Curriculum design traditionally has focused on the
transmission of discrete pieces of information-frequently rote facts and formulas--from teacher to student. Because the information is considered important in its own right, traditional curriculum designers often pay little attention to whether or not students use the information in any real-life context. In this kind of curriculum, segregated "silos" of knowledge (labeled "disciplines") are used to impose order on information (Beane, 1991). In reality, most learning situations demand an integration of various kinds of knowledge, and information is considered valuable insofar as it fills an experienced desire or need for information. For example, to lose weight one would need information about nutrition, physiology, mathematics, and psychology. The need or desire to lose weight would determine how valuable the information is. Because traditional curriculum design does not reflect these realities, it often does not provide students with opportunities to develop the kinds of critical thinking skills and problem-solving abilities that are central to thinking and learning (Jones, Palinscar, Ogle, & Carr, 1987). Furthermore, traditional curriculum design does not include opportunities to build the kinds of personal and collaborative skills that support learning (Tinzmann, Jones, Fennimore, Bakker, Fine, & Pierce, 1990). A traditional curriculum is an educational curriculum which follows established guidelines and practices. This term can refer both to a curriculum as a whole, as in the set of courses which students must take to graduate and the order in which they are presented, and to the curriculum in the form of the content taught in an individual class. The traditional curriculum is sometimes criticized for being too narrow, and a number of education professionals have developed alternative educational methods, or suggestions for teaching a traditional curriculum in a more expanded way. In the sense of an entire curriculum, a traditional curriculum includes core subjects and electives. Core subjects usually include topics like math, science, history, and English. Students may also take courses in the social sciences, and can expand their curriculum with topics like art, foreign languages, music, acting, and so forth. The curriculum is designed in a progressive way, with each level being slightly more challenging than the
last, requiring students to build skills and use them as
their work their way through the curriculum. The traditional curriculum can also be heavily standardsbased, with testing used to measure accomplishment and progress. This practice has also been criticized by educations, as standards-based curricula can take on a teach to the test format in which students are provided with information which will help them pass a test, but not necessarily with information which they can use. For example, math education might be very based on learning set formulas and ways of doing math, but not on developing math skills which could be useful in real life. Traditional and Progressive Views of Education 1. Both traditional and progressive views of education take into account the needs of the student, the teacher, and the role of the curriculum. However, traditional and progressive forms of education differ greatly in their approach. In a traditional classroom, the teacher is an authority figure. The format of instruction is lecture-based with minimal opportunity for democratic participation although some question and answer sessions may follow the lecture. The teacher alone formulates the curriculum and students offer little if any input into the lesson plans. A traditional lesson plan will not include trendy issues or matters of popular culture. DESIGN CUR Follow these steps to design a training curriculum: 1. Select the content of the curriculum based on the goals and objectives you have defined. 2. Prioritize training topics. Tip : These priorities will determine when and how you offer the training.
3. Incorporate the training topics into an hourly
or daily schedule. 4. Decide what training exercises or methods to use.
Prog 5. Prepare a lesson plan for each hour or topic in the training course or workshop. Pic traditional
Teaching process
Learning process
Child or Learner-Centered Approach
Child or Learner-centered approach places the child at the center of education. It begins with understanding the educational contexts from which a child comes. It continues with the teacher evaluating the child's progress towards learning objectives. The curriculum is constructed based on the needs, interest, purposes and abilities of the learners. Teachers attempt to maximize student productivity, knowledge acquisition, skills augmentation and development of personal and professional abilities. Teachers may use a variety of instructional tools and methods, as well as flexible arrangements of time and place. This design considers the following: 1. A new respect for the child is fundamental. 2. A new freedom of action is provided. 3. The whole activity is divided into units of work. 4. The recognition of the need for using and exploring many media for self-discovery and self-direction is embraced. Subject-centered Approach This approach prescribes different and separate subjects into one broad field. The characteristics of the subject-matter, and the procedures, conceptual structures or relationships which are found within or among the subject-matter, dictate the kinds of activities that will be selected. Curriculum makers who are developing a curriculum organized around a given subjectarea; will look at the facts, concepts, and skills related to, or encompassed by, that subject area, and plan activities that will lead learners from their prior experiences into mastery of the elements of the subject area. This approach considers the following: The primary focus is the subject matter. The emphasis is on bits and pieces of information which are detached from life.
The continuing pursuit of learning outside
the school is not emphasized. Learning should only take place inside...