You are on page 1of 25

REVAMP PHASE 2 PROJECT

SEISMIC STUDY CODE


UBC-1997 vs SNI-03-1726-2002

CIVIL ENG SECTION


PT PFN

EXOR I- BALONGAN

REVAMP PHASE 2 PROJECT


SEISMIC STUDY CODE
UBC-1997 vs SNI-03-1726-2002

UBC-1997
EARTHQUAKE LOAD FORMULA :

0.11CaIW < V = CvIW < 2.5CaIW


RT
R

SNI-03-1726-2002
EARTHQUAKE LOAD FORMULA :

V = C1 I W
R

V = Base Shear
Cv= Earthquake Response Factor
I = Importance Factor
R = Earthquake Reduction Factor
W = Total Weight of Structure
T = Natural Period of Structure
In Revamp Phase II Pj V= 0.214 W

V = Base Shear
C1 = Earthquake Response Factor
I = Importance Factor
R = Earthquake Reduction Factor
W = Total Weight of Structure

PROJECT CONDITION
LOCATION : BALONGAN
WEST JAWA
Zone : 2 A
PGA : 0.15 G
Soil Profile : SE
With PGA 0.1 G (SNI-03-1726-2002) ---Zone 2A

PROJECT CONDITION
LOCATION : BALONGAN
WEST JAWA
Zone : 2
PGA : 0.1 G
Soil Profile : Soft

CIVIL ENG SECTION


PT PFN

RISK
Chance BQ
Increase due
to Increasing
Earthquake
Load

In Revamp Phase II Pj V= 0.229 W

NA

REVAMP PHASE 2 PROJECT


SEISMIC STUDY CODE
UBC-1997 vs SNI-03-1726-2002

CIVIL ENG SECTION


PT PFN

REVAMP PHASE 2 PROJECT


SEISMIC STUDY CODE
UBC-1997 vs SNI-03-1726-2002

UBC-1997

SNI-03-1726-2002

RESPONSE SPECTRUM :

RESPONSE SPECTRUM :

Ca = 0.3
Cv = 0.5

Response Spectrum Comparison

C =Response Spectrum

0,8
0,7
0,6
0,5
0,4
0,3
0,2
0,1
0
0

Time Periode
SNI-03-1726-2002

UBC-1997

CIVIL ENG SECTION


PT PFN

RISK
Chance BQ
Increase due
to Increasing
Earthquake
Load

REVAMP PHASE 2 PROJECT

CIVIL ENG SECTION


PT PFN

SEISMIC STUDY CODE


UBC-1997 vs SNI-03-1726-2002

UBC-1997

SNI-03-1726-2002

RISK

IMPORTANCE FACTOR :
I = 1.0
Refer to Table 16 K Occupancy Category,
Structure in Revamp phase 2 categorized Standard
Occupancy Structure

IMPORTANCE FACTOR :
I = 1.6
Refer to Table 1 Significance Factor
Structure in Revamp phase 2 categorized Building for
storing dangerous goods

Chance BQ
Increase due to
Increasing
Earthquake Load

Earthquake Reduction Factor


R = 5.5 for IMRF
R = 3.5 for OMRF
For Zone 2 IMRF shall be applied

Earthquake Reduction Factor


R = 5.5 for Medium M Bearing Frame
R = 3.5 for Common M Bearing Frame

NA

DYNAMIC ANALYSIS REQUIREMENT :

DYNAMIC ANALYSIS REQUIREMENT :

MH Increase

Structure Height less than 19. 00 (regular or irregular),


Dynamic Analysis is not Required

Most Structure having irregularity Required Dynamic


Analysis

REVAMP PHASE 2 PROJECT

CIVIL ENG SECTION


PT PFN

SEISMIC STUDY CODE


UBC-1997 vs SNI-03-1726-2002
IMPORTANCE FACTOR
UBC-1997

SNI-03-1726-2002

REVAMP PHASE 2 PROJECT


SEISMIC STUDY CODE
UBC-1997 vs SNI-03-1726-2002
UBC-1997

EARTHQUAKE REDUCTION
FACTOR

CIVIL ENG SECTION


PT PFN

SNI-03-1726-2002

REVAMP PHASE 2 PROJECT

UBC-1997

SEISMIC STUDY CODE


UBC-1997 vs SNI-03-1726-2002
DYNAMIC ANALYSIS REQ

CIVIL ENG SECTION


PT PFN

SNI-03-1726-2002

REVAMP PHASE 2 PROJECT


SEISMIC STUDY CODE
UBC-1997 vs SNI-03-1726-2002

UBC-1997
DRIFT LIMITATION :
Maximum Inelastic Response
Drift Ratio < 0.02 for T<0.7 second
< 0.025 for T>=0.7 second

CIVIL ENG SECTION


PT PFN

SNI-03-1726-2002

RISK

DRIFT LIMITATION :
Service Limit Performance
max drift ratio < 0.03/R
< 30 mm
Ultimate Limit Performance
max drift ratio < 0.02

Common
practice so far
never check
this
requirement

ECCENTRICITY :
Considered as Horizontal Torsional Moment

ECCENTRICITY :
Considered as additional eccentricity (distance from
center of rotation to center of mass each floor)

In Revamp Phase II Pj will not be applied

In Revamp Phase II Pj will not be applied

Common
practice so far
never check
this
requirement

VERTICAL EARTHQUAKE LOAD :


