Professional Documents
Culture Documents
www.elsevier.com/locate/jembe
Abstract
Due to the nature of coastal and estuarine systems, seagrasses must be able to tolerate short-term salinity fluctuations including
both hyposaline and hypersaline conditions. Salt tolerance can be achieved, in part, through vacuolar ion sequestering (mostly Na+,
K+, and Cl) and cytosolic osmolyte accumulation (K+ and organic osmolytes), with differences in cellular ion levels attributed to
selective ion flux and ion partitioning between the cytoplasm and vacuole (with lower cytoplasmic-to-vacuolar ratios favoring
higher cellular Na+ concentrations). The hydrophilic nature of organic compounds such as organic acids, soluble carbohydrates,
and free amino acids allow them to serve as osmoprotectants and low-molecular-weight chaperones which diminishes the
inhibitory effects of potentially harmful ions on metabolic processes. Nevertheless, some carbohydrate studies on seagrasses have
shown decreased soluble sugar content with increased salinities. During salt stress, carbohydrates are likely converted to other
organic compounds that would better facilitate osmotic adjustment in these plants. This is further supported by observed decreases
in sucrose-P synthase (a key enzyme involved in sucrose synthesis) activities in seagrass exposed to higher salinities. While
modifications in ion flux and organic solute levels often follow changes in environmental salinities, these adjustments are relatively
slow (hours to days). Therefore, the initial response to sudden salinity change will include rapid alterations in turgor pressure driven by
water flux in the direction of the osmotic gradient. The rate of water movement depends largely on the hydraulic conductivity of the
plasmalemma and the elastic properties of the cell wall (bulk elastic modulus; ). Observations on cell wall elasticity indicate that
some seagrasses maintain fairly rigid walls (high values), thereby limiting the amount of water influx during hypoosmotic stress.
Although high would be beneficial to open-water coastal plants living in relatively stable saline environments, in estuaries where
salinities fluctuate considerably over shorter intervals, high could promote flaccid cells with no turgor pressure during
hyperosmotic conditions. Hypo- and hyperosmotic conditions also inhibit photosynthesis in seagrasses. Decreases in photosynthesis
have been attributed to declines in chlorophyll content, changes in chloroplast ultrastructure, disruptions of electron flow through
photosystems, and inhibitions of key photosynthetic enzymes. The uptake of nutrients can also be strongly influenced by salinity.
High affinity Na+-dependent nutrient transport systems (for NO3 , H2PO4 , and HPO2
4 ) which benefit from the inwardly driving force
for Na+ have been observed in seagrasses. Nitrate reductase, the key enzyme involved in nitrate reduction/ assimilation, also has
elevated activities at higher salinities which would agree with Na+-dependent NO3 transport. While our basic understanding of how
seagrasses survive in saline environments is increasing, it still lags well behind marine algae and terrestrial halophytes. It is likely that
further investigations will reveal unique physiological adaptations that have not been observed in other plants.
2007 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
Keywords: bulk elastic modulus; carbon metabolism; ion transport; nutrients; osmolytes; osmotic adjustment; photosynthesis; respiration
B.W. Touchette / Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology 350 (2007) 194215
1. Introduction
Seagrasses are highly productive submersed marine
angiosperms that grow in shallow coastal and estuarine
waters, providing critical habitat for numerous finfish,
shellfish, waterfowl, and herbivorous mammals (Phillips
and Meez, 1988; Klumpp et al., 1989). Substantial
declines in seagrass habitat have been reported worldwide, mostly attributed to light reductions from algal
overgrowth, sediment loading, and sediment resuspension
(Harlin, 1993; Morris and Tomasko, 1993). Processes
including direct physiological responses to nutrient
enrichment (Touchette and Burkholder, 2000a) and
altered salinity regimes have also contributed to the
disappearance of seagrass meadows (Zieman et al., 1999;
Rudnick et al., 2005). Clearly, salinity is a major
environmental component that can influence the structure
and function of seagrass communities (Montague and
Ley, 1993). Studies conducted on these marine angiosperms suggest that most species have optimal growth
195
Table 1
Salinity preferences in seagrasses
Species
Productivity/plant size
Amphibolis antarctica
Amphibolis antarctica
Halophila johnsonii
Ruppia cirrhosa
Ruppia maritima
Thalassia testudinum
Thalassia testudinum
Thalassia testudinum
Zostera capensis
Zostera marina
