Professional Documents
Culture Documents
M42 MOUNT SPIRAL: Carl Zeiss Jena BIOMETAR 80mm F2.8, M42 / P6 (Pentacon-six) mount
2011
Tessar T * CZ 2.8 / 45 (Y / C)
Carl Meyer SPEED 1.9 / 50 (DKL)
MC Chinon 1.7 / 50 (M42)
Tokyo Kogaku RE Topcor 1.4 / 50
CZ Planar 1.4 / 50 (Y / C)
CZJ Prakticar 1.4 / 50 (PB)
Planar 1.8 Rollei / 50 (QBM)
Lomo * / Kmz PO33M 2/50
Voigtlander Ultragon 5.5 / 60
(6x9cm)
Lomo OKC6751 2/75
Elcan 2/75 Leitz (6X6 Or 6X7cm)
Beyreuth Steiner 3.5 / 75 (6X4.5Cm)
Tokyo Kogaku RE Topcor 1.8 / 85
ROMZ CyclopM1 1.2 / 85 (M42)
Westanar 2.8 Isco / 85 (M42)
CZ Planar T * 1.4 / 85 ZF.2 (Nik F)
Apochromat 2/100 Kinoptik (Apla)
KOMZ Uran27 2.5 / 100 (7X8cm)
Rodenstock Rotelar 4/100 (Exakta)
Ernemann Ernostar 2/100 (revised
M42) * *
CZJ Triplet 2.8 / 100
R & J Beck Isostigmar 5.8 / 120 (3x4
")
Meyer DoppelPlasmat 4/120 (btw
6x9 and 4x5)
Picon 2.8 Pieskar / 135 (M42)
Aldis Uno Anastigmat 7.7 / 155 (3X4
")
Rodenstock Imagon 5.8 / 200 (3X4")
CONTAFLEX pro Tessar
Protessar 35mm F3.2
Tessar 50mm F2.8
Protessar 85mm F3.2
Protessar 115mm F4
5/27/2016
M42 MOUNT SPIRAL: Carl Zeiss Jena BIOMETAR 80mm F2.8, M42 / P6 (Pentacon-six) mount
(3x4 ")
Dallmeyer Dalmac
Astro movie lens
Astro GaussTachar 2/32 (Arri)
Astro Macro GaussTachar 2/40 *
Astro Roscher Kino Portrait 2.3 / 75
*
Toronie Makyo of
Nokton 1.5 Voigtlander / 50 (Prom) *
*
Voigtlander Ultron 2/50 (Prom)
reentry (fullsize machine)
CZJ Flektogon 4/20 * *
Rodenstock Eurygon 2.8 / 30
CZJ Flektogon 2.4,2.8 / 35
Rodenstock Heligon 1.9 / 50
CZ Ultron 1.8 / 50
Leitz SummicronR 2/50
Search this blog
Search
Selfintroduction
spiral
Yokohama City,
Kanagawa Prefecture,
Japan
Gauss from the left lens (Biotar) / Biometar / topogon type optical element of
(Topogon)
The first time Biometar the former East German people's communes Carl Zeiss
Jena had been produced from 1950 to 1981 is. In the German Read Biometaru, in
English and Biometa. This brand is focused as the main products of middle
aperture lens the company, a wideangle of 35mm, mediumtelephoto 80mm, a
telephoto of 120mm and three models were produced. Among them Biometar of
focal length 80mm is most often produced as a prime lens of medium format
photography, it has recorded a long seller over for more than 30 years. Was to
design a lens is Harry has been moved from Voigtlander company in 1946 Zllner
is (Harry Zollner) Dr. (19122008) [PatentUS2968221]. Zllner Dr. with the
person who designed the Skopar to Voigtlander era, after the move to Zeiss Jena
also worked on popular brands such as Flektogon series and Pancloar series, it is
one of the name of the designer who supported the postwar East German Zeiss
Jena. Retired in 1965, he died in Jena in 2008. We have to fulfill the longevity.
The optical system of the Biometar 80mmF2.8 / Xenotar 80mmF2.8 / Unilite 50mm F2 from the left.
