UST College of Architecture Logbook

Kindly print this in A4 size paper and
ring bind with clear acetate front cover.

Bring this Thesis Logbook during your
first meeting with the Thesis Adviser.
Page 1 of 145
ARCHITECTURE THESIS LOGBOOK
The Pontifical and Royal

University of Santo Tomas
Espana, Manila
COLLEGE OF ARCHITECTURE
THESIS PROGRAM
ARCHITECTURAL THESIS LOGBOOK
The 2016 Edition

Edited by Ar. Froilan M. Fontecha
UST College of Architecture Thesis Program AY 2016-2017
Page 2 of 145
Copyright 2010
Jonathan V. Manalad
All Rights Reserved
Page 3 of 145
Thesis Logbook Owner Information:

Name:
Year and Section:
Email Address:
Contact Details:
Thesis Adviser:
If found, kindly return to:

UST COLLEGE OF ARCHITECTURE
2F Beato Angelico Building
Manila, Philippines
Page 4 of 145
AD9 Contents
Copyright Page
Thesis Logbook Owner Information
Contents
AY 2016-2017 Architectural Thesis Council
AY 2016-2017 Thesis Advisers
Thesis Adviser's Information
Architectural Design 9 (AD9) Calendar
Guidelines for AD9
Recognition & Acknowledgment of AD9 Policies
AD9 Consultation Sheet Week 1
Review Checklist for Thesis Proposal
Thesis Proposal Evaluation
Thesis Proposal Rubric
Review Checklist for Thesis Book Preliminary Draft
Review Checklist for Thesis Book Pre-final Draft
AD9 Advisers Final Evaluation Sheet
Certificate of Design 9 Completion
2
3
4
6
7
8
9
10
15
17
20
23
26
27
28
29
32
35
38
41
44
45
48
51
54
57
60
63
66
69
70
74
Page 5 of 145
AD10 Contents
General Calendar for Design 10
Guidelines for Design 10
Recognition & Acknowledgment of D10 Policies
D10 Preliminary Endorsement Matrix
Certificate of D10 Preliminary Endorsement
D10 Final Endorsement Matrix
Certificate of D10 Final Endorsement
Thesis Grading Sheet: Adviser
Jury Final Grading Sheet
Grading Sheet: Thesis Juror 1
77
78
91
93
96
99
102
106
108
111
114
117
120
123
126
129
132
136
138
140
142
143
144
Page 6 of 145

College of Architecture
Thesis Council
for AY 2016-2017
Ar. Froilan M. Fontecha, uap
D9 and D10 Coordinator
Thesis Council Chair
Ar. Clarissa Avendano, uap
Architectural Design Competition Coordinator
Ar. Rino Domingo Fernandez, fuap
Ar. Jonathan V. Manalad, uap
Design Cluster Chair
Ar. Willa Solomon, uap
TOA and HOA Coordinator
Like us on Facebook: @ArkiThesisCouncil and

@ArkiDesignCluster
Follow us on Twitter and Instagram:
@ThesisCouncil
Page 7 of 145
Advisers for the

Architecture Thesis Program
AY2016-2017
Ar. Rebecca Penafiel
5AR-1
Ar. Froilan Fontecha
5AR-2
Ar. Rino Domingo Fernandez
5AR-3
Ar. Clarissa Avendano
5AR-4
Ar. Tobias Bonaobra
5AR-5
Ar. John Joseph Fernandez
5AR-6
Ar. Manuel Maximo Noche
5AR-7
Ar. Willa Solomon
5AR-8
Ar. Leah Dela Rosa
5AR-9
Ar. Jonathan Manalad
5AR-10
Ar. Marlon Carino
5AR-11
Ar. Enrique Sta. Maria
5AR-12
Ar. Sylvia Clemente
5AR-13
Ar. Juanito Malaga
5AR-14
Ar. Demetrio Alcaraz
5AR-15
Ar. Ma. Vicenta Sanchez
5AR-16
Page 8 of 145
Thesis Adviser Information

Advisers Name:
Contact Information:
Email Address:
Other Contact Information:
Consultation Schedule:
Page 9 of 145
Architectural Design 9 Calendar

For AY2016-2017
Weeks
Inclusive Dates
Activities
9 - 13 August 2016
Opening of School Year 2016-2017

Course Orientation, Consultation Policies, Grading System, etc.
Individual Consultation: Development of RMA Proposal to Thesis Proposal
15 - 20 August
Individual Consultation: CHAPTERS I, II, and III (Introduction, Review of

Related Literature, and Research Methodology)
Thesis Forum: Saturday 20 August
22 - 27 August
Individual Consultation: CHAPTER IV (Site Profile & Analysis)
29 Aug - 3 September
SUBMISSION OF THESIS PROPOSALS

Individual Consultation: CHAPTER V (Project Profile & Analysis)
5 - 10 September
Individual Consultation: CHAPTER VI (Technical Data Presentation)
12 - 17 September
Individual Consultation: CHAPTER VII (Design Focus)
19 - 24 September
Individual Consultation: CHAPTER VIII (Space Programming and Analysis)

Thesis Forum: Saturday 24 September
26 Sept - 1 October
Individual Consultation: CHAPTER IX (Conceptual Development)
3 - 8 October
Preliminary Examination Week
10
10 - 15 October
ADVISERS REVIEW OF THESIS BOOK: PRELIMINARY DRAFT

Individual Consultation: SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN
11
17 - 22 October
Individual Consultation: FLOOR PLANS
12
24 - 29 October
Individual Consultation: ELEVATIONS & SECTIONS
13
31 Oct - 5 November
Refinement of Thesis Book

Thesis Forum: Saturday 5 November
14
7 - 12 November
Individual Consultation: ARCHITECTURAL BAY SECTION, DETAILS, and

DESIGN FOCUS
15
14 - 19 November
Individual Consultation: STRUCTURAL CONCEPT AND DETAILS
16
21 - 26 November
Individual Consultation: ARCHITECTURAL DETAILS: UTILITIES
17
28 Nov - 3 December
Individual Consultation: EXTERIOR AND INTERIOR ARCHITECTURE

PERSPECTIVE(S)
18
5 - 10 December
ADVISERS COURSE ASSESSMENT: THESIS BOOK PREFINAL DRAFT

PRELIMINARY ARCHITECTURAL DRAWINGS
19
12 - 17 December
Final Examination Week
Page 10 of 145
Student Guidelines for the

Development and Implementation of the
Architecture Thesis Program:
Architectural Design 9
Background
The Architecture Thesis Program is composed of three parts, namely: Research Methods in
Architecture (RMA), Design 9 (AD9) and Design 10 (AD10). At the end of the AD9 course,
the students should be able:
To have undertaken a thorough research of an architectural problem (encompassing

design and planning, sustainability, history and theory, laws, building technology and
systems, and building materials) which is of their own chosen topic;
To synthesize gathered information and translate into a viable design solution; and
To compile and submit research material into an approved thesis book together with
schematic designs suggesting the injection of a new and innovative thought in the
approach to the design solution.
This compilation should be submitted in a manner befitting the work of an architecture
student in his final year.
Architectural Design 9 (AD9) is the formation of design research as the foundation for the
creation of a design solution.
It is based on the premise that the student has completed and passed all the requirements of
RMA and that the RMA proposal, which is its final output, has been reviewed by the RMA
Adviser and can be further developed into a thesis proposal.
1.0
Scope of Work. The scope of work for AD9 includes the following:
2.0
Submission of a thesis proposal with subsequent approval by the College Dean;

Submission of the unbounded pre-final Thesis Book;
Satisfactory compliance of all the requirements of the Architectural Thesis
Logbook covering AD9; and
Completion of the projects preliminary drawings.
Expected Output. This listing represents the minimum output that shall be
submitted in the AD9 Thesis Proposal and Thesis Book. Students are expected to
proofread and edit their proposals and theses books for grammar, spelling, syntax,
and citation style prior to any submission. Students shall, at all times, follow the
Page 11 of 145
Universitys Code of Conduct and Discipline and shall refrain plagiarism and other
forms of dishonesty in thesis writing.
2.1
The Thesis Proposal helps you focus your project before you begin the work.
It is essential to narrow the project topic to a manageable size. Students who
take on a project that is too large in scope always struggle to finish on time.
The proposal does not wholly reflect finished work as some aspects of your
thesis may change as you complete the project.
The proposal shall serve as a contract or plan-of-action for your thesis.
The Thesis Proposal consists of the following:
2.2
The Thesis Book: Pre-Final Report consists of the following:
3.0
Cover page;
Letter of Proposal to be signed by the student and endorsed by the Thesis
Adviser; to be recommended by the Thesis Council and approved by the
Dean;
Certificate to Proceed to be signed by the Dean;
Contents, List of Figures, and List of Tables;
Chapter I Introduction;
Chapter II Review of Related Literature;
Chapter III Research Methodology;
Chapter IV Site Selection; and
References.
Cover page;
Signed Letter of Proposal;
Signed Certificate to Proceed;
Contents, List of Figures, and List of Tables;
Abstract;
Chapter I Introduction;
Chapter II Review of Related Literature;
Chapter III Research Methodology;
Chapter IV Site Profile and Analysis;
Chapter V Project Profile and Analysis;
Chapter VI Technical Research Data Presentation;
Chapter VII Design Focus;
Chapter VIII Space Programming and Analysis;
Chapter IX Conceptual Development;
References; and
Appendices.
Architectural Thesis Logbook. The Logbook contains a calendar of all AD9 (and
AD10) activities including checklists, policies and guidelines as well as
documentation forms (attendance to thesis forum and weekly consultation with the
Adviser) that shall aid the student during the entire thesis program. Students are
required to bring the logbook at all times, especially during consultations with the
Adviser for proper monitoring of the performance of the student.
Page 12 of 145
Students are expected to diligently take down notes during consultation. Make sure
that the Adviser reviews and signs after every scheduled consultation.
4.0
Thesis Proposal and Book Format. The body of both Thesis Proposal and Thesis
Book shall conform to the prescribed format: typewritten on A4 size bond paper with
1.5-inch on top and 1.0-inch on all other sides, left justified, double-spaced line
spacing using 12 pt Times New Roman, title on every upper left corner, and page
number on every upper right corner.
5.0
AD9 Thesis Adviser. The Adviser is a registered architect and holding a masters
degree or higher. Advisers are members of the faculty and are held to the same
responsibilities and standards. Their professional and academic qualifications
enable Advisers to critically review the thesis being proposed.
Advisers can give valuable input at the earliest stages of proposal development as
RMA Advisers. Once the student reaches Architectural Design 9, the Adviser shall be
responsible for meeting with the student once a week and shall maintain this
schedule throughout the thesis program.
The Thesis Adviser is involved in helping the student maintain the goal and manage
the process of their thesis. In the thesis program, the student plays the role of the
principal architect on a large architectural commission, while the Advisers role is one
of senior colleague offering advice and guidance. It demands patience, commitment,
and persistence.
The Adviser-Advisee relationship shall be nurtured during the subsequent phases of
the thesis program. The Adviser shall have the time and ability to communicate oneon-one and in a group format. The Adviser should be familiar with the specific thesis
research milestones and must ensure that the student prepares for these. Advisers
objectivity, judgment, and encouragement are essential to maintain the goals and
parameters that the thesis research requires.
Other duties and responsibilities of the AD9 Thesis Adviser are as follows:
Guides the student during the preparation of the thesis proposal, discusses their
choice of topic and site;
Signs the thesis proposal letter prepared by the student;
Endorses the thesis proposal to the Thesis Council for recommendation and
approval;
Provides directions and leads to the students thesis research;
Meets regularly with the student to evaluate the weekly progress of his/her
research, to discuss the problems that inevitably arise, and to provide whatever
encouragement and direction that proves necessary;
Reviews the student's thesis book preliminary draft;
Reviews the students preliminary drawings and thesis book pre-final draft at the
end of the AD9 course;
Gives the students AD9 course grade on the basis of the completeness of work,
quality of work, consultation duties, and maturity and attitude;
Evaluates the students performance after every individual consultation.
Page 13 of 145
6.0
Consultation with Other Faculty Members. Consultations with other UST College
of Architecture professors and/or other private individuals shall be at the students
discretion, however, this will not have any bearing on the Advisers assessment of the
students AD9 course performance.
7.0
Thesis Forums. The Thesis is a comprehensive project that requires integration of

many knowledge bases. Thus, the Thesis Council organizes a series of thesis
forums where students listen and interact as architects and others field specialists
talk about a wide range of topics such as sustainability, building systems, building
types, thesis preparation, etc.
There shall be about six thesis forums throughout the thesis program. Attendance to
all is required.
8.0
Pre-Final Draft Thesis Book Evaluation. The Adviser shall evaluate the extent of
the students compliance to all the requirements of the Thesis Book outline (as
indicated in Section 2.2) as to its quality and completeness. If the Adviser finds the
students work satisfactory, the Adviser then signs the Certificate of Completion at
the end of the AD9 course program. The AD9 Final Evaluation Sheet shall serve as
the Advisers guide when determining the students final AD9 grade.
9.0
Preliminary Drawings. All plans, elevations, sections, etc. presented during AD9
shall be mechanically drawn. Computer aided drawings shall not be allowed.
10.0
AD9 Policies
10.1
Advisers Grading Criteria. The Students grade for AD9 shall be based on
the following criteria as evaluated by the Adviser:
Completeness of the Thesis Book