Photosynthesis
Halophila engelmannii
Halophila johnsonii
Halophila ovalis
Ruppia maritime
Ruppia maritima
Thalassia testudinum
Thalassia testudinum
Zostera marina
Zostera marina
Zostera muelleri
Zostera nana
Other
Amphibolis antarctca
Ruppia cirrhosa
Ruppia maritima
Ruppia maritima
Thalassia testudinum
Zostera capensis
Determined by
Reference
42
42
30
0
20
30
20 to 40
40
15
22
35 to 64
35 to 65
0 to 60
0 to 75
0 to 60
15 to 40
0 to 70
0 to 60
0 to 75
22 and 32
Productivity
Leaf production
Leaf production
Total plant mass
Productivity
Productivity-field
Leaf area
Productivity
Total plant mass
Productivity
Walker (1985)
Walker and McComb (1990)
Torquemada et al. (2005)
Adams and Bate (1994)
Berns (2003)
Zieman (1975)
Kahn and Durako (2006)
Berns (2003)
Adams and Bate (1994)
Kamermans et al. (1999)
25
40
9 to 52
17 to 35
20
30 to 40
40
31
22
35
32
5 to 35
0 to 60
0 to 88
0 to 35
0 to 40
0 to 70
0 to 60
0 to 93
22 and 32
0 to 140
0 to 65
Photosynthetic rates
Photosynthetic efficiency
Fluorescence
Photosynthetic rates
Photosynthetic efficiency
Photosynthetic efficiency
Photosynthetic efficiency
O2 production; electrodes
Photosynthetic efficiency
O2 production; Winkler
Photosynthetic rates
35 to 42
10 to 20
0 to 15
0 to 10
20 to 40
30 to 40
35 to 65
0 to 30
0 to 30
0 to 70
0 to 70
10 to 50
Plant survival
Natural occurrence
Germination; N.C. ecotype
Germination
Plant survival
Natural occurrence
Data are sorted by evaluation technique (i.e., productivity or plant size, photosynthesis, and other) and include seagrass species, estimated salinity
preference (psu), range of salinities evaluated, technique used to determine preference, and reference.
196
B.W. Touchette / Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology 350 (2007) 194215
Salinity fluctuations can alter important plant biochemical and physiological processes, which in turn,
can influence plant metabolism, growth, development,
and reproduction (McMillan and Moseley, 1967; Zieman,
1975; Walker and McComb, 1990; Ramage and Schiel,
1998; Vermaat et al., 2000; Torquemada et al., 2005).
While our understanding of salt tolerance in terrestrial
halophytes and marine algae has progressed considerably over the last decade, our comprehension of
basic physiological mechanisms involving salt tolerance in seagrasses remains incomplete. Therefore
the purpose of this review is to synthesize what is
known about plant-salinity interactions in seagrasses
including ion transport and accumulation, osmotic adjustment, photosynthetic and respiratory responses,
nutrient acquisition, and carbon metabolism. Due to
a number of gaps in our basic understanding of salt
tolerance in seagrasses, I have also invoked key physiological principles from other marine macrophytes
(including marine algae) and terrestrial halophytes to
build upon existing knowledge of seagrass-salinity
interactions.
2. Plant-salinity relations
Arguably, one of the greatest obstacles for vascular
marine plants to overcome is high salinities. Seawater is
more than 3% salt, with molarities of major ions ranging
from 540 mM for Cl-, 460 mM for Na+, and 50 mM Mg+.
For most angiosperms, elevated environmental salinities
can promote both hyperionic and hyperosmotic stress,
with consequential decreases in growth and development
and increases in plant mortality (Mahajan and Tuteja,
2005). Elevated environmental salinities will generate
lower water potentials, making it increasingly difficult for
plants to acquire water and nutrients from the environment (Munns, 2002; Larcher, 2003; Touchette, 2006;
Fig. 1). While physiological responses to saline stress are
remarkably similar to drought stress as increased
environmental salts effectively pull water away from
plant tissues comparisons between salinity stress and
desiccation should be made with some caution. Both
increased salinity and desiccation will increase cellular
ion concentrations, however the ratios of different ions in
plant tissues will be dissimilar. That is, the proportion of
Fig. 1. Whole-plant water relations in seagrass during hypo- and hypersaline conditions. Illustrations show initial water flux for plants acclimated to
35 psu and undergoing hyposaline (10 psu) conditions (left panel), and plants acclimated 15 psu and undergoing hypersaline (40 psu) conditions
(right panel). Water flux, as indicated by arrows, moves from high to low water potentials (). Leaf, sheath, rhizome, and root osmotic potentials (o)
were estimated from Halodule wrightii (collected from a euryhaline estuary) using a vapor-pressure osmometer (see Fig. 2). Vapor-pressure
measurements were converted to MPa according to the empirical equation (MPa = (0.173 [0.0269 mmol Kg 1]) 0.10) described by Rumbaugh
(1991). The degree of water flux will depend greatly on the hydraulic conductivity of the cell membrane and the elastic properties of the cell wall.