Lens design philosophy is reflected in the thickness of the rear group of concave meniscus lens
(elements colored in red)
5/27/2016
M42 MOUNT SPIRAL: Carl Zeiss Jena BIOMETAR 80mm F2.8, M42 / P6 (Pentacon-six) mount
By adjusting the thickness of the disposed concave lens in the rear group, it is
possible to control the specific gravity of the nature of the nature and Topogon
type lens of Gauss type lens. If Maze the thickness of the concave lens, correction
effect of resolution and chromatic aberration of the image center strengthened
the dominant feature of Gauss lens is improved, so that a large diameter can be
easily realized. Typically in the UK Wray (Ray) company of this type of lens is
there is a brand Unilite (Yuniraito), which was launched in 1944, it was to achieve
a relatively large diameter to cut the F2. Conversely strengthened the dominant
feature of Topogon lens Reducing the thickness, it is possible to enhance the
effect of correcting the distortion aberration and astigmatism. Since Although
aperture ratio is somewhat conservative improving the view angle characteristics
(resolution of the peripheral portion), a wideangle lens or enlargement lens, the
lens design that achieves high homogeneity is facilitated. Biometar and
Schneider's Xenotar of Carl Zeiss Jena is a representative of this type of lens
design. While Unilite type there is also a literature that is equated with Biometar /
Xenotar type and lumped together, design philosophy of Unilite type lens that put
the weight on the larger diameter than the angle of view characteristics are
completely different, both Similar one in which nonmade ( "lens all of the design"
reference Author Sadahiko Tsuji).
2011 (19)
Biometar is a long seller, which was also produced 31 years from 1950 and 1981.
According to the East German ZEISS of production ledger, a prototype with a
variety of mount standard from 1949 (prototype) it has been made. In its first
issue in August 1949, production number is this 3. Focal length 80 mm, the open
aperture value was F2.8. In addition, in February 1950 of the next year is the
second issue of the prototype model has appeared six in the specifications of the
90mm F2.8. Whether the focal length is why only two kinds of lens different only
10mm prototype, is not an obvious truth though, it is carried out comparative
study of both products of 80mm and 90mm during the summer, and finally 80mm
F2. 8 was to be commercialized. This model appeared in 1950 autumn, first
product to cover the medium format of 6x6cm has been supplied for the
Rolleiflex. In 1952 for the M42 mounting and Exakta mount of 35mm format,
which was slightly smaller optical system it has appeared. In parallel with this East
German Zeiss has launched a focal length 35mm Biometar 2.8 / 35 (35mm format)
from January 1950. This wideangle Biometar has suddenly appeared without any
performance testing with a prototype, in fact, in the postwar type Contax IIa /
IIIa that both East and West Zeiss has been jointly developed, in order to respond
to the emergency situation that can not use the prewar Biogon 3.5cmF2.8 It was
of the product. However, it is immediately West German ZEISS is reduced demand
by that was to appear after the war type Zeiss Biogon 35mm F2.8, a discontinued
at that manufactured the only 1614 present. On the other hand, East German
Zeiss had already prepared a successor product of wideangle Biometar
alternative to this. Biometar developed a retro focus of the new wideangle lens,
which was adapted to the singlelens reflex camera, which debuted in 1952 in the
name of Flektogon (Furekutogon).
Blog Archive
2016 (9)
2015 (33)
2014 (20)
2013 (22)
2012 (16)
12 January (1)
Carl Zeiss Jena BIOMETAR
80mm F2.8, M42 / P6
(Pentaco ...
