Professional Documents
Culture Documents
PROJECTS DEPARTMENT
SPECIFICATION
TITLE
EQUIPMENT CRITICALITY RATING
DOCUMENT NUMBER
84501-9200-9P-005
REV
2
DATE
1 Mar 03
PAGE
2 of 23
DATE ISSUED
PREPARED
REVIEWED
APPROVED
COMMENTS
14 Aug 02
B.Burn
S.Malkin
A.McIntosh
1 Oct 02
B.Burn
R.Ford
A.McIntosh
1 Mar 03
B.Burn
R.Ford
A.McIntosh
Department Name
Change
DOCUMENT NUMBER
84501-9200-9P-005
REV
2
DATE
1 Mar 03
PAGE
3 of 23
TABLE OF CONTENTS
1.
INTRODUCTION.....................................................................................................4
2.
PURPOSE ..............................................................................................................4
3.
SCOPE ...................................................................................................................4
4.
DEFINITIONS .........................................................................................................5
5.
REFERENCES........................................................................................................5
6.
PROCESS ..............................................................................................................6
7.
8.
ATTACHMENTS.....................................................................................................9
A
1.
DOCUMENT NUMBER
84501-9200-9P-005
REV
2
DATE
1 Mar 03
PAGE
4 of 23
INTRODUCTION
Quality activities are driven by a formal criticality rating process, which considers:
a)
b)
PURPOSE
To describe a standard system for reviewing and defining the criticality of
procured items and for identifying a consistent and appropriate level of quality
surveillance during the manufacturing cycle.
This procedure is also intended to communicate the basis for establishing
inspection requirements.
3.
SCOPE
Covers design review, safety, environmental and quality aspects when
considering the criticality of procured equipment and complex fabricated items.
Criticality Rating Assessment shall be applied to those items considered critical
such as:
Linepipe
Induction Bends.
DOCUMENT NUMBER
84501-9200-9P-005
REV
2
DATE
1 Mar 03
PAGE
5 of 23
The Project Equipment List shall be used as the baseline for mutually agreeing
between Contractor and Company those equipment packages which require
assessment. A modified version is contained in Attachment F (Criticality Rating
Summary Sheet) which is based on the latest Project Equipment List.
4.
DEFINITIONS
Criticality: Characteristics of a product or service which present a measurable risk
of failure resulting in varying levels of significance with regard to cost, plant
operation, health, safety, loss of life and damage to the environment.
Criticality Rating: A comparative, numerical indication of the importance of a
product or service when assessed against specific criteria.
Criticality Elements: Standardized essential criteria which aid as guidance for
assessing the importance of such criteria The six (6) main criticality elements
used in this procedure are:
A.
B.
Facility Consequences
C.
Fluid Characteristics
D.
Design Factors
E.
Manufacturing/Supplier Experience
F.
Quality System
Each main element contains four (4) sub elements ranging from low to medium to
high levels of significance on a score of 1 to 4 where, for example, 2 is a higher
risk rating than 1.
Criticality Rating Code: A summary rating taken from the total score awarded
against all sub elements and which is selected as Low Criticality (L), Medium
Criticality (M) or High Criticality (H).
Review Team: The Review Team consists of a Contractor engineering
representative (e.g. Engineering Manager, Lead Engineer) and a Company
Engineering Representative.
5.
REFERENCES
84501-9200-1L-025
DOCUMENT NUMBER
84501-9200-9P-005
6.
PROCESS
6.1
REV
2
DATE
1 Mar 03
PAGE
6 of 23
DOCUMENT NUMBER
84501-9200-9P-005
REV
2
DATE
1 Mar 03
PAGE
7 of 23
6.1.12 The criticality rating code may be amended based on knowledge and experience
of the equipment being assessed. However, prior written approval shall be
obtained from the Contractor Pipeline/Wellhead Engineering Manager.
6.1.13 In the event that the criticality rating code is amended, the Criticality Rating Score
Sheet must record the justification for the change.
6.1.14 The Final Criticality Rating (CR) is determined by the final Criticality Rating Total
Score, in conjunction with any further amendment by the lead discipline engineer.
However, Final Criticality Ratings shall be mutually agreed between Contractor
and Company.
6.1.15 The lead discipline engineer shall sign off the Criticality Rating Score Sheet and
shall be responsible for logging the Final Criticality Rating on the Criticality
Rating Summary Sheet (Refer Attachment F).
