Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Results in Focus
Over the past decade, the OECD Programme for International Student Assessment, PISA,
has become the worlds premier yardstick for evaluating the quality, equity and efficiency
of school systems. By identifying the characteristics of high-performing education systems,
PISA allows governments and educators to identify effective policies that they can then adapt
to their local contexts.
The latest PISA assessment in 2015 focused on science. From taking a painkiller to
determining what is a balanced meal, from drinking pasteurised milk to deciding whether
or not to buy a hybrid car, science is ubiquitous in our lives. And science is not just test tubes
and the periodic table; it is the basis of nearly every tool we use from a simple can opener
to the most advanced space explorer. More important, science is not only the domain of
scientists. In the context of massive information flows and rapid change, everyone now needs
to be able to think like a scientist: to be able to weigh evidence and come to a conclusion;
to understand that scientific truth may change over time, as new discoveries are made, and
as humans develop a greater understanding of natural forces and of technologys capacities
and limitations.
This brochure highlights some of the results from PISA 2015. PISA shows that every country
has room for improvement, even the top performers. With high levels of youth unemployment,
rising inequality, a significant gender gap, and an urgent need to boost inclusive growth
in many countries, we have no time to lose in providing the best education possible for
allstudents.
Angel Gurra
OECD Secretary-General
OECD 2016
What is PISA?
Content
Participating students
Approximately 540 000 students completed the assessment in
2015, representing about 29 million 15-year-olds in the schools
of the 72participating countries and economies.
The assessment
Computer-based tests were used, with assessments lasting a
total of two hours for each student.
Test items were a mixture of multiple-choice questions and
questions requiring students to construct their own responses.
The items were organised in groups based on a passage
setting out a real-life situation. About 810minutes of test items
for science, reading, mathematics and collaborative problem
solving were covered, with different students taking different
combinations of test items.
Students also answered a background questionnaire, which
took 35 minutes to complete. The questionnaire sought
information about the students themselves, their homes,
and their school and learning experiences. School principals
completed a questionnaire that covered the school system
and the learning environment. For additional information, some
countries/economies decided to distribute a questionnaire
to teachers. It was the first time that this optional teacher
questionnaire was offered to PISA-participating countries/
economies. In some countries/economies, optional
questionnaires were distributed to parents, who were asked
to provide information on their perceptions of and involvement
in their childs school, their support for learning in the home,
and their childs career expectations, particularly in science.
Countries could choose two other optional questionnaires for
students: one asked students about their familiarity with and use
of information and communication technologies; and the second
sought information about students education to date, including
any interruptions in their schooling, and whether and how they
are preparing for a future career.
OECD 2016
OECD 2016
Equity in education
Canada, Denmark, Estonia, Hong Kong(China) and
Macao(China) achieve high levels of performance and equity
in education outcomes.
Socio-economically disadvantaged students across OECD
countries are almost three times more likely than advantaged
students not to attain the baseline level of proficiency in science.
But about 29% of disadvantaged students are considered
resilient meaning that they beat the odds and perform at high
levels. And in Macao(China) and Viet Nam, students facing the
greatest disadvantage on an international scale outperform the
most advantaged students in about 20 other PISA-participating
countries and economies.
While between 2006 and 2015 no country or economy
improved its performance in science and equity in education
simultaneously, the relationship between socio-economic status
and student performance weakened in nine countries where
mean science scores remained stable. TheUnited States shows
the largest improvements in equity during this period.
On average across OECD countries, and after taking their socioeconomic status into account, immigrant students are more
than twice as likely as their non-immigrant peers to perform
below the baseline level of proficiency in science. Yet 24% of
disadvantaged immigrant students are considered resilient.
On average across countries with relatively large immigrant
student populations, attending a school with a high
concentration of immigrant students is not associated with
poorer student performance, after accounting for the schools
socio-economic intake.