Quality of Research / Study
Adherence to Consultation Duties
Maturity and Attitude
30%
40%
25%
5%
10.2
Absences. The core of AD9 is based on the students diligent consultation

and constant update of his/her progress with the Adviser. Hence, failure to
regularly consult (following the University Policy on Attendance) with the
Adviser shall result to a grade of F.A. or Failure due to absences.
10.3
University Code of Conduct and Discipline. (UST Student Handbook

2005-2006). As a matter of USTs University policy, the following are excerpts
from the guidelines which thesis students should be reminded of:
Courtesy. Courtesy is a sign of maturity. Its observance creates a climate of
goodwill and fellowship. Thomasian students must, at all times, be courteous
and respectful of others. Any act of disrespect, either in words or in deeds,
done toward University authorities, faculty members, employees, fellow
students and visitors constitute an un-Christian behavior; likewise the
Page 14 of 145
unreasonable refusal to comply with lawful orders of University authorities

and/or their agents constitute an un-Christian behavior.
Thomasian students, who impede, obstruct, prevent or defeat the right and
obligation of a teacher or professor to teach his/her subject, or the right to
attend his/her classes or any official activity shall be subject to disciplinary
action.
Honesty. The University, in accordance with its Catholic teachings, puts a
high premium on the practice of honesty. Consequently, any act of dishonesty
should be avoided. The following are considered acts of dishonesty:
Forging, altering and/or misusing of University documents, records,

credentials or effects;
Printing and disseminating false information to or about the University;
Cheating in examinations, projects, homework, and/or other schoolworks;
Plagiarizing; and
Similar situations.
Diligence. A Thomasian student gives honor to his family and to the

University by being diligent in his studies. He/She should have a natural thirst
for knowledge and view his/her attendance in the University as an opportunity
to learn and improve himself/herself. Thus, a student must be
Punctual;
Present in his/her classes and participate in school-sanctioned activities;
and
Prepared for his lessons, homeworks, and examinations.
Good Grooming.
Decency and Modesty in Action. A Thomasian student must, at all times,act
with proper decorum and etiquette.
Page 15 of 145
Recognition &
Acknowledgment of
Architectural Design 9 Policies
Original / Student Copy
I, __________________________________________ hereby acknowledge that I have

carefully read and understood all the provisions of the Architectural Design 9 (AD9)
Guidelines as detailed in the Architectural Thesis Logbook.
I further acknowledge that I am now tasked to proceed with my research work in

accordance with the existing guidelines and policies of the University of Santo Tomas
College of Architecture. I am likewise required to submit the said research work on the
time and date designated by the Thesis Adviser this term.
It is understood that my compliance to all of the provisions specified herein shall be the
basis of my Advisers assessment of my performance in accordance to all existing
grading and evaluation policies of the College and of the University.
Conforme:
Date:
_______________________________________
_____________________
Students Name and Signature
Page 16 of 145
Cut here
Recognition &
Acknowledgment of
Duplicate / Adviser Copy

I further acknowledge that I am now tasked to proceed with my research work in

accordance with the existing guidelines and policies of the University of Santo Tomas
College of Architecture. I am likewise required to submit the said research work on the
time and date designated by the Thesis Adviser this term.
Conforme:
Date:
_______________________________________
_____________________
Note to the Student: Kindly detach this duplicate copy and submit to your Adviser on your first consultation meeting.
Note to the Adviser: Kindly collect and compile in a short brown envelope and submit to the Thesis Coordinator on
the date of submission of the Thesis Proposal. Thank you.
Page 17 of 145
PRE-CONSULTATION NOTES
Week 1, 8-13 August 2016

Development of RMA Proposal into Thesis Proposal
Fill this section before meeting your Adviser
Name
Section
Proposed Thesis Title
Proposed Site
What are the issues and concerns that I shall ask my Thesis Adviser?
Page 18 of 145
AD9 INDIVIDUAL CONSULTATION SUMMARY

This section shall be filled out by the Thesis student during consultation.
1. What are my Advisers comments on my output today?
2. What should I accomplish in time for the next scheduled thesis consultation?
3. When is my next scheduled consultation?
Post consultation evaluation (To be filled up by the Thesis Adviser)

Poor
Below
Expectation
Satisfactory
Above
Expectation
Excellent
Student actively contributed to the discussion with personal

insights and viable alternatives
Student came for consultation prepared with discussion points
and accomplishing last meetings to-do list.
Student arrived for consultation, and on time.
Student exhibited interest and diligence by taking notes of the
consultation proceedings
Signed:
________________________________________________
Advisers signature over printed name
Page 19 of 145
Cut here
Name
Date


Poor
Below
Expectation
Satisfactory
Above
Expectation
Excellent

Signed:
________________________________________________
Note to the Adviser: Kindly collect and compile in a short brown envelope to be used as future reference for the students AD9 final assessment.
Page 20 of 145

Chapters I, II, and III (Introduction, Review of Related Literature, and Research Methodology)
Name
Section
Proposed Site
Page 21 of 145


Poor
Below
Expectation
Satisfactory
Above
Expectation
Excellent

Signed:
________________________________________________
Page 22 of 145
Cut here
Name
Date


Poor
Below
Expectation
Satisfactory
Above
Expectation
Excellent

Signed:
________________________________________________
Page 23 of 145

Chapter IV Site Profile and Analysis
Name
Section
Proposed Site
Page 24 of 145

Post consultation evaluation (To be filled out by the Thesis Adviser)

Poor
Below
Expectation
Satisfactory
Above
Expectation
Excellent

Signed:
________________________________________________
Page 25 of 145
Cut here
Name
Date


Poor
Below
Expectation
Satisfactory
Above
Expectation
Excellent

Signed:
________________________________________________
Page 26 of 145
REVIEW CHECKLIST
ARCHITECTURE
THESIS PROPOSAL
Go over this checklist to determine if your proposal complies with the standards on form and
content as set by the Thesis Council.
Front cover in clear A4 clear acetate
Back cover in color-assigned A4 paper
Clip binding
Cover page follows template format
Single page Letter of Proposal follows template format and is signed by the student
Certificate to Proceed follows template format
Contents, List of Figures, and List of Tables follow template format
Chapters I to IV are typewritten on A4-size bond paper with 1.5-inch on top and 1.0-inch
margin on all other sides, left justified, double-spaced line spacing using 12 pt. Times
New Roman. Within the top margin is the title on the upper left corner of every page, and
page number on upper right corner.
Chapter I Introduction contains Background and Nature of the Project, Statement of the
Problem, Project Goal and Objectives, Significance of the Project, Scope and Limitations,
Acronyms and Abbreviations, Definition of Terms.
Chapter II Review of Related Literature contains fifteen (15) project-related topics; each
topic is discussed citing at least five (5) authors/researchers; follows APA citation style;
journals and news articles must not be more than five (5) years old; books must not be
more than ten (10) years old.
Chapter III Research Methodology contains Research Design and Research Tools/
Instruments
Chapter IV Site Selection contains (for proposals with site selection options) Criteria
for Site Selection, Description and Vicinity Map of Selected Sites, Site Selection
Evaluation, Selected Site Description and Justification; (for proposals with identified
sites) Vicinity Map, Lot Plan, Site Criteria, Site Description and Justification; SWOT
(Strength, Weaknesses, Opportunities and Threats)
References: follows the APA Style.
THESIS PROPOSAL EVALUATION and THESIS PROPOSAL RUBRIC detached and
filled out.
Page 27 of 145
Cut here
THESIS PROPOSAL EVALUATION

Kindly fill out, detach and submit with your proposal.
To be filled out by the Thesis student
Name
Section
Proposed Site
Adviser
Date Submitted
To be filled out by the Thesis Council representative
The Thesis Proposal has been reviewed by the Thesis Council and the following action was taken.
PROPOSAL RECOMMENDED FOR DEANS APPROVAL

PROPOSAL RECOMMENDED FOR APPROVAL WITH COMMENTS
See comments below.
INCOMPLETE / ADDENDUM REQUIRED

Additional work must be submitted in the form of a written addendum to be endorsed by your
Adviser and approved by the Thesis Council.
RE-SUBMITTAL REQUIRED
Complete and submit a new proposal to the Thesis Council for review. See comments below
General Comments.
_________________________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________________________
Signed:
________________________________________________
Thesis Council Representative signature over printed name
Page 28 of 145
Cut here
Name
Date
THESIS PROPOSAL RUBRIC

Kindly fill out, detach and submit with your proposal.
To be filled out by the Thesis Council representative
Proposal must merit a rating no lower than 3 (Satisfactory) in each criterion to be accepted by the Thesis Council for the Deans approval.
Criteria
Undeveloped
1
Developing
2
Satisfactory
3
Outstanding
4
Project
Background
Provides insufficient, unrelated, and/

or too broad background information
about the research topic.
Provides sufficient and relevant

background information about the
research proposal for an informed
reader who is not familiar with the
specific topic.
Statement of
the Problem
Inaccurately and inadequately

identifies and summarizes research
question/issue.
Accurately and adequately identifies

and summarizes research question/
issue.
Thesis problem statement lacks

connection to appropriate
organizational, community, national,
or global issue.
Thesis problem statement clearly

connects to appropriate
organizational, community, national,
or global issue.
Project Goal
and
Objectives
Goal and objectives are vague or

incomplete; objectives are neither
specific, measurable, assignable,
realistic nor time-bound; they are not
arranged by level of importance.
Goal and objectives are clear;

objectives are either specific,
measurable, assignable, realistic or
time-bound; and are arranged by
level of importance.
Significance
of the Project
Inadequately describes how the

project will contribute to cultural,
social, economic, educational,
environmental, political, or spiritual
development if the goal and
objectives of the project/study are
achieved
Clearly describes how the project will

contribute to cultural, social,
economic, educational,
environmental, political, or spiritual
development if the goal and
objectives of the project/study are
achieved
Scope and
Limitations
Stated scope is too big, making the

research and project difficult to
complete within the timeframe.
Coverage of the research study and
project is not explicitly stated.
Stated scope is doable within the

timeframe of the thesis program.
Coverage of the research study and
project is clearly stated and
sufficient.
Constraints or limiting factors that

might affect research and final output
are not stated or unreasonable.
Constraints or limiting factors that

might affect research and final output
are stated and reasonable.
Definition of
Terms
Pertinent terms are not operationally

defined for an informed reader who
is not familiar with the specific topic.
Pertinent terms are operationally

defined for an informed reader who
is not familiar with the specific topic.
Research
Methodology
Proposed methodology/approach is
missing or inadequate in meeting the
objectives of the study/project.
Proposed methodology/approach is
adequate in meeting the objectives
of the study/project.
No research instruments/tools were

attached.
Research instruments/tools were

attached.
Site Selection
Site is not sufficiently justified to be

suited for the proposed project.
Site is sufficiently justified to be

suited for the proposed project.
References
Sources are not cited or not cited

correctly. References are very
limited and or old.
Sources are cited and cited correctly.

Resources are varied and current.
General
Format
The prescribed thesis format is not

followed. Writing needs
improvement with numerous typos
and grammatical errors.
The prescribed thesis format is

followed.
Research is nicely written.
Sentences have very few typo and
grammatical errors.
Rating
Comments
Page 29 of 145
Week 4, 29 August - 3 September 2016

Chapter V Project Profile and Analysis
Name
Section
Proposed Site
Page 30 of 145


Poor
Below
Expectation
Satisfactory
Above
Expectation
Excellent

Signed:
________________________________________________
Page 31 of 145
Cut here
Name
Date


Poor
Below
Expectation
Satisfactory
Above
Expectation
Excellent

Signed:
________________________________________________
Page 32 of 145
Week 5, 5-10 September 2016

Chapter VI Technical Research Data Presentation
Name
Section
Proposed Site
Page 33 of 145


Poor
Below
Expectation
Satisfactory
Above
Expectation
Excellent

Signed:
________________________________________________
Page 34 of 145
Cut here
Name
Date


Poor
Below
Expectation
Satisfactory
Above
Expectation
Excellent

Signed:
________________________________________________
Page 35 of 145

Chapter VII Design Focus
Name
Section
Proposed Site
Page 36 of 145


Poor
Below
Expectation
Satisfactory
Above
Expectation
Excellent

Signed:
________________________________________________
Page 37 of 145
Cut here
Name
Date


Poor
Below
Expectation
Satisfactory
Above
Expectation
Excellent

Signed:
________________________________________________
Page 38 of 145

Chapter VIII Space Programming and Analysis
Name
Section
Proposed Site
Page 39 of 145


Poor
Below
Expectation
Satisfactory
Above
Expectation
Excellent

Signed:
________________________________________________
Page 40 of 145
Cut here
Name
Date


Poor
Below
Expectation
Satisfactory
Above
Expectation
Excellent

Signed:
________________________________________________
Page 41 of 145
Week 8, 26 September - 1 October 2016

Chapter IX Conceptual Development
Name
Section
Proposed Site
Page 42 of 145


Poor
Below
Expectation
Satisfactory
Above
Expectation
Excellent

Signed:
________________________________________________
.
Page 43 of 145
Cut here
Name
Date


