Professional Documents
Culture Documents
LESLIEG. JAEGER
Techtiical U~liversityof Nova Scorirr, Holifns, N.S.. Cntincl~~
B3J 2x4
AND
BAIDAR
BAKHT
Resenrch n t ~ dDeveloptnerlt Bratlch, Ministry of Tratlsportrrtiotl rirld Cot~~m~rt~icntiot~s,
Dowtlsview, OIII.,Catz~zdaM3M IJ8
Introduction
In recent years two methods have come increasingly
to the fore in the analysis and design of bridges. These
are the grillage analogy and the finite element methods.
This paper deals only with the first of these. In so
doing, no comparison between the two should be taken
to be implied. Both kinds of method have been used
many times in the past by bridge engineers, and both
will undoubtedly continue to be used in the future. At
the present stage in analysis and design of bridges, the
grillage analogy is extensively used and it is probable
that reason (c) given below is at least partially responsible for this popularity. It is undoubtedly true that
finite element methods, which are already supported by
a number of inexpensive and readily available computer
programs, will be increasingly popular in the future.
The grillage analogy method is well supported by the
published literature, among which may be mentioned
papers by Lightfoot (1964); Yettram and Husain
(1965); Sawko (1968a,b); Smyth and Srinavasan
(1973); and Hambly and Pennels (1975).
Reasons for the present popularity of the grillage
analogy method include the following.
225
/-
A SLAB ELEMENT
FIG.
TORSIONLESS DIAGONALS
FIG. 2. Slab idealization by grillages. Plans of: (a) actual slab bridges; (b) idealized grillages accounting for v ; ( c ) idealized
grillages ignoring v.
Slab bridges
Idealization of structure
A rectangular slab element subjected to loads perpendicular to its plane is equivalent in deformability to an
8 T kN LOAD A T B
FIG.3. Transverse moments in skew slabs. Experimental -(Rusch and Hcrgenrocdcr 1969); grid analogy --(output
modifled for Poisson's ratio).
-%I
[la]
I,
[L,
[I01
I,
[L. -
J, =
t3
24(1
F]
24(1 - v')
[ELl(~G- 3v)]
t'
34( 1
[ 1(11
J,
[EL,";
v')
3v)1
v')
t3
34(1
v')
I,
L,. t3/24
[20]
I,
L, t"24
JAEGER A N D BAKHT
227
F I G . 4. Moments in a cantilcvcr slab: -grillagc analogy; --- from Hombcrg and Ropers (1965).
J , = ( E I C )L, t '124
[2d]
In an assembly of orthogonal bearns, the moment in
a beam depends only upon the curvature of the assembly in the direction of the beam. The corresponding
moment in a slab depends not only upon the curvature
in the direction of the moment but also on the slab
curvature in the perpendicular direction. This slab
action is represented by the following equations for the
moments in the x and y directions, M, and M,. respectively.
EQUIVALENT
CONCENTRATED
LOAD
NODAL
20
18
16
14
12
paid to adjusting the size of the load for load representation. However, attention should be paid to the mesh
size in the vicinity of discrete bearings. Usually it will
be found that the mesh size is too fine compared with
the effective size of the bearings (which is obtained by
dispersing the actual area of the bearing at an angle of
45" to the middle surface of the slab). In such cases it
should be appreciated that the predicted moments are
higher than the actual ones.
10
U
C
,"
.
i
0 8
o6
00
4x4
8x8
12~12
16.16
m ~ m
24x24
Beam-and-slab bridges
Idealization
The idealization of a beam-and-slab bridge by an
assembly of interconnected beams seems to conform
more readily to engineering judgement than is the case
JAEGER A N D BAKHT
-4
k12"
SECTION A A
L/b
FIG.7. Effect of flange width on flexural rigidity. NOTES:w = mid-span deflection using full flange width by beam theory;
wr, = mid-span deflection by finite strip method; A = ( w - I V , , ) / W , , ; I" = 25.4 mm.
when the beams are absent, as in simple slab bridges.
The longitudinal members of the grillage are usually
positioned to coincide with the actual girders, and these
longitudinal members are given the properties of the
girders plus associated portions of the slab. which they
represent. The transverse medium, i.e., the deck slab,
is conceptually broken into a number of transverse
strips, and each strip is replaced by a beam. It is advisable to align the transverse grillage beams perpendicularly to the longitudinal beams, in which case the
properties of the transverse members are calculated in
the same way as for slab bridges. For example, the
moment of inertia, I,, of a transverse beam representing
a strip of length L , and thickness t is given by
where E, and G, are, respectively, the modulus of elasticity and shear modulus for the material of the deck
slab.