6.1.16 Following bid analysis and purchase award to the successful vendor, the
assessment may be amended based on actual factors specific to the awarded
vendor, such as experience and knowledge of vendors systems, capabilities, etc.
to achieve a correct rating for the actual vendor. Any revision of rating shall be
noted on the Criticality Rating Score Sheet and the Criticality Rating Summary
Sheet.
6.2
6.2.1 When the lead discipline engineer has defined the Final Criticality Rating (CR)
then a Quality Program Requirements Sheet shall be prepared (Refer Attachment
B) for each procured item.
6.2.2 These requirements shall serve as the basis for review of all Inspection and Test
Plans and/or Quality Plans submitted by the Vendor. Inspection and Test Plans
and/or Quality Plans submitted by the Vendor will be made available for
Company review.
Comments may be annotated in the remarks column as guidance to inspection
events during the course of manufacture or fabrication.
6.2.3 The lead discipline engineer shall then prepare an Inspection and Testing
Requirements Sheet, form Contractor P501 (Refer Attachment D) and a
Manufacturers Data Attachment, form Contractor-INQ-4 (Attachment E)
6.2.4 All inspection requirements and manufacturing data shall be defined by using the
Quality Program Requirements sheet as the basis.
6.2.5 The Quality Program Requirements sheets, Inspection and Testing Requirements
and the Manufacturers Data Attachments shall be attached to the Material
Requisition and will form part of the Request for Quotation (RFQ).
DOCUMENT NUMBER
84501-9200-9P-005
REV
2
DATE
1 Mar 03
PAGE
8 of 23
6.2.6 During bid evaluation and clarification the Quality Program Requirements
Checklist (refer Attachment G) may be used as guidance and as a checklist to
ensure all relevant points are covered.
6.2.7 Note that alloy component of equipment and materials may require Positive
Material Identification (PIM). Guidance regarding the extent of parts to be
checked, sampling requirements, approved test methods, acceptance/rejection
criteria and marking requirements are contained in Positive Material Identification
Specification, Document No: 84501-9200-1L-025
6.2.8 It is extremely important that, when the criticality rating and the level of inspection
has been determined, candidate Vendors are advised at the earliest opportunity
(i.e. RFQ stage) of the intended quality program requirements.
6.3
Records
6.3.1.2
6.3.1.3
The points scored for each criterion, the summary of points scored and
the final rating, documented on the Criticality Rating summary sheet.
6.3.2 The Master Equipment List shall be used to summarise all criticality assessments
conducted by the Engineering Dept. (Refer Attachment F)
6.3.3 All criticality records shall be retained and maintained by the Engineering
Manager. Such records shall consist of:
6.3.4 All records shall be maintained in purchase order number sequence and shall be
made available for review by Contractor Quality Assurance if required.
7.
RECORD APPROVALS
7.1
All records shall, prior to issue for purchase be summarily checked by the Project
Quality Control Co-ordinator and approved by the Engineering Manager or their
nominated delegate(s).
DOCUMENT NUMBER
84501-9200-9P-005
REV
2
DATE
1 Mar 03
PAGE
9 of 23
8.
ATTACHMENTS
ATTACHMENT A
Item/Equipment No:
CR
CR
Index
Assigned
A. HEALTH, SAFETY, AND ENVIRONMENTAL. (Note : Due to potential consequences of health, safety and environmental failure this
element requires a minimum C. R. of 2
A catastrophic failure would lead to:
Criticality Elements
A.3 Medium risk, limited by emergency shutdown system, integrated safety systems in design
B. FACILITY CONSEQUENCES What impact would equipment failure have on plant/unit operation?
B.1 Equipment is of high complexity and failure would results in long term production shutdown due to mobilisation
time of repair equipment or fabrication time for replacement parts
B.2 Equipment is of medium to high complexity and failure would cause operational upset and/or production downtime
of more than 24 hours.
B.3 Equipment is of low to medium complexity and failure would result in moderate impact so as to inhibit full
production and require emergency maintenance and control operations.
B.4 Equipment is of low complexity and failure would only result in convenience to plant operation and result in
operational difficulties without loss of process operations.
C. FLUID CHARACTERISTICS What level of danger is posed by the medium transported?
4
3
2
1
C.1 Toxic Gases or liquids, highly corrosives transported in complex equipment with multiple gaskets / seals or bolted
connections.
C.2 Toxic Gases or liquids, highly corrosives transported in equipment with gasket / seals, or bolted connections
C.3 Toxic Gases or liquids, highly corrosives transported in equipment of medium complexity without gaskets / seals or
bolted connections
C.4 Innocuous gas or liquid transported in equipment of flanged, solid or welded construction.
