Professional Documents
Culture Documents
1 of 9
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Maurya_Empire
Maurya Empire
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The Maurya Empire, also known as the Mauryan Empire, was a geographically extensive Iron Age historical power in ancient India, ruled by the Maurya dynasty from 322185 BCE. Originating
from the kingdom of Magadha in the Indo-Gangetic Plain (modern Bihar, eastern Uttar Pradesh) in the eastern side of the Indian subcontinent, the empire had its capital city at Pataliputra (modern
Patna).[1][2] The Empire was founded in 322 BCE by Chandragupta Maurya, who had overthrown the Nanda Dynasty and rapidly expanded his power westwards across central and western India,
alongside Chanakya's help, taking advantage of the disruptions of local powers in the wake of the withdrawal westward by Alexander the Great's armies. By 316 BCE the empire had fully occupied
Northwestern India, defeating and conquering the satraps left by Alexander.[3] Chandragupta then defeated the invasion led by Seleucus I, a Macedonian general from Alexander's army, gaining
additional territory west of the Indus River.[4]
Maurya Empire
The Maurya Empire was one of the largest empires of the world in its time. At its greatest extent, the empire stretched to the north along the natural boundaries of the Himalayas, to the east into Assam,
to the west into Balochistan (south west Pakistan and south east Iran) and the Hindu Kush mountains of what is now Afghanistan.[5] The Empire was expanded into India's central and southern
regions[6][7] by the emperors Chandragupta and Bindusara, but it excluded a small portion of unexplored tribal and forested regions near Kalinga (modern Odisha), until it was conquered by Ashoka.[8]
It declined for about 50 years after Ashoka's rule ended, and it dissolved in 185 BCE with the foundation of the Shunga dynasty in Magadha.
Under Chandragupta and his successors, internal and external trade, agriculture and economic activities, all thrived and expanded across India thanks to the creation of a single and efficient system of
finance, administration, and security. After the Kalinga War, the Empire experienced nearly half a century of peace and security under Ashoka. Mauryan India also enjoyed an era of social harmony,
religious transformation, and expansion of the sciences and of knowledge. Chandragupta Maurya's embrace of Jainism increased social and religious renewal and reform across his society, while
Ashoka's embrace of Buddhism has been said to have been the foundation of the reign of social and political peace and non-violence across all of India. Ashoka sponsored the spreading of Buddhist
ideals into Sri Lanka, Southeast Asia, West Asia[9] and Mediterranean Europe.[3]
The population of the empire has been estimated to be about 5060 million, making the Mauryan Empire one of the most populous empires of Antiquity.[10][11] Archaeologically, the period of Mauryan
rule in South Asia falls into the era of Northern Black Polished Ware (NBPW). The Arthashastra[12] and the Edicts of Ashoka are the primary sources of written records of Mauryan times. The Lion
Capital of Ashoka at Sarnath has been made the national emblem of India.
Contents
1 History
1.1 Chandragupta Maurya and Chanakya
1.2 Conquest of Magadha
1.3 Chandragupta Maurya
1.4 Bindusara
1.5 Ashoka the Great
1.6 Decline
1.6.1 Shunga coup (185 BCE)
1.6.2 Establishment of the Indo-Greek Kingdom (180 BCE)
2 Administration
3 Economy
4 Religion
4.1 Hinduism
4.2 Buddhism
4.3 Jainism
5 Architectural remains
6 Natural history in the times of the Mauryas
7 Contacts with the Hellenistic world
7.1 Foundation of the Empire
7.2 Reconquest of the Northwest (c. 317316 BCE)
7.3 Conflict and alliance with Seleucus (305 BCE)
7.3.1 Marital alliance
7.3.2 Exchange of ambassadors
7.3.3 Exchange of presents
7.4 Greek population in India
7.5 Buddhist missions to the West (c. 250 BCE)
7.6 Subhagasena and Antiochos III (206 BCE)
8 Timeline
9 See also
10 Notes
Capital
Pataliputra (Present-day
Patna)
Languages
Religion
Hinduism(Brahmanism)
Buddhism
Jainism
vika
Government
Absolute monarchy as
described in the
Arthashastra
Emperor
322298 BCE
298272 BCE
268232 BCE
232224 BCE
224215 BCE
215202 BCE
202195 BCE
195187 BCE
187185 BCE
Chandragupta
Bindusara
Ashoka
Dasharatha
Samprati
Shalishuka
Devavarman
Shatadhanvan
Brihadratha
Historical era
Established
Disestablished
Antiquity
322 BCE
185 BCE
Area
5,200,000 km
(2,007,731 sq mi)
Currency
Panas
Today part of
Afghanistan
Bangladesh
Bhutan
India
29/07/2016 18:12
2 of 9
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Maurya_Empire
Iran
Nepal
Pakistan
11 References
12 External links
History
219229.