OECD average
Singapore
Japan
Estonia
Chinese Taipei
Finland
Macao (China)
Canada
Viet Nam
Hong Kong (China)
B-S-J-G (China)
Korea
New Zealand
Slovenia
Australia
United Kingdom
Germany
Netherlands
Switzerland
Ireland
Belgium
Denmark
Poland
Portugal
Norway
United States
Austria
France
Sweden
Czech Republic
Spain
Latvia
Russia
Luxembourg
Italy
Hungary
Lithuania
Croatia
CABA (Argentina)
Iceland
Israel
Malta
Slovak Republic
Greece
Chile
Bulgaria
United Arab Emirates
Uruguay
Romania
Cyprus1
Moldova
Albania
Turkey
Trinidad and Tobago
Thailand
Costa Rica
Qatar
Colombia
Mexico
Montenegro
Georgia
Jordan
Indonesia
Brazil
Peru
Lebanon
Tunisia
FYROM
Kosovo
Algeria
Dominican Republic
Reading
Mathematics
Mean score
in PISA 2015
Average
three-year trend
Mean score
in PISA 2015
Mean score
in PISA 2015
Average
three-year trend
Mean
493
Score dif.
-1
Mean
493
Score dif.
-1
Mean
490
Score dif.
-1
%
15.3
%
13.0
556
538
534
532
531
529
528
525
523
518
516
513
513
510
509
509
509
506
503
502
502
501
501
498
496
495
495
493
493
493
490
487
483
481
477
475
475
475
473
467
465
461
455
447
446
437
435
435
433
428
427
425
425
421
420
418
416
416
411
411
409
403
401
397
386
386
384
378
376
332
7
3
2
0
-11
6
-2
-4
-5
m
-2
-7
-2
-6
-1
-2
-5
-2
0
-3
2
3
8
3
2
-5
0
-4
-5
2
1
3
0
2
-9
-3
-5
51
-7
5
2
-10
-6
2
4
-12
1
6
-5
9
18
2
7
2
-7
21
8
2
1
23
-5
3
3
14
m
0
m
m
m
m
535
516
519
497
526
509
527
487
527
494
517
509
505
503
498
509
503
492
521
499
500
506
498
513
497
485
499
500
487
496
488
495
481
485
470
472
487
475
482
479
447
453
467
459
432
434
437
434
443
416
405
428
427
409
427
402
425
423
427
401
408
397
407
398
347
361
352
347
350
358
5
-2
9
1
-5
11
1
-21
-3
m
-11
-6
11
-6
2
6
-3
-4
13
-4
3
3
4
5
-1
-5
2
1
5
7
2
17
5
0
-12
2
5
46
-9
2
3
-12
-8
5
1
-8
5
4
-6
17
10
-18
5
-6
-9
15
6
-1
10
16
2
-2
-2
14
m
-21
m
m
m
m
564
532
520
542
511
544
516
495
548
531
524
495
510
494
492
506
512
521
504
507
511
504
492
502
470
497
493
494
492
486
482
494
486
490
477
478
464
456
488
470
479
475
454
423
441
427
418
444
437
420
413
420
417
415
400
402
390
408
418
404
380
386
377
387
396
367
371
362
360
328
1
1
2
0
-10
5
-4
-17
1
m
-3
-8
2
-8
-1
2
-6
-1
0
-5
-2
5
7
1
-2
-2
-4
-5
-6
1
0
6
-2
7
-4
-2
0
38
-7
10
9
-6
1
4
9
-7
-3
10
-3
13
18
2
2
1
-6
26
5
5
6
15
-1
4
6
10
m
4
m
m
m
m
39.1
25.8
20.4
29.9
21.4
23.9
22.7
12.0
29.3
27.7
25.6
20.5
18.1
18.4
16.9
19.2
20.0
22.2
15.5
19.7
14.9
15.8
15.6
17.6
13.3
16.2
18.4
16.7
14.0
10.9
8.3
13.0
14.1
13.5
10.3
9.5
9.3
7.5
13.2
13.9
15.3
9.7
6.8
3.3
6.9
5.8
3.6
4.3
5.6
2.8
2.0
1.6
4.2
1.7
0.9
3.4
1.2
0.6
2.5
2.6
0.6
0.8
2.2
0.6
2.5
0.6
1.0
0.0
0.1
0.1
4.8
5.6
4.7
8.3
6.3
3.5
5.9
4.5
4.5
10.9
7.7
10.6
8.2
11.1
10.1
9.8
10.9
10.1
6.8
12.7
7.5
8.3
10.7
8.9
13.6
13.5
14.8
11.4
13.7
10.3
10.5
7.7
17.0
12.2
18.5
15.3
14.5
14.5
13.2
20.2
21.9
20.1
20.7
23.3
29.6
31.3
30.8
24.3
26.1
30.1
31.1
31.2
32.9
35.8
33.0
42.0
38.2
33.8
33.0
36.3
35.7
42.3
44.1
46.7
50.7
57.3
52.2
60.4
61.1
70.7
1. Note by Turkey: The information in this document with reference to Cyprus relates to the southern part of the Island. There is no single authority representing both Turkish and Greek Cypriot
people on the Island. Turkey recognises the Turkish Republic of Northern Cyprus (TRNC). Until a lasting and equitable solution is found within the context of the United Nations, Turkey shall preserve
its position concerning the Cyprus issue.