D. DESIGN FACTORS Are there critical or new design features which warrant special engineering or inspection follow-up?
D.1 New innovative design with unproven reliability or non-code based requirements.
D.2 Extrapolation of proven design with limited reliability data or previous experience.
D.3 Modification of proven design with known reliability and past experience
D.4 Frequently used and well-proven design with easily obtained spare parts
E. MANUFACTURING/SUPPLIER EXPERIENCE What is the past experience in obtaining goods/services from the list of suppliers short
listed?
E.1 Past experience with manufacturers is poor, containing either design errors or consistent history of nonconforming
4
products.
E.2 No historical experience dealing with suppliers, or poor industry reputation of some possible suppliers
E.3 Manufacturers have supplied goods to company in the past with varied results
E.4 Manufacturers have provided goods/ services repeatedly of good quality during the past 5 years
F. QUALITY SYSTEM Manufacturers / suppliers quality system required for the equipment supplied
F.1 Manufacturer / Supplier may have to be accepted, which has quality system below industry standard.
F.2 Manufacturer / Supplier must have basic Quality System in line with industry standard.
F.3 Manufacturer / Supplier must have Quality System in accordance with industry standard (ISO 9000, API, etc)
F.4 Manufacturer / Supplier must have ISO 9000, Q1 or equivalent system certification in place
Point Score
18 24 Points
High Criticality
12 17 Points
Medium Criticality
6 11 Points
Low Criticality
Established Rating
Name:
Sign/Date:
Sign/Date:
Sign/Date:
10 OF 23
1)
ATTACHMENT B
QUALITY PROGRAM REQUIREMENTS SHEET
MRR No.: ..
CRITICALITY
Equipment. Name:
RATING
PO No.:
REQUIREMENTS
H
M
L COMMENTS
X
X
Assessment of suppliers by one of the X
following methods:
2)
3)
4)
5)
Design
documentation,
drawings
Procedures to be reviewed by engineering
or
6)
7)
8)
Monitoring
of
vendor
production/manufacturing.
during
9)
X
Dependent on critically of delivery
11 OF 23
ATTACHMENT C
2.
Check in NFPA Fire Protection Guide on Hazardous Materials for each hazard
classification. (Note: Usually no data is given if the chemical is innocuous).
a)
Toxicity (Health)
-
b)
Flammability
-
c)
Reactivity
-
12 OF 23
ATTACHMENT D
P501
PAGE 1 OF 1
TO BE COMPLETED BY CONTRACTOR
Rev. No.
Contractor's Name
INSPECTION AND TEST REQUIREMENTS
Item Description:
Req'n.
Fac.
05/08/02
R2216-014001
P.O. No.
Insp'n Type:
Date:
Final &
Fac.
Export Packer
Manufacturers Certificates
02
03
04
05
07
08
Compliance with P.O. Description, Specifications, Certified Drawings, Catalogue Description, Paint Specification
09
10
06
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
Notes:
13 OF 23
ATTACHMENT E
INQ-4
PAGE 1 OF 6
MANUFACTURER'S DATA ATTACHMENT
REQN. NO.
SELLER
MANUFACTURERS DATA FOR
:
:
:
R2216-014001
SAND REMOVAL SKID
INSTRUCTIONS
1.
DOCUMENT INDEX
THE LIST ON PAGES 2 & 3 OF INQ-4 IS AN INDICATIVE GENERALISED LIST ONLY. WHERE
REQUESTED SELLER SHALL SUBMIT A SPECIFIC DETAILED LIST OR INDEX OF ALL
DOCUMENTS/DRAWINGS UNDER THE TITLES SPECIFIED IN PAGES 2 & 3 WHICH ARE TO BE
TREATED AS HEADING OR CATEGORIES AS APPLICABLE TO THE ORDER ALONG WITH SCHEDULED
DATE OF ISSUE FOR EACH DATA/DOCUMENT ITEM ON THE LIST. AS A MINIMUM. A DETAILED LIST
OF THE KEY DOCUMENTS INDICATED BY (*) MARKED ON PAGES 2 AND 3 OF 6 (INQ-4) SHALL BE
SUBMITTED WITH PROPOSAL. SEE FORMAT ON PAGE 4.
WE DEEM IT NECESSARY TO EMPHASIZE THIS POINT AND GIVE IT DUE CONSIDERATION IN
AWARDING PURCHASE ORDER.
SELLER SHALL SUBMIT UPDATED INDEX ALONG WITH EVERY TRANSMITTAL.
2.
3.
