Professional Documents
Culture Documents
I. INTRODUCTION
High-efficiency and high-power-density in power
converters can be achieved by reducing switching losses,
minimizing reverse recovery effects in rectifiers, reducing
spikes created by parasitic elements, recovering as much
energy as possible and returning it to the power flow of
the power supply. In order to achieve these objectives,
numerous soft-switching circuit techniques [1]-[3], like
Zero Voltage Switching (ZVS) and Zero Current
Switching (ZCS), and many different and new resonant
topologies, including quasi-resonant and multi-resonant
converters [4]-[6], have been proposed and discussed in
the literature. In particular, resonant converters have the
benefits of high efficiency and high power density, with a
low level of Electro-Magnetic Interference (EMI) [7].
However, there are considerable drawbacks to using
variable frequency-controlled resonant converters, some
of which include the difficulty in maintaining resonance
operation and ensuring high efficiency over a wide
dynamic range [8], in sizing appropriate magnetic
components [9], in designing the input and output filter
due to variable frequency of the converter [10]. On the
contrary, pulse-width modulation (PWM) converters have
a constant frequency of operation, however they usually
work under hard switching conditions, with
semiconductor device voltages and currents changing
abruptly from high values to zero and vice-versa at turnon and turn-off resulting in switching losses and
considerable EMI. In order to reduce these switching
losses and improve PWM converter efficiency, improved
M. A. Hallworth and S. A. Shirsavar are with the School of Systems
Eng., University of Reading, Reading, Berkshire, RG6 6AY, U.K. Email: mhallworth@theiet.org; s.a.shirsavar@reading.ac.uk.
G. Di Capua and N. Femia are with Department of Information Eng.,
Electrical Eng. and Applied Mathematics, University of Salerno,
Fisciano (SA), Italy, Email: gdicapua@unisa.it; femia@unisa.it.
(a)
(b)
2 n f s Lleak
Vo D
Deff D D D
2 I Lo
Lo 2 f s
Vin
Gvd
(1)
(2)
vo
d
io 0
vin 0
nVin
L
R
s 2 LoCo s o Rd Co d 1
R
load
Rload
(3)
An enhanced PWM switch-based model for smallsignal analysis of the PSFB converter is proposed in this
paper and is discussed in detail in this section. The
corresponding circuit for the PSFB PWM switch-based
ia Deff ic deff I c
v D v d V
(5.b)
(5.c)
v
ic iCo out iout
Rload
(5.d)
1
vout ESRo
s
C
o
(5.e)
cp
eff
ap
eff
(5.a)
ap
iCo
deff d di dv
(6.a)
R
di d ic
Vap
(6.b)
Vout Deff
dv I c
4 f s Lo
Rd
2 vap
Vap
(6.c)
where vap nvin , vc ' p vout and D 'eff 1 Deff . Using the
MATLAB Symbolic Toolbox, the analytical expressions
of the PSFB transfer functions have been evaluated and
their explicit formulations are presented in the following.
The duty-to-output transfer function Gvd represents the
sensitivity of output voltage to duty-cycle variations,
when input voltage and output current are locked at their
steady-state values. The transfer function Gvd is most
important in control loop design. In fact, in Voltage Mode
Control (VMC), Gvd is connected to the control-to-output
transfer function Gvc vout / vctr GPWM Gvd , where GPWM is
(a)
(b)
out
(4.c)
2
Ploss = Vout I out 1 Req I out
(4.d)
Gvd
vout
d
iout 0
vin 0
vout
d
iout 0
vin 0
s ESRoCo 1
nVin Rload
(8)
nVin s ESRoCo 1
2
Lo
ESRo
ESRo Req 4n f s Lleak
s 2 LoCo 1
ESRoCo Co Req 4n 2 f s Lleak 1
s
1
Rload
Rload
Rload
Rload
(7)
Lo
Co
2
Co
Lo
2
(9.a)
(9.b)
Rload ESRo
Gvg
Z out
vout
vin
iout 0
d 0
v
out
iout
V
nDeff n 2 Lleak o
V
in
B. Experimental verification
Experimental measurements of the open loop transfer
functions have been realized by means of the Texas
Instruments high-efficiency evaluation board shown in
Fig.4, including the PSFB voltage-mode controller
UCC28950PW[40]. The following operating conditions
were applied: Vin=36V, Vout=14V, Iout=10A, fs=188kHz.
Main power devices mounted on the board are listed in
Table I. All the converter open-loop transfer functions
were measured using the OMICRON Lab Bode 100
vector network analyzer. Numerous small-signal
measurements were performed using analog small-signal
injection techniques [41]. In order to verify the validity of
the proposed dynamic model, measurements of the output
filter components and of the transformer were also carried
out and the following measured values were obtained:
Co=1354uF, ESRo=21.2m, Lo=5.3uH, DCRo=35.4m,
Lleak=191nH. Also, the converters efficiency was at
=96.6%.
Part numbers
Transformer
Manufact.
BSC123N08NS3-G
Infineon
ES1D
Diodes
SER2918H-472
Coilcraft
EEUFK1V152L
Panasonic
ECA2AHG101
Panasonic
C1210C225K1RACTU
(x3)
Kemet
PN-54922 (Custom)
Payton
Deff
4 fs
s ESRoCo 1
Rload
2
R
L
L
C
R
ESR
o o load
o
o s s 2n n
load
d 0
vin 0
Main attributes
Vds=80V, Id=55A
Rds,on=12.3m,
Super Fast Rect.,
Vf=0.92V, If=1A
SMT, L=4.7uH,
DCR=2.86m
Aluminum, 35V,
C=1500uF
Aluminum, 100V,
C=100uF
Ceramic, 100V,
C=2.2uF
np=4, ns=2,
Pmax=294W
(10)
(11)
Magnitude [dB]
30
Magnitude [dB]
-40
-50 2
10
- Enhanced Model
out
Zout- Measurement
3
10
Frequency [Hz]
10
10
40
20
0
-20
-40
-60 2
10
- Enhanced Model
out
Zout- Measurement
3
10
Frequency [Hz]
10
10
Fig. 7. Measured (dotted lines) and simulated (solid lines) load-tooutput transfer function.
