3s
7
t9905499
EXHIBIT LIST
I
t-2
I-3
Scope
t-4
Production
I-5
HTSUS
I-6
Indian Produoers
r-7
Spanish Producers
I-8
Italian Producers
I-9
US Import Statistics
I-10
US Importers
I I1
Injury Indicators
t-t2
I-13
Geographic Overlap
-r4
Pricing Data
I- 15
25%150% Rules
719905499
r-1
(P
etitioner)
coulas@weldbsnd. co.nl
Houston, TX770l3
www.boltex.cqm
T: (713) 67s 9433
Fax: (713) 6726521
f berpobi ch@el teX;pom
Galperti Inc
160 Southbelt Industrial Dr
Houston, TX77047
T: (713) 433-0700
Faz: (713) 433-5580
s,lpra ail.@ g lp c.rt i.riircb rn
AFGlobal Corporation
945 Bunker Hill Road
Suire 500
Houston, TX77024
www.afslobalcoro.com
T:713-393-4200
Texas Flange
PO Box 2889
Pearland, TX 77588
www. txi s fl angg, c-qnl
T:281-741-1195
Fax: 281-484-8730
S al cs().tex a sfl a rt ge. c om
Piping Products,Inc.
1681 Kress St.
Houston, TX 77420
www,pipin qproducts.com
T: (713) 675 5374
Fax: (713) 675 7910
I of 3
720084884
Buffalo Flange,Inc.
P,O. Box 34890
Houston. TX77234-4890
.www, bufflo f Ian,ge, conl
r:
Kerkau Manufacturing
1321 S Valley Center Dr
Bay City, MI48706
www,kefkrl.com.
T: (989) 686 0350
Fax: (989) 686 0399
bii*adbmis@"I<rrliirrr',jpjrn
Coastal Flange
1 1906 FM 529
Jersey Village, TX 77041
!aWW. oastal fl an ge. com
T: (800) 6439063
Fax: (713) 937 3471
saleg@coasiaifleR p;n
www,tri-lad.com
T: (800) 969 ss6s
Fax: (713) 7991007
avela@allieclfit.com
swool ey@"all iedfit. corn
2 of3
720084884
Federal Flange
Physical Address:
4014 Pinemont
Houston, Texas 77018
P,O. Box 925097
Houston, Texas 7 7 292-5097
:www,
.- federalflnile;com
T: (713) 681 0606
Fax: (713) 681 3005
infot@fedefafft $r se;aonl
O"
Corporation
"r"rr"
7785F..
Little York Road
Houston, TX''17016
wooDco usA
P.O. Box 1261
Houston, Texas 77251 -L261
www,woodcousa.com
T: (713) 672 9491
Fax: (713) 6728768
$ofiot-ii$r o
3 of
720084884
T-2
\ryE,LDBEI{I)
1.
2,
3.
4.
5,
6.
My parents started Weldbend Corporation back in the late 1940's, and the
company has grown to become one of the largest, if not the largest, manufacturer
of finished carbon steel flanges in the United States.
I began working for the farnily business in 1967, and have thus been in the
finished carbon steel flanges business for over 49 years,
During my almost five decades in the finished carbon steel flanges business, I
have visited the facilities of several other domestic producers of finished carbon
steel flanges, and have visited foreign producers ofthe product in Spain, Italy, and
India.
On an almost weekly basis at its Argo, Illinois facility, Weldbend Corporation
hosts customers and end users of finished carbon steel flanges.
The number of companies producing finished carbon steel flanges is quite small,
and these companies are well-known to those in the industry.
To my knowledge, there is no public information on U.S. production capacity or
ouut of finished carbon steel flanges.
8,
9,
10.
11.
720570lt7.2
assisted in the preparation of Exhibit I-1 of the petition, which identifies known
domestic producers of finished carbon steel flanges, and I believe that the list of
14 companies identifies the vast majority of all finished carbon steel flange
producers in the United States.
The first two companies listed in Exhibit I-l of the petition are Weldbend and
Boltex Mfg. Co., and I am very conficlent that those two companies (the
t2.
12tJ570817.2
BOLTEX
Dnqlr\ttAliorN oti
I, Flank Bernobich, president and chairman of the board of l3oltex Mfg, Co., L.P
('olloltex") (a Petitioner in this action), hereby certify and aff,rrm as follows:
Whereas,
Boltex began as a machining operation in 1989, and started forging its own line of
flanges in 1996.
2
3
I have been with Boltex since its inception, anc1, inch.rding my time at Boltex, I
have over 39 yeals ofexpelience in the carbon steel flanges busjness.
During my almost four decades in the carbon steel flanges business, I liavc visited
the facilities cf sevetal other dourestic producers of'lnished carbon steel langes,
and have visited frrreigu producers of the product in ltaly, India, Germany and
France.
4
5
l.he number of. companies proclucing flrnisl:ed. carbon steel flanges is quite small,
and these companics are well-known to those in the industry,
To my knowledge, there is no public information on U.S. procluction capacity or
output offinished carbon steel flanges,
10.
11.
12.
assisted in the preparation ol'Exhibit I-1 of the petition, which identifies known
clomestic produccrs of finished carbon steel fl,anges, and I believe ilrat the list of
l4 companies identifies the vast nrajorty of all finished carbon steel flange
20i
51,9.1.1
I declare thal all statements made above are true and correct,
"96- 7//.
Date
;2(i 5 759,i.2
Ilernobich
r-3
SCOPE
The scope of this investigation covers finished carbon steel flanges. Finished carbon
steel flanges differ frorn unfinished carbon steel flanges (also known as carbon steel flange
forgings) in that they have undergone further processing afler forging, which can include
beveling, bore threading, center or step boring, face machining, recoining or resizing, taper
boring, machining ends or surfaces other than a gasket face, drilling bolt holes, and/or de-burrirrg
or shot blasting. Any one of these post-forging processes suffices to render the forging into
fnished carbon steel flange for purposes of these petitions. However, mere heat treatment of a
carbon steel flange forging (without any other further processing after forging) cloes not render
the forging into a finished carbon steel flange for putposes of these petitions.
While these finished carbon steel flanges are generally manufactured to specifcation
ASME 816.5 or ASME 816,41series A or series B, the scope is not limited to flanges produced
under those specifications. A1l types of finished carbon steel flanges are included in the scope,
regardless of pipe size (usually expressecl in inches of nominal pipe size), pressure class (usually
expressecl in pounds ofpressure, e.g., 150, 300,400, 600, 900, 1500, 2500, etc.), type offace
full face, raised facc, ctc.), confguration (e.g., weld neck, slip on, socket weld,
joint, threaded, etc.), wall thickness (usually expressed in inches), and normalization or heat
treatment (which may not always be used). The carbon steel usecl to produce fnishcd carbotr
steel flanges includes, but is not limitecl to, carbon steel produced to ASTM 4105 and ASTM
4694 standards.