(322297 BCE)
Bindusara
(297272/268 BCE)
Ashoka
(272/268232 BCE)
Dasharatha
(232224 BCE)
Samprati
(224215 BCE)
Shalishuka
(215202 BCE)
Devavarman
(202195 BCE)
Shatadhanvan
(195187 BCE)
Brihadratha
(187180 BCE)
Pushyamitra
(180149 BCE)
(Shunga Empire)
Conquest of Magadha
Chanakya encouraged Chandragupta Maurya and his army to take over the throne of Magadha. Using his intelligence network, Chandragupta gathered many young men from across Magadha and other provinces, men upset over the corrupt and
oppressive rule of king Dhana, plus the resources necessary for his army to fight a long series of battles. These men included the former general of Taxila, accomplished students of Chanakya, the representative of King Porus of Kakayee, his son
Malayketu, and the rulers of small states.
Preparing to invade Pataliputra, Maurya came up with a strategy. A battle was announced and the Magadhan army was drawn from the city to a distant battlefield to engage with Maurya's forces. Maurya's general and spies meanwhile bribed the
corrupt general of Nanda. He also managed to create an atmosphere of civil war in the kingdom, which culminated in the death of the heir to the throne. Chanakya managed to win over popular sentiment. Ultimately Nanda resigned, handing power to
Chandragupta, and went into exile and was never heard of again. Chanakya contacted the prime minister, Rakshasas, and made him understand that his loyalty was to Magadha, not to the Nanda dynasty, insisting that he continue in office. Chanakya
also reiterated that choosing to resist would start a war that would severely affect Magadha and destroy the city. Rakshasa accepted Chanakya's reasoning, and Chandragupta Maurya was legitimately installed as the new King of Magadha. Rakshasa
became Chandragupta's chief advisor, and Chanakya assumed the position of an elder statesman.
Chandragupta extended
the borders of the
Maurya Empire towards
Seleucid Persia after
defeating Seleucus c.
305 BCE.[19]
Chandragupta Maurya
later extended the
borders of the empire
southward into the
Deccan Plateau c.
300 BCE.[20]
Chandragupta Maurya
Chandragupta campaigned against the Macedonians when Seleucus I Nicator, in the process of creating the Seleucid Empire out of the eastern conquests of Alexander the Great, tried to reconquer the northwestern parts of India in 305 BCE. Seleucus
failed (SeleucidMauryan war), the two rulers finally concluded a peace treaty: a marital treaty (Epigamia) was concluded, in which the Greeks offered their Princess for alliance and help from him. Chandragupta snatched the satrapies of
Paropamisade (Kamboja and Gandhara), Arachosia (Kandhahar) and Gedrosia (Balochistan), and Seleucus I received 500 war elephants that were to have a decisive role in his victory against western Hellenistic kings at the Battle of Ipsus in
301 BCE. Diplomatic relations were established and several Greeks, such as the historian Megasthenes, Deimakos and Dionysius resided at the Mauryan court.
29/07/2016 18:12
3 of 9
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Maurya_Empire
Chandragupta established a strong centralized state with an administration at Pataliputra, which, according to Megasthenes, was "surrounded by a wooden wall pierced by 64 gates and 570 towers (and) rivaled the splendors of contemporaneous
Persian sites such as Susa and Ecbatana." Chandragupta's son Bindusara extended the rule of the Mauryan empire towards southern India. The famous Tamil poet Mamulanar of the Sangam literature described how the Deccan Plateau was invaded
by the Maurya army.[21] He also had a Greek ambassador at his court, named Deimachus Strabo.
Megasthenes describes a disciplined multitude under Chandragupta, who live simply, honestly, and do not know writing:
"The Indians all live frugally, especially when in camp. They dislike a great undisciplined multitude, and consequently they observe good order. Theft is of very rare occurrence. Megasthenes says that those who were in the camp of
Sandrakottos, wherein lay 400,000 men, found that the thefts reported on any one day did not exceed the value of two hundred drachmae, and this among a people who have no written laws, but are ignorant of writing, and must therefore in all
the business of life trust to memory. They live, nevertheless, happily enough, being simple in their manners and frugal. They never drink wine except at sacrifices. Their beverage is a liquor composed from rice instead of barley, and their food
is principally a rice-pottage." Strabo XV. i. 5356, quoting Megasthenes.
Bindusara
Bindusara was the son of the first Mauryan emperor Chandragupta Maurya and his queen Durdhara. During his reign, the empire expanded southwards. According to the Rajavalikatha a Jain work, the original name of this emperor was Simhasena.
According to a legend mentioned in the Jain texts, Chandragupta's Guru and advisor Chanakya used to feed the emperor with small doses of poison to build his immunity against possible poisoning attempts by the enemies.[22] One day, Chandragupta
not knowing about poison, shared his food with his pregnant wife queen Durdhara who was 7 days away from delivery. The queen not immune to the poison collapsed and died within few minutes. Chanakya entered the room the very time she
collapsed, and in order to save the child in the womb, he immediately cut open the dead queen's belly and took the baby out, by that time a drop of poison had already reached the baby and touched its head due to which child got a permanent blueish
spot (a "bindu") on his forehead. Thus, the newborn was named "Bindusara".[23]
Bindusara, just 22 years old, inherited a large empire that consisted of what is now, Northern, Central and Eastern parts of India along with parts of Afghanistan and Baluchistan. Bindusara extended this empire to the southern part of India, as far as
what is now known as Karnataka. He brought sixteen states under the Mauryan Empire and thus conquered almost all of the Indian peninsula (he is said to have conquered the 'land between the two seas' the peninsular region between the Bay of
Bengal and the Arabian Sea). Bindusara didn't conquer the friendly Tamil kingdoms of the Cholas, ruled by King Ilamcetcenni, the Pandyas, and Cheras. Apart from these southern states, Kalinga (modern Odisha) was the only kingdom in India that
didn't form the part of Bindusara's empire. It was later conquered by his son Ashoka, who served as the viceroy of Ujjaini during his father's reign.
