You are on page 1of 5

How are we going to do it?

We're going to do it by having the wealthy pay their fair share and close
the corporate loopholes.
-noi; nchiderea lacunelor corporative;
Finally, we tonight are on the stage together, Donald Trump and I. Donald, it's good to be with you.
We're going to have a debate where we are talking about the important issues facing our country. You
have to judge us, who can shoulder the immense, awesome responsibilities of the presidency, who can
put into action the plans that will make your life better. I hope that I will be able to earn your vote on
November 8th.
-

Suntem mpreun pe aceeai scen; Donald, e bine s fim mpreun- adresare direct, o not
de familiaritate; deleg rolul de decizie electoratului- accentuarea responsabilitii acestuia n
alegerea predintelui.

Mr. Trump, the same question to you. It's about putting money -- more money into the pockets of
American workers. You have up to two minutes.

TRUMP: Thank you, Lester. Our jobs are fleeing the country. They're going to Mexico. They're going
to many other countries. You look at what China is doing to our country in terms of making our
product. They're devaluing their currency, and there's nobody in our government to fight them. And
we have a very good fight. And we have a winning fight. Because they're using our country as a piggy
bank to rebuild China, and many other countries are doing the same thing.
America pierde locurile de munc n favoarea unor outsideri (Mexic, China); creeaz o imagine de
victim pentru America i nu exist nimeni suficient de curajos s lupte mpotriva celorlali (Pentru
c ei folosesc ara noastr ca o piggy bank pentru a reconstrui China i multe alte ri fac acela i
lucru)
So we're losing our good jobs, so many of them. When you look at what's happening in Mexico, a
friend of mine who builds plants said it's the eighth wonder of the world. They're building some of the
biggest plants anywhere in the world, some of the most sophisticated, some of the best plants. With
the United States, as he said, not so much.
Tehnica repetiiei care s accentueze afirmaiile sale (So Ford is leaving. You see that, their small car
division leaving. Thousands of jobs leaving Michigan, leaving Ohio. They're all leaving). E de acord
cu Hillary n ceea ce privete ngrijirea copiilor etc, sunt n dezacord cnd vine vorba de numere.
So Ford is leaving. You see that, their small car division leaving. Thousands of jobs leaving Michigan,
leaving Ohio. They're all leaving. And we can't allow it to happen anymore. As far as child care is
concerned and so many other things, I think Hillary and I agree on that. We probably disagree a little
bit as to numbers and amounts and what we're going to do, but perhaps we'll be talking about that
later.

But we have to stop our jobs from being stolen from us. We have to stop our companies from leaving
the United States and, with it, firing all of their people. All you have to do is take a look at Carrier air

conditioning in Indianapolis. They left -- fired 1,400 people. They're going to Mexico. So many
hundreds and hundreds of companies are doing this.
Trebuie s mpiedicm ca locurile de munc s ne mai fie furate- america e o victim de care alii
profit. Coreleaz plecarea companiilor cu concedierea personalului. Aduce n discuie argumente
numerice ( reducerea taxelor de la 35 la 15 % pentru companii i afacerile mici i mari). Comparaie
indirect a proiectului su cu msurile fostului preedinte american Ronald Reagan.
TRUMP: We cannot let it happen. Under my plan, I'll be reducing taxes tremendously, from 35
percent to 15 percent for companies, small and big businesses. That's going to be a job creator like we
haven't seen since Ronald Reagan. It's going to be a beautiful thing to watch.
Proiecteaz la nivel discursiv viitorul (Companies will come. They will build. They will expand. New
companies will start).
Companies will come. They will build. They will expand. New companies will start. And I look very,
very much forward to doing it. We have to renegotiate our trade deals, and we have to stop these
countries from stealing our companies and our jobs.
-

America vs celelalte ri (dumanul) care fur companiile i joburile americanilor.

HOLT: Secretary Clinton, would you like to respond?