Finished carbon steel flanges are currently classified under subheading 7307 .91.5010 and
7307.91,5050 of the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the Unitecl States (HTStlS). They may also
be entered under
7200349.0
subheadings are provided for convenience and customs purposes; the written description of the
scope is dispositive.
720014910
2.
J.
4.
Boltex began as a machining operation in 1989, and starled forging its own line of
flanges in 1996.
I have been with Boltex since its inception, and, including my time at Boltex, I
have over 39 years ofexperience in the carbon steel flanges business.
During my ahnost four decades in the finished carbon steel flanges business, I
have visited the facilities of several other domestic producers of finished carbon
steel flanges, and have visited foreign producers of the product in ltaly, Inclia,
Accordingly, I provide the below description of the production process for finished carbon steel
flanges:
5
6
7
8
9
10
ll
12
l3
l4
15.
16.
17
The cut billet piece is then pushed into the forging press where it is located on the
blocking station, the ploper grain orientation is checked and the operator signals
the press to block or break the piece into its pre forging shape (see photo 5).
This blocking operation also improves the mechanical propcrties of the material
being forged.
The "blocked" piece is then moved to the next set of forging dies (see photo 6)
where it is shaped to its approximate final appearance.
It is then conveyed to the trim press (see photo 7) where it receives it final
shaping and all excess material is trimmed off the part.
In larger forgings, where the excess material has tlie sufficient weight and size,
that material undcrgoes the same process once more to produce a second forging.
Once these parts are completely folged, the parts are loaded into steel containers
for controlled still air cooling and are sent to post forging heat treatrnent (see
photo 8).
Page 1 of 9
t208l8t
52
18,
79,
20,,
2L
22.
23.
24,,
25.
Post forging heat treatment (see photo 8) is requirecl for parts that must achieve
certain mechanical properties or grain structure to prevent failure during their
final use.
To be heat-treated, the items are stacked on pallets and placed in ovens where
they are heated to temperature, held or "soaked" for a predetermined period of
time. The parts are either still air cooled or immediately placed in a controlled
temperature (quenched) water tank where their temperature is rapidly reduced.
These parts are again allowed to cool to ambient temperature and then reloaded
into the ovens to be heat treated (tempered) another time to assure optimal
mechanical properties and material hardness is achieved. Once cooled these parts
are completed forgings (see photo 9).
photo 17).
Photo 2-LoadingTable
Photo 3
Page 3 of 9
720818t52
Page 4 of 9
720818152
Picture9-CompletedF
Photo 11
Photo 12 - First machining operation. Machining front fact and intemal diameter
Page 6 of 9
7208r8rs2
Photo 13 -Second
PageT
'720818152
of9
Photo l5
Photo 16 - Painting
Page 8 of 9
720818t52
Photo
l7'-
(-z/- zo/
atc
Page 9
?20il8t52
of9
r-5
of
Quanlity
Subheding
XV
73"19
2
---mial
prpe
iron or steel:
Cast fittngs:
1
4.8%
1.00
Secil
30
dq
Other:
For cast-ron soil pipe............
kg
Other
I9
kg
Other:
45%
Free (4, AU, BH,
CA, CL, CO, E, IL,
JO, KR, MA, MX,
OM, P, PA, PE,
Ductile f ittings...,".'..:;;r;.',;!i
19.30
sG)
40
Other:
60
Threaded....,,...,,,..,,r.r,.rr,,i,,,1
70
B5
Other................
..........,-.:..:. kg
6.2'/"
O1her....,...-.,..,.,..'.,-;',',..n:;
9.90
kg
30
40
60
BO
Olher:
Grooved-end filtings (including grooved
couplings)........
Other:
Threaded.........,
kg
kg
kg
45%
Article Description
Subheading
fix
7307 (con.)
7307.21
7307.21
.1
0 00
'
Flanges:
Not machined, not tooled and not otherwise
processed af ter f or9in9,..............,.ir........'.,.........'
.21.50 00
SG)
22
22-10 00
22.50 00
45%
Free (A, AU, B, BH,
cA, cL, co, E, lL,
JO, KR, MA, MX,
OM, P, PA, PE,
Other,.,.....:,.
SG)
00
5Y"
.29.00
Othr,.,..,,,...,..
sG)
30
Nipp1es..,.,....,..,.j;i.!...J,!:,r,rr,
90
ttror,.,
XV
73-21
Artcle Descriplion
3.3%
91.30
00
3.2%
ol
91.50
33%
Free (A', AU, BH,
CA, CL, CO, E, IL,
JO, MA, MX, OM,
P, PA, PE, SG)
1.6% (KF)
(A-, AU, B,
cA, cL, co, E, lL,
JO, MA, MX, OM,
P, PA, PE, SG)
7%(KR)
10
30
70
.92
10
30
92.90 00
Sleeves (coupl
Of iron or nonalloy steel
Of alloy steel (excepl stainless steel).....
Other....................
73-22
ol
Article Descriptn
Subheading
7 (co
.93
6.2%
4.2%(KR)
10
40
kg
Other.......,...,..,..i..,i.i.......,.,..,......,.r,;.!i.
kg
9,"t
454
7%(KR].
Free (4, AU, B, BH, 45%
.93.90
10
40
60
99.10 00
kg
ks
25%
99
00
kg
33%
4.3/"
Other,,..,..,..,.,.-.1i*.i,,r,P.:;',,i'rf ,,,/{,:.'
sG)
Ol iron or nonalloy steel:
15
45
60
Nipples,,;.;..".,...;.....,....'..'..,..'r',",,.,'..,..
kg
Other.............................
kg
kg
I-6
B-4L0
New Friends Colony
New Delhi- L10025 lndia
Tel: +0091-9811026487
Ph
Fax: 91-LL-25135759
www.uskfl.com
Corum Flange
708 DLF Galleria, DLF City Phase - lV,
Gurgaon, I22OO2, Haryana, lndia
Tel:+91" 1"24-4287243
http://www. corumfla nse:co m
(22)2283I83I
MantriAvenue
wwwrechiy;com:
Pashan Panchwati
R.N. Gupta & Co. Ltd.
Unit-ll G.T Road, Tehsil Payal, Doraha
Pune 411008
Ludhia na-14142l.
TeI: +9L-20-326A-9544
INDIA A1
lndia
Tel: +009L-161-5246900
www.rnqupta.sgm
ROLLWELL FORGE PVT. [TD.