11 May (2)
10 May (1)
9 May (2)
8 May (2)
7 May (2)
6 May (2)
5 May (2)
4 May (1)
March (1)
2 May (1)
1 May (2)
2010 (31)
2009 (23)
Follower
(67)
Flektogon 2.8 / 35 and 2.8 / 65 optical system appeared in 1952. Design was for the Harry Zollner
(Harry Zollner) and Rudolf Sorisshi (Rudolf Sorisshi). Rear group side (yellow) is a
Biometar type lens unquestionably. This lens element of the foremost group (red)
is added to, are retrofocus of to comply with the singlelens reflex camera. Shows
a highresolution depiction force good sharpness to the periphery, very good
performance and the like are to achieve macro shooting average high closeup
ability, it gained popularity with the boom of a singlelens reflex camera. Given the
product concept to make use of the excellent depiction characteristics of Biometar
to the fullest, from reaching the strong wideangle lens in closeup, will the thing
perfectly natural
Useful site
Camera Eccentric
Collectiblend (price guide)
MFlenses
Manual Focus Forum
Soviet Cams.com
Other planning site
5/27/2016
M42 MOUNT SPIRAL: Carl Zeiss Jena BIOMETAR 80mm F2.8, M42 / P6 (Pentacon-six) mount
In 1952 from 1951, it seems to have raised a plan to large diameter the
Biometar, prototype five with an aperture ratio of F2 (50mm, 58mm, 50mm,
80mm, 120mm) have been produced on a trial basis. However, sufficient
performance can not reached for either commercially not be obtained by this
aperture ratio. From 1954 through 1958, this time F3.5 and F4 prototype of
which was suppressed modest aperture ratio than F2.8 (3.5 / 80, 3.5 / 105, 4/80,
4/85) is tentatively structure It is. It is either intended to explore the possibility
of as stretching for the lens, or a rival product (Xenotar and Planar) was a
movement to combat what has been issued a lowcost product with reduced
aperture ratio to F3.5 at the same time Seem. However, none was never
commercialized. Continued raised are plans to expand the product lineup of the
aperture ratio F2.8 is from 1956, a prototype model with the four types of focal
length (40mm, 50mm, 105mm, 120mm ) is the prototype. Telephoto models with
focal length 120mm of which have been manufactured from 1958. Raised the
proposal to be in 1962 to expand the focal length, the two prototype models of
the product of 55mm F2.8 of products and of medium telephoto 77mm F2.8 with
a standard angle of view is the prototype. However, probably because the
performance of the PANCOLAR that have appeared around the same time was
good. Here also not commercialized. Whether the latter of 77mm model is the
prototype in any position to 80mm of the current product, I can not imagine at
all. Since 1965 Tsueruna Dr. retired from Zeiss, the development of the prototype
is not performed.
CINEMACHIC Cinematic
Tokyu Seminar BE: Old lens Paradise
1950 1959 year aluminum barrel 2.8 / 35 CONTAX IIa / IIIa for Tcoating 1959 year end of production
1958 1962 years knurled part leather design (aluminum / black barrel) 2.8 / 80,2.8 / 120 P6 / Exakta / M42, 1Q
19621964 time knurled portion protruding design (black barrel) 2.8 / 80, 2.8 / 120 , P6 / Exakta / M42
19651970 time zebra barrel 2.8 / 80, 2.8 / 120, P6 / Exakta / M42, for export aus Jena inscription, 1Q
1970's midterm from the previous fiscal year black barrel 2.8 / 80,2.8 / 120, MC ( deficit), P6 / M42
1981 years from the mid1970s black barrel 2.8 / 80,2.8 / 120, MC (white character), P6 / M42
The number is small, but for the Rolleiflex, for Praktina, also Biometar for Bronica
(Zenzanon inscription) have been produced. It should be noted that, in the late
type of black Kyodo model are working to streamline the production line by the
same as the optical system for the P6 mounting and M42 mount. M42 mount of
black Kyodo model is only overlaying the Zeiss genuine mount adapter from the
top of the P6 mount.
history of availability
M42 mount of aluminum barrel model (abbreviated as BiometarM42silver) 195
euros ( 21500) from Frankfurt, Germany for a used camera of skill in the art
"camera Gentle Man" through the eBay in August 2011 + postage prompt decision
price of in a successful bid purchase. This trader is quite excellent and 99.8%
positive feedback in the review number of transactions 5621. Large quantities
presents a vivid photograph, commodity explanation had been firm. Has been
given a shop own rank with respect to the state of the product, the drive system
is the highest rank, the optical system is also the highest rank, the appearance is
modest and the middle, but was in good condition as far as looking at the photos.