Note by all the European Union Member States of the OECD and the European Union: The Republic of Cyprus is recognised by all members of the United Nations with the exception of Turkey. The
information in this document relates to the area under the effective control of the Government of the Republic of Cyprus.
Notes: Values that are statistically significant are marked in bold.
The average trend is reported for the longest available period since PISA 2006 for science, PISA 2009 for reading, and PISA 2003 for mathematics.
Countries and economies are ranked in descending order of the mean science score in PISA 2015.
Source: OECD, PISA 2015 Database, Tables I.2.4a, I.2.6, I.2.7, I.4.4a and I.5.4a.
OECD 2016
OECD 2016
Most students who sat the PISA 2015 test expressed a broad
interest in science topics and recognised the important role
that science plays in their world; but only a minority of students
reported that they participate in science activities. Boys and girls,
and students from advantaged and disadvantaged backgrounds,
often differ in the ways they engage with science and envisage
themselves working in science-related occupations later on.
Gender-related differences in science engagement and career
expectations appear more related to disparities in what boys
and girls think they are good at and is good for them, than to
differences in what they actually can do.
Stereotypes about scientists and about work in science-related
occupations (computer science is a masculine field and biology
a feminine field; scientists achieve success due to brilliance
rather than hard work; scientists are mad) can discourage
some students from engaging further with science. In addition to
challenging gender stereotypes, parents and teachers can help
support students engagement with science by helping students
become more aware of the range of career opportunities that are
made available with training in science and technology.
Mean
science
score
OECD average
Singapore
Japan
Estonia
Chinese Taipei
Finland
Macao (China)
Canada
Viet Nam
Hong Kong (China)
B-S-J-G (China)
Korea
New Zealand
Slovenia
Australia
United Kingdom
Germany
Netherlands
Switzerland
Ireland
Belgium
Denmark
Poland
Portugal
Norway
United States
Austria
France
Sweden
Czech Republic
Spain
Latvia
Russia
Luxembourg
Italy
Hungary
Lithuania
Croatia
CABA (Argentina)
Iceland
Israel
Malta
Slovak Republic
Greece
Chile
Bulgaria
United Arab Emirates
Uruguay
Romania
Cyprus1
Moldova
Albania
Turkey
Trinidad and Tobago
Thailand
Costa Rica
Qatar
Colombia
Mexico
Montenegro
Georgia
Jordan
Indonesia
Brazil
Peru
Lebanon
Tunisia
FYROM
Kosovo
Algeria
Dominican Republic
Index of epistemic
beliefs (support for
scientific methods
of enquiry)
Score-point
difference per unit
on the index of
epistemic beliefs
All
students
Boys
Mean
493
Mean index
0.00
Score dif.
