uuohECElVEL)

ffi*^,,,i92016
A,LIO?9

?ili6

FORM 32
(RULE B-1 (4))

;LJ'

'5
..qllI,f
t 'I'rt f,..,t
. ,-:ri . ::r;',. i i. " tn*;A..
g:: :'
:. .i,,, j ;l",t::
,"

;{i

dt.

IJa. t:. i

s-165441j"' :lltf

'N-6.'

Vancouver Registry

ln the Supreme Court of British Columbia

$ERVICE OF A TRUE COPY

HEREoF ADMtErrD,fr

Between
Darcy Delainey, Wonser De-Gbon

AUG 2
and
His Worship the Mayor Gregor Robertson

I 2016

WILLIAM F. PENTNEY /
Solicbofdodant(s)
A.G.C.

J}T

CIryOF VANCOUVER
Risk Management
NOTICE OF APPLICATION
AUG

His Worship

20t6

ffiEMM

Name(s) of applicant{s):

To:

21

the Mayor Gregor Robertson

TAKE NOTICE that an application will be made by the applicant(s) to the presiding judge or master at the

courthouse

at

800 Smithe Street, Vancouver, British Columbia

forthe order(s)

set out in Part

I below.

g.'#o,-,
Part 1: ORDER(S)SOUGHT
fiJsing numbered parographs, set out the order(s) that will be sought at the application and indicate agoinst which
party(ies) the order(s) is(are) sought.l

We seek to proceed civilly with our complaint that as Electoral District Officers of the Marijuana Party [of
Canadal that we are all protected as being private individuals, who should be respected as equals in order
to get a fair treatment in this civil proceeding, as being equals before and under the law [Sec 15 - Charter of
Rights and Freedoms. FURTHERMORE: Our Sec I Charter rights are being trampled because we are being
denied common law rights as prescribed by law -[R v Therens], in a free and democratic society -[R v Oakes].
It's self evident that the legal department for the Mayor would like to ignore these facts, as somehow no

longerbindingundertheirMaritimejurisdictionand/ortheirauthoritytoregulate. Theycannotcontinue
to ignore this R v Smith /SCC ruling, where under positive law, we are obligated to protect our RUBRIC.
Somehow, the City and the CDSA have given themselves the right to hold the authority to obstruct our

26August201

Page 1

of4

guarantee to stand under the fact that with this R v Smith ruling we can fulfill our RUBRIC, in order to
protect the public trust, which is being subverted by this opposite and arbitrary Maritime definition of
protecting Public Safety [under NATO treaty obligations like TPP, NAFTA etc..]

This right to equality is being subverted by acting under an erroneous colour of right [under Sec 59 CC
SEDITIONI to conspire by advocating the use, without the authority of law, of force, as a means of
accomplishing a governmentalchange by insisting on challenging a given in Law NAMELY: [under Sec279
(1) TRAFFICKING lN PERSONSI They hold no authority to control our common law movements.

2 This court ruling needs to

address the fact that the lawyer for Jody Wilson Raybould is introducing a civil

petition ruling against Marc Boyer, by the BC Law Society. The City keeps calling trying to construe an
argument that Marc Boyer is being paid, or is acting like a lawyer. We keep insisting that he is not our
lawyer, and we have never paid him any remuneration of any sort. He is a rron-signing officer in our
Electoral District [EDA], and his position is as an electoral campaign agent. His activities in this case fall

withinthisentitlement. lnthiscaseheisactingasafriendofthecourt,andwewill

alsobebringingMicah

Green [who is CFA for VKMP] as a friend of the coutt.

It should be noted that Marc Boyer's political defenses have caused 2 CEOs of Election Canada to resign
over his political issues, and frankly this Justice Bennette case that Mr Khan calls relevant actually caused
Marc Mayrand to resign. Apparently the Crown and the City are relying on belng classified as an OPCA for
his faith /religious beliefs, as being the reason for punishing /convicting him lwhich actually caused these
CEOs to resign, because these Provincial Court rulings are challenging the very integrity of His Office.
Our EDA is totally autonomous from Marc Boyer personal positions [and to show this, our dispensary has
never bought any cookies from his remarcablefoods bakery, because we have an EDA /dispensary policy of
no cookies since openingl Marc Boyer, has been important in writing these articles, but he is pressing our
EDA's position, by deliberately not making any OPCA /religious claims in our court filings, because the
courts at face value hold prejudice toward any OPCA victim of Justice.
ln the regard to suing a representative, we identify Mr lain Dixon, as being liable for pressing this second
file 5-166352 as being applicable, except for the faqt that under the Elections Act, an EDA cannot sue,
or be sued [monetarilyl; so we are not insisting on a payment for filing this case, as long as it's dismissed.
case

Part 2: FACTUAL BASIS

lUsing numbered paragraphs, set out a brief summary of the facts supporting the altplicotion.)

ln regard to our Sec 1 Charter of Rights defense: We will adhere to our position held in our original notice of
civil claim, filed on May 27th,2016.

ln regard to our claim of being victimized by what these courts call frivolous and vexatious litigants, who
are apparently motivated by fear of losing Federal funding for anything that occurs when they don't

support this conspiracy to destroy the Elections Act itself. lt's actually called Treason to succeed, but in the
meantime Sedition is sufficient a cause to have this file S-166352 be struck down,

|f

any party sues or is sued in a representative capacity, identify the party and describe the representative capacity.)

