Journal of Adolescence 53 (2016) 1e9

Contents lists available at ScienceDirect

Journal of Adolescence
journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/jado

Peer attachment and class emotional intelligence as

predictors of adolescents' psychological well-being: A
multilevel approach
Nekane Balluerka*, Arantxa Gorostiaga, Itziar Alonso-Arbiol, Aitor Aritzeta
University of the Basque Country UPV/EHU, Spain

a r t i c l e i n f o

a b s t r a c t

Article history:

The aim of the study was to analyze whether gender, age, peer attachment, and class-level
emotional intelligence could predict adolescents' psychological well-being by applying a
multilevel approach. The sample comprised 2182 secondary school students from the
Basque Country (northern Spain) (from 118 classrooms, 51.6% girls), aged between 12 and
18 years. A two-level model (with students nested into classes) was used to analyze the
inuence of three level-one covariates (gender, age, and peer attachment) and one leveltwo covariate (class-level emotional intelligence) on the positive affect component of
psychological well-being. The results showed an overall decrease in well-being as adolescents grow older, and an increase linked to a higher peer attachment. Furthermore,
class-level emotional intelligence showed a positive relationship with students' wellbeing. This group-level covariate also strengthened the effect of peer attachment on the
well-being. The advantages of using a multilevel approach for predicting mental health
and psychological adjustment are discussed.
2016 The Foundation for Professionals in Services for Adolescents. Published by Elsevier
Ltd. All rights reserved.

Keywords:
Well-being
Positive affect
Peer attachment
Class emotional intelligence
Gender
Multilevel approach

Like adults in the workplace, most adolescents spend a considerable amount of time of the day in a classroom. Apart from
learning academic-related contents, in this setting adolescents also acquire life skills and personal and emotional competences. Parental attachment has often been studied to help to explain adolescents' psychological well-being. Secure
attachment with parents is associated with several well-being outcomes, such as higher levels of self-esteem and life
satisfaction (e.g., Armsden & Greenberg, 1987; Gomez & McLaren, 2007), higher emotional and social competence (e.g., Laible,
2007; Muela, Balluerka, & Torres, 2013; Muela, Torres, & Balluerka, 2012), and higher emotion regulation (e.g., Allen & Miga,
2010). However, the specic role of peers at the individual and group-level has received less attention, despite the associations found between peer attachment and self-esteem (Gallarin & Alonso-Arbiol, 2012) and the results of other studies
indicating that the quality of peer relationships is also relevant to adolescents' development and adjustment (for an overview
see Allen, 2008). Due to adolescents' growing tendency to afliate with their peers (Hazan & Zeifman, 1994) and to get more
involved in peer group activities (Lerner & Steinberg, 2004), the impact of the emotional support adolescents receive from
their peers on their psychological well-being is undeniable. Nevertheless, the inuence of adolescents' perceptions of

* Corresponding author. Social Psychology and Behavioral Sciences Methods Department, University of the Basque Country UPV/EHU, Avda. de Tolosa n

n, Spain. Fax: 34 943015670.
70, 20018 San Sebastia
E-mail address: nekane.balluerka@ehu.eus (N. Balluerka).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.adolescence.2016.08.009
0140-1971/ 2016 The Foundation for Professionals in Services for Adolescents. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

N. Balluerka et al. / Journal of Adolescence 53 (2016) 1e9

emotional bonds with individual peers and of the group emotional climate is still an understudied area, especially in terms of
the positive affect component of psychological well-being. Witherspoon, Schotland, Way, and Hughes (2009) demonstrated
the value of applying a multilevel approach to examine adolescents' well-being, given the relevance of the independent and
joint effects of variables located in different contexts. To date, this approach has not been applied when studying the peers'
emotion-related sphere.
The present study aims to ll this gap in the literature by jointly investigating the emotional support an adolescent may
perceive at both an individual level (i.e., peer attachment) and group level (i.e., group emotional intelligence) in the classroom
context. We assess adolescents' positive affect component of well-being, testing different models that look at predictive
variables at both an individual and group level, as well as at the interaction between variables at these two levels.
Psychological well-being in adolescence
A current concern in the area of adolescents' mental health is the search for conditions that improve adolescent wellbeing, beyond the mere reduction/elimination of psychiatric symptoms (Huppert, Baylis, & Keverne, 2004). Subjective or
psychological well-being is regarded as one of the most relevant psychological characteristics associated with mental health
(Derdikman-Eiron et al., 2011).
Psychological well-being can be conceived as a multidimensional construct that includes both emotional and cognitive
elements (Salami, 2011). It is understood to be a self-evaluation involving both positive and negative affect, along with a more
cognitive element of the evaluation an adolescent makes of his/her satisfaction with life (e.g., Diener, Oishi, & Ryan, 2013;
Ronen, Hamama, Rosenbaum, & Mishely-Yarlap, 2014). Most researchers have examined the negative aspects of psychological well-being (e.g., Moksnes & Espnes, 2012), but the investigation of its positive aspects is no less important (AlonsoArbiol, Abubakar, & Van de Vijver, 2014). This latter approach, examining the element of positive affect, is the one adopted
in the present study.
Adolescence is a period marked by notable changes of a physical, cognitive and socio-emotional nature; at an emotional
level, mood changes and emotionally charged events are common at this stage of life (Rosenblum & Lewis, 2003). Thus, in a
context in which adolescents start distancing themselves from their parents, they may benet from the emotional support
they receive from peers, in order to enhance the positive affect aspect of their subjective well-being (Allen, 2008).
Peer attachment and psychological well-being
Several authors have observed links between attachment security of adolescents and different aspects of their psychological well-being. For instance, peer attachment in adolescence is associated with well-being outcomes such as self-esteem
(Gallarin & Alonso-Arbiol, 2012; Gomez & McLaren, 2007) and life satisfaction (Abubakar et al., 2013; Nickerson & Nagle,
2004). These studies back up a line of research that bases adolescents' psychological well-being, at least partly, on the
emotional support obtained from peers.
The theory of attachment emphasizes the importance of interpersonal relationships between children and their primary
caregivers in shaping individuals' views of themselves and of the world around them during the early stages of life (Bowlby,
1969). Early patterns of interaction with attachment gures become organized into generalized patterns by the time a person
reaches late adolescence (Bowlby, 1973). In adolescence, the exploration is more likely to focus on an individual's emotional
and cognitive autonomy (Allen, Hauser, Bell, & O'Connor, 1994), and this is also a time when attachment functions begin to be
transferred; close friends become attachment gures for adolescents even if they maintain strong attachment relationships
with their parents (Abubakar et al., 2013; Gallarin & Alonso-Arbiol, 2013; Kerns, Tomich, & Kim, 2006). Nelis and Rae (2009)
stressed the importance of peer attachment and explored the role and functions of peers as attachment gures in adolescence. At this developmental stage, peers start fullling attachment functions of proximity seeking and safe haven (Nickerson
& Nagle, 2005); support is provided when adolescents' attachment system is activated and teens start feeling reluctant to
return to parents for comfort at those times of distress.
Peer attachment is understood as being a specic bond established with one or a few peers, as opposed to other dimensions of friendship quality, such as conict resolution, conict betrayal, help and guidance, and companionship and
recreation (Parker & Asher, 1993). While friendship quality has been observed as being related to well-being in adolescents

