Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Are The $544m in Legal Fees at Risk in The Mastercard Visa Antitrust Cases

    Uploaded by

    SenateBriberyInquiry
    9 views2 pages
    According to the findings of the Inst. of Public Accountants, Trevor McTaggart unprofessionally threatened to use goons on people. His friends Michael McGarvie, Howard Bowles and Clair Marshall at the State Government Board of Ethics, were very helpful to him, but the SEC Protected Disclosers went to the SEC. The RBA data was confirmed as misrepresented by Amex for 10 years. The Shaeholders sued Amex' Board in Lankford v Chenault & Ors, and the Amex Settlement was tossed because of the unethical collusion by goon cocaine traffickers who ran a sham lit support firm like Mctaggart does. Next the Confessions by Friedman and Ravelo confirmed the collusion, and Judges Winter Jacobs and Leval nixed the MC/Visa Settlement on ethics grounds, just as the SEC Protected Disclosers warned might happen. But who pays the $544 in costs that might be reduced or nixed? After all, the VLSB chose to disagree with BankReformNow, Submissions at Parliament, Witness, Extraterritorial anti-tampering laws, extraterritorial Wire Laws, RICO laws, Foreign Corrupt Practices Act Laws, the Economic Espionage Act 1996 and the landlord. The landlord warned the VLSB they were aiding imposters who invent pretenses to obtain information about possible witnesses in witness programs for dubious characters, and Dr B advised the SEC that the VLSB acted maliciously to cover up their liability to all the persons affected by the VLSB's aiding these characters. "“After losing my cases over and over, LSBC Insiders whispered to go to VCAT, the FBI and the US SEC. That was how deeply troubled the Legal Services Board and Commission people were. Who would think to call the FBI!? I thought they were insane. I did anyway. I am registered with a group at the SEC and the SEC might pay a reward if the Banks are fined. They spoke to other people about my case even though the LSBC is liable for damages if they blow the whistle or talk to the wrong people. (I estimate that I am entitled to over $3mill.)” “Soon afterwards, Channel 7 News said a tip off last year caused audits and arrests of bank executives. (I think the tip off was from the LSBC whistleblowers to the SEC Witnesses). The FBI wanted the Hush Deed. Inquiries were made by - Auditors from Ace Foundation - Auditors from Computer Science Corporation - An MP about an accountant in Brighton, - Bank Reform people in NSW - 60 Minutes’ producer for the ANZ Story that was aired in August this year - Fairfax and ABC - The FBI “IC” Division. - The SEC Office of the Director of Corporate Compliance - The SEC’s Senior Counsel Mr McCreedy - IBAC anti-corruption commission - Victorian Ombudsman - Parliamentarians who want the names of Legal Services Board officials - about the American Express Case. They lost billions because of the Reserve Bank of Australia “The LSBC told me to go away despite damning evidence and despite the FBI arresting people. You would think the LSBC might see a few ethics issues if banks executives are arrested over the same Hush Deed they said was legal and ethical". Australian Independent MPs aren't impressed the VLSB "spied" on them in elections as they pushed for a Royal Commission into cover ups. Is the VLSB liable for the costs?

    Original Title

    Are the $544m in legal fees at risk in the Mastercard Visa Antitrust Cases

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Available Formats

    PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    According to the findings of the Inst. of Public Accountants, Trevor McTaggart unprofessionally threatened to use goons on people. His friends Michael McGarvie, Howard Bowles and Clair Marshall at the State Government Board of Ethics, were very helpful to him, but the SEC Protected Disclosers went to the SEC. The RBA data was confirmed as misrepresented by Amex for 10 years. The Shaeholders sued Amex' Board in Lankford v Chenault & Ors, and the Amex Settlement was tossed because of the unethical collusion by goon cocaine traffickers who ran a sham lit support firm like Mctaggart does. Next the Confessions by Friedman and Ravelo confirmed the collusion, and Judges Winter Jacobs and Leval nixed the MC/Visa Settlement on ethics grounds, just as the SEC Protected Disclosers warned might happen. But who pays the $544 in costs that might be reduced or nixed? After all, the VLSB chose to disagree with BankReformNow, Submissions at Parliament, Witness, Extraterritorial anti-tampering laws, extraterritorial Wire Laws, RICO laws, Foreign Corrupt Practices Act Laws, the Economic Espionage Act 1996 and the landlord. The landlord warned the VLSB they were aiding imposters who invent pretenses to obtain information about possible witnesses in witness programs for dubious characters, and Dr B advised the SEC that the VLSB acted maliciously to cover up their liability to all the persons affected by the VLSB's aiding these characters. "“After losing my cases over and over, LSBC Insiders whispered to go to VCAT, the FBI and the US SEC. That was how deeply troubled the Legal Services Board and Commission people were. Who would think to call the FBI!? I thought they were insane. I did anyway. I am registered with a group at the SEC and the SEC might pay a reward if the Banks are fined. They spoke to other people about my case even though the LSBC is liable for damages if they blow the whistle or talk to the wrong people. (I estimate that I am entitled to over $3mill.)” “Soon afterwards, Channel 7 News said a tip off last year caused audits and arrests of bank executives. (I think the tip off was from the LSBC whistleblowers to the SEC Witnesses). The FBI wanted the Hush Deed. Inquiries were made by - Auditors from Ace Foundation - Auditors from Computer Science Corporation - An MP about an accountant in Brighton, - Bank Reform people in NSW - 60 Minutes’ producer for the ANZ Story that was aired in August this year - Fairfax and ABC - The FBI “IC” Division. - The SEC Office of the Director of Corporate Compliance - The SEC’s Senior Counsel Mr McCreedy - IBAC anti-corruption commission - Victorian Ombudsman - Parliamentarians who want the names of Legal Services Board officials - about the American Express Case. They lost billions because of the Reserve Bank of Australia “The LSBC told me to go away despite damning evidence and despite the FBI arresting people. You would think the LSBC might see a few ethics issues if banks executives are arrested over the same Hush Deed they said was legal and ethical". Australian Independent MPs aren't impressed the VLSB "spied" on them in elections as they pushed for a Royal Commission into cover ups. Is the VLSB liable for the costs?