5th Floor,
E-Ma il chw(chwforqe.com
Shubhash Road,
RAJKOT 360 001 (Gujarat ) lndia
www. ro lULe I lfo rFe.co m
ma
rketine@rollwellfgfee.com
9810078360
lephone : +9I-\20-2895404
Fax No : +9L-11-51628301
Te
R. D. Forge
CHW Forge
1"
7
20s637 58
of
ATLENA GROUP
C-l-1.6, Phase-7, lndustrial Area,
SteelShape lndia
ManojSharma
+9L-8049462663
C-167/L, Site No. L, lndustrialArea, B, S. Road
Ghaziabad - 201009
Uttar Pradesh, lndia
Email lD:
business.developmenta llena @gmail.com
Website : WWW.allenaa utoindqs_tres.on
Ludhiana-14LL20 lndia.
+9L-16L-25L101L, 2511000
htt p : //www,sudhi rforsi nss.co m/
The Punjab SteelWorks (PSW)
B-38, Mayapuri lndustrial Area, Phase 1,
New Delhi- 110064 (lndia)
+ 9L - 1L - 41013400 / 4L833668 / 41833778
Alloyed Steel
93, Bhandari street , Ground floor,
Room no. 3
pswfgree@Vahoo.conJ
h
tt
; { /WWW.
swfo rgg
n 1o
r.n b'.a
nv," ri
Email : alloyedsteels@gmail.com
Tel :+9L- 22-66151.863 / 66151864
rof i .
I
psw.html
Mob:9867234437
Tirupati Forge
Survey No.92/L, Hadamtala lndustrial Area, Nr.
Shan Cement,
Rajkot Gondal National Highway, Vill,
Hadamtala,
htto://www.tirunatiforee.coml
Rdvi Ratan Metal lndustries
C. D. lndustries
Tel: +91" - 22
B-4L0
New Friends Colony
New Delhi - 110025
0091 9811026487
info@uskfl.com
663941.41.
l.
export(arvirata nmetalindustr.ies.in
Falcon Valves and Flanges Private Limited
Plot No 4, lndira Niwas, Near Nandjyoth
lndustrial Estate, Safedpool, Sakinaka, Andheri Kurla Road, Mumbai, Maharashtra, lndia
http://www.tufind ia.com
http://www. uskfl.com/
2of3
720s637 58
DN Forge lndustries
Hem Villa, 1,7, Bhakti Nagar Station Plot
Beside Ajit Engineering Works
Rajkot - 360001-
HEUBACH INTERNATIONAT
Gujarat, lndia
2nd Kumbharwada,
Mumbai-400 004 (lndia)
Tel:+9L-22-6636 3159, 2380
Sizer lndia
No. L5, Diamond lndustrial Estate No. L, ketki
Pada, Off. W. E, Highway, Dahisar East, Mumbai
- 400068, Maharashtra , lndia
4t2t
Fax:+9L-22-2389 33I1E
m aiI:
HEUBACH INTERNATIONAL
folifbie@Fnlail.ltr
We bsite:
Address:
2L Manipar House,
www.rolexfittings.net
Adinath lnternational
4,Sa nskar lndustra I Estate
Fax:+91" 22
66581621
mahendra@heubachint.com
Ahmedabad, Gujarat
lndia-382415
OM
Te I : +9 1-79-
ma i I : info@adj-04!h..eg"ln
Siddhagiri Metal&Tubes
1.61./L63 DR. M.G. Mahimture Marg
3rd Kumbharwada
Mumbai-400004
Maharashtra, lndia
Tel: +9L-22-2386 5529
Fax +9L-22-6610 9206
i
nfo
@ sid
EXPORTS
Email: sales@omexport,co.in
400004,lndia
+9'J.-22- 2386 2246, +91-22- 6636 3675
3 of 3
-t20563'7
58
r-.7
Ulma Piping
B" Zubillaga, 3 P.O. Box 14
20560 Oati (Gipuzkoa) Spain
Tel: +34 943 78 05 52
Fax: +34 943 78 18 08
www;ulm.aDiping.corq
Grupo Cunado
C/ Camino delOlivar, 2 (Esq. Calle Mxico)
28806 Alcal de Henares
(Madrid)
Tel.: +34 91887 87 00
Fax: +34 9t 887 87 33
wwwigruocunado.com
TUBACERO, S.L.
)g!y!ylgbaggro.e
ATEAC]ONES DE METALES SNTERIZADOS S.A.
AddressCtra Laurea Miro 388 San Feliu De L
Lobregat Spain
sales@ames.es
! /t1vw.ames.es
TRANSGTORY S.A.
9446t6420
b rce
lo?tt
ra n slll o rv, co
CENTRAT Y ALMACENES
infoterupocunado,com
www,eruocujado,com
1ofi.
720018787
r-8
V. Bocche Di Sotto 4
3L010 - Orsago (TV)
Tel:0438 990850
hlto:ilwww,rna
394/396, V. S. Zeno
25124 Brescia (BS)
Italy
Italy
Tel.:030 21,61079
http://www.u nieensteel.com/
Italy
lmore.eoml
BifrangiS.p.A.
Via Alessandro Manzoni, 14
36065 Mussolente Vl
Italy
Tel: +39 0424 838L11"
hft
rtin,ra
$:lltvwwlbifransl ;it/
http://www.corima milano.it/
36011Arsero Vl
Italy
Tel.: +39/04 45/7
31"61"L
tax: +39/0445/74I74L
ht-tn://www.siderforse rossi. com/
C. S.R.L.
-nail: info@rnelsi,lt
Tel.:+39 044573I31.3
Fax: +39 0445 731, 49O
Via Donizetti, 28
26027 - Rivolta D'Adda (CR)
www.forgital.com
Italy
ASFO S.p.A.
FOMAS Group
Via lV Novembre,12
36010 Chiuppano (Vl)
Italy
Tel: +39 0445 805290
Fax: +39 0445 805299
Email : asfo (dfomasgrou p.com
f il m
1of3
?200 I 882 I
{fil
rn
aqita lia,co m
www,filmagitalia.cg
Sales ltaly, Europe, Asia: Federico Fontana
M.E.G.A. S.p.A.
Via Pasin L
36010 Seghe diVelo d'Astico
Vicenza - ltalia
+39 0445 7391.L1
W\U$r;,n0
lnfAEfg"JI
www.foc.it
FOMAS
via Treviglio,44
Ita ly
lnfo@cioceaspa,,lt
htt p //-www.c occa s pa it/e n/
info@foreiad i bollate.com
www.forsipdibollate.cgm
Officine SANTAFEDE
Forgiatura A. Vienna diAntonio Vienna
Via Ospiate, 46/48
Via Fregera, 1
238L9 Cortabbio di Primaluna (LC), ltaly
+39 034L 979 919
sales@forgevienna,it
VALVITALIA S.p.A.