, de Matos, Camacho, Simoes, & Diniz, 2014), these authors underline the fact that provision of satisfaction of basic
(e.g., Tome
(emotional) psychological needs dpeer attachmentd is somehow behind the association between quality friendship and

and associates, classmates' support also contributes to well-being.
happiness. Likewise, according to Tome
Class emotional intelligence and psychological well-being
Although group Emotional Intelligence (EI) is a well-known construct in the eld of work and organizational psychology
rtel, Ashkanasy, & Zerbe, 2009), research on group emotions, and specically on group EI, is still scarce. The class-type EI
(Ha
examined here represents a group-level emotional trait that is based on subjective emotional experiences shared by the class
members. It may be dened as The perception of the students about the way in which their class pays attention to and values
the feelings of classmates, is clear rather than confused about the emotions felt in the class and uses positive thinking to repair
negative moods in the class. (Balluerka, Aritzeta, Gorostiaga, Gartzia, & Soroa, 2013, p. 112). Class EI differs from classroom

N. Balluerka et al. / Journal of Adolescence 53 (2016) 1e9

emotional climate in that the latter refers to the quality of social and emotional interactions in the classroom between and
among students and teachers, for example, teacher and peer support, teachers' disciplinary style and school rules (Pianta, La
Paro, & Hamre, 2008). Class emotional intelligence, however, focuses only on the interaction between students that takes
place in a natural group and takes into account only emotional aspects. Therefore, class EI may be understood as being part of
the broader construct of the classroom emotional climate.
As in other educational systems around the world, in the Basque Country (in northern Spain), students stay with the same
classmates from pre-school until high school, when they spend more than 70% of the time with the same classmates. Specically, they share 100% of the time with their classmates in pre-school and a minimum of 70% of the time in high school
depending on the optional subjects they choose each academic year. This makes the class a fundamental group of reference. In
this context emotions are regarded as essential for exploring classroom interactions and for understanding patterns of
motivation and learning among students (Beilock & Ramirez, 2011). In fact, some studies have found that what motivates
students in the classroom, and the ways in which motivation is related to cognition, are both associated with the development
of affective relationships with peers (Pintrich, 2003). A large body of evidence also shows how the establishment of a positive,
caring and encouraging learning environment can transform students' patterns of feelings, behavior, resilience and academic
diligence (Lovat & Toomey, 2009). This includes not just feelings associated with success or failure, but also the sense of
acceptance or rejection by others (Graham, 1991). Furthermore, research examining class emotional climate has shown that
consistently negative and non-supportive climates are usually associated with avoidance, disruptive and cheating behavior,
whereas supportive ones are associated with goal motivation (Patrick, Turner, Meyer, & Midgley, 2003). The conclusion to be
drawn from these ndings is that the positive or negative emotional climate in a class generates a group level component of
shared emotional experience that can be particularly relevant for students' positive affect component of psychological wellbeing. Thus, one might expect this adolescents' type of psychological well-being to be inuenced by the emotional climate of
the group in which they spend most of their time, and in which they interact publicly with their peers.
Age, gender and psychological well-being
Besides emotion-related variables, demographic variables (i.e. age and gender) will also be analyzed here, as these are key
variables in understanding how adolescents' subjective well-being develops (Casey, Jones, & Somerville, 2011; Steinberg,
2013). Age is an important variable that needs to be acknowledged in the prediction of well-being. The results of previous
work are inconclusive; although most studies examining the positive elements of adolescents' subjective well-being have
observed a negative association with age (e.g., Huebner, Suldo, Valois, & Drane, 2006; Ronen et al., 2014), exceptions to this
rule have also been reported (e.g., Salami, 2011).
Regarding gender, the specic conceptualization of psychological well-being may evidence differences. While problemrelated well-being seems to be gender-specic, with girls displaying more internalized problems and boys more externalized problems (for an overview, see Azkargorta, Palacios, & Gallarin, 2009), other conceptualizations produce different
outcomes and gender differences do not always appear. On the one hand, there is evidence that adolescent girls score higher
on the positive aspects of subjective well-being, either for the cognitive-type life satisfaction (e.g., Huebner, Drane, & Valois,
2000) or for positive affect (e.g., Ronen et al., 2014), which is the focus of the present study. Ronen et al. suggest that this
gender effect would be a consequence of females' greater ability to express stronger and more complex emotions. However,
other researchers have reported no gender differences in the positive affect element of well-being (Lang & Tisher, 1978). Thus,
although we do not propose specic hypotheses regarding age and gender, these variables will also be included in the
multilevel models in order to control their possible effects.
Hypotheses
In the present study, we tested some models of the independent and combined effects of peer attachment and class EI on
psychological well-being, and where age and gender were also included as individual-level variables. We expected peer
attachment to have a positive association with the positive affect type of well-being (Hypothesis 1). At a class-level, we also
expected that being part of a group with a high level of EI would generate an emotional context which favors psychological
well-being (Hypothesis 2). Lastly, although we have not found studies on the cross-level interaction between peer attachment
and group (class-level) EI, we might expect class-level EI to strengthen the possible positive relationship between peer


