Professional Documents
Culture Documents
2
THE
GREG
TATE
READER
GREG TATE
Flyboy 2
FLYBOY
2
The Greg Tate Reader
greg tate
4. Screenings
Spike Lee’s Bamboozled 265
It’s a Mack Thing 270
Sex and Negrocity: John Singleton’s Baby Boy 272
Lincoln in Whiteface: Jeffrey Wright and Don Cheadle
in Suzan-Lori Parks’s Topdog/Underdog 275
The Black Power Mixtape 278
5. Race, Sex, Politricks, and Belles Lettres
Clarence Major 285
The Atlantic Sound: Caryl Phillips’s The Atlantic Sound 288
Apocalypse Now: Patricia Hill Collins’s Black Sexual Politics;
Thomas Shevory’s Notorious H.I.V.; Jacob Levenson’s
The Secret Epidemic 290
Blood and Bridges 292
Nigger-’Tude 296
Triple Threat: Jerry Gafio Watts’s Amiri Baraka; Hazel Rowley’s
Richard Wright; David Macey’s Frantz Fanon 299
Bottom Feeders: Natsuo Kirino’s Out 306
Scaling the Heights: Maryse Condé’s Windward Heights 307
Fear of a Mongrel Planet: Zadie Smith’s White Teeth 310
Adventures in the Skin Trade: Lisa Teasley’s Glow in the Dark 313
Generations Hexed: Jeffery Renard Allen’s Rails under My Back 315
Going Underground: Gayl Jones’s Mosquito 317
Judgment Day: Toni Morrison’s Love and Edward P. Jones’s
The Known World 320
Black Modernity and Laughter, or How It Came to Be That
N*g*as Got Jokes 322
Kalahari Hopscotch, or Notes toward a Twenty-Volume
Afrocentric Futurist Manifesto 330
Sources 343
Index 347
Introduction
Lust, of All Things (Black)
“ There are only two subjects—race and sex—and we alternate between the
two.” We recall the filmmaker Sandye Wilson dropping this maxim on Lisa
Jones around 1986. Most likely after Lisa had made some self-deprecating
comment about the content, or supposed lack thereof, of one of her own
smart, racy, surreal plays about the politics of Black desire for her com-
pany Rodeo Caldonia High Performance Theatre. Wilson’s quip stuck with
me (and to me) because like every other growing American boy I had
long been equally obsessed with both of those vast, irreducible, and in-
exhaustible subjects. Race, generally equated with politics, is really in the
American context a branch of metaphysics, aesthetics, and anthropology
representing a far broader body of concerns where you can readily leap-
frog between sex, death, religion, criminality, linguistics, music, genetics,
athletics, fashion, medicine, you name it, in the name of African libera-
tion and self-determination. For a Black American artist at this stage
of history race is the gift that keeps on giving, an encyclopedic way of
framing, examining, and mirroring the world in ways that can aspire to be
as poetic, prophetic, polemical, and poignant as that metamorphic, meta-
phoric machine we know by that crafty and elusive catchall “Black Culture.”
Of course, what I myself have really been intrigued by all along is
something less quantifiable than Black Culture and even Black Identity
and Black Consciousness, and that something is what my friend Arthur
Jafa has termed Black Cognition—the way Black people “think,” men-
tally, emotionally, physically, cryptically how those ways of thinking and
being inform our artistic choices.
Stanley Crouch once told me he thought my real subject was Myth,
and to a certain extent that’s true, inasmuch as I think that the most
fabulous things about any people are the legends they produce. But as
true as that is, I’m interested in the play and whimsy, the process as it
were, which preceded the formal production of the myth. Black Rock
guitarist Ronny Drayton relates how when he was learning to play, older
cats told him when he studied someone’s solo to try and imagine that
player’s intentions—what had he been feeling to make him play a certain
way, what story was he trying to tell. James Baldwin was once asked if he
thought Black people were better than white people. Baldwin replied in
the negative but went on to say he did think Black people had a greater
capacity for experience, which I always took to mean we had the best sto-
ries and storytellers. (This is how we know Jesus was Black—he talked a
new religion into existence and it stuck.)
The arenas where Black people have had the most visible, visceral, and
profound impact on the modern world have been those in which we can
freely repurpose our experiences, our wagging tongues, our fun. Black
Cultures and Black Cognition tend to privilege the structuring and styl-
izing of the bloody improvisational moment. What’s proven remarkable
about the way Black people play with such self-invented forms is how
we inevitably devise these call-and-response languages that other folk,
worldwide, feel compelled to emulate.
As in physics, where the most esthetic equations are generally proven
to be the correct ones, the most beautiful and approximate abstractions
of the forces of nature, Black improvisational languages in music, dance,
poetry, art, and athletics owe their charisma to their elegance, their risk
taking, and to their invitational, democratic, come-one, come-all viral,
virile, vulnerable, vernacular engineering.
Because I had been intensely reading listening thinking arguing
about jazz, blues, and funk in this high-handed way since I was, oh, the
age of twelve, by the time I was twenty-three and began writing for the
Village Voice I was a sure case of precocious cogitation and preparation
meeting opportunity and maybe even destiny. I also knew like Crouch,
Baraka, and Ellison before me that Black music was a unique, insight-
ful mechanism for comprehending how people of African descent had
survived, transcended, transmuted, and transmogrified their horrible
American experience. What I knew that my critical elders didn’t by sheer
dint of generational accident, access, and affinity was that hip-hop mat-
tered from the get-go. That once again, the African American working
class, best described by my old landlord and mentor A. B. Spellman as
“the most despised and feared group of people on this earth,” had created
another vernacular, improvisational form for addressing their condition
and the condition of the world. Of course I also knew hip-hop mattered
because it replicated, revoiced, and extended rhythmic, sonic, and col-
lage effects Miles Davis, Ornette Coleman, Sun Ra, Jimi Hendrix, and
George Clinton had renovated in their very Afrocentrically Expression-
ist musics of the sixties and seventies. More to the point, I recognized
that if I wanted more of where that marvelously head-chargey kind of
funk came from, it was only going to come from hip-hop.
