Professional Documents
Culture Documents
through Aging
Jorge L. Ali, MD, PhD,1,2 Patricia Schimchak, MD,1 Herminio P. Negri, MD,1
Robert Monts-Mic, OD, MPhil1
Purpose: To evaluate the optical and densitometric changes that take place in the crystalline lens with aging.
Design: Cross-sectional study.
Participants: Seventy-two eyes of 72 patients of different ages (8 80 years) with a clear lens, a visual acuity
of 20/25 or better, and no ocular disease.
Methods: In each case, the lens thickness, optical density, modulation transfer function (MTF), and intraocular aberrations were measured.
Main Outcome Measures: Embryonic and fetal nucleus density, lens thickness, intraocular high-order
aberration (HOA), and 0.1 MTF.
Results: Embryonic, anterior, and posterior fetal nucleus densities show a positive correlation with age
(P0.0001, P0.0001, and P0.0001, respectively). Lens thickness also shows a positive correlation with age
(P0.0001). Total ocular and corneal HOAs for a 6-mm pupil show a positive correlation with age (P 0.036 and
P0.0001, respectively). Ocular and corneal Zernike polynomials Z4iZ6i and intraocular spherical aberration
(Z40) also show a positive correlation with age (P 0.001, P 0.039, and P 0.001, respectively). Intraocular
coma aberration (Z31) shows a negative linear correlation with age (P0.0001). In addition, 0.1 MTF decreased
with age from 18.557 to 10.100 cycles per degree.
Conclusion: There is a degradation of the optical quality of the crystalline lens with aging that is associated with
morphological changes (thickness and density). These results are important for the consideration of lens replacement
in the absence of evident cataract. Ophthalmology 2005;112:20222029 2005 by the American Academy of
Ophthalmology.
Visual function is affected by environmental light conditions, the optical quality of the eye, and neural processing of
visual information. The quality of the image on the retina is
degraded because of scattering, diffraction at the pupil,
defocus due to accommodation or ametropia, and aberrations of the eye.15 Scattering is not as important in young
subjects as it is in older subjects. As a person ages, scattering becomes an important contributor of image degradation.3 6 The aforementioned changes result in a degradation
of the optical performance of the human eye.
The crystalline lens undergoes changes with age. The lens
grows in size and weight throughout life.7 It has been estimated
that the thickness of a human lens increases about 0.02 mm per
Originally received: October 19, 2004.
Accepted: April 20, 2005.
Manuscript no. 2004-201.
1
Research, Development, and Innovation Department, VISSUM, Instituto
Oftalmolgico de Alicante, Alicante, Spain.
2
School of Medicine, Miguel Hernndez University, Alicante, Spain.
This study has been supported in part by a grant of the Spanish Ministry of
Health, Instituto Carlos III, Red Temtica de Investigacin en Oftalmologa,
Subproyecto de Ciruga Refractiva y Calidad Visual, Madrid, Spain (grant no.:
C03/13).
The authors have no proprietary interest in any of the materials or methods
described herein.
Correspondence to Prof Jorge L. Ali, MD, PhD, VISSUM, Instituto Oftalmolgico de Alicante, Universidad Miguel Hernndez, Avda. Denia s/n,
Edificio VISSUM, 03016, Alicante, Spain. E-mail: jlalio@vissum.com.
2022
year.8,9 As new fiber cells are formed, older cells are displaced
towards the center of the lens, or lens nucleus, which becomes
denser. The most superficial area of the lens, formed by
younger fiber cells, is called the lens cortex. With aging, the
molecular changes that take place in the crystalline lens should
contribute to a gradual reduction in transparency. In many
cases, the aging process of the crystalline lens reaches a point
where vision is impaired. The clinical condition of cataract is
defined at that point. The molecular changes that increase the
density of the lens result in an increase in the scattering and
aberration of light waves and a degradation of the optical
quality of the eye. Until now, the correlation between optical
(high-order aberrations [HOAs] and modulation transfer function [MTF]) and densitometric changes of the crystalline lens
that take place during the aging process has not been studied.