Thing and get the front and rear of the cap. I decided to buy believe named
gentleman. Overseas eBay market is around US $ 250300 of the same goods. In
the Yahoo auction it would be about 3000035000. Arrived goods had a
contamination of very slightly dust, but the glass surface was a very good
Entry of 2016
5/27/2016
M42 MOUNT SPIRAL: Carl Zeiss Jena BIOMETAR 80mm F2.8, M42 / P6 (Pentacon-six) mount
Biometar 80mm F2.8 (P6 mount aluminum barrel model). In this blog it will be referred to as a
BiometarP6silver. Right P6M42 mount adapter (Zeiss genuine): filter diameter of 58mm, aperture
F2.8F22, diaphragm blades number eight, the diaphragm mechanism is automatic iris, the shortest
photographing distance 1m, the barrel material is aluminum alloy, coating surface magenta color in a
single layer (single coating), are part of amber is entered into the internal
MC Biometar 80mm F2.8 (P6 mount black barrel model). In this blog it will be referred to as a MC
BiometarP6black. Right genuine P6M42 mount adapter Zeiss. This adapter is the only thing say
5/27/2016
M42 MOUNT SPIRAL: Carl Zeiss Jena BIOMETAR 80mm F2.8, M42 / P6 (Pentacon-six) mount
indeed the genuine products, but sturdily can be and also accuracy looks good: The filter diameter of
58mm, weight 282g, diaphragm blades are eight configuration, aperture F2.8F22, the diaphragm
mechanism is automatic iris, shortest photographing distance 1m, diaphragm blades number eight,
multicoating is deposited on the glass surface
The last of the three eyes is a rare M42 mount of black barrel model (Biometar
P6Black). That said M42 mount, the same as the optical system P6 mount
version, it is only made in genuine P6M42 adapter with M42 mount of Zeiss to
this. Late model seems to production line in this way is one of. Here it was
purchased in March 2011 through the eBay from Poland of the photo hobby.
Product was not on sale in the $ 235 + $ 40 shipping, but got negotiate haggling
and whether at 205 dollars. Since the mailing cost is high negotiation is essential.
Auction description is "not scratch, mold, is fogging the glass. Appearance is to
determine in the photograph" every time familiar with things. Arrived goods was a
beautiful optical system. Photo Hobby is a fascinating cellar to exhibit a large
number of rare items, suspicious commodity commentary, since it such as in the
previous Silver model is common, it is necessary to carefully consider seeing a
photograph well. Yahoo! Auctions of this product market would be about 20000
25000.
shooting test
if Kome looking through the peripheral image quality captured by the open
aperture Even what lens, resolution and contrast is clearly lower than the central
part, a greater or lesser degree distortion aberration and coma is noticeable. It
should be understood that if the design theory of notably the lens than the
deterioration of the image quality is the central part. However, the Biometar
draw the blood of topogon are equipped with excellent viewing angle
characteristics, absolutely no sense of insecurity even placed in the four corners
of the main subject. Major feature of Biometar uniformity of the focal plane is of
a very high. Is on the Internet has been published many Sample images taken with
Biometar and Xenotar. It is not a few things that feel a strange force is in it.
Composition that is common to many of are those that take in up the main
subject, sharp object is spread in the angle of view full of size up to the four
corners enough to hash, along with the threedimensional effect that produces
the blur of the background, in the words overwhelming force that can not be
what is produced. Photographer they can deliver these Sample images, the talent,
but he of course, must have been used on that a good understanding of the nature
of this kind of lens.
Depiction design of Biometar is overcollection (overcorrection) type to
deliberately leave the spherical aberration. This correction technique is kept
small bulge of spherical aberration, in the open aperture at the cost of those that
is slightly more residual spherical aberration. Although it is possible to increase
the highest resolution in place to close the aperture 12 stage, the image in the
open aperture as the reaction is slightly sweet. The depiction design of Zeiss is
praised as the first class is in the place where it is exquisite setting that does not
feel a decrease in the resolving power even in the open aperture. Also in the
depiction of Biometar and its advanced technology we live, birth to wick into the
resolution a sense of softness of the appearance by the sharp change in tone, not
to completely feel the sweetness of the image. Resolving power in F4 close one
step from the open aperture is greatly improved, also improved contrast. The
interference of a certain image as refreshing. 2stage close at F5.6 contrast is
further improved, the resolution also peripheral portion is significantly improved.
