Professional Documents
Culture Documents
O-SCAAD-1
May 21, 2002, AIT, Bangkok
Buddhi S. Sharma
ACECOMS, AIT
ACECOMS, AIT
Shear Wall
Definition
Intended Use
Shape in Cross-section
Geometry in Elevation
Loading Type and Intensity
Behavior and Theory
Location, Direction, Orientation
ACECOMS, AIT
Wall
Design of Shear Walls
Column
ACECOMS, AIT
Frame
ACECOMS, AIT
ACECOMS, AIT
Planner Walls
Planer
Design of Shear Walls
Stiffened
Regular
Openings
Irregular Openings
ACECOMS, AIT
Cellular Walls
ACECOMS, AIT
Location and
Layout of
Shear Walls
ACECOMS, AIT
ACECOMS, AIT
Load Center
f
D
Stiffness
Center
?
Building Plan
Design of Shear Walls
ACECOMS, AIT
ACECOMS, AIT
Seismic Loads
Assign the Mass properties to the building and carryout a Modal
Analysis: If the first two modes are Translational, and third mode is
Torsional, then there is no eccentricity between the mass center and
Stiffness Center in Both Directions
ACECOMS, AIT
No Eccentricity
F
D
ACECOMS, AIT
Mode-1
Design of Shear Walls
Mode-2
Mode-3
ACECOMS, AIT
Or
ACECOMS, AIT
ACECOMS, AIT
Vertical Irregularity
Expansion
Joint
No Shear Walls
Balanced Shear
Walls at All Levels
Using Expansion
Joints to eliminate
some walls
ACECOMS, AIT
ACECOMS, AIT
Shear Wall
Behavior
Frame Behavior
ACECOMS, AIT
ACECOMS, AIT
Uniaxial Bending
ACECOMS, AIT
Biaxial Bending
ACECOMS, AIT
Modeling of
Shear Walls
Using Truss
ACECOMS, AIT
ACECOMS, AIT
Simple beam
elements
Beam elements
in Truss Model
H2
H1
t
L
Design of Shear Walls
txh
L
ACECOMS, AIT
t
B
Rigid Zones
ACECOMS, AIT
2t
H
t
B
ACECOMS, AIT
U3, R3
U2, R2
Node 3
U2, R2
Node 4
U1, R1
3
U1, R1
U3, R3
U3, R3
U2, R2
Node 1
U2, R2
Node 2
U1, R1
U1, R1
Shell
ACECOMS, AIT
ACECOMS, AIT
DOFs:
2-Translation, 0 or 1 rotation
Dimension:
2 dimension element
Shape:
Regular / Irregular
Properties:
Modulus of Elasticity(E),
Poisson ratio(v),
Thickness( t )
ACECOMS, AIT
DOFs:
Dimension:
2 dimension element
Shape:
Regular / Irregular
Properties:
Modulus of Elasticity(E),
Poisson ratio(v),
Thickness( t )
U3, R3
U3, R3
U2, R2
Node 3
U2, R2
Node 4
U1, R1
3
U1, R1
U3, R3
U3, R3
U2, R2
Node 1
U2, R2
Node 2
U1, R1
U1, R1
Shell
Design of Shear Walls
ACECOMS, AIT
Modeling Shear-Walls
using Panels only
ACECOMS, AIT
ACECOMS, AIT
Zipper
ACECOMS, AIT
txt
C
B
Design of Shear Walls
t x 2t
t
ACECOMS, AIT
ACECOMS, AIT
ACECOMS, AIT
ACECOMS, AIT
ACECOMS, AIT
Uniaxial
Design of Shear Walls
Biaxial
ACECOMS, AIT
txt
C
t x 2t
B
Design of Shear Walls
ACECOMS, AIT
ACECOMS, AIT
Medium Openings
may convert shear
wall to Pier and
Spandrel System
Beam
Spandrel
Wall
Column
Pier
Pier
ACECOMS, AIT
ACECOMS, AIT
ACECOMS, AIT
Plate-Shell Model
Truss Model
ACECOMS, AIT
Rigid Zones
Beams
3 DOF
per rigid zone
Columns
D: Beam-Column Model
ACECOMS, AIT
Design of
Shear Walls
Ductility Considerations
Anchorage with Footings
Connection with Floor Slab/ Beams
ACECOMS, AIT
Flexural Design
ACECOMS, AIT
Flexural Design
ACECOMS, AIT
Input Needed
P, Mx , (and My)
Wall Dimensions
Problems
Does not consider the non-linear
strain distribution
In efficient rebar distribution
ACECOMS, AIT
Design Procedure
1. Obtain Design Actions from Analysis
2. Assume rebar sizes, amount and distribution
3. Determine Cross-section capacity as column in
form of Interaction Surfaces and Curves
4. Check if all action sets (P, Mx, My) fall within
the interaction surface. The extreme values
should be near the surface
5. If required, revise cross-section and repeat
ACECOMS, AIT
P
Vy
Vx
Mx
My
ACECOMS, AIT
xd
xt
Tension
Member
Design of Shear Walls
xc
Compression
Member
ACECOMS, AIT
Fi Ai f i
n
P Fi
i 1
n
M Fi xi
i 1
n
V Ai vi
i 1
t
f5
x1
f4
f3
f2
f1
C
x1
Design of Shear Walls
ACECOMS, AIT
Assuming Reinforcement
Assume larger bars on the corners
Assume more bars on predominant tension
direction/ location
Assume uniform reinforcement on wall sides
Total Rebars ratio should preferably be more
than 0.8% and less than 3% for economical
design
ACECOMS, AIT
ACECOMS, AIT
Un-safe
Nb
Safe
Nb
ACECOMS, AIT
The surface is
generated by
changing Angle and
Depth of Neutral
Axis
A cross-section of
interaction surface at P
Un-safe
- My
Pu
Safe
- Mz
+ Mz
+ My
1
N z 1
x, y dx dy ...