Via Tortona, 69
27055 Rivanazzano (PV) ltaly
Phone: +39 0383 945911
Fax: +39 0383 9459962
E-mail : info@valvitalia.co!n
Phone: +390309750211
www.fra nchiniacciai.it
www.valvitalia.com
Vyww.fgrqevi.ennq.it
htlp 11wtvw"s
foreine,php
:
pe rt
i,
corn lE /Ra l oe
rti-
2of3
72001882t
Assotherm srl
Registered office and logistcs
Via Broli, L2
24060 Casazza (BG)- ltaly
vAT 033739401.66
Tel. +39 035/813182
Faxl +39 035/816892
Fax2 +39 035/4501280
lnfotassotherinicom
lnox LaghiS.r.l.
Via Molinello
52 - 2!048 Solbiate Arno {VA) ltaly
Tel. +39 0331.76,00,11.
Fax +39 0331".98,57.00
KIASMA SRI.
rtinacrttit
kia s ma sil,
3of3
7200 I 882 I
r-9
2014
2013
2015
2016
60,824,063
55,162,447
66,314,804
19,579,163
9,676,875
Spain
9,765,907
6,887.98!
11,370,308
2,764,887
2,099,214
Italy
9,484,108
10,276,670
13,859,730
3,584,484
3,429,473
80,074,078
72,327,106
24,467,727
25,928,534
5,266,553
15,205,562
Total
23,896,801
'103,970,879
91,544,842
21,281,963
12,826,805
31,1S5,087
19,012,025
lndia
134,093,946
121,612,341 146,198,943
43,164,614
21,333,832
4.627,969
lndia
Subtotal
Other
96,794,83
85,3981
6,095,525
25,067 ,2Q8
3,806,463
Spain
21,530,114
15,'r
Italy
20,908,854
22,656,1521 30,555;43S
7s02,425
7,560,685
176,532,91t
159,453,7841 201,821,590
57,12,565
33,522,486
Subtotal
Other
52,683,365
Total
229.216.279
53,942,0401 46,918,641
21
11,610,748
8,391 ,804
8,773,313
41,914,29',1
lndia
101 ,269,507
82,628.133
96,602,7401, 30,423,768
Spain
25,174,792
Italy
28,221,531
21,034,623
29,772,513
27,550,9551
34,671,e381
Subtotal
Other
158,665,830
133,435,269
12,111,014
6,733,877
4,360,077
e,355,558
7,473,124
23,944,215
9,942,405
158,825,6331 46,513,203
60,676,0391 17,007,314
219.501,6721 63,520,517
77,O44,145
79.030.442,
Total
235,709,975
212,465,711
lndia
95,750,800
76.845,66,
89,133,999
28,140,483
Spain
27,200,462
19,539,513
25,607,347
6,273,336
Italy
25,022,927
26,761,809
3'1,042,060
147,974,189
123,146,986
71,063,907
194,210,893
33,886,62C
Subtotal
Other
69,352,610
Total
217,326,799
145,783,406
8,371,246
42,785,065
11.257
j32
4,028,971
6,659,656
21,945,759
54,002,676
15,301,25e
8,845,800
199,786,082
58,086,324
30,79'1,559
ctF g/tb.
lndia
0.755
0.679
0.661
0.705
Spain
1.355
1.385
1.099
1.105
0.s42
Italy
1.350
1.314
.135
1,184
O.9BB
0.899
0.837
0.787
0.814
0.714
1.462
1.028
1.465
1.293
1.465
0-996
O.BB2
0.924
0.808
0.652
1.029
0.871
Other
Total
0.568
.'l 85
0.714
Spain
Italy
1.263
Subtotal
Other
Total
0.632
0.6'10
1.287
LO22
0.528
1.',197
1.181
1.016
1.05S
O.BB1
O.B3B
0.772
0.722
0.748
0.655
1.316
1.317
1.'t51
1.318
1,054
0.948
0.91 0
0.803
0.845
0.735
Source: USITC DataWeb. lmports for HTS ltems 7307.91 .5010 and 7307.91.5050
r-10
ALLIED FITTING, LP
6040 LAGRANGE BLVD
ATLANTA, GA 30336
alliedfi ttings@alliedfi ttings.oom
+t
purchasing@amerpipe.com
lr.rlmed larges inrporrer natnes highlighecl in ltold. Counsel for Petitioners ttnclerlooli ther besl elTorts
'
to olttttin contact infurnrutionfor each tos:;ible importer of the subject nerchanclise. lnde<:cl, over seven Mayer
Brou,n stctl in three d(ferent offces spent nrtt?1ct'ous hout's collectivclt to obtuit email utllrcs.ses/or the identi/ed
possible inttorters. I4/here entuil oddrcs.sc, could simpl, no bc olttuinecl, we trovitle phone nttmbers.