Part 3: LEGAL BASIS

[Using numbered paragraphs, specify any rule or other enactment relied on and provide s brief summary of any other
legal arguments on which the applicant(s) intend(s) to rely in support of the orders sought.l

THE Clry OF VANCOUVER has had no Registrar since last year. No respectful Registrar would have
permitted Mr. Dixon to proceed with this second claim. The issue is basic, we seek to be treated as equals,
under Sec 15 of the Charter, and that means the City cannot trash our right to protect our political beliefs,
when the motive behind this is that they consider these beliefs wrong or false.

26August201

Page 2

of4

political positions are fully supported under our positive law interpretation of R v Smith /SCC
ruling of 2015-06-11. It's self evident that no one in Maritime Authority respects this decision and frankly
this general policy is actually called a seditious conspiracy to undermine and accomplish a governmental
ON THIS: Our

change within Canada.

Part 4: MATERIAL TO BE RELIED ON

llJsing numbered paragrophs, list the affidavits served with the notice of application and any other affidavits and
other documents already in the court file on which the applicant(s) will rely. Each affidavit included on the list must
be identified as follows:

'Affidavit #...[sequential number,if ony,recordedinthetoprighthandcornerof theaffidavit].....of

e ........1d d/ m m m/yyyy]........".

[n a m e)..............., m ad

.........

of t2,- ,-"
i,

The applicanttsl estimate(r

Do: /u-,:,

-,ug,

^ude

rn

nou,,

August 22,20106
minutes

[Check the correct box.]

f]
ffi

This matter is within the jurisdiction of the master.

This matter is not within the jurisdiction of a master.

you wish to respond to this notice of application,

you must, within 5 business days after service of this notice of application or, if this application is brought under
Rule 9-7, within 8 business days after service of this notice of application,
TO THE PERSONS RECEIVING THIS NOTICE OF APPLICATION: lf

(a)

file an application response in Form 33,

(b) file the original of every affidavit, and of every other document, that
(i)

you intend to refer to at the hearing of this application, and

(ii) has not already been filed in the proceeding, and

(c) serve on

the applicant 2 copies of the following, and on every other party of record one copy of the

following:
(i) a copy of the

filed application response;

(ii) a copy of each of the filed affidavits and other documents that you intend to refer to at the hearing
this application and that has not already been served on that person;

of

(iii) if this application is brought under Rule 9-7, any notice that you are required to give under
Rule 9-7

(9).

-.."''"^-

" ''

Date:

ffi

Applicant

Lawyer for applicant(s)

Darcy Delainey

26August201

Page 3

of4

OTHER FILES PRESSED lN THIS CIVIL

CLAIM

case file no:

S-1 65441

TAKE NOTE - We filed this Civil Claim on June 14,2016 - We are establishing new case
precedent to legalize the common law activity of selling marijuana under Sec 1 of the Charter
and this new law Sec 279(1) CC - Please discern this court filing carefully. lt's a very detailed
1O-page Civil Claim that is actually the precedent setting case, where [with this victory] any
EDA can be repeat this anywhere in Canada, in order to legalize medical marijuana NOW.
https ://www. scri bd. com/d ocu m e nU3 1 5762

34A/G M P-B C-C ivi l-C la im -fi le-S-

544

We finally can post on our VGMP civil case, [it's not in private chambers]
This NOTICE TO PROCEED [form 44] * is where we're setting precedent to legalize cannabis
sales and cultivation [under common law jurisdiction] under our R v Smith /SCC ruling
https //www. scri bd. com/d ocu ment/32 1 98987 1 A/G M P-Posti n g-AU G22 [it's only 2-pages] Be inspired and register a local EDA Office [Electoral DistrictAssociation].
.

This Facebook /posted video is a very good explanation on our EDA [political] legal position
layman's terms - https://www.facebook.com/remarcablefoods/videos/10153734086452596/

in

This Facebook /posted video was done before we filed this civil claim
https //www. faceboo k. com/rem a rca b lefood s/vid eos/1 0 1 5 3667342 797596/
it explains Sec 279 (1) CC Trafficking in Persons in practice.
:

Go to Facebook on the following pages to see what Marc Boyer's other interests are.
MAIN PAGE: https://www.facebook.com/remarcablefoods

Marijuana Party https.//www.facebook.comA/OTE-MarUuana-Par1y-in-Canada-1483299i

Occ

py Wo rl d https ://www. facebook. com/occu

py. wo rld. va

85304397/

n/

Magna Carta https://www facebook.com/Magna-Carta-Rallies-Festivals-10380778228768S5/

Peace on Earth https://www.facebook.com/Peace-on-Earth-289513931424763/?fref=ts
rem a rca

lefoods

https //www. facebook. com/Rem

:

a rca b

lefood s 1 /?f ref=ts

Our Living Water Co-op https://www.facebook.com/OurlivingWater/

CONTACT INFO: Marc Boyer as GFA for the following EDAs - Vancouver Quadra,
Vancouver East - Vancouver South - West Vancouver, Sunshine Coast, Sea to Sky Country

PHONE: 778-707-7461 EMAIL:

Marijuana Party
Party

Leader:

increationwetrust@qmail.com

[of Canada] - website http.//www.marUuanaparty.calindex.en.php3

Blair
contact 514-725-8103 info@marijuanapartv.ca

Longley