33
%
24.5
556
538
534
532
531
529
528
525
523
518
516
513
513
510
509
509
509
506
503
502
502
501
501
498
496
495
495
493
493
493
490
487
483
481
477
475
475
475
473
467
465
461
455
447
446
437
435
435
433
428
427
425
425
421
420
418
416
416
411
411
409
403
401
397
386
386
384
378
376
332
0.22
-0.06
0.01
0.31
-0.07
-0.06
0.30
-0.15
0.04
-0.08
0.02
0.22
0.07
0.26
0.22
-0.16
-0.19
-0.07
0.21
0.00
0.17
-0.08
0.28
-0.01
0.25
-0.14
0.01
0.14
-0.23
0.11
-0.26
-0.26
-0.15
-0.10
-0.36
0.11
0.03
0.09
0.29
0.18
0.09
-0.35
-0.19
-0.15
-0.18
0.04
-0.13
-0.38
-0.15
-0.14
-0.03
-0.17
-0.02
-0.07
-0.15
-0.10
-0.19
-0.17
-0.32
0.05
-0.13
-0.30
-0.07
-0.16
-0.24
-0.31
-0.18
0.03
-0.31
-0.10
34
34
36
38
38
26
29
31
23
37
38
40
33
39
37
34
46
34
36
34
32
27
33
35
32
36
30
38
41
30
27
27
35
34
35
22
32
28
28
38
54
36
36
23
34
33
27
27
33
37
m
18
28
35
16
33
21
17
23
42
28
16
27
23
35
18
30
22
16
13
28.0
18.0
24.7
20.9
17.0
20.8
33.9
19.6
23.6
16.8
19.3
24.8
30.8
29.2
29.1
15.3
16.3
19.5
27.3
24.5
14.8
21.0
27.5
28.6
38.0
22.3
21.2
20.2
16.9
28.6
21.3
23.5
21.1
22.6
18.3
23.9
24.2
27.8
23.8
27.8
25.4
18.8
25.3
37.9
27.5
41.3
28.1
23.1
29.9
22.0
24.8
29.7
27.8
19.7
44.0
38.0
39.7
40.7
21.2
17.0
43.7
15.3
38.8
38.7
39.7
34.4
24.2
26.4
26.0
45.7
Girls
Increased
likelihood of boys
expecting a career
in science
Index of
enjoyment of
learning science
Score-point difference
per unit on the index of
enjoyment of learning
science
Gender gap in
enjoyment of
learning science
(Boys - Girls)
%
25.0
%
23.9
Relative risk
1.1
Mean index
0.02
Score dif.
25
Dif.
0.13
31.8
18.5
28.9
25.6
15.4
22.0
31.2
21.2
22.9
17.1
21.7
21.7
34.6
30.3
28.7
17.4
16.9
19.8
28.0
25.3
11.8
15.4
26.7
28.9
33.0
26.6
23.6
21.8
18.6
29.5
21.1
23.2
24.3
24.7
23.9
22.5
26.8
26.2
20.1
26.1
30.2
18.5
25.7
36.9
28.8
39.9
23.8
23.3
29.3
22.5
m
34.5
24.6
12.4
43.8
36.3
37.1
45.4
20.1
16.4
44.6
8.6
34.4
42.7
41.0
28.5
20.0
24.7
23.1
44.7
23.9
17.5
20.3
16.0
18.7
19.6
36.5
18.1
24.2
16.5
16.7
27.9
26.8
28.2
29.6
13.2
15.7
19.1
26.6
23.6
17.7
26.8
28.3
28.4
43.0
18.0
18.7
18.5
15.0
27.8
21.5
23.8
18.0
20.6
12.8
25.4
21.8
29.3
27.3
29.5
20.4
19.0
24.9
39.0
25.9
42.6
31.9
23.0
30.5
21.3
m
24.9
31.0
25.2
44.2
39.9
42.0
35.8
22.4
17.7
42.8
22.1
42.8
34.6
38.5
39.5
28.8
28.1
29.2
46.8
1.3
1.1
1.4
1.6
0.8
1.1
0.9
1.2
0.9
1.0
1.3
0.8
1.3
1.1
1.0
1.3
1.1
1.0
1.1
1.1
0.7
0.6
0.9
1.0
0.8
1.5
1.3
1.2
1.2
1.1
1.0
1.0
1.4
1.2
1.9
0.9
1.2
0.9
0.7
0.9
1.5
1.0
1.0
0.9
1.1
0.9
0.7
1.0
1.0
1.1
m
1.4
0.8
0.5
1.0
0.9
0.9
1.3
0.9
0.9
1.0
0.4
0.8
1.2
1.1
0.7
0.7
0.9
0.8
1.0
0.59
-0.33
0.16
-0.06
-0.07
0.20
0.40
0.65
0.28
0.37
-0.14
0.20
-0.36
0.12
0.15
-0.18
-0.52
-0.02
0.20
-0.03
0.12
0.02
0.32
0.12
0.23
-0.32
-0.03
0.08
-0.34
0.03
0.09
0.00
0.10
0.00
-0.23
0.36
-0.11
-0.20
0.15
0.09
0.18
-0.24
0.13
0.08
0.28
0.47
-0.10
-0.03
0.15
0.33
0.72
0.15
0.19
0.42
0.35
0.36
0.32
0.42
0.09
0.34
0.53
0.65
0.23
0.40
0.38
0.52
0.48
0.92
0.46
0.54
35
27
24
28
30
21
26
14
20
28
31
32
22
33
30
29
30
30
32
28
26
18
23
29
26
25
30
27
27
28
18
16
26
22
20
20
22
15
24
20
48
25
27
15
17
22
16
17
29
22
m
12
24
18
4
25
7
12
14
23
23
6
19
9
32
15
17
14
14
6
0.17
0.52
0.05
0.39
0.04
0.16
0.15
0.06
0.26
0.14
0.32
0.03
-0.03
0.16
0.18
0.43
0.25
0.17
0.09
0.20
0.09
-0.10
0.08
0.27
0.21
0.23
0.31
0.22
-0.06
0.11
0.03
0.07
0.14
0.24
-0.02
-0.14
0.05
-0.14
0.26
0.06
0.11
-0.02
0.12
-0.09
-0.16
-0.02
-0.07
-0.05
0.06
-0.17
m
0.01
-0.01
-0.05
-0.03
0.00
-0.02
0.01
-0.07
-0.13
-0.25
-0.06
-0.04
0.01
-0.04
-0.12
-0.29
-0.16
-0.12
-0.05
1. Note by Turkey: The information in this document with reference to Cyprus relates to the southern part of the Island. There is no single authority representing both Turkish and Greek Cypriot
people on the Island. Turkey recognises the Turkish Republic of Northern Cyprus (TRNC). Until a lasting and equitable solution is found within the context of the United Nations, Turkey shall preserve
its position concerning the Cyprus issue.