Bindusara's life has not been documented as well as that of his father Chandragupta or of his son Ashoka. Chanakya continued to serve as prime minister during his reign. According to the medieval Tibetan scholar Taranatha who visited India,
Chanakya helped Bindusara "to destroy the nobles and kings of the sixteen kingdoms and thus to become absolute master of the territory between the eastern and western oceans."[24] During his rule, the citizens of Taxila revolted twice. The reason
for the first revolt was the maladministration of Suseema, his eldest son. The reason for the second revolt is unknown, but Bindusara could not suppress it in his lifetime. It was crushed by Ashoka after Bindusara's death.
Ambassadors from the Seleucid Empire (such as Deimachus) and Egypt visited his courts. He maintained good relations with the Hellenic World.
Unlike his father Chandragupta (who at a later stage converted to Jainism), Bindusara believed in the Ajivika sect. Bindusara's guru Pingalavatsa (alias Janasana) was a Brahmin[25] of the Ajivika sect. Bindusara's wife, Queen Subhadrangi (alias
Queen Aggamahesi) was a Brahmin[26] also of the Ajivika sect from Champa (present Bhagalpur district). Bindusara is accredited with giving several grants to Brahmin monasteries (Brahmana-bhatto).[27]
Bindusara died in 272 BCE (some records say 268 BCE) and was succeeded by his son Ashoka.
Decline
Ashoka was followed for 50 years by a succession of weaker kings. Brihadratha, the last ruler of the Mauryan dynasty, held territories that had shrunk considerably from the time of emperor Ashoka. Brihadratha was assassinated in 185 BCE during a
military parade by the Brahmin general Pushyamitra Shunga, commander-in-chief of his guard, who then took over the throne and established the Shunga dynasty.[29]
Shunga coup (185 BCE)
29/07/2016 18:12
4 of 9
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Maurya_Empire
Buddhist records such as the Ashokavadana write that the assassination of Brihadratha and the rise of the Shunga empire led to a wave of religious persecution for Buddhists,[30] and a resurgence of Hinduism.
According to Sir John Marshall,[31] Pushyamitra may have been the main author of the persecutions, although later Shunga kings seem to have been more supportive of Buddhism. Other historians, such as Etienne
Lamotte[32] and Romila Thapar,[33] among others, have argued that archaeological evidence in favour of the allegations of persecution of Buddhists are lacking, and that the extent and magnitude of the atrocities
have been exaggerated. However, recent studies of Professor Giovanni Verardi, published in his book Hardships and Decline of Buddhism in India, have clearly shown on the basis of archaeological evidence that
violence was very often used against Buddhists.
Establishment of the Indo-Greek Kingdom (180 BCE)
The fall of the Mauryas left the Khyber Pass unguarded, and a wave of foreign invasion followed. The Greco-Bactrian king, Demetrius, capitalized on the break-up, and he conquered southern Afghanistan and
Ashoka pillar at Vaishali
parts of northwestern India around 180 BCE, forming the Indo-Greek Kingdom. The Indo-Greeks would maintain holdings on the trans-Indus region, and make forays into central India, for about a century. Under
them, Buddhism flourished, and one of their kings Menander became a famous figure of Buddhism, he was to establish a new capital of Sagala, the modern city of Sialkot. However, the extent of their domains and
the lengths of their rule are subject to much debate. Numismatic evidence indicates that they retained holdings in the subcontinent right up to the birth of Christ. Although the extent of their successes against indigenous powers such as the Shungas,
Satavahanas, and Kalingas are unclear, what is clear is that Scythian tribes, renamed Indo-Scythians, brought about the demise of the Indo-Greeks from around 70 BCE and retained lands in the trans-Indus, the region of Mathura, and Gujarat.
Administration
The Empire was divided into four provinces, with the imperial capital at Pataliputra. From Ashokan edicts, the names of the four provincial capitals are Tosali (in the east), Ujjain (in the west), Suvarnagiri (in
the south), and Taxila (in the north). The head of the provincial administration was the Kumara (royal prince), who governed the provinces as king's representative. The kumara was assisted by Mahamatyas and
council of ministers. This organizational structure was reflected at the imperial level with the Emperor and his Mantriparishad (Council of Ministers).
Historians theorize that the organization of the Empire was in line with the extensive bureaucracy described by Kautilya in the Arthashastra: a sophisticated civil service governed everything from municipal
hygiene to international trade. The expansion and defense of the empire was made possible by what appears to have been one of the largest armies in the world during the Iron Age.[34] According to
Megasthenes, the empire wielded a military of 600,000 infantry, 30,000 cavalry, and 9,000 war elephants alone not including tributary state allies. [35] A vast espionage system collected intelligence for both
internal and external security purposes. Having renounced offensive warfare and expansionism, Ashoka nevertheless continued to maintain this large army, to protect the Empire and instill stability and peace
across West and South Asia.