2 Introduction
Though born in 1957, I am not a child of the sixties but, like most who
define the hip-hop generation, a child of the seventies. What being a
child of the seventies meant for any young Black man trying to become a
writer middecade was coming to terms with Black feminism in literature,
visual art, and politics and the innate, emergent, and self-authorizing
power of Black women in general. This leg of the journey began at How-
ard University in the midseventies, where several annual writers’ con-
ferences made clear that the most provocative, innovative, and insis-
tent voices in African American novels, poetry, drama, and criticism in
the moment were named Audre Lorde, Adrienne Kennedy, Toni Mor-
rison, Jayne Cortez, Ai, Thulani Davis, Ntozake Shange, Gayl Jones,
Michelle Wallace, Barbara Smith, Alice Walker.
Being at Howard at the time also meant becoming aware—via film-
maker and professor Haile Gerima’s courses—of “3rd world cinema,”
which included an independent Black cinema movement led by Gerima’s
ucla classmates Charles Barnett, Larry Clarke, and Julie Dash, the work
of Ousmane Sembène, and the revolutionary cinema emerging from
Cuba, like Lucia, and Argentina’s The Hour of the Furnace.
Being at Howard then also meant encountering the Africentric ex-
pressionism of the Africobra school of painters, many of whom were
then teaching or lecturing at the school—Al Smith, Frank Smith, James
Phillips, Nelson Stevens, and the late department chair, Jeff Donaldson
(not to mention the phenomenal Ethiopian Skunder Boghossian).
Being the child of lifetime Pan-Afrikanist Florence Tate meant the
same woman who introduced me to the recordings of Aretha Franklin,
Malcolm X, and Nina Simone via heavy rotation in our home would also
“break” the music of Jimmy Cliff and Fela for us. Being the brother of
Brian Tate, one of Washington, DC’s first Black punks, meant the Clash,
Bad Brains, Talking Heads, the Sex Pistols, James White and the Blacks,
and Siouxsie and the Banshees became enveloped in my conception of
the funk. Becoming friends with Vernon Reid in 1979, three years before
I moved to New York, meant I actually knew someone who was inventing
a life for himself at the intersection of free jazz, punk rock, hip-hop, and
harmolodic funk. A combustive mixture of elements downtown Gotham
loudly proclaimed was going to be late twentieth-century art’s new lin-
gua franca. Becoming a friend of Linda Bryant—Tribeca’s only African
American gallerist and conceptual art curator—meant meeting David
Hammons, Senga Nengudi, Bill T. Jones, Adrian Piper, Houston Conwill,
Lorna Simpson, and Fred Wilson, moments after becoming aware of their
existence and sensibilities. What befriending Thulani Davis in the mid-
seventies meant was that when she told me to send Robert Christgau some
4 Introduction
culture and profession that now allows Nelson George, Barry Michael
Cooper, and myself to sit back and laugh at the fact that “hip-hop jour-
nalist,” a label once considered oxymoronic, is now something you can
proudly scribble as occupation on your tax return.
I feel like I was somewhat removed from much caring about the state
and fate of hip-hop by the time Tupac and Biggie began publicly feud-
ing, certainly by the time they were murdered, but this isn’t true—I still
care very deeply and know that’s just a wounded protectiveness talking.
Like a lot of folk, I also knew the party, the hip-hop movement, was
truly over when Puffy, a major talent scout but no talent, got the nerve
to get on the mic—and went platinum! This became the handwriting
on the wall if only because it signified that Black Mediocrity was now as
commercially viable in hip-hop as Black Genius, the same fate that had
already befallen jazz and soul in the eighties.
But hip-hop, like Black music always has been and always will be, is
the most accurate arbiter of the zeitgeist, of the consciousness of the
people and of the age. And insofar as this moment is defined by sex,
shopping, terror, and virtual life and death, hip-hop remains our most
prophetic cultural pulse taker, raker, and shaker. Bush, bin Laden, Fifty
Cent, Paris Hilton, Fox News, ringer tones, and the iPod shuffle—these
are actually what constitute our real world, people—a world of loops,
break beats, random bombings, bootleg videos, faked realness, and ma-
nipulated fears; it’s all of a piece, it all runs together nicely, don’t you
think, quite wickedly in fact, welcome to the twenty-first century, “not
what you hoped for is it?,” love it or leave it, sing along with me.
Premillennium tension and my hip-hop divorce aside, however, by the
midnineties I was trying to make a little music of my own. Threw my-
self wholeheartedly, really, into Black rock improv bands with oblique
feminist names like Women in Love, Mack Diva, Strange but Beautiful,
Medusa Oblongata, and, since 1999, Burnt Sugar, the Arkestra Cham-
ber. The latter of which more than anything is about me trying to make
the genre-bending Black music I’d like to hear but cannot find. I got so
much joy out of it that I found myself thinking in moments of ecstasy
and delirium that I’d rather be a mediocre musician than a great writer.
It’s not true, but I relate to the sentiment simply because like anyone
with a heart, I love the social part of music far more than the social part
of writing, which is, need it be said, nil. The real drawback, though, for
a critic composing and performing music as a coprofession is that your
edge and killer instinct go kaput. Another occupational hazard of a pro-
fession as narcissistic as playing live music is that you can become less
concerned with what everybody else is doing. So though I continued to
6 Introduction