Note by all the European Union Member States of the OECD and the European Union: The Republic of Cyprus is recognised by all members of the United Nations with the exception of Turkey. The
information in this document relates to the area under the effective control of the Government of the Republic of Cyprus.
Notes: Values that are statistically significant are marked in bold.
Countries and economies are ranked in descending order of the mean science score in PISA 2015.
Source: OECD, PISA 2015 Database, Tables I.2.12a-b, I.3.1a-c and I.3.10a-b.
OECD 2016
1. ESCS refers to the PISA index of economic, social and cultural status.
2. All score-point differences in science performance associated with a one-unit increase on the PISA
index of economic, social and cultural status are statistically significant.
3. A student is classified as resilient if he or she is in the bottom quarter of the PISA index of economic,
social and cultural status in the country/economy of assessment and performs in the top quarter of
students among all countries/economies, after accounting for socio-economic status.
4. A positive score indicates a performance difference in favour of non-immigrant students; a negative
score indicates a performance difference in favour of immigrant students.
5. Note by Turkey: The information in this document with reference to Cyprus relates to the southern
part of the Island. There is no single authority representing both Turkish and Greek Cypriot people
on the Island. Turkey recognises the Turkish Republic of Northern Cyprus (TRNC). Until a lasting and
equitable solution is found within the context of the United Nations, Turkey shall preserve its position
concerning the Cyprus issue.
Note by all the European Union Member States of the OECD and the European Union:
The Republic of Cyprus is recognised by all members of the United Nations with the exception
of Turkey. The information in this document relates to the area under the effective control of the
Government of the Republic of Cyprus.
Notes: Values that are statistically significant are marked in bold.
Countries and economies are ranked in descending order of the mean science score in PISA 2015.
Source: OECD, PISA 2015 Database, Tables I.2.3, I.6.1, I.6.3a, I.6.7, I.6.17, I.7.1 and I.7.15a.