Economy
For the first time in South Asia, political unity and military security allowed for a common economic system and enhanced trade and commerce, with increased agricultural productivity. The previous situation
involving hundreds of kingdoms, many small armies, powerful regional chieftains, and internecine warfare, gave way to a disciplined central authority. Farmers were freed of tax and crop collection burdens
from regional kings, paying instead to a nationally administered and strict-but-fair system of taxation as advised by the principles in the Arthashastra. Chandragupta Maurya established a single currency across
India, and a network of regional governors and administrators and a civil service provided justice and security for merchants, farmers and traders. The Mauryan army wiped out many gangs of bandits, regional
private armies, and powerful chieftains who sought to impose their own supremacy in small areas. Although regimental in revenue collection, Maurya also sponsored many public works and waterways to
enhance productivity, while internal trade in India expanded greatly due to new-found political unity and internal peace.
Under the Indo-Greek friendship treaty, and during Ashoka's reign, an international network of trade expanded. The Khyber Pass, on the modern boundary of Pakistan and
Afghanistan, became a strategically important port of trade and intercourse with the outside world. Greek states and Hellenic kingdoms in West Asia became important
trade partners of India. Trade also extended through the Malay peninsula into Southeast Asia. India's exports included silk goods and textiles, spices and exotic foods. The
external world came across new scientific knowledge and technology with expanding trade with the Mauryan Empire. Ashoka also sponsored the construction of
thousands of roads, waterways, canals, hospitals, rest-houses and other public works. The easing of many over-rigorous administrative practices, including those regarding
taxation and crop collection, helped increase productivity and economic activity across the Empire.
Bas rifel from Stupa, 3rd century
BCE.
In many ways, the economic situation in the Mauryan Empire is analogous to the Roman Empire of several centuries later. Both had extensive trade connections and both
had organizations similar to corporations. While Rome had organizational entities which were largely used for public state-driven projects, Mauryan India had numerous
private commercial entities. These existed purely for private commerce and developed before the Mauryan Empire itself.[36] (See also Economic history of India.)
Religion
Hinduism
Hinduism was the major religion at the time of inception of the empire,[37] Hindu priests and ministers used to be an important part of the emperor's court, e.g. Chanakya. James Hastings writes that they are
devotees of Narayana (Vishnu), although Shilanka speaking of the Ekandandins in another connection identifies them as Shaivas (devotees of Shiva). [38] Scholar James Hastings identifies the name
"Mankhaliputta" or "Mankhali" with the bamboo staff.[38] Scholar Jitendra N. Banerjea compares them to the Pasupatas Shaivas.[39] Another scholar, Charpentier, believes that the Ajivikas worshiped Shiva
before Makkhali Goshala.[40] As Chanakya wrote in his text Chanakya Niti, "Humbly bowing down before the almighty Lord Sri Vishnu, the Lord of the three worlds, I recite maxims of the science of political
ethics (niti) selected from the various satras (scriptures)".[41]
Even after embracing Buddhism, Ashoka retained the membership of Hindu Brahmana priests and ministers in his court. Mauryan society began embracing the philosophy of ahimsa, and given the increased
prosperity and improved law enforcement, crime and internal conflicts reduced dramatically. Also greatly discouraged was the caste system and orthodox discrimination, as Mauryans began to absorb the ideals
and values of Jain and Buddhist teachings along with traditional Vedic Hindu teachings.
29/07/2016 18:12
5 of 9
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Maurya_Empire
Buddhism
Magadha, the centre of the empire, was also the birthplace of Buddhism. Ashoka initially practised Hinduism but later embraced Buddhism; following the Kalinga War, he renounced expansionism and
aggression, and the harsher injunctions of the Arthashastra on the use of force, intensive policing, and ruthless measures for tax collection and against rebels. Ashoka sent a mission led by his son Mahinda and
daughter Sanghamitta to Sri Lanka, whose king Tissa was so charmed with Buddhist ideals that he adopted them himself and made Buddhism the state religion. Ashoka sent many Buddhist missions to West
Asia, Greece and South East Asia, and commissioned the construction of monasteries, schools and publication of Buddhist literature across the empire. He is believed to have built as many as 84,000 stupas
across India i.e. Sanchi and Mahabodhi Temple, and he increased the popularity of Buddhism in Afghanistan, Thailand and North Asia including Siberia. Ashoka helped convene the Third Buddhist Council of
India and South Asia's Buddhist orders, near his capital, a council that undertook much work of reform and expansion of the Buddhist religion. Indian merchants embraced Buddhism and played a large role in
spreading the religion across the Mauryan Empire.[42]
Jainism
Chandragupta Maurya embraced Jainism after retiring. At an older age, he renounced his throne and material possessions to join a wandering group of Jain monks. Chandragupta was a disciple of the Jain monk,
Bhadrabahu. It is said that in his last days, he observed the rigorous but self-purifying Jain ritual of santhara i.e. fast unto death, at Shravana Belgola in Karnataka.[43][44][45][46] However, his successor,
Bindusara, was a follower of another ascetic movement,
vika,[47] and distanced himself from Jain and Buddhist movements. Samprati, the grandson of Ashoka also embraced Jainism. Samprati was
influenced by the teachings of Jain monks and he is known to have built 125,000 derasars across India. Some of them are still found in towns of Ahmedabad, Viramgam, Ujjain & Palitana. It is also said that just
like Ashoka, Samprati sent messengers & preachers to Greece, Persia & Middle East for the spread of Jainism. But to date no research has been done in this area.[48][49]
Thus, Jainism became a vital force under the Mauryan Rule. Chandragupta and Samprati are credited for the spread of Jainism in South India. Lakhs of temples and stupas were erected during their reign. But
due to lack of royal patronage and its strict principles, along with the rise of Shankaracharya and Ramanuja, Jainism, once a major religion of southern India, began to decline.