720_5034 8
AMERIFORGE GROUP
l3TTO INDUSTRIAL RD
HOUSTON, TX 77015
info@afgl
ob al
corp. com
API INTERNATIONAL
6219W STONERDR
GREENIIIELD,IN 46140
info@apiint.com
ARCELORMITTAL AMERICA
1 S DEARBORN
CHICAGO, IL 60603
ami -ameri ca@arcelormittal. com
BALDAUF ENTERPRISES
910 HARRY S TRUMAN PKWY
BAY CITY, MI48706
laurahorney@kerkau.com
BIRMINGHAM, MI 48009
+t
gbawden@bwausa.com
I]BT1'Z USA
BECHTEL INTERNATIONAL
3OOO POST OAK BLVD
IOUS'|ON, ]-X11056
b ec
lt
et
nllegasp@bechtel.com
BERENFIELD CONTAINEIS
4555 LAKE FOREST DR
BLUE ASH, OH 45242
jharrel I@berenfleId.com
2
720503411
mediacontact@borgwarner. com
BPS HOUSTON
I4514 LUTFIE RD
HOUSTON, 'l',X71039
dhance@bakersfreldpipe. com
bsrnith@bakersfi eiclpipe.com
rvasquez@bakersfield. com
tberrson@bakersfi ed lpipe.com
ELKHORN,
WI
53121
CONSARC
INDEL AVE
RANCOCAS, NJ 08073
lOO
om
sales@consarceng.com
sa I es (r.!c orr sa rc. c
CONTECH INTERNA'TIONAI1046
ANNUNCIATION ST
DI- F-ANGI1
.]185
ohnson@dllan ge.com
3
72050:i48
DNOW I- P
7402 N ELDRIDGE PKV/Y
HOUSTON, TX
ap@dnow.com
LA PORTE, TX7757I
ap@dnow.com
DODSON GLOBAL
175 SOUTHBELT INDUSTRIAL DR
FIOUS'I'ON,TX71O41
sales@dodsonglobal.com
DYNAMIC INDUSTRIES
6005 PORT RD
DYNO NOBEL
660 HOPMEADOW ST
SIMSBURY, CT 06070
boisbriand.reception@am. dynonobel.com
francois. lambert(@arn. clynonobel.com
DWYEI{ INDUSTRII]S
600 N SHEPHERD DR STE 420
FIOUSTON,'[X77001
sdwyer(@dwyerin dustri
e s. c
onr
skoch@dwyerindustries.com
kpatterson@dwyerindustries. com
IIDGEN MURRAY
83OO BREEN DR
FtousToN,'t'x
11064
j oe.hammonds(@edgenmurray. com
4
7205014t
EP CLEVELAND
1621IIUR PKWY
VALLEY VIEW, OI144125
hBp ;i/pp I eveland..Cq m
f1 866 8623816
FAIRCHILD INDUSTRIES
475 CAPITAL DR
FERGUSON ENTERPRISES
FILTER TECFIS
FAIRGROLINDS DR
MANLIUS, NY I3IO4
info@filtertech,com
FLEXSTEEL CONNECTIONS
12450 CUl"r'EN ROAD
HOUSTON, TX 77066
+t
832
53i
8555
TERNES DR
MONROE, MI48162
sales@fedco-usa.com
IOI{GED COMPONENI'S
14527 SMITH RD
HUMtsI,E, 'TX1'/396
ahrabowiecky@forgedcomponeltts. com
IlotJSl'ON,
+t
'I',X 11078
5
72050348
GALPER'I'I
I60 SOUTFIBELT INDUSTRIAL DR
I.IOUSTON,TXl7O47
galprnail@galperti-am. com
+t
s.
com
INDIMET
50 MAIN ST STE 1260
V/TIITE PLAINS, NY 10606
info@indimet.com
IXONIA, WI53036
i
nfo@industrialvaccum, com
INDUSTRIAI, VALCO
635 GELLHORN DR
HOUS'TON,TX ]1029
webrnaster@industria lvalco.conl
6
720-50348
co.
corlr
joehader@kerkau.com
I
aurabaldauf@kerkau. com
HIDAI-GO, TX 78557
fredri k.tan geraas@ka-group. com
er
r-rQUrD coNTROr.S
105 ALBRECHT DR
excorp. com
1
7205014t
LOBLAW COMPANIES
2755 1g0r'r ST
SUITIIEY T]C V353W6 CANADA
investor@loblaw.ca
LYNVO FLANGI]
5114 STEADMONTH DR
HOUSTON,TXTTO4O
sales@lyncoflange,com
MACLEAN POWER
78OI PARK PLACE ROAD
PO BOX 949
YORK, SC 29745
+1 803 276 4462 ext. 15
lblackmon@macleanpower. com
atoby@)mac l eanpower.
otl
MATCO-NORCA
t944P.OUTE22
PO BOX 27
BREWSTER, NEW YORK 10509
partsandservice@matco-norca. com
bill.dobbins@mrcglobal.com
KRESS ST
HOUSTON, TX']1020
rsetzekorn@merfi sh.com
gmerfish@merlish.com
MlrIlT Ill{ASS
ONE MERIT DRIVE
CLEVELAND, OH 4414I
ie(!fi nepvfsa es. c on-l
arn
l
72050341( I
BIRMINGHAM, AL 35209
mbsal esal@meritbrass. com
MIDLAND MANUFACTUI{ING
7733 GROSS POINT RD
SKOKIE, IT,6A1
seosrni th @mi dlan dmfg.
co
ACKEI{MAN, MS 39735
info@mspforge.com
MITSUI
2OO I] RANDOLPH ST, STE 5210
CHICAGO, IL 6060I
+t 2t2 878 4000
a.blum@rnitsui.com
k.bateman@mitsui.com
t.golub@mitsui,com
ORASCOMI]&CUSA
3546 tgO'r'STREET
V/EVER,IA 52658
contactus@orascom. corn
PART;AB INDUSTRIES
r56r5 E 590 RD
INOLA, OK74036
contactus@orascom.0oul
9
72050348
PERIORMANCE CONCEP'TS
16898 PARADISE LANE, SUITE 9
SCOTTSDALE, AZ 85260
amoore@prfabfs.com
PM INTERNATIONAL SUPPLIERS
4305 HIGHLAND PARK BLVD
LAKELAND, FL 33813
info@pmfirst.com
POTS WEI.,DING
I9O1 OGLETOWN RD
NEWARK, DE 19711
dmccoy@pottswelding. com
tbuni s@pottswel ding.com
com
PRO FLANGES
I3O VONDRAU DR
114W I3TI.I ST
DEER PARK, TX'1'1536
sales@qtrinc.biz.
R AND S OILFIELD
14202 PARABLE LN
CYPRESS, T){17429
sales@rsoilfield,com.
R I] FI'I''I'TNGS AND I,LANGES
65IO MADRID ST
HOUSTON,TX7lj2l
sales@rbfittings.com.
RED V/OI,}.COMPANY
I826 BOONE TRAIL RD
SANFORD, NC 27330
i
rrfo(@redwol fl I c. com.
10
72050348
LIBERTY,5C29657
i
nvestor@regalbeloit. com.
SERVICE METALS
N KINGSHIGHV/AY BLVD
SAINT LOUIS, MO 63115
4OO1
+l
+l
j
braden@servicemetalcompany. com
SHREVEPORT, LA 7T101
app,sales@shawgrp.com
SILVO INDUSTRIES
50 CIIESTNUT RIDGE RD
MONTVALE, NJ 07645
+1 2At 307 0900
info@silboind.com
SOUTHWEST STAINLESS
D BA SFIALE INLAND PVF
4355 DRANE FIET,D RD
LAKELAND,IL 338I1
+1 863 646 1493
scott.batten@shaleinland.com
INTERNATIONAI, INC.
