Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Part 2
Introduction
In the last edition of PESA News Resources (No
116), the use of chemostratigraphy to help refine
stratigraphic understanding of shale resource
plays was discussed. Following on from Part 1,
we will here look at what additional information
can be gathered about shale reservoirs from
the same elemental dataset that provides
chemostratigraphic correlations.
y=0.47x+2.97
R2=0.92
25
Na2O(%)
20
Al2O3 (%)
B
CaO (%)
1.5
R =0.89
2
R2=0.85
1.4
20
1.3
15
1.2
15
1.1
1.0
10
10
0.9
0.8
0.7
5
10
20
30
40
50
10
15
20
Illite (%)
30
35
Calcite (%)
0.6
10
12
Plagioclase (%)
E
TOC (%)
10
Fe2O3 (%)
25
R =0.90
2
3.5
3.0
2.5
2.0
6
1.5
1.0
0.5
2
10
15
20
Chlorite (%)
0.0
R2=0.88
y = 0.3325x + 0.3108
0
10
15
20
25
Mo (ppm)
Figure 1. 1A-D: Cross plots of selected elements and minerals, with regression coefficient (R2) displayed. Mineral data were acquired using XRD. 1E: Cross-plot of Mo
and TOC values, with R2 and regression line equation displayed.FIGURE
TOC values1obtained from LECO analysis. All ICP, XRD and LECO TOC analyses were carried out on a
subsample of homogenised powder.
April/May 2012 | PESA News Resources |
55
shale exploration
3 shows that within parts of the Haynesville
formation, EF far in excess of 1 are seen for Mo, U,
Ni and V, all elements that becomes authigenically
enriched in sediments deposited under anoxic
conditions. Figure 3 also demonstrates in that
EFs in Package 4 are all low, implying conditions
where oxic to suboxic during the deposition
of the Bossier formation, whereas EF values in
Package 2 are >1 implying anoxic conditions
during deposition of the Haynesville formation,
with notably high values recorded toward the
bottom of Package 2 (unit 2.1).
Depth (ft)
0
0
10900
Quartz XRD
Illite XRD
Calcite XRD
Chlorite XRD
80 0
Quartz Calc.
80 0
60 0
Illite_calc.
60 0
50 0
Calcite calc.
50 0
25 0
15 0
Chlorite calc.
Plagioclase calc.
25 0
15 0
Plagioclase XRD
Pyrite XRD
TOC
10 0
Pyrite calc.
10 0
TOC_calc.
-
5
5
10950
11000
11050
11100
11150
11200
11250
Mo >10ppm
11300
11350
Figure 2. Vertical distribution of minerals in well George T.W. A-8H. Bar charts are data derived from XRD and
LECO TOC analyses. Line graphs are mineral data calculated from elemental data.
FIGURE 2
10600
2.4
11300
2.3
2.4
10650
Gamma
0
API 250 0
EF Mo
EF U
EF Ni
- 100 0.5 -
31
EF V
5 0.5 -
11650
Chemostratigraphic
Units
31
EF V
5 0.5
API 250 0
EF Mo
EF U
EF Ni
- 100 0.5
31
EF V
5 0.5
Pa c k a g e 3
2.2
2.4
11100
11150
2.2
11800
Gamma
0
11050
2.3
2.3
2.2
2.1
2.1
2.1
10850
Package
1
2.1
10800
Package 0
Package 0 Package 1
Pa c k a g e 1
11850
11200
LA
TX
11500
11750
10750
11400
11450
10700
2.2
Package 2
Package 2
11350
EF U
EF Ni
- 100 0.5
Depth (ft)
2.4
11700
2.3
EF Mo
Chemostratigraphic
Units
Depth (ft)
API 250 0
Chemostratigraphic
Packages
Gamma
0
Package 2
5 0.5 -
Package 4 Packages
11600
Pac kage 3
31
Depth (ft)
Package 2
- 100 0.5 -
EF V
Chemostratigraphic
Units
API 250 0
EF U
EF Ni
Chemostratigraphic
Packages
Chemostratigraphic
Units
EF Mo
Package 0
11250
Package Chemostratigraphic
Packages
4
11200
Gamma
Pac kage
3
Depth (ft)
Chemostratigraphic
Watson-4
CLAIBORNE
Glaspie GU 10
Johnson Trust 1-2H
0
10
SCALE IN MILES
Figure 3. Selected element enrichment factors (EF) for wells Watson-4, Glaspie Ocie GU-10, Elm Grove Planation-63 and Johnson Trust 1-2H. (The inset map shows the
position of these wells). EFs for U(ppm), V(ppm), Mo(ppm) and Ni(ppm) have been the plotted for the study intervals in these wells, with Package 2 (the chemically
defined Haynesville formation) correlated for stratigraphic context.