attachment and positive affect type of psychological well-being (Hypothesis 3). This prediction derives from ndings by Tome
et al. (2014), who observed, rstly, that adolescents having special friends (i.e., peers functioning as attachment gures)
reported receiving more support from classmates, and secondly, that well-being levels were higher when the friendship bond
was greater.
Method
Participants
The study sample comprised 2182 adolescents (1127 females and 1055 males) aged between 12 and 18 years (M 14.51;
SD 1.55). They attended 14 secondary schools in the Basque Country (northern Spain) and were grouped into 118 different

N. Balluerka et al. / Journal of Adolescence 53 (2016) 1e9

classes. Regarding school level, 22.5% of the sample were in their rst year of Compulsory Secondary Education, 21% in the
second year, 20.7% in the third year, 15.8% in the fourth year and 20% were attending the rst year of Post-Compulsory
Schooling. It must be pointed out that in the Basque Educational system, high school students share a minimum of 70% of
the time with their classmates depending on the optional subjects they choose each academic year. Schools were selected
from the population of non-university educational establishments from the Autonomous Community of the Basque Country
afliated to a private association of centers whose language of instruction is Basque. After informing the schools in the association about the aims of the study, those that expressed an interest in participating were included.
Measures
Peer attachment
Peer Attachment was assessed via the Inventory of the Parent and Peer Attachment (IPPA; Armsden & Greenberg, 1987) in
its Basque version (Alonso-Arbiol, Balluerka, et al., 2014). This inventory measures adolescents' attachment security towards
signicant other gures (mother, father and peers), implying specically the emotional aspects that help create or foster
bonds with such gures, as opposed to other dimensions of friendship quality in the case of peers. The present study used
only the peer version, which comprises 18 items to be rated on a 5-point Likert scale regarding applicability to the participant,
when referring to his/her friends (1 Never or hardly ever, 5 Always or almost always). An example of an item would be: I
can count on my friends when I need to get something off my chest.. Alonso-Arbiol, Balluerka, et al. (2014) found the
reliability and validity of the IPPA in its Peer form to be adequate in two large samples of adolescents. Regarding factor
validity, an underlying one-factor structure was conrmed: CFI 0.94, TLI 0.93, and RMSEA 0.06. Its reliability is supported by its adequate internal consistency (alpha coefcient 0.93) and adequate temporal stability (test-retest
correlation 0.69) (Alonso-Arbiol, Balluerka, et al., 2014). In the present study sample, the alpha coefcient was 0.92.
Class emotional intelligence
The Basque Group Trait Meta-Mood Scale (G-TMMS; Aritzeta et al., 2016) was used, which includes 16 items to be
answered on a 5-point Likert scale, with options ranging from Strongly disagree to Strongly agree. It assesses the extent to
which, on average, students in a stable class perceive that their group attends to and values their feelings, feels clear rather
than confused about these feelings, and uses positive thinking to repair negative group moods (e.g., In this class we pay
attention to how we feel). As a self-perceived measure, it does not reect real abilities in themselves but the subjective
perception of emotional traits. The G-TMMS has shown adequate reliability and validity in a population of classes at secondary school level (Aritzeta et al., 2016). Specically, it has shown an underlying one-factor structure, adequate internal
consistency (alpha coefcient 0.84), temporal stability (test-retest correlation 0.87), convergent validity and external
validity based on relationships of Group EI with academic achievement, percentage of girls in the class, and class tutor gender
(Aritzeta et al., 2016). In the present study sample, the alpha coefcient was 0.85.
Positive affect of psychological well-being
Positive affect was measured using the Positive dimension of the Children's Depression Scale (CDS; Lang & Tisher, 1978) in
its short Basque version (Balluerka & Gorostiaga, 2012). The CDS is a self-report tool that globally assesses depression in
children and adolescents aged between 8 and 16 years, but also focuses on the positive (protective) factor of psychological
well-being. Only the Positive dimension was used in the present study. The short Basque version was developed from the
longer Basque version of the scale (Balluerka, Gorostiaga, & Haranburu, 2012) and consists of 37 items to be answered on a 5point Likert scale, with options ranging from Strongly agree to Strongly disagree. The Positive dimension, comprising 10
items, refers to happiness, fun and joy in the life of the child or to the child's ability to experience these feelings (e.g., I think
that my mother/father is very proud of me). If the items are reversed, this dimension reects deep sadness or a lack of wellbeing in the child's life but in their direct form the items reect subjective or psychological well-being based mainly on selfcompetence and on relationships with family. The short Basque version of the CDS has adequate psychometric properties
(Balluerka & Gorostiaga, 2012). The two-factor model showed an adequate t, with values of CFI (0.92), TLI (0.91) and RMSEA
(0.07). The alpha coefcient for the Positive dimension was 0.84, and the test-retest Pearson correlation value was 0.73
(Balluerka & Gorostiaga, 2012). In the present study sample, the alpha coefcient was 0.84.
Procedure
Data were collected in whole-group classroom sessions during normal school days by two psychologists. Informed consent
was obtained from the school authorities, the pupils and their parents, and the study was approved by the Ethics Committee
for Research Involving Humans of the University of the Basque Country. In the course of data collection, the tools were
administered in the following order: IPPA, TMMS-G and CDS.
Data analysis
Data were analyzed using the SPSS MIXED procedure and by applying a multilevel regression model (Raudenbush & Bryk,
2002). The full information maximum likelihood was used as an estimation method. We began by specifying the null (or no