PAIK DIIVE
HOUS'I'ON, 1'X11041
STA'I. S
10950 BR]TTMOORE
usa@statsgrtlup.com
l1
?2050348
TA CI.IEN INTERNATIONAI,
9525 WALLISVILLE RD
WALLISVNLE, TX 17413
jeny
leneck@tachen.com
TEAM ALLOYS
7350 ROUND}IOUSE LANE
HOUSTON, TXl7O'18
bill.bootz@teamalloys.com
WAVERLY,TA 50677
inf'o@terex.com
TRIANGLE MEI'ALS
17845 S HWY 75
GLENPOOL, AK14A33
brobbins@trianglemetal susa.com
whi I l@turner-industries.com
12
720.5014
f I
83OO
HO{JSTON,
TX
+34 943't8 05
17070
522
US METALS
19102 GUNDLE RD
HOUSTON, TX77073
sales@usmetals.com
VAL II'I'
I57B LITTON DR
STONE MTN, GA
3OOB3
salesatl@valft.com
VALVTECHNOLOGIES
6600 DI]IHL RD
IIOUS'|ON, 'I-X17092
info@valv,com
VAN LEEUWEN MRO AND SERVICES
9OO SBUSINTJSS PARK DR
POIT AIITI_IUR,'TX 77 640
usa@vanleeuwen.com
VIRAJ USA
I 00 QUENTTN ROOSEVELI' BI-VD
GARDEN CITY, NY 1 I53O
wwuerthner@hvcbiz.rr. com
WELDFIT ENRRCY
4]33 SOUI'IIEIILANI)
HOUSTON, TXTA92
email@weldfit.com
-fexas
Secretary of State records, Bloonrberg,
cked Accurint public records, l-exis for
OneSource company database, Dun & Braclstreet and even called Houston irf'ornration. No cnrail or U.S. phone
numbel for this conlpany could be localed.
'
Moyer Brorvn
che
13
72050i48
WILO CANADA
9550 WIIIGGINS RD, STE 3OO
ROSEMONT, IL 60018
info@wilo-canada.com
14
7?0-5014 ri
r-11
PETITTONruRS' MARKET
SHARE DATA
2013
20161
2013
2oL4l 2o15l
Jan.-Mar.
z0t6
2Ot5
lmports:
134,094
lnd ia
Subtotal
AllOther
11,611
8,392
25,067
6,096
30,555
7,902
176,533
!59,454
52,683
Consumption
57,=163
15,185
22,656
Total lmports
U.S. Apparent
zot,822 :
21,334
4,629
7,561
33,522
43,165
L46,L99
20,909
Spain
Ita ly
727,672
53,942
213,396
46,9L9
68,772
4L,9t4
0,66
0.70
0.57
0.94
0.77
248,740
tot,27(
29,775
28,222
L58'6''.'
77,O44
L33,4g5li . .158,8261
235,71(
60,6761 t7,Oo7l'
7,473
23,944
9,942
33,887
lndia
Spain
Ita ly
I
Subtotal t
AllOther
Total lmports I
lmports:
0.76
lndia
Spain
Italy
Subtotal
AllOther
Total lmports
0.68
1.36
1.35
1.39
1.31
1.10
1.13
1.10
1.18
0.90
o.84
o.79
0.81
r.46
1.47
1.29
0.88
1_.46
1.18
0.92
0.81
1.03
1.00
0.99
Source: U.S. producers: Boltex and Weldbend and Bureau of Census import statistics from USITC dataweb.
PUBLIC VERSION
P'ffiffTTTONERS' TRADE
DATA
FORMATION
T-E-li
Jan.-Mar.
2ot4l'
2015
2016
2Ol
2AL4
2015
2o1sl
2Ot6
PUBLIC VERSION
FETTTIONERS'
FTI{AI{CIAL DATA
2,li,
zAtA
2015 ,
Jan.-Mar
2015
2016
7,000|bs.
Net Sales (volume)
Net Sales (value)
Cost of Goods Sold:
Raw Materials
ti
Direct Labor
Selling Expenses
G&A Expenses
Ii
l
I
TotalSG&A
Operating Profit
Other Expenses
Other lncome
Net lncome
Depreciation/Amortization
I
J
I
ratio
Colculotions
COGs/Sales
t
I
PUBLIC VERSION
I,-I2
WELDBEI{I)
FL.{AT I9N
p ;nM ES J.
Q,U!,AS;
J8'.9',*FI,DEND CORPORATI oN
I, James J. Coulas, Jr, owner and president of Weldbend Corporation (a Petitoner in this
action), hereby certiff and affirm as follows:
Whereas,
1,"
2.
I have been with Weldbend since 1967, and as such, have over 49 years of
experience in the carbon steel flanges business; and
Since the year 1980, I have been involved in selling carbon steel flanges produced
by Weldbend to ou U.S. customers, and thus am intimately familiar with the U.S.
marketplace for carbon steel flanges.
4.
5.
Over the last three years or so, our sales ofcabon steel flanges have been under
increasing volume and pricing pressure from imported product - in great part
from India, Spain and/or ltaly, who ae the Iargest sources of imports of this
product based on Census data. Flowever, customers rarely divulge to us the
specific source from whom they purchased when we lose sales volume.
Indeed, it is my belief that V/eldbend is increasingly losing sales to unfairlypriced imported carbon steel flanges - based on price, and price alone. In
addition, Weldbend has had to reduce is prices to retain sales as competition from
these imports has increased.
on April 14,2016,we were contacted
By way of
ll
I declare that all statements made above are true and correct.
72065517.
PUBLIC VERSION
BOLTEX
I, Frank Bernobich, of Boltex Mfg, Co., L.P. ("Boltex") (a Petitioner in this action), hereby
certify and affirm as follows:
'Whereas,
1.
2.
As
4
5
Over the last three years or so, our sales offinished carbon steel flanges have been under
increasing volume and pricing pressure from imported product - in great part frorr India,
Spain and/or Italy, who are the largest soulces of imports of this product based on Census
data. However, customers rarely divulge to us the specific source from whom they
purchased when we lose sales volume.
Indeed, it is my belief that Boltex is increasingly losing sales to unfairly-priced imported
carbon steel flanges - based on price, and price alone.
In great part due to pricing pressure from impofed flnished carbon steel flanges from
India, Spain and ltaly, Boltex has had to offer price reductions on its finished carbon steel
flanges. In the carbon steel flanges industry, this is generally done through applying a
A.
8,y'way pf'gxrnple as,of Jauary 3I,2076, in an slTrt to try and stay - --.
oompetitve against s'bject'itrnpos, Boltex was ofrihg a multiplier of(
J
For example'
Hovr'ever, because subject imports continued their increased presence in the U.S
market with even lower prices, on February'2,2016, Boltex generally had to
redrce its pricc an additional25o/o (which was done by applying a multiplier of
For example:
72N55362.3
PUBLIC VERSION
t pricesJmulttplier from the list price. We may even have to further reduce
beyond this.
I recently spoke by phone with three of our largest customers about boltex's
finishcd carbon steel flange prices vis-a-vis those from India, Spain and ltaly. To
6.
A.
B,
C.
I declare that all statements made above are true and conect.