Overall sharpness reach a very high level. Precisely to draw the subject to detail,
it becomes depiction was sharp crispy gradation change. However, it is not that
the shadow part would be burnt to a crisp, the tone is changing polite while
maintaining the smoothness. If the composition to put the subject in the center
F4, if the composition you want to copy to the sharp throughout F5.6 will be said
to be the most delicious aperture value. Color is strongly yellow in it is the
temperature control of the previous fiscal year type of mono coat era, bluish in
the late type MC (multicoating) is applied to the glass is turned slightly increased
cool tone slightly. Both are wellgreat coloring color glue. Round and round blur
while very weak even slightly out in the open aperture. However, rather than a
significant level as a Gaussian type lens, which never blur is disturbed greatly by.
There is a drawback to universal Biometar. In general, overcorrected spherical
aberration causes the side effect of the blur becomes hard. Edge to the contour
of the image of the outoffocus portion in the aperture is remaining, it becomes
noisy blur that lacks the smoothness in some cases. Biometar is no exception.
5/27/2016
M42 MOUNT SPIRAL: Carl Zeiss Jena BIOMETAR 80mm F2.8, M42 / P6 (Pentacon-six) mount
Also, speaking about a fine thing, pick up the chromatic aberration (axial
chromatic aberration) in the case used in the recent highperformance digital
camera, the outline of the subject is that the browned clearly. Enlarged display
will not be anxious to be even. Below to give an example by the film photography
and digital photography (Uncensoredfree processing).
digital photography
5/27/2016
M42 MOUNT SPIRAL: Carl Zeiss Jena BIOMETAR 80mm F2.8, M42 / P6 (Pentacon-six) mount
Use equipment Nikon D3 digital (AWB) + focal length 70mm for metal hood
F5.6; MC BiometarP6Black on Nikon D3 digital (AWB): I big deal because I Utsuru and every nook and
corner to this only tightly. A comparison image in the aperture open here will be posted on, detail has
become a little soft depicted in the software
F8 BiometarM42silver on Nikon D3 digital: This Biometar the shortest photographing distance what
0.8m but, originally is a strong lens in closeup photography. Unabated the sharpness of crispy even in
closeup
5/27/2016
M42 MOUNT SPIRAL: Carl Zeiss Jena BIOMETAR 80mm F2.8, M42 / P6 (Pentacon-six) mount
Reach resolution contrast has reached a crescendo in the F5.6 is also very high level to the
periphery; F5.6 MC BiometarP6black on Nikon D3 digital (AWB). There is no anxiety can have the
main subject in the four corners if Utsure and catchy so far
5/27/2016
M42 MOUNT SPIRAL: Carl Zeiss Jena BIOMETAR 80mm F2.8, M42 / P6 (Pentacon-six) mount
F2.8 MC BiometarP6black on Nikon D3 digital (AWB): here also it is noisy blur lacking smoothness.
Sometimes it is out of round blur, but there is very little
(Restarted in Jan.13
2015) thank you to explicitly cited
source in the case to divert the body
of the Link free this blog (M42
mount spiral). Permission of the link
to this blog is not required.
Unauthorized use of photos Sample
images and diagrams please refrain.
Copyright (C) 20092016
Label (by manufacturer)
5/27/2016
M42 MOUNT SPIRAL: Carl Zeiss Jena BIOMETAR 80mm F2.8, M42 / P6 (Pentacon-six) mount
The area of A in the photo above (center) and B of the area (the periphery) larger
displays, but the photo below that was ordered by the aperture value. It is
enlarged and displayed when you click the image. Since the photo to bother blog
standard viewer of there may not be enough expansion, good to look at our store
to once PC the image from the rightclick.
Gauss
Type
(37)
Retrofocus Type (28)
Tessar Type (15) Triplet Type
(12) Xenotar Type (10) Macro
Image quality evaluation of this kind are carried out several times in the past in
this blog, but those familiar every time. Predictably with respect to this Biometar,
the image quality of the peripheral portion B is a very good result.
Although the central portion A sweet imaging details in the open aperture,
contrast is good because the perceived resolution is kept good. Resolving power in
F4 squeeze one stage is firmly resolved to fine unevenness greatly improved.