N. Balluerka et al. / Journal of Adolescence 53 (2016) 1e9

predictors) model (Model 0) and continued by building a random intercept model with gender, age and peer attachment as
level-1 covariates (Model 1). Class-level EI was included as a level 2 covariate in the next model (Model 2). This second-level
covariate was created by averaging the scores in the G-TMMS from individuals belonging to the same class. In order to ensure
that mean scores adequately represented emotional intelligence at the class level (e.g., class emotional intelligence) and that
students belonging to the same class had similar perceptions about the construct, James indexes of inter-coder reliability
(James, Demaree, & Wolf, 1993) were previously calculated. We then added one randomly varying slope to the model (Model
3) and nished by specifying a more complex random slope and intercept model, including one interaction term between
class level EI and peer attachment (Model 4). All the covariates were centered on the grand mean.
The estimated values and standard errors of the xed parameters and variance components were calculated for each
model, as was the deviance (the t of the model). To establish which of the models showed the best t to the data, the
difference between the deviance values was divided by the difference between the degrees of freedom. If the initial model
constitutes a reduced version of the subsequent model, this ratio follows a chi-squared distribution with as many degrees of
freedom as the number of parameters in the extended model minus the number in the reduced model. As the large sample

mez, & Hidalgo, 2005; Balluerka, Vergara, &
size used in this study made it easier to reach statistical signicance (Balluerka, Go
Arnau, 2009), the proportions of variance accounted for at individual and at class level by predictive variables were estimated
as effect size indexes.
Results
The results of the multilevel regression models described above, with positive affect of psychological well-being score as
the criterion variable, are displayed in Table 1. The rst model, the intercept-only model (Model 0), served as a baseline and
showed that the total variance was divided into two parts: 31.8 at student level and 4.59 at class level. This information was
then used to calculate the intra-class correlation coefcient, in other words, the proportion of variance accounted for at class
level. It was calculated as the ratio of between-subject variance to the total variance. This coefcient indicated that
approximately 13% of the total variability in positive affect scores occurred between classes. The next model (Model 1)
showed that gender, age and peer attachment explained a substantial part of this variation at the individual (8.9%) and class
(62%) levels, substantially improving the t of the model (Dc2/Ddf 88.3; p  0.0001). Age had a negative relationship with
adolescents' positive affect, indicating that adolescents felt worse as they grew older. Regarding gender, in our sample positive
affect was higher for female adolescents than for males. As for peer attachment, an increase in positive affect type of wellbeing linked to a higher attachment was observed, thereby conrming Hypothesis 1.
Regarding class EI, the values for the James index of inter-coder reliability ranged between 0.83 and 0.97, suggesting that
students belonging to each class had quite similar perceptions about the class-level EI. When this variable was included in the
model (Model 2) the t again improved notably (Dc2/Ddf 15.61; p  0.005). This explanatory variable had a major inuence
on the positive affect score, considerably reducing the variance component at the class level (22%). As expected, and as in the

Table 1
Models with peer attachment and class-level emotional intelligence as predictors of positive affect of well-being.
Effect
Fixed effects
Intercept (g00)
Individual-level variables
Gender
Age
Peer attachment
Class-level variables
Class-level EI (GEI)
Interactions
Class-level EI x Peer Attachment
Variance components
Within-subject (s2 e)
Between-subjects (t00) Intercepts
Between-subjects (t31) Slopes
Intercepts-Slopes Covariance (t03)
Model t
Model deviance
D Deviance (1e0)
D Deviance (2e1)
D Deviance (3e2)
D Deviance (4e3)
D df

Model 0

Model 1

Model 2

Model 3

Model 4

38.39 (0.23)

39.40 (0.22)

39.41 (0.21)

39.40 (0.21)

39.37 (0.21)

1.87* (0.25)
1.14** (0.10)
0.16** (0.01)

1.87* (0.25)
1.06** (0.10)
0.16** (0.01)

1.86* (0.25)
1.06** (0.10)
0.16** (0.01)

1.84* (0.25)
1.06** (0.10)
0.16** (0.01)

0.16** (0.04)

0.15** (0.04)

0.15** (0.04)
0.009* (0.003)

31.80** (0.99)
4.59** (0.84)

28.97** (0.91)
1.75** (0.45)

28.95** (0.91)
1.36** (0.39)

28.36** (0.91)
1.39** (0.40)
0.005* (0.002)
0.01 (0.02)

28.35** (0.91)
1.40** (0.40)
0.004*(0.002)
0.01 (0.02)

13,771.02

13,506.03
265**

13,490.42

13,482.95

13,476.93

15.61*
7.47
3

6.02*
1

Note. All predictor variables were centered over the grand mean. Standard errors are listed parenthetically; g00 Population mean of the average intercept;
s2 e Within-subject variance; t00 Variance of the intercepts (between-subjects variance); t31 Variance of the slopes (between-subjects variance);
t03 Covariance between intercepts and slopes.
*p < 0.05, **p < 0.0001.