CLINTON: Well, I think that trade is an important issue. Of course, we are 5 percent of the world's
population; we have to trade with the other 95 percent. And we need to have smart, fair trade deals.
Ei bine, eu cred c comerul este o problem important. Desigur, suntem 5 la sut din popula ia
lumii; trebuie s facem comer cu celelalte 95 de procente. i trebuie s avem oferte inteligente,
comer echitabil.
We also, though, need to have a tax system that rewards work and not just financial transactions. And
the kind of plan that Donald has put forth would be trickle-down economics all over again. In fact, it
would be the most extreme version, the biggest tax cuts for the top percent of the people in this
country than we've ever had.
Avem nevoie de un sistem de taxe care s recompenseze munca i nu doar tranzaciile financiare.
Planul de reform al lui Trump- trickle-down economics- termen politic populist folosit pentru a
caracteriza politicile economice care favorizeaz clasele bogate/ privilegiate.
I call it trumped-up trickle-down, because that's exactly what it would be. That is not how we grow
the economy.

We just have a different view about what's best for growing the economy, how we make investments
that will actually produce jobs and rising incomes.

I think we come at it from somewhat different perspectives. I understand that. You know, Donald was
very fortunate in his life, and that's all to his benefit. He started his business with $14 million,
borrowed from his father, and he really believes that the more you help wealthy people, the better off
we'll be and that everything will work out from there.

Au abordri diferite asupra a ceea ce e indicat pentru ca crete economia- se leag de istoricul
familiar; norocul lui Donald- i-a nceput afacerea cu bani mprumutai de la tatl su- l acuz c
favorizeaz oamenii din aceeai categorie social cu a sa (cu ct va ajuta mai mult pe oamenii
bogai, cu att va fi mai bine).
I don't buy that. I have a different experience. My father was a small-businessman. He worked really
hard. He printed drapery fabrics on long tables, where he pulled out those fabrics and he went down
with a silkscreen and dumped the paint in and took the squeegee and kept going.
Propune propria sa experien familial: tatl su- om de afaceri mrunt, care a muncit din greu pentru
bani. Ea dorete s ajute clasa mijlocie, s investeasc n oameni, n educaie, n viitor.
And so what I believe is the more we can do for the middle class, the more we can invest in you, your
education, your skills, your future, the better we will be off and the better we'll grow. That's the kind
of economy I want us to see again.
n replica sa pe teme economice, Clinton a afirmat c "nu a a vom cre te economia" i c programul
lui Trump este de fapt "cea mai exterm versiune": de reducerile de taxe ar urma s beneficieze cteva
procente dintre americani, cei mai bogai.
HOLT: Let me follow up with Mr. Trump, if you can. You've talked about creating 25 million jobs,
and you've promised to bring back millions of jobs for Americans. How are you going to bring back
the industries that have left this country for cheaper labor overseas? How, specifically, are you going
to tell American manufacturers that you have to come back?
Cum va aduce napoi companiile care au plecat, industriile care au prsit ara.
TRUMP: Well, for one thing -- and before we start on that -- my father gave me a very small loan in
1975, and I built it into a company that's worth many, many billions of dollars, with some of the
greatest assets in the world, and I say that only because that's the kind of thinking that our country
needs.
-

Se apr- tatl su i-a mprumutat puini bani,cel care i-a nmulit a fost el; dac a fost n stare
s creeze o companie care n prezent valoreaz miliarde de dolari, va face acelai lucru i cu
america.

Our country's in deep trouble. We don't know what we're doing when it comes to devaluations and all
of these countries all over the world, especially China. They're the best, the best ever at it. What
they're doing to us is a very, very sad thing.
In discursul su cu privire la planul de redresare a economiei americane, tactica victimizrii Americii
este pregnant- America e atacat din toate prile, e hituit i trebuie s se apere: We have to
renegotiate our trade deals. And, Lester, they're taking our jobs, they're giving incentives, they're
doing things that, frankly, we don't do.