However, since the improvement of the resolving power at the center also
focuses to F5.6 slight, it would be sufficient to geared up to F4 If put the main
subject in the center. Peripheral part B image in the open aperture is a Moya',
lowering of contrast and resolution can be seen. However, not even be detected
is not observed distortion of the flow image by such as coma. Compared to the
results of a similar test for the other lens that was done in the past, the image
quality is stable at a high level. Contrast and resolving power in F4 squeeze one
stage is rapidly improving. In addition image quality is improved and squeeze up
to F5.6, in this area, it is almost the best image quality. In the case of using a
peripheral portion of the image to copy the main subject will be good to squeeze
up to F5.6.
5/27/2016
M42 MOUNT SPIRAL: Carl Zeiss Jena BIOMETAR 80mm F2.8, M42 / P6 (Pentacon-six) mount
Most of sharp image was obtained of the three BIOMETAR obtained this time
instead of two of P6 mount version Strangely enough, was a silver mirror body
(M42 mount) early type of 35mm format. Because for a multicoating P6 was
convinced that good contrast, was surprised to unexpected results. Perhaps,
because no camera is adapted to the image format P6 lens, reflection occurs at
the inside of the adapter, which is considered to have lower contrast.
BIOMETAR / XENOTAR type lens wonder exist how in the world. The information
that I have grabbed keep listed below. But probably there are many others as
well, I want to know all, if it can be.
Xenotar Type) Carl Zeiss (Oberkochen) Planar 2.8 / 80, 3.5 / 75 Planar T * / 135
(1975? Early Model For Contax, 5 Elements / 5 Groups) Carl Zeiss (YashicaContax)
Planar 2/135 (5 Elements In 5 Groups) Planar 2.8 / 100 (Linhof, inverse Unilite type,
4E In 5G) Voigtlander Dynarex 3.4 / 90 (5 Elements In 4 Groups) Dynaron 4.5 / 100
(5E In 4G) Ultragon 5.5 / 115 (modified inverted Biometar / Xenotar type) NIKON
Nikon AiS Nikkor 2/85 (5Elements In 5Groups) AiS Nikkor 1.8 / 105 (5Elements In 5
Groups) MICRO Nikkor 5.6 / 150 (6 Elements In 4 Groups) WNIKKOR 1.8 / 35 (LeicaL)
Ai 4/200 Nikkor (5Elements In 5 groups) Leitz ApoSummicron 2/90 (5Elements In 5
groups) PENTAX SMC PENTAX A 50MmF2 (5 group five) SMC PENTAX M 50MmF2 (5
group five) KONICA HEXANON 2/35 (LeicaL) HEXANON 3.5 / 200 (KONICA F) UC
5/27/2016
M42 MOUNT SPIRAL: Carl Zeiss Jena BIOMETAR 80mm F2.8, M42 / P6 (Pentacon-six) mount
5/27/2016
M42 MOUNT SPIRAL: Carl Zeiss Jena BIOMETAR 80mm F2.8, M42 / P6 (Pentacon-six) mount
5/27/2016
M42 MOUNT SPIRAL: Carl Zeiss Jena BIOMETAR 80mm F2.8, M42 / P6 (Pentacon-six) mount
40 comments:
JY December 12, 2011 21:06
LeitzColorplan2.5 / 90 is ... Hey is useless.
reply
reply
5/27/2016
M42 MOUNT SPIRAL: Carl Zeiss Jena BIOMETAR 80mm F2.8, M42 / P6 (Pentacon-six) mount
Part 2
as a little maniac lens
Micro Nikkor 70/5 just by looking at the diagram, the model as an unknown lens by
Grtzel Le design Planar 85 / 1.4 as a lens in the study W. Rokkoru 35/4 (preset) 4 the
retro focus in five groups, the front lens is small, so is recessed in the back perhaps,
also the kana Kusenotaru I think. It is under investigation. Are you interested in the
configuration diagram of the macro Nikkor 65 / 4.5. It survives if it is possible to
disclose. Maiyojon'nu
reply
reply
5/27/2016
M42 MOUNT SPIRAL: Carl Zeiss Jena BIOMETAR 80mm F2.8, M42 / P6 (Pentacon-six) mount
reply
reply
5/27/2016
M42 MOUNT SPIRAL: Carl Zeiss Jena BIOMETAR 80mm F2.8, M42 / P6 (Pentacon-six) mount
reply
reply
reply
reply
5/27/2016
M42 MOUNT SPIRAL: Carl Zeiss Jena BIOMETAR 80mm F2.8, M42 / P6 (Pentacon-six) mount
reply
5/27/2016
M42 MOUNT SPIRAL: Carl Zeiss Jena BIOMETAR 80mm F2.8, M42 / P6 (Pentacon-six) mount
Please let me organize a little information. Some LIST It might deformation xenotar are
mixed. Thank you thanks. However, ... Nante true story can be heard Naa has
become interesting.