B.W. Touchette / Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology 350 (2007) 194215
197
Fig. 2. Non-vascular and total osmolality in Halodule wrightii tissues acclimated for six weeks to three different environmental salinities (15, 25, and
35 psu using artificial seawater in greenhouse microcosms). Tissues evaluated include leaves (panel-A), sheath (panel-B), roots (panel-C), and
rhizome (panel-D). Horizontal bars crossing each salinity-pair represent the osmolality of the cultured seawater. Note that tissue osmolality is
maintained well above seawater conditions. Data are presented as means 1 SE (n = 5), with significant differences within each tissue class indicated
by letters (ANOVA). Osmolality measurements were determined using a Wescor Vapor Pressure Osmometer (model 5520; Logan, Utah) according to
Tyerman (1982) and Murphy et al. (2003).
198
Species
Seagrasses
Cymodocea nodosa
Halophila stipulacea
Halophila stipulacea
Posidonia australis
Posidonia oceanica
Posidonia oceanica
Ruppia maritima
Ruppia maritima
Thalassia testudinum
Thalassia testudinum
Zostera marina
Zostera marina
Zostera marina
Zostera marina
Zostera marina
Zostera marina
Mean 1 SE
Halophytes and Coastal Wetland Plants
Cococarpus erectus
Halocnemum strobilaceum
Halocnemum strobilaceum
Laguncularia racemosa
Rhizophora mangle
Rhizophora mangle
Rhabdadenia biflora
Na+(mg g 1)
K+(mg g 1)
Na+:K+
Tissue type
Salinity (psu)
Reference
20.6a
65.3a
61.2a
1.79.4b
34.3
54.8c
1030
1022
2740
4045
1.54.0
2.55.5
16.0
320 mmol dm 2
300 mmol dm 2
400 mmol dm 2
28.9 10.8
20.4
19.8
15.4
3.610.9
24.3
22.5
1024
1020
16.525.0
24.532.0
1.05.5
2.04.5
32.0
200 mmol dm 2
190 mmol dm 2
100 mmol dm 2
17.6 2.7
1.72
5.61
6.75
1.30
4.14
2.40
2.00
1.81
2.74
2.55
1.50
1.22
0.85
1.60
1.58
4.00
2.7 0.58
Whole plant
Aboveground
Belowground
Leaf
Leaf
Leaf
Leaf
Rhizome
Leaf
Rhizome
Aboveground
Belowground
Shoot and Root/Rhi.