N. Balluerka et al. / Journal of Adolescence 53 (2016) 1e9

case of peer attachment, there was a positive relationship between class EI and adolescents' positive affect of well-being,
thereby conrming Hypothesis 2.
Since peer attachment was signicantly related to positive affect, in the next model we decided to test whether this slope
(i.e., the relationships between peer attachment and positive affect) varied across classes. Model 3 showed that allowing the
slope to vary randomly did not improve the t of the model: all the xed effects showed similar values to those in the previous
model and the covariance between the intercept and the slope was negligible. However, the variance component for the slope
between peer attachment and positive affect was statistically signicant. Finally, in Model 4, we introduced the cross-level
interaction between class-level EI and peer attachment in order to examine whether the positive relationship of peer
attachment with positive affect was inuenced by this contextual-level covariate. The interaction term was statistically
signicant and the t of the model improved (Dc2/Ddf 6.02; p  0.02). Thus, class-level EI did strengthen the inuence of
peer attachment on positive affect, supporting the effect we had tentatively anticipated in Hypothesis 3.
Discussion
In the present study we assessed the combined effect of two variables of affective type d peer attachment and class
emotional intelligence d over adolescents' positive affect component of psychological well-being. Gender and age effects
were observed, with girls and younger adolescents showing higher levels of psychological well-being of a positive emotional
nature.
The positive relationship observed between class EI and positive affect is consistent with the results obtained in studies
based on ow theory (Patrick et al., 2003) and in studies that focus on students' coping behavior and classroom interactions
(Monroe & Harkness, 2011). Thus, in agreement with other authors (Avant, Gazelle, & Faldowski, 2011), our ndings conrm
that class emotional intelligence is associated with psychological adjustment. We believe this nding should be seen within
the wider framework of school climate. In fact, an increasing body of research on school climate supports the inuence of a
good school climate on various aspects of well-being, including academic outcomes, self-efcacy, behavioral problems and
also problems related to anxiety and depression (Thapa, Cohen, Guffey, & Higgins-D'Alessandro, 2013). While studies of
school climate take into account various elements of the school environment (teachers' disciplinary style, school rules, relationships with other students and with teachers, and so on), the class EI perspective focuses only on the natural group in
which the student most frequently interacts, and takes only emotional aspects into account. This facilitates the analysis of
specic sources of well-being related to emotional aspects, self-concept and life satisfaction.
This study corroborates the results of previous research (e.g., Allen, 2008; Gallarin & Alonso-Arbiol, 2013) which found a
relation between good peer attachment and a higher level of general psychological well-being, and it also demonstrates that
class emotional intelligence exerts a magnifying effect. Processes of individuation and identity formation take place during
adolescence; adolescents start to differ from their parents and grow closer to their peers (Shaffer & Kipp, 2007). It should be
noted, though, that identity development (or individuation) involves the establishment of an autonomous sense of self and at
the same time the development and maintenance of close relationships with others (e.g., Grotevant & Cooper, 1985). Healthy
identity exploration and achievement involves the simultaneous processes of developing an autonomous self within the
context of close relationships with peers (e.g., Grotevant & Cooper, 1985; see also Cleveland & Reese, 2005), and of attending
to a broader group in which the adolescents feel a need to be accepted and to be a part of (class). This may help to explain why
both aspects (i.e. peer attachment and class-level EI) jointly contribute to improving adolescents' positive affect type of
psychological well-being, as shown by the cross-level interaction between them.
Although not a key issue in this research, we observed that female adolescents show a better psychological well-being
than their male counterparts, as other researchers also focusing on positive affect have previously reported (e.g., Ronen
et al., 2014). It is surprising that our results conict with those of Lang and Tisher (1978), since we used the same conceptualization/instrument as they did and we also focused on positive affect; the discrepancy in the results may be due to crosscultural differences between their Australian adolescent sample and our Spanish sample. While Ronen and associates used
Watson, Clark and Tellegen's (1988) Positive and Negative Affect Schedule (PANAS, adapted for children/adolescents by
Laurent et al., 1999) which comprises (context-unrelated) words describing feelings, Lang and Tisher (1978) used full
statements referring to specic contexts. The latter option is more susceptible to cultural variation, because it is contextdependent and dimensionality-dependent.
Lang and Tishers (1978) positive dimension taps the positive affect element of subjective well-being with ten items, of
which four revolve around family relationships, two refer to self, two refer to the school context, and the last two are mixed. In
the Spanish context family values are highly regarded and the strong connections with the family reect that parental
affection is important for adolescents' adjustment (Martnez & Garca, 2007). In Spanish samples, positive (cognitive) wellbeing based on self-concept and self-competence has been found to be greater in male adolescents than in females (e.g.,

mez, & Suarez Ortega, 2010; Pastor, Balaguer, & Garca-Merita, 2003), while conceptualizations
Padilla-Carmona, Garca Go
made to capture well-being with regard to family relations or to school climate usually produce higher levels in girls
(Amezcua & Pichardo, 2000; Padilla-Carmona et al., 2010). As the positive dimension used in the present study with Spanish
adolescents contains more items that focus on family relations than on self-concept or self-competence, it is not surprising
that girls evidence a higher level of well-being.
Regarding age, another variable that is not central to this study but is also explored, our ndings corroborate previous
reports of a negative association between age and general well-being (Huebner et al., 2006), also when positive affect is

