U.S.

Department of Justice
Executive Office for Immigration Review
Board ofImmigration Appeals
Office of the Clerk
5/07 leesb11rg Pike, Suite 2000
Falls Church, Virginia 2204/

DHS LIT.Nork Co. Prison/VCR

3400 Concord Road
York, PA 17402

Name: PEREZ LOPEZ, FELIPE

A 208-055-200
Date of this notice: 11/8/2016

Enclosed is a copy of the Board's decision and order in the above-referenced case.
Sincerely,

boYUtL Ct1AAJ
Donna Carr
Chief Clerk
Enclosure
Panel Members:
Grant, Edward R.

Usertea m: Docket

For more unpublished BIA decisions, visit

www.irac.net/unpublished/index
Cite as: Felipe Perez Lopez, A208 055 200 (BIA Nov. 8, 2016)

Immigrant & Refugee Appellate Center, LLC | www.irac.net

Mella, Tahir
Law Offices of Tahir Mella, P.C.
1814 Callowhill Street, 1st Floor
Philadephia, PA 19130

. TJ.S. Department of Justice

E:eecutive Office for ftnmigration Review

Decision of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Falls Church, Virginia 2204 I

File: A208 055 200 - York, PA

Date:

In re: FELIPE PEREZ LOPEZ

NOV - 8 2016

APPEAL
ON BEHALF OF RESPONDENT: Tahir Mella, Esquire
APPLICATION: Reopening
ORDER:
The respondent appeals from an Immigration Judge's November 2, 2015, decision denying
his motion to reopen. The record will be remanded to the Immigration Judge. The respondent's
motion raises several new issues, based on new developments occurring since the Immigration
Judge's decision dated June 29, 2015. However, the Immigration Judge did not prepare a
separate oral or written decision setting out the reasons for the order dismissing the respondent's
motion. See Matter ofA-P-, 22 l&N Dec. 468 (BIA 1999). Further, there is no indication that
the Immigration Judge considered the possibility of exercising the authority to reopen these
proceedings sua sponte. See Matter of J-J-, 21 I&N Dec. 976, 984 (BIA 1997). In view of the
facts and circumstances presented here, we will remand the case for further proceedings and the
preparation of a new decision. Accordingly, the following order will be entered.
ORDER: The record is remanded to the Immigration Judge for further proceedings
consistent with this opinion.

Cite as: Felipe Perez Lopez, A208 055 200 (BIA Nov. 8, 2016)

Immigrant & Refugee Appellate Center, LLC | www.irac.net

IN REMOVAL PROCEEDINGS

..

In Removal Proceedings

PEREZ-LOPEZ, Felipe
Respondent

File No: A208-055-200

ORDER OF THE IMMIGRATION JUDGE

Upon consideration of the Resp

o
enfsMotion
to Reopen,

GRANTED c

motion be

Cl DHS does not oppose the motion.

DENIED because:

___ -------

. HEREBY ORDERED that the

.........

Cl The respondent does not oppose the motion.

CJ A response to the motion has not been filed with the court.
Cl Good cause has been established for the motion.

' The court agrees with the reasons stated in the opposition to the motion.
Cl The motion is untimely per----- ........
Cl Other:

Deadlines:

Cl The application(s) for relief must be filed by __________---=-

Cl The respondent must comply with DHS biometrics instructions by ___-=./

Date
Certificate of Service
This document was served by: M Mail [ ] Personal Service
/Rep fv<J. DHS
To: [ ] Alien [ Alien c/o c&'s'fodial Officer ti.] Alien

By: Coiui Staff...._fi_.._..

........'
------Date:
11

IU ' s

Immigrant & Refugee Appellate Center, LLC | www.irac.net

In the Matter of

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

E:\.tCUTl\t OFFICE FOR L\IMIGRATION REVIEW
L\IMIGRATION COURT
YORK, PE"NSYL VANIA