-1. ?-o /l
Date
Bernobich
President
Attachment
(l)
720655362.2
PUBLIC VERSION
t
I
A,-TTAC'HIVTEI\T
t
l
I
i
I
ir
i
I
I
'
Lsnnu Nefi
I
F;iltil
sltriry
[t:r**
i
I
I
t,
r
!,
t,
t
I
T:
lI
I
I
I
f
I
I
1,.
I
I
t
t.
i
I
T
t
.
PUBLIC VERSION
.goqh,4 infoF.na$on-ptease identiff the individual that Commission stafi may contact regarding the Lost Sales
and Lost Revenue allegations.
Nerne
Jr
Tlle
Firm
Er,nail
Telephone
PUBUC VERSION
.-n
E
g
o
o-
Note
Note
Note
fet,
tethod(s) Of Sale
Tmng
unt
TyPe
both lost
lndia/ltaly/Spain
ndie/lly/Span
Flges
Flanges
lndia/ltaly/Spain
POt
POt
Flanges
lnda/ltaly/Spen
Flanges
lndialltialy/Spain
Flanges
lndia/ltaly/Spain
lbs
lbs
POr
lbs
POr
1-
bid
lb's
Note
Note
Sutect
Flenqes
anges
POI
revenues
and lost
Product
lbs
lbs
both
General descsription of
product(s) nvolved
lbs
lbs
Note
Note
POI
POt
POt
slelRFQ bid
bttl
sale/RFQ bid
lndvdual sale/RFQ bid
POr
lbs
Note
lbs
POr
Flanges
lndia/ltaly/Spain
Note
lbs
POI
lndividual sle/RFQ bd
Flanges
lndi/ltlv/Soan
Note
lbs
POr
Flanges
lnda/ltialy/Spain
lbs
POr
Flanges
lndia/ltaty/Spain
lbs
POt
sale/RFQ brd
lbs
POt
lbs
Note
Note
Nofe
lbs
POt
POt
lndvidual sale/RFQ bd
lndvidual sele/RFQ bd
Flenges
iHote t
lbs
POI
Flanqes
revenues
lndia/ltalylSpain
General desriplion of
product(s) nvolved
Product Type(s)
Subiec{ Country(ies)
lndia/ltaly/Spain
Note
lbs
POt
Flanges
lndiaf taly/Span
Note
lbs
POt
lndividual sale/RFO bd
Flanges
lndia/ltaly/Spain
Note
l,o"
Por
Flnges
lndia/ltaly/Spain
Note
lbs
POt
Flanqes
lndia/ltaly/Spain
Nt
Flanges
lndiatlY/SDin
Note
lndividual sale/RFQ bd
Flanqes
lndiantaly/Spain
'-'
lbs
POr
Flanges
lnda/ltelv/Soan
Flanqes
lndia/ltaly/Spain
Note
lbs
POt
Note
lbs
POr
sale/RFQ bid
Note l
lbs
POt
lndividual sale/RFQ bd
Flanges
lndiantalv/Soain
Note
Note
POr
POt
Flanges
Flanqes
lndialltaly/Spain
lbs
lbs
Note
lbs
POt
lndlvrdual sale/RFQ bd
Flanqes
lndialltaly/Spn
Note
lbs
POt
Flanqes
lndia/ltaly/Spain
dh
Note
lbs
POt
Note
Note
Note
lbs
Por
lbs
lbs
lbs
lbs
lbs
bs
POr
POt
lndividual sle/RFQ
lndividual sale/RFQ
lndvidual sale/RFQ
lndvdual sale/RFQ
bid
bid
bid
Flanqes
Flanges
Flanges
Flanqes
POI
POt
lndividual sale/RFQ bd
lndividual sle/RFQ bd
lndvdual sale/RFO bd
Flanqes
Flanges
Flanges
revenues
revenues
Note't
relenues
Note'l
Note l
revenues
Note
bd
lndialtaly/Spin
lndia/ltalY/Soain
ndia/ltalyrsoain
Gontact information.-please identif, the ndMdualthat Commission staffmay contact garding the Lost Sales
and Lost Revenue allegations.
Name
Tifle
Frm
Eml
Telephone
Ldn{nGCrton&d
pom|intcF!@
ft moettrif
PFd
salsrloaa
l3t
wllh
lr
rra
loct
safta{ffi
A.
@ca<laoftfrprcflg
coda
Blb:( iiCo.. LP
PUB['C YER$ON
Gl dMiplto dmod
Gnl lim Pcriod (Y6rs
lod
of slo (o.9.. indivrrC sle,
Unit fd ttro Epodd q6w cl nd/d mf,3) in hlc sls
rda5od
rafr oS alrd 9ri re ntad neesttm4 RFQ bid, Gomrdsriptsol
!P olrtl, so niD pr$ Agqrgquadnyofanybl lod sls (c.g. sho b,
produc{s) nnld
lnt6md sal6s, rtcl
rdu6d
fad. ponds. stc.)
selos lgslixs
6rdftifru)
!d: d'o
rtfirf.
lo{n
lol
2011.
RF.9 Bids
L8
2014.2015
'ld
16lodat
Produ
S.b
Unlt
AleodlmTyp.
County(s) of qigin d
npdino impord
ITALT ,.
its sales
eadr
ofrse
haE
dedhed os l
Eoltex b certah ttat
dedne h pllrdtass
thes key
iporl
Fomtt sb.:ct
is die 1o
and ws Boltx
prices d to
redEd
PUBLIC VERSION
I-13
Port
Spain
tal
5,509
lndia
Italv
5,509
337,225
337,225
428,4r5
390
428,B05
32,I04
32,1.04
4,43r,081
4,431.,O81.
1,629,667
198
5,898,659
L6,396,533
4,180
1,628,866
5,go2,g3g
28,7:99
490,892
16,91.5,723
629,LO6
629,1,06
101,902
101,902
25,243
18,I82
14,834
27,240,697
373,090
5,620,518
t34,912,236
Laredo, TX
347,847
5,59L,503
73,226,958
1,526
8,579
Los Angeles, CA
Anchorage, AK
Baltimore, MD
Boston, MA
Buffalo, NY
Charleston, SC
Charlotte, NC
Chicago, lL
Clevela n
'
Clumbia-Snake, OR
Dallas-Fort Worth, TX
Detroit, Ml
Great Falls, MT
Houston-Galveston, TX
r.3,253,909
34,504,580
7,053
L,453,35g
1,300,331
L6,007,598
FL
507,007
9,764
t,1_42
5r7,91,4
Minneapolis, MN
New Orleans, LA
New York, NY
Norfolk, VA
Ogdensburg, NY
1,819
L,81"9
,284
73r;1,41"
2,81,4,625
9,479,672
4,013,286
182,556
9,662,228
4,0L3,290
Miami,
Pembina,.ND
125,335
0
Philadelphia, PA
San Juan, PR
Savannah, GA
Seattl, WA
44,350
258,031
136
338,603
85,760
20,824,792
San Francisco, CA
48,438..
