Professional Documents
Culture Documents
No. 11-4657
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle
District of North Carolina, at Greensboro. Thomas D. Schroeder,
District Judge. (1:10-cr-00090-TDS-1)
Submitted:
Decided:
PER CURIAM:
Trae
Javar
Compton
appeals
his
conviction
for
On appeal,
counsel
Anders
for
Compton
filed
brief
pursuant
to
v.
issues
for
appeal
but
questioning
whether
the
asserting
district
that
the
court
lacked
subject
matter
The Government
We affirm.
2005).
The
substantial
jurys
verdict
evidence,
taking
must
be
the
view
sustained
most
if
there
favorable
to
is
the
210, 244 (4th Cir. 2008) (internal quotation marks, brackets and
citations
omitted).
comprehensive
review
of
the
record
We
an
abuse
of
discretion
2
standard.
Gall
v.
United
the
sentence.
Cir.
procedural
and
substantive
reasonableness
of
the
2010).
After
determining
whether
the
district
court
examines
whether
the
court
considered
the
3553(a)
575-76; United States v. Carter, 564 F.3d 325, 330 (4th Cir.
2009).
within-Guidelines
substantively
sentence
reasonable.
was
We
both
procedurally
therefore
affirm
and
Comptons
sentence.
We further find Comptons challenge to the district
courts jurisdiction to be without merit.
United States v.
Baldovinos, 434 F.3d 233, 239 (4th Cir. 2006); United States v.
King, 119 F.3d 290, 295 (4th Cir. 1997).
Pursuant to this courts obligations under Anders, we
have
reviewed
the
meritorious issues.
judgment.
entire
record
in
this
case
and
find
no
writing,
of
the
right
to
petition
the
Supreme
Court
of
the
contentions
the
court
are
adequately
and
argument
presented
would
not
in
aid
the
the
materials
decisional
process.
AFFIRMED