Architectural remains
The greatest monument of this period, executed in the reign of Chandragupta Maurya, was the old palace at the site of Kumhrar. Excavations at the site of Kumhrar nearby have unearthed the remains of the
palace. The palace is thought to have been an aggregate of buildings, the most important of which was an immense pillared hall supported on a high substratum of timbers. The pillars were set in regular rows,
thus dividing the hall into a number of smaller square bays. The number of columns is 80, each about 20 high. According to the eyewitness account of Megasthenes, informs that the palace was chiefly constructed of
timber, was considered to excel in splendour and magnificence palaces of Susa and Ekabatna, it's glided pillars, being adorned with golden vines and silver birds. The buildings, stood in an extensive park studded
with fish ponds and furnished with a great variety of ornamental trees and shrubs.[50] Kau ilya's Arthashastra also gives method of palace construction from this period. Later Fragments of stone pillars, including one
nearly complete, with their round tapering shafts and smooth polish indicate that Ashoka was responsible for the construction of the stone columns which replaced the earlier wooden ones.
During Ashokan period stonework was highly diversified order and comprised lofty free-standing pillars, railings of stupas, lion thrones and other colossal figures. The use of stone had reached great perfection during
this time that even small fragments of stone art was given a high lustrous polish resembling fine enamel. This period marked the beginning of the Buddhist school of architecture, Ashoka was responsible for the
construction of several stupas, which were large halls, capped with domes and bore symbols of Buddha. The most important ones are located at Sanchi, Bharhut, Amaravati, Bodhgaya and Nagarjunakonda. Most
widespread example of Mauryan architecture are the Pillars and edicts of Ashoka, often exquisitely decorated, with more than 40 spread throughout the Indian subcontinent.[51]
On the border of the forest, he should establish a forest for elephants guarded by foresters. The Office of the Chief Elephant Forrester should with the help of guards protect the elephants in any terrain. The slaying of an elephant is
punishable by death..
Arthashastra
The Mauryas also designated separate forests to protect supplies of timber, as well as lions and tigers, for skins. Elsewhere the Protector of Animals also worked to eliminate thieves, tigers and other predators to render the woods safe for grazing
cattle.
The Mauryas valued certain forest tracts in strategic or economic terms and instituted curbs and control measures over them. They regarded all forest tribes with distrust and controlled them with bribery and political subjugation. They employed
some of them, the food-gatherers or aranyaca to guard borders and trap animals. The sometimes tense and conflict-ridden relationship nevertheless enabled the Mauryas to guard their vast empire.[53]
When Ashoka embraced Buddhism in the latter part of his reign, he brought about significant changes in his style of governance, which included providing protection to fauna, and even relinquished the royal hunt. He was the first ruler in history to
advocate conservation measures for wildlife and even had rules inscribed in stone edicts. The edicts proclaim that many followed the king's example in giving up the slaughter of animals; one of them proudly states: [53]
Our king killed very few animals.
29/07/2016 18:12
6 of 9
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Maurya_Empire
"Later, as he was preparing war against the prefects of Alexander, a huge wild elephant went to him and took him on his back as if tame, and he became a remarkable fighter and war leader. Having thus acquired
royal power, Sandracottos possessed India at the time Seleucos was preparing future glory." Justin XV.4.19[56]
"Always lying in wait for the neighbouring nations, strong in arms and persuasive in council, he [Seleucus] acquired Mesopotamia, Armenia, 'Seleucid' Cappadocia, Persis,
Parthia, Bactria, Arabia, Tapouria, Sogdia, Arachosia, Hyrcania, and other adjacent peoples that had been subdued by Alexander, as far as the river Indus, so that the boundaries
of his empire were the most extensive in Asia after that of Alexander. The whole region from Phrygia to the Indus was subject to Seleucus". Appian, History of Rome, The Syrian
Wars 55[57]
Though no accounts of the conflict remain, it is clear that Seleucus fared poorly against the Indian Emperor as he failed in conquering any territory, and in fact, was forced to
surrender much that was already his. Regardless, Seleucus and Chandragupta ultimately reached a settlement and through a treaty sealed in 305 BCE, Seleucus, according to
Strabo, ceded a number of territories to Chandragupta, including large parts of what is now Afghanistan and parts of Balochistan.
