Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Airport Design
Author(s): P. W. LE BLOND
Source: Built Environment (1978-), Vol. 10, No. 3, Airport Planning and Design (1984), pp. 196210
Published by: Alexandrine Press
Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/23286215 .
Accessed: 06/11/2014 02:59
Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at .
http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp
.
JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of
content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms
of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact support@jstor.org.
Alexandrine Press is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to Built Environment
(1978-).
http://www.jstor.org
Airport
Design
P. W. LE BLOND
Introduction
are
Airports
with
International
large.
or
two
one,
more
airports
3 km
each
runways
to
the
urban
large
is
pressure
area
areas
of
therefore
where
serve,
they
land
are
often
on
scarce.
The
plan
airport
mean
usually
needed,
so
ensure
there
an
ideally
more
airport
is enough
is
space
and change.
So straightaway
there is a
conflict which has to be resolved.
Similar
conflicts
exist
in
in
this
other
of
aspects
more.
obstructions
the
by
distance
from
does
not
figure 1.
Then
I discuss
I set
article,
out
some
of
scape
take
the
up
most
space.
ancillary
an increasingly
design,
important
aspect of airport planning, and finally I go
outside the airport boundary
and discuss
surface
most
access
passengers
this way.
196
remembering
planning,
get
to
or
from
the
that
airport
STOL
Landing)
can
allowed
a runway
150
the
Actual
within
For
aircraft
operate
runway
but
150
and
the
so
metre
line
ends
of the
and
example,
land
Even
for
some
there
runway,
there
no
metres
is considerable.
are restrictions
development.
metres.
centreline
runway
the
and
indeed
and
or
on
operate
45 or 60 metres
are
beyond
layout
be
can
and
of 750
may
sterilized
airport
Off
runways
of 3000 metres
aircraft
lengths
Take
(Short
London-Los
example,
runways
Smaller
shorter
of
(for
need
Angeles)
747) on the
aircraft (Boeing
route
longest
widths
for expansion
space
project.
The largest
from
should
planner
type of
should
be
Taxiways
to
and
from
used
the
as
the
runways
for
routes
aircraft
the
and
restric
of
would
be
obstructions.
international
runway,
or
standards
else
aircraft
Current
require
BUILT ENVIRONMENT
U.K.
184
on
it
and
metres
VOL 10 NO 3
AIRPORT
DESIGN
Obstacle
two
ance
major
the
the taxiways,
are
similar
instrument
between
to
the
clear
aircraft
on
in figure 2, and
shown
standards
for
the
distance
150
Whilst
the
largest
were
airports
current
based
extensive
tions
accommodate
Stansted,
aircraft,
on
are
aircraft
and expensive
current
based
many
smaller
BUILT ENVIRONMENT
land.
standards
existing
required
to
of cleared
hectares
the
on
older
and
modifica
aircraft.
(From
runway.
CAP
168,
The
Licensing
of
Authority)
centreline
of two
wingtips
as
Aviation
distance
is related
taxiways
between
Civil
a taxiway
The
airport.
parallel
there
and
for an
surfaces
by the
a runway
between
at
limitation
published
For
to avoid later
up
hour
to
about
on
that
40
aircraft
runway
movements
in
instrument
25
some
movements
per
hour.
Figure
examples.
VOL 10 NO 3
197
AIRPORT
PLANNING
AND
DESIGN
I'////////////
*\
<
Min.
. >f
49 5 m
~Uj5m
85m
2.
Figure
ances.
clear
Taxiway
, Runway
//////
( \
)(
)(
^ rTsrnt'W
)(,
) (
/
M(
[/
Fast turn offs
Holding area
Capacity
)( )
- 40 movements
per hour
Runway
TV
Turning area
'Single
Capacity
Figure
3.
Runway
and
taxiway
time
no
completely
new
of
in
up
run
198
have
as
taxiway
- 25 movements
per hour
layouts.
One
for
parallel
greater importance
extends
beyond
the
of
runways.
On
VOL 10 NO 3
AIRPORT
which
determining
are
areas
overflown
of
the
index
of
DESIGN
by plotting
aircraft
noise
of
airports
are
the
most
features
obvious
is their flatness
standards
laid
gradients.