OECD 2016
OECD average
Singapore
Japan
Estonia
Chinese Taipei
Finland
Macao (China)
Canada
Viet Nam
Hong Kong (China)
B-S-J-G (China)
Korea
New Zealand
Slovenia
Australia
United Kingdom
Germany
Netherlands
Switzerland
Ireland
Belgium
Denmark
Poland
Portugal
Norway
United States
Austria
France
Sweden
Czech Republic
Spain
Latvia
Russia
Luxembourg
Italy
Hungary
Lithuania
Croatia
CABA (Argentina)
Iceland
Israel
Malta
Slovak Republic
Greece
Chile
Bulgaria
United Arab Emirates
Uruguay
Romania
Cyprus5
Moldova
Albania
Turkey
Trinidad and Tobago
Thailand
Costa Rica
Qatar
Colombia
Mexico
Montenegro
Georgia
Jordan
Indonesia
Brazil
Peru
Lebanon
Tunisia
FYROM
Kosovo
Algeria
Dominican Republic
Percentage of variation
in science performance
explained by students
socio-economic status
Mean
493
Mean index
0.89
%
12.9
556
538
534
532
531
529
528
525
523
518
516
513
513
510
509
509
509
506
503
502
502
501
501
498
496
495
495
493
493
493
490
487
483
481
477
475
475
475
473
467
465
461
455
447
446
437
435
435
433
428
427
425
425
421
420
418
416
416
411
411
409
403
401
397
386
386
384
378
376
332
0.96
0.95
0.93
0.85
0.97
0.88
0.84
0.49
0.89
0.64
0.92
0.90
0.93
0.91
0.84
0.96
0.95
0.96
0.96
0.93
0.89
0.91
0.88
0.91
0.84
0.83
0.91
0.94
0.94
0.91
0.89
0.95
0.88
0.80
0.90
0.90
0.91
1.04
0.93
0.94
0.98
0.89
0.91
0.80
0.81
0.91
0.72
0.93
0.95
0.93
0.84
0.70
0.76
0.71
0.63
0.93
0.75
0.62
0.90
0.79
0.86
0.68
0.71
0.74
0.66
0.93
0.95
0.71
0.79
0.68
17
10
8
14
10
2
9
11
5
18
10
14
13
12
11
16
13
16
13
19
10
13
15
8
11
16
20
12
19
13
9
7
21
10
21
12
12
26
5
11
14
16
13
17
16
5
16
14
9
12
m
9
10
9
16
4
14
11
5
11
9
13
12
22
10
9
7
5
1
13
Countries/economies with higher performance or greater equity than the OECD average
Countries with values not statistically different from the OECD average
Countries/economies with lower performance or less equity than the OECD average
Inclusion and fairness indicators
Score-point difference
in science associated
with one-unit increase
on the ESCS1 index
Score dif.2
38
47
42
32
45
40
12
34
23
19
40
44
49
43
44
37
42
47
43
38
48
34
40
31
37
33
45
57
44
52
27
26
29
41
30
47
36
38
37
28
42
47
41
34
32
41
30
32
34
31
33
m
20
31
22
24
27
27
19
23
34
25
22
27
30
26
17
25
18
8
25
Difference between PISA 2006 and PISA 2015 (PISA 2015 - PISA 2006)
Percentage of resilient
students3
%
29.2
48.8
48.8
48.3
46.3
42.8
64.6
38.7
75.5
61.8
45.3
40.4
30.4
34.6
32.9
35.4
33.5
30.7
29.1
29.6
27.2
27.5
34.6
38.1
26.5
31.6
25.9
26.6
24.7
24.9
39.2
35.2
25.5
20.7
26.6
19.3
23.1
24.4
14.9
17.0
15.7
21.8
17.5
18.1
14.6
13.6
7.7
14.0
11.3
10.1
13.4
m
21.8
12.9
18.4
9.4
5.7
11.4
12.8
9.4
7.5
7.7
10.9
9.4
3.2
6.1
4.7
4.1
2.5
7.4
0.4
Difference in science
performance between
immigrant and non-immigrant
students, after accounting for
ESCS and language spoken
at home4
Score dif.
19
-13
53
28
m
36
-19
-5
m
-1
135
m
-3
14
-13
15
28
23
16
3
28
38
m
8
23
-5
18
20
40
2
26
14
5
22
11
-11
2
14
15
53
-9
-5
40
14
21
49
-77
11
m
1
0
m
22
19
-8
6
-77
60
57
-7
4
-2
m
64
29
18
50
23
28
33
26
Percentage of variation
in science performance
explained by students socioeconomic status
Score-point difference
in science associated
with one-unit increase
on the ESCS index
% dif.
-1.4
Score dif.
0
m
1.6
-1.0
1.0
1.8
-0.1
0.3
m
-1.5
m
3.1
-2.0
-4.0
-0.4
-2.9
-4.0
-3.8
-0.7
-0.5
-0.7
-3.6
-1.4
-1.4
-0.4
-6.0
0.1
-1.9
1.2
2.7
0.9
-0.5
-0.9
-1.7
-0.6
0.3
-2.6
-0.1
m
-2.6
0.9
m
-3.6
-2.1
-6.4
-6.3
m
-1.6
-1.5
m
m
m
-6.1
m
-6.5
m
2.4
3.1
-5.2
-2.6
m
-1.6
3.5
-4.5
m
m
0.1
m
m
m
m
m
2
2
2
10
0
1
m
-8
m
13
0
-5
2
-8
-5
3
0
1
2
-7
0
3
1
-13
0
5
6
1
3
-4
0
2
-1
2
-2
3
m
-3
0
m
-4
-2
-6
-7
m
-2
-1
m
m
m
-7
m
-5
m
15
4
-5
-1
m
0
1
-1
m
m
-2
m
m
m
m
Percentage of resilient
students
% dif.