Leaf
Shoot
Root
34 to 38 psu
34 to 38 psu
34 to 38 psu
13 to 57 psu
34 to 38 psu
Seawater
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
3 psu to seawater
3 psu to seawater
9 to 44 psu
Seawater
Seawater
Seawater
2.1d
23.0
155
10.8e
4.6D
8.7e
13.3d
2.7
24.6
1.57
5.6
7.8
13.3
39.1
1.32
3.27
167
1.11
0.58
1.63
167.8
Leaf
Seedlings
Seedlings
Leaf
Leaf
Leaf
Leaf
2.5 to 20 psuh
0.00 M NaCl
0.68 M NaCl
10 psui
2.5 to 20 psu
10 psui
2.5 to 20 psu
Vilarrubia (2000)
Pujol et al. (2001)
Pujol et al. (2001)
Medina et al. (1995)
Vilarrubia (2000)
Medina et al. (1995)
Vilarrubia (2000)
B.W. Touchette / Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology 350 (2007) 194215
Table 2
Sodium and potassium levels (mg g 1 dry weight, unless otherwise noted) observed in different plant groupings (seagrasses, halophytes and coastal wetland plants, marine algae, and terrestrial plants)
6.9e
230.0e
7.0e
46.0e
46.1 22.6
60.6
17.5
16.6
14.6
18.4 5.3
0.19
22.3
0.71
5.33
18.67 15.0
Leaf
Leaf
Root
Root
42.7f
54.7f
38.2f
36.3f
14.6
19.3
70.6f
39.5 7.3
31.8
43.2
115.8
35.0
70.2
112.2
86.9
70.7 13.4
2.28
2.15
0.56
1.77
0.35
0.29
1.38
1.25 0.32
Whole
Whole
Whole
Whole
Whole
Whole
Whole
0.50
0.32 g
0.15g
0.30
0.42f
1.40
0.40
0.15
0.45 0.14
2.25
24.3
24.0
1.55
4.24
1.95
1.91
0.41
7.57 3.63
0.38
0.02
0.01
0.32
0.17
1.22
0.35
0.62
0.38 0.14
Leaf
Shoots
Fruit
Leaf
Tubers
Leaf
Leaf
Leaf
plant
Plant
plant
plant
plant
plant
plant
Balnokin et
Balnokin et
Balnokin et
Balnokin et
Seawater
Seawater
Seawater
Seawater
Seawater
Seawater
Seawater
Ruprez (2002)
Ruprez (2002)
Ruprez (2002)
Ruprez (2002)
Zubia et al. (2003)
Zubia et al. (2003)
Ruprez (2002)
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
al. (2005)
al. (2005)
al. (2005)
al. (2005)
In some instances data had to be converted to mg g 1 from ag g 1 dry wt., bmol m 3, c% dry wt., dmmol g 1 dry wt., emmol Kg 1 dry wt., fmg 100 g 1 dry wt., and gppm. Soil salinity had to be
converted to psu from mmol Kg 1i, and salinity was highly variable with soil depth h. Data include ion concentrations (Na+ and K+), mean molar ratios (Na+ K+), type of tissue used during analysis
(Tissue type), salinity or salt conditions (psu, unless otherwise noted), and reference. Mean and standard errors (SE) are also provided for each grouping for general comparative purposes.
B.W. Touchette / Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology 350 (2007) 194215
Salicornia europaea
Salicornia europaea
Salicornia europaea
Salicornia europaea
Mean 1 SE
Marine Algae
Chondrus crispus
Fucus vesiculosus
Laminaria digitata
Porphyra tenera
Sargassum mangarevense
Turbinaria ornate
Undaria pinnatifida
Mean 1 SE
Terrestrial (higher plants)
Caccinia cordifolia
Capparis ovata
Capparis ovata
Ficus religiosa
Manihot esculenta
Moringa oleifera
Psidium guajava
Tamarindus indica
Mean 1 SE
199
200
B.W. Touchette / Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology 350 (2007) 194215
B.W. Touchette / Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology 350 (2007) 194215
201
Fig. 4. Ion transport processes used in plants to achieve osmotic homeostasis. The primary ions (Ca2+, Cl, H+, K+, and Na+) involved in osmotic
adjustment are presented along with transport proteins (antiporters [A], channels [C], and symporters [S]), sub-cellular pH levels (cytoplasmic and
vacuolar), and membrane electrochemical potentials typical for the plasmalema and tonoplast. Note ion levels in the cytoplasm must be carefully
controlled to prevent metabolic disruptions (adapted from Hasegawa et al., 2000 and Taiz and Zeiger 2006).
202
B.W. Touchette / Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology 350 (2007) 194215
B.W. Touchette / Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology 350 (2007) 194215
203
204
B.W. Touchette / Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology 350 (2007) 194215
(fructose and sucrose), sugar alcohols (glycerol, mannitol, and sorbitol), complex sugars (fructans, raffinose, and
trehalose), and charged organic metabolites (ectoine,
glycine betaine, and proline; Fig. 5). Different organic
osmolytes have been found to co-occur as plants undergo
osmotic adjustment, and these compounds may represent
as much as 75% of the change in tissue osmolality
(Brown and Hellebust, 1978).
While the production of organic osmolytes can require
substantial energy expenditures, the expense is offset by
their secondary role as compatible solutes. High
concentrations of ions (N 100 mM) inhibit the activity
of enzymes (Davison and Reed, 1985; Richter and Kirst,
1987), whereas high concentrations of compatible solutes
not only minimally inhibit enzyme activity but also help
stabilize macromolecules (Yancey et al., 1982; Kirst,
1989). The hydrophilic nature of most compatible solutes
Fig. 5. Common organic osmolytes involved in osmotic adjustment and/or osmotic protection in plants. These compounds have been observed to
accumulate in seagrasses and other halophytes during osmotic stress (adapted from Hasegawa et al., 2000).