Around
Passenger
Terminals
and
down
as
some
about
indeed
to
cities
there
maximum
are
there
not
complex
The
landside
access
zone,
forecourts, access
mainly
comprising
roads and car parks, may occupy 40 per cent
and the terminal building itself may be only
10
the
of the
of area
cent
per
terminal
complex.
is a cul-de-sac
taxiway
and
is very
waiting
an
aircraft
in
and
manoeuvre
distances
long.
the
along
4b
Figure
at
out.
the
Also
piers
other
end
the
walking
become
can
the
shows
long,
whilst
same
to
very
number
of
the
but
amount
same
in
this
case
of concrete
the
outer
stands
as
figure
are
not
Figure
4.
Apron
layouts.
not
always
the
answer.
Tracked
transit
VOL 10 NO 3
199
AIRPORT
PLANNING
AND
DESIGN
Piers
T
Ji
Conveyo s
wc
1
wc
ft
1
-
o ? rooms
CD
14
l1^
Terminal building
lA-rH"
11+
b Satellites
Transit track
'Terminal building
Transit station
with satellites
from
the
how
shows
where
transit
Satellites
the walking
is
station
and
piers
distance
short.
Figure
satellites
At
5
compare.
facilities
a
However,
pier.
waste
of
outer
different
considerable
stands
when
the
com
are
chosen
sees
airport
particular
open
apron
where
all
aircraft
are
directly
whilst
with
the
aircraft.
the mobile
aprons layouts
a number of drawbacks,
operating
allow
200
costs
and
last-minute
the
fact
boarding.
at small
including
that
it does
high
not
have
planners
or airports
airports
domestic
cannot
traffic.
that
However,
the
layouts,
be
handle
they
can
centralized.
with regard
Finally,
role
of the
barrier should
to pier and
as
piers
an
apron
accoustic
not be discounted.
At Heath
row's new Terminal 4, nearby housing will
be shielded from some of the activities on
the main aircraft apron by the airside con
course area which extends along the front of
the building and in line either side of it.
The
next
landside
largest
access
user
terminal complex,
the
However,
satel
served
well
shops
solutions
the
of
edge
airports,
and
stands.
rectangular
to how
according
the
aircraft
with
Clearly
is
at
space
wedge-shaped
pared
there
other
Piers
5.
Figure
lites.
most
difficult
of
zone
in
space
is usually
the
and in some
area
to
plan.
the
passenger
respects
is
Passengers
VOL 10 NO 3
AIRPORT
Figure
nals.
6.
Drive
to the
gate
termi
hand luggage.
If the forecourt,
railway station, bus station and car park are
all to be close to the terminal and road
carrying
crossings are to
level solution is
and
expensive,
to
having
change
be avoided,
then a multi
needed.
But this can be
result in passengers
level. Using stairs, lifts or
escalators may be less easy than walking a
little extra distance
on the flat. For the
BUILT ENVIRONMENT
DESIGN
will
new
proposed
terminal
at
where
Stansted,
down
on
forecourt
out
immediately
access
landside
VOL 10 NO 3
zone
may
also
con
201
AIRPORT
PLANNING
Terminal
AND
DESIGN
Forecourt
building
Figure
7.
landside
Proposed
access
arrangements
building
202
there
is
horizontal
segregation
for Stansted
Bus
Rail
Stn.
new
Stu
terminal.
between
that
upwards
passengers
to
board
have
to
the
aircraft.
level
change
These
con
VOL 10 NO 3
AIRPORT
DESIGN
a Single level
Apron
Deps
a a
Forecourt
Baggage
below
Arrs
mm
Forecourt
c
Two
level
Apron
Deps above
U
Arrs.
<
below
>
w
ffl
Forecourt
<
Forecourt
BUILT ENVIRONMENT
w
>
Figure
8.
Passenger
terminal
VOL 10 NO 3
w
buildings.
203
AIRPORT
PLANNING
is
level
mezzanine
to
introduced
ties
such
as
restaurants
shops,
and
offices
possible
construct
the
without
undercroft
will
Passengers
be
as
basement
too
much
able
to
an
excavation.
from
transfer
focus
airport
and
be
may
in
an
of having
prestige
form
an
allowed
some
to
the
cases,
attractive
building
overrule
the
need
consists
adapt
few
internal
seen
usually
But
columns
a roof,
walls,
as
used
being
an
such
of four
and
possible
for
environment
and
is
warehouses.
is
not
their
attractiveness
I have grouped
together
that is not in the runway and
and
taxiway
ancillary.