Poor
Below
Expectation
Satisfactory
Above
Expectation
Excellent

Signed:
________________________________________________
Page 44 of 145
REVIEW CHECKLIST
THESIS BOOK
PRELIMINARY DRAFT REPORT
Go over this checklist to determine if your thesis preliminary draft complies with the standards on
form and content as set by the Thesis Council.
Clip binding
Chapter II Review of Related Literature contains fifteen (15) topics; each topic is
discussed citing at least five (5) authors/researchers; follows APA citation style; journals
and news articles must not be more than five (5) years old; books must not be more than
ten (10) years old.
Instruments
Chapter IV Site Profile and Analysis contains Site Criteria, Site Description, Site
Justification, Macro Site Profile, Micro Site Profile, Site Analysis, SWOT, with all
supporting figures (maps and photos) and tables.
Chapter V Project Profile and Analysis contains Market Study, Client Profile,
Organizational Chart of the Facility, User Profile, Sample Operational/Activity Schedule,
Legal Framework, and Project Analysis.
Chapter VI Technical Research Data Presentation contains Primary and Secondary/
Archival Research Data.
Chapter VII Design Focus contains Discussion of Design Focus, Applicability to the
Project, and Conclusion.
Chapter VIII Spatial Programming and Analysis contains List of Spatial Requirements,
Room Data Sheet, Summary of Area Requirements, Adjacency Matrix, and Bubble
Diagram.
Chapter IX Conceptual Development contains Design Objectives, Design Philosophy,
Design Concepts, Design Considerations, and Design Strategies.
References follows the APA Style.
Appendices are optional.
Page 45 of 145
Week 10, 10-15 October 2016

Site Development
Name
Section
Proposed Site
Page 46 of 145


Poor
Below
Expectation
Satisfactory
Above
Expectation
Excellent

Signed:
________________________________________________
Page 47 of 145
Cut here
Name
Date


Poor
Below
Expectation
Satisfactory
Above
Expectation
Excellent

Signed:
________________________________________________
Page 48 of 145

Floor Plans
Name
Section
Proposed Site
Page 49 of 145


Poor
Below
Expectation
Satisfactory
Above
Expectation
Excellent

Signed:
________________________________________________
.
Page 50 of 145
Cut here
Name
Date


Poor
Below
Expectation
Satisfactory
Above
Expectation
Excellent

Signed:
________________________________________________
Page 51 of 145

Elevations and Sections
Name
Section
Proposed Site
Page 52 of 145


Poor
Below
Expectation
Satisfactory
Above
Expectation
Excellent

Signed:
________________________________________________
Page 53 of 145
Cut here
Name
Date


Poor
Below
Expectation
Satisfactory
Above
Expectation
Excellent

Signed:
________________________________________________
Note to the Adviser: Kindly collect and compile in a short brown envelope to be used as future reference for the students AD9 final assessment..
Page 54 of 145
Week 14, 7-12 November 2016

Architectural Bay Section, Architectural Details, Design Focus
Name
Section
Proposed Site
Page 55 of 145


Poor
Below
Expectation
Satisfactory
Above
Expectation
Excellent

Signed:
________________________________________________
Page 56 of 145
Cut here
Name
Date


Poor
Below
Expectation
Satisfactory
Above
Expectation
Excellent

Signed:
________________________________________________
Note to the Adviser: Kindly collect and compile in a short brown envelope to be used as future reference for the students AD9 final assessment..
Page 57 of 145

Structural Concept and Structural Details
Name
Section
Proposed Site
Page 58 of 145


Poor
Below
Expectation
Satisfactory
Above
Expectation
Excellent

Signed:
________________________________________________
Page 59 of 145
Cut here
Name
Date


Poor
Below
Expectation
Satisfactory
Above
Expectation
Excellent

Signed:
________________________________________________
.
Page 60 of 145

Architectural Details: Utilities
Name
Section
Proposed Site
Page 61 of 145


Poor
Below
Expectation
Satisfactory
Above
Expectation
Excellent

Signed:
________________________________________________
.
Page 62 of 145
Cut here
Name
Date


Poor
Below
Expectation
Satisfactory
Above
Expectation
Excellent

Signed:
________________________________________________
Page 63 of 145
Week 17, 28 November - 3 December 2016

Exterior and Interior Architecture Perspectives
Name
Section
Proposed Site
Page 64 of 145


Poor
Below
Expectation
Satisfactory
Above
Expectation
Excellent

Signed:
________________________________________________
.
Page 65 of 145
Cut here
Name
Date


Poor
Below
Expectation
Satisfactory
Above
Expectation
Excellent

Signed:
________________________________________________
Note to the Adviser: Kindly collect and compile in a short brown envelope to be used as future reference for the students AD9 final assessment
Page 66 of 145
Week 18, 5-10 December 2016

Name
Section
Proposed Site
Page 67 of 145


Poor
Below
Expectation
Satisfactory
Above
Expectation
Excellent

Signed:
________________________________________________
Page 68 of 145
Cut here
Name
Section


Poor
Below
Expectation
Satisfactory
Above
Expectation
Excellent

Signed:
________________________________________________
Note to the Adviser: Kindly collect and compile in a short brown envelope to be used as future reference for the students AD9 final assessment
Page 69 of 145
REVIEW CHECKLIST
THESIS BOOK: PRE-FINAL REPORT

Go over this checklist to determine if your thesis pre-final draft complies with the standards on
form and content as set by the Thesis Council.
Clip binding
Single page Abstract follows template format with name, title, body, and keywords
Chapter II Review of Related Literature contains fifteen (15) topics; each topic is
discussed citing at least five (5) authors/researchers; follows APA citation style; journals
and news articles must not be more than five (5) years old; books must not be more than
ten (10) years old.
Instruments
Chapter IV Site Profile and Analysis contains Site Criteria, Site Description, Site
Justification, Macro Site Profile, Micro Site Profile, Site Analysis, SWOT, with all
supporting figures (maps and photos) and tables.
Chapter V Project Profile and Analysis contains Market Study, Client Profile,
Organizational Chart of the Facility, User Profile, Sample Operational/Activity Schedule,
Legal Framework, and Project Analysis.
Chapter VI Technical Research Data Presentation contains Primary and Secondary/
Archival Research Data.
Chapter VII Design Focus contains Discussion of Design Focus, Applicability to the
Project, and Conclusion.
Chapter VIII Spatial Programming and Analysis contains List of Spatial Requirements,
Room Data Sheet, Summary of Area Requirements, Adjacency Matrix, and Bubble
Diagram.
Chapter IX Conceptual Development contains Design Objectives, Design Philosophy,
Design Concepts, Design Considerations, and Design Strategies.
References follows the APA Style.
Appendices
Page 70 of 145
AD9 FINAL EVALUATION SHEET

To the Thesis Adviser: Kindly fill out the necessary information below to serve as a thorough assessment of the
students performance for the AD9 course. Thank you.
A.
Is the work complete? Please grade each corresponding box if the student has the following chapters in his/
her output. This will constitute 30% of the students grade.
Content
Maximum %
Chapter I
Introduction
Chapter II
Review of Related Literature
Chapter III
Research Methodology
Chapter IV
Site Profile and Analysis
Chapter V
Project Profile and Analysis
Chapter VI
Research Data Presentation
Chapter VII
Design Focus
Chapter VIII
Space Programming and Analysis
Chapter IX
Conceptual Development
Grade
SUBTOTAL FOR A OUT OF 30%
B. Is the thesis book of good quality? Please evaluate the overall output of the student using the following
evaluation matrix. This will constitute 40% of the students grade.
Fail
Pass
Fair
Good
Very
Good
Excellent
18.2
19.9
21.1
22.8
24.2
26.0
Grammar and Style (12.5%): Grammar or spelling;

clarity and consistency of writers writing style;
cohesiveness of sentences and paragraphs.
3.5
3.8
4.0
4.4
4.6
5.0
Citations (10%): Adequacy and appropriateness of

citation of sources, conformity of citations and references
to APA style.
2.8
3.1
3.2
3.5
3.7
4.0
Organization (12.5%): Organization and structure (there

is a clear beginning, a body, and a good direction leading
to a conclusion); judicious use of subheadings to clarify
components of the text; organization of research in a way
that is logical, clear, easy to follow, and flows smoothly;
use of introductions making each chapter interesting to
read.
3.5
3.8
4.0
4.4
4.6
5.0
Grading Criteria
Content (65%): Clarity of statement of main idea;
adequacy of discussion of topics; contribution of
additional thought and not just a mere summarization of
data or publication.
SUBTOTAL FOR B OUT OF 40%
Page 71 of 145
Cut here
Name
Date
AD9 FINAL EVALUATION SHEET

To the Thesis Adviser: Kindly fill out the necessary information below to serve as a thorough assessment of the
A.
Is the work complete? Please grade each corresponding box if the student has the following chapters in his/
her output. This will constitute 30% of the students grade.
Content
Maximum %
Chapter I
Introduction
Chapter II
Review of Related Literature
Chapter III
Research Methodology
Chapter IV
Site Profile and Analysis
Chapter V
Project Profile and Analysis
Chapter VI
Research Data Presentation
Chapter VII
Design Focus
Chapter VIII
Space Programming and Analysis
Chapter IX
Conceptual Development
Grade
B. Is the thesis book of good quality? Please evaluate the overall output of the student using the following
evaluation matrix. This will constitute 40% of the students grade.
Fail
Pass
Fair
Good
Very
Good
Excellent
18.2
19.9
21.1
22.8
24.2
26.0
Grammar and Style (12.5%): Grammar or spelling;

clarity and consistency of writers writing style;
cohesiveness of sentences and paragraphs.
3.5
3.8
4.0
4.4
4.6
5.0
Citations (10%): Adequacy and appropriateness of

citation of sources, conformity of citations and references
to APA style.
2.8
3.1
3.2
3.5
3.7
4.0
Organization (12.5%): Organization and structure (there

is a clear beginning, a body, and a good direction leading
to a conclusion); judicious use of subheadings to clarify
components of the text; organization of research in a way
that is logical, clear, easy to follow, and flows smoothly;
use of introductions making each chapter interesting to
read.
3.5
3.8
4.0
4.4
4.6
5.0
Grading Criteria
Content (65%): Clarity of statement of main idea;
adequacy of discussion of topics; contribution of
additional thought and not just a mere summarization of
data or publication.
Page 72 of 145
C. Did the student adhere to his/her consultation duties? Please evaluate the overall output of the student using
the following evaluation matrix. This will constitute 25% of the students grade.
Grading Criteria
Fail
Pass
Fair
Good
Very Good
Excellent
Comes to consultation prepared (50%)
8.8
9.6
10.1
10.9
11.6
12.5
Contributes to the discussion by providing

personal design / research insights (30%)
5.2
5.7
6.1
6.6
7.0
7.5
Attends consultation regularly and

punctually (20%)
3.5
3.8
4.0
4.4
4.6
5.0
SUBTOTAL FOR C OUT OF 25%
D. Does the student display maturity and the right deportment during this semester? Please evaluate the overall
output of the student using the following evaluation matrix. This will constitute 5% of the students grade.
Grading Criteria
Level of Maturity and Deportment (100%)
Fail
Pass
Fair
Good
Very Good
Excellent
3.5
3.8
4.0
4.4
4.6
5.0
SUBTOTAL FOR D OUT OF 5%
Further comments:
SUMMARY
Criteria
Output Grade
Completeness of Work
30%
Quality of Work
40%
Consultation Duties
25%
5%
FINAL AD9 GRADE A+B+C+D
The students work for AD9 was evaluated by the Adviser and the following action was taken.
PASS
FAIL
Graded by:
Date:
_______________________________________
_____________________
Advisers Name and Signature
Page 73 of 145
Cut here
Name
Date
Grading Criteria
Fail
Pass
Fair
Good
Very Good
Excellent
8.8
9.6
10.1
10.9
11.6
12.5

5.2
5.7
6.1
6.6
7.0
7.5

punctually (20%)
3.5
3.8
4.0
4.4
4.6
5.0
D. Does the student display maturity and the right deportment during this semester? Please evaluate the overall
Grading Criteria
Fail
Pass
Fair
Good
Very Good
Excellent
3.5
3.8
4.0
4.4
4.6
5.0
Further comments:
SUMMARY
Criteria
Output Grade
30%
Quality of Work
40%
Consultation Duties
25%
5%
The students work for AD9 was evaluated by the Adviser and the following action was taken.
PASS
FAIL
Graded by:
Date:
_______________________________________
_____________________
Page 74 of 145

Espana, Manila
THESIS PROGRAM
Certificate of AD9 Completion

This Certificate is hereby given to ___________________________________________

whose thesis entitled _____________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________
has been carefully evaluated and endorsed by the undersigned Thesis Adviser and has
subsequently been reviewed and approved by the Office of the Dean.
This further certifies that the student has successfully completed all the requirements of
the Architectural Design 9 course and is now eligible to proceed to Architectural Design
10 course.
This Certificate of Completion is issued on ________________________.
_______________________________________
Thesis Adviser
Page 75 of 145
Cut here

Espana, Manila
THESIS PROGRAM
Certificate of AD9 Completion

Duplicate / Adviser File Copy

______________________________________________________________________
has been carefully evaluated and endorsed by the undersigned Thesis Adviser and has
subsequently been reviewed and approved by the Office of the Dean.
This further certifies that the student has successfully completed all the requirements of
the Architectural Design 9 course and is now eligible to proceed to Architectural Design
10 course.
This Certificate of Completion is issued on ________________________.
_______________________________________
Thesis Adviser
Page 76 of 145
Congratulations!
You have hurdled the first of two parts of
the Architectural Thesis program. You
are now instructed to enhance your work
upon the recommendations of your
Adviser.
You are likewise expected to finalize
your schematic drawings which are
required for the second part of this
academic exercise.
Page 77 of 145
Architectural Design 10 Calendar

For AY2016-2017
Weeks
Inclusive Dates
Activities
16 - 21 January 2017
Start of Second Term