N. Balluerka et al. / Journal of Adolescence 53 (2016) 1e9

specically examined (Ronen et al., 2014), as we did in our study. However, Salamis (2011) study did not reveal this link
between age and well-being. This may derive from the specic conceptualization that this author uses in his study. He
adapted Ryff and Keyes' (1995) denition of positive psychological functioning from adulthood to adolescence, and which
taps six dimensions: 1) environmental mastery, 2) autonomy, 3) personal growth, 4) purpose in life, 5) positive relations with
others, and 6) self-acceptance. In adulthood it has been found that the two rst dimensions increase with age, while the third
and fourth decrease and the last two remain constant (Ryff, 1989). Thus, it is not surprising that results provided through a
composite combining all these six components may hide age uctuations in adolescence. In fact, it must be mentioned that in
Western-based countries, a U-type curve has been described to depict the decrease of subjective well-being in adolescence
(Dolan, Peasgood, & White, 2008; Ronen et al., 2014), probably as a consequence of the increased stressors that adolescents
perceive during their struggle with identity formation.
The study has a number of limitations that should be mentioned. The rst is the mono-method bias. Although the use of
questionnaires to evaluate psychological well-being and emotional intelligence is a customary practice, the relationships
between variables measured with the same method may be inated due to the action of common method variance.
Furthermore, the results of studies on psychological well-being may be affected by social desirability (Ronen et al., 2014).
Future studies should include other assessment methods.
A second limitation of the study is that its correlational nature prevents us from determining the direction of the effect
with complete certainty. We have argued that individuals who evidence good peer attachment may be capable of leading a
happier life. However, it is also possible that students who report higher levels of positive affect type of well-being may nd it
easier to afliate with peers.
Furthermore, the relevant variables of the study are at peer level. It would be interesting to develop a study in which the
models include the analysis of covariates located in multiple contexts, as in Witherspoon et al.s (2009) study, in which the
authors simultaneously analyzed the effects of family, neighborhood and school variables on adolescents' well-being.
Finally, in order to explain and predict classroom experiences in more compelling ways, it would be interesting to assess
classroom emotional phenomena from both the classroom emotional climate perspective (Pianta et al., 2008) and the class EI
perspective (Aritzeta et al., 2016). This trend in research could help highlight the importance of classroom emotional relationships in the development of emotional types of well-being among young people.
While acknowledging these limitations, the study nevertheless demonstrates that both peer attachment and class EI are
important for predicting adolescents' positive affect type of well-being, recalling previous studies that conrm the positive
effects of same-age referents: peers in one-to-one relationships (e.g., Abubakar et al., 2013; Allen, 2008) or the group as a
provider of emotional support (Lovat, Toomey, & Clement, 2010). Furthermore, it provides a way of explaining differences in
adolescents' psychosocial adaptation by considering the class as a relevant context of reference, which has not been studied in
depth in the educational eld. In this regard, our study offers a rst instance of the suitability of promoting activities that
enhance group EI e an extended practice in organizational settings - in the school context.
Acknowledgements
This research was partially funded by a grant from the Research Bureau of the University of the Basque Country (General
Funding for Research Groups, GIU14/18) and a grant from the Spanish Ministry of Economy and Competitivity (PSI201235471).

References
Abubakar, A., Alonso-Arbiol, I., Van de Vijver, F. J., Murugami, M., Mazrui, L., & Arasa, J. (2013). Attachment and psychological well-being among adolescents
with and without disabilities in Kenya: The mediating role of identity formation. Journal of Adolescence, 36, 849e857. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.
adolescence.2013.05.006.
Allen, J. (2008). The attachment system in adolescence. In J. Cassidy, & P. Shaver (Eds.), Handbook of Attachment: Theory, research and clinical applications
(2nd ed., pp. 419e435). New York, NY: The Guilford Press.
Allen, J. P., Hauser, S. T., Bell, K. L., & O'Connor, T. G. (1994). Longitudinal assessment of autonomy and relatedness in adolescent-family interactions as
predictors of adolescent ego development and self-esteem. Child Development, 65, 179e194. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/1131374.
Allen, J., & Miga, E. (2010). Attachment in adolescence: A move to the level of emotion regulation. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 27, 181e190.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0265407509360898.
Alonso-Arbiol, I., Abubakar, A., & Van de Vijver, F. J. R. (2014). Parenting practices and attachment as predictors of life satisfaction of mainstream Dutch and
Moroccan-Dutch adolescents. In R. Dimitrova, M. Bender, & F. J. R. van de Vijver (Eds.), Global perspectives on well-being in immigrant families (pp.
291e309). New York, NY: Springer.
Alonso-Arbiol, I., Balluerka, N., Gorostiaga, A., Aritzeta, A., Gallarin, M., & Haranburu, M. (2014). Attachment dimensions in adolescence: An adaptation of the
Inventory of Parent and Peer Attachment (IPPA) into Basque. Estudios de Psicologa. Studies in Psychology, 35, 359e386. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/
02109395.2014.922254.

nero en autoconcepto en sujetos adolescentes [Gender differences in self-concept in adolescent
Amezcua, J. A., & Pichardo, M. C. (2000). Diferencias de ge
subjects]. Anales de Psicologa, 16, 207e214.
Aritzeta, A., Balluerka, N., Gorostiaga, A., Alonso-Arbiol, I., Haranburu, M., & Gartzia, L. (2016). Classroom emotional intelligence and its associations with
school performance. European Journal of Education and Psychology, 9, 1e8. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ejeps.2015.11.001.
Armsden, G., & Greenberg, M. (1987). The Inventory of Parent and Peer Attachment: Individual differences and their relationship to psychological wellbeing in adolescence. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 16, 427e451. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF02202939.
Avant, T. S., Gazelle, H., & Faldowski, R. (2011). Classroom emotional climate as a moderator of anxious solitary children's longitudinal risk for peer
exclusion: A child x environment model. Developmental Psychology, 47, 1711e1727. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0024021.

N. Balluerka et al. / Journal of Adolescence 53 (2016) 1e9

Azkargorta, A., Palacios, I., & Gallarin, M. (2009). Generoaren araberako psikopatologia-ezberdintasunak haur eta nerabeengan [Children and adolescents
psychopathology differences grouped by gender]. In I. Alonso-Arbiol, & M. Gallarin (Eds.), Generoa aztergai Psikologian: Egungo ikerketak [Gender analysis
in Psychology: Current researches] (pp. 31e57). Bilbao: UEU.
Balluerka, N., Aritzeta, A., Gorostiaga, A., Gartzia, L., & Soroa, G. (2013). Emotional intelligence and depressed mood in adolescence: A multilevel approach.
International Journal of Clinical and Health Psychology, 13, 110e117. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1697-2600(13)70014-0.

mez, J., & Hidalgo, M. D. (2005). The controversy over null hypothesis signicance testing revisited. Methodology. European Journal of
Balluerka, N., Go
Research Methods for the Behavioral and Social Sciences, 1, 55e70. http://dx.doi.org/10.1027/1614-1881.1.2.55.