204
originally
this article
everything
ance,
have
Facilities
Ancillary
For
it may
cargo,
terminal
passenger
Thus it includes
car
parks,
zones
as
aircraft mainten
motor
transport
aircraft
aviation
offices, general
catering
depots,
facilities, hotels, fuel farms and
engineering services.
facilities are usually
Aircraft maintenance
constructed by airlines based at the airport
and the amount of land used for this pur
on the size of the
pose therefore depends
airline which uses the airport as its base and
is not necessarily in direct relation to the
Aircraft hangars may
airports throughput.
be the largest buildings on an airport, with
Boeing 747 hangars up to 35 metres high
requiring an area of up to 10,000 square
metres
for
have
and
each
aircraft.
roof
large
need
Hangars
to
spans
to
aircraft
cover
and
out
turns
to
be
the
simple
large
the
outset
the
thus
The
aircraft
the
of heating
the
of
to
the
in
testing
considerable
positioning
attenuation
The cargo
quickly and
of the
maneouvre
However,
areas
maintenance
source
other
and
hangars.
of noise
area
interior.
area is primarily
to
requirement
out
enclosed
the
hangars
in a maintenance
in and
engine
to reduce
cost
layout
related
'user
that
remember
however,
DESIGN
buildings
AND
and
the
is
careful
carried
cargo
terminal
passenger
somewhat
terminal
which
similar
facilitated
BUILT ENVIRONMENT
to
the
VOL 10 NO 3
AIRPORT
DESIGN
Plan
Elevation
Conventional
Tail Dock
Stepped Roof
Figure
Aircraft
9.
hanger
shapes.
transfer
of the
transportation.
scheduled
cargo
from
aircraft
the
general
Now
service
has
declined
to ground
all-cargo
with most
to the large
general cargo being consigned
holds
of
wide-bodied
aircraft.
capacity
deal
with
outsize
loads,
Specialist operators
etc.
The
fresh produce,
livestock,
parcels,
role of cargo agents in consolidating
loads
and
extended
Customs
obtaining
and
the
need
clearance
to integrate
has
air
cargo
scope
to waste
space
for
future
be
some
reserved
it waiting
by having
for
in order
However,
unknown
the
need,
expansion
empty
space
of a
not
can
number
are
usually
a number
remote
from
of reasons.
To
the
make
terminal
it worth
have to be lower
than
parks,
means
the
short
term
VOL 10 NO 3
car
and
only ground
this
level.
205
AIRPORT
PLANNING
AND
DESIGN
Aircraft stands
Equipment/load
consolidation area
Airline
Transit shed
Agents
building
Customs/Admin
10.
Figure
are
have
car
park.
cargo
if they
to walk
A
area.
available
rarely
even
and,
would
the
Layout
areas
Large
terminal
of
close
were,
to
passengers
long distances
means
of
the
across
transporting
par
future)
once
the
are
parkers
on
the
remotely
car
Long-term
can
parks
design.
trees
attractive
more
It needs
careful
on
to cars
be difficult to remove.
aisles,
long-term
landscape
to be careful because
substances
drop
by
car
As
parks
well
have
some
which
have
are
large
number
of
other
ancil
general
accommodation
because
problem
areas
where
slow
moving
large
are
airports
the
natural
streams.
in
is
drainage
Heavy
areas
impermeable
often
rainfall
of concrete
flat
into
on
to
results
ponds
it into
which
the
store
streams
the
at
water
and
controlled
then
rate.
can
as access
to
such
accommodation.
as
Landscape
Design
design
requires
large
areas
of
and
then using
land
up to the
BUILT ENVIRONMENT
VOL 10 NO 3
AIRPORT
11.
Figure
car
Long-term
on
parks
sites:
sloping
Perhaps
second
most
prin
important
areas.
number
of
At
there
Stansted
and
woods
it
is
are
and
course,
species.