Course Orientation, Consultation Policies and Scheduling, Endorsements /
Thesis Deliberation / Grading System, etc.
Individual Consultation: Drawings for Preliminary Endorsement
23 - 28 January
30 Jan - 4 February

Thesis Forum
6 - 11 February
PRELIMINARY ENDORSEMENT (ADVISER)
13 - 18 February
Individual Consultation: Drawings for Final Endorsement
20 - 25 February
27 Feb - March 4

Thesis Forum
6 - 11 March
13 - 18 March
Preliminary Exams Week
10
20 - 25 March
11
27 March - 1 April
FINAL ENDORSEMENT (THESIS COUNCIL)

Drawing of Lots
Thesis Forum: Meet the Jury
12
3 - 8 April
THESIS DEFENSE
13
10 - 15 April
Holy Week
14
17 - 22 April
15
24 - 29 April
16
1 - 6 May
17
8 - 13 May
Eccezionale 2017: The Outstanding Theses Exhibition

Judging for Thesis of the Year
18
15 - 20 May
Baccalaureate Celebration (May 19th)
19
22 - 27 May
20
29 May - 3 June
Final Exams For Graduating Students (Beginning 26 April)
Solemn Investitures
Page 78 of 145
Student Guidelines for the

Development and Implementation of the
Architecture Thesis Program:
Background
The Architecture Thesis Program is composed of three parts, namely: Research Methods in
Architecture (RMA), Design 9 (AD9) and Design 10 (AD10). At the end of the program, the
Student should be able to:
Propose a relevant, feasible, and creative architectural design solution to an existing

physical problem;
Apply the architectural design process in the development of their architectural design
solution; and
Present and defend their architectural solution to the best of their ability.
Design 10 is based on the premise that the student has completed and passed all the
requirements of Design 9 and that the Thesis Book, which is its final output, has been
endorsed by the AD9 Adviser to be substantially complete in content and correct in style.
This terminal Architectural Design course involves the implementation of the AD9 output and
preparation for Thesis oral defense.
1.0
Scope of Works. The scope of works for AD10 includes the final review and
approval of final Design Development Plans, production of final presentation
drawings, and defense of the chosen design solution before the Thesis Jury.
2.0
Presentation Drawing Options. The rationale in providing presentation options is

to allow every student the liberty on how to visually present his design solutions given
the varying expansiveness of each and every project. However, legibility of drawings
is the most important consideration in deciding which presentation option is to be
used. Students are advised to discuss with their Advisers on what presentation
option works best for their projects.
2.1
Option A:
2.1.1
Computer-processed drawings/renderings listed in Table 4.1 and

printed on either A3 or 15X20 papers; ring-bound. First copy shall
be colored while the second and third copies may be in black and
white. Indicate the numerical scale on all plans, elevations, sections,
and details.
2.1.2
2.1.3
2.2
Page 79 of 145
Executive Summary on either A3 or 15X20 sheets and included in

Section 2.1.1.
Powerpoint presentation of all items in Section 2.1.1 but with graphical
scale shown on all plans, elevations, sections, and details.
Option B:
2.2.1
Scanned and digitally-enhanced mechanically drafted or freehand

drawings/renderings listed in Table 4.1 and printed on either A3 or
15X20 sheets; ring-bound. First copy shall be colored while the
second and third copies may be in black and white. Indicate the
numerical scale on all plans, elevations, sections, and details.
2.2.2. Executive Summary on either A3 or 15X20 sheets included in 2.2.1.
2.2.3 Powerpoint presentation of all items in Section 2.2.1 but with graphical
scale shown on all plans, elevations, sections, and details.
2.3
Option C:
2.3.1
2.3.2
2.3.3
2.4
Option D:
2.4.1
2.4.2
2.4.3
2.5
Computer-processed drawings/renderings listed in Table 4.1 and

printed directly or printed & mounted on 30x40 boards. Indicate the
numerical scale on all plans, elevations, sections, and details.
Three (3) copies of all items in Section 2.3.1 printed in A4 and ringbound. First copy shall be colored while the second and third copies
may be in black and white. Indicate the graphical scale on all plans,
elevations, sections, and details.
Executive Summary printed in A4 papers and included in 2.3.2.
Scanned and digitally-enhanced mechanically drafted or freehand

drawings/renderings listed in Table 4.1 and printed on 30X40 boards.
Indicate the numerical scale on all plans, elevations, sections, and
details.
Three (3) copies of 2.4.1 printed in A4 and ring-bound. First copy
shall be colored while the second and third copies may be in black
and white. Indicate the graphical scale on all plans, elevations,
sections, and details.
Executive Summary printed in A4 papers included in Section 2.4.2.
Option E:
2.5.1
2.5.2
2.5.3
Mechanically drafted or freehand drawings/renderings listed in Table

4.1 and drawn directly on 30x40 boards.
Three (3) copies of 2.5.1 printed in A4 and ring-bound. First copy
shall be colored while the second and third copies may be in black
and white. Indicate the graphical scale on all plans, elevations,
sections, and details.
Executive Summary printed in A4 papers and included in Section
2.5.2.
Page 80 of 145
3.0
Executive Summary. The Executive Summary as mentioned in Sections 2.1.2,

2.2.2, 2.3.3, 2.4.3, and 2.5.3 is the written manuscript containing the following:
Thesis Title;
Background of the Project and Statement of the Problem;
Project Goal and Objectives;
Project Scope and Limitations;
Summarized Site Description and Site Analysis;
Design Concept and Philosophy;
Design Objectives, Considerations, and Strategies/Approach/Solutions.
4.0
Expected Drawing Output. Further to the aforementioned visual presentation

options, Table 4.1 presents the minimum outputs that have to be produced in Design
10 before the student is endorsed by the Thesis Council to have his Thesis project
presented and defended in front of the Thesis Jury. The minimum drawing
requirements and corresponding presentation specifications as prescribed in sections
2.1.1, 2.2.1, 2.3.1, 2.4.1, and 2.5.1 are likewise shown on the table.
5.0
Change of Thesis Title, Project Objectives, and/or Project Site. Thesis students
are allowed to have their thesis title, project objectives, and/or project site revised not
later than the Preliminary Endorsement. The following shall be submitted to the
Thesis Council, through the Thesis Adviser, for approval:
Change of Thesis Title:

Original copies of signed Letter of Proposal and Certificate to Proceed;
Request to Change Thesis Title; and
Approval to Change Thesis Title
Change of Project Objectives:

Original copy of signed Letter of Proposal;
Request to Revise Project Objectives; and
Approval to Change Project Objectives
Change of Project Site:

Request to Revise Project Site;
Vicinity Map of Proposed Site;
Site Justification; and
Approval to Change Project Site
Page 81 of 145
Table 4.1 MINIMUM DRAWING REQUIREMENTS FOR THESIS PRESENTATION

Requirements
Minimum Scale
Minimum Content
Concept Board
Project Background, Project Goal and Objectives, Design

Objectives, Design Considerations, Design Philosophy and
Concept, Site Analysis
Site Development Plan
Fully rendered and showing property line, building shade and

shadows, north orientation, vicinity map, circulation flow of
people and vehicles, site & building entrances and exits (public,
administrative, staff, service), roadways and curb, pathways and
open spaces, hardscapes and softscapes. Label all buildings,
parking and major public open spaces.
or
Scaled Model
Should the student choose to present a scaled model, the site

development plan is no longer necessary provided that the
scaled model shows the entire project development.
Floor Plans
Sections
Elevations
Architectural Bay
Section
Architectural Details
Students, upon
the
recommendation
of their respective
Advisers, decide
on the
presentation
scale of their
thesis drawings.
It shall be
emphasized,
however, that
legibility of
presentation
drawings is
important in a
successful thesis
presentation,
defense, and
deliberation.
Rooms shall be labeled within the spaces; use of legends for

room labels is not allowed. Furniture and fixture layouts must be
shown. Show gridlines and section line(s).
Two (2) sections for single structures; one (1) section of every
building for multiple structures. Label visible rooms and show
fixtures/furniture/equipment, ceiling, doors and windows.
Gridlines, NGL, finish floors, ceiling, and apex lines shall be
indicated.
Four (4) elevations for single structures; two (2) elevations of
every building for multiple structures. Rendered and showing
shade and shadows. Gridlines, NGL, finish floor, and apex lines
shall be indicated.
Show from the lowest to the topmost architectural space and/or
element. Show dimensions, gridlines, indicate levels, annotate
material specifications, and spot detail callouts.
This may be presented as a sectional perspective.
Minimum of five (5) unique/special details; at least one
architectural detail shall show the design focus. Details shall be
identified in the bay section through callouts. Annotated with
dimensions and material/finish specifications.
Structural Concept
Isometric drawing of all buildings or of a major structure and

shown with shade and shadows.
Structural Details
Minimum of five (5) details. Annotated with dimensions and

material specifications.
Architectural Details:
Utilities
Must show the reflected (i) ceiling and lighting layout, (ii) power
layout, and (iii) fire protection layout of a major architectural
interior; supplemented by an architectural interior perspective.
Exterior Perspective
Street-level view/perspective of each structure;

Additional aerial/ birds eye view of the whole development for
complexes. Rendered.
Interior Architecture
Perspective
At least one (1) perspective of a major architectural interior.

Rendered.
Page 82 of 145
6.0
AD10 Thesis Adviser. The Adviser is a registered architect and holding a masters
degree or higher. Advisers are members of the faculty and are held to the same
responsibilities and standards. Their professional and academic qualifications
enables Advisers to critically review the thesis being proposed.
Similar to the previous architectural design course, the D10 Adviser shall be
responsible for meeting with the student once a week and shall maintain this
schedule until the final endorsement.
The Thesis Adviser is involved in helping the student maintain the rigor and manage
the process of their thesis. In the Thesis program, the student plays the role of the
principal architect on a large architectural commission, while the Advisers role is one
of senior colleague offering advice and guidance. It demands patience, commitment,
and persistence.
Other duties and responsibilities of the AD10 Thesis Adviser are as follows:
7.0
Evaluates the students performance after every individual consultation.

Approves the students thesis work as substantial for preliminary endorsement
and certifies the readiness to proceed with the preparation of his thesis
documents for final endorsement by the Thesis Council.
Submits to the Thesis Council, the list of students names recommended for final
endorsement.
Gives the Advisers grade which corresponds to 30% of the Thesis Final Grade,
subject to conditions.
Submits to the Thesis Council an electronic (Excel) file of students and thesis
titles for the drawing of lots.
Discusses with his/her students the outcome of the deliberations.
Submits to the Thesis Council the compiled sheets (Advisers copies) from the
Logbook for filing and reference.
Endorsements
7.1
The Student must seek from his/her Thesis Adviser a PRELIMINARY

ENDORSEMENT to proceed with the Design 10 course between the fourth
(4th) and fifth (5th) week of the second term. This Preliminary Endorsement
shall be based on the submitted site development plan, floor plans, elevations
and sections, etc of the Project. The Adviser shall use the AD10 Preliminary
Endorsement Form and Matrix for this purpose.
7.2
The week prior to the start of the Thesis Deliberations, the Student must seek
a FINAL ENDORSEMENT from the Thesis Council. The basis of this Final
Endorsement shall be the accomplishment of 75% to 90% of all drawings
indicated in Table 4.1.
The following documents shall be submitted to the Thesis Council, through
the Thesis Adviser:
All drawings indicated in Table 4.1 compiled & printed in A3 (clip-bound);

AD10 Final Endorsement Matrix;
Page 83 of 145
AD10 Final Endorsement Form; and

Abstract.
The Thesis Council shall return these documents with the results of the final
endorsement to the student through their Advisers. All drawings shall be
returned to the Student affixed with signatures from a Thesis Council
representative. These signed drawings shall be included in the hard bound
Thesis Book as Chapter X: Design Solution.
8.0
Drawing of Lots. The Thesis Adviser shall submit to the Thesis Council an
electronic copy of all endorsed students and their thesis titles. An electronic lottery,
to be moderated by a Thesis Coordinator, shall be held and attended by a
representative from each thesis class. Thesis Advisers are likewise invited to witness
the draw.
Within the same day the Thesis Coordinator shall post within the College premises
the thesis deliberations schedule. Schedule shall be posted online as well.
9.0
Deliberation Guidelines
9.1
Sessions. There are two daily deliberation sessions. Morning sessions start
at 8:00AM while afternoon sessions start at 1:00PM.
Candidates scheduled for morning sessions shall register with the Thesis Day
Chair at the 2F Faculty Room Lounge on or before 7:30AM. Upon
registration, the Thesis Day Chair shall inform the Candidate both his
designated jury room and presentation sequence. Candidates are expected
to proceed to their jury room, for proper introduction, and remain until his turn
to present is called.
Candidates scheduled for afternoon sessions shall register with the Thesis
Day Chair on or before 12:30PM.
9.2
9.3
Deliberation Attire. The Candidate shall be in proper business attire during

the Thesis Deliberation. Proper business attire is:
For Male Candidates: corporate long sleeves shirt with tie, or business
suit, or Barong Tagalog
For Female Candidates: corporate dress, business suit, or corporate

