Professional Documents
Culture Documents
doi:10.1006/jnth.2001.2765
1:1
n0
1 X
X
n1
1n dqn :
djn;
4[d:
254
KEN ONO
Xi
i1
s
Y
i1
Xi2 Xj2 2
Xi2 Xj2 2
1:2
a1
as
A
s lX1 Xs :
1:3
la1 ;...;as
14i5j4s
As usual, let sn n :
dened by
a1
as
A
s lX1 Xs ;
la1 ;...;as
14i5j4s
Xi3
djn
1
X
k0
Bk tk =k! : t=et 1:
1:4
255
SUMS OF SQUARES
2k1 Bk
4n
sk1 nq
E k; z : 2
2k
n1
!
1
X
B
k
1:5
2k1
1n sk1 nqn ;
2k
n1
E k; z : 2
1
Bk X
sk1 nq2n
2k n1
1s 4s
Q
s! 2s1
j1 j!
Yz
1:6
A
s lE a1 1; z E as 1; z;
1:7
la1 ;...;as
4s2 4s
!
1
Bk X
n
sk1 nq :
2k n1
Theorem 1.
Yz4s
22s 3s
Q2s
s! j1 j!
A
s lE a1 1; z E as 1; z:
1:8
la1 ;...;as
Corollary 2.
by
(
s
t n
2
(
s
t n :
Bt1
2t 22t1 2t2
2t1
if n 0;
n
st n=4 2 1 st n otherwise;
Bt1
1 2t1 2t2
t1
if n 0;
st n=2 st n otherwise:
1sn 4s
Q
s! 2s1
j1 j!
la1 ;...;as
r4s2 4s; n
A
s l
1n 22s 3s
Q
s! 2s
j1 j!
X
la1 ;...;as
s
a1 m1 sas ms ;
m1 ms n;
mi 50:
A
s l
X
m1 ms n;
mi 50:
s
a1 m1 sas ms :
256
KEN ONO
2.
PROOFS
1
Bk X
sk1 nqn :
2k n1
2:1
1
Y
1 qn
2:2
n1
2:3
2:4
1s z2s
Yz4s :
22s
Proof. In view of (2.3) and (2.4), the proposition follows from the fact
that [2, p. 121]
p
Z1=z z=i Zz: ]
Proposition 2.2.
Since
0
1
1
0
and
1
2 1
Gk 1=z zk Gz;
2:5
SUMS OF SQUARES
z1
2z 1
Gk
2z 1k Gk z:
257
2:6
Claim (1) follows from (2.5), and claim (2) follows by replacing z by z 12
in (2.6). ]
If Imz > 0, then
24z
.
(1) G2 1=4z 4z2 G2 4z
pi
24z
(2) G2 4z1 12 2z2 G2 z 12
.
pi
Proposition 2.3.
Proof. Let S : 01 10 and T : 10 11 be the standard generators of
SL2 Z. Claim (1) follows from the fact that [2, p. 113]
G2 Sz G2 1=z z2 G2 z 6z=pi:
1 1
Since G2 Tz G2 z, (2.7) and
ST 2 S1 T 1 , implies
2
G2
z1
2z 1
2:7
1
2z 12 G2 z 122z 1=pi:
2:8
Tz4s
4ss1 s!
j1
X
j!
A
s lg a1 1; z g as 1; z: 2:9
la1 ;...;as
Yz4s
1s 4s
Q
z2s2 s! 2s1
j1 j!
A
s lg a1 1; 1=2z
la1 ;...;as
g as 1; 1=2z:
2:10
258
KEN ONO
g k; 1=2z Gk 1=4z Gk
2
4z 2
1
k
2k1
k1
z 2
Gk 4z 2 Gk z
zk E k; z:
2
In view of (2.10), this implies (1.7).
To prove (1.8), we begin
g k; z Gk z Gk 2z, then
Tz4ss1
s!
2s
Q2s
j1 j!
with
Zagiers
formula
A
s lg a1 1; z g as 1; z:
[6].
If
2:11
la1 ;...;as
2:12
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
The author thanks the Number Theory Foundation, the Alfred P. Sloan Foundation, the
David and Lucile Packard Foundation, and the National Science Foundation for their generous
support.
REFERENCES
1. E. Grosswald, Representations of Integers as Sums of Squares, Springer-Verlag, Berlin,
1984.
2. N. Koblitz, Introduction to Elliptic Curves and Modular Forms, Springer-Verlag, Berlin,
1984.
3. S. Milne, New innite families of exact sums of squares formulas, Jacobi elliptic functions
and Ramanujans tau function, Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. USA 93 (1996), 1500415008.
4. S. Milne, Innite families of exact sums of squares formulas, Jacobi elliptic functions,
continued fractions, and Schur functions, Ramanujan J. 6 (2002), 7149.
5. R. Rankin, Sums of squares and cusp forms, Amer. J. Math. 87 (1965), 857860.
6. D. Zagier, A proof of the KacWakimoto ane denominator formula for the strange series,
Math. Res. Lett. 7 (2000), 597604.