The proposed
sted includes
features.
The
the
rows
of
must,
planting
landscape
design for Stan
a number
of interesting
car
long-term
park
is
on
gently sloping
out
New
ponds.
be consistent
of spaces
along
the
to lay
contours
so
(and,
the
to
an
passenger
BUILT ENVIRONMENT
extent,
acoustic)
terminal
and
landscaping
design.
an
village,
earthmound
is to be
constructed.
mounds
have
been
built
shaped
this
elsewhere,
around
planting
base
to
the
(see
to
proposed
DESIGN
screen
a small
Surface
Access
Lastly,
few
words
about
an
aspect
of
mention
to
them.
are
only
part
over-emphasized
to
other
potential
areas.
of the
system
and
to the detriment
Even
at
airports
VOL 10 NO 3
can
be
of links
where
the
to justify a
207
AIRPORT
Figure
12.
Stansted:
proposed
PLANNING
passengers,
but
taxis,
208
DESIGN
earthmound.
AND
buses
modes.
and
coaches
At the Lon
VOL 10 NO 3
AIRPORT
link
Underground
most
Heathrow,
travelled
introduced
users
airport
for
reason
modal
seems
modes
alternative
into
to
be
that
the
on the quality
on
than
the
as
buses
or coaches,
be appropriate.
previously
coach.
by
this
had
the
of
the
to
The
was
of the
DESIGN
provided
are
national
rail
very
then
a link
such
of the
part
local
networks
metro
which
jour
use
then
him
drive
a relative
or get
car,
to the
because
airport,
is available
or friend
such
to
a car
Passenger
important
roads
of
course,
hours
to
leading
is,
airports,
portion
of vehicles
widespread
and
will
far
most
on
larger
the
pro
occupied
by
origins will be very
Employees'
employees.
different from air passengers,
being more
on
the
access
system
a particular
be a good
used
But
the
by
the
dence
only
east
As
cars,
private
be
that
after
must
appropriate
there
must
public
also
road
buses
be
well
system.
and
taxis.
connected
to
with
Only
the
so
connected
the
as
around
picked
the
north
there
to
must
connections
to
the
local
particularly
to
the
urban
the
also
road
areas
and
good
network,
where
employees live.
which
The question
mainly
occupies
whether
or not a rail link should
is
planners
This question probably occu
be provided.
link
compared
and
stations
only
that
allows
fast
seem
to the city
a few
save
link
thus
would
passengers
may
with
frequent
minutes
at
stops
more
with
interchange
airport
also
may
be
for a comprehensive
In
interchange.
the
convenient
transportation
past,
have
planners
origins and
undertaking
surface
an
even
journeys,
principle.
in
and
the
with
of airports
though
is an
future
to
becoming
rail,
long-distance
we
the
locations
road
strategic
interchange
and
coach
see
may
out-of-town
connections
good
network
as
airport
old-established
for
points
bus
travel.
If
facilities
be
must
clearly
to
designed
cope
strategic
be
a fast
then of
and
up
completed.
connections
networks,
coinci
has
traffic
M25
was
it is no
and
Stansted's
non-stop
to air
exclusive
more
of London
well
sort of
national
airports
what
most
Clearly,
airport.
road
completion
is
type?
link
an
So,
surface
road
concentrated
centre.
city
for
less
what
location
be
usually
expensive.
own
or even
are
would
Conclusion
could
have
been
the
subject
Airports
planned
tend
years
to have
and
at least
built
in
more
learned
the
lesson
of providing
sufficient space
for
but
the
been
both
has
price
expansion,
high
in
terms
of
land
used
VOL 10 NO 3
and
construction
209
PLANNING
AIRPORT
costs.
are
Airports
because
of their
are places
so
enced
them
sonal
impession.
focus
and
travellers
can
of
the
fact
DESIGN
attention
that
they
designed
and
public,
scale
AND
who
an
have
have
experi
immediate
even
However,
per
if
you
or
baggage
words
who
will
about
has
have
that
waited
many
an
hour
for
his
complimentary
design.
NOTE
The
views
the author,
the BAA.
210
in this article
are those
expressed
and do not necessarily
reflect those
of
of
BUILT ENVIRONMENT
VOL 10 NO 3