Accordingly, Seleucus obtained five hundred war elephants, a military asset which would play a decisive role at the Battle of Ipsus in 301 BCE.
Marital alliance
It is generally thought that Chandragupta married Seleucus's daughter, or a Greek Macedonian princess, a gift from Seleucus to formalize an alliance. In a return gesture, Chandragupta sent 500 war elephants,[19][58]
[59][60][61][62] a military asset which would play a decisive role at the Battle of Ipsus in 302 BCE. In addition to this treaty, Seleucus dispatched an ambassador, Megasthenes, to Chandragupta, and later Deimakos to his
son Bindusara, at the Mauryan court at Pataliputra (modern Patna in Bihar state). Later Ptolemy II Philadelphus, the ruler of Ptolemaic Egypt and contemporary of Ashoka the Great, is also recorded by Pliny the Elder
as having sent an ambassador named Dionysius to the Mauryan court.[63]
Mainstream scholarship asserts that Chandragupta received vast territory west of the Indus, including the Hindu Kush, modern-day Afghanistan, and the Balochistan province of Pakistan. [64][65] Archaeologically,
concrete indications of Mauryan rule, such as the inscriptions of the Edicts of Ashoka, are known as far as Kandahar in southern Afghanistan.
"He (Seleucus) crossed the Indus and waged war with Sandrocottus [Maurya], king of the Indians, who dwelt on the banks of that stream, until they came to an understanding with each other and contracted a marriage relationship."
"After having made a treaty with him (Sandrakotos) and put in order the Orient situation, Seleucos went to war against Antigonus."
The treaty on "Epigamia" implies lawful marriage between Greeks and Indians was recognized at the State level, although it is unclear whether it occurred among dynastic rulers or common people, or both.
Exchange of ambassadors
29/07/2016 18:12
7 of 9
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Maurya_Empire
Seleucus dispatched an ambassador, Megasthenes, to Chandragupta, and later Deimakos to his son Bindusara, at the Mauryan court at Pataliputra (Modern Patna in Bihar state). Later Ptolemy II Philadelphus, the ruler of Ptolemaic Egypt and
contemporary of Ashoka, is also recorded by Pliny the Elder as having sent an ambassador named Dionysius to the Mauryan court.[63]
Exchange of presents
Classical sources have also recorded that following their treaty, Chandragupta and Seleucus exchanged presents, such as when Chandragupta sent various aphrodisiacs to Seleucus:
"And Theophrastus says that some contrivances are of wondrous efficacy in such matters [as to make people more amorous]. And Phylarchus confirms him, by reference to some of the presents which Sandrakottus, the king of the Indians, sent
to Seleucus; which were to act like charms in producing a wonderful degree of affection, while some, on the contrary, were to banish love" Athenaeus of Naucratis, "The deipnosophists" Book I, chapter 32[66]
His son Bindusara 'Amitraghata' (Slayer of Enemies) also is recorded in Classical sources as having exchanged present with Antiochus I:
"But dried figs were so very much sought after by all men (for really, as Aristophanes says, "There's really nothing nicer than dried figs"), that even Amitrochates, the king of the Indians, wrote to Antiochus, entreating him (it is Hegesander
who tells this story) to buy and send him some sweet wine, and some dried figs, and a sophist; and that Antiochus wrote to him in answer, "The dry figs and the sweet wine we will send you; but it is not lawful for a sophist to be sold in Greece"
Athenaeus, "Deipnosophistae" XIV.67[67]
Ashoka also claims that he encouraged the development of herbal medicine, for men and animals, in their territories:
"Everywhere within Beloved-of-the-Gods, King Piyadasi's [Ashoka's] domain, and among the people beyond the borders, the Cholas, the Pandyas, the Satiyaputras, the Keralaputras, as far as Tamraparni
and where the Greek king Antiochos rules, and among the kings who are neighbors of Antiochos, everywhere has Beloved-of-the-Gods, King Piyadasi, made provision for two types of medical treatment:
medical treatment for humans and medical treatment for animals. Wherever medical herbs suitable for humans or animals are not available, I have had them imported and grown. Wherever medical roots
or fruits are not available I have had them imported and grown. Along roads I have had wells dug and trees planted for the benefit of humans and animals". 2nd Rock Edict
The Greeks in India even seem to have played an active role in the propagation of Buddhism, as some of the emissaries of Ashoka, such as Dharmaraksita, are described in Pali sources as leading Greek
("Yona") Buddhist monks, active in Buddhist proselytism (the Mahavamsa, XII[69]).
Timeline
29/07/2016 18:12
8 of 9
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Maurya_Empire
1. 322 BCE : Chandragupta Maurya founded the Mauryan Empire by overthrowing the Nanda Dynasty.
2. 317316 BCE : Chandragupta Maurya conquers the Northwest of the Indian subcontinent.
3. 305303 BCE : Chandragupta Maurya gains territory from the Seleucid Empire.
4. 298269 BCE : Reign of Bindusara, Chandragupta's son. He conquers parts of Deccan, southern India.
5. 269232 BCE : The Mauryan Empire reaches its height under Ashoka, Chandragupta's grandson.
