You are on page 1of 4

Discuss the difference between the contribution of Tylor and fayol.

Which on
will you apply in your enterprice
Taylor and Fayol Theory of Management (Similarities and Dissimilarities)
Taylor and Henry Fayol contributed to the science of management. There are
points of similarity and dissimilarity in the works of both of these pioneers. Urwick
has summed up the contributions of the two as: The work of Taylor and Fayol
was, of course, essentially complementary. They both realised that, the problem of
personnel and its management at all levels is the key to industrial success.
Both applied scientific method to this problem. That Taylor worked primarily on
the operative level, from the bottom of the industrial hierarchy upwards, while
Fayol concentrated on the Managing Director and worked downwards, was merely
a reflection of their very different careers. We can, thus, sum up the points of
similarity and dissimilarity between the two as follows:
Similarity:
1. Both of them felt the universality of management.
2. Both applied scientific methods to the problems of management.
3. Both observed the importance of personnel and its management at all levels.
4. Both wanted to improve the management practices.
5. Both of them developed their ideas through practical experience.
6. Both of them explained their ideas through their books.
7. Both of them stressed mutual co-operation between employers and employees.
Dissimilarity:
1. Taylor laid his attention on the problems of shop floor while Fayol concentrated
on the functions of managers at top level.

2. Taylor worked from the bottom of the industrial hierarchy upwards, while Fayol
focussed on the chief executive and worked downwards.
3. The main aim of Taylor was to enhance productivity of labour and eliminate
wastages. Fayol tried to develop a universal theory of management.
4. Taylor called his philosophy of work as Scientific Management whereas Fayol
expressed his work as General Theory of Administration.
5. Taylor is known as father of Scientific Management and Fayol as the father of
Principles of Management.
6. Taylors philosophy has undergone a big change under the influences of modern
developments, but Fayols principles of management have stood the test of time
arid are well accepted even in the present days.
7. Fayol looks to the management in the wider perspective as compared to Tayior.
Main points for difference between Taylor and Fayol

For my enterprise I will select the fayols theory of management.


Fayol made outstanding contribution to management thought. He clearly specified
the functions of management by a systematic analysis of management process.
In the same way, Taylor introduced improved management methods by
emphasizing the concept of work measurement. Both the economist, Fayol and
Taylor, are best suited on their part and worked efficiently providing us with
appropriate way to learn and explore.
There is, however, no contradiction between the work of Taylor and Fayol. They
both applied scientific methods to the problems of management. Their work was
essentially complementary. Different in their approach was merely reflection of
their different careers.

Reason to select the fayols theory of management


Fayol argued that principles existed which all organisations -in order to operate and
be administered efficiently -could implement. This type of assertion typifies a "one
best way" approach to management thinking. Fayol's five functions are still
relevant to discussion today about management roles and action.
1. to forecast and plan purveyance examine the future and draw up plans of
action.
2. To organize build up the structure, material and human of the undertaking.
3. To command maintain activity among the personnel.
4. To bind together, unify and harmonise activity and effort.
5. To see that everything occurs in conformity with policy and practice

You might also like