Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Introduction
Anthropology is the scientific, comparative and holistic study of the human being and it is the
study of human being and all the things they do, think, say and make. Anthropology is a uniquely
wide-ranging discipline because of its twin perspective-biological and cultural. It is also often
described as the bio-cultural since it includes every aspect of the human existence and activities.
Anthropology also describe in the holistic approach.
It is comparative study in which it seeks to compare and contrast the differences among the
human groups and comprehensive since no human group is excluded.
Definition
“Anthropology is the study of a mankind especially of its societies and customer, study of
structure and evolution of the man as an animal.” (Oxford dictionary)
“Anthropology is the scientific study of the physical, cultural, social development and behavior of
human being as their appearance on earth.” (Jacobs and Stern)
“Anthropology is the broad scientific discipline which is dedicated to the comparative study of
mankind from its first appearance to present stage of development.” (Dictionary of Anthropology)
Mr. Edward B. Taylor was the father of Anthropology in 1872. Bohannan explains, “For many
years in the 19th century, anthropology was said to be Mr. Taylor science in England”. Edward
Taylor under the influence of Mr. Mathew Arnold and others in his days adopted the word
Anthropology and the study of cultural from Germany. In 20th century, according to T. K. Penn
Inman have formed the following steps:
From the period of this or E. B. Taylor Anthropology is divided into two terms:
Physical Anthropology
Cultural Anthropology
Critical Period
During the critical period (1900-1935) it is divided into two terms that is: Evolutionism and
Expansionism. After critical study of evolutionism and expansionism it becomes to
Functionalism
Structuralism
Different anthropologists around the 20th century, defined anthropology as the Convergence and
Consideration period – After 1935.
Natural and Scope
Anthropology used scientific method to collect data, to interpret data, to generalize and to
formulate theories. Anthropology, the study of people can be considered as a scientific discipline.
Unlink most other science, however, anthropology is both social science as well as biological
science depending on exactly what is being studied with what degree of subjectivity or objectivity.
Scope Anthropology
Area of Anthropology
Pre-historical Archaeology
Cultural Anthropology (this is the total study of human life.)
Conclusion
Any maters to human being from past to present are the subject matter of the Anthropology and
physical and cultural totality of human beings in the scope of Anthropology.
Branches of Anthropology
1. Academic anthropology
Physical anthropology
Cultural anthropology
Physical Anthropology: is also known as the Biological Anthropology. “Physical Anthropology is
concerned with body characteristics of the men.”(Paddington).
It tries to trace the ancestry of the human species in order to understand how, when and why we
because the kind of human beings as we are today.
Cultural Anthropology
Archaeology derived from two words Archaios and Logia, which mean ancient and the logia
means to study about human life. It is classified into three periods, which are as follows:
Archaeology is concerned with the human not only past but also ideas, values and customs
before the origin of writing and it deals with ancient culture and past phase of modern civilization.
Ethnology
It is the branches of cultural anthropology that studies cultural institution like social,
political, economical, religious, etc. and related to one another to understand the total
cultural system of particular group.
Linguistic Anthropology
It studies the different language comparatively and describes the present language and studies
past language to understand how people perceive themselves and around them.
2. Applied anthropology
Human evolution
Human variation
Organization and functions of political institution: Political science is only political study of the
human being but anthropology is the holistic study of them.
Dissimilarity
Development of Anthropology
Modernization
Trickle down approach
Only economic growth is not development, equitable distribution is development. During 1990’s
two school of thought are formed such as:
Development Anthropology
Anthropology of Development
Bhowmix defines Development Anthropology is directly related to the social change and cultural
contact. This is oriented towards the better planning of social development schemes by adequate
data collection and proper analysis of this information for such development programs to achieve
the positively better result.
Ralf Paddington
Gerald D. Berreman
Practicing Anthropology: It shares the knowledge and idea in market. Its main work is
program implementation but it doesn’t make policies and so on.