B.W. Touchette / Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology 350 (2007) 194215
205
206
B.W. Touchette / Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology 350 (2007) 194215
(Fig. 7). Lower is particularly useful during hyperosmotic conditions by decreasing the likelihood of
plasmolysis during water efflux. In estuarine macroalgae,
osmotic adjustment is often achieved by changing cell
volume and osmolyte concentrations (Kirst, 1989). These
algae have thin cell walls that can expand or shrink as
necessary, thus allowing them to tolerate sudden changes
in salinity typical of estuarine systems. In shoal-grass,
H. wrightii, flexible cell walls may also contribute to
cellular water changes in response to salinity stress. That
is, cell volume (as indicated by a rapid change in plant
mass) can increase or decrease by as much as 20% when
salinity is abruptly changed by 15 psu (plants acclimated
to 25 psu and introduced to 10 or 40 psu; Fig. 8). Furthermore, pressure-volume analysis on H. wrightii collected from a euryhaline estuary also revealed a relatively
low s at 0.3 MPa (Touchette, unpublished data).
In contrast, plants with higher (more rigid cell
walls) must respond quickly to changes in salinity as
even small fluctuations in cell volume will result in
substantial changes in turgor pressure. During hypoosmotic stress, a higher will have minimal water influx
Fig. 7. Initial cell-water relations (prior to osmotic adjustment) to changing environmental osmotic conditions (hyperosmotic [upper two panels] and
hypoosmotic [lower two panels]) as influenced by cell wall rigidity (elastic modulus; ). Lower cells (left two panels) have greater wall flexibilities
that can maintain positive turgor pressure (within limits) during changing osmotic environments. Higher cells (right two panels) have rigid cell
walls that may cause plasmolysis during hyperosmotic environments, but maintain solute concentrations during hypoosmotic conditions.
B.W. Touchette / Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology 350 (2007) 194215
207
208
B.W. Touchette / Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology 350 (2007) 194215
B.W. Touchette / Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology 350 (2007) 194215
209
Table 3
Salinity and light responses on above-and belowground sucrose levels (Suc; mg g 1 FW), sucrose-P synthase activity in aboveground tissue (SPS; mg
g 1 FW min 1), and sucrose synthase activity in belowground tissues (SS; mg g 1 FW min 1) of Zostera marina
Treatment
Aboveground tissue
Light30 psu
35 psu
40 psu
Dark30 psu
35 psu
40 psu
Belowground tissue
Light30 psu
35 psu
40 psu
Dark30 psu
35 psu
40 psu
Suc. (day-1)
Suc. (day-7)
Suc. (day-14)
SS or SPS (day-1)
SS or SPS (day-7)
SS or SPS (day-14)
40.0 13.8
46.7 1.1
38.5 4.2
46.5 7.6
62.1 13.0
32.6 0.9
82.7 11.3
61.4 18.0
50.1 1.5
0.77 0.21S
0.52 0.08S
0.18 0.10S
0.81 0.19S
0.35 0.03S
0.29 0.05S
1.48 0.31SL
0.54 0.12S
0.21 0.15S
50.9 21.9
32.3 9.6
30.2 4.8
27.4 4.9
36.2 7.4
43.7 12.3
38.8 8.3
44.9 13.6
60.7 15.6
0.71 0.35S
0.42 0.20S
0.28 0.20S
0.79 0.28S
0.44 0.07S
0.27 0.12S
0.43 0.25
0.37 0.23
0.10 0.08
268 81.1
313 47.5
281 82.3
238 29.4
273 131
206 44.8
279 104
252 40.2
196 32.2
1.11 0.21
0.99 0.63
0.54 0.15
0.57 0.18
1.39 1.10
0.70 0.49
0.96 0.41
1.21 0.26
0.86 0.11
272 12.4
233 25.3
200 20.9
112 13.7L
132 16.5
186 15.8
133 10.4L
139 15.1L
160 2.7L
0.79 0.20
0.63 0.08
1.00 0.51
0.58 0.21
0.66 0.11
0.86 0.29
0.59 0.21
0.34 0.20L
0.61 0.39
Aquaria experiments were conducted on Z. marina over a two-week time course with three salinity levels (30, 35, and 40 psu). Plants were either
exposed to light (250 14 E m 2 s 1; 12L:12D cycle) or complete darkness during the 14 day period. Data are presented as means 1 SE. Significant
differences (GLM, ANOVA; n = 3) are indicated by L (light effects) and/or S (salinity effects).
