Professional Documents
Culture Documents
BACKGROU:'IlD
PT Timah Tbk was the only state enterprise active in tin mining. Timah's
competitive edge was a result of the integration of each step in the process of
producing and marketing tin. The company was a cost leader. Control over
substantia I reserves, ownersh ip of the largest dredge fleet in the world and the use
of computer systems and satellite communications helped to minimize Timah
mining costs. The use of production systems ensured Timah's smelting operations
1
This case was written by Dr. Eduardus TandeWin of Master of Management Program Gadjah
Mada University, Yo!:''Yakarta, Indonesia. The author wishes to acknowledge research funding
from Master of Management Program, Gadjah Mada University. This case is intended as a basis
for class discussion rather than to illustrate either effective or ineffective handling a financial
matter at the firm. Any interpretation of the data as well as any errors or omission is the
responsibility of the author. Research assistance was provided by I Wayan Nuka Lantara and
Lukas Purwoto.
Copyright 2001. Allright reserved. This publication is protected by Copyright and permission
were highly efficient. The results claimed by management were that Timah
customers received the highest-quality tin available worldwide.
Geographically and geologically, Indonesia was a wealthy country. Across
the inland and offshore tin reserves controlled by Timah, the mineral deposits
were some of the best in the world. The company held tin exploration and mining
rights until 2025 of more than 10,000 square kilometers spread across several
islands and offshore areas in the Java Sea. Timah had secured rights for gold
exploration in North Sumatra, Kalimantan and Java. These rights extended over
27,000 square kilometers. Even after a long history of tin mining, a large portion
of Timah's mining rights were as yet unexplored and untapped. The future
appeared to hold vast potential for further mining.
At Mentok, in the northwest corner of Bangka, Timah established the
largest tin smelting operation in the world. Completed in 1967, the plant
underwent further increases in capacity with the addition of a seventh furnace,
which raised capacity to 50,000 tons in 1997. Adjacent to the smelting operations
was the largest of five washing plants operated by the company. The central
washery received tin concentrate from both offshore and onshore mining
operations. Using a number of different processes the tin concentrate was
upgraded to approximately 74% tin content. A small amount of heavy mineral
byproducts were generated by these operations and sold. Smelting at Mentok
produced crude molten tin and generated recyclable by-products known as dust
and hardhead. Crude tin was further refined in a smelting kettle. Waste from
refining, known as tin dross, was also recycled.
Since 1995 until the present, Timah has been achieving ISO-900 I and
ISO-1400 I in several production units. This effort would be continued for other
production units. Management considered that such certification was a must to
strengthen their global position as a world-class company.
SUBSIDIARIES OF TIMAH
As a Holding Company, Timah formed a center for the formulation and
control of corporate strategy, and ensured that synergy existed between the
operations of the various subsidiary companies in the process of creating and
adding value. Timah determined the overall corporate structure of the Group,
overall marketing strategies, budgets and allocation of funds. It managed
corporate finances and the financial affairs of its subsid\aries, it set the Group's
values and norms, and it determined the course of corporate development of its
subsidiaries through alliances and/or acquisition.
PT T AMBANG
TIMAH
PT TIMAH INDUSTRI
Timah Eksplomin was also founded in June 1998. The business provides
services in investigation of mining, mining, analysis of laboratory, conducting a
feasibility study, and investigation of technical geological and geohydrology.
Exploration of the areas of Banka and Belitung was conducted. The other
effort was finding the deep alluvial deposit. Moreover, core competence in the
exploration of the sea also opened a new market to Timah Explomin.