6. 261 BCE : Ashoka conquers the kingdom of Kalinga.
7. 250 BCE : Ashoka builds Buddhist stupas and erects pillars bearing inscriptions.
8. 184 BCE : The empire collapses when Brihadnatha, the last emperor, is killed by Pushyamitra Shunga, a Mauryan general and the founder of the Shunga Empire.
See also
Mauryan art
Magadha
Pradyota dynasty
Nanda Dynasty
Gupta Empire
History of India
List of largest empires that existed in India
Notes
1. Kulke, Hermann; Rothermund, Dietmar (2004). A History of India. 4th edition.
Routledge, Pp. xii, 448. ISBN 0-415-32920-5.
2. Thapar, Romila (1990). A History of India, Volume 1. New Delhi and London:
Penguin Books. Pp. 384. ISBN 0-14-013835-8.
3. Rajadhyaksha, Abhijit (2009-08-02). "The Mauryas: Chandragupta".
Historyfiles.co.uk. Retrieved 2012-03-01.
4. Seleucus I ceded the territories of Arachosia (modern Kandahar), Gedrosia (modern
Balochistan), and Paropamisadae (or Gandhara). Aria (modern Herat) "has been
wrongly included in the list of ceded satrapies by some scholars [...] on the basis of
wrong assessments of the passage of Strabo [...] and a statement by Pliny."
(Raychaudhuri & Mukherjee 1996, p. 594). Seleucus "must [...] have held Aria",
and furthermore, his "son Antiochos was active there fifteen years later." (Grainger
2014, p. 109).
5. The account of Strabo indicates that the western-most territory of the empire
extended from the southeastern Hindu Kush, through the region of Kandahar, to
coastal Balochistan to the south of that (Raychaudhuri & Mukherjee 1996, p. 594).
6. Sri Lanka and the southernmost parts of India (modern Tamil Nadu and Kerala)
remained independent, despite the diplomacy and cultural influence of their larger
neighbor to the north (Schwartzberg 1992, p. 18; Kulke & Rothermund 2004, p.
68).
7. The empire was once thought to have directly controlled most of the Indian
subcontinent excepting the far south, but its core regions are now thought to have
been separated by large tribal regions (especially in the Deccan peninsula) that
were relatively autonomous. (Kulke & Rothermund 2004, p. 68-71, as well as Stein
1998, p. 74). "The major part of the Deccan was ruled by [Mauryan
administration]. But in the belt of land on either side of the Nerbudda, the Godavari
and the upper Mahanadi there were, in all probability, certain areas that were
technically outside the limits of the empire proper. Ashoka evidently draws a
distinction between the forests and the inhabiting tribes which are in the dominions
(vijita) and peoples on the border (anta avijita) for whose benefit some of the
special edicts were issued. Certain vassal tribes are specifically mentioned."
(Raychaudhuri & Mukherjee pp. 2756)
8. Kalinga had been conquered by the preceding Nanda Dynasty but subsequently
broke free until it was re-conquered by Ashoka, c. 260 BCE. (Raychaudhuri &
Mukherjee, pp. 204209, pp. 270271)
9. "Buddhism in Iran, Mehrak Golestan". iranian.com. 2004-12-15. Retrieved
2014-07-25.
10. Boesche, Roger (2003-03-01). The First Great Political Realist: Kautilya and His
Arthashastra. p. 11. ISBN 9780739106075.
11. Demeny, Paul George; McNicoll, Geoffrey (May 2003). Encyclopedia of
population. ISBN 9780028656793.
12. "It is doubtful if, in its present shape, [the Arthashastra] is as old as the time of the
first Maurya," as it probably contains layers of text ranging from Maurya times till
as late as the 2nd century CE. Nonetheless, "though a comparatively late work, it
may be used [...] to confirm and supplement the information gleaned from earlier
sources." (Raychaudhuri & Mukherjee 1996, pp.2467)
13. Sugandhi, Namita Sanjay (2008). Between the Patterns of History: Rethinking
Mauryan Imperial Interaction in the Southern Deccan. pp. 8889.
ISBN 9780549744412. Retrieved 2016-02-20.
14. :"Androcottus, when he was a stripling, saw Alexander himself, and we are told
that he often said in later times that Alexander narrowly missed making himself
master of the country, since its king was hated and despised on account of his
baseness and low birth." Plutarch 62-3 Plutarch 62-3 (http://www.perseus.tufts.edu
/cgi-bin/ptext?doc=Perseus%3Atext%3A1999.01.0243&layout=&loc=62.1)
15. :"He was of humble Indian to a change of rule." Justin XV.4.15 "Fuit hic humili
quidem genere natus, sed ad regni potestatem maiestate numinis inpulsus. Quippe
cum procacitate sua Nandrum regem offendisset, interfici a rege iussus salutem
pedum ceieritate quaesierat. (Ex qua fatigatione cum somno captus iaceret, leo
ingentis formae ad dormientem accessit sudoremque profluentem lingua ei detersit
expergefactumque blande reliquit. Hoc prodigio primum ad spem regni inpulsus)
contractis latronibus Indos ad nouitatem regni sollicitauit." Justin XV.4.15
(http://www.forumromanum.org/literature/justin/texte15.html)
16.
