You are on page 1of 5

This article was published in ASHRAE Journal, June 2010.

Copyright 2010 American Society of Heating, Refrigerating and Air-Conditioning


Engineers, Inc. Posted at www.ashrae.org. This article may not be copied and/or distributed electronically or in paper form without permission
of ASHRAE. For more information about ASHRAE Journal, visit
www.ashrae.org.

Large Energy Savings Per Installation

VFDs for Large Chillers


This third column in a five-part series on variable frequency drives will cover application of VFDs to large chillers in commercial
building air-conditioning systems.
By John Dieckmann, Member ASHRAE; Kurtis McKenney; Matthew Guernsey; and James Brodrick, Ph.D.,
Member ASHRAE

sing variable frequency drives (VFDs) for compressor motors in large chillers is a newer application than using VFDs with blowers (discussed in last

months column). VFDs are being used with centrifugal compressors and screw
compressors, the two major compressor categories for large chillers.
Applying a variable speed drive to the
compressor provides energy-efficient
capacity modulation. While the focus of
this series has been on using VFDs for
induction motors, high-speed brushless dc
motors are an important class of motors.
Such motors generally are used to directly
drive high-speed centrifugal compressors.
Large tonnage chillers generally are
capable of capacity modulation, which
enables the chiller to run continuously
while delivering constant-temperature
chilled water as the cooling load varies
from maximum to minimum design load.
The traditional methods of capacity
modulation have been:
For centrifugal compressors, prerotation vanes, also called inlet guide vanes,
reduce capacity while avoiding surge, down
to around 40%. Hot gas bypass (directing
compressor discharge gas to the evaporator)
is used to reduce capacity further.
Screw compressors have been
equipped with slide valves that simultaneously vary the inlet displacement and the
discharge displacement, maintaining a relatively constant built-in volume compression
ratio, typically modulating down to about
30% of full load before hot gas bypass is
needed for further capacity reduction.
Staged operation of multiple compressors (or multiple chillers) has been
58

ASHRAE Journal

used with both types of chillers, as well


as with chillers that use other compressor
types, such as scroll or reciprocating.
Two metrics commonly used to rate the
efficiency of chillers are full-load steady
state performance and the integrated part
load value (IPLV). The IPLV metric is intended to approximate typical seasonal performance as the load on the chiller varies.
Figure 1 shows the air or water temperature entering the condenser versus load that
is used to determine the IPLV for air-cooled
and water-cooled chillers. In each case,
reduced load is assumed to correlate with
lower outdoor wet- and dry-bulb temperature, resulting in lower temperature of the
cooling medium entering the condenser.
The IPLV is a widely accepted metric
for comparing the seasonal average
performance of chillers. However, in
actual applications, chillers operate over
a much wider range of loads and condenser temperatures than the IPLV rating load-condenser temperature curves.
Reasons for operation at low load
percentage and higher condenser temperatures include high ambient wet or
dry-bulb temperature coupled with low
building occupancy or low solar loading
and the general tendency to oversize
building cooling equipment. Reasons
for operation at high load percentage and
ashrae.org

lower condenser temperatures include


high load during chiller start-up after an
unoccupied period and operation of one
of a set of multiple chillers to handle the
building part load.
The combination of chiller plant oversizing and the variation of the factors driving the cooling load (some of which can be
highly variable, namely weather) can result
in almost any combination of chiller load
level and condenser temperature.
Estimates suggest that more than 90%
of water-cooled chiller plant installations include multiple chillers, with
two being the most common number.1
In multiple chiller plants, operation of
any chiller below 50% load is unusual,
with a large percentage of operating time
occurring around the 75% load point or
higher.1
For multiple chiller plants, equipping
each compressor with VFD may provide
the greatest energy savings and/or operational flexibility, but it may be more economical (or at least less capital intensive)
to apply VFD to the base load chillers or
chillers expected to operate at part-load
(swing chillers). Chillers that operate
the most hours with reduced condenser
water temperatures (i.e., reduced lift) and/
or reduced load will offer the greatest
energy cost savings potential.
Several factors account for the improvement in the IPLV provided by variable
speed drives. Variable speed operation
significantly reduces, if not eliminates
altogether, the use of hot gas bypass for
continuous operation at low load. In centrifugal chillers, variable speed combined
with prerotation vanes enables operation

June 2010

Advertisement formerly in this space.

Temperature Entering Condenser

100F
90F
80F
70F

Water-Cooled

60F

Air-Cooled

50F
IPLV Weighting: 12%

40F
0%

45%

25%

50%
Load

42%

75%

1%

100%

Figure 1: Temperature of cooling air or water entering the condenser


versus load and weighting factors for IPLV determination.