1
vout ESRo
s ESLo iCo
s Co
0
-10
G - Enhanced Model
-20
vc
10
Frequency [Hz]
10
10
-100
G - Enhanced Model
vc
Gvc- Measurement
-150
10
10
Frequency [Hz]
10
10
Fig. 5. Measured (dotted lines) and simulated (solid lines) controlto-output transfer function.
30
Magnitude [dB]
-20
-40
vg
Gvg- Measurement
3
Frequency [Hz]
10
10
0
-10
G - Enhanced Model
-20
vc
Gvc- Measurement
3
10
Frequency [Hz]
10
10
0
-50
-50
-100
G - Enhanced Model
vc
-100
vg
10
Gvg- Measurement
2
10
Frequency [Hz]
Gvc- Measurement
-150
G - Enhanced Model
-150
10
10
Phase [Degrees]
10
20
-30 2
10
G - Enhanced Model
-60 2
10
(12)
Gvc- Measurement
-50
Magnitude [dB]
-30
10
Phase [Degrees]
-20
20
-30 2
10
Phase [Degrees]
-10
Phase [Degrees]
The measured and the simulated results for the controlto-output transfer function Gvc is shown in Fig. 5: there is
excellent agreement between the experimental result
(dashed gray line) and the proposed PSFB enhanced
dynamic model (black continuous line). Also, the
experimental measurements (dashed gray line) and the
simulated results (black continuous line) for the input-tooutput transfer function Gvg and the load-to-output
transfer function Zout are shown in Fig. 6 and Fig. 7,
respectively. The resulting agreement between the
measured and simulated transfer functions permits to
validate the proposed enhanced model for small-signal
analysis of the PSFB converter.
10
10
10
Frequency [Hz]
10
10
Fig. 6. Measured (dotted lines) and simulated (solid lines) input-tooutput transfer function.
Fig. 8. Measured (dotted lines) and simulated (solid lines) controlto-output transfer function including ESLo.
Compensator
design
Controller Type
Gva , E
Gva , S
2 f p1
s
2 f p1
s
1 s 2 f z1
1 s 2 f
p2
1 s 2 f z1
1 s 2 f
p2
Tc, E
fc, E
fs
Cross-over
@ 3.5kHz
80
0
-80
-160 0
10
10
Frequency [Hz]
10
10
90
fp1=347Hz
fz1=1.80kHz
fp2=6.82kHz
0
-90
-180
Phase margin
of 65
-270 0
10
fp1=830 Hz
fz1=1.66 kHz
fp2=7.39 kHz
10
Frequency [Hz]
10
10
(a)
Tu, S
Magnitude [dB]
160
80
Tc, S
Tc, S - real
fc, S
fc, S - real
Cross-over
@ 3.5kHz
fs
Cross-over
@ 7.8kHz
0
-80
-160 0
10
10
10
Frequency [Hz]
10
90
Phase [deg]
Tu, E
160
Magnitude [dB]
Phase [deg]
Phase margin
of 50
0
-90
-180
-270 0
10
Phase margin
of 65
2
10
10
Frequency [Hz]
10
(b)
Fig. 9. Uncompensated and compensated loop gain transfer
functions for enhanced (a) and simplified (b) model.
Vout [mV]
Vout [mV]
100
75
50
25
0
-25
0
0.2
0.4
0.6
Time [sec]
0.8
1
x 10
-3
Fig. 10. Line step responses using the compensated loop gain
transfer functions Tc,E (grey line), Tc,E-S (black dashed line), Tc,S
(black line)
G
Gvc
vc
20
20
10
10
[1]
[2]
[3]
00
-10
-10
[4]
-20
-20
1
101
10
102
10
103
10
Frequency
Frequency [Hz]
[Hz]
104
10
105
10
(a)
[Degrees]
Phase
Phase[Degrees]
REFERENCES
00
-25
-25
-50
-50
[5]
[6]
-75
-75
-100
-100
1
1
10
10
2
10
10
3
10
10
Frequency [Hz]
[Hz]
Frequency
4
10
10
5
10
10
(b)
Fig. 11. PSFB control-to-output transfer function modification for
Lleak=0.2H, =[98.6,96.6, 94.6,92.6]% (from gray to black).
[7]
[8]
[dB]
Magnitude
Magnitude[dB]
Gvc
G
vc
20
20
10
10
[9]
00
-10
-10
-20
-20
1
1
10
10
2
10
10
3
10
10
Frequency
Frequency [Hz]
[Hz]
4
10
10
[10]
5
10
10
[Degrees]
Phase
Phase[Degrees]
(a)
[11]
00
-25
-25
-50
-50
-75
-75
[12]
-100
-100
1
101
10
102
10
103
10
Frequency [Hz]
[Hz]
Frequency
104
10
105
10
(b)
Fig. 12. PSFB control-to-output transfer function modification for
=96.6% and Lleak=[0.02,0.2,2, 10]H (from gray to black).
[13]
[14]
[15]
[16]
[17]
[18]
[19]
[20]