n de versiones reducidas de instrumentos de medida: una perspectiva pra

ctica [Elaboration of reduced
Balluerka, N., & Gorostiaga, A. (2012). Elaboracio

n Psicosocial, 21, 103e110. http://dx.doi.org/10.5093/
versions of measurement tools: a practical perspective]. Psychosocial Intervention/Intervencio
in2012v21n1a7.
Balluerka, N., Gorostiaga, A., & Haranburu, M. (2012). Validation of Children's Depression Scale in the Basque-speaking population. The Spanish Journal of
Psychology, 15, 1400e1410. http://dx.doi.org/10.5209/rev_SJOP.2012.v15.n3.39424.
Balluerka, N., Vergara, A., & Arnau, J. (2009). Calculating the main alternatives to null-hypothesis-signicance testing in between-subject experimental
designs. Psicothema, 21, 141e151.
Beilock, S. L., & Ramirez, G. (2011). On the interplay between emotion and cognitive control: Implications for enhancing academic achievement. In J. Mestre,
& B. Ross (Eds.), The psychology of learning and motivation (pp. 137e169). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
Bowlby, J. (1969). Attachment and loss: Vol. 1. Attachment. New York, NY: Basic Books.
Bowlby, J. (1973). Separation: Vol. 2. Anxiety and anger. New York, NY: Basic Books.
Casey, B. J., Jones, J., & Somerville, L. (2011). Braking and accelerating of the adolescent brain. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 21, 21e33. http://dx.doi.org/
10.1111/j.1532-7795.2010.00712.x.
Cleveland, E. S., & Reese, E. (2005). Maternal structure and autonomy support in conversations about the past: Contributions to children's autobiographical
memory. Developmental Psychology, 41, 376e388. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.41.2.376.
Derdikman-Eiron, R., Indredavik, M. S., Bratberg, G. H., Taraldsen, G., Bakken, I. J., & Colton, M. (2011). Gender differences in subjective well-being, selfesteem and psychosocial functioning in adolescents symptoms of anxiety and depression: Findings from the Nord-Trndelag health study. Scandinavian
Journal of Psychology, 52, 261e267. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9450.2010.00859.x.
Diener, E., Oishi, S., & Ryan, K. L. (2013). Universal and cultural differences in the causes and structure of happiness: A multilevel review. In C. L. M. Keyes (Ed.
), Mental well-being: International contributions to the study of positive mental health (pp. 153e176). New York, NY: Springer.
Dolan, P., Peasgood, T., & White, M. (2008). Do we really know what makes us happy? A review of the economic literature on the factors associated with
subjective well-being. Journal of Economic Psychology, 29, 94e122. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.joep.2007.09.001.
Gallarin, M., & Alonso-Arbiol, I. (2012). Parenting practices, parental attachment, and aggressiveness in adolescence: A predictive model. Journal of
Adolescence, 35, 1601e1610. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.adolescence.2012.07.002.
Gallarin, M., & Alonso-Arbiol, I. (2013). Dimensionality of the inventory of parent and peer attachment (IPPA): Evaluation with the Spanish version. The
Spanish Journal of Psychology, 16(E55), 1e14. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/sjp.2013.47.
Gomez, R., & McLaren, S. (2007). The inter-relations of mother and father attachment, self-esteem and aggression during late adolescence. Aggressive
Behavior, 33, 160e169. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ab.20181.
Graham, S. (1991). A review of attribution theory in achievement contexts. Education Psychology Review, 3, 5e39. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF01323661.
Grotevant, H. D., & Cooper, C. R. (1985). Patterns of interaction in family relationships and the development of identity exploration in adolescence. Child
Development, 56, 415e428. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/1129730.
H
artel, C. E. J., Ashkanasy, N. M., & Zerbe, W. J. (2009). Emotions in groups, organizations, and cultures. Bingly, UK: Emerald Group/JAI.
Hazan, C., & Zeifman, D. (1994). Sex and the psychological tether. In D. Perlman, & K. Bartholomew (Eds.), Advances in personal relationships (pp. 151e180).
London: Jessica Kingsley.
Huebner, E. S., Drane, J. W., & Valois, R. F. (2000). Levels and demographic correlates of adolescent life satisfaction reports. School Psychology International, 21,
281e292. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0143034300213005.
Huebner, E. S., Suldo, S. M., Valois, R. F., & Drane, J. W. (2006). The Brief Multidimensional Students' Life Satisfaction Scale: Sex, race, and grade effects for
applications with middle school students. Applied Research in Quality of Life, 1, 211e216. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11482-006-9016-9.
Huppert, F. A., Baylis, N., & Keverne, B. (2004). Introduction: Why do we need a science of well-being? Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of
London: Biological Sciences, 359(1449), 1331e1332. http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2004.1519.
James, L. J., Demaree, R. G., & Wolf, G. (1993). RWG: An Assessment of within-group inter-rater agreement. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78, 306e309. http://
dx.doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.78.2.306.
Kerns, K. A., Tomich, P. L., & Kim, P. (2006). Normative trends in children's perception of availability and utilization of attachment gures in middle
childhood. Social Development, 15, 1e22. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9507.2006.00327.x.
Laible, D. (2007). Attachment with parents and peers in late adolescence: Links with emotional competence and social behavior. Personality and Individual
Differences, 43, 1185e1197. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2007.03.010.
Lang, M., & Tisher, M. (1978). Children's Depression Scale. Victoria, Australia: Australian Council for Educational Research.
Laurent, J., Catanzaro, S. J., Joiner, T. E., Rudolph, K. D., Potter, K. I., Lambert, S., , Gathright, et al. (1999). A measure of positive and negative affect for
children: Scale development and preliminary validation. Psychological Assessment, 11, 326e338. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/1040-3590.11.3.326.
Lerner, R., & Steinberg, L. (Eds.). (2004). Handbook of adolescent psychology (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Wiley.
Lovat, T., & Toomey, R. (2009). Values education and quality teaching: The double helix effect. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer.
Lovat, T., Toomey, V., & Clement, N. (2010). International research handbook on values education and student wellbeing. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer.
Martnez, I., & Garca, J. F. (2007). Impact of parenting styles on adolescents' self-esteem and internalization of values in Spain. The Spanish Journal of
Psychology, 10, 338e348. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S1138741600006600.
Moksnes, U. K., & Espnes, G. A. (2012). Self-esteem and emotional health in adolescents e Gender and age as potential moderators. Scandinavian Journal of
Psychology, 53, 483e489. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/sjop.12021.
Monroe, S. M., & Harkness, K. L. (2011). Recurrence in major depression: A conceptual analysis. Psychological Review, 118, 655e674. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/
a0025190.