Reduction offle-xural rigidity due to shear lag
For composite structures, the moment of inertia of a
230
9.
1982
rounding nodes without taking into accoilnt the moments that are associated with the apportioning, as illustrated in Fig. 9. The neglect of these moments in the
longitudinal direction does not give rise to significant
errors. However, their neglect in the transverse direction can result in significant errors, especially when the
actual loads are applied on the cantilever portion of the
slab, or when the spacing between girders is large. If a
computer program is available that is capable of including these moments they should be taken into account. If
the computer program does not have this capability,
then in order to reduce the error resulting from the
neglect of moments in the apportioning of loads it is
advisable to extend the grillage transverse members to
the true boundary of the actual deck slab, and to introduce additional nodes in the transverse beams midway
between the longitudinal beams.
The effect of providing the additional nodes in the
transverse beams is illustrated in Fig. 10, which shows
mid-span girder moments in two grillage idealizations
of a beam-and-slab bridge. In one idealization, the
transverse beams have nodes only at their intersections
with the longitudinal members and, in the other: they
have additional nodes midway between girders. The
latter idealization, which is superior on account of
better load representation, provides results that are up to
9% different from those given by the former.
Cellular bridges
Idealization of cellular bridges, a transverse slice of
one of which is shown in Fig. 11, is in many ways
similar to that for beam-and-slab bridges. Longitudinal
grillage beams are usually placed coincident with webs
of the actual structure, and the transverse medium,
which consists of both the top and bottom flanges, is
represented by equally-spaced transverse grillage
beams. The properties of the longiti~dinalmenlbers are
JAECER A N D BAKHT
LOAD CASE 3
LOAD CASE 2
LOAD CASE 1
-t
ff
LOAD CASE 3
LOAD CASE 2
(1.7) (2.4)
(2.4)
(metresl
(2.4) (1.7)
N O T I O N A L JOINTSTO
BETTER REPRESENT
ACTUAL LOADS
FIG. 10. Effcct of additional nodes in transversc menlbers. Notcs for graph: -without
bctwcen girders; --- with notional joints in transverse beams between girdcrs.
I,. = L,(t, hi
+ ~zt~l~:)
12 L, E,
P,. G,
A,. = ---- -
l1I,(12Il I2
+ P , I ,1, + 11Pr121,
shear flows around the perimeter of the closed crosssection. Little shear reaches the intermediate webs and
even less reaches the cantilever slab overhangs. Hence
it is usual to exclude the intermediate webs and the
cantilever overhangs from consideration when calculating the torsional properties. The torsional rigidity of
the bridge is assumed to be uniformly distributed across
both the longitudinal and transverse sections. The total
torsional rigidity of a section is distributed amongst the
various grillage members in proportion to the width that
each member represents. For a longitudinal grillage
member representing a width L,, of the slab, the torsional inertia J , is given by:
The torsional inertia, J,, of a transverse beam repre4 , , ~ , b ~+, 1 2 21, ~ + n ~ : ~ ; senting length L, of the transverse medium, is given by:
2 ~ :
where E, and G, are as defined earlier and I , ,I,, I3 are [12]
J, = L,
the moments of inertia per unit length of the top flange,
L $ dsl(n, t)
bottom flange, and web, respectively.
where A, is the area enclosed by the median line of the
[4PlI,
Torsiorzal taigidities
Unlike the flexural properties, the torsional properties of grillage members cannot be calculated by isolating certain portions of the bridge and then assigning
their properties to the grillage beams. When the crosssection of a cellular structure is subjected to torsion, the
JAEGER A N D BAKHT
INTERMEDIATE
WEBS IGNORED
MEDIAN
/AREA
A,
MEDIAN
r L l N E
AREA A2
INTERMEDIATE DIAPHRAGMS,
ANY, IGNORED
FIG. 13. Areas considered in the calculation of torsional properties: ( a ) cross-section; (b) longitudinal section.
J,
L,. t , H'
FIG.