Advertisement formerly in this space.

closer to maximum compressor efficiency across a wide range


of operating conditions. With screw compressors, it is possible
to eliminate the slide valve, using speed variation to cover the
full operating range at higher efficiency.
There are many variables involved in determining seasonal
energy performance. However, based on informal conversations with industry engineers, the typical energy savings over
a cooling season provided by applying a VFD to a chiller is
approximately 25%.2 Additional benefits include improved
power factor and soft starting of the chiller motor, reducing
both impulse loading on the motor and large in-rush currents.
Energy Saving Potential

Space cooling in U.S. commercial buildings consumed 2.3


quadrillion Btus (quads) of primary electric energy in 2006.
Of this, an estimated 0.3 quads are attributable to centrifugal
and screw chillers in commercial and institutional buildings.
If we assume, for the sake of simplicity, that VFDs are not
widely implemented in large chillers, and that VFDs result in 25%
average energy savings over conventional single-speed chillers,
then VFD offers a technical energy savings potential for large
chillers of approximately 0.1 quads. However, one manufacturer
claims that VFDs are more prevalent now, indicating that 80% of
centrifugal chillers with a VFD option available ship with a VFD.2
This is a relatively low national energy savings potential
relative to other VFD applications. However, the number of
buildings with central chiller plants is only on the order of
100,000,4 indicating there is a large amount of energy savings
potential per installation. In large commercial buildings, the
central chiller plant is often one of the main energy end uses,
and therefore 25% savings on the chiller energy can represent
a significant reduction in the buildings overall operating costs.
The 25% savings should not be assumed for any given application. For the reasons mentioned, the actual energy savings from using VFDs in chillers will vary widely from one
installation to the next. Some applications with significant
off-design operation may see energy reductions greater than
60

ASHRAE Journal

June 2010

Advertisement formerly in this space.

35%, while applications with multiple


chillers operating near design conditions, may experience energy savings
of less than 15%.2
Energy savings estimates for a single
installation should rely on locationspecific factors, particularly weather.

Chiller energy savings should only


be modeled with respect to total chiller
plant energy savings, which would also
consider plant ancillary equipment. In
a typical water-cooled chiller plant, the
chiller accounts for approximately 85% of
the system energy.5

Market Factors

Variable speed drives can offer significant energy savings when applied to the
right chiller applications. Also, chillers
with VFDs can exhibit improved reliability
and life as a result of an improved power
factor and soft starting of the chiller motor.
However, real energy savings tend to be
application-specific. VFDs can give the
perception of energy savings when the IPLV
formula is applied, particularly in buildings
with multiple chillers, which is generally
the case.1 High-load operating points are
noticeably more important than the IPLV
metric may indicate.1 Therefore, a more
involved modeling process is necessary to
determine the cost effectiveness of installing one or more VFDs in a chiller plant.
The cost of VFD technology has dropped
substantially over the past 30 years, and in
many new designs, VFD technology is
included in the base-unit design.2 Several
geographic regions offer rebates for the
application of VFD technology.2
References
1. Geister, R. and M. Thompson. 2009. A
closer look at chiller ratings. ASHRAE Journal
51(12):2232.
2. Communication with Johnson Controls.
3. Energy Eff iciency and Renewable
Energy. 2010. 2009 Buildings Energy Data
Book. U.S. Department of Energy. http://
buildingsdatabook.eere.energy.gov/.
4. EIA. 2003. Commercial Building Energy Consumption Survey, Table B40. Energy
Information Administration, U.S. Department
of Energy. http://tinyurl.com/CBECS2003.
5. Furlong, J. and F. Morrison. Optimization of water-cooled chillercooling tower
combinations, CTI Journal 26(1):1219.
http://tinyurl.com/CTIFurlong.
6. AHRI Standard 550/590-2003, 2003 Standard for Performance Rating of Water-Chilling
Packages Using the Vapor Compression Cycle.
7. 2008 ASHRAE HandbookHVAC Systems
and Equipment. Chapter 44, Motors, Motor
Controls, and Variable-Speed Drives.

Advertisement formerly in this space.

John Dieckmann is a director, Kurtis


McKenney is an associate principal, and
Matthew Guernsey is a senior technologist in the Mechanical Systems Group of
TIAX LLC, Cambridge, Mass. James
Brodrick, Ph.D., is a project manager with
the Building Technologies Program, U.S.
Department of Energy, Washington, D.C.
62

ASHRAE Journal

June 2010

You might also like