G.A. DRAWINGS
DRAWING SHALL SHOW ALL DIMENSIONS WHICH MAY BE REQUIRED BY PURCHASER FOR INSTALLATION
AND FOR CLEARANCE TO ADJACENT EQUIPMENT WHEN INSTALLED.
4.
ACCURACY
SELLER SHALL ASSUME FULL RESPONSIBILITY FOR THE ACCURACY OF ALL DRAWINGS AND DATA
SUBMITTED BY HIM.
5.
DOCUMENT IDENTIFICATION
ALL MANUFACTURER'S DATA MUST BE IDENTIFIED WITH : " CONTRACTOR'S PURCHASE ORDER NO.,
REQUISITION NO., EQUIPMENT NO., (TAG NO.), PROJECT/CONTRACT NO. AND A CONTRACTOR DOCUMENT
NO. (CONTRACT NO.-REQUISITION NO.-ITEM CODE-SEQ.)
6.
DOCUMENT SIZE
DRAWING SHALL BE A1, A2, A3 OR A4 SIZE
OTHER DOCUMENTS SHALL BE ON A4 OR A3 SIZE PRINTS
ALL DRAWING PRINTS/DOCUMENTS ABOVE A3 (297 MM X 420 MM) SHOULD BE FOLDED.
AT "FOR APPROVAL" STAGE, VENDOR SHALL SUBMIT AT LEAST ONE REPRODUCIBLE OF ALL
DRAWINGS OR DOCUMENTS ABOVE A3 SIZE.
7.
8.
LANGUAGE
ALL DOCUMENTS SHALL BE LEGIBLE AND PRESENTED IN ENGLISH LANGUAGE.
9.
GENERAL
9.1
COST OF FULLY COMPLYING WITH ALL THE INSTRUCTIONS AND DATA REQUIREMENTS IN INQ-4 SHALL BE
INCLUDED IN SELLER'S QUOTE.
9.2
9.3
RESPONSIBLE CONTACT
SELLER SHALL FURNISH THE NAME, TITLE, AND TELEPHONE NO. OF THE PERSON WHO WILL BE
RESPONSIBLE FOR COMPLYING WITH OUR REQUIREMENTS AND TRANSMITTING SAME TO US.
TITLE:
TEL:
NAME :
9.4
NON-COMPLIANCE REPORT
PURCHASER SHALL COMPLETE AND ISSUE THIS REPORT (PAGE-5) TO SELLER, WHEN APPLICABLE ON
EACH TRANSMITTAL FROM SELLER TO MONITOR COMPLIANCE.
14 OF 23
ATTACHMENT E
INQ-4
PAGE 2 OF 6
TO BE COMPLETED BY CONTRACTOR
FURNISH
WITH
PROPOSAL
ITEM
CODE
MANUFACTURER S DATA
QTY.
QTY.
TIME
REQ
ARO
REFERENCE OF FINAL
CERTIFIED DWGS. &
MFR'S DATA (SEE
INSTRUCTION 7 OF PG 1)
QTY.
1.
2.
7P
6P
3.
5P
7P
6P
4.
5P
7P
6P
5.
7P
6P
6.
7.
7P
6P
8.
CONTROL SCHEMATICS
7P
6P
9.
WIRING DIAGRAMS
7P
6P
10.
7P
6P
11.
INSTRUMENT INDEX
7P
6P
12.
DATA SHEETS
7P
6P
13.
PERFORMANCE CURVES
7P
6P
14.
CALCULATIONS
7P
6P
15.
CODE REPORTS
7P
6P
16.
17.
18.
19.
20.
5P
TIME REQ.
AFTER APP'L
DWG MARK-UPS
6P
7P
6P
6P
5P
6P
6P
21.
6P
22.
6P
23.
24.
6P
25.
6P
26.
LUBRICATION SCHEDULE
7P
6P
27.
PAINTING PROCEDURES
7P
6P
28.
29.
7P
6P
30.
31.
7P
6P
32.
6P
33.
MANUFACTURERS CERTIFICATES
6P
34.
6P
7P
6P
6P
6P
15 OF 23
ATTACHMENT E
INQ-4
PAGE 3 OF 6
TO BE COMPLETED BY CONTRACTOR
ITEM
CODE
VENDOR'S EQUIPMENT
CERTIFICATE(S)
FURNISH
WITH
PROPOSAL
QTY.
35.
36.
QTY.
TIME
REQ
ARO
REFERENCE OR FINAL
CERTIFIED DWGS. &
MFR'S DATA (SEE
INSTRUCTION 7 OF PG 1)
QTY.
37.
PRESERVATIVE PROCEDURES
7P
6P
38.