Filipiniana
Deliberation Day Requirements. The Candidate shall hand over to the Thesis
Panel his/her:
Thesis Logbook;
Two (2) copies of Jury Final Grading Sheet detached from this logbook
Three (3) copies of the Individual Jurors Grading Sheet detached from
this logbook;
Page 84 of 145
All required drawings and documents, based on the Candidates

presentation option, as explained in Section 2.0; and
A hard-bound copy of the Thesis Book with the signed endorsed drawings
in Chapter X.
The thesis book, as the principal output in Design 9, shall be used as the
basis for design development in Design 10. The Thesis Jury, during the
proceedings, shall refer to, review, and verify its contents for completeness
and consistency between research and design solution. A Candidates thesis
project may lead to an unsuccessful defense should there be glaring
inconsistencies between thesis research and final design solution.
9.4
Thesis Jury. The Thesis jury or panel, all from the College of Architecture
faculty, is composed of a Chair and two (2) members.
9.5
Recording of Proceedings. The Candidate shall be permitted to record the

thesis presentation and defense proceedings by audio or video equipment.
However, the recording equipment shall be switched off and brought out of
the Jury Room before the Jury Deliberation.
9.6
Deliberation Schedule. The Candidate is given one hour to present and

defend the project. The given time shall be broken down as follows:
05 minutes setup;
15 minutes presentation;
30 minutes defense or question & answer; and
10 minutes Jury deliberation and announcement of Thesis grade.
9.7
Deliberation Policies
9.7.1
Before the presentation. Unless requested by the Candidate to be

otherwise, all deliberations shall be open to the public. Relatives and
guests may be invited to witness the proceedings.
The Candidates Thesis Adviser may be present during the
presentation and defense merely as an observer. He/she is prohibited
from doing any of the following: (i) answering for the Candidate, (ii)
commenting on Jury questions, and (iii) influencing the outcome of the
deliberation process.
Furthermore, other faculty members may observe and shall not have
any official role in the proceedings. They shall be prohibited from
commenting or questioning the work of the Candidate or conversing
with any jury member that may be construed as disrupting the
proceedings.
It shall be the responsibility of the Candidate to ensure that digital
files, software, hardware, and peripherals needed for his presentation
are working properly. In the event that an equipment is faulty, the
Thesis Chair may decide to skip that portion of the presentation and
Page 85 of 145
base the deliberation on the physical review of the Candidates printed

sheets or boards.
The individual Jurors grading sheets and Thesis Jury final grading
sheets shall be completely and legibly filled out by the Candidate (or
his assistant) before handing it over to the Jury.
9.7.2
During the presentation. While a Thesis Jury member may serve as

timekeeper, it is expected that the Candidate is self-aware that he
does not exceed the 15 minutes allotted for his presentation.
Students may assist the Candidate during his presentation and
defense. However, they shall be in their prescribed uniform.
The Thesis Chair reserves the right to discontinue the proceedings
should any of the following documents/materials is missing:
Thesis Logbook;
Filled up Jury Final Grading and Individual Jurors Grading Sheets;
Required drawings and documents, based on the Candidates
presentation option, as explained in Section 2.0; and
A hard-bound copy of the Thesis Book with the signed endorsed
drawings in Chapter X.
Should the Candidate have missing or incomplete presentation

drawings, the Chair shall make this known to the Candidate and other
Jury Members. The Chair shall, nonetheless, allow the Candidate to
continue with the presentation. However, this shall be taken into
consideration during the computation of the Candidates Thesis grade.
The signed final endorsement drawings contained in Chapter X of the
Thesis Book shall not be accepted as substitute.
9.7.3
During the defense. The Thesis Jury may ask the Candidate any
question that it deems relevant to the thesis project. The Candidate is
responsible for the correctness of answers to questions which are
within the scope of their Project. The Jury may refer to the thesis
book for the validity and consistency of the Candidates answers.
The Jury may, likewise, review the Candidates thesis logbook to
evaluate the Candidates diligence while working on his thesis project.
The Candidate shall maintain composure during the defense even
when confronted with difficult questions or when challenged by any
member of the Jury on particulars and details of their project. The
Candidate shall not have an antagonistic attitude before, during and
after the deliberation.
The Candidate shall not be questioned on the financial feasibility of
the Project. However, the Candidate may be asked questions on the
Page 86 of 145
socio-economic and environmental impacts that the Project may have

on the community and/or immediate surroundings.
The Jury shall not badger a Candidate and press on a point that has
been conceded. A Candidate shall not be antagonized or terrorized.
A Juror shall not monopolize the questions. The Jury Chair, acting as
the moderator, shall ensure that each member has an equal
opportunity to ask the Candidate.
Questions asked outside/beyond the scope of the Candidates work or
difficult questions which a Candidate successfully answer shall be
given additional points or merits.
9.7.4
During the grade deliberation and announcement of Thesis

grade. Once the Jury is through with their questions, the Candidate,
guests, and all other spectators shall leave the jury room to allow the
Jury to determine the outcome of the deliberation in private.
Individual Jurors Grade. Each member of the Thesis Panel shall
grade the work of the Candidate based on the following criteria as
shown in Table 9.1 and using the Individual Jurors Grading Sheet.
Table 9.1 THESIS DELIBERATION GRADING CRITERIA

Weight
Criteria
Successful evolution of the design concept and its substantial integration to the
design solution;
Successful integration of the project with existing and future conditions of the
site and its environs;
10.0%
7.5%
Successful production of a design solution that meets the desired thesis

objectives;
30.0%
Innovative building elevations resulting in building character that relates to the

design concept;
10.0%
Correct representation of longitudinal & cross sections and architectural bay

section; sensible selection & competent translation of architectural spot details;
7.5%
Creative choice of design focus leading to its successful and substantial

integration to the project;
5.0%
Appropriate choice of structural framework and sensible selection and

competent translation of structural details;
5.0%
Accurate representation of architectural (utilities) details;
7.5%
Competent translation of exterior & interior perspectives; and
7.5%
Overall creativity of presentation (visual and oral) and legibility of drawings.
10.0%
Output Grade
100%
Page 87 of 145
Each Jury Member shall award numerical grades on all portions/

categories of the Project. The grade scale is from 50 to 100, with 75
as the passing mark.
Rounding off the individual grade, jury average grade, or final thesis
grade shall not be allowed.
A Candidate shall have successfully defended his/her project if the
Thesis project merited passing grades from two or three Jury
Members.
Once the Thesis Jury has completed their deliberation, the Candidate
shall be called back inside the Jury Room. Standing in front of the
Thesis Jury, the Candidate shall affix his/her signature on the Final
Jury Grading Sheet, after which the Thesis Jury Chair shall read the
summary of the deliberation and the decision of the Thesis Jury.
The original copy of the Final Jury Grading Sheet shall be handed to
the Candidate unless he/she is instructed by the Thesis Jury to
undertake some retouches/revisions on the project.
9.7.5
Post-deliberation. The Candidate shall quickly collect his/her

presentation equipment, materials, thesis book and logbook to make
way for the next Candidate, except:
When the Candidate successfully defended his/her thesis with a

final grade of 1.0 (Excellent), the Candidate shall hand over to the
designated Thesis Day Chair the (i) thesis book and (ii) 30x40
boards or original A3 or 15x20 sheets;
When the Candidate unsuccessfully defended his/her thesis with a

final grade of 5.0 (Failed), the Candidate shall hand over to the
Thesis Jury Chair the (i) thesis book and (ii) 30x40 boards or
original A3 or 15x20 sheets.
The Thesis Jury may ask for copies of the 15x20, A3, or A4 reports
although the Candidate is not required to do so.
10.0
Successful Thesis Defense. The Candidate shall have successfully defended his/
her thesis project under the following circumstances and as shown on Figure 10.1:
10.1
When the thesis project, upon deliberation, receives a passing grade of 75

and above from all three Thesis Jurors, the Thesis final grade shall be derived
and computed as follows:
70.0% of Average Jury Grade
+ 30.0% of Thesis Adviser Grade
_________________________
100.0% Thesis Final Grade
Page 88 of 145
The Thesis Adviser, who has worked with the Candidate for a minimum of two
terms, will be allocated a thirty percent (30%) apportionment in the
computation of the thesis final grade. The basis of this grade will be relayed
to the Thesis Jury using the Thesis Grading Sheet: Adviser
10.2
When the thesis project, upon deliberation, receives a failing grade of 50 to

74 from one Thesis Juror, the Candidate shall automatically receive a Thesis
final grade of 3.00 (Passed). The Thesis Advisers grade is disregarded.
10.3
When the thesis project, upon deliberation, receives a failing grade of 50 to

74 from two or three Thesis Jurors, the Candidate shall automatically receive
a Thesis final grade of 5.00 (Failed). The Thesis Advisers grade is
disregarded.
Table 10.1 DETERMINATION OF THESIS FINAL GRADE

All Jurors
Passed
Two Jurors
Passed / One
Juror Failed
One Juror
Passed / Two
Jurors Failed
All Jurors
Failed
70%
3.0
(Passed)
5.0
(Failed)
5.0
(Failed)
30.0%
Juror 1 (Chair)
Juror 2
Juror 3
Adviser
11.0
D10 Final Grade. The Thesis Final Grade obtained by the Candidate during the
Thesis Deliberation is automatically equivalent to the grade the student will receive
for the Design 10 course. Thus, the Thesis Adviser shall not, in an circumstance,
change the grade of his/her Thesis Student whether the student successfully or
unsuccessfully defended his Thesis project.
A student who obtained a deliberation grade of 5.0 (Failed) shall receive an encoded
D10 grade of WP (Withdrawal with Permission) as reflected in the Form X.
The Thesis Council shall review and reserve the right to correct the grade given by
the Thesis Jury if there is a computation error or conversion discrepancy between the
Thesis Grade and the Equivalent Grade. This shall be relayed to the student through
his Adviser.
Students who unsuccessfully defended their Thesis projects are encouraged to keep
their copies of the Jury Final Grading Sheet. The comments on the grading sheet
are usually the basis for deliberation should the student re-enroll the AD10 course.
12.0
13.0
Page 89 of 145
Thesis Projects Subject to Revisions. A Candidate who is required to undertake

retouches/revisions as indicated in the Final Jury Grading Sheet, shall be guided by
the following:
12.1
The Thesis Jury Chair shall furnish the Candidate/Student with the duplicate/
carbon copy of the Final Jury Grading Sheet. The Jurys required revisions
and changes should be clearly indicated in this Grading Sheet.
12.2
The student should accomplish the required revisions and modifications

within three (3) school days from the deliberation date. It is the responsibility
of the student to look for and meet with the Jury Chair and at least one Jury
Member for proper checking and endorsement of the completed works.
Presentation and submission of revisions shall be conducted within the
confines of the College of Architecture of the University of Santo Tomas.
12.3
The Jury Chair and one Jury Member shall affix their respective signatures in
the designated box in the duplicate copy of the Final Jury Grading Sheet to
indicate approval and endorsement of the presented revisions.
12.4
The student then presents this duly signed Grading Sheet to the designated
Thesis Coordinator to officially record his/her Thesis Final Grade. The Thesis
Coordinator hands over to the student the original copy of the Final Jury
Grading Sheet.
12.5
The student shall automatically receive a grade of 5.00, converted to WP, if

he is unable to either present revisions within the required period or his
revisions were deemed below expectations.
Non-Appearance. In the event that the Candidate fails to appear on the scheduled
date or is more than 15 minutes late for his scheduled presentation, he shall have
forfeited his chance to defend his Thesis project. The Candidate shall automatically
receive a 5.0 (Fail) as final grade for AD10.
If the Candidate is suddenly indisposed or has a valid family emergency, and thus
cannot attend his scheduled Thesis Defense, he shall send, through a
representative, the (i) Thesis Book, (ii) Thesis Logbook, and (iii) all completed Thesis
Works as indicated in Section 2.0, to the assigned Thesis Day Chair on the day he is
originally scheduled for deliberation.
14.0
Appeals for Reconsideration and Requests for Re-deliberations. The

Candidate/Student may appeal to the Dean of the College of Architecture, in writing,
for a reconsideration of the Final Thesis Grade or may request for a re-deliberation if:
14.1
There is a valid medical reason or family/personal emergency for the

Candidate to miss his scheduled Thesis Defense. This must be supported by
a hospital or legal certification.
14.2
There is strong substantiated evidence of inappropriate behavior coming from

any member of the Thesis Jury based on the guidelines for Jury Members.
Page 90 of 145
15.0
Outstanding Theses and Thesis of the Year. Thesis students who obtain a Final
Thesis Grade of 1.0 (Excellent) shall receive Outstanding Thesis recognitions and
are eligible for the Thesis of the Year Award. Before the end of the second term of
each academic year, a week-long exhibit of all Outstanding Theses shall be held at
the UST College of Architecture.
Their thesis projects stand as evidence of the abilities and accomplishments of the
Colleges outstanding thesis candidates; it is a substantial rendition of their design
thinking and skills. The Outstanding Thesis Exhibit is the representation of these
talents to the architectural academic community. As such, the exhibit assumes a role
in forming the public understanding of what the UST College of Architecture is.
Outstanding Thesis Books are retained by the College for future reference. They are
grouped in one area for easy access, and advisers of future RMA, AD9, and AD10
classes are encouraged to refer to them as indicators of the level of quality for the
thesis program. It forms part of the cultural memory of the College.
During the Outstanding Theses Exhibit, students shall again present their projects in
front of a jury composed of UST College of Architecture Alumni. The Jury shall
grade them based on the same deliberations criteria presented on Table 9.1.
The student with the most successful thesis presentation of that years graduating
class shall receive the sole distinction of Thesis of the Year, awarded during the
Solemn Investitures.
16.0
D10 Re-enrollment. D10 students who were not endorsed or who received a WP or
5.0 are eligible to re-enroll depending on the following scenarios:
Table 16.1 D10 RE-ENROLLMENT
Scenario
Earliest D10 Re-enrollment Eligibility
Student was not endorsed by the Thesis

