Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Physica E
journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/physe
H I G H L I G H T S
Solgel spin coating technique was used to fabricate undoped and Cu doped NiO lms.
The optical band gap value of the NiO lms was decreased with increase in Cu doping level.
The optimum Cu dopant content for NiO is 0.2% for the improved photoresponse characteristics of the diode.
The transient current measurement indicated that the lms could be used as a photosensor.
art ic l e i nf o
a b s t r a c t
Article history:
Received 12 July 2013
Received in revised form
10 September 2013
Accepted 27 September 2013
Available online 12 October 2013
Solgel spin coating technique was used to fabricate undoped and Cu doped NiO lms. The effects of Cu
doping on the optical properties of NiO lms were investigated. The optical band gap value of the NiO
lms was decreased with increase in Cu doping level. The band gap values for 0.1 at%, 0.2 at%, 1.0 at%, and
2.0 at% Cu doped NiO lms were 3.74 eV, 3.69 eV, 3.68 eV, and 3.67 eV, respectively. The junction and
photoconducting properties of the Al/CuNiO/p-Si/Al device were studied that Ion/Ioff value of the Al/Cu
NiO/p-Si/Al device rstly increases with increase in Cu doping level up to 0.2% of Cu and then decreases
with further increase in the Cu doping level. The transient photocurrent measurement indicated that
photocurrent under illumination was higher than the dark current and transient photocurrent increases
with increase in light intensity. The CV characteristics of the diode were also investigated at different
frequencies. The observed behavior of the diodes was explained on the basis of the interface states.
& 2013 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
Keywords:
NiO
Cu doped NiO
Band gap
Schottky diode
Solgel
1. Introduction
Nickel oxide (NiO) is a transition metal oxide having with a
wide band gap in the range from 3.6 to 4.0 eV [1]. NiO is a p-type
of semiconductor and is a promising candidature for many
applications such as lithium ion batteries [2], solar cells [3],
antiferromagentic layer [4], electrochemical capacitors [5], chemical sensors [6], and electrochromic coatings [7]. Stoichiometric
NiO at room temperature is an insulator with a resistivity of
n
Corresponding authors.
E-mail addresses: ramguptamsu@gmail.com (R.K. Gupta),
fyhanoglu@rat.edu.tr (F. Yakuphanoglu).
1
Tel.: 1 6202354763
1386-9477/$ - see front matter & 2013 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.physe.2013.09.014
1013 cm [8]. The electrical conductivity of NiO can be manipulated by changing the concentration of Ni ion during doping. Guo
et al. [9] have studied the effect of Li ion doping on the electrical
properties of NiO lm. It was observed that the resistivity
decreased to 1.33 k cm at 0.11 mol%, which was one order of
magnitude lower than that of the undoped NiO lm.
Thin lms of NiO were prepared by physical and chemical
deposition techniques, such as, DC and RF sputtering [10,11],
pulsed laser deposition [12], electrochemical deposition [13],
chemical vapor deposition [14], solgel [15], and spray pyrolysis
[16]. Among these techniques, solgel method has many advantages such as low temperature processing, low cost, and easy
technology [17]. Zhao et al. [12] have studied the effects of Cu
content on the morphology, structure, optical and electrochromic
2. Experimental details
NiO and Cu doped NiO thin lms were fabricated using solgel
spin coating method. The required chemicals for the synthesis
were of analytical grade and used without further purication.