I,=(~,t'/12)-(.srt:/64)
Transverse ,fle.rural r i g i c i i ~
By contrast with cellular structures, the transverse
rigidity of a voided slab can be significantly affected by
Equations 14- 17 are applicable only to the voided portions of the bridge. For the solid slab portions, as they
exist over internal supports and near longitudinal free
edges, the properties of the grillage members sliould be
calculated similarly to those of the solid slab bridges.
t'P"
A,. = F,tL,
Torsiorznl rigiclities
An accurate determination of the torsional rigidities
requires complex analysis. The following simplified
equations, which are based on work by Elliott (1975),
provide a fairly accurate estimate of the torsional inertias, as demonstrated by Bakht et n / . (19810).
[17a]
J, = [I
[17b]
J,.
0.84(t,,/t)']L,.t3/6
[ I - 0.84(t,,/t)']L,,t3/6
B A K ~ I TB.,
. JAEGER.L. G . , CHEUNG,M. S.. and MUITI.
A. A. 198IB. The state of the art in analysis ofccllulnr and
voidcd slab bridgcs. Canadian Journal of Civil
Enginccring. 8, pp. 376-391.
CASSELL.A. C.. HOBBS.K. E., and BASU. A. K. 1970.
Properties of voidcd slabs. Unpublished report, Department of Civil Enginccring, Imperial College, University of
London, London. England.
CHEUNG,
M. S . , and CI-IAN,M. Y. T. 1979. Progra~nfor
finite strip analysis. Public Works Canada, Ottawa, Ont.
CUSENS,A. R., and PAMA,R. P. 1975. Bridgc tleck an;ilysis.
John Wilcy and Sons. London.
ELLIOTT.G . 1975. Stiffness parameters: Discussion of papcr
by Kinscy. Highway Enginccring Computer Branch, Department of the Environment Conference on Computerized
Bridgc Design, Bristol, pp. 4/48-4153.
F I R M I NA, , . GILMOR,M. E., and COLLINS,R. A. 1977.
Computcr programs for structural analysis and design, a
Canadian vicw. Canadian Journal of Civil Enginccring, 4.
pp. 72-85.
HAMBLY,E. C . , ;lnd PENNELLS.
E. 1975. Grillage analysis
applied to cellular bridge decks. The Structural Engineer,
53(7), pp. 267-275.
HOMBERG,
H., and ROPERS.W. 1965. Kragplattcn. beidscitigc cinzepanntc Platten Drcifeldplattcn vcrschicdcncr
Stutzwciten. (In German.) Springer Vcrlag, Berlin,
Germany.
JAEGER,L. G . . BAKHT,B., and MUITI, A. A. 1979. The
simplified analysis of cellular structures. Report submitted
to Department of Supply and Services, Ottawa. Ont.
LIGHTFOOT.
E. 1964. A grid kamework analogy for laterally
loaded plates. Journal of the Institution of Mechanical
Seicncc. 6 .
235
MASSONNET,
C . , and GANDOLFI.
A. 1967. Some exceptional
cascs in the theory of multigrade bridges. International
Association Tor Bridgc and Structural Enginccring Publication No. 27. Zurich.
BRIDGEDESIGNCODE. 1979. Ontario
ONTARIO
HIGHWAY
Ministry of Transportation and Communications, Downsvicw. Ont.
R u s c ~ .E. H. H.. and HERGENIIOEDER,
A. 1969. Influence
surfaces for moments in skew slabs. Werner-Verlag.
Dusseldorf, Gcrn~any.
S A W K ~F., 19680. Recent developments in the analysis of
steel bridges using electronic computers. British Constructional Steelwork Association Conference on Stcel Bridges.
London, pp. 1-10.
196811. Box improvement: Discussion on papcr by
D. A. Kcsensky. The Structural Enginccr, 46(7), p. 204.
SAWKO,F.. and WILCOCK,
B. K. 1967. Computcr analysis of
bridgcs having varying scction propcrties. The Structural
Engineer, 45(1 I), pp. 395-399.
SEN. R. 1974. Program for the grillage analysis of slab and
pseudo-slab bridge decks. Highway Enginccring Computcr
BranchjBj9. Department of the Environmcnt, London.
England.
SMYTH,W. J. I < . , and SRINAVASAN,
S . 1973. The analysis of
Gateshead Viaduct. The Structural Enginccr, 5(2), pp.
51-59.
YETTRAM.A. L., and Husi\li\l. M. H. 1965. A Gridframework method for pl;ltcs in flexure. ASCE Journal of
the Engineering Mechanics Division, 91(EM3), pp.
53-64.