Larry Nayor
a. Consultative approach
As a consultant
Relation with administrator only in implementation
c. Action approach
d. Claims litigation approach: Social and general discrimination and human rights.
Development Anthropology
Development Anthropology has a sound footing to work for the people, involving the people in a
concrete way for both spectral and overall development. It refers to the use of anthropological
knowledge and methods for the purpose of rationally and humanely solving contemporary social,
economic and technological problems and it also seeks to improve the livelihood condition of the
people in practical life.
It involves in raising the issue of human society by providing information and tries to solve the
practical problems by creation appropriate policy and taking action.
Anthropology of Development
In general anthropology of development can be loosely arranged around the following themes:
Practicing Anthropology
Practicing Anthropology is the new field of anthropology, which is opened up outside the
academy. Practicing Anthropologists are either self-employed in many case or employees with
agencies and corporations for others. Their activities are widely varied and changed according to
the assignments. They include in the research, management, evaluation, training, consultation,
advocacy and so forth. The results are judged by the employer and clients, usually according to
their own standard result of evaluation that is direct consequences for future job or assignments.
According to Willigen, “It appears unlikely that the large numbers of anthropologists entering the
job market as practicing anthropologists now will take academic job in the future. They will not
return because there will be no jobs for them, their salary expectation can’t meet and they just
don’t want to.”
Regional
In resistant societies, the distributive justice is concerned with those who are now
(consumption is higher than saving)
In favorable societies, the distributive justice is also concerned with the future generation
(saving is greater than consumption)
Value of work
Work is not highly valued in progress resistant societies but highly valued in progress
prone societies
Education is the principle instrument for the nurturing of individual capacity and ability in
development favorable culture.
In resistant culture, education is a process that transmits, dogma, producing conformists
and followers.
Questioning minds creates innovation and innovation is the engine of development but in
religious views scientific innovation is heresy. This is against to the religious myth.
Time focus
For stages of time, past, present, immediate future and distant future
The time focus of advance society is future i.e. within reach
Characteristics of traditional culture are the exaltation of the past
Rationality
Authority
Rational society; power resides in the law, supremacy of law, society function according
to the rationality attributed to the cosmos – natural law
In resistant society only few person are authorized
World view
Life view
Resistant; the goal of life is to save oneself from the world, i.e. quest of other world, the
world after death
Favorable; salvation is depends on the individuals efforts to transform this world
Two utopias
Favorable; the world progress slowly towards a distance utopia through the creativity and
efforts of individuals
Resistant; individual seeks early utopia i.e. beyond reach
Resistant optimist is the person who expects that luck, the Gods or the powerful will favor
him or her
Favorable optimist is the person who is resolved to do whatever is necessary to assure a
satisfactory destiny
General Context
Before 1970’s development paradigm was more eco-centric and techno-centric, cultural
aspects were missing.
At that time, most of the development projects were failed, socio-cultural factors were as
obstacle for the diffusion of innovation.
Development activities were/are donor motivated and implemented with western
experience they are not succeeded in developed countries.
It is realized that study about local villagers and their cultures is inevitable for the
development process.
Post 1970’s, development focus has been social and cultural sector, the problem of
social sector must be addressed to improve economic growth.
In 1972, the ADB emphasized in the study or rural life of Asian villages for development.
Concept of target group, focus group or community (for whom development is aimed at)
was emerged along with the study of norms and traditional values as well as caste,
religion, ethnicity etc.
Rural Development
Development Countries
1. Holistic perspective/Approach
Anthropology studies the any problem in totality
Holistic approach gives us the potential seeing the target picture-weaver
Politics are seen in the connections within society as a whole, other policies, the
environment and so forth
To perspective is effective for anticipating potential consequences of particular actions
Mapping out as many of the linkage as possible, encourages analysis to come up with
policies or decisions that simultaneously benefit several institutions or sub-groups
Religion
Education
Cast, ethnicity
Food habit, Accessibility to health institution
Sanitation
HEALTH