Nickel acetate, copper acetate, 2-metoxyethanol, and ethanolamine were used for fabrication of the lms. In typical synthesis,
0.5 M of nickel acetate was slowly dissolved in 2-metoxyethanol
followed by addition of ethanolamine. The molar ratio of ethanolamine to nickel acetate was 1.0. For copper doped NiO, the
required amount of copper acetate in atomic percentages (at)
was added in the above mixture to get 0.1 at%, 0.2 at%, 1.0 at% and
2.0 at% of copper doped NiO. The prepared mixtures were stirred
using a magnetic stirrer at 60 1C for 30 min to obtain clear
homogeneous solution and then sol was kept for aging for 20 h
prior to lm deposition. The pure and copper doped NiO lms
were deposited on microscopy glasses for optical studies by sol
gel spin coating method and followed by heating at 150 1C for
10 min to evaporate the solvent and remove organic residuals. The
prepared undoped and copper doped NiO lms were annealed at
400 1C for 1 h in a furnace.
Prior to fabrication of the Schottky diode, the substrate (p-type
crystalline silicon wafer with 600 m in thickness, 510 cm
resistivity, and 1 1 1 orientation) was chemically etched by the
solution of HF for 1 min and then rinsed in re-distilled water using
an ultrasonic bath for 1015 min. Aluminum (Al) ohmic contact
was evaporated on back side of silicon by thermal evaporation
followed by a thermal treatment at 570 1C for 5 in N2 atmosphere.
The lm was deposited onto the front side of silicon wafer by spin
coating with a rotating speed of 2000 rpm for 20 s. After each
coating, the deposited sol was dried at 150 1C for 10 min to obtain
solid lm. The coating procedure was repeated for 5 times. After
coating of the lms, a circular top contact (contact area 3.14 cm2)
was made by evaporating aluminum using physical mask.
Surface morphology was investigated using a PARK system XE
100E atomic force microscopy (AFM). The transmittance and
absorbance properties of the lms were taken using a Shimadzu
UVvis-NIR 3600 spectrophotometer. The electrical characterization of the diode was done using 4200 Keithley semiconductor
characterization system. Photovoltaic measurements were
executed using a 200 W halogen lamp. The light intensity of the
halogen lamp was measured using a solar power meter (TM-206).
The transient photoconductivity measurements were performed
using Keithley 6517 A electrometer.
289
290
Fig. 1. AFM images of undoped NiO (a), 0.1% Cu doped NiO (b), 0.2% Cu doped NiO (c), 1.0% Cu doped NiO (d), and 2% Cu doped NiO (e) lms.
291
Fig. 2. Transmittance vs. wavelength (a), absorbance vs. wavelength (b), and (h) vs. h plots (c) for undoped NiO and Cu doped NiO lms.
Fig. 3. IV characteristics of (a) Al/NiOp-Si/Al and (b) Al/0.2% CuNiOp-Si/Al diode under dark and light of various intensities.
that the diode exhibit a non-linear behavior. The higher value of the
ideality factor shows the presence of inhomogenities of Schottky
barrier height and existence of interface states, oxide layer on silicon
wafer and series resistance [28]. The IV characteristics of the Cu
doped NiO devices show very similar characteristics to the undoped
NiO based diode. Fig. 3b shows the IV characteristics of Al/0.2%Cu
NiO/p-Si/Al as a representative plot.
As seen in Fig. 3, the IV characteristics of the device show that
the reverse current increases with increasing light illumination
intensity. Fig. 4 shows the variation of photocurrent with light
intensity for Al/NiO/p-Si/Al as a representative plot. All the other
devices having different Cu doping level show similar nature.
292
Fig. 4. Variation of Iph with light intensity (P) for Al/NiO/p-Si/Al diode.