"asti tava Shaka-Yavana-Kirata-Kamboja-Parasika-Bahlika parbhutibhih
Chankyamatipragrahittaishcha Chandergupta Parvateshvara
balairudidhibhiriva parchalitsalilaih samantaad uprudham Kusumpurama"
(Sanskrit original, Mudrarakshasa 2).
17. The Hunas mentioned in Mudrarakshasa play (II) of Vishakhadatta are same
people as the Harahunas of the Mahabharata (II.32.12). They were located in
Herat/Aria according to Dr Moti Chandra and were an earlier branch of the Hunas
(See: Geographical and Economic Studies in the Mah bh rata: Up yana Parva,
1945, p 66, Dr Moti Chandra; Also: Studies in the Geography of Ancient and
Medieval India, 1971, p 33, Dr D. C. Sircar.)
18. For Harahunas being a group of the Hunas, see also: Early History of Iranians and
Atharvaveda, Persica-9, 1980, p 118, Dr Michael Witzel, Harvard University.
19. Majumdar 2003, p. 105.
20. Radhakumud Mookerji (1988). Chandragupta Maurya and His Times (p. 39).
Motilal Banarsidass Publ. ISBN 81-208-0405-8.
21. A History of Ancient and Early Medieval India: From the Stone Age to the 12th
century by Upinder Singh p.331
22. Wilhelm Geiger (1908). The D pava sa and Mah va sa and their historical
development in Ceylon. Ethel M. Coomaraswamy. H. C. Cottle, Government
Printer, Ceylon. p. 40. OCLC 559688590.
23. M. Srinivasachariar (1989). History of classical Sanskrit literature (3 ed.). Motilal
Banarsidass. p. 550. ISBN 978-81-208-0284-1.
24. P.109 A brief history of India by Alain Danilou, Kenneth Hurry
25. P. 138 and P. 146 History and doctrines of the vikas: a vanished Indian religion
by Arthur Llewellyn Basham
29/07/2016 18:12
9 of 9
/trad15.html)
56. "Molienti deinde bellum aduersus praefectos Alexandri elephantus ferus infinitae
magnitudinis ultro se obtulit et ueluti domita mansuetudine eum tergo excepit
duxque belli et proeliator insignis fuit. Sic adquisito regno Sandrocottus ea
tempestate, qua Seleucus futurae magnitudinis fundamenta iaciebat, Indiam
possidebat." Justin XV.4.19 (http://www.forumromanum.org/literature/justin
/trad15.html)
57. "Appian, The Syrian Wars 11".
58. Ancient India, (Kachroo, p.196)
59. The Imperial Gazetteer of India, (Hunter, p.167)
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Maurya_Empire
References
Samuel, Geoffrey (2010), The Origins of Yoga and Tantra. Indic Religions to the Thirteenth Century, Cambridge University Press
Kulke, Hermann; Rothermund, Dietmar (2004), A History of India (4th ed.), London: Routledge, ISBN 0-415-15481-2
Thapar, Romila (2004) [first published by Penguin in 2002], Early India: From the Origins to A.D. 1300, University of California Press, ISBN 978-0-520-24225-8
Keay, John (2000). India, a History. New York: Harper Collins Publishers.
Stein, Burton (1998). A History of India (1st ed.), Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.
Raychaudhuri, H. C.; Mukherjee, B. N. (1996). Political History of Ancient India: From the Accession of Parikshit to the Extinction of the Gupta Dynasty. Oxford University Press.
Schwartzberg, J. E. (1992). A Historical Atlas of South Asia. University of Oxford Press.
Grainger, John D. (1990, 2014). Seleukos Nikator: Constructing a Hellenistic Kingdom. Routledge.
Mookerji, Radha Kumud (1988) [first published in 1966], Chandragupta Maurya and his times (4th ed.), Motilal Banarsidass, ISBN 81-208-0433-3
Cort, John (2010) [1953], Framing the Jina: Narratives of Icons and Idols in Jain History, Oxford University Press, ISBN 978-0-19-538502-1
Majumdar, Ramesh Chandra (2003) [1952], Ancient India, Motilal Banarsidass, ISBN 81-208-0436-8
Arthur Llewellyn Basham (1951), History and doctrines of the vikas: a vanished Indian religion, foreword by L. D. Barnett (1 ed.), London: Luzac
Chanakya, Arthashastra ISBN 0-14-044603-6 (http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/0140446036)
J.F.C. Fuller, The Generalship of Alexander the Great ISBN 0-306-81330-0 (http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/0306813300)
Robert Morkot, The Penguin Historical Atlas of Ancient Greece ISBN 0-14-051335-3 (http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/0140513353)
External links
Livius.org: Maurya dynasty (http://www.livius.org/man-md/mauryas/mauryas.html)
Extent of the Empire (http://www.kamat.com/kalranga/ancient/maurya.htm)
Ashoka's Edicts (http://www.cs.colostate.edu/~malaiya/ashoka.html)
Preceded by
Nanda dynasty
Magadha dynasties
Succeeded by
Shunga
dynasty
29/07/2016 18:12