Trump ncepe la rndul su s atace: dup ce, cu o politee ironic, se intereseaz de fericirea lui
Hillary (Is that OK? Good. I want you to be very happy. It's very important to me), o acuz pe
aceasta c e interesat de crearea locurilor de munc doar pe baza considerentelor electorale, c totul e
o strategie de imagine (But in all fairness to Secretary Clinton, when she started talking about this, it
was really very recently. She's been doing this for 30 years. And why hasn't she made the agreements
better?).
The NAFTA agreement is defective. Just because of the tax and many other reasons, but just because
of the fact..
Soluia propus de Trump este s opreasc companiile din a pleca prin intermediul taxe. Hillary
contra-atac cu un argument istoric, amintind de Marea Recensiune din urm cu opt ani, care s-a
datorat politicilor fiscale i insinueaz c Trump ar fi unul dintre cei care a provocat criza de locuine,
citndu-l prin tehnica discursului raportat Sper s fie colaps, pentru c atunci pot cumpra nite case
i s fac nite bani. Intervenia prompt a lui Trump Its called business, by the way vine n
dezavantajul acestuia, scoate la iveal sngele-rece al businessman-ului Trump care, n interesul
propriilor afaceri, admite c a contribuit la adncirea crizei care a lsat 9 milioane de americani fr
joburi i 5 milioane fr case.

Donald crede c schimbrile climatice reprezint o fars comise de chinezi. Eu cred c e real.
*Trump a spus schimbrile climatice este o fars comis de chinezi. Din 2012:
"Conceptul de nclzire global a fost creat de ctre i pentru chinezi, n scopul de a face procesul de
fabricaie al SUA non-competitiv."
Trump intervine i neag afirmaiile lui Clinton la adresa sa

I think it's real.

TRUMP: I did not. I did not. I do not say that.

CLINTON: I think science is real.

TRUMP: I do not say that.

Clinton propune noi soluii care vizeaz crearea de noi locuri de munc: s implementeze jumtate de
milion de panouri solare, energie regenerabil pentru a alimenta fiecare cas, o nou reea electric
modern- soluii noi (never going back to what got us in trouble in the first place).

Trump: panouri solare- scandalul Solyndra; crede n toate formele de energie, doar c gestionarea este
deficitar ( politicile energetice sunt un dezastru- acuz administraia Obama;
Laitmotivul plecrii firmelor din ar: And all you have to do is look at Michigan and look at Ohio and
look at all of these places where so many of their jobs and their companies are just leaving, they're
gone.
Atac direct la adresa lui Hillary- de ce nu a luat msuri mai din timp, de ce abia acum vine cu soluii,
avnd n vedere c activeaz n politic de 30 de ani? (And, Hillary, I'd just ask you this. You've been
doing this for 30 years. Why are you just thinking about these solutions right now? For 30 years,
you've been doing it, and now you're just starting to think of solutions.)
Nu i permite s rspund- o ntrebare retoric; folosee tehnica diferenierii ( eu voi aduce joburile
napoi. Tu nu poi aduce joburi napoi).
Clinton recurge la argumentul istoric- invoc politica soului su din anii 1990- vrea s reia tactici
care la vremea respectiv au funcionat (I think a lot about what worked and how we can make it work
again..)
Atac al lui Trump- soul lui Hillary a aprobat NAFTA, pe care l catalogheaz drept the single worst
trade deal ever approved in this country. Your husband signed NAFTA, which was one of the worst
things that ever happened to the manufacturing industry.- Acordul Nord-American de Comer Liber
Hilary se apr- recurge la realizri avute n cariera sa de secretar de stat- exporturile americane au
crescut cu 30%, chiar 50% n cazul Chinei. Aa vrea s creeze noi joburi
Trump menine argumentul temporal- nu a acionat n 30 de ani (TRUMP: But you haven't done it in
30 years or 26 years or any number you want to...

CLINTON: Well, I've been a senator, Donald...

TRUMP: You haven't done it. You haven't done it.).


NAFTA a cauzat devastri

Trump a acuzat China pentru devalorizarea dolarului american i pierderea unor locuri de munc n
SUA. Clinton a afirmat c Trump are sensul de "trump up" (a nela), cu referire la teoria economic a
efectului de cascad (trickle down), susinut de dreapta, potrivit creia bunstarea celor mai boga i se
transmite celor mai sraci prin crearea locurilor de munc, stimularea cererii i venituri mai mari
pentru salariai.

You might also like