of log(Iph) vs. log(P) plot and was found to be 0.52. The obtained m
value between 0.5 and 1 suggests the presence of continuous
distribution of trap levels [30]. To better understand the effect of
Cu doping on the diode characteristics of the devices, the transient
photocurrent measurements of the diode were performed under
various light intensities. Fig. 5a and b shows the transient photocurrent measurements of Al/NiO/p-Si/Al and Al/0.2% CuNiO/p-Si/Al
device. As evident from these gures, the photocurrent of the diodes
increases after illuminating the device and return to initial value of
current after turning off the illumination. The initial rise in the
current indicates more generation of free charge carriers on illuminating the device. The decay of the photocurrent after turning off the
illumination is due to trapping of the charge carriers in the deep
levels. Clearly, this suggests that the fabricated devices exhibit a
photoconducting behavior and could be used as photo-sensor. Fig. 5c
shows the variation of Ion/Ioff of the Al/Cu-NiO/p-Si/Al device vs. Cu
doping level in NiO. As seen in the gure, the Ion/Ioff of the Al/Cu-NiO/
p-Si/Al device rstly increases with increase in Cu doping level up
to 0.2 at% of Cu and then decreases with further increase in the
Cu doping level. These results indicate that the optimum Cu dopant
content for NiO is 0.2% for the improved photoresponse characteristics.
The capacitance of the devices as a function of voltage and
frequency were studied to further characterize the junction properties. Fig. 6 shows the forward and reverse bias CV characteristics
of the Al/NiO/p-Si/Al and Al/0.2%CuNiO/p-Si/Al diode at various
frequencies. As seen in Fig. 6, in general, the capacitance of the diode
Fig. 5. Transient current for (a) Al/NiOp-Si/Al diode and (b) Al/0.2%CuNiOp-Si/Al diode (c) Variation of Ion/Ioff of the Al/CuNiO/p-Si/Al device vs. Cu doping level (dotted
line is guide to eyes).
293
Fig. 6. CV characteristics of (a) Al/NiOp-Si/Al and (b) Al/0.2% CuNiOp-Si/Al diode under different frequencies.
Fig. 7. GV characteristics of (a) Al/NiOp-Si/Al and (b) Al/0.2% CuNiOp-Si/Al diode under different frequencies.
GADJ
G2m C m 2 C m
a2 C m 2
G2m C m 2 a
a2 C m 2
where
a Gm G2m C m 2 RS
Gm =C m 2
1 Gm =C m 2
Gm
294
Fig. 8. CADJV characteristics of (a) Al/NiOp-Si/Al and (b) Al/0.2% CuNiOp-Si/Al diode under different frequencies.
Fig. 9. GADJV characteristics of (a) Al/NiOp-Si/Al and (b) Al/0.2% CuNiOp-Si/Al diode under different frequencies.
Fig. 10. RSV characteristics of (a) Al/NiOp-Si/Al and (b) Al/0.2% CuNiOp-Si/Al diode under different frequencies.
4. Conclusions
Undoped and Cu doped NiO lms were deposited using solgel
spin coating method. Atomic force microscopy images conrm the
smoothness of the lms. The optical study showed that the band
gap of the NiO increased after Cu doping. The junction properties
295
Fig. 11. DitF characteristics of (a) Al/NiOp-Si/Al and (b) Al/0.2% CuNiOp-Si/Al diode under different frequencies.
H. Sato, T. Minami, S. Takata, T. Yamada, Thin Solid Films 236 (1993) 27.
T. Li, S. Ni, X. Lv, X. Yang, S. Duan, J. Alloys Compd. 553 (2013) 167.
J Bandara, H Weerasinghe, Sol. Energy Mater. Sol. Cells 85 (2005) 385.
S.S. Nkosi, B. Yalisi, D.E. Motaung, J. Keartland, E. Sideras-Haddad, A. Forbes,
B.W. Mwakikunga, Appl. Surf. Sci. 265 (2013) 860.
F. Zhang, Y. Zhou, H. Li, Mater. Chem. Phys. 83 (2004) 260.
Y. Du, W.N. Wang, X.W. Li, J. Zhao, J.M. Ma, Y.P. Liu, Mater. Lett. 68 (2012) 168.
K.K. Purushothaman, G. Muralidharan, Sol. Energy Mater. Sol. Cells 93 (2009)
1195.
W.L. Jang, Y.M. Lu, W.S. Hwang, W.C. Chen, J. Eur. Ceram. Soc. 30 (2010) 503.