1.5
m
8.2
2.0
2.0
-10.4
5.8
0.7
m
-0.7
m
-3.2
-4.7
4.3
-0.2
5.0
8.7
-1.3
1.2
0.4
1.4
7.9
3.2
4.4
9.3
12.3
-2.2
3.0
0.6
-3.9
10.7
6.0
-1.0
1.5
2.8
-6.7
-2.1
-0.5
m
-1.8
2.3
m
-2.8
-2.3
-0.4
4.1
m
-1.8
4.8
m
m
m
-1.4
m
-5.2
m
4.9
0.3
-1.9
1.8
m
-6.6
-4.1
-0.9
m
m
-11.7
m
m
m
m
Difference in science
performance between
immigrant and non-immigrant
students, after accounting
for ESCS and language
spoken at home
Score dif.
-6
m
m
-2
m
-11
-2
-11
m
10
m
m
-9
1
-8
9
7
-10
-20
6
-32
7
m
-49
8
-10
-17
10
13
-20
-23
7
-4
-16
-32
-13
11
7
m
24
1
m
m
5
m
m
m
m
m
m
m
m
21
m
m
m
-19
m
-21
12
m
13
m
30
m
m
-20
m
m
m
m
OECD 2016
OECD 2016
Differences in the requirement to attend regular science lessons, by schools socio-economic profile
Results based on students self-reports
Percentage-point difference
30
25
20
15
10
-5
-10
Croatia
Belgium
Austria
France
Chinese Taipei
Germany
Slovak Republic
Malta
Switzerland
Luxembourg
Australia
Kosovo
Greece
Uruguay
Montenegro
Korea
Canada
New Zealand
Ireland
Thailand
Italy
FYROM
Japan
Turkey
Qatar
CABA (Argentina)
Hong Kong (China)
United States
Brazil
OECD average
Costa Rica
Slovenia
Colombia
Trinidad and Tobago
Singapore
Chile
Georgia
United Kingdom
Romania
United Arab Emirates
Finland
Czech Republic
Spain
Jordan
Albania
Dominican Republic
Bulgaria
Tunisia
Israel
Norway
Denmark
Poland
Estonia
Lebanon
Peru
Russia
Moldova
Algeria
Latvia
Sweden
Netherlands
Hungary
Mexico
B-S-J-G (China)
Macao (China)
Indonesia
Iceland
Portugal
15.7
13.5
9.1
4.5
7.5
4.8
11.5
5.8
8.5
6.8
10.1
8.9
4.6
4.6
5.9
2.5
13.7
5.8
7.8
6.9
2.9
24.9
2.6
7.1
5.4
3.1
23.8
6.4
8.1
6.4
3.3
1.3
6.4
8.1
1.3
1.1
1.5
1.6
1.6
7.0
3.9
0.4
16.3
2.2
2.1
3.3
0.5
3.4
7.2
0.5
1.0
0.4
0.4
0.8
1.3
0.5
5.7
2.4
0.7
0.9
15.5
14.0
3.8
5.9
18.6
4.2
3.1
30.0
-15
OECD 2016
11
Percentage of students
60
2012
50
40
30
20
10
-1
5
2
2
4
2
2
2
1
3
2
4
3
6
-2
-4
7
4
5
8
3
-18
-3
20
13
10
-3
5
8
8
Montenegro
Italy
Uruguay
Slovak Republic
Brazil
Turkey
Bulgaria
Colombia
Qatar
Peru
Costa Rica
United States
Finland
Israel
Thailand
Tunisia
Australia
Mexico
United Kingdom
New Zealand
Latvia
Spain
Ireland
Russia
Estonia
Lithuania
United Arab Emirates
Portugal
Poland
OECD average
Greece
Canada
Denmark
Singapore
Norway
Slovenia
Croatia
Luxembourg
Austria
France
Switzerland
Chile
Sweden
Germany
Hungary
Czech Republic
Belgium
Macao (China)
Netherlands
Iceland
Hong Kong (China)
Chinese Taipei
Korea
Japan
35
7
28
42
28
-7
20
39
24
26
8
16
26
Notes: Only countries/economies that participated in both 2012 and 2015 PISA assessments are shown.