210
B.W. Touchette / Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology 350 (2007) 194215
B.W. Touchette / Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology 350 (2007) 194215
Finally, the flexibility of cell walls can strongly influence how these plants respond to sudden changes in
salinity. Unfortunately studies on cell wall elasticities are
limited to a few species. Many plants can modify in
response to changing osmotic stress (e.g., Dainty et al.,
1974; Graves and Gutknecht, 1976; Touchette, 2006),
however only a few studies have been conducted on these
ecologically valuable marine angiosperms. The importance of in short-term osmotic adjustment in these
plants needs to be examined further.
Acknowledgements
Support for this synthesis of salinity-seagrasses
interactions, and research that strengthened these connections, was provided by Elon University Center for
Environmental Studies, Elon College of Arts and
Sciences, UNC Water Resources Research Institute, US
Geological Survey, North Carolina State University
Center for Applied Aquatic Ecology (CAAE), and
North Carolina Sate University Department of Plant
Biology. I am grateful to J. MacFall (Elon University) and
J.M. Burkholder (CAAE) for providing laboratory space
and equipment necessary to conduct research presented
here. A. Hamilton and E. Allen (N.C. State University),
and G. Turner (Elon University) provided research assistance for new data introduced in this paper. [SS]
References
Adams, J.B., Bate, G.C., 1994. The ecological implications of tolerance
to salinity by Ruppia cirrhosa (Petagna) Grande and Zostera
capensis Setchell. Bot. Mar. 37, 449456.
Albert, R., Popp, M., 1977. Chemical composition of halophytes from
the Neusiedler Lake region in Austria. Oecologia 27, 157170.
Amtmann, A., Sanders, D., 1999. Mechanism of Na+ uptake by plant
cells. Adv. Bot. Res. 29, 75112.
Arai, M., Pak, J.Y., Nomura, K., Nitta, T., 1991. Seawater-resistant, nonspherical protoplasts from seagrass leaves. Plant Physiol. 83,
551559.
Baek, M.H., Kim, J.H., Chung, B.Y., Kim, J.S., Lee, I.S., 2005.
Alleviation of salt stress by low dose gamma-irradiation in rice. Biol.
Plant. 49, 273276.
Balnokin, Y.V., Myasoedov, N.A., Shamsutdinov, Z.S., Shamsutdinov,
N.Z., 2005. Significance of Na+ and K+ for sustained hydration of
organ tissues in ecologically distinct halophytes of the family
Chenopodiaceae. Russ. J. Plant Physiol. 52, 779787.
Barbour, M.G., 1970. Is any angiosperm an obligate halophyte? Am.
Midl. Nat. 84, 105120.
Basra, A., Dhillon, R., Malik, C.P., 1989. Influence of seed pretreatments with plant growth regulators on metabolic alterations of
germinating maize embryos under stressing temperature regimes.
An. Bot. 64, 3741.
Berns, D.M., 2003. Physiological responses of Thalassia testudinum
and Ruppia maritima to experimental salinity levels. Master of
Science Thesis, University of South Florida.
211
212
B.W. Touchette / Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology 350 (2007) 194215
B.W. Touchette / Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology 350 (2007) 194215
Lazar, A.C., Dawes, C.J., 1991. A seasonal study of the seagrass Ruppia
maritima L. in Tampa Bay, Florida. Organic constituents and
tolerances to salinity and temperature. Bot. Mar. 34, 265269.
Ledent, G., Mateo, M.A., Warnau, M., Temara, A., Romero, J., Dubois,
P., 1995. Element losses following distilled water rinsing of leaves of
the seagrass Posidonia oceanica (L.) Delile. Aquat. Bot. 52,
229235.
Liphschitz, N., Waisel, Y., 1974. Existence of salt glands in various
genera of the gramineae. New Phytol. 73, 507513.
Lu, I.-F., Sung, M.-S., Lee, T.-M., 2006. Salinity stress and hydrogen
peroxide regulation of antioxidant defense system in Ulva fasciata.
Mar. Biol. 150, 115.