56
shale exploration
LA
TX
1.65
1.
15
1.4
0
1.6
40
1.
Anoxic
Oxic / dysoxic
5
1.6
1.1
65
1.
1.4
5
1.65
EFVanadium
1.1
High
Enrichment
15
1.
0
1.40
Low
Enrichment
10
SCALE IN MILES
(avg.)
Terrigenous
content
10850
Zr/Nb (avg.)
18
SiO2/Al2O3
2
5 Terrigenous
SiO2/Al2O3
2
(avg.)
content
11050
11600
11100
Package 2
10750
11650
11150
11700
11200
Package 1
10800
Zr/Nb
- 18
11550
11750
Package 0
10700
Package 2
10650
Depth
(ft)
clay packages
Depth
(ft)
Williams 22 3
10600
Zr/Nb
- 18
Zr/Nb (avg.)
18
SiO2/Al2O3
2
5 Terrigenous
SiO2/Al2O3
2
(avg.)
content
SiO2/Al2O3
2
18
clay packages
Pac kage
3
SiO2/Al2O3
2
5
-
Package 2
Zr/Nb (avg.)
Zr/Nb
9
- 18
Depth
(ft)
clay packages
Glaspie
Package 1
1.1
Package 0
Deepening
Shallowing
Max regresssive surface
Max flooding surface
Alternating 2nd Order T-R cycle sets
Figure 5. Terrigenous content, SiO2/Al2O3 and Zr/Nb chemical logs plotted for selected wells to highlight long
term (1st Order) and shorter term (2nd Order) cyclical
fluctuations
in the geochemical data.
FIGURE
5
April/May 2012 | PESA News Resources |
57
shale exploration
58
SiO2 (%)
40
Conclusions
In Parts 1 and 2 of
this article, it has
been shown that the
50 element data set
acquired when carrying
out chemostratigraphy
on shales provides:
1. A means to
devise regional
stratigraphic
frameworks that can
be used for basin
modelling;
2. A means to
devise local,
high resolution
characterisations
that can be used to
determine well-bore
Terrestrial trend
Zr(ppm)
50
100
150
200
Haynesville Formation
SiO2 (%)
100
80
Terrestrial trend
60
40
20
0
Zr(ppm)
50
100
150
200
Figure 6. Zr vs. SiO2 binary plots for data from the Muskwa and Haynesville
formation. The positive linear tend line is termed the terrestrial trend and refers
to samples where SiO2 is derived from a terrestrial source. The negative linear
FIGURE
trend line is termed the biogenic
trend and6refers to samples where a significant
amount SiO2 is derived from biogenic sources.
shale exploration
(b)
20
SiO2/Al2O3
Al2O3 (%)
(a)
25
Eagle Ford Fm
low SiO2/Al2O3
15
Haynesville Fm
low CaO
4
Haynesville Fm
high SiO2/Al2O3
10
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
Eagle Ford Fm
high CaO
80
10
20
30
40
50
CaO (%)
SiO2 (%)
(d)
Zr (ppm)
(c)
250
Haynesville and Eagle Ford fms
terrigenous SiO2
200
25
15
100
10
50
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
eagle Ford Fm
low Na2O
20
150
Haynesville Fm
high Na2O
0
0.0
80
0.5
1.0
1.5
SiO2 (%)
(f)
20
15
20
10
Haynesville Fm
high Fe2O3
120 (ppm) V
25
15
Haynesville Fm
lowFe2O3
10
2.0
Na2O (%)
(e)
25
10
Fe2O3 (%)
Linear
relationship
100
No Linear
relationship
200
Haynesville Formation
Eagle Ford Formation
300
400
500
V (ppm)
Figure 7. A-F: Cross plots of selected elements displayed for datasets from Haynesville (white squares) and Eagle
Ford (black squares) formations.
FIGURE 7
60
Al2O3 (%)
References
Donovan, A., 2010. The sequence stratigraphy
family tree: understanding the portfolio of
sequence methodologies. In: Ratcliffe, K.T.
and Zaitlin B.A. (eds) Application of Modern
Stratigraphic Techniques: Theory and Case
Histories. SEPM Special Publication No. 94 p.
5-33.
Al2O3 (%)
Al2O3 (%)
Acknowledgements