Professional Documents
Culture Documents
A Hadaadi
Therefore, without further ado these are the different statements of Imaam Al Wadiee
regarding the Athaan of the Khaleefah Ar Raashid Uthmaan Ibn Affaan.
1
2
http://aloloom.net/vb/showthread.php?t=864
Ibid
become clear after Uthmaan and yet (the person) blind follows Uthmaan upon this
then he is an innovator because Taqleed in itself is an innovation. 3
From these verdicts the following benefits can be taken:
1. That the narrations of Ibn Umar regarding the first Adhaan were seen as
authentic by Ash Shaikh Muqbil Ibn Haadi.
2. That following the Caliphs means to follow them in that which went in
accordance to the Quran and the Sunnah.
3. That the companions are not free from error. Regarding their Ijtihaad some of it
is correct and some of it is incorrect.
4. To state that a companion erred regarding a matter does not mean that one has
spoken ill of him/her.
5. If someone falls into innovation/sin/Kufr mistakenly it does not necessitate that
such a person is an innovator, sinner or Kaafir.
6. Taqleed (blind-following) is unlawful and those who do such willingly, taking
this as their methodology in Islaam is an innovator.
7. That Shaikh Yahya Al Haajoori is upon the same methodology of Shaikh Muqbil
Ibn Haadi Al Waadiee.
http://www.ajurry.com/vb/showthread.php?20632-((-%D8%AD%D9%83%D9%85%D8%A7%D9%84%D8%A3%D8%B0%D8%A7%D9%86-%D8%A7%D9%84%D8%AB%D8%A7%D9%86%D9%8A%D9%8A%D9%88%D9%85-%D8%A7%D9%84%D8%AC%D9%85%D8%B9%D8%A9
And it is authentic. And the issue of Hishaam Ibn Gaaz, who was one of the narrators in the chain regarding the
statement of Ibn Umar, is a clear issue to the point that many scholars including Shaikh Abdul Muhsin Al Abbad,
Shaikh Muhammad Aadam Al Ithiopi and Shaikh Naasir Ud Deen Al Albaani have mentioned that he is trustworthy
(regarding Hadeeth).