0
0
440,948
594,884
7,96L
FL
Total
Ports Where all 3 Presen
3,544,526
335,290
767,532,775
!29,926,O37
2!,860,624
38,L16,t23
29,695,!78
36,713,L62
29t687,2t7
196,326,4L5
44,35O
'_ 431,803
363,136
338,603
85,760
3,926,966
3,552,487
335,290
235,344,076
3,g2O,O7O
St. Louis, MO
Iampa,
83.4%
r-14
2013
Pices
1Q
2Q
3Q
2014
1Q
I
t
I
t
t
t
t
2Q
3Q
I
t
4Q
1Q
2Q
3Q
2015
2016
4Q
40
1Q
Price
t
t
I
I
PUBLIC VERSION
r-15
Petitioners submit that, cornbinecl, they constitute well over 50% of total U.S, production of
finished carbon steel flanges (including in 2015). $es alss, Exhibit I-2. To demonstrate that
'
fact, at Exhibit I-15-4, we provide an affidavit ftom the president of Boltex, where he calculates
total 2015 U.S. flange forging production plus imports, Because all finished flanges come from
flange forgings, and because all flange forgings are used to make finished flanges, total U.S.
production plus total U.S. imports of flange forgings is a reasonable substitute for finished
carbon steel flanges, As detailed in that affidavit, total 2015 flange forgings produced, as well as
importecl, in the United States was
Exhibit I-15-4, Boltex's 2015 finishecl carbon steel flange production quantity was [
poun<ls. As set forth in the Weldbend affidavit at
] pouncls'
Therefore, using flange forgings production and imports as the denominator in calculating total
U.S. production, Weldbqnd and Boltex accounted fbr
steel flange production in 2015
([
As noted in Exhibt I-15-4, the total 2015 production of flange forgings figure of
were to use its estimatcd, theoretical production capacily, the 2015 flange forging number
increases to
([
])'
"t20871402
PUBLIC VERSION
72087 1402
500%
of total 2015
I-L5-A
.l
Boltex began as a flange rnachining opelation ih 1989, and started forging its own
line of flanges in 1996.
I have been with lloltex since its inception, ancl includillg my time at Boltex,I
have over 3,9 years of experieuce irl the carbon steel flanges business'
During my iaknost four decacles in the carbon stecl flangcs business, I have visitecl
the facilities of severai otlrer domesic producers of finished carbon steel flanges,
ancl have,visited foreign producels of the product in ltaly, India, Germany and
France.
4,
5
o.
,1
8.
r0.
The uumbcr of Il,S. companies proclucing finished carbon steel flanges is quitc
surall, and these companies ale well-known to those in the industry.
To my knowledge, there is no public information on U.S. production capacity or
output offinished carbon steel flanges.
l:fowever, in 201 5, Boltex produced
I pound of finishecl,
A finished flange first stas with a flange forgig, As such, all finished flanges
produced in the tjnited States start out as a flattge fbrging. Accordingly, the
number of flange forgings produced/imported into the {Jnited States in a given
year is a r:eliable and reasonable substitute lbr domestic fnished flange
procluction.
In the Unitecl States, there are only three meaningful sources of suppiy for flange
forgings consumed in the lJnited States: imported flange forgings (under HTSUS
7307 .91.10,00), flange forgings producecl by Boltex, and flange forgings
produccd'by a ompany called Ameri-Forge Corporatiotr ("Amer-lorge"), which
is locatd al13770Idustrial Rd, Flouston,TX77015, I am not aware of any
other clomestic producels of flange forgings that sell in any meaningful quanities,
In 201 5, Roltex produced
1 pounds of fanges forgings.
At Attaclrrnent A hereto are 2015 U.S. irnport stalistics for HTSUS
7307 .91,l0;00. 'l'he total kilograrns of flange forgings imported into the United
Statcs wus 16,47V,956 kilograms (which equals 36,316,652 pounds)' As such,
between Boltcx and irnports, the total pounds of flange forgings
prodr.ree<i/importecl into the United States in 2015 was
l. The missing
quantity is that from Amei-f olge.
An:eri-Forge does not publish its production, sales ol capacity data. I'lowever, it
is also located in Flouston, "l'exas (where Bollex is located), and their production
lacility is conliguous to that of 3oltex's production facility.
As his is:a ,smali industty, I am very familiar lVith Amcri-Forge, their operations,
ll.
12.
l3
72086091.t
PUBLIC VERSION
t4,
full operational production (20 hours a day/6 days a week), Considering the
current domestic nTarketplace in terms of impor-ted finished carbon steel fanges
and demand, I eslimate lhat, at most, Ameri-Forge could have produced
approximately I ;400,000 pounds of forgings in the United States in 20 I 5,
In short, my best and rnost reasonable calculation of the quantity of flange
,] pounds (Boltex's
forgings consumed n the United States in 2015 is
aclual procluctiorr + actual imports + estimated Anreri-Forge ctual production).
Because flange forgings can only be used to produce fnishcd flanges, I believe
that tcltal lU:.S. prociLrction of finished carbon steel flanges in 2015 was, at ntost,
15.
] pounds.
I declare that all statenents made above are true and corect.
la
3c -
Zo/
Date
7208l09r,r
PUBLC VERSION
ATTACHMEI{T A
7307911000: tirst Unit of Quantity BY Quantity Description AND BY Frst Unit of Quantity Annual Data
2015
country KG
Short Tons
Italy
gro77,L7g
9,903
China
4:r!g!,89L
4,621
Spain
L:,269,924
1.,400
lndia
Germany
t,1v2,388
7,292
763
Korea
'691,783
529,793
Canaba
199,753
2t9
Mexico
'tt4,2gg
126
Turkey
lsrael
Taiwan
54,720
56
, 47,359
584
52
4r,087
45
Japan
35,74L
39
Argentina
33,597
37
United Kin
Thailand
Malaysia
7,506
2,2L9
I
2
1,986
Czech Rept
1,965
Denmark
Unted Ara
1,813
854
Romania
France
s72
t
0
Belarus
Sweden
297
Netherla nd
108
59
s0
Uruguay
Austria
Poland
Total
26
L6,472,956
18,158
'I
r-1-5-B
DECLARATION
In
0r
l.
2.
3.
4,
I declare that all statements made above are true and correct.
Date
720812 L
las,
PUBLIC VERSION