Wen Guo, K.N. Hui, K.S. Hui, Mater. Lett. 92 (2013) 291.
J. Kim, H. Na, S. Lee, Y.H. Sung, J.H. Yoo, D.S. Lee, D.H. Ko, H. Sohn, Curr. Appl.
Phys. 11 (2011) e70.
[11] S. Nandy, S. Goswami, K.K. Chattopadhyay, Appl. Surf. Sci. 256 (2010) 3142.
[12] R.K. Gupta, K. Ghosh, P.K. Kahol, Physica E 41 (2009) 617.
[13] L. Zhao, G. Su, W. Liu, L. Cao, J. Wang, Z. Dong, M. Song, Appl. Surf. Sci. 257
(2011) 3974.
[14] H. Wang, G. Wu, X.P. Cai, Y. Zhao, Z.F. Shi, J. Wang, X.C. Xia, X. Dong, B.L. Zhang,
Y. Ma, G.T. Du, Vacuum 86 (2012) 2044.
[15] A.A. Al-Ghamdi, W.E. Mahmoud, S.J. Yaghmour, F.M. Al-Marzouki, J. Alloys
Compd. 486 (2009) 9.
[16] I.A. Garduno, J.C. Alonso, M. Bizarro, R. Ortega, L Rodrguez-Fernandez, A. Ortiz,
J. Cryst. Growth 312 (2010) 3276.
[17] F. Yakuphanoglu, J. Alloys Compd. 507 (2010) 184.
[18] X. Wu, T.J. Coutts, W.P. Mulligan, J. Vac. Sci. Technol., A 15 (1997) 1057.
[19] J.C. Manifacier, M. De Murcia, J.P. Fillard, E. Vicario, Thin Solid Films 41 (1977)
127.
[20] V.R. Shinde, T.P. Gujar, C.D. Lokhande, R.S. Mane, S.H. Han, Mater. Chem. Phys.
96 (2006) 326.
[21] J.S. Cruz, G.T. Delgado, R.C. Perez, C.I.Z. Romero, O.Z. Angel, Thin Solid Films
515 (2007) 5381.
[22] N.S. Das, B. Saha, R. Thapa, G.C. Das, K.K. Chattopadhyay, Physica E 42 (2010)
1377.
[23] Wenjuan Yu, Liang Shen, Shengping Ruan, Fanxu Meng, Jialue Wang,
Enrui Zhang, Weiyou Chen, Sol. Energy Mater. Sol. Cells 98 (2012) 212.
[24] J.M. Nel, F.D. Auret, L. Wu, M.J. Legodi, W.E. Meyer, M. Hayes, Sens. Actuators, B
100 (2004) 270.
[25] S.M. Sze, Physics of Semiconductor Devices, Wiley, New York,, 1979.
[26] R.K. Gupta, R.A. Singh, Mater. Chem. Phys. 86 (2004) 279.
[27] S. Karatas, A. Turut, Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res., Sect. A 566 (2006) 584.
[28] F. Yakuphanoglu, Y. Caglar, M. Caglar, S. Ilican, Mater. Sci. Semicond. Proc. 13
(2010) 137.
[29] S Kazim, V. Alia, M Zulfequar, M. MazharulHaq, M. Husain, Physica B 393
(2007) 310.
[30] F. Yakuphanoglu, B.F. Senkal, Synth. Met. 159 (2009) 311.
[31] F. Yakuphanoglu, S. Okur, Microelectron. Eng. 87 (2010) 30.
[32] E.H. Nicollian, A. Goetzberger, Bell Syst. Technol. J. 46 (1967) 1055.
[33] I. Dokme, S. Altindal, T. Tunc, I. Uslu, Microelectron. Reliab. 50 (2010) 39.
[34] S. Karatas, A. Turut, Vacuum 74 (2004) 45.
[35] W.A. Hill, C.C. Coleman, Solid State Electron. 23 (1980) 987.