Adviser during the First Endorsement
May re-enroll D10 offered in the first term of

the succeeding academic year
Student was not endorsed by the Thesis

Council during the Final Endorsement

Student/Candidate was absent during his/

her scheduled Thesis Defense and with no
valid reason

Student/Candidate did not successfully

defend his/her Thesis Project
May re-enroll D10 offered in the immediate

special term
These conditions apply to AD10 students enrolled during the Second Term of an
Academic Year.
16.0
Questions and Inquiries. The Student is encouraged to consult with members of the
Thesis Council for any questions and inquiries regarding Design 9 &10. The Student
shall maintain constant coordination and regular consultation with his/her Thesis
Adviser.
Page 91 of 145
Recognition &
Acknowledgment of

I further acknowledge that I am now tasked to finalize my research work in accordance

with the existing guidelines and policies of the University of Santo Tomas College of
Architecture. I am likewise required to submit the said research work on the time and
date designated by the Thesis Adviser this Term.
Conforme:
Date:
_______________________________________
_____________________
Page 92 of 145
Cut here
Recognition &
Acknowledgment of

I further acknowledge that I am now tasked to finalize my research work in accordance

with the existing guidelines and policies of the University of Santo Tomas College of
Architecture. I am likewise required to submit the said research work on the time and
date designated by the Thesis Adviser this Term.
Conforme:
Date:
_______________________________________
_____________________
Note to the Student: Kindly detach this duplicate copy and submit to your Adviser on your first consultation meeting.
Note to the Adviser: Kindly collect and compile in a short brown envelope. Thank you.
Page 93 of 145
Week 1, 16-21 January 2017

Name
Section
Proposed Site
Page 94 of 145


Poor
Below
Expectation
Satisfactory
Above
Expectation
Excellent

Signed:
________________________________________________
Page 95 of 145
Cut here
Name
Date


Poor
Below
Expectation
Satisfactory
Above
Expectation
Excellent

Signed:
________________________________________________
Note to the Adviser: Kindly collect & compile in a short brown envelope to be used as future reference for the students AD10 final assessment.
Page 96 of 145

Name
Section
Proposed Site
Page 97 of 145


Poor
Below
Expectation
Satisfactory
Above
Expectation
Excellent

Signed:
________________________________________________
Page 98 of 145
Cut here
Name
Date


Poor
Below
Expectation
Satisfactory
Above
Expectation
Excellent

Signed:
________________________________________________
Page 99 of 145
Week 3, 30 January - 4 February 2017

Name
Section
Proposed Site
Page 100 of 145


Poor
Below
Expectation
Satisfactory
Above
Expectation
Excellent

Signed:
________________________________________________
Page 101 of 145
Cut here
Name
Date


Poor
Below
Expectation
Satisfactory
Above
Expectation
Excellent

Signed:
________________________________________________
Page 102 of 145
D10 PRELIMINARY
ENDORSEMENT MATRIX
To be reviewed and marked by the Thesis Adviser
Student must be able to present his/her output to the Thesis Adviser as described in any of the highlighted/italicized/shaded
box to merit a preliminary endorsement.
A
0 - 29%
(NO OUTPUT)
30% - 49%
(DEVELOPING
OUTPUT)
50% - 74%
(HALFWAY
COMPLETE)
75% - 89%
(SUBSTANTIALLY
COMPLETE)
90% - 100%
(COMPLETE)
Site
Development Plan
(should be at
least 50%)
Only the building

line, contour lines
and property line are
shown
Everything stated in
A
+
Access and
circulation (roadway,
sidewalk or
pathways)
B
+
Landscaping
(softscape and
hardscape on
planting strips,
medians, and open
spaces); parking
areas for public,
admin/staff, service,
and PWD; site
ingress and egress
C
+
Drawing label, North
orientation,
graphical or
numerical scale;
labels (buildings,
outdoor spaces, and
parking); labels for
site and building
ingress and egress
(public, admin, staff,
VIP, service)
D
+
Rendering of
building(s),
landscaping
(hardscape and
softscape), water
features, and open
spaces; buildings
cast shadows;
traffic/circulation
flow for people and
vehicles including
drop-off and pickup; vicinity map
highlighting the
project site with
appropriate
graphical scale and
labels
Floor Plans
(should be at
least 50%)
Less than half of all

floors of all buildings
are drawn
schematically
More than half of all

are drawn
schematically
All floors of all

buildings with wall
thickness; door and
window openings
are indicated; all
spaces are legibly
labelled
C
+
All doors and
windows are drawn;
furniture/fixture/
equipment (FFE)
are drawn on all
major spaces,
administrative
spaces, and toilets
'D'
+
FFE shown on the
rest of the spaces;
all floor plans are
labelled; numerical
or graphical scale
are shown; gridlines
and section lines
are drawn; drawings
are rendered
Elevations
(should be at
least 50%)

required elevations

required elevations
All required
elevations
'C'
+
Drawing labels,
gridlines, finish floor
lines
D'
+
Shade and
shadows; drawings
are rendered;
numerical or
graphical scale
Required
Output
Page 103 of 145
Cut here
Name
Date
D10 PRELIMINARY
ENDORSEMENT MATRIX
Thesis Adviser Copy
To be reviewed and marked by the Thesis Adviser
A
0 - 29%
(NO OUTPUT)
30% - 49%
(DEVELOPING
OUTPUT)
50% - 74%
(HALFWAY
COMPLETE)
75% - 89%
(SUBSTANTIALLY
COMPLETE)
90% - 100%
(COMPLETE)
Site
Development Plan
(should be at
least 50%)
Only the building

line, contour lines
shown
A
+
Access and
sidewalk or
pathways)
B
+
Landscaping
(softscape and
hardscape on
planting strips,
medians, and open
spaces); parking
areas for public,
and PWD; site
ingress and egress
C
+
orientation,
graphical or
numerical scale;
labels (buildings,
outdoor spaces, and
site and building
ingress and egress
VIP, service)
D
+
Rendering of
building(s),
landscaping
(hardscape and
softscape), water
features, and open
spaces; buildings
cast shadows;
traffic/circulation
flow for people and
vehicles including
highlighting the
project site with
appropriate
graphical scale and
labels
Floor Plans
(should be at
least 50%)

are drawn
schematically

are drawn
schematically
All floors of all

buildings with wall
thickness; door and
window openings
are indicated; all
spaces are legibly
labelled
C
+
All doors and
windows are drawn;
furniture/fixture/
equipment (FFE)
are drawn on all
major spaces,
administrative
spaces, and toilets
'D'
+
FFE shown on the
rest of the spaces;
all floor plans are
labelled; numerical
or graphical scale
and section lines
are drawn; drawings
are rendered
Elevations
(should be at
least 50%)

required elevations

required elevations
All required
elevations
'C'
+
Drawing labels,
lines
D'
+
Shade and
shadows; drawings
are rendered;
numerical or
graphical scale
Required
Output
Page 104 of 145
0 - 29%
(NO OUTPUT)
30% - 49%
(DEVELOPING
OUTPUT)
50% - 74%
(HALFWAY
COMPLETE)
75% - 89%
(SUBSTANTIALLY
COMPLETE)
90% - 100%
(COMPLETE)
Sections
(should be at
least 30%)

required sections

required sections
All required sections

are drawn
completely
'C'
+
Drawing labels,
gridlines, different
levels are shown; all
rooms are labelled
'D'
+
Furniture/fixture/
equipment, ceiling
are drawn; drawings
are rendered;
numerical or
graphical scale
Architectural Bay
Section
(ABS) and
Spot Details
(should be at
least 30%)

architectural details

All five architectural

details;
ABS showing the
lowest to the highest
architectural feature
'C'
+
Callouts,
dimensions, floor/
ceiling/apex line,
material specs,
furniture/fixture/
equipment,
gridlines, drawing
and room labels,
scale of the ABS
D
+
Five architectural
spot details with
dimensions,
specifications, scale
and drawing labels
Structural
Concept
and Details
(should be at
least 30%)

structural details

structural details
All five structural

details are drawn
with dimensions,
specifications,
scale, and drawing
labels
'C'
+
Structural Concept
(isometric) with
drawing label
D
+
Shade and shadows
and rendering for
the Struct. Concept
Architectur
al Details:
Utilities
(should be at
least 30%)
Less than complete

Reflected Ceiling
and Lighting Layout
Reflected Ceiling
and Lighting Layout
'B'
+
Power Layout
'C'
+
Fire Protection
Layout
'D'
+
Complete labels,
scale, legends, and
corresponding
perspective
Perspectives
(should be at
least 30%)
More than half of the

required exterior and
architectural interior
perspectives are
modeled
More than half of

the required exterior
and architectural
interior perspectives
are modeled with
components
More than half of

and architectural
are rendered with
materials
More than half of

and architectural
are rendered with
shadows and light
All required exterior

and architectural
are post processed
with entourage, and
background.
Concept
Board
(should be at
least 30%)
Project Title,
Project Background,
Project Goal and
Objectives
'A'
+
Design Objectives,
Design
Considerations,
Philosophy and
Concept
B'
+
Conceptual
Development, Form
or Shape Finding
C
+
Site Analysis
D'
+
All iconography,
images, illustrations
to support A, B,
C, and D;
Rendering
Thesis
Book
(should be at
least 75%)
Updated / corrected
less than 30% of the
book
Updated / corrected
book
Updated / corrected
more than 50% of
the book
Updated / corrected
more than 75% of
the book
Updated /
corrected /
completed all
requirements for the
Thesis Book
Required
Output
Page 105 of 145
Cut here
Name
Date
0 - 29%
(NO OUTPUT)
30% - 49%
(DEVELOPING
OUTPUT)
50% - 74%
(HALFWAY
COMPLETE)
75% - 89%
(SUBSTANTIALLY
COMPLETE)
90% - 100%
(COMPLETE)
Sections
(should be at
least 30%)

required sections

required sections

are drawn
completely
'C'
+
Drawing labels,
rooms are labelled
'D'
+
Furniture/fixture/
equipment, ceiling
are drawn; drawings
are rendered;
numerical or
graphical scale
Architectural Bay
Section
(ABS) and
Spot Details
(should be at
least 30%)



details;
ABS showing the
'C'
+
Callouts,
dimensions, floor/
ceiling/apex line,
material specs,
furniture/fixture/
equipment,
gridlines, drawing
and room labels,
scale of the ABS
D
+
Five architectural
spot details with
dimensions,
and drawing labels
Structural
Concept
and Details
(should be at
least 30%)

structural details

structural details
All five structural

details are drawn
with dimensions,
specifications,
scale, and drawing
labels
'C'
+
Structural Concept
(isometric) with
drawing label
D
+
Shade and shadows
and rendering for
the Struct. Concept
Architectur
al Details:
Utilities
(should be at
least 30%)
Less than complete

Reflected Ceiling
and Lighting Layout
Reflected Ceiling
and Lighting Layout
'B'
+
Power Layout
'C'
+
Fire Protection
Layout
'D'
+
Complete labels,
scale, legends, and
corresponding
perspective
Perspectives
(should be at
least 30%)

perspectives are
modeled
More than half of

and architectural
are modeled with
components
More than half of

and architectural
are rendered with
materials
More than half of

and architectural
are rendered with
shadows and light

and architectural
are post processed
with entourage, and
background.
Concept
Board
(should be at
least 30%)
Project Title,
Project Background,
Project Goal and
Objectives
'A'
+
Design Objectives,
Design
Considerations,
Philosophy and
Concept
B'
+
Conceptual
Development, Form
or Shape Finding
C
+
Site Analysis
D'
+
All iconography,
to support A, B,
C, and D;
Rendering
Thesis
Book
(should be at
least 75%)
Updated / corrected
book
Updated / corrected
book
Updated / corrected
more than 50% of
the book
Updated / corrected
more than 75% of
the book
Updated /
corrected /
completed all
requirements for the
Thesis Book
Required
Output
Page 106 of 145

Espana, Manila
THESIS PROGRAM
Certificate of Preliminary Endorsement


______________________________________________________________________
has been carefully evaluated and endorsed by the undersigned Thesis Adviser.
This further certifies that the student has successfully completed all the preliminary
requirements of the Architectural Design 10 course and is now eligible to proceed to final
phase of the Architectural Thesis Program.
This Certificate of Preliminary Endorsement is issued on ________________________.
_______________________________________
Thesis Adviser
Page 107 of 145
Cut here

Espana, Manila
THESIS PROGRAM
Certificate of Preliminary Endorsement


______________________________________________________________________
has been carefully evaluated and endorsed by the undersigned Thesis Adviser.
This further certifies that the student has successfully completed all the preliminary
requirements of the Architectural Design 10 course and is now eligible to proceed to final
phase of the Architectural Thesis Program.
This Certificate of Preliminary Endorsement is issued on ________________________.
_______________________________________
Thesis Adviser
Page 108 of 145
Week 4, 6-11 February 2017

Name
Section
Proposed Site
Page 109 of 145


Poor
Below
Expectation
Satisfactory
Above
Expectation
Excellent

Signed:
________________________________________________
Page 110 of 145
Cut here
Name
Date


Poor
Below
Expectation
Satisfactory
Above
Expectation
Excellent

Signed:
________________________________________________
Page 111 of 145

Name
Section
Proposed Site
Page 112 of 145


Poor
Below
Expectation
Satisfactory
Above
Expectation
Excellent

Signed:
________________________________________________
Page 113 of 145
Cut here
Name
Date


