Formative Feedback Form: UG Course

Engagement Presentation

Execution

Research

Ideation

Learning Outcomes
Exhibit design
sensitivity to
specialized needs,
socio-cultural contexts,
consumer/user groups
in interior space design
strategies, solutions,
installations, objects.
Observe, research,
document, and apply
ergonomic and spatial
aspects of interior
design with respect to
social and collective
habitats.
Integrate advanced
attributes, principles,
and processes involved
in structure,
construction, materials,
and technologies in
public design contexts
balancing human
comfort, aesthetics and
environmental
sensitivity.
Document and apply
sustainable design
strategies, in
vernacular,
contemporary, and
emerging contexts.
Generate, manipulate,
explore and evaluate
multiple complex
design options for
social and collective
spaces in response to
complex design briefs,
with self-reflexivity and
tutor critique.
Use abstract diagrams,
sketches, models,
drafted drawings, and
digitally manipulated
imagery as tools for
design exploration and
development.
Communicate
effectively in a wide
range of Models,
Sketches, Drawings,
3D-visuals. AV/Verbal
presentation.
Work collaboratively
and proactively,
contributing in various
roles as part of a
design/research team.

Created by: Rohin C. Sher, Alex N. Kalenga

2016

Higher
Second
Class

Lower
Second
Class

Third
Class

fail

20%

20%

30%

15%

15%

Date : 29-08-

mmativ100(su Max
e only)
Mark

First
Class

Course: Interior Architecture & Design

Semester/Level:5/ 2
Assignment: Project
Date of assessment:

Weight

Students Name:
Module Title/ credits: Spatial Contexts- 3/ 30
Tutor(s): Alex Kalenga, Rohin C. Sher
Assessment Type: Summative Feedback

Total
Feedback given to you is informed
by the criteria that are based on
the Learning Outcomes of the
module. It should help you
understand your final mark. This
will also help you plan and
execute your work in the future
Assessor:
Alex Kalenga and Rohin C. Sher

100
%

Tutors comments:
I: Need to understand better work done by group to allow you progress to
next step.
R: Work did not show ergonomic and spatial aspect
E: No sketches to show good understanding of space.
P: not enough sketches or drawings to present work on your own
E: Proved a good level of collaboration and contribution to work

Date:
Signature:

Final
Banding

Summative grades: subject to ratification by the

examination/progression board
Formative grade: this is an indication of current status; mark will
not be provided.

Created by: Rohin C. Sher, Alex N. Kalenga

Date : 29-08-2016

IDEATION
RESEARCH
EXECUTION
ENGAGEMENT

FIRST CLASS(70 and

above)
Work evidences a fully
developed knowledge &
extended understanding/
creative dexterity and/or
application of basic concepts
and theoretical framework of
the subject of study.

SECOND CLASS UPPER

DIVISION(60-69)
Work contains evidence of
comprehensive knowledge &
accomplished understanding/
creative dexterity and/or
application of basic concepts
and theoretical framework of
the subject of study.

SECOND CLASS LOWER

DIVISION(50-59)
Work contains evidence of
reasonable knowledge &
appropriate understanding/
creative dexterity and/or
application of basic
concepts and theoretical
framework of the subject of
study.

Strong evidence of extensive

and insightful reading and
study beyond the prescribed
range, ability to critically
evaluate/interpret information
using simple techniques, is
highly competent to extend to
further work.

Work evidences thorough

reading and study within the
prescribed range, with an
ability to rationally
evaluate/interpret information
using simple techniques, is
competent to extend to
further work.

Work evidences appropriate

reading and study within
the prescribed range, with
an ability to reasonably
evaluate/ interpret
information using simple
techniques, reasonable
ability to extend to further
work.

Exemplary work displayed

evidenced by attributes and
practices commensurate with
resource management, time
management, achievement of
plan of work and/or technical
dexterity and completion of
deliverables.

Outstanding work displayed

evidenced by attributes and
practices commensurate with
resource management, time
management, achievement of
plan of work and/or technical
dexterity and completion of
deliverables.

Fairly competent work

evidenced by attributes and
practices commensurate
with resource management,
time management,
achievement of plan of work
and/or technical dexterity
and completion of
deliverables.

Strong evidence of initiation

and improvement, high order
of class attendance as
mandated, high order of team
work and spirit.

Competent of initiation and

improvement, high order of
class attendance as
mandated; stable order of
team work and spirit.

Reasonable evidence of
initiation and improvement,
reasonable order of team
work and class attendance,
able to work well with some
persuasion and counseling

THIRD CLASS (40-49)

FAIL(BELOW 40)

Work evidences sufficient

knowledge &
demonstrates satisfactory
understanding/ creative
dexterity and/or
application of basic
concepts and theoretical
framework of the subject
of study.
Work shows satisfactory
reading and study within
the prescribed range, and
limited ability to evaluate
and interpret information
using simple techniques,
limited ability to extend to
further work.

Work does not demonstrate even

sufficient knowledge &
understanding/creative dexterity
and/or application of even basic
concepts and theoretical framework of
the subject of study

Just acceptable work

evidenced by attributes
and practices
commensurate with
resource management,
time management,
achievement of plan of
work and/or technical
dexterity and completion
of deliverables.
Satisfactory evidence of
initiation and
improvement, irregular
class attendance, mixed
propensity for team work,
requires persuasion and
counselling from time to
time

Work does not demonstrate attributes

and practices commensurate with
resource management, time
management, achievement of plan of
work and/or technical dexterity and
completion of deliverables.

Work hardly shows any evidence of

reading and study even within the
prescribed range, unable to evaluate/
interpret information using even
simple techniques.

Work shows lack of initiation and

improvement, regularly absent from
appearance at classes as mandated,
requires large degree of persuasion
/counselling.

PRESENTATION

Exceptional ability to
coherently communicate
orally, textually, graphically
beyond taught means/tools,
give well-reasoned arguments,
defend work done.

Created by: Rohin C. Sher, Alex N. Kalenga

Outstanding ability to
coherently communicate
orally, textually, graphically
with taught areas/tools only,
competent to put up defense
of own work.

Fairly competent to
coherently communicate
orally, textually, graphically
with taught areas/tools only,
fairly competent to put up
defense of own work.

Date : 29-08-2016

Satisfactory ability to
coherently communicate
orally, textually,
graphically with taught
areas/tools only, very
limited range of
arguments and defense of
work.

Incoherent communication in
oral/textual/graphic terms, unable to
exercise taught means/tools.