x y
(
x
,
y
)
...
i
i
i 1
1 n
M x 2
Ai i ( x, y ) yi ...
x y x, y dx dy . y ... 2
1
1
1 n
M y 3
x
,
y
dx
dy
.
x
...
(
x
,
y
)
x
...
i
i
i
1
2
1 x y
ACECOMS, AIT
ACECOMS, AIT
ACECOMS, AIT
ACECOMS, AIT
ACECOMS, AIT
ACECOMS, AIT
Flexural Design
ACECOMS, AIT
ACECOMS, AIT
ACECOMS, AIT
Design Procedure
1. Obtain Design Actions from Analysis
2. Compute Axial Forces
3. For each axial force, assume section, assume
rebars and check capacity
4. If capacity not enough, revise section, recompute Axial Forces, and continue until
required section for each force is designed
5. Provide nominal wall reinforcement in between
the axial zones
ACECOMS, AIT
My
Mx
F1
F2
Fi
x1
x2
F1 0.5P M / x1
F2 0.5P M / x2
Design of Shear Walls
yi
P Mx My
Fi
4
yi
xi
ACECOMS, AIT
T
xd
xt
Tension
Member
Design of Shear Walls
F1 = T
F2 = C
xc
Compression
Member
ACECOMS, AIT
F1=T
F2=C
t
f5
x1
f4
f3
Ai xi t
Fi Ai f i
f2
f1
C
x1
Design of Shear Walls
ACECOMS, AIT
ACECOMS, AIT
ACECOMS, AIT
ACECOMS, AIT
ACECOMS, AIT
Shear Design
Spandrel
Pier
ACECOMS, AIT
ACECOMS, AIT
Lp
tp
ACECOMS, AIT
Vc 3.3RLW
Pu 0.8L p
4Lp
Vc 0.6 RLW
P
L p 1.25 RLW f c 0.2 u
Lpt p
fc
M L
Abs u p
Vu 2
t 0.8 L
p
p
Vc
f ys 0.8L p
Abs Vu
10 RLW
f ct p 0.8L p
ACECOMS, AIT
hs
Ls
Elevation
ts
d r top
a
c
hs
d r bot
Section
Design of Shear Walls
ACECOMS, AIT
f c ts d s
Vu
V c
Vs
f ys d s
Vs 8RLW
f ct s d s
ACECOMS, AIT
When
When
Ls
5
ds
Ls
5 and
ds
Ls
5
ds
Ls
2
10 RLW
3
ds
Vu
and
Vu
Vu
Av min
0.5Vc
50t s
f ys
Ah min 0
0.5Vc
Av min Ah min 0
Check
f ct s d s
Av min 0.0015t s
Ah min 0.0025t s
ACECOMS, AIT
= Length of Spandrel
ts
= Thickness of Spandrel
hs
RLW
ds
Vs
Vc
ACECOMS, AIT
f ys
f c
Lp
= Length of Pier
tp
= Thickness of Pier
Av min
ACECOMS, AIT
Detailing of
Shear Walls
Wall Section
Place more reinforcement at the ends and distribute the
remaining in the middle portion
Confine the Rebars at the end for improved ductility and
increased moment capacity
Option -1
Option -2
Option -3
ACECOMS, AIT
Max M= 380
b) Concentrated Bars
Max M= 475
ACECOMS, AIT
Wall Section
Place more reinforcement at
the corners and distribute the
remaining in the middle
portion
Confine the Rebars at the
corners for improved
ductility and increased
moment capacity
Provide U-Bars at the
corners for easier
construction and improved
laps
ACECOMS, AIT
Max M= 16500
b) Concentrated Bars
Max M= 19600
ACECOMS, AIT
ACECOMS, AIT