Lttge, U., Ratajczak, R., 1997. The physiology, biochemistry, and
molecular biology of the plant vacuolar ATPase. Adv. Bot. Res. 25,
253296.
Lyngby, J.E., Brix, H., 1983. Seasonal changes in the concentrations of
Ca, Fe, K, Mg, Mn and Na in eelgrass (Zostera marina L.) in the
Limfjord, Denmark. Aquat. Bot. 17, 107117.
Mahajan, S., Tuteja, N., 2005. Cold, salinity and drought stresses: an
overview. Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 444, 139158.
Malea, P., 1994. Seasonal variation and local distribution of metals in the
seagrass Halophila stipulacea(Forsk.) Aschers in the Antikyra Gulf,
Greece. Environ. Pollut. 85, 7785.
Malea, P., Haritonidis, S., 1995. Local distribution and seasonal
variation of Fe, Pb, Zn, Cu, Cd, Na, K, Ca and Mg concentrations
in the seagrass Cymodocea nodosa (Ucria) Aschers in the Antikyra
Gulf, Greece. P.S.Z.N.I. Mar. Ecol. 16, 4156.
Malea, P., Haritonidis, S., Kevrekidis, T., 1994. Seasonal and local
variations of metal concentrations in the seagrass Posidonia
oceanica (L.) Delile in the Antikyra Gulf, Greece. Sci. Total
Environ. 153, 225235.
McClure, P.R., Kochian, L.V., Spanswick, R.M., Shaff, J.E., 1990.
Evidence for cotransport of nitrate and protons in maize roots. I.
Effects of nitrate on the membrane potential. Plant Physiol. 93,
281289.
McConnaughey, B.H., 1978. Introduction to marine biology, 3rd ed.
C.V. Mosby Co., St. Louis, MO.
McMillan, C., Moseley, F.N., 1967. Salinity tolerances of five marine
spermatophytes of Redfish Bay, Texas. Ecolology 48, 503506.
Medina, E., Lugo, A.E., Novelo, A., 1995. Mineral content of
foliar tissues of mangrove species in Laguna de Sontecomapan
(Veracruz, Mexico) and its relation to salinity. Biotropica 27,
317323.
Meharg, A.A., Blatt, M.R., 1995. NO3 transport across the plasma
membrane of Arabidopsis thaliana root hairs: kinetic control by pH
and membrane voltage. J. Membr. Biol. 145, 4966.
Mistrik, I., Ullrich, C.I., 1996. Mechanism of anion uptake in plant roots:
quantitative evaluation of H+/NO3 and H+/H2PO4 stoichiometries.
Plant Physiol. Biochem. 34, 629636.
Mohanty, N., Yamamoto, H.Y., 1995. Mechanism of non-photochemical
chlorophyll fluorescence quenching. I. The role of de-epoxidised
xanthophylls and sequestered thylakoid membrane protons as
probed by dibucai. Aust. J. Plant Physiol. 22, 231238.
Montague, C.L., Ley, J.A., 1993. A possible effect of salinity fluctuation
on abundance of benthic vegetation and associated fauna in
northeastern Florida Bay. Estuaries 16, 703717.
Morris, L.J., Tomasko, D.A., 1993. Proceedings and conclusions of
workshops: submerged aquatic vegetation initiative and photosynthetically active radiation. St. Johns River Water Management
District Special Publication SJ93-SP13, Palatka, Florida, p. 128.
Munns, R., 2002. Comparative physiology of salt and water stress. Plant
Cell Environ. 25, 239250.
213
214
B.W. Touchette / Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology 350 (2007) 194215
B.W. Touchette / Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology 350 (2007) 194215
stress in wild soybean species Glycine cyrtoloba ACC547. Biol.
Plant. 50, 586590.
Ye, C.J., Zhao, K.F., 2003. Osmotically active compounds and their
localization in the marine halophyte eelgrass. Biol. Plant. 46,
137140.
Yeo, A.R., 1998. Molecular biology of salt tolerance in the context of
whole plant physiology. J. Exp. Bot. 49, 915929.
Zhao, Y., Aspinall, D., Paleg, L.G., 1992. Protection of membrane
integrity in Medicago sativa L. by glycine betaine against effects of
freezing. J. Plant Physiol. 140, 541542.
Zhien, R.G., Kim, E., Rea, P.A., 1997. The molecular and biochemical
basis of pyrophosphate-energized ion translocation at the vacuolar
membrane. Adv. Bot. Res. 27, 297337.
215