PT TIMAH INVESTASI MINERAL
FINANCIAL PERFORMANCE
Table 1 shows the summary of financial statement of Timah from 1997 to
1999. Management confessed that 1999 was a year full of challenges. Net profit
increased 19 I % to Rp518.8 billion in 1998, and then experienced "windfall
profit" in 1999. One factor to explain this is that the financial performance in 1998
was not real, but maybe just a result of the decline in rupiah value. Meanwhile in
1999, the increase in rupiah value tlppeared to negatively affect Timah' s
performance. However, management commented that the bad performance in
1999 had been caused by external factors such as economic conditions. 2
The financial performance of the fOl,lr subsidiaries of Timah also failed to
show satisfactory results. Highlights of the four subsidiaries' financial conditions
in 1999 are shown in table 2. Although three subsidiaries, Tambang Timah,
Timah Eksplomin, and Timah Industri, showed an increasing trend in sales, they
did not exhibit increases in net income. This was caused by the increase in the
subsidiaries' costs. For example, Timah Eksplomin had experienced an increase
from Rp 33.9 in 1998 to Rp 63,605 in 1999. However, the net income decreased
from Rp 1,943 million in 1998 to Rp 0,807 million in 1999.
326,413
lc~223
31,038
22,895
11,118
_ 2,632
340,163
251,651
120,792
437,552
809,995
415,567
8,483
82,544
151,051
13,993
2,384
431,944
251,651
120,792
892,597
1,265,040
326,842
4,709
59,051
97,394
17,465
2,007
-346,314
251,651
120,792
1,017,740
1,390,183
INCOME STATEMENTS
691,614
2,034,561 /
1,694,839
396,395
672,975
944,244
295,219
1,361,586
750,595
98,386
256,748
240,684
-.-------------------------------------_.-------------------------- .. _.. _---_ .. ----_.-._- .. --.--.
196,833
1/104,838
509,911
Net Sales
Cost of Goods Sold
Gross Profit
Operating Expenses
Operating Profit
Other Income (Expenses)
Profit before Taxes
Profit after Taxes
-------_._----------~------------------------------------.--.--.--.---.-----.---------_.-------.
_______________?-~~~?~
(~~~~?-~_~)
256,505
177,813
740,306
518,828
484,499
318,039
353
1,609
141
5,900
1,031
2,513
409
5,375
632
2,762
247
4,875
J~~!_~}?L
~
k.e.-l. n
~1-
5&
to U'D
() VSP
I>-~
'r:i .(M)
I
~O.OlID
1 8i'V5P
/blfOVf;)
-----
Ib.~
Ix
)
80.
cNO
1,201,007,545
Current Assets:
Cash on hand and in banks
Trade receivables
Inventories
--
,..
MINERAL
13,996,369
487,996,828
829,748
7,465,132
106,456
341,564
544,098
61,194,556
4,574,022
70,787,354
252,329,403
105,341,133
Investments
Fixed Assets-Net
PT TIMAH
PTTIMAH
INQUSTRI _ iNvESTASI
337,642,254
17,390,511
39,451,982
71,000
226,636,922
2,218,767
Other Assets
93,749,116
Total Assets
1,632,398,915
31,386,880
754,085,732
28,390,648
"Current Liabilities:
618,838,467
24,171,379
536,238,546
479,508
Trade payable
21,948,491
1,741,892
449,245
Taxes payable
91,504,236
835,548
30,047,038
4,712,471
21,070,405
242,023
1,122,864
13,419,831
Total Liabilities
639,908,872
24,413,402
537,361,410
13,907,078
Paid-Up capital
500,000,000
5,000,000
200,000,000
43,000,000
492,490,043
992,490,043
1,973,478
6,973,478
16,724,322
216,724,322
(28,516,431)
14,483,569
Long-term Liabilities
25,271,133
7,739
Total Equity
28,169
INCOME STATEMENTS
Net Sales
Cost of Goods Sold
1,664,589,743
63,605,571
320,800,867
920,729,043
55,863,182
310,043,396
---------.----~-
.. --------.--_.-----_. __ . __ ._----_._----._--.----.---_.-_.-----.--.--.--._-----."-----
Gross Profit
743,860,709
7,742,389
10,757,471
Operating Expenses
155,835,755
7,103,573
7,227,529
1,591,128
14,508,102
Unsuccessful Exploration
Operating Profit (loss)
-----588:b-i4~954-------------638:8i6-----------j:529~942-------(16;099j30y
(68,746,776)
998,584
2,559,752
519,278,178
1,637,400
6,089,694
._---------.--------.---.-----._-._------------------.------._--._-. __
68,636
._------~---------------------------
(16,030,594)
-----3s3:94-6;209--------------so7j-s6---------------92i'78i-------(16;030:5-94)-
Additional information:
Capital stock in shares
500,000
5,000
200,000
43,000
'---~
Sources:
1. PT Tambang Timah, Financial Statement, December 31,1999.
2. PT Tinlah Eksplomin, Financial Statement, December 31,1999.
3. PT Timah Industri, Financial Statement, December 31, 1999.
4. PT Tinlah Investasi Mineral and Subsidiary, Consolidated Financial Statement, December
L - ~,1999___ _
..
_
Table 3. Financial Ratios of Metal and Mineral Mining Companies on the JSX
PT AnekaTambangTbk
~.
~r-'
" '(.. ,
.'
1997
1998
243
1118
104
1625
6,68
1.45
42,71
6.39
2.99
0,44
0,30
056
0.47
0.29
3.44
052
15.14
21.75
1999
183
1195
79.19
1400
7.65
1.17
43.28
5.66
246
0.42
0.29
0.43
0.33
0.23
2.99
0.46
10.81
15.31
PT International Nickel
Indonesia Tbk
1997
178
4549
1999
156
4750
1998
45
4594
6800
38.17
1.49
-
2800
61.79
0.61
-
6300
40.45
1.33
-
177
074
0.42
0.25
0.23
0.14
2.24
0.16
2.26
3.92
1.00
0,99
0,50
0.06
0.06
0.04
2.51
0.12
072
1.02
051
0.18
0,17
0.10
2.99
0.16
162
3.28
Q')()
099
2000.
'7
Figure 1. Modified Du Pont Chart for Timah Tbk and Its Subsidiaries
Return on Equity
(ROE)
I
Return on Assets
(ROA)
Equity multiplier:
Assets/Equity
Multiplied by
Profit Margin:
Net income/Sales
SalesfTotal assets
Multiplied by
I
I
Sales
Divided
into
Net income
"Divided
Sales
by
Subtracted
from
Sales
Fixed
Assets
Added
to
f-
Taxes
Time
deposits
Cash on
hand and in
banks
I
Operating
costs
Current
Assets
I
Costs of
good sold
Total Assets
I
Total
Costs
f-
Other
expenses
Trade
receivable
Inventories
Questions:
1. Calculate some financial ratios for Timah Tbk for the last three years. (Include the
ratios of liquidity, asset management, leverage, profitability, and market value.)
2. Evaluate the financial condition of Tintah Tbk using trend analysis.
3. Evaluate the financial condition of Timah Tbk using benchmark analysis (Antam
Tbk., PGas Tbk.).
4. Construct a Du Pont system for Tintah Tbk to show how some key variables
interact to determine the rate of return on equity. More important, use your Du
Pont system to analyze ways of improving the firm's performance. How does Du
Pont differ from the previous ratio analysis?
5. Give suggestions to improve the subsidiaries' performance and the performance
of the overall company.
CUf('oO\.+ V"OL-\t.o
~"
&\dt. \"~o:
eu,r-t.,d
'"
!~J
~ - t\l~~IoV'lj
~v.rtl1.-t ~Clb,H~s.
(~tJ-t'1.~~
1'o~ ~t ~
'G,~
tto~ '\u~>lll~
'T.o~~~
'T()~ Mk&
e~ ITO A. ~et~1I\ :
--
'tf>IT9A
---:--{4CR.S
-roW 1\\s.J:$
-h-"'J
-hf'lU.J
Clfretr _
~.(~S"
:..
-hr't.t.
L
..
(.
~V'kt lJo.~