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    9 views2 pages

    Are The $544m in Legal Fees at Risk in The Mastercard Visa Antitrust Cases

    Uploaded by

    SenateBriberyInquiry
    According to the findings of the Inst. of Public Accountants, Trevor McTaggart unprofessionally threatened to use goons on people. His friends Michael McGarvie, Howard Bowles and Clair Marshall at the State Government Board of Ethics, were very helpful to him, but the SEC Protected Disclosers went to the SEC. The RBA data was confirmed as misrepresented by Amex for 10 years. The Shaeholders sued Amex' Board in Lankford v Chenault & Ors, and the Amex Settlement was tossed because of the unethical collusion by goon cocaine traffickers who ran a sham lit support firm like Mctaggart does. Next the Confessions by Friedman and Ravelo confirmed the collusion, and Judges Winter Jacobs and Leval nixed the MC/Visa Settlement on ethics grounds, just as the SEC Protected Disclosers warned might happen. But who pays the $544 in costs that might be reduced or nixed? After all, the VLSB chose to disagree with BankReformNow, Submissions at Parliament, Witness, Extraterritorial anti-tampering laws, extraterritorial Wire Laws, RICO laws, Foreign Corrupt Practices Act Laws, the Economic Espionage Act 1996 and the landlord. The landlord warned the VLSB they were aiding imposters who invent pretenses to obtain information about possible witnesses in witness programs for dubious characters, and Dr B advised the SEC that the VLSB acted maliciously to cover up their liability to all the persons affected by the VLSB's aiding these characters. "“After losing my cases over and over, LSBC Insiders whispered to go to VCAT, the FBI and the US SEC. That was how deeply troubled the Legal Services Board and Commission people were. Who would think to call the FBI!? I thought they were insane. I did anyway. I am registered with a group at the SEC and the SEC might pay a reward if the Banks are fined. They spoke to other people about my case even though the LSBC is liable for damages if they blow the whistle or talk to the wrong people. (I estimate that I am entitled to over $3mill.)” “Soon afterwards, Channel 7 News said a tip off last year caused audits and arrests of bank executives. (I think the tip off was from the LSBC whistleblowers to the SEC Witnesses). The FBI wanted the Hush Deed. Inquiries were made by - Auditors from Ace Foundation - Auditors from Computer Science Corporation - An MP about an accountant in Brighton, - Bank Reform people in NSW - 60 Minutes’ producer for the ANZ Story that was aired in August this year - Fairfax and ABC - The FBI “IC” Division. - The SEC Office of the Director of Corporate Compliance - The SEC’s Senior Counsel Mr McCreedy - IBAC anti-corruption commission - Victorian Ombudsman - Parliamentarians who want the names of Legal Services Board officials - about the American Express Case. They lost billions because of the Reserve Bank of Australia “The LSBC told me to go away despite damning evidence and despite the FBI arresting people. You would think the LSBC might see a few ethics issues if banks executives are arrested over the same Hush Deed they said was legal and ethical". Australian Independent MPs aren't impressed the VLSB "spied" on them in elections as they pushed for a Royal Commission into cover ups. Is the VLSB liable for the costs?

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 2

    Will $544m in legal fees be challenged like the fees written off

    in the related collusion case of Amex? Who was the Victorian


    Legal Services Board officials who told its customers to report
    Big Law Firms to the US SEC because the VLSB is tired of Big Law
    Firms getting off?

    You might also like