reply
5/27/2016
M42 MOUNT SPIRAL: Carl Zeiss Jena BIOMETAR 80mm F2.8, M42 / P6 (Pentacon-six) mount
interesting. How good story even is the Canon 50 / 2.2,85 / 1.8 of the designer, but
is neither Jiro Mukai. Japan is of the lens designer, it seems to be less in the sun
as I, are you interested in designer. Yesterday When I was organizing the material, of
AiS Nikkor 105 / 1.8
manual came out.
Deformation habit of five groups of five
configuration node mistake in tar type
no. Maiyojon'nu What problem of the
computer settings. Only anonymously, you can not post.
reply
reply
reply
5/27/2016
M42 MOUNT SPIRAL: Carl Zeiss Jena BIOMETAR 80mm F2.8, M42 / P6 (Pentacon-six) mount
Is Not Not A Xenotar / Biometar Type ... (I Own Both Of Them, Different Charactiristics
....)
reply
reply
5/27/2016
M42 MOUNT SPIRAL: Carl Zeiss Jena BIOMETAR 80mm F2.8, M42 / P6 (Pentacon-six) mount
reply
5/27/2016
M42 MOUNT SPIRAL: Carl Zeiss Jena BIOMETAR 80mm F2.8, M42 / P6 (Pentacon-six) mount
obtained, et al. , but> is not is that the lens to be a depiction of a taste. I think since
the optical system is not symmetric, Biometar / Xenotar type seems chromatic
aberration in the neck. Will also due to the individual, but the outline of the subject
before and after focusing coloring strongly, it will be allowed to consider it as Doki. >
Micro Nikkor 150 / 5.6 is a 6lens configuration 4 groups. > Depending on the official
book of Nikon. "4th is doublet" "four groups th doublet" I think no doubt in? If you do
so, the bonding of the group side of the rear of the double Gauss because would be the
type to be removed, or from deformation Xenotar is, who he called after the group
separation type of deformation Gauss is whether appropriate , I think. Also Part 5 was
very helpful! Thank you thanks. Leave the verification of the list to the yearend and
New Year holidays.
5/27/2016
M42 MOUNT SPIRAL: Carl Zeiss Jena BIOMETAR 80mm F2.8, M42 / P6 (Pentacon-six) mount
reply
reply
reply
reply
5/27/2016
M42 MOUNT SPIRAL: Carl Zeiss Jena BIOMETAR 80mm F2.8, M42 / P6 (Pentacon-six) mount
reply
Olympus
OM
Bellows
Macro
Lenses
Http://Www.Alanwood.Net/photography/olympus/macrolens13545.Html This is also
... so? Naa, and.
reply
5/27/2016
M42 MOUNT SPIRAL: Carl Zeiss Jena BIOMETAR 80mm F2.8, M42 / P6 (Pentacon-six) mount
out even while the same structure as the Rolleiflex 2.8GX, seems an element spacing
so that the best performance had been adjusted in the 24x36. If the 6x6 is inferior,
does not mean that, because the large format print magnification ratio is different,
there is no sense to the highperformance only the center, who peripheral is too fall
will affect the print, is that. The number of the MTF curve that has been presented in
a largeformat lens catalog of Rodenstock GmbH is, we measure two Toka four contrast
per certainly mm. At 35mm, for example Zeiss It is this 10, 20, 40. This is because the
expansion rate is different, will only become a center of largeformat lens that has
been designed on the basis of two millimeters a result which can not endure the print
even if the crop at 35mm. So I first would be deemed to be replaced store began to
use in the hype, complaining about the "delicious center" will have a very
uncomfortable feeling to the current situation that is walking alone. Even in the ultra
high performance, the center also be a level of lens to withstand the small format,
what by using in its native format, and personally I think. Of course, on which I was
well aware that the above will be diverted out of necessity, or does not deny that the
priority is given to the practical use. Genuine accessories, Pentacon and Asahi Optical,
Olympus, it has put out the Nikon also lens adapter. 19th century classical lenses,
peripheral Bokeboke, since the center only come focus, I guess there is that crop in the
sense that "peripheral can not eat," rather than a "delicious center". . . .
