You are on page 1of 2

pan-semio-en-theism - with nomereological stances, no root metaphors, no modal

necessities

mereological agnosticism (neither inconsistent with the fallacy of composition's


applicability nor its inapplicability to the universe vis a vis sufcient reason)
cosmogonal agnosticism (neither inconsistent with, for example, singularity, steady
state, quantum, string, cyclic or multiverse accounts, nor inconsistent with, for example,
creatio ex nihilo, creatio ex profundis, creatio ex chaosmos, creatio continuans or
cosmotheandric coeternality accounts vis a vis primal causation)
ontological agnosticism (not inconsistent, for example, with substance, process or
experience root metaphors)
modal agnosticism (not inconsistent with adequate determinism with or without
physical or metaphysical necessities)
kenotic agnosticism (not inconsistent with god-constraints, whether self, metaphysical
or essential, for example)
hence compatible with

pan-entheism - indwelling god with kenotic will (self constrained)


panen-theism - god as greater than sum of god's parts (metaphysically constrained)
pan-en-theism - cosmotheocentrism with kenotic nature (essentially constrained)

pan-semio-en-theism, mereological stances, root metaphors, modal necessity, fallacy of


composition, principle of sufcient reason, cosmogony, singularity, steady state,
quantum mechanics, string theory, cyclic universe, multiverse, creatio ex nihilo, creatio
ex profundis, creatio ex chaosmos, creatio continuans, cosmotheandric coeternality,
primal causation, substance ontology, process metaphysics, metaphysics of experience,
adequate determinism, physical necessity, metaphysical necessity, essential kenosis,
pan-entheism, panen-theism, pan-en-theism, cosmotheocentrism

You might also like