Only percentage-point differences between PISA 2012 and PISA 2015 that are statistically significant are shown next to the country/economy name.
Countries and economies are ranked in descending order of the percentage of students who had skipped a whole day of school at least once in the two weeks prior to the PISA test, in 2015.
Source: OECD, PISA 2015 Database, Tables II.3.1, II.3.2 and II.3.3.
OECD 2016
Correlations between the responsibilities for school governance and science performance
Results based on system-level analyses
Higher
science
performance
School principal
0.6
Teachers
Local or regional
education authority
0.4
0.2
0.0
-0.2
-0.4
Students score lower in science
when the school governing board
holds more responsibility for
admissions policies
-0.6
Admissions policies
Assessment policies
Disciplinary policies
Curriculum
Resources
Admissions policies
Assessment policies
Disciplinary policies
Curriculum
Resources
Admissions policies
Assessment policies
Disciplinary policies
Curriculum
Resources
Admissions policies
Assessment policies
Disciplinary policies
Curriculum
Resources
Admissions policies
Assessment policies
Disciplinary policies
Curriculum
Lower
science
performance
Resources
-0.8
1. The responsibilities for school governance are measured by the share distribution of responsibilities for school governance in Table II.4.2 in PISA 2015 Results (Volume II): Policies and Practices
for Successful Schools.
Notes: Results based on 70 education systems.
Statistically significant correlation coefficients are shown in a darker tone.
Source: OECD, PISA 2015 Database.
OECD 2016
13
2015
2009
-5
-2
-13
50
-2
-3
-4
Percentage of students who had repeated a grade in primary, lower secondary or upper secondary school
45
40
35
30
25
20
15
10
5
-1
-1
-2
-2
-5
-1
-2
-2
-2
-2
-15
-3
-19
-11
3
-16
-7
-6
13
2
-10
-4
-6
-9
-4
-10
Colombia
Brazil
Uruguay
Tunisia
Belgium
Macao (China)
Trinidad and Tobago
Costa Rica
Spain
Portuagal
Luxembourg
Peru
Chile
France
Neterlands
Switzerland
Germany
Quatar
Hong Kong (China)
Indonesia
Mexico
Austria
Italy
United Arab Emirates
OECD average
United States
Turkey
Hungary
Israel
Jordan
Ireland
Australia
Malta
Slovak Republic
Thailand
Romania
Canada
Singapore
Poland
Latvia
Greece
New Zeland
Bulgaria
Czech Republic
Sweden
Estonia
Danmark
Moldova
Finland
United Kingdom
Albana
Lithuania
Slovenia
Montenegro
Croatia
Russia
Georgia
Iceland
Chinese Taipei
5
-6
Notes: Statistically significant differences are shown next to the country/economy name.
Only countries and economies with comparable data from PISA 2009 and PISA 2015 are shown.
For Costa Rica, Georgia, Malta and Moldova, the change between PISA 2009 and PISA 2015 represents the change between 2010 and 2015 because these countries implemented the PISA 2009
assessment in 2010 as part of PISA 2009+.
Countries and economies are ranked in descending order of the percentage of students who had repeated a grade in 2015.
Source: OECD, PISA 2015 Database, Tables II.5.9, II.5.10 and II.5.11.
OECD 2016
This work is published under the responsibility of the Secretary-General of the OECD. The opinions expressed and arguments employed herein do not
necessarily reflect the official views of OECD member countries.
This document and any map included herein are without prejudice to the status of or sovereignty over any territory, to the delimitation of international
frontiers and boundaries and to the name of any territory, city or area.
The statistical data for Israel are supplied by and under the responsibility of the relevant Israeli authorities. The use of such data by the OECD is without
prejudice to the status of the Golan Heights, East Jerusalem and Israeli settlements in the West Bank under the terms of international law.
B-S-J-G (China) refers to the four PISA-participating China provinces: Beijing, Shanghai, Jiangsu and Guangdong.
CABA (Argentina) refers to the adjudicated region of Ciudad Autnoma de Buenos Aires (CABA).
FYROM refers to the Former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia.
Russia refers to the Russian Federation.
OECD 2016
This work is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 IGO (CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO). For specific information regarding the
scope and terms of the licence as well as possible commercial use of this work or the use of PISA data please consult Terms and Conditions on www.oecd.org.
OECD 2016
15