reply
reply
spiral
lensmania's have long silence. Xenotar of the ledger, but does not yet take
the confirmation either. List Thank you for additional information. Has been
updated. > Compare the 80 / 2.8 and the M42 for P6, matter was an
excellent image quality better of to and M42 compared 24X36, > I think it is
of course. For P6 in order to depict equally full screen of 6x6 because you
have been> design, the balance of the whole also dropped the performance
of the center should have taken>, and M42size that can be our best pitching
in 24x36, small in format it is natural that> defeated After comparison. >
Previous Planar 80 / 2.8 for the Rollei RF35 that Horseman was out also, >
while the same configuration as the Rolleiflex 2.8GX, the best performance
to become so in the 24x36 is> so had been adjusting the element spacing. >
Towards the 6x6 is inferior, does not mean that, large format because> print
enlargement factor is different, meaning there is no even in the high
performance only the heart, > who peripheral is too fall will affect the print,
that thing. That internal reflection in the mirror box is also generated, P6
lens in 35mm format is and has been to contribute to lowering the
performance, it has been interpreted by the inside of me. Dropped the
performance of the heart, because the balance of the whole you an interest.
Perhaps and thickness of the lens element, of the entire optical system by
changing the roundness, the priority for the effect of correcting spherical
aberration and astigmatism it will not tune operation. > Of the MTF curves
are presented in a largeformat lens catalog of Rodenstock GmbH > the
number is, we measure two Toka four contrast per certainly mm. > In 35mm,
for example Zeiss It is this 10, 20, 40. This expansion rate is different from>,
the center of the largeformat lens that has been designed on the basis of
the two mm in 35mm will only result which can not endure the print be>
crop. > > So I first would be deemed to be replaced store began to use in the
hype, > complain of "delicious center" is a very uncomfortable feeling to the
current situation that is walking alone > it has. Even in the ultrahigh
performance, the center also bear in a small format even> level of lens, what
by using in its original format, I think personally and>. I see. When the image
format is different, the lens of the large format, in the resolving power of
the central part it is not that the loss. This is convincing. "Delicious center"
... I also feel a sense of discomfort.
5/27/2016
M42 MOUNT SPIRAL: Carl Zeiss Jena BIOMETAR 80mm F2.8, M42 / P6 (Pentacon-six) mount
reply
5/27/2016
M42 MOUNT SPIRAL: Carl Zeiss Jena BIOMETAR 80mm F2.8, M42 / P6 (Pentacon-six) mount
reply
reply
reply
spiral
Tonight do is because I did not remove the> ZEISS flow orthodox. Pentax
guess I was aiming for Zeiss. Whether via the what kind of process, is now of
Pentax Is there a thing of there achievements of designer group led by Mr.
Yasuo Takahashi, I think. So it will be helpful. > By the way, one person in he
was human resources emissions of Waseda Applied Physics Phase 1. Did
Waseda University Applied Physics. That is my senior .... It is emotional. >
Although Japan has been aging there are still excellent craftsmen. I agree.
Craftsmen we have opportunities for new Rata activity is required, but if
bringing together their skills, and can be something great, believe so. Thank
you for your comment.
reply
5/27/2016
M42 MOUNT SPIRAL: Carl Zeiss Jena BIOMETAR 80mm F2.8, M42 / P6 (Pentacon-six) mount
...
Since the posting of anonymous we do not accept now, I need your help by a handle name and
the like. In addition, as in when you post your question to return the reply always to
respondents, we ask the compliance of manners.
Home
Older Post