venes vctimas de maltrato infantil en situacio

n de acogimiento residencial [Social
Muela, A., Balluerka, N., & Torres, B. (2013). Ajuste social y escolar de jo
and school adjustment in young victims of child abuse in residential care situation]. Anales de Psicologa, 29, 197e206.
Muela, A., Torres, B., & Balluerka, N. (2012). Estilo de apego y psicopatologa en adolescentes vctimas de maltrato infantil [Attachment style and psychopathology in adolescents victims of child abuse]. Infancia y Aprendizaje, 35, 451e469. http://dx.doi.org/10.1174/021037012803495294.
Nelis, S. M., & Rae, G. (2009). Brief report: Peer attachment in adolescents. Journal of Adolescence, 32, 443e447. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.adolescence.
202008.03.006.
Nickerson, A. B., & Nagle, R. J. (2004). The inuence of parent and peer attachments on life satisfaction in middle childhood and early adolescence. Social
Indicators Research, 66, 35e60. http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/B:SOCI.0000007496.42095.2c.
Nickerson, A. B., & Nagle, R. J. (2005). Parent and peer relations in middle childhood and early adolescence. Journal of Early Adolescence, 25, 223e249. http://
dx.doi.org/10.1177/0272431604274174.

mez, S., & Suarez Ortega, M. (2010). Gender differences in students' general and academic self-concept at the end of
Padilla-Carmona, M. T., Garca Go

n, 352, 495e515.
compulsory education. Revista de Educacio
Parker, J. G., & Asher, S. R. (1993). Friendship and friendship quality in middle childhood: Links with peer group acceptance and feelings of loneliness and
dissatisfaction. Developmental Psychology, 29, 611e621. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.29.4.611.

N. Balluerka et al. / Journal of Adolescence 53 (2016) 1e9

lisis diferencial por curso y ge

nero [SelfPastor, Y., Balaguer, I., & Garca-Merita, M. L. (2003). El autoconcepto y la autoestima en la adolescencia media: ana
concept and self-esteem in middle adolescence: Differential analysis by grade and gender]. Revista de Psicologa Social, 18, 141e159. http://dx.doi.org/10.
1174/021347403321645258.
Patrick, J., Turner, J. C., Meyer, D. K., & Midgley, C. (2003). How teachers establish psychological environments during the rst days of school: Associations
with avoidance in mathematics. Teachers College Record, 105, 1521e1558. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1467-9620.00299.
Pianta, R., La Paro, K. M., & Hamre, B. K. (2008). Classroom assessment scoring system manual: Ke3. Baltimore, MD: Brookes.
Pintrich, P. R. (2003). A motivational science perspective on the role of student motivation in learning and teaching contexts. Journal of Educational Psychology, 95, 667e686. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.95.4.667.
Raudenbush, S. W., & Bryk, A. S. (2002). Hierarchical linear Models: Applications and data analysis methods, second edition. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
Ronen, T., Hamama, L., Rosenbaum, M., & Mishely-Yarlap, A. (2014). Subjective well-being in adolescence: The role of self-control, social support, age,
gender, and familial crisis. Journal of Happiness Studies, 8, 1e24. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10902-014-9585-5.
Rosenblum, G. D., & Lewis, M. (2003). Emotional development in adolescence. In G. R. Adams, & M. Berzonsky (Eds.), Blackwell handbook of adolescence (pp.
269e289). Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishing.
Ryff, C. D. (1989). Happiness is everything, or is it? Explorations on the meaning of psychological well-being. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57,
1069e1081. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.57.6.1069.
Ryff, C. D., & Keyes, C. L. M. (1995). The structure of psychological well-being revisited. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69, 719e727. http://dx.doi.
org/10.1037/0022-3514.69.4.719.
Salami, S. O. (2011). Personality and psychological well-being of adolescents: The moderating role of emotional intelligence. Social Behavior and Personality,
39, 785e794. http://dx.doi.org/10.2224/sbp.2011.39.6.785.
Shaffer, D., & Kipp, K. (2007). Developmental psychology: Childhood and adolescence (7th ed.). Belmont, CA: Wadsword.
Steinberg, L. (2013). Does recent research on adolescent brain development inform the mature minor doctrine? Journal of Medicine and Philosophy, 38,
256e267. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jmp/jht017.
Thapa, A., Cohen, J., Guffey, S., & Higgins-D'Alessandro, A. (2013). A review of school climate research. Review of Educational Research, 83, 257e385. http://dx.
doi.org/10.3102/0034654313483907.

, G., de Matos, M. G., Camacho, I., Simoes, C., & Diniz, J. A. (2014). Friendship quality and classmates support: How to inuence the well-being of
Tome
adolescents. Higher Education of Social Science, 7, 149e160. http://dx.doi.org/10.3968/5656.
Watson, D., Clark, L. A., & Tellegen, A. (1988). Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: The PANAS scales. Journal of
Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 1063e1070. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.54.6.1063.
Witherspoon, D., Schotland, M., Way, N., & Hughes, D. (2009). Connecting the dots: How connectedness to multiple contexts inuences the psychological
and academic adjustment of urban youth. Applied Developmental Science, 13, 199e216. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10888690903288755.