Poor
Below
Expectation
Satisfactory
Above
Expectation
Excellent

Signed:
________________________________________________
Page 114 of 145

Name
Section
Proposed Site
Page 115 of 145


Poor
Below
Expectation
Satisfactory
Above
Expectation
Excellent

Signed:
________________________________________________
Page 116 of 145
Cut here
Name
Date


Poor
Below
Expectation
Satisfactory
Above
Expectation
Excellent

Signed:
________________________________________________
Page 117 of 145
Week 7, 27 February - 4 March 2017

Name
Section
Proposed Site
Page 118 of 145


Poor
Below
Expectation
Satisfactory
Above
Expectation
Excellent

Signed:
________________________________________________
Page 119 of 145
Cut here
Name
Date


Poor
Below
Expectation
Satisfactory
Above
Expectation
Excellent

Signed:
________________________________________________
Page 120 of 145
Week 8, 6-11March 2017

Name
Section
Proposed Site
Page 121 of 145


Poor
Below
Expectation
Satisfactory
Above
Expectation
Excellent

Signed:
________________________________________________
Page 122 of 145
Cut here
Name
Date


Poor
Below
Expectation
Satisfactory
Above
Expectation
Excellent

Signed:
________________________________________________
Page 123 of 145
Week 9, 13-18 March 2017

Name
Section
Proposed Site
Page 124 of 145
Week 9, 13-18 March 2017


Poor
Below
Expectation
Satisfactory
Above
Expectation
Excellent

Signed:
________________________________________________
Page 125 of 145
Cut here
Name
Date
Week 9, 13-18 March 2017


Poor
Below
Expectation
Satisfactory
Above
Expectation
Excellent

Signed:
________________________________________________
Note to the Adviser: Kindly collect & compile in a short brown envelope to be used as future reference for the students AD10 final assessment
Page 126 of 145
Week 10, 20-25 March 2017

Name
Section
Proposed Site
Page 127 of 145
Week 10, 20-25 March 2017


Poor
Below
Expectation
Satisfactory
Above
Expectation
Excellent

Signed:
________________________________________________
Page 128 of 145
Cut here
Name
Date
Week 10, 20-25 March 2017


Poor
Below
Expectation
Satisfactory
Above
Expectation
Excellent

Signed:
________________________________________________
Page 129 of 145
Week 11, 27 March - 1 April 2017

Name
Section
Proposed Site
Page 130 of 145


Poor
Below
Expectation
Satisfactory
Above
Expectation
Excellent

Signed:
________________________________________________
Page 131 of 145
Cut here
Name
Date


Poor
Below
Expectation
Satisfactory
Above
Expectation
Excellent

Signed:
________________________________________________
Page 132 of 145
Cut here
Name
Section
Title
D10 FINAL ENDORSEMENT MATRIX

To be reviewed and marked by the Thesis Council Representative
A
0 - 29%
(NO OUTPUT)
30% - 49%
(DEVELOPING
OUTPUT)
50% - 74%
(HALFWAY
COMPLETE)
75% - 89%
(SUBSTANTIALLY
COMPLETE)
90% - 100%
(COMPLETE)
Site
Development Plan
(should be at
least 90%)
Only the building

line, contour lines
shown
A
+
Access and
sidewalk or
pathways)
B
+
Landscaping
(softscape and
hardscape on
planting strips,
medians, and open
spaces); parking
areas for public,
and PWD; site
ingress and egress
C
+
orientation, graphical
or numerical scale;
labels (buildings,
outdoor spaces, and
site and building
ingress and egress
VIP, service)
D
+
Rendering of
building(s),
landscaping
(hardscape and
softscape), water
features, and open
spaces; buildings
cast shadows;
traffic/circulation
flow for people and
vehicles including
highlighting the
project site with
appropriate
graphical scale and
labels
Floor Plans
(should be at
least 90%)

are drawn
schematically

are drawn
schematically
All floors of all

buildings with wall
thickness; door and
window openings are
indicated; all spaces
are legibly labelled
C
+
All doors and
windows are drawn;
furniture/fixture/
equipment (FFE) are
drawn on all major
spaces,
administrative
spaces, and toilets
'D'
+
FFE shown on the
rest of the spaces;
all floor plans are
labelled; numerical
or graphical scale
and section lines
are drawn; drawings
are rendered
Elevations
(should be at
least 90%)

required elevations

required elevations
All required
elevations
'C'
+
Drawing labels,
lines
D'
+
Shade and
shadows; drawings
are rendered;
numerical or
graphical scale
Required
Output
Page 133 of 145
Cut here
Name
Section
Title
D10 FINAL ENDORSEMENT MATRIX

To be reviewed and marked by the Thesis Council Representative
A
0 - 29%
(NO OUTPUT)
30% - 49%
(DEVELOPING
OUTPUT)
50% - 74%
(HALFWAY
COMPLETE)
75% - 89%
(SUBSTANTIALLY
COMPLETE)
90% - 100%
(COMPLETE)
Site
Development Plan
(should be at
least 90%)
Only the building

line, contour lines
shown
A
+
Access and
sidewalk or
pathways)
B
+
Landscaping
(softscape and
hardscape on
planting strips,
medians, and open
spaces); parking
areas for public,
and PWD; site
ingress and egress
C
+
orientation, graphical
or numerical scale;
labels (buildings,
outdoor spaces, and
site and building
ingress and egress
VIP, service)
D
+
Rendering of
building(s),
landscaping
(hardscape and
softscape), water
features, and open
spaces; buildings
cast shadows;
traffic/circulation
flow for people and
vehicles including
highlighting the
project site with
appropriate
graphical scale and
labels
Floor Plans
(should be at
least 90%)

are drawn
schematically

are drawn
schematically
All floors of all

buildings with wall
thickness; door and
window openings are
indicated; all spaces
are legibly labelled
C
+
All doors and
windows are drawn;
furniture/fixture/
equipment (FFE) are
drawn on all major
spaces,
administrative
spaces, and toilets
'D'
+
FFE shown on the
rest of the spaces;
all floor plans are
labelled; numerical
or graphical scale
and section lines
are drawn; drawings
are rendered
Elevations
(should be at
least 90%)

required elevations

required elevations
All required
elevations
'C'
+
Drawing labels,
lines
D'
+
Shade and
shadows; drawings
are rendered;
numerical or
graphical scale
Required
Output
Page 134 of 145
Cut here
Name
Section
0 - 29%
(NO OUTPUT)
30% - 49%
(DEVELOPING
OUTPUT)
50% - 74%
(HALFWAY
COMPLETE)
75% - 89%
(SUBSTANTIALLY
COMPLETE)
90% - 100%
(COMPLETE)
Sections
(should be at
least 75%)

required sections

required sections

are drawn
completely
'C'
+
Drawing labels,
rooms are labelled
'D'
+
Furniture/fixture/
equipment, ceiling
are drawn; drawings
are rendered;
numerical or
graphical scale
Architectural Bay
Section
(ABS) and
Spot Details
(should be at
least 75%)



details;
ABS showing the
'C'
+
Callouts,
dimensions, floor/
ceiling/apex line,
material specs,
furniture/fixture/
equipment,
gridlines, drawing
and room labels,
scale of the ABS
D
+
Five architectural
spot details with
dimensions,
and drawing labels
Structural
Concept
and Details
(should be at
least 75%)

structural details

structural details
All five structural

details are drawn
with dimensions,
specifications, scale,
and drawing labels
'C'
+
Structural Concept
(isometric) with
drawing label
D
+
Shade and shadows
and rendering for
the Struct. Concept
Architectur
al Details:
Utilities
(should be at
least 75%)
Less than complete

Reflected Ceiling
and Lighting Layout
Reflected Ceiling
and Lighting Layout
'B'
+
Power Layout
'C'
+
Fire Protection
Layout
'D'
+
Complete labels,
scale, legends, and
corresponding
perspective
Perspectives
(should be at
least 75%)

perspectives are
modeled

perspectives are
modeled with
components

perspectives are
rendered with
materials
More than half of

and architectural
are rendered with
shadows and light

and architectural
are post processed
with entourage, and
background.
Concept
Board
(should be at
least 75%)
Project Title,
Project Background,
Project Goal and
Objectives
'A'
+
Design Objectives,
Design
Considerations,
Philosophy and
Concept
B'
+
Conceptual
Development, Form
or Shape Finding
C
+
Site Analysis
D'
+
All iconography,
to support A, B,
C, and D;
Rendering
Required
Output
FINAL EVALUATION
DID NOT MEET ENDORSEMENT

CRITERIA
SATISFACTORILY MET
ENDORSEMENT CRITERIA
Evaluated by / Date
Page 135 of 145
Cut here
Name
Section
0 - 29%
(NO OUTPUT)
30% - 49%
(DEVELOPING
OUTPUT)
50% - 74%
(HALFWAY
COMPLETE)
75% - 89%
(SUBSTANTIALLY
COMPLETE)
90% - 100%
(COMPLETE)
Sections
(should be at
least 75%)

required sections

required sections

are drawn
completely
'C'
+
Drawing labels,
rooms are labelled
'D'
+
Furniture/fixture/
equipment, ceiling
are drawn; drawings
are rendered;
numerical or
graphical scale
Architectural Bay
Section
(ABS) and
Spot Details
(should be at
least 75%)



details;
ABS showing the
'C'
+
Callouts,
dimensions, floor/
ceiling/apex line,
material specs,
furniture/fixture/
equipment,
gridlines, drawing
and room labels,
scale of the ABS
D
+
Five architectural
spot details with
dimensions,
and drawing labels
Structural
Concept
and Details
(should be at
least 75%)

structural details

structural details
All five structural

details are drawn
with dimensions,
specifications, scale,
and drawing labels
'C'
+
Structural Concept
(isometric) with
drawing label
D
+
Shade and shadows
and rendering for
the Struct. Concept
Architectur
al Details:
Utilities
(should be at
least 75%)
Less than complete

Reflected Ceiling
and Lighting Layout
Reflected Ceiling
and Lighting Layout
'B'
+
Power Layout
'C'
+
Fire Protection
Layout
'D'
+
Complete labels,
scale, legends, and
corresponding
perspective
Perspectives
(should be at
least 75%)

perspectives are
modeled

perspectives are
modeled with
components

perspectives are
rendered with
materials
More than half of

and architectural
are rendered with
shadows and light

and architectural
are post processed
with entourage, and
background.
Concept
Board
(should be at
least 75%)
Project Title,
Project Background,
Project Goal and
Objectives
'A'
+
Design Objectives,
Design
Considerations,
Philosophy and
Concept
B'
+
Conceptual
Development, Form
or Shape Finding
C
+
Site Analysis
D'
+
All iconography,
to support A, B,
C, and D;
Rendering
Required
Output
FINAL EVALUATION
DID NOT MEET ENDORSEMENT

CRITERIA
SATISFACTORILY MET
ENDORSEMENT CRITERIA
Evaluated by / Date
Page 136 of 145
Cut here

Espana, Manila
THESIS PROGRAM
Certificate of Final Endorsement

This Certificate is hereby given to ___________________________________________ whose

thesis entitled ________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________ has been
carefully evaluated and endorsed by the undersigned Thesis Council representative.
This further certifies that the student has successfully completed production of at least ninety
percent (90%) of the Architectural Design 10 course requirements and is now eligible to defend
his/her thesis project on the designated date and session to be determined during the drawing of
lots for all candidates that merited this Final Endorsement.
In the meantime, student is advised to discuss with his/her Adviser the best presentation option
for the thesis project.
This Certificate of Final Endorsement is issued on ________________________.
________________________________________________
Thesis Council representative signature over printed name
Page 137 of 145
Cut here

Espana, Manila
THESIS PROGRAM
Certificate of Final Endorsement

This Certificate is hereby given to ___________________________________________ whose

thesis entitled ________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________ has been
carefully evaluated and endorsed by the undersigned Thesis Council representative.
This further certifies that the student has successfully completed production of at least ninety
percent (90%) of the Architectural Design 10 course requirements and is now eligible to defend
his/her thesis project on the designated date and session to be determined during the drawing of
lots for all candidates that merited this Final Endorsement.
In the meantime, student is advised to discuss with his/her Adviser the best presentation option
for the thesis project.
This Certificate of Final Endorsement is issued on ________________________.
________________________________________________
Thesis Council representative signature over printed name
Page 138 of 145
Cut here
Thesis Grading Sheet: Adviser

(Page 1 of 2)
Name
Section
Title
Project Site
Adviser
To the Thesis Adviser: Kindly fill up the necessary information below to serve as a thorough assessment of the
A.
Please check the box if the student has the following in his/her final output. This will constitute 35% of the
students grade.
Content
Maximum %
Concept Board
3.50
Site Development Plan
3.50
All Floor Plans
3.50
All Elevations
3.50
All Sections
3.50
Architectural Bay Section, Design Focus Detail & Other Architectural Details
3.50
Structural Concept & Structural Details
3.50
Architectural (Utilities) Detail
3.50
Interior Architecture Perspective(s)
3.50
Exterior Perspective(s)
3.50
Grade
B. Is the work of good quality? Please evaluate the overall output of the student using the following evaluation
matrix. This will constitute 35% of the students grade.
Fail
Pass
Fair
Good
Very
Good
Excellent
14.7
16.1
17.0
18.4
19.5
21.0
Presentation of new ideas (design innovation) (20%)
4.9
5.4
5.7
6.2
6.5
7.0
Accuracy and legibility of drawings (20%)
4.9
5.4
5.7
6.2
6.5
7.0
Grading Criteria
Contribution to solving the Thesis Goal and Objectives
(60%)
Page 139 of 145
Cut here
Thesis Grading Sheet: Adviser (Page 2/2)