LIFTING ARRANGEMENT
7P
6P
39.
LIFTING PROCEDURES
7P
6P
40.
5P
41.
QA/QC MANUAL
7P
6P
42.
QUALITY PLAN
7P
6P
43.
7P
6P
44.
INSPECTION SCHEDULE
7P
6P
45.
CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE
46.
CD ROM
47.
5P
48.
5P
49.
TIME REQ.
AFTER APP'L
DWG MARK-UPS
7P
2
7P
6P
6P
16 OF 23
ATTACHMENT E
INQ-4
PAGE 4 OF 6
TO BE COMPLETED BY VENDOR
TITLE / DESCRIPTION**
DOCUMENT NO.
VENDOR
CONTRACTOR***
REV
NO.
FINAL
**
THE ITEM NUMBERS AND CORRESPONDING HEADINGS/CATEGORIES LISTED IN THE FIRST 2 COLUMNS ON PAGES 2 AND 3 OF
INQ-4 SHALL BE USED WHERE APPLICABLE.
- VENDOR SHALL ADD DETAILED LIST BELOW THESE APPROPRIATE HEADINGS/CATEGORIES.
- VENDOR DOCUMENT SEQUENCE NUMBERING SYSTEM SHALL BE: FOR E.G. G.A. DRAWINGS-004-001, 004-002.
- THE SEQUENCE NO. OF AN ITEM NOT FALLING UNDER THE PREDEFINED HEADINGS OR CATEGORIES ON PAGES 2 AND 3
SHALL BE THE NEXT AFTER THE PREVAILING LAST ITEM.
***
CONTRACTOR DOC. NO. SYSTEM SHALL BE [CONTRACT NO.- REQUISITION NO. - ITEM CODE - SEQ]
E.G. R2391-4001-004-001 SHALL BE THE DRAWING NO. OF A MECHANICAL G.A. DRAWING.
17 OF 23
ATTACHMENT E
INQ-4
PAGE 5 OF 6
R2216-014001
CONTRACTOR NAME
VENDOR DATA SECTION
INQ-4: NON- COMPLIANCE REPORT
:
:
:
:
:
R2216-014001
SAND REMOVAL SKID
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
NO REPRODUCIBLES SUBMITTED
8.
9.
10.
11.
DOCUMENT BEARS THE SAME REVISION NUMBER AS THE PREVIOUS ONE SUBMITTED FOR
APPROVAL
12.
DOCUMENTS ILLEGIBLE
13.
14.
15.
16.
17.
NO TRANSMITTAL
18.
PLEASE RESUBMIT BY
DOCUMENTS REJECTED.
.
ATTACHMENT E
PAGE 6 OF 6
REQUEST NO.:
REQN. NO.:
EQPT TAG NO.:
DESCRIPTION:
*
SPECIFICATION DEVIATION/REQUEST
POST-APPROVAL REVISION
IMPACT
COST
DOCUMENT INDEX
DELIVERY OF MATERIAL
WEIGHT
SIGNATURE
SIGNATURE
DATE
:
DATE:
*
*
BACK CHARGEABLE
REVISION DEVIATION
ACCEPTED
DATE:
DATE:
DATE:
APPROVAL (Company):
DATE:
REJECTED
IMPORTANT
Specification issued with P.O. and KEY Vendor Data approval thereafter are treated as "FROZEN" BOTH BY
SELLER AND BUYER.
POST-ORDER DEVIATION OR POST-APPROVAL REVISION INITIATED BY VENDOR IS THEREAFTER
STRICTLY PROHIBITED.
Under no circumstances seller shall revise documents/drawings without receipt of prior approval on this form.
This form is intended to control post-order deviations and/or post-approval revisions.
*DISTRIBUTION:
REQUISITION ENGINEER
ORIGINAL TO VENDOR
INSPECTION
PROCUREMENT
FABRICATION
CRITICALITY RATING
SUMMARY SHEET
Item
System
Subsystem
Tag
Location
Attachment F
Page 1 of 1
Rating Point
Remarks
Final
A B C D E F Criticality
Criticality
Rating
Rating (CR)
Total
Score
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
21 OF 23
22 OF 23
ATTACHMENT G
MR/PO No.
1. Vendors Inspection and Test Plan and/or Quality Plan is required for review
with bid. (Typical plan would be acceptable.)
Y / N
Y / N
4. Design
documentation/procedures
identified
in
the
documentation scheduled are subject to review and approval.
Y / N
Contractor's
Y / N
Y / N
Y / N
Y / N
Y / N
Y / N
23 OF 23