We present here a comprehensive study in which these
optical and densitometric changes have been measured in
different age groups of patients without cataract, to evaluate
ways in which morphology and optical performance of the
human crystalline lens degrade with aging.
Figure 1. Photographs using a flash intensity of 200 Wseconds in a Scheimpflug slit lamp. a, Eight-year-old subject. b, Eighty-year-old subject. Linear
densitometric analysis to quantify nuclear density. 1, 2, 3 densities at the embryonic nucleus, anterior fetal nucleus, and posterior fetal nucleus,
respectively.
Figure 2. Photographs using a flash intensity of 200 Wseconds in a Scheimpflug slit lamp. a, Eight-year-old subject. A. anterior; R radius. b,
Eighty-year-old subject. Axial biometric analysis to quantify lens thickness. 1, 2, 3 densities at the embryonic nucleus, anterior fetal nucleus, and
posterior fetal nucleus, respectively.
2023
Figure 3. Curves of spatial frequency and modulation transfer function (MTF) obtained using the Optical Quality Analysis System in (a) an 8-year-old
subject, (b) a 30-year-old subject, and (c) an 80-year-old subject. c/d cycles per degree.
Scheimpflug Photography
To evaluate lens morphology and densitometric data more objectively, a Scheimpflug slit lamp (EAS 1000, Nidek, Japan) was
used.12 In this technique, slit-lamp photography measures light
that is reflected anteriorly from the lens to the camera. To record
a slit image, an alignment system is coupled to a television monitor
and a fixation light is placed to lie along the optical axis of the slit
projection lens. A photograph is taken using a flash intensity of
200 Wseconds. Density is measured by optical density units that
are EAS 1000 specific. The resulting cross-sectional image of the
anterior chamber and lens is displayed on a monitor for evaluation
by the operator. If satisfactory, the image can be transferred to the
computer for analysis. To quantify nuclear lens density, linear
densitometric analysis of the image was performed. Density was
measured at the embryonic, anterior, and posterior fetal nuclei (Fig
1). The embryonic nucleus is composed solely of primary fiber
cells. The fetal nucleus consists of the embryonic nucleus and all
the secondary fiber cells added onto it until birth. To quantify lens
thickness, an axial biometric analysis of the image was performed
(Fig 2). This analysis was performed in a masked fashion by one
of the observers (PS).
2024
Wavefront Analyzer
Ocular and corneal wavefront errors were measured with a HartmannShack aberrometer (Wavefront Analyzer, Topcon, Tokyo,
Japan). For each eye, measurements were repeated at least 3 times
to obtain a well-focused properly aligned image of the eye. Measurements were taken for 4- and 6-mm pupils. The Wavefront
Analyzer gives us the total ocular and corneal aberrations for 4and 6-mm pupils, comalike Zernike polynomials (Z3iZ5i) and
Z4iZ6i for a 6-mm pupil, and ocular and corneal Zs for 4- and
6-mm pupils. Zernike mode Z33 through Z33 plus a fifth-order Z
(Z55 through Z55) corresponds to comalike aberrations. From
ocular and corneal aberrations, intraocular aberrations can be obtained. Intraocular aberration is the difference between ocular and
corneal aberrations. Intraocular aberrations are due more to the
crystalline lens and less to the posterior corneal surface.
Total ocular and corneal HOAs for a 6-mm pupil and ocular
and corneal comalike, ocular and corneal Z4iZ6i, and intraocular
spherical (Z40) and coma (Z31) aberrations were studied.
Data Analysis
Analyses were performed using SPSS 11.0 for Windows software
(SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL). Values are presented as means SDs.
The relationship between all variables and age was modeled using
the bivariate correlation model and Pearson correlation (r).
Figure 4. a, Embryonic nucleus (flash intensity, 200 Wseconds) as a function of age. A positive correlation was found after the age of 40 years (r 0.762,
P0.0001). b, Embryonic nucleus (flash intensity, 200 Wseconds) in 4 age groups. The mean difference using Bonferroni multiple comparison is
statistically significant for groups 2 and 3 (P 0.002) and for groups 3 and 4 (P0.0001). Error bars, minimum and maximum of the 95% confidence
interval.