Grading Criteria
Fail
Pass
Fair
Good
Very Good
Excellent
8.8
9.6
10.1
10.9
11.6
12.5

5.2
5.7
6.1
6.6
7.0
7.5

punctually (20%)
3.5
3.8
4.0
4.4
4.6
5.0
D. Does the student display maturity and the right deportment during this term? Please evaluate the overall
Grading Criteria
Fail
Pass
Fair
Good
Very Good
Excellent
3.5
3.8
4.0
4.4
4.6
5.0
Further comments:
SUMMARY
Criteria
Output Grade
35%
Quality of Work
35%
Consultation Duties
25%
5%
EQUIVALENT 30% APPORTIONMENT OF THE FINAL THESIS GRADE
Graded by:
Date:
_______________________________________
_____________________
Page 140 of 145
Cut here
Do not write on these boxes

Day
Name
Section
Title
Adviser
Project Site
Date
Thesis Grade Computation
Session
Room
Seq
Point to Grade Conversion / Equivalent
A. Juror 1 Chair Grade
Final Grade
Remarks
Equivalent
B. Juror 2 Grade
Non Appearance
WP
WP
C. Juror 3 Grade
50.00 - 74.99
Fail
5.00
D. Average Jury Grade (A+B+C) / 3
75.00 - 78.99
Pass
3.00
79.00 - 81.99
Fair
2.75
82.00 - 83.99
Fair
2.50
84.00 - 86.99
Good
2.25
F. 70% Jury Grade (D X .70)
87.00 - 88.99
Good
2.00
G. 30% Adviser Grade (E X .30)
89.00 - 91.99
Good
1.75
H. Thesis Final Grade (F + G)
92.00 - 93.99
Very Good
1.50
I. EQUIVALENT TO:
Note: H is not to be rounded off
94.00 - 95.99
Very Good
1.25
96.00 - 100.00
Excellent
1.00
E. Adviser Grade
Summary: (Kindly use back page for additional comments)
Candidates Signature
Thesis Jury
Jury 1 Chair
Jury 2
Jury 3
Revision Due Date:
Assessment (Please encircle)

Satisfactory
Original Grading Sheet Released By:
Unsatisfactory
Date:
Page 141 of 145
Cut here
Do not write on these boxes

Duplicate / Office File Copy
Day
Name
Section
Title
Adviser
Project Site
Date
Thesis Grade Computation
Session
Room
Seq
Point to Grade Conversion / Equivalent
A. Juror 1 Chair Grade
Final Grade
Remarks
Equivalent
B. Juror 2 Grade
Non Appearance
WP
WP
C. Juror 3 Grade
50.00 - 74.99
Fail
5.00
D. Average Jury Grade (A+B+C) / 3
75.00 - 78.99
Pass
3.00
79.00 - 81.99
Fair
2.75
82.00 - 83.99
Fair
2.50
84.00 - 86.99
Good
2.25
F. 70% Jury Grade (D X .70)
87.00 - 88.99
Good
2.00
G. 30% Adviser Grade (E X .30)
89.00 - 91.99
Good
1.75
H. Thesis Final Grade (F + G)
92.00 - 93.99
Very Good
1.50
I. EQUIVALENT TO:
Note: H is not to be rounded off
94.00 - 95.99
Very Good
1.25
96.00 - 100.00
Excellent
1.00
E. Adviser Grade
Summary: (Kindly use back page for additional comments)
Candidates Signature
Thesis Jury
Jury 1 Chair
Jury 2
Revision Due Date:
Jury 3
Assessment (Please encircle)
Satisfactory
Checked by / Date:
Checked by / Date:
Unsatisfactory
To the Student: Kindly submit this form to the Thesis

Council Coordinator afterwards.
Page 142 of 145
Cut here
Grading Sheet: Thesis Juror 1 (Chair)

Name
Section
Title
Presentation Option (Encircle)
Project Site
A
Grading Criteria
FAIL
50 - 74
PASS
75 - 78
FAIR
79 - 83
GOOD
84 - 91
Comment Box
VG
92 - 95
EXC
96 - 100
Given
Grade
Successful evolution of the design concept and its substantial integration to

the design solution (10.0%)
5.0 - 7.4
7.5 - 7.8
7.9 - 8.3
8.4 - 9.1
9.2 - 9.5
9.6 - 10
site and its environs (7.5%)
3.8 - 5.5
5.6 - 5.8
5.9 - 6.2
6.3 - 6.8
6.9 - 7.1
7.2 - 7.5

objectives (30.0%)
15.0 - 22.2
22.5 - 23.4
23.7 - 24.9
25.2 - 27.3
27.6 - 28.5
28.8 - 30.0
Innovative building elevations resulting in building character that relates to

the design concept (10.0%)
5.0 - 7.4
7.5 - 7.8
7.9 - 8.3
8.4 - 9.1
9.2 - 9.5
9.6 - 10

section; critical selection & competent translation of spot details (7.5%)
3.8 - 5.5
5.6 - 5.8
5.9 - 6.2
6.3 - 6.8
6.9 - 7.1
7.2 - 7.5
Creative choice of design focus leading to its successful & substantial

integration to project (5.0%)
2.5 - 3.7
3.8 - 3.9
4.0 - 4.1
4.2 - 4.5
4.6 - 4.7
4.8 - 5.0
Appropriate choice of structural framework and critical selection and

competent translation of structural details (5.0%)
2.5 - 3.7
3.8 - 3.9
4.0 - 4.1
4.2 - 4.5
4.6 - 4.7
4.8 - 5.0
Accurate representation of architecture (utilities) details (7.5%)

3.8 - 5.5
5.6 - 5.8
5.9 - 6.2
6.3 - 6.8
6.9 - 7.1
7.2 - 7.5
Competent translation of exterior & interior perspectives (7.5%)

3.8 - 5.5
5.6 - 5.8
5.9 - 6.2
6.3 - 6.8
6.9 - 7.1
7.2 - 7.5
Overall creativity of visual presentation and legibility of drawings (10.0%)

5.0 - 7.4
7.5 - 7.8
7.9 - 8.3
8.4 - 9.1
Jury 1 Chair Signature Over Printed Name
9.2 - 9.5
9.6 - 10
Grade
Thesis Deliberation Result
Passed
Failed
Page 143 of 145
Cut here

Name
Section
Title
Project Site
A
Grading Criteria
FAIL
50 - 74
PASS
75 - 78
FAIR
79 - 83
GOOD
84 - 91
Comment Box
VG
92 - 95
EXC
96 - 100
Given
Grade

5.0 - 7.4
7.5 - 7.8
7.9 - 8.3
8.4 - 9.1
9.2 - 9.5
9.6 - 10
3.8 - 5.5
5.6 - 5.8
5.9 - 6.2
6.3 - 6.8
6.9 - 7.1
7.2 - 7.5

objectives (30.0%)
15.0 - 22.2
22.5 - 23.4
23.7 - 24.9
25.2 - 27.3
27.6 - 28.5
28.8 - 30.0

5.0 - 7.4
7.5 - 7.8
7.9 - 8.3
8.4 - 9.1
9.2 - 9.5
9.6 - 10

3.8 - 5.5
5.6 - 5.8
5.9 - 6.2
6.3 - 6.8
6.9 - 7.1
7.2 - 7.5

2.5 - 3.7
3.8 - 3.9
4.0 - 4.1
4.2 - 4.5
4.6 - 4.7
4.8 - 5.0

2.5 - 3.7
3.8 - 3.9
4.0 - 4.1
4.2 - 4.5
4.6 - 4.7
4.8 - 5.0

3.8 - 5.5
5.6 - 5.8
5.9 - 6.2
6.3 - 6.8
6.9 - 7.1
7.2 - 7.5

3.8 - 5.5
5.6 - 5.8
5.9 - 6.2
6.3 - 6.8
6.9 - 7.1
7.2 - 7.5

5.0 - 7.4
7.5 - 7.8
7.9 - 8.3
Juror 2 Signature Over Printed Name
8.4 - 9.1
9.2 - 9.5
9.6 - 10
Grade
Passed
Failed
Page 144 of 145
Cut here

Name
Section
Title
Project Site
A
Grading Criteria
FAIL
50 - 74
PASS
75 - 78
FAIR
79 - 83
GOOD
84 - 91
Comment Box
VG
92 - 95
EXC
96 - 100
Given
Grade

5.0 - 7.4
7.5 - 7.8
7.9 - 8.3
8.4 - 9.1
9.2 - 9.5
9.6 - 10
3.8 - 5.5
5.6 - 5.8
5.9 - 6.2
6.3 - 6.8
6.9 - 7.1
7.2 - 7.5

objectives (30.0%)
15.0 - 22.2
22.5 - 23.4
23.7 - 24.9
25.2 - 27.3
27.6 - 28.5
28.8 - 30.0

5.0 - 7.4
7.5 - 7.8
7.9 - 8.3
8.4 - 9.1
9.2 - 9.5
9.6 - 10

3.8 - 5.5
5.6 - 5.8
5.9 - 6.2
6.3 - 6.8
6.9 - 7.1
7.2 - 7.5

2.5 - 3.7
3.8 - 3.9
4.0 - 4.1
4.2 - 4.5
4.6 - 4.7
4.8 - 5.0

2.5 - 3.7
3.8 - 3.9
4.0 - 4.1
4.2 - 4.5
4.6 - 4.7
4.8 - 5.0

3.8 - 5.5
5.6 - 5.8
5.9 - 6.2
6.3 - 6.8
6.9 - 7.1
7.2 - 7.5

3.8 - 5.5
5.6 - 5.8
5.9 - 6.2
6.3 - 6.8
6.9 - 7.1
7.2 - 7.5

5.0 - 7.4
7.5 - 7.8
7.9 - 8.3
Juror 3 Signature Over Printed Name
8.4 - 9.1
9.2 - 9.5
9.6 - 10
Grade
Passed
Failed
Page 145 of 145
Congratulations!
You have hurdled the last part of the
Architectural Thesis Program.
You made it! Time to have your well
deserved rest.
See you in your Graduation!
HAS THIS LOGBOOK BEEN

HELPFUL TO YOU?
We would like to hear from you.
Please email your feedback at
arch.manalad@gmail.com.
Thank you for your cooperation.

UST College of Architecture Logbook

Uploaded by

Document Information

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

UST College of Architecture Logbook

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Kindly print this in A4 size paper and

ring bind with clear acetate front cover.

ARCHITECTURE THESIS LOGBOOK

The Pontifical and Royal

ARCHITECTURAL THESIS LOGBOOK

The 2016 Edition

UST College of Architecture Thesis Program AY 2016-2017

ARCHITECTURE THESIS LOGBOOK

UST College of Architecture Thesis Program AY 2016-2017

ARCHITECTURE THESIS LOGBOOK

Thesis Logbook Owner Information:

If found, kindly return to:

UST College of Architecture Thesis Program AY 2016-2017

ARCHITECTURE THESIS LOGBOOK

UST College of Architecture Thesis Program AY 2016-2017

ARCHITECTURE THESIS LOGBOOK

UST College of Architecture Thesis Program AY 2016-2017

ARCHITECTURE THESIS LOGBOOK

University of Santo Tomas

Like us on Facebook: @ArkiThesisCouncil and

UST College of Architecture Thesis Program AY 2016-2017

ARCHITECTURE THESIS LOGBOOK

Advisers for the

Ar. Froilan Fontecha

Ar. Rino Domingo Fernandez

Ar. Clarissa Avendano

Ar. Tobias Bonaobra

Ar. John Joseph Fernandez

Ar. Manuel Maximo Noche

Ar. Willa Solomon

Ar. Leah Dela Rosa

Ar. Jonathan Manalad

Ar. Marlon Carino

Ar. Enrique Sta. Maria

Ar. Sylvia Clemente

Ar. Juanito Malaga

Ar. Demetrio Alcaraz

Ar. Ma. Vicenta Sanchez

UST College of Architecture Thesis Program AY 2016-2017

ARCHITECTURE THESIS LOGBOOK

Thesis Adviser Information

UST College of Architecture Thesis Program AY 2016-2017

ARCHITECTURE THESIS LOGBOOK

Architectural Design 9 Calendar

Opening of School Year 2016-2017

Individual Consultation: CHAPTERS I, II, and III (Introduction, Review of

Individual Consultation: CHAPTER IV (Site Profile & Analysis)

SUBMISSION OF THESIS PROPOSALS

Individual Consultation: CHAPTER VI (Technical Data Presentation)

Individual Consultation: CHAPTER VII (Design Focus)

Individual Consultation: CHAPTER VIII (Space Programming and Analysis)

Individual Consultation: CHAPTER IX (Conceptual Development)

Preliminary Examination Week

ADVISERS REVIEW OF THESIS BOOK: PRELIMINARY DRAFT

Individual Consultation: FLOOR PLANS

Individual Consultation: ELEVATIONS & SECTIONS

Refinement of Thesis Book

Individual Consultation: ARCHITECTURAL BAY SECTION, DETAILS, and

Individual Consultation: STRUCTURAL CONCEPT AND DETAILS

Individual Consultation: ARCHITECTURAL DETAILS: UTILITIES

Individual Consultation: EXTERIOR AND INTERIOR ARCHITECTURE

ADVISERS COURSE ASSESSMENT: THESIS BOOK PREFINAL DRAFT

Final Examination Week

UST College of Architecture Thesis Program AY 2016-2017