Ev = 0.5 Ca I D
To be applied on Strength Design and may be zero on
Allowable Strength Design

VERTICAL EARTHQUAKE LOAD :


- Applied on structure that sensitive w/ vertical load
( cantilever or long span beam)
-Ev = Ao I W

In Revamp Phase II Pj V= 0.15 W

-In Revamp Phase II Pj V= 0.16 W will not be applied

In Revamp Phase II Pj will not be applied interstory drift,


Overall drift only

NA

REVAMP PHASE 2 PROJECT


SEISMIC STUDY CODE
UBC-1997 vs SNI-03-1726-2002
STORY DRIFT
UBC-1997

CIVIL ENG SECTION


PT PFN

SNI-03-1726-2002

REVAMP PHASE 2 PROJECT


SEISMIC STUDY CODE
UBC-1997 vs SNI-03-1726-2002
ECCENTRICITY
UBC-1997

CIVIL ENG SECTION


PT PFN

SNI-03-1726-2002

REVAMP PHASE 2 PROJECT


SEISMIC STUDY CODE
UBC-1997 vs SNI-03-1726-2002
VERTICAL EARTHQUAKE LOAD
UBC-1997

CIVIL ENG SECTION


PT PFN

SNI-03-1726-2002

REVAMP PHASE 2 PROJECT


SEISMIC STUDY CODE
UBC-1997 vs SNI-03-1726-2002

UBC-1997
ORTHOGONALLY LOAD :
Not Considered
1. Earthquake Load X direction
Ex = 100% Vx
2. Earthquake Load Y direction
Ey = 100% Vy

SNI-03-1726-2002
ORTHOGONALLY LOAD :
1. Earthquake Load X direction
Ex = 100% Vx +30% Vy
2. Earthquake Load Y direction
Ey = 100% +30%

CIVIL ENG SECTION


PT PFN

RISK
Chance BQ
Increase due to
Increasing
Earthquake Load

Our Study BQ Column increase significant


VERTICAL DISTRIBUTION ON TOP LOAD:
Ft = 0.07 T V
Ft = Earthquake Load on Top Structure
V = Total Base Shear
T = Natural Frequency

VERTICAL DISTRIBUTION ON TOP LOAD:


Ft = 0.1 V
Ft = Earthquake Load on Top Structure
V = Total Base Shear

Minor Chance
BQ Increase due
to Increasing
Earthquake Load

FOUNDATION DESIGN
1. Normal Design

FOUNDATION DESIGN
1. Capacity Design
Foundation Loading data shall be multiplied by
factor f ( in revamp phase 2 pj. f = 1.89)
f = Total Extra Strength Factor
2. Inertia Moment Load
Additional Load Fb = 0.1 Ao I Wb
Ao = Peak Acceleration of soil Surface
Wb = Fdn Weight
( in revamp phase 2 pj. Eb = 0.032W)

Chance BQ
Increase due to
Increasing
Earthquake Load

2. No additional Inertia Moment Load

REVAMP PHASE 2 PROJECT


SEISMIC STUDY CODE
UBC-1997 vs SNI-03-1726-2002
ORTHOGONALITY LOAD
UBC-1997
1630 . ..

1633.1. ..

CIVIL ENG SECTION


PT PFN

REVAMP PHASE 2 PROJECT


SEISMIC STUDY CODE
UBC-1997 vs SNI-03-1726-2002
ORTHOGONALITY LOAD
SNI-03-1726-2002

CIVIL ENG SECTION


PT PFN

REVAMP PHASE 2 PROJECT


SEISMIC STUDY CODE
UBC-1997 vs SNI-03-1726-2002
EARTHQUAKE LOAD ON TOP
UBC-1997

CIVIL ENG SECTION


PT PFN

SNI-03-1726-2002

REVAMP PHASE 2 PROJECT


SEISMIC STUDY CODE
UBC-1997 vs SNI-03-1726-2002
FOUNDATION DESIGN
UBC-1997

CIVIL ENG SECTION


PT PFN

REVAMP PHASE 2 PROJECT


SEISMIC STUDY CODE
UBC-1997 vs SNI-03-1726-2002
FOUNDATION DESIGN
SNI-03-1726-2002

CIVIL ENG SECTION


PT PFN

REVAMP PHASE 2 PROJECT


SEISMIC STUDY CODE
UBC-1997 vs SNI-03-1726-2002
Study Case :
Structure Name : 15-E-111E
Type Structure : Concrete (Pre cast)
OMRF
Foundation

: Piles

Dimension

: 3.90 x 9.75 x 12.00

REVAMP PHASE 2 PROJECT


SEISMIC STUDY CODE
UBC-1997 vs SNI-03-1726-2002

REVAMP PHASE 2 PROJECT


SEISMIC STUDY CODE
UBC-1997 vs SNI-03-1726-2002

REVAMP PHASE 2 PROJECT


SEISMIC STUDY CODE
UBC-1997 vs SNI-03-1726-2002

REVAMP PHASE 2 PROJECT


SEISMIC STUDY CODE
UBC-1997 vs SNI-03-1726-2002

REVAMP PHASE 2 PROJECT


SEISMIC STUDY CODE
UBC-1997 vs SNI-03-1726-2002

Thank You
CIVIL ENG SECTION
PT PFN

You might also like