Results
Results were first analyzed for the entire population, then subjects
were arbitrarily divided into 4 age groups: group 1 included
subjects from 8 to 20 years old (n 15); group 2, subjects from
21 to 40 (n 20); group 3, subjects from 41 to 60 (n 21); and
group 4, subjects from 61 to 80 (n 16).
Figure 5. a, Anterior fetal nucleus (flash intensity, 200 Wseconds) as a function of age. A positive correlation was found after the age of 40 years (r
0.764, P0.0001). b, Anterior fetal nucleus (flash intensity, 200 Wseconds) in 4 age groups. The mean difference using Bonferroni multiple comparison
is statistically significant for groups 2 and 3 (P0.0001) and for groups 3 and 4 (P0.0001). Error bars, minimum and maximum of the 95% confidence
interval.
2025
Figure 6. a, Posterior fetal nucleus (flash intensity, 200 Wseconds) as a function of age. A positive correlation was found after the age of 40 years (r
0.756, P0.0001). b, Posterior fetal nucleus (flash intensity, 200 Wseconds) in 4 age groups. The mean difference using Bonferroni multiple comparison
is statistically significant for groups 2 and 3 (P0.0001) and for groups 3 and 4 (P0.0001). Error bars, minimum and maximum of the 95% confidence
interval.
Figure 7. a, Crystalline lens thickness as a function of age. A positive linear correlation was found (r 0.679, P0.0001). b, Crystalline lens thickness
in 4 age groups. The mean difference using Bonferroni multiple comparison is statistically significant for groups 1 and 2 (P 0.002) and for groups 2 and
3 (P 0.004). Error bars, minimum and maximum of the 95% confidence interval.
2026
The 0.5 MTFs are 4.317 for group 1, 5.384 for group 2, 3.501 for
group 3, and 3.046 for group 4. A significant difference is seen
between groups 2 and 3 for 0.1 and 0.5 MTFs (P 0.009 and P
0.004, respectively).
Discussion
In the present study, we analyzed the densitometric changes
that take place in the crystalline lens with aging and how
these changes affect the optical quality of the eye. Densi-
2027
Figure 12. a, Spatial frequency for 0.1 modulation transfer function (MTF) in 4 age groups for a 5-mm pupil. The mean difference with Bonferroni
multiple comparison is statistically significant for groups 2 and 3 (P 0.009). b, Spatial frequency for 0.5 MTF in 4 age groups for a 5-mm pupil. The
mean difference using Bonferroni multiple comparison is statistically significant for groups 2 and 3 (P 0.004). c/d cycles per degree. Error bars,
minimum and maximum of the 95% confidence interval.
2028
eye, which suggests that the lens compensates for part of the
corneal aberrations. The corneal and lens aberrations show
a trend to compensate each other.17 In our study, we found
that this mechanism is disrupted in the older eye as a
consequence of normal aging. According to our data, the
turning point for the coupling of these 2 optical systems
(cornea and the entire eye) seems to appear around 40 years
of age. The changes in the optical performance of the
crystalline lens with aging should be related to the anatomical changes (nucleus density and thickness) found.
With previous studies, authors have investigated the correlation that the development of aberrometric changes has
with aging.1,2,15,16 In such studies, the Zernike polynomials
that were used differed from those analyzed in this study.
We found a linear correlation between intraocular spherical aberration and age. Because the main contributor to
intraocular aberration is the crystalline lens, we can assume
that spherical crystalline lens aberration increases with age.
On the other hand, intraocular coma aberration (Z31) decreases with age.
McLellan et al studied Z5i to Z7i and found a positive
correlation with age.1 Oshika et al studied corneal Z3iZ5i
and corneal Z4iZ6i. For Z3iZ5i, they found a positive
correlation with age, but for Z4iZ6i, no correlation was
found.16 Amano et al studied coma (Z31, Z31, Z51, Z51)
and spherical aberration (Z40, Z60).18 Brunette et al studied
ocular Z3iZ5iZ7i and ocular Z4iZ6i and found a secondorder regression for all aberrations.2 Artal et al studied Z4i
and Z3i and reported that corneal aberrations increased moderately with age. In addition, they reported that internal
surface aberrations showed a larger variability and a tendency to increase in middle-age and older subjects.19
Glasser and Campbell found in vitro that spherical aberration of excised older lenses changed.3 In this study, we
investigated corneal, ocular, and intraocular HOAs in the
same patient. We studied the overall corneal and ocular
HOAs, corneal and ocular Z4iZ6i, intraocular spherical
References
1. McLellan JS, Marcos S, Burns SA. Age-related changes in
monochromatic wave aberrations of the human eye. Invest
Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2001;42:1390 5.
2. Brunette I, Bueno JM, Parent M, et al. Monochromatic aberrations as a function of age from childhood to advanced age.
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2003;44:5438 46.
3. Glasser A, Campbell MC. Presbyopia and the optical changes
in the human crystalline lens with age. Vision Res 1998;38:
209 29.
4. Artal P, Ferro M, Miranda I, Navarro R. Effects of aging in
retinal image quality. J Opt Soc Am A 1993;10:1656 62.
5. Guirao A, Gonzalez C, Redondo M, et al. Average optical
performance of the human eye as a function of age in a
normal population. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1999;40:
20313.
6. Fujikado T, Kuroda T, Maeda N, et al. Light scattering and
optical aberrations as objective parameters to predict visual
deterioration in eyes with cataract. J Cataract Refract Surg
2004;30:1198 208.
7. Scammon RE, Hesdorffer MB. Growth in mass and volume of
the human lens in postnatal life. Arch Ophthalmol 1937;17:
104 12.
8. Weekers R, Delmarcelle Y, Luyckx J. Biometrics of the
crystalline lens. In: Bellows JG, ed. Cataract and Abnormalities of the Lens. New York: Grune & Stratton; 1975:134 47.
9. Brown N. Dating the onset of cataract. Trans Ophthalmol Soc
U K 1976;96:18 23.
10. World Medical Association. World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki. Ethical principles for medical research
involving human subjects. Available at: http://www.wma.net/
e/policy/b3.htm. Accessed September 2004.
11. Chylack LT Jr, Wolfe JK, Singer DM, et al, Longitudinal
Study of Cataract Study Group. The Lens Opacities Classification System III. Arch Ophthalmol 1993;111:831 6.
12. Bosem ME, Sample PA, Martinez GA, et al. Age-related
changes in the human lens: a comparison of Scheimpflug
photography and lens density index. J Cataract Refract Surg
1994;20:70 3.
13. Santamara J, Artal P, Bescos J. Determination of the point
spread function of human eyes using a hybrid optical-digital
method. J Opt Soc Am A 1987;4:1109 14.
14. Kashima K, Trus BL, Unser M, et al. Aging studies on normal
lens using the Scheimpflug slit-lamp camera. Invest Ophthalmol Visual Sci 1993;34:2639.
15. Calver RI, Cox MJ, Elliot DB. Effect of aging on the monochromatic aberrations of the human eye. J Opt Soc Am A Opt
Image Sci Vis 1999;16:2069 78.
16. Oshika T, Klyce SD, Applegate RA, Howland HC. Changes in
corneal wavefront aberrations with aging. Invest Ophthalmol
Vis Sci 1999;40:13515.
17. Artal P, Guirao A. Contributions of the cornea and the lens to
the aberrations of the human eye. Opt Lett 1998;23:17135.
18. Amano S, Amano Y, Yamagami S, et al. Age-related changes
in corneal and ocular higher-order wavefront aberrations.
Am J Ophthalmol 2004;137:988 92.
19. Artal P, Berrio E, Guirao A, Piers P. Contribution of the cornea
and internal surfaces to the change of ocular aberrations with age.
J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis 2002;19:137 43.
20. Altmann GE. Wavefront-customized intraocular lenses. Curr
Opin Ophthalmol 2004;15:358 64.
21. Llorente L, Barbero S, Merayo J, Marcos S. Total and corneal
optical aberrations induced by laser in situ keratomileusis